Slashdot Mirror


Let's Rename Swine Flu As "Colbert Flu"

Bruce Perens writes "The World Health Organization will no longer refer to Virus A(H1N1) as 'Swine Flu,' citing ethnic reactions to 'swine,' for example among middle-eastern cultures who feel that swine are unclean. Or, is it because meat packers are concerned that people might stop eating pork in fear of the virus? WHO suggests that the public select a new name for the virus. I suggest that we all start calling it The Colbert Flu, after the comedian and fake pundit who asked his audience to stuff a NASA poll so that a Space Station module would be named after him. What can we do to make the name stick?"

607 comments

  1. Dear Bruce... by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Call it the Colbert flu? I don't think so. Colbert was just being funny, which is his job. It's why people watch him, and why they'll go so far as to stuff a poll. Plus, it was good publicity for the space station, led to an astronaut on his show, and even the naming of some widget or other after him. Treadmill? Whatever.

    Anyway, Colbert is generally a positive influence. His "fake punditry" is pungent social comment, with the intent of nudging the his audience to think about these issues. While being funny, which keeps them coming back. All in all, a good thing. So I don't think naming a killer flu after him is appropriate. Entirely the wrong set of connotations, you see.

    Flus are annoying, they show up wether you want them to or not, right in the middle of something else you were doing. Vaguely similar to your suggestion we name a nasty flu after a cool guy showing up on slashdot.

    So in honor of your annoying and inappropriate post, I'm simply going to counter-suggest that we name H1N1 after you instead: The "Perens Flu." Does that seem fair to you?

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Dear Bruce... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Funny

      Flus are annoying, they show up wether you want them to or not, right in the middle of something else you were doing.

      Ok, so how about The Thompson Flu.

    2. Re:Dear Bruce... by Smidge207 · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about the kdawson flu?

      =Smidge=

      --
      Is it just my observation, or is eldavojohn an idiot?
    3. Re:Dear Bruce... by immakiku · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget that there was an avenue by which people can easily vote to name the space module "Colbert". This seems like a poorly thought out prank you're pulling. At least you disguised it under some action news.

    4. Re:Dear Bruce... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Heh, Colbert might go for it though...The whole massively self-aggrandizing nature of his stage personality would eat it up.

      Be a lot easier to just call it the "Mexico Influenza" though. That's pretty much the standard for these things.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    5. Re:Dear Bruce... by Thornburg · · Score: 5, Funny

      How about the kdawson flu?

      =Smidge=

      I second that motion.

    6. Re:Dear Bruce... by wjousts · · Score: 5, Funny

      Flus are annoying, they show up wether you want them to or not, right in the middle of something else you were doing.

      Mother-in-law flu?

    7. Re:Dear Bruce... by wjousts · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Anyway, Colbert is generally a positive influence. His "fake punditry" is pungent social comment, with the intent of nudging the his audience to think about these issues. While being funny, which keeps them coming back. All in all, a good thing.

      Good, except some people can't tell the difference

    8. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Since you're suggesting to change the name to colbert flu.., why not take it upon yourself and call it perens' flu!

    9. Re:Dear Bruce... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Funny

      Try to exercise a bit of sensitivity... they're concerned that a disease is named after something that is unclean.

      Perhaps they would like the Purity Flu?

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    10. Re:Dear Bruce... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, I felt that with Colbert's desire to have multiple things named after him, the list of things is here, there would be a sort of "symmetry" to naming something that he would not want after him.

      Obviously a simple influenza virus is insufficient to name after me. I'd want to have named after me an itch that you can't reach and slowly drives you crazy.

    11. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I'd vote for Smidge flu.

    12. Re:Dear Bruce... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Funny

      Personally, since this is a KILLER virus, we should name it Hans Reiser Virus.

      yeah, I know, I'm sick.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    13. Re:Dear Bruce... by Stile+65 · · Score: 3, Funny

      The "Perens Scabies?"

      That sounds marketable!

      --
      I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
    14. Re:Dear Bruce... by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Spanish Inquisition flu.
      After all, nobody expected it.

    15. Re:Dear Bruce... by someone1234 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, Colbert IS annoying to some, including me.
      We still don't see if this new virus is deadly or just hot air.
      Perfect to name it Colbert.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    16. Re:Dear Bruce... by DriedClexler · · Score: 0

      Call me crazy, but I actually think it's pretty noble for Colbert to volunteer his name for the swine flu. It helps clear up misconceptions about the flu (Egypt pointlessly slaughtered a lot of pigs because of its name), and at the same time makes the sacrifice of debasing Colbert's own name by association with something bad. Plus, "Colbert" is short an unobjectionable, which you can't say about "Mexican flu", "North American flu", and "AH1N1 flu", the other alternatives.

      No, I'm not being sarcastic: his narcissism can actually do some good here.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    17. Re:Dear Bruce... by stewbacca · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Is a symptom of kdawson flu horrible writing?

