Slashdot Mirror


User: Catbeller

Catbeller's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3,326
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3,326

  1. NO institution pays interest. That's over. Deregulation took care of that. Saving money is automatically a loser's game, as the banks pay .000001 % interest and inflation eats it away. Where's the interest going? Up the ladder, never to the account holder. The banks are making bank.

  2. But car prices keep going up. They pay workers less. The Invisible hand seems to be off wanking here; what's happening is the management is transfering profits to themselves personally and funds to buy up competitors and suppliers. And the prices go ever up.

  3. Re:The downfall of this idea on Bidding Website Rentberry May Be the Startup of Your Nightmares (gizmodo.com) · · Score: 1

    They will probably make the bidder sign away all civil rights protections. Doesn't matter if that's illegal, because they'll do it anyway. And frankly when the dust settles the new Republican Supreme Court will not have a problem with it.

  4. Re:This sounds amazing on Bidding Website Rentberry May Be the Startup of Your Nightmares (gizmodo.com) · · Score: 0

    A rich guy. That's what matters. And being pale is a great help.

  5. Re:How's this any different from the norm? on Bidding Website Rentberry May Be the Startup of Your Nightmares (gizmodo.com) · · Score: 1

    The difference is you are paying a lot more. Simple. And you will pay more forever, in an endless upward spiral.

  6. Re:Seems like a good idea to me... on Bidding Website Rentberry May Be the Startup of Your Nightmares (gizmodo.com) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why would a developer build anything but the priciest luxury rentals? There is no economic incentive to build small places for small rents. There ain't no such thing as a free market for *renters*. Every advantage and price increase trick is on the side of the the property owners.

    Developers will never, ever build enough units to drop rental prices. That would be stupid. They will build to keep supply high for the highest incomes, and let the lower price units dribble away into condos, which keeps rents high and induces more pricey condo contrstuction.

    There is no incentive whatsoever to build cheap apartments. A decentive, really, because the neighbors will fight to the death anyone who tries to put low-income people in their Zillow Zone.

  7. Re:Not about winning a bet on Elon Musk: I Can Fix South Australia Power Network in 100 Days Or It's Free (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1

    The country is drowning in potential solar power. This is a solvable problem, to be sure.

  8. Re:Not about winning a bet on Elon Musk: I Can Fix South Australia Power Network in 100 Days Or It's Free (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1

    Panasonic batteries, and they're easily replaceable. In 5-10 years, the batteries will be 50% or more capacious, at a fraction of today's cost. The cost to replace will shrink constantly.

  9. Every point but 3 is utterly false. You made it up.

  10. Re:Not surprising on Google Has Stopped Developing Its Own Self-Driving Car - Report (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 1

    How much of all this is just misanthropy.

    Plenty of CEOs drinking and operating companies; plenty of sociopaths, too. Such are planning to replace tens of millions of people and crash a good chunk of the planet into depression. I'll be impressed when the CEOs get replaced by AI.

    Circuits are by definition the opposite of real world. The Pittsburg taxis have drivers. The Ohio trucks have drivers. And they are crashing plenty; they just are not telling us about it.

  11. Re:What about the CEO doing hard time in san quent on Uber Self-Driving Cars Hit the Streets of San Francisco (go.com) · · Score: 1

    Ho ho. A CEO in prison.

  12. Re:Yes they did on Uber Self-Driving Cars Hit the Streets of San Francisco (go.com) · · Score: 1

    Image a game you watch being played by the computer instead of you. The joystick moves, apeing the computer's decisions. You can override if the character does something idiotic. Now, how long til your brain shuts off, and you react too late when the character runs into a sword.

    Now: imagine it's a car. You are in it. Your hand hovers over the wheel, trying every second to outguess the computer. You have a quarter second to react. You fail. You die.

  13. Re:No they didn't on Uber Self-Driving Cars Hit the Streets of San Francisco (go.com) · · Score: 1

    Fist bump, my brother.

  14. Re:Colour me suprised on Google Has Stopped Developing Its Own Self-Driving Car - Report (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 2

    You're imagining we're going to reengineer reality to fit the app?

  15. Re:Trouble down the road on Google Has Stopped Developing Its Own Self-Driving Car - Report (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 1

    Indded. We'd be committing everyone - poor, old, rich, young - to constantly rebuy cars on a schedule that automakers decide. They could obsolete cars at will. Or set up subsciption services - brake control, GPS maps, charge us for our own surveillance.

    What is unbelievable is they think that cars are retired every five years or so, so obsolence won't be a problem. They know perfectly well that people keep cars for ten - fifteen years because, well, they're bloody expensive. They want that option gone. We'll be on an upgrade cycle like PCs, and enormously profitable one.

    Cars, esp. electric cars, can easily last twenty years. Change the batteries, the motor bearings, seals, and it can keep going. That is a huge problem for car manufacturers. Computer controlled everything fixes all that for them.

  16. Re:Not surprising on Google Has Stopped Developing Its Own Self-Driving Car - Report (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 1

    And yet, Google gave up. Time to accept.

  17. Re:Not surprising on Google Has Stopped Developing Its Own Self-Driving Car - Report (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 2

    Those things on the road are not self-driving cars. They are apps that can, with human oversight, kinda imitate a human driver in careully orchestrated conditions. But there are *no* self-driving cars out there. And Google just gave up.

    The real goal is self-driving trucks and taxis. They want to fire all the drivers and keep all the money, so there is a lot of *want* on the part of capital. But we haven't built an AI that can match a trained human. If we have such, they'd have shown the robots proudly whipping around the streets, unpiloted. There aren't. Maybe someday we can do it, but right now we're being bamboozed by billionaires who are bamboozling themselves.

    Missouri rule: Show me.

    Too many things a toaster can't do. The most important: actual human thought.

  18. Re:Yes. No. Maybe. on Will Trump Protect America's IT Workers From H-1B Visa Abuses? (cio.com.au) · · Score: 1

    So, no facts can enter your bubble, then.

  19. Re:Yes. No. Maybe. on Will Trump Protect America's IT Workers From H-1B Visa Abuses? (cio.com.au) · · Score: 1

    He's a con artist. He dropped a couple of positions already. He lied, people.

  20. Self fulfilling prophecy on Will Trump Protect America's IT Workers From H-1B Visa Abuses? (cio.com.au) · · Score: 1

    As they have depressed the market for native techies, it follows they've depressed the desire of people to enter that job market, so they *will* see a shortage of candidates now.

  21. Exposed our jugular veins to predators on Ransomware Compromises San Francisco's Mass Transit System (cbslocal.com) · · Score: 2

    I don't care how clever you all think you are, you cannot design a system that cannot be hacked.
    We've gone far too far, hooking up control and command to the internet. We did it to fire people and save money, or at least divert the money once given to ticket takers to computer companies.
    So, this is what the future is.

  22. Re:All the rides are not free. on Ransomware Compromises San Francisco's Mass Transit System (cbslocal.com) · · Score: 2

    Rides were free yesterday.

  23. This site is loaded with post-truthers.

  24. F Hell, do ANY OF YOU READ A DAMNED BOOK? on Will The New 'Starship Troopers' Reboot Stay Faithful To The Book? (hollywoodreporter.com) · · Score: 1

    SERIOUSLY. One of you read it. ONE. Yet you all seem to think you know all about it.

  25. Odd, as almost every single conservative Republican officeholder in Congress ducked military service, whereas the cowardly liberals have dozens. Reagan did propaganda films in Hollywood, Bush W decided he didn't feel like flying anymore and discharged himself.