I'm glad I got off the train when I did. I've learned so much more about computers since switching to BSDi/BSD/plan9 I can't begin to be greatful enough to Bill G. for that =)
It's not "a good thing" when they change how database connection pooling works.
It used to be recommended practice to stick the db connection in the session object at session.start.
Option Pack 4 changed this behaviour. But it didn't show up until the websites you had already deployed started to get "un-reproducable" errors. The unpooled connections hung around for 30 mins after the last request for that session. Once the site got enough traffic it started killing the application. Could be 6 months, could be a year. Took a while to work that one out, much to the annoyance of my customers, and at my expense "you wrote it, it must be a bug in your code, bug fixes are covered in our agreement". Getting off the MSDN treadmill was glorious.
I mean, come on, it's hardly news that *EVERY* Windows breaks random stuff.
I rememeber the pain I went through after installing NT Option Pack 4, all sorts of stuff changed in operation. It was sorting that mess out that made me drop my "Microsoft Certified Solutions Provider" ambition.
Delete from internet.world where page_text ilike '% beastiality%' or page_text ilike '% lose weight%' or page_text ilike '% refinance%' or page_text ilike '% ebay%' or page_text ilike '% make money fast%' or page_text ilike '% enlarge your%' or page_text ilike '% teens%'; commit;
ok my next try, a slight improvement but certainly annoying to type :
sql = sprintf(SELECT " col1, col2, col3, " FROM " tab1 " LEFT " " JOIN " tab2 ON tab1.pk=tab2.pk " WHERE " col1=%d and col2 in (" SELECT " " DISTINCT " fkey " FROM " tab3 " WHERE " col4=3);", 1);
Why you can't rely on the SQL logging mechanism I really don't know. Postgresql will emit all of the sql executed and label is with ERROR if it didn't execute. I doubt another RDBMS can't do the same.
But that still leaves me the puzzle as to why Theo kicked up all that fuss and when they stuff he was fussing about was removed and only the technical remained, his mind had also changed.
So either the technical benefits have gone or Theo is choosing a less optimal solution based on personal reasons.
The Fourth Edition is available as Free Software under a mixture of Free Software licences (GPL, LGPL, Lucent Public or MIT-template, depending on the component).
Not plan9.
I guess they would be usable. I don't follow OpenBSD discussions but I wonder why they are no longer considered suitable for OpenBSD.
Slashdot Mirror
sed -e 's/security/bugs/g' -e 's/Windows/Linux/g' -e 's/innovation/imitation/g'
I'm glad I got off the train when I did. I've learned so much more about computers since switching to BSDi/BSD/plan9 I can't begin to be greatful enough to Bill G. for that =)
Yeah, I know this now.
I got the pattern from Windows System Journal magazine.
The other details are a bit hazy now =)
If I'd meant Service Pack 4 I would have said it
e commended/NT4OptPk/
http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/downloads/r
It's not "a good thing" when they change how database connection pooling works.
It used to be recommended practice to stick the db connection in the session object at session.start.
Option Pack 4 changed this behaviour. But it didn't show up until the websites you had already deployed started to get "un-reproducable" errors. The unpooled connections hung around for 30 mins after the last request for that session. Once the site got enough traffic it started killing the application. Could be 6 months, could be a year. Took a while to work that one out, much to the annoyance of my customers, and at my expense "you wrote it, it must be a bug in your code, bug fixes are covered in our agreement". Getting off the MSDN treadmill was glorious.
Film at 11!
I mean, come on, it's hardly news that *EVERY* Windows breaks random stuff.
I rememeber the pain I went through after installing NT Option Pack 4, all sorts of stuff changed in operation. It was sorting that mess out that made me drop my "Microsoft Certified Solutions Provider" ambition.
The twentieth century called, said would you like its idea now
http://plan9.bell-labs.com/plan9/
There is more than one OS.
I knew after I typed it, there would be a counter example =)
Descent wins
I've been reading El Reg since they were on 64k.
I have one of their "Integrity, yeah we've heard of it" t-shirts.
They used to have a "Click here to buy a story on our site" link.
And they've ALWAYS had "Biting the hand that feeds IT" as the tagline.
Delete from internet.world
where page_text ilike '% beastiality%'
or page_text ilike '% lose weight%'
or page_text ilike '% refinance%'
or page_text ilike '% ebay%'
or page_text ilike '% make money fast%'
or page_text ilike '% enlarge your%'
or page_text ilike '% teens%';
commit;
Surely BOTH would be better ?
The people that implement list 1 are generally not the people that implement list 2.
Quake was the first 3d game
punishment rarely works, it makes the victim aggressive
reward works great
ok my next try, a slight improvement but certainly annoying to type :
sql = sprintf(SELECT " col1, col2, col3, " FROM " tab1 " LEFT " " JOIN " tab2 ON tab1.pk=tab2.pk " WHERE " col1=%d and col2 in (" SELECT " " DISTINCT " fkey " FROM " tab3 " WHERE " col4=3);", 1);
Why you can't rely on the SQL logging mechanism I really don't know.
Postgresql will emit all of the sql executed and label is with ERROR if it didn't execute. I doubt another RDBMS can't do the same.
Yeah, I can see why you'd think that approach was much less error prone !
sql = sprintf("%s col1, col2, col3, %s tab1 %s %s tab2 ON tab1.pk=tab2.pk %s col1=%d and col2 in (%s %s fkey %s tab3 %s col4=3);", SELECT, FROM, LEFT, JOIN, WHERE, 1, SELECT, DISTINCT, FROM, WHERE);
res = PQexec(sql);
> if you do it the wrong way you get unreadable code
come on then, show me an improvement
But that still leaves me the puzzle as to why Theo kicked up all that fuss and when they stuff he was fussing about was removed and only the technical remained, his mind had also changed.
So either the technical benefits have gone or Theo is choosing a less optimal solution based on personal reasons.
surely not !
That's a similar but not same compiler suite from Inferno
http://www.vitanuova.com/inferno/
The Fourth Edition is available as Free Software under a mixture of Free Software licences (GPL, LGPL, Lucent Public or MIT-template, depending on the component).
Not plan9.
I guess they would be usable. I don't follow OpenBSD discussions but I wonder why they are no longer considered suitable for OpenBSD.
this part
"The new license is utterly unacceptable for use in a BSD project." - Theo de Raadt
and ?
Theo means "just like the plan9 compilers", but he doesn't like the license Lucent offer for them.
Why do you think abusing women is "deserved" ?
> Anyone installing a compiler on a production web server should be shot.
whereas hosting your firewall, dns, database, webserver, ftp & email on the same box is just fine and dandy
Get more experience then
Bugle playing and electronics, I gotta get me some of that !