      The World Health Organization will no longer refer to Virus A(H1N1) as 'Swine Flu,' citing ethnic reactions to 'swine,' for example among middle-eastern cultures who feel that swine are unclean.

    18. Re:Dear Bruce... by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Be a lot easier to just call it the "Mexico Influenza" though. That's pretty much the standard for these things.

      Which can get you kicked off forums in California for being racist

    19. Re:Dear Bruce... by ManlySpork · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Flus are annoying, they show up wether you want them to or not, right in the middle of something else you were doing. Vaguely similar to your suggestion we name a nasty flu after a cool guy showing up on slashdot.

      How about we call it "The Spanish inquisition flu".

    20. Re:Dear Bruce... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      bwahahahahahahah....that's the best proof conservative are dumb I've ever seen!

    21. Re:Dear Bruce... by c0p0n · · Score: 1

      Cobra flu.

      Because anything called Cobra just kicks ass.

      --

      Your head a splode
    22. Re:Dear Bruce... by robkill · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps, but Perens Pox would probably work even better

      --
      DMCA - Chilling free speech since 1998.
    23. Re:Dear Bruce... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Colbert is funny now- but the naming things is getting a bit creepy.

      I saw Rush Limbaugh transform from being a stage personality to being the man and there are similarities.

      Some parts of Colbert are very ironic-- but some parts (like the naming) are what they are and pose a risk he will begin believing his own stage persona.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    24. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Fuck California and their Pelosi democrats that want to bury everyone's rights in the interest of being politically correct. I guess if it's not the right-wing crying terrorists for their reasons for trying to circumvent free speech it's the left-wing doing so as to not offend anyone or anything non-white male.

    25. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you must be referring to the Phantom Itch. I'm sorry sir, that one was already named after a Bruce Phantom.

    26. Re:Dear Bruce... by Bitmap0023 · · Score: 1

      Oooh! being a Thompson myself I whole heartedly endorse the use of this name, while hoping for a spectacular death toll to recast the name in notoriety.

    27. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in honor of your annoying and inappropriate post, I'm simply going to counter-suggest that we name H1N1 after you instead: The "Perens Flu."

      How about the kdawson flu?

      To be fair, let's name it Dawnson-Perens Flu.

    28. Re:Dear Bruce... by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 4, Funny

      These 2 laws of the holiest of holies this would be breaking!

      One, the ridiculing of the holiest body of christanity, we the inquisition!
      Two, the use of skit material not created by you but created by the holiest body of christianity, we the inquisition!
      And three, the countenance upon which you stated the material... THREE!

      Mark these 3 laws the holiest of holies that thou dost mock!

    29. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roland Piquepaille flu - a fitting memmorial.

    30. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His "fake punditry" is pungent social comment,

      It is?

    31. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flus are annoying, they show up wether you want them to or not

      That's how our specie evolves you insensitive clod!

      -- sentient virus at aol.com

    32. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that motion. I'll let it slip to a few high profile celebs that I know and "swine" flu will be no more.

      Perens flu FTW!

    33. Re:Dear Bruce... by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      Call me crazy, but I actually think it's pretty noble for Colbert to volunteer his name for the swine flu.

      He didn't volunteer his name. The original poster simply suggested it, for who knows what reason. As far as I know, Colbert has no desire to have the flu named after him.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    34. Re:Dear Bruce... by denshao2 · · Score: 1

      It's annoying when the swine fly away. http://www.blog-stalk.com/showpost.php?ID=323

    35. Re:Dear Bruce... by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      That's what grand theft auto/hot coffee is for.

    36. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Obviously a simple influenza virus is insufficient to name after me. I'd want to have named after me an itch that you can't reach and slowly drives you crazy.

      Didn't they already name perenthetical comments after you?

      (Never let spell-check get in the way of a bad pun.)

    37. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the "Manager Flu" would be better.

    38. Re:Dear Bruce... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The question is - which people?

    39. Re:Dear Bruce... by undercanopy · · Score: 1

      O'Reilly flu ftw!

      --
      -- D-23994, Muff#2613
    40. Re:Dear Bruce... by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Peren-noia

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    41. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I try to pronounce A(H1N1), it comes out like "a heinie"

      This makes it less unclean how??

    42. Re:Dear Bruce... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      I was astonished that in an early Obama meeting, a woman demanded that he meet with Colbert. Some people really don't get the joke.

    43. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Premature Ejaculation Flu???

    44. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flus are annoying, they show up wether you want them to or not, right in the middle of something else you were doing. Vaguely similar to your suggestion we name a nasty flu after a cool guy showing up on slashdot.

      This alone makes me agree with the idea of naming it the Colbert Flu.

    45. Re:Dear Bruce... by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      If he can encourage the abuse a public resource in the name of a joke, he can take a joke and have a flu named after him. He has a history of such encouragement, from Wikipedia to the NASA poll. While I think he's an excellent comedian in many respects, he deserves a bit of comeuppance.

    46. Re:Dear Bruce... by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

      No. L:et's be completely poltticvallu corect and just start numbering them.
      I suggest the "2009-0001 flu".

