Slashdot Mirror


User: Thinboy00

Thinboy00's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,572
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,572

  1. Re:Nobody wants... on Judge OKs Settlement In Yahoo Shareholder Suit · · Score: 0, Troll

    Relax. In a year, Yahoo will be like Circuit City, and if you show up early enough at the Big Closeout Event, you'll be able to buy the "You've Got Mail" wave file, along with toilet paper rolls and the portrait of Jerry Yang that he used to whack off to in his private bathroom.

    I thought "You've got mail" was AOL.

    And what idiot decided that was troll?

  2. Re:I'd be happier to see tighter tech requirements on CA Senator Pushing For Tightened Data Breach Notification · · Score: 1

    The problem is that most voters are too stupid to understand what you're talking about, whereas food is another story entirely. Also there's lobbyists, as usual.

  3. Re:voice control on Ideas For the Next Generation In Human-Computer Interfaces · · Score: 1

    Yes he does:
    1. Computer BSODs
    2. "Fuck"
    3. Computer reboots (or not, given you have a BSOD in the way)

  4. Re:Lojban on Wolfram Promises Computing That Answers Questions · · Score: 1

    is the answer to this question "no"?

    [snip]

    five.

  5. Re:No Script Bragging -- please stop on UAC Whitelist Hole In Windows 7 · · Score: 1

    How many? 5? By comparison, how many are there in JScript?

    Also, which is easier to write in?

  6. Re:No Script Bragging -- please stop on UAC Whitelist Hole In Windows 7 · · Score: 1

    UAC was "forced" in the sense that it was on by default and you had to go to the control panel to turn if off (not rocket science, but people are stupid). Therefore, it was more of a nuisance than is NoScript, which is only present on your machine if you want it. If you don't want it, have fun de-virusing your computer.

  7. Re:No Script Bragging -- please stop on UAC Whitelist Hole In Windows 7 · · Score: 1

    NoScript has clickjacking protection (IE doesn't: A while ago IE made it possible to prevent framebusting scripts from working by adding a parameter to the iframe. Now there's a header that can be used to emulate a framebuster script, but that only works if the browser supports it -- i.e. IE. MS marketed it as clickjacking protection, but it's really nothing more than a protection every other browser already has.)

  8. Re:Is Dreamweaver good? on Dreamweaver Is Dying; Long Live Drupal! · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    fine, use Wordpress etc. Just don't try to produce raw HTML files; that would be like buying a (very large and complex) box of tools when you could just buy a Starter's kit in (the metaphor just fell apart in my mind. Sorry.)

  9. Re:Is Dreamweaver good? on Dreamweaver Is Dying; Long Live Drupal! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I later realized, that such types only get their jobs, because their bosses are such types too. Up to the owner of the company. Which is the only person of the company in many cases.
    And then they only have to live up to the clients' expectations. Of course the client never knows, that you could save him 90% of the cash by actually using real programming concepts like re-usability and modularity.

    Next time anyone gets fired from a job due to their boss's incompetence, please tell a tabloid about how much money you could save them. And back it up with a slashdot/dailywtf story so the technocracy (i.e. the slashdot etc. community) will know that the (un)published story is in fact grounded in fact, or at least is valid and/or sound.

    Please do this, so that we can all have something funny to read, and so that the client has some clue that he's being ripped off by a salesman who is too stupid to even take advantage of the high price.

    To mods:No, this is not, in fact, sarcastic.

  10. Re:Dreamweaver's more for coders than designers on Dreamweaver Is Dying; Long Live Drupal! · · Score: 3, Informative

    The other thing is that Wordpress etc either are or could be standards compliant. When was the last time Dreamweaver gave you standards compliant code (Actually, as a slashdot user, you probably never used Dreamweaver. I did once (for school, mandatory, but they taught us HTML too.).)?

  11. Re:Is Dreamweaver good? on Dreamweaver Is Dying; Long Live Drupal! · · Score: 1

    I think I'd like SCREEM (X)HTML editor more useful if it didn't crash so often... If it didn't, it would be the perfect compromise; it is fundamentally a text editor, but it can generate CSS and DOCTYPE declarations, use templates, etc. so you don't have to know everything to write anything. Also, in my experience it tends to write non-bloated, standards compliant code. Please don't use it for a website involving serious money though, or at least, don't sue me if you do.

