In England, castles are carefully placed around 20 miles apart so that the peasants who needed help could have received help on foot in half a day from any troups, or in a couple of hours on horseback.
It also allowed fast access to a fresh horse for messengers.
Server 2003 wasn't really any more stable than XP.
I started in my job in 2004, the business had 2 servers, an NT4 and 2003 server, they both argued over who should run the network, consequently they crashed and took the network down with it every 5 days.
I took the NT4 server out and replaced with another 2003 server and this uptime went up to 60-70 days between reboots.
After installing SP1 onto the 2003 servers, now we have 6 of them, I have today an uptime of 604 days, on the main file store. (the last reboot was to install SP1)
Other servers running exchange have a lower uptime of around 60-70 days, and SQL 120-180 days.
You cannot say 2003 server is as stable as XP, it just doesn't work as an analogy.
It either that or I'm setting some new records here for uptime, on Server 2003. Its so stable I don't even want to install SP2 for 2003.
Why have encryption at the hardware level when you can use e.g. Linux's crypto device-mapper tool? That also allows you to keep certain partition encrypted for privacy and other partitions unencrypted for performance. There is certain ring of truth to what you say... However disk encryption on the whole can and will slow computers down, not significantly on modern computers but it does. By transferring the overhead from the CPU to the processor built into the hard drive there is no slow down to the overall performance of the computer I don't know if any of you linux fans out there have performance/overhead stats on using the device-mapper tool, but for someone who is trying to get the best out of their processor, moving this process from software to hardware is the ideal solution.
I was wondering if anyone had any alternatives to recommend for anyone looking for a decent registrar? I use webhost4life, Some people have run into tech support issues with them, and I've had a few run ins also on those lines, especially when you work in the UK, and they are based on the pacific coast, but on the whole they are not that bad.
Slashdot Mirror
My Dad always said "If you aim for the moon, you'll probably miss."
Shows you what he knew...
Assuming they didn't mess up on the metric>feet>metric conversions.
Galaxy is greek for Milky. But then again everything is all greek to me.
Much like planet is greek for wonderer.
Go on mod me funny and informative.
In England, castles are carefully placed around 20 miles apart so that the peasants who needed help could have received help on foot in half a day from any troups, or in a couple of hours on horseback.
It also allowed fast access to a fresh horse for messengers.
We pander too much to the politically correct...
Lets look at the last pandemics...
Asiatic (Russian) Flu 1889
Spanish Flu 1918
Asian Flu 1957
Hong Kong Flu 1968
The precident has already been created in using the name of the first case/s to name the flu pandemic virus.
No one should be able to object to the name Mexican Flu 2009.
You mean hamageddon
Ring a ring of nachos
A pocket full of tissues
Arriba Arriba
We all fall down.
I'm saving my copy of windows ME just for the cylon revolt.
I've got a Mac book to interface with alien technology in case this sort of thing happens, so between us we should be ok.
Having whacked the figures into excel and totalled them up.
The results are...
IE8 88.3 Secs
Chrome 88.32 Secs
Firefox 95.62 Secs
Way to go IE8 you are 2 hundredths of a second faster than Chrome overall...
Nothing to see here move along...
Call it a hunch.
Network Location Awareness (NLA) can cause such problems.
Disable and stop the service in services.msc
It's not needed unless you are changing networks a lot, and even then it can get by without it.
It took me a while to figure out when I was getting exactly the same results. Typically the s
I think that there is a more interesting point.
Who paid for the stamp?
If the company did, then the letter is from the company to the recipient, therefore, the company would be entitled to look inside the letter.
That was until the billy goats gruff came to town.
They closed that business down faster than the monopolies and mergers commission.
I for one would like to see a complete overhaul of domain names, and the URL format.
http://www.domainnname.type.country/directory1/Subdirectory2/page1.html
Should become
http://www/country/type/domainname/directory1/subdirectory2/page1.html
In my opinion. Not that my opinion has ever been regarded as important.
Russian Proverb "Better is the enemy of good enough"
I wonder what knock of Nigel thinks about all this... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlhdK5Yl8u0
How can this be informative? Please mod it interesting at least!
Server 2003 wasn't really any more stable than XP.
I started in my job in 2004, the business had 2 servers, an NT4 and 2003 server, they both argued over who should run the network, consequently they crashed and took the network down with it every 5 days.
I took the NT4 server out and replaced with another 2003 server and this uptime went up to 60-70 days between reboots.
After installing SP1 onto the 2003 servers, now we have 6 of them, I have today an uptime of 604 days, on the main file store. (the last reboot was to install SP1)
Other servers running exchange have a lower uptime of around 60-70 days, and SQL 120-180 days.
You cannot say 2003 server is as stable as XP, it just doesn't work as an analogy.
It either that or I'm setting some new records here for uptime, on Server 2003. Its so stable I don't even want to install SP2 for 2003.
I mean, he knew where the body was buried.
He had the location of it stored in his Journal.
That means we can hold up signs in 144 point fonts. F*&!ING* CULT
and in 12 point. * "FOOLING"
Wait for it...
So by using GPS they can find the "dead" centre.
sheesh... felt like a pun was in order...
thank you I'm here all week... Unless modded -5, GET OFF SLASHDOT...
However disk encryption on the whole can and will slow computers down, not significantly on modern computers but it does.
By transferring the overhead from the CPU to the processor built into the hard drive there is no slow down to the overall performance of the computer
I don't know if any of you linux fans out there have performance/overhead stats on using the device-mapper tool, but for someone who is trying to get the best out of their processor, moving this process from software to hardware is the ideal solution.
Switch to another provider. Vote with your feet.
The only problem with geeky nerds is they are probably very smelly ones.
I know mine are...
Better is the enemy of good enough.
They'll probably miss...