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    47. Re:Dear Bruce... by Trikki+Nikki! · · Score: 1

      When I try to pronounce A(H1N1), it comes out like "a heinie"

      This makes it less unclean how??

      One of the radio stations here is already calling it the heinie (sp?) flu. It gave me a few giggles, and then a large fear of being stuck on a toilet for weeks on end if I was infected. At that point my giggles ceased.

      --
      i r in ur /.s girling up ur storiez
    48. Re:Dear Bruce... by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Funny

      The difference is that Colbert is actively mocking his stage persona.... Rush Limbaugh, by contrast was always just a pig.

      Hey! Maybe we could call it the Limbaugh Flu....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    49. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a recent Diggnation Kevin and Alex said they were going to fight Colbert next time he tried to name something, so.. ..the Digg Disease?

    50. Re:Dear Bruce... by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why not call it Kung Flu...after all, it does kick your ass pretty well.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    51. Re:Dear Bruce... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Be a lot easier to just call it the "Mexico Influenza" though. That's pretty much the standard for these things.

      Which can get you kicked off forums in California for being racist"

      Why in the world would that even be thought of as even remotely racist?!?!?!

      If it came out of Mexico, it would be Mexico/Mexican Flu

      I mean, we do still get the Asian Flu occasionally don't we? Named for the region it comes from?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    52. Re:Dear Bruce... by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Call it the Colbert flu? I don't think so. Colbert was just being funny...

      So are we.

      > Anyway, Colbert is generally a positive influence.

      Only if you agree with his politics.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    53. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mexico... Spain... do the Hispanics just have it in for the rest of the world?

    54. Re:Dear Bruce... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      How about the Scientologist flu?

      Although Anonymous probably would rather stuff the box with marblecake or something instead. (And I'd say to stuff it with Xenu or body thetans, but Scienos would agree that that's bad.)

    55. Re:Dear Bruce... by Macrat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why in the world would that even be thought of as even remotely racist?!?!?!

      This is the same California that considers calling an "undocumented immigrant" an "illegal alien" as racist also.

    56. Re:Dear Bruce... by eclectro · · Score: 1

      yeah, I know, I'm sick.

      When did you start feeling symptoms of the Colbert Flu?

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    57. Re:Dear Bruce... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      How about the Jack "CarrotTop-RickRoller" Tompson flu.

      Hey, this reminds me of, how in Civilization II, a disease was given your name, if your game went badly. ^^
      The Dick Cheney flu? Sounds fitting. ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    58. Re:Dear Bruce... by The+Spoonman · · Score: 1

      Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner! Seriously, I support it 100%

      --
      Which is more painful? Going to work or gouging your eye out with a spoon? Find out!
      http://www.workorspoon.com
    59. Re:Dear Bruce... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing is: it is swine flu

      No. It's influenza A(H1N1)--the same broad type as "Spanish Flu." "Swine" adds nothing to the discussion, and leads people into irrelevant tangents--"Well, I don't eat pork, so I'm safe".

    60. Re:Dear Bruce... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Anyway, Colbert is generally a positive influence. His "fake punditry" is pungent social comment, with the intent of nudging the his audience to think about these issues. While being funny, which keeps them coming back. All in all, a good thing. So I don't think naming a killer flu after him is appropriate. Entirely the wrong set of connotations, you see.

      Funnily enough, I read a survey that showed that 27% of people who identified as conservative/Republican believed that "Colbert was making serious points, delivered in a humorous manner".

      Ye gods.

    61. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the Dubya flu?

    62. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that anything like the Mexican Clap? Because it's a doozy as well...

    63. Re:Dear Bruce... by Ash+Vince · · Score: 4, Informative

      The thing is: it is swine flu.

      Actually, its not. The original swine flu was not able to jump from human to human, you could only catch it from being in close contact with pigs. This flu is actually two parts swine flu, one part bird flu and one part human flu. Although this is mostly swine, the other elements are what has enabled to it spread through the human population as it never has before.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swine_influenza

      If it was still just good old swine flu, it would not be romping through the human population with reckless abandon.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    64. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your assumption that conservatives are dumb is the best proof I've ever seen that you're pretty damn stupid yourself.

    65. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Only if you agree with his politics.

      That self-righteous asshats have no business infringing on our Constitutional freedoms? Yeah, what kind of psycho buys into that bullshit?

    66. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say we call it the WHO Flu, after the people that raised the pandemic level to 5.

    67. Re:Dear Bruce... by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmmm. Perhaps the Cheney flu? You do not want to be shot with it.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    68. Re:Dear Bruce... by kharchenko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How does that work? Do you just watch his show to get annoyed? I could see how one could find a TV host offensive, dumb, sleazy (picturing Rush to come up with these), but to get consistently annoyed by someone who you'd only watch by your own free choice is rare.

    69. Re:Dear Bruce... by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      Only if you agree with his politics.

      I personally do not think that you have to agree with someone point of view in order to recognise their contribution to society as a positive one. There have been many people who I disagree with but think that their tenaciousness at presenting an argument is valuable to society. I personally disagree with most republican politicians but I would hate to see an America where there was only one party.

