And what about the beam refraction? Specular surfaces anyone? 2w beams are dangerous if they hit you in the eye (instant blindness), what could a 40w do?
Check out this chart: http://montanabiotech.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/cannabinoids-pie-chart.png
And also please look up the definition of "treatment": Medical care given to a patient for an illness or injury. Cannabis does treat alot.. dozens and dozens of conditions.. Also has anti cancer properties. I hope with the next generation of politicians they will actually look into science and not simply disregard studies. Though money talks especially when coming from corporate lobbyists. Lamar Smith was paid something like $30k by the Beer and Wine industry to shoot down a recent bill that would leave it up to the states for legalization.
Puppets on strings.
I looked for the new study you were talking about and they were only talking about adolescents. All the other studies i have seen on adults shown no damage, any effects went away 24 hours from ingesting. This includes a quite in depth study, i can pull up sources if requested. As for adolescents, if it was regulated and controlled like Alcohol and Tobacco then it would be more difficult for youths to get it. Right now it is easier for kids to get weed than beer/vodka, this would not be the case if they were carded for it in the same stores that card for 21+ items.
Its been shown to treat Fibromyalgia, Multiple Sclerosis, Tourette Syndrome, Glaucoma and helps relief the pain of AIDS. All of the conditions i mentioned have studies backing them.
The FDA will not study it as it is a Schedule I drug, and the only federal agency that does study it is NIDA which has recently said they are only looking for negative effects (no joke!).
Another great example is science has shown though numerous studies that cannabis is quite safe, mildly addictive (less than alcohol, and much much less than tobacco), has anti cancer properties and has been shown to treat many illnesses and diseases.
But when the president or the DEA speaks on the subject, they contradict every study and fail to acknowledge the existence of those studies. They go back to saying that the FDA has found no medical use and its highly addictive.
They just ignore the facts and push what is in the interest of the lobbyists and "their" morals. Completely disregarding scientific fact.
Slashdot Mirror
it was your choice to have child(s) so stop bitching.....
Exactly what he about about natural gas. There is so much rich resources here in the US, having to go to other countries to pillage theirs is a waste.
you hit the nail on the head sir.
rather find primes with primecoin, and get paid while doing it :-)
+1
seems they have been doing alot more right than wrong recently.
And the price of bitcoin goes up!
To the makers of these videos, please focus your webcam. Or buy one more than $20..... it hurts
And what about the beam refraction? Specular surfaces anyone? 2w beams are dangerous if they hit you in the eye (instant blindness), what could a 40w do?
+1
Until i can install Ubuntu on my RAID array without dealing with manual grub entries, its not ready to be paid for IMO.
oh the politicians will hate this, will make flip flopping a little harder.
Actually they are worth $10 per BTC. They were $13 a week ago.
This couldnt be more true...
http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/encrypt-gmail-facebook-messages/
yeah well no sh*t
Piracy?.. no, more like corporate greed.
let CNET burn, im tired of them bundling in malware in their "download managers/installers".
Check out this chart: http://montanabiotech.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/cannabinoids-pie-chart.png And also please look up the definition of "treatment": Medical care given to a patient for an illness or injury. Cannabis does treat alot.. dozens and dozens of conditions.. Also has anti cancer properties. I hope with the next generation of politicians they will actually look into science and not simply disregard studies. Though money talks especially when coming from corporate lobbyists. Lamar Smith was paid something like $30k by the Beer and Wine industry to shoot down a recent bill that would leave it up to the states for legalization. Puppets on strings.
I looked for the new study you were talking about and they were only talking about adolescents. All the other studies i have seen on adults shown no damage, any effects went away 24 hours from ingesting. This includes a quite in depth study, i can pull up sources if requested. As for adolescents, if it was regulated and controlled like Alcohol and Tobacco then it would be more difficult for youths to get it. Right now it is easier for kids to get weed than beer/vodka, this would not be the case if they were carded for it in the same stores that card for 21+ items. Its been shown to treat Fibromyalgia, Multiple Sclerosis, Tourette Syndrome, Glaucoma and helps relief the pain of AIDS. All of the conditions i mentioned have studies backing them. The FDA will not study it as it is a Schedule I drug, and the only federal agency that does study it is NIDA which has recently said they are only looking for negative effects (no joke!).
Another great example is science has shown though numerous studies that cannabis is quite safe, mildly addictive (less than alcohol, and much much less than tobacco), has anti cancer properties and has been shown to treat many illnesses and diseases. But when the president or the DEA speaks on the subject, they contradict every study and fail to acknowledge the existence of those studies. They go back to saying that the FDA has found no medical use and its highly addictive. They just ignore the facts and push what is in the interest of the lobbyists and "their" morals. Completely disregarding scientific fact.