  12. Re:Is Dreamweaver good? on Dreamweaver Is Dying; Long Live Drupal! · · Score: 1

    Use Krita. It has the features Gimp lacks (like the CMYK colorspace IIRC).

  13. Re:Remember GIF on The Real Reason For Microsoft's TomTom Lawsuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    IANAL, but the patent seems to be VERY broad. It basically covers "everything that's not FAT12/16 and is within the same class of stuff as FAT32" (of course such patents are invalid IIRC, but that doesn't mean it isn't expensive and difficult to defend against a lawsuit). In other words, if you make a FAT-lookalike (or even an incompatible filesystem that has similar functionality, even with a completely different underlying structure), Microsoft might still decide it wants to sue you. IANAL, this isn't legal advice, use of the word "you" instead of "one" does not make it legal advice.

  14. Re:non-issue on Doctors Silencing Online Patient Reviews Via Contract · · Score: 1

    [snip]
    I'm not from the US, the thing that grabbed my attention in TFS was "the pile of contracts your doctor dumps on your lap". Why is there a pile of contracts in the first place?

    IANAL, but:
    1. So you don't sue them (but see also good samaritan laws)
    2. To make sure you are legally required to pay your bill (unless you are in an ER)
    3. To clog the tubes.
    4. To sneak stuff like this past you without your noticing.
    5. To ensure their lawyer retains a job.
    6. There is no rule six.
    7. Because some people will just sign anything you give them, much as most lusers will hit "OK"/"Yes" on dialog boxes without reading them.

  15. Re:Civil Procedure Question on Red Hat Hit With Patent Suit Over JBoss · · Score: 1

    What about when that judge told the RIAA to not combine multiple does under one lawsuit again and the RIAA blew it off completely (I'm too lazy to find a link. Sorry.)?

  16. Re:History in the Making on MediaSentry & RIAA Expert Under Attack · · Score: 1

    At this point, I don't think the RIAA is even trying to profit; they're just trying to survive (albeit by cruel and unusual means).

  17. Re:Red? on MediaSentry & RIAA Expert Under Attack · · Score: 1

    OP doesn't have a * so the latter is implausible.

  18. Re:Duh? on MediaSentry & RIAA Expert Under Attack · · Score: 1
  19. Re:Why are they attacking him? on MediaSentry & RIAA Expert Under Attack · · Score: 1

    [snip]

    If songs always cost 10cents, though, I'm guessing the pirate market would dry up quite a bit. It just wouldn't be worth the work.

    -Dan

    It might be worth the thrill of breaking the law though.

  20. Re:owned. on MediaSentry & RIAA Expert Under Attack · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It would be good if this argument made its way into the US legal system, but for all the flak that UK judges get for ignorance, I suspect they are smarter when it comes to technology.

    It's more general than that. The ENTIRE EU is more clueful when it comes to tech than the ENTIRE US.

  21. Re:I actually just tried the Kindle II... on Reading the New York Times On a Kindle 2 · · Score: 1

    [snip]

    That said, if someone has a better recommendation for what I'm trying to do, I'm all ears.

    -Trillian

    A copyright notice? A polite note? Both?

  22. Re:Forget it on Open Source In Public K-12 Schools? · · Score: 1

    I thought that GNU/Linux users (let's use the politically correct idiom, since you mentioned OSS ideals)[snip]

    OSS == Open source software == practical.
    Free software == idealistic.

    rms is the person who coined "GNU/Linux" and "Free software". If we're going to say "OSS", I think we can get away with "Linux"

    The tools themselves are credited; they all have GNU in their titles (see the man pages); thus we don't need to credit them again in the name of the whole thing, especially when doing so confuses everyone who doesn't follow these things.

  23. Re:Windows = game OS for x86 on Obama Helicopter Security Breached By File Sharing · · Score: 1

    If that's the case, WTF was Vista?

  24. Re:The choice on Google Joins EU Antitrust Case Against Microsoft · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know about you, but the only website I've ever had problems with in IE was .... Slashdot.
     

    This? Now try it with ~any browser other than IE.

    For the lazy (source):
    ~Any up-to-date-but-still-stable browser renders it correctly (read: the page doesn't look munged), except for IE, chrome, safari, and other webkit-based browsers. ~Any RC/alpha/etc gets a score upwards of 80, except for IE.

  25. Re:Why? on Google Joins EU Antitrust Case Against Microsoft · · Score: 1

    it's more of a burden on the author of the website than on the browser vendor [snip]

    Oops, that should say user.