      I also believe that sometimes humour is the most effective way to press home a point. Sometimes it is clearly inappropriate but at other times it is a perfect fit. I am certainly not saying that Colbert has always got it right but sometimes he has and that alone makes him a positive influence.

      Political Satire has a long and rich history in most western political systems and has certainly been a positive influence overall.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    70. Re:Dear Bruce... by geekboy642 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would be ironic to record a song titled "Ironic" and have the lyrics report a series of events which are unlucky, rather than ironic.

      Ah, so that explains Alanis Morisette. It was deeply meta-ironic. See, now I can enjoy the song again.

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
    71. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      killer? more like filler for the news networks who are tired of reporting on how the world is coming to an end because of the democrats power. because bush was certainly on the fast track to recovery, after he put us on the fast track to our economic collapse. but that aside you are only slightly more likely to be killed by this flu than assaulted by a unicorn so this should be the unicorn flu. as the daily show pointed out you are more likely to be killed by the bullet flu or tequila flu in mexico at this point. i mean thousands die of the regular flu every year.

    72. Re:Dear Bruce... by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      Israel already tried that, but the Mexican officials took offense, so they changed it back.

    73. Re:Dear Bruce... by brunes69 · · Score: 0

      If you think Cobert is annoying and full of hot air then you don't get the show at all, because that is exactly what heis trying to portray, on purpose, via his stage persona. That is why it is so funny.

      People like you who think he is being that way naturally do not get the humor.

    74. Re:Dear Bruce... by bitt3n · · Score: 1

      Flus are annoying, they show up wether you want them to or not, right in the middle of something else you were doing

      SWAT-team flu?

    75. Re:Dear Bruce... by daveime · · Score: 1

      Manbearpig flu ?

    76. Re:Dear Bruce... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Which forum? I'm in California and I call it the Mexican Flue and I'm still here.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    77. Re:Dear Bruce... by amliebsch · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would hate to see an America where there was only one party.

      Uh...I've got some bad news for you.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    78. Re:Dear Bruce... by James+Skarzinskas · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You don't have to disagree with him (or misunderstand him) to dislike him, his stage act, or his methods. Colbert is hardly the avantgarde of highbrow, sophisticated satire.

    79. Re:Dear Bruce... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 5, Funny

      This flu is actually two parts swine flu, one part bird flu and one part human flu.

      If this is true then we have no choice but to name it accordingly...

      ...ManBirdPig Flu!!

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    80. Re:Dear Bruce... by Nick+Ives · · Score: 1

      Supporters of the neo-con project, obviously. He got on stage next to President Bush and said "we all know reality has a liberal bias" and on a recent episode he savaged former Senator Ted Stevens for a statement he made after getting the bribery accusations against him dismissed.

      Colbert may be conservative in certain senses (whatever that means in modern American politics) but he's clearly not a supporter of the neo-conservatives.

      --
      Nick
    81. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it appears that this is a pretty mild flu as the flu goes. Unless something happens to radically change its lethality then we should be proposing something like 'Head fake flu'. For perspective, look at our old nemesis H5N1, if H1N1 were similarly lethal, we would have hundreds if not thousands dead and seriously ill. Even the 'normal' seasonal flu is killing more people (600 or more per day assuming an annual total of 250,000).

    82. Re:Dear Bruce... by Spad · · Score: 1

      It's been big news in the UK today (Slow news day, obviously) that we've got our first case of human to human transmission of Colbert Flu; I'm not entirely sure that we can classify it as "romping" quite yet.

    83. Re:Dear Bruce... by midicase · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So all those people are wrong that call me "white" even though I am two parts Cherokee, one part Swedish and one part Russian?

    84. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "naming something that he would not want after him."

      You presume there is such a thing. Honestly, I think he'd eat it up.

      Mind you, I'm in favor of the notion - I'm a huge fan.

    85. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why you should leave comedy to the professionals. Hey Colbert likes stuff named after him, let's name a flu that's killed hundreds after him. Yuck yuck!

    86. Re:Dear Bruce... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > I read a survey that showed that 27% of people who identified as conservative/Republican
      > believed that "Colbert was making serious points, delivered in a humorous manner".

      Whereas 87% of people who identified as liberal/Democrat agreed with them, differing only on the exact nature of the points made.

      > Ye gods.

      Indeed.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    87. Re:Dear Bruce... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Mexico isn't a race. It's a country. If I said, "The Hispanic Influenza" or "The Mexican Influenza" then that might be a valid criticism.

      Though, if it makes you happy, we could call it the "Cancun Flu" though, the Cancun tourism board probably wouldn't thank us.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    88. Re:Dear Bruce... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Be a lot easier to just call it the "Mexico Influenza" though. That's pretty much the standard for these things.

      Israel tried doing just that recently (for similarly stupid reasons of pigs not being kosher), and Mexico went up in arms at the idea. Israelis backtracked.

