Even when it comes to non-free things. All those MP3s on the P2P networks were originally ripped from CDs that were purchased for cash. All the items at a charity food pantry were bought with real money. Cash goes into the church collection plates and Salvation Army buckets. Buying an object with money doesn't make sharing it non-free. I may buy a cd because I like it, and then share it because it's free for me to do so.
I may buy pants, because the judge told me so, and then give to charity later, if I would throw them away otherwise (if they have 0 value for me for any reason).
Collectively we're quite evil, but when it comes to free things, we can make the superhuman effort of sharing them.
However, this usually only works when it takes more effort to avoid sharing them.
Check for your natural sharing instincts in this situations:
You have to take out the garbage. You'd rather:
A. Take the garbage out yourself. B. Share the garbage with the neighbor. C. Pull out your own eyeballs with a rusty wooden sock.
You have to set up your network. You'd rather:
A. Configure it securely with a complex password you'll have to remember. B. Not give a shit. At all. Not even to understand what a network is. C. Cowboy Neal.
However, in my country, right now, there's no chance of not finding a nice job with any kind of CS higher education. Even if you use double negatives? Maybe you should have gone to a liberal arts school... Is the original sentence correct?
As far as I know, the "double negatives" mistake applies only when removing both doesn't change the meaning. In this case: "There's a chance of finding a nice job" changes the meaning.
English is not my first language but I'd like a second opinion anyway.
I'd choose the college with the most beautiful women.
However, in my country, right now, there's no chance of not finding a nice job with any kind of CS higher education.
Also, take into account the importance of your choice of college will fade after some years. At 45, your rank (?) won't really depend on your college but on your skill and abilities.
Then how the heck do I make split-second decisions when playing a FPS, reacting to the unknown factors like enemy movements? You've subconsciously learned the way people move in FPSs.
In every situation the possibilities seem infinite, but only one is optimal. The better a player is, the more often he'll choose that optimal path.
That's why between two very skilled players, the results are consistent (the less skilled loses every time they encounter) but between a skilled player and an unskilled one, they are more random.
The unskilled player surprises the skilled one by constantly choosing unoptimal paths; those actions usually end up costing him a loss, but, sometimes, the weirdness of his movements gets him a kill.
For me it can only be 3D if you can walk around the projection and see other sides as if it was a solid object. I see.
Where do you want your copy of Beowulf + glasses, sent?
How much do you have to process the data so it stops counting for data protection issues?
In six months you can intermingle the data items so much there's no way of proving you're actually storing the data and you'd still have what you need of that data.
How does law track the identity line of a data item? Data has no memory and leaves no trace.
I find it hard to believe it got that many machines by having users click "olsontwinsnude.jpg.exe". I try not to believe many things, but as I grow older and know more people it's becoming harder.
Oh, the happy days when I believed I was finding many times my share of stupid people.
The butterfly flaps its wings twice. Oh dear God no! Quick, everybody to the shelter. Micky, take the tinfoil, Becky, the red ink. John, the condenser and the racket.
So if I find, lets say, a neon blue apple and an apple with a cube shape.. Did I not find two unique apples? But not totally unique. They aren't unique in appleness, only in shape or color.
Those are a clear example of partially unique, or quite unique, apples.
I mean, it's not so hard to imagine two stars circling one another. Don't they study how would that work without waiting to find an instance?
Actually, I supposed astrophysicist first studied the effects of an unobserved configuration and from the results they described what data to expect from such a configuration. Actually finding it was the last step, in my supposition created world.
The article, however, seems to describe the discovery as quite a surprise.
Slashdot Mirror
I was killed Monday and didn't make it back to the field till Wednesday. Respawn times are boring.
I request this glaring bug to be corrected by next patch.
I may buy pants, because the judge told me so, and then give to charity later, if I would throw them away otherwise (if they have 0 value for me for any reason).
People actually share free things.
Collectively we're quite evil, but when it comes to free things, we can make the superhuman effort of sharing them.
However, this usually only works when it takes more effort to avoid sharing them.
Check for your natural sharing instincts in this situations:
You have to take out the garbage. You'd rather:
A. Take the garbage out yourself.
B. Share the garbage with the neighbor.
C. Pull out your own eyeballs with a rusty wooden sock.
You have to set up your network. You'd rather:
A. Configure it securely with a complex password you'll have to remember.
B. Not give a shit. At all. Not even to understand what a network is.
C. Cowboy Neal.
"No! Wait!"
"Ok, Bob and Jane, today you'll be looking for terrorists on *rattle, rattle* ... 15 ... hmm ... GEHENNA!"
As far as I know, the "double negatives" mistake applies only when removing both doesn't change the meaning. In this case: "There's a chance of finding a nice job" changes the meaning.
English is not my first language but I'd like a second opinion anyway.
Spain.
I'd choose the college with the most beautiful women.
However, in my country, right now, there's no chance of not finding a nice job with any kind of CS higher education.
Also, take into account the importance of your choice of college will fade after some years. At 45, your rank (?) won't really depend on your college but on your skill and abilities.
Sharerman!
He will share global economy to it's knees!
His nefarious plan of... sharing stuff, has to be stopped!
They should test physics systems with spheres on irregular ground, with uneven μ (coefficient of kinetic friction), and changing wind.
Those are the kind of problems that force programmers to use approximations when using a physics engine.
The next step is really abstracting the physics from the development, not having pretty water.
In every situation the possibilities seem infinite, but only one is optimal. The better a player is, the more often he'll choose that optimal path.
That's why between two very skilled players, the results are consistent (the less skilled loses every time they encounter) but between a skilled player and an unskilled one, they are more random.
The unskilled player surprises the skilled one by constantly choosing unoptimal paths; those actions usually end up costing him a loss, but, sometimes, the weirdness of his movements gets him a kill.
Wasn't that the tripe joke that was already duped in two tripes?
Does this turn it from dupe tripe joke to tripe tripe joke?
(My head hurts)
How much do you have to process the data so it stops counting for data protection issues?
In six months you can intermingle the data items so much there's no way of proving you're actually storing the data and you'd still have what you need of that data.
How does law track the identity line of a data item? Data has no memory and leaves no trace.
Oh, the happy days when I believed I was finding many times my share of stupid people.
Australia has to be invaded before they release all they terrorist, pirate, and probably also ninja DJs to kill us all.
Just hope we're not too late.
Those are a clear example of partially unique, or quite unique, apples.
I've always wondered about the English expression "quite unique".
It seems for English speakers, uniqueness is not binary.
I suppose two instances of double rotating stars make them "somewhat unique in a certain way". Uniqueish, even.
I mean, it's not so hard to imagine two stars circling one another. Don't they study how would that work without waiting to find an instance?
Actually, I supposed astrophysicist first studied the effects of an unobserved configuration and from the results they described what data to expect from such a configuration. Actually finding it was the last step, in my supposition created world.
The article, however, seems to describe the discovery as quite a surprise.
Raytracing allows the implementation of mirrors in 3d environments.
Finally all business software will have the feature of showing the cause of most problems. (See also "Error Id: 10T" and PEBKAC)