      Meanwhile, Muslim countries are using the excuse to butcher as many pigs as they can (as pig farms are owned by non-Muslims), and a bunch of countries with long history of rows with the West (such as Russia) use the opportunity to restrict pork imports.

      I swear, it looks like one big circus sometimes.

    89. Re:Dear Bruce... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, I know that the personality of that annoying foreigner lady on MAD TV is supposed to be annoying.. I get the joke, but in the end, I just find her annoying. The fact that the grand parent doesn't share your sense of humor does not necessarily mean he fails to "get it."

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    90. Re:Dear Bruce... by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      Just because you have the right to be a bigoted simpleton, does not mean that we don't have the right to call you out on it.

    91. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Manbirdpig flu. That's what I'm going with.

    92. Re:Dear Bruce... by LeonN · · Score: 1

      Hey, why not just call it the Conficker Flu? its only a matter of time before the virus becomes self aware and is able to inject humans anyhow with the rate it is spreading/progressing ;-)

      --
      http://freelinuxguides.wikidot.com
    93. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It would be ironic to record a song titled "Ironic" and have the lyrics report a series of events which are unlucky, rather than ironic."


      "Irony isn't what most Americans think it is. Do try to learn English."

      Oooh, Oooh...I've got one too... it would be really ironic to chastise Americans for the act of a Canadian.

    94. Re:Dear Bruce... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Actually. at the beginning, it was pretty clear to me (and a fair amount of others) that Rush was saying the words but didn't really believe them. It was just an act to get an audience. Just like, in Houston, we had this really sweet guy "Allan Van Black" but his radio personality was to infuriate people. People just called to try and argue with him and he would own them in really vicious ways-- but it was an act and when the show ended he reverted to who he was before.

      There were a lot of discussions about whether he really believed it and finally he chimed in, said he did, and then he got a lot more serious.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    95. Re:Dear Bruce... by Xtifr · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Irony" is also a form of sarcasm, but reserved for observation of unfortunate associations.

      Goodness, where do people come up with this stuff?

      irony [ahy-ruh-nee, ahy-er-]
      -noun, plural -nies.
      1. the use of words to convey a meaning that is the opposite of its literal meaning: the irony of her reply, "How nice!" when I said I had to work all weekend.
      2. Literature.
      a. a technique of indicating, as through character or plot development, an intention or attitude opposite to that which is actually or ostensibly stated.
      b. (esp. in contemporary writing) a manner of organizing a work so as to give full expression to contradictory or complementary impulses, attitudes, etc., esp. as a means of indicating detachment from a subject, theme, or emotion.
      3. Socratic irony.
      4. dramatic irony.
      5. an outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, expected.
      6. the incongruity of this.
      7. an objectively sardonic style of speech or writing.
      8. an objectively or humorously sardonic utterance, disposition, quality, etc.

      Your definition seems to meet #5, but Colbert makes heavy use of definition #1 (and to a lesser extent, #7), which means the use of the term "irony" is quite justified. Alanis is another story, of course, but that's been discussed before. :)

    96. Re:Dear Bruce... by compatibles · · Score: 0

      seconded. one could even call it kung flu: swine style

    97. Re:Dear Bruce... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      So it will be "ironic" when it all goes to Colbert's head and he starts believes his own storyline.

      ---

      And besides that, I think there is a lot of support for the view that Colbert is ironic.

      For example, here:
      http://www.pacificviews.org/weblog/archives/001989.html
      "Why Colbert's Irony Was So Effective"

      http://www.electricstory.com/reviews/editorials.aspx?id=6
      "That's Colbert's ironic message."

      etc... on and on for pages.

      So in some sense, you are like any wordsmith hanging on the old dictionary meaning of a word while actual usage is changing.

      Is there irony in defending the meaning of irony when it is changing as you defend it?

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    98. Re:Dear Bruce... by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

      Hey! Maybe we could call it the Limbaugh Flu....

      Seems like a perfect match until you realize that flu can be cured with drugs.

      Rush? Not so much . . .

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    99. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How bout this...

      Fuck off.

    100. Re:Dear Bruce... by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      idle

      Not sure what you mean by "we all"

    101. Re:Dear Bruce... by k1773re7f · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was just commenting on this fact to my office mate today. BTW GP. I too disagree with most Republican politicians now days. And I am by registration, a Republican. Now, isn't that ironic?

      --
      This sig. intentionally left blank.
    102. Re:Dear Bruce... by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      I would hate to see an America where there was only one party.

      Uh...I've got some bad news for you.

      It's at your house. 10 'til 'late.

      Beverages are expected, only 2 have RSVP'd, but up to 280,000,000 may show up.

    103. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irony isn't what most Americans think it is. Do try to learn English.

      You are wrong. In modern usage, (situational) irony refers to a discrepancy between any expected result (or behavior) and the actual result, especially when the actual result is humorous, oddly appropriate, or unlucky.

      For instance, rain on your wedding day - ironic. A free ride, when you've already paid - also ironic. Arguing pedantically that ironic situations are in fact not ironic, when this definition of irony has long been already accepted and incorporated by lexicographers and the vast majority of the English speaking world - definitely ironic.

    104. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we need to carefully consider a few technical factors before naming it the Limbaugh Flu.

      1. Does it resist oxycontin well?
      2. Does it disproportionately attack the poor and racial minorities?
      3. Does it cause indigestion?

    105. Re:Dear Bruce... by elcorvax · · Score: 1

      And the 1918 pandemic flu was called the Spanish Flu, so I think it's fair to call this one the Mexican Flu. Just for the record, I'm Mexican.

    106. Re:Dear Bruce... by chromas · · Score: 1

      Don't feed them Red Bull.

    107. Re:Dear Bruce... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      flying pigs flu

    108. Re:Dear Bruce... by Bruce+Penises · · Score: 0

      for example among middle-eastern cultures who feel that swine are unclean

      Does anyone else find it odd that mudslums find swine unclean?

    109. Re:Dear Bruce... by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Actually "Mexican Influenza" would work. Mexican doesn't just refer to people who live in, or are from, Mexico, but also of things that originate in that country. For example; "Last night I ate Mexican food."

      I can see more (uninformed) people being offended by that, though, than the term "Swine Flu". Yes, I parenthetically added "uninformed" since this is how I view anyone who backs down from a VERY old naming convention because of the risk that someone might be offended.

      Checking Wikipedia real fast has told me something interesting, apparently the WHO does things like this. They renamed the human flavor of the the Hanta virus from Korean Hemorrhagic Fever to HFRS, as too, presumably, not offend Koreans, or more probably, not to hurt their tourism trade. Too bad the the Ebola river valley doesn't have a tourism trade, or we could expect renaming on that. Same with Marburg.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    110. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Only if you agree with his politics.

      ... which would be... ?

      Seriously -- just because he was harsh on Bush does not automatically mean he is for something specific. Comedians are capable of being generally PITA for politicians, even if not exactly in equal amounts.

    111. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not call it Kung Flu...after all, it does kick your ass pretty well.

      How about the Klung Flu?

    112. Re:Dear Bruce... by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      Except Mexican does not mean Mexican PEOPLE. It means "from mexico". If you call someone a Mexican, you are calling them a person from mexico. Same as a car can be a mexican car -- a car made in mexico.

      This is the mexican flu, it's the flu from mexico. There's nothing remotely racist about that.

      Racist would be calling it that lazy damned flu that snuck across the Rio late one night just so it could cut my grass and not learn english. That's getting a little racist. ..but last I checked there's absolutely nothing wrong with referring to something by its location of origin, whether it is a good thing or a bad thing.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    113. Re:Dear Bruce... by FrankDrebin · · Score: 1

      Aperently, you think it's cute to make fun of someone's name. MOD PERENT UP!

      --
      Anybody want a peanut?
    114. Re:Dear Bruce... by KeithJM · · Score: 1

      It would be ironic to be American and ask a Scotsman to repeat himself in English.

      I don't think so. I grant you it would be ignorant (or perhaps sarcastic, depending on intent), but it doesn't make it to ironic. A good test of this -- If an Englishman asked a Scotsman to repeat himself in English, would that be ironic? It would be closer to ironic if the American (or Scotsman) asked an Englishman to repeat himself in English (though there are so many English accents that even some Englishman have trouble understanding some of them).

    115. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he's a pig what does that make Michael Moore?

      Swine Rex?

      Fartnog Buttstinkle

    116. Re:Dear Bruce... by orasio · · Score: 1

      Wrong order.
      SwineEtAl Flu

    117. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or how about media flu?
      they are sickening and annoying....
      flu is short for 'influenza de estrellas'
      the influence of these alleged stars
      is indeed able to produce symptoms such as:
      mass hysteria
      mental fog
      fevered misinformed attitudes
      the list goes on...

    118. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God doesn't approve. IntelligentlyDesignedFlu will do.

    119. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like crotch crickets ?

    120. Re:Dear Bruce... by dalamb · · Score: 1

      Colbert fans add his name to online polls that have nothing whatsoever to do with him. It would be wonderfully ironic to get a plague named after him.

      --

      "Yo' ideas need to be thinked befo' they are say'd" - Ian Lamb, age 3.5
    121. Re:Dear Bruce... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Israel already tried that, but the Mexican officials took offense, so they changed it back.

      Yes I read that but it makes little sense to me. A lot of people in Malaysia don't like pork either which is why you have to get it from a special part of the supermarket with big NON HALAL signs on it. Muslims don't refuse to admit that it exists, they just don't buy there. You'd think that a horrible disease associated with pork would just go to show how horrible pork is.

      (yes, I know that Swine flu really has nothing to do with pork and I think the name should be changed in the name of accuracy.)

    122. Re:Dear Bruce... by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      Alanis is cosmic irony which, ironically, doesn't appear in your list of definitions.

    123. Re:Dear Bruce... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I'm curious - got a reference?

    124. Re:Dear Bruce... by thefringthing · · Score: 1

      That will reinforce the fundamentalist/extremist tendency to declare anything that causes loss of life "God's divine retribution, come to cleanse the world of heathens", or whatever.

    125. Re:Dear Bruce... by Macrat · · Score: 1

      http://www.sfgate.com/

      http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/

    126. Re:Dear Bruce... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not sure about #1....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    127. Re:Dear Bruce... by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, I know that the personality of that annoying foreigner lady on MAD TV is supposed to be annoying.. I get the joke, but in the end, I just find her annoying. The fact that the grand parent doesn't share your sense of humor does not necessarily mean he fails to "get it."

      Yes, it does. That's how politics work these days. Aw, never mind - you obviously don't get it either.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    128. Re:Dear Bruce... by smithmc · · Score: 1

      > Call it the Colbert flu? I don't think so. Colbert was just being funny...

      So are we.

      > Anyway, Colbert is generally a positive influence.

      Only if you agree with his politics.

      And what would those be? From what I can tell, he's an equal opportunity skewer-er.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    129. Re:Dear Bruce... by smithmc · · Score: 1

      I would hate to see an America where there was only one party.

      Uh...I've got some bad news for you.

      You mean good news, don't you? It's so much easier when the poor little sheeple don't have worry their widdwe heads with political choices...

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    130. Re:Dear Bruce... by emarks · · Score: 1

      Hey! Maybe we could call it the Limbaugh Flu....

      Limbaugh Flu. Swine Flu. I fail to see the distinction.

    131. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even worse, it's in your mouth. I'm coming.

    132. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1/2 man, 1/2 pig, 1/2 bird --- man-bird-pig flu is what we should be calling it.

    133. Re:Dear Bruce... by xfurious · · Score: 1

      He meant a reference, not a vague collection of articles that may or may not employ what your talking about.

    134. Re:Dear Bruce... by xfurious · · Score: 1

      Wow. "Spread through the the human population as it never has before"? Really?? Reckless abandon? With 141 cases and just 1 death (http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/)? The Black Death layed to waste at *least* 100 million people (check it, wikipedia). I think we should reserve the 'holy fuck bring out your dead' until we get a MINIMUM of 100 deaths in a reasonable amount of time.

    135. Re:Dear Bruce... by lpq · · Score: 1

      Missing, irony? Are you?

    136. Re:Dear Bruce... by ildon · · Score: 1

      No, it's just proof that people like to think that other people think the same way they do (despite evidence to the contrary).

    137. Re:Dear Bruce... by Megane · · Score: 1

      "Xenu Flu" actually has a nice sound to it.

      Then again, so does "GNU/Flu".

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    138. Re:Dear Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ye gods.

      And what percentage of people who identify as liberal/Democrat believe that "Limbaugh was making serious points, delivered in a humorous manner"?

    139. Re:Dear Bruce... by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      I suppose... but we don't call Polio "shit sickness" or HIV "ape sex virus". I guess swine is sort of like a swear word in many places.
      How about suinine flu? It rings better with avian flu, and might be sufficiently euphemistic for muslim/jewish sensibilities.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    140. Re:Dear Bruce... by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the real world.

    141. Re:Dear Bruce... by nacturation · · Score: 1

      How does that work? Do you just watch his show to get annoyed? I could see how one could find a TV host offensive, dumb, sleazy (picturing Rush to come up with these), but to get consistently annoyed by someone who you'd only watch by your own free choice is rare.

      What's even stranger is that to find something annoying, you seem to think that you have to repeatedly subject yourself to it. Here's a scenario: let's say you got stung by killer bees once. You're perfectly correct to say that you find killer bees annoying. Anyone who claims to be baffled by why you consistently get yourself stung by your own free choice would be an idiot.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    142. Re:Dear Bruce... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That sentence is approximately 56% less tortured than the shit I've been seeing in the NYT lately, god forbid I should look at the SF Chronicle. It's clear that all of their editors are suffering from some sort of brain hemorrhage lately.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    143. Re:Dear Bruce... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Is there irony in defending the meaning of irony when it is changing as you defend it?

      Irony is trying too hard to be ironic, and ending up believing your own bullshit.

      Irony is trying too hard to be ironic, and failing.

      Irony is when you misuse the word Irony.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    144. Re:Dear Bruce... by Dretep · · Score: 1

      Interesting... He should get in touch with Charmin and get his name and persona on their toilet paper. I'd love to see my crap smeared all over his face and name.

    145. Re:Dear Bruce... by angster · · Score: 1

      Don't be greedy. You already have the Thompson Machine Gun, complete with cinematic-level death toll.

  2. Who is Colbert? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who is Colbert? // not American // Swine Flu is worldwide.

    1. Re:Who is Colbert? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dilberts cousin?

    2. Re:Who is Colbert? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      So we need something everyone will relate to across the globe.

      Spam Flu?
      Sex Flu?
      Starbucks Flu?

    3. Re:Who is Colbert? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stephen Colbert is a television personality with mildly left-leaning political views (by US standards; folks in Europe would consider him mildly conservative) who parodies right-wing television and radio commentators like Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh.

    4. Re:Who is Colbert? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So name it after your country, most votes wins! (I assume India flu or Chinese flu are going to win right?)

      *Colbert voice* I dare you, I challenge you to beat me

    5. Re:Who is Colbert? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Burma Shave

    6. Re:Who is Colbert? by SwabTheDeck · · Score: 1

      Who is Colbert? // not American // Swine Flu is worldwide.

      This notation is confusing. It appears that you have a comment inside a comment inside a comment.

    7. Re:Who is Colbert? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's the President in Monsters vs Aliens.

      Unless you're in a country where they used different voices, in which case he isn't.

    8. Re:Who is Colbert? by booch · · Score: 1

      Haiku Fail.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
  3. Other news: an outbreak of political correctness by levell · · Score: 2, Funny

    Given the pandemic of meaning obscuring, "politically correct" names, I'm surprised that swine flu hasn't been renamed to "porcine repressing influenza" or some such.

    --
    Struggling to find a day everyone can make? WhenShallWe.com
  4. I've got it! by Kid+Zero · · Score: 1

    What can we do to make the name stick?

    Duct Tape it to Colbert. That'll work.

  5. +1 Vote for Mexican Flu by alta · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Lets make it obvious where this came from, to give people a good idea not to go there!

    It was good enough for the spanish flu, why must we be so damn politically correct.

    Oh, and why the hell haven't we closed our borders? Horse out of the barn? That's insane! Even if that was a valid reason, we should still keep the borders closed to keep them from overloading our hospitals!

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    1. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by downix · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unfortunately for us, the origin of the flu is turning out to be from the United States, not Mexico. So, the USA Flu then you are suggesting?

      --
      Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    2. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by Diss+Champ · · Score: 1, Insightful

      We've never managed to close the Mexican border to illegal entry - closing it to legal entry would be a pointless inconvenience to those who can currently legally cross it.

    3. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by alta · · Score: 1

      From what I've read, there's much less evidence pointing to the US than mexico. But if that turns out the be case, then yes, the American Flu.

      Maybe it just exploded in mexcico because the living conditions there are so poor.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    4. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by penguin_dance · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't worry...it will end up being all our fault even if it DID start in Mexico....

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    5. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      This strain of flu has broken out in the U.S. before- There was an outbreak in Wisonsin and also an outbreak in Fort Dix. Sometime in the '70's and 80's.

      So if you're implying that Mexico specifically has something to do with this, please stop.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    6. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by GaratNW · · Score: 1

      Well, obvious anti-immigration bias in your post aside,let's look at this on the facts:
      - There are already numerous cases in the US, and knowing about it and being aware of the issues (such as seeking medical attention if you start to feel sick) is the important thing; Closing the border only stops the legitimate people trying to cross the border. How exactly does that help stem the flow of illegal immigrants? Oh, right, we just kill them all. (Citation: http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/ - And no, no reference to killing immigrants there)
      - The financial damage of closing the border; Based on 2006 financial figures, closing of the border would cost approximately $931 million in lost trade revenue EVERY SINGLE DAY the border stays closed; Now, that's a mix of revenue between the US and Mexico, but that's the total amount. But still about $380 million in lost exports to Mexico alone. (Citation: http://www.usembassy-mexico.gov/eng/eataglance_trade.html)

      So, in addition to not doing any good, it makes our current wonderful economic state even BETTER by destroying almost a billion dollars in revenue a day. What exactly do you hope to accomplish by closing the border?

    7. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by ElectricRook · · Score: 1

      Don't worry...it will end up being all our fault even if it DID start in Mexico....

      Silly Penguin, don't you know? It's all George Bush's fault!

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    8. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by hob42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, it hasn't.

      There was an outbreak of an influenza that was named swine flu at Fort Dix in the past. It didn't spread (although I've read it lead to a vaccine campaign that was linked to Guillain-Barre symdrome).

      This form of influenza is not the same as the swine flu that happened then, just like this year's other predominant "human" influenza strains are not the same as the ones last year, or the year before. (Sometimes they do last for more than one year, but it is not a common occurance.)

    9. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately for your parents (and God forbid, children) you never acquired the ability to reason, think logically, and subsequently adhere to the scientific method.

      If something ORIGINATES IN MEXICO, how the flying european douche fuck, can you have the audacity to state (with a goddamn +3 informative?????)that it comes from the US?

      It's foreign sentiments like these that makes me feel terribly bad that a single US citizen lost his life to SAVE YOUR ASS from communism and fascism TWICE.

    10. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "We've never managed to close the Mexican border to illegal entry - closing it to legal entry would be a pointless inconvenience to those who can currently legally cross it."

      Shouldn't this be a final excuse to close it to ILLEGAL entry at the very least?!?! At least with legal entry, you can document who and when...to help track things and at the very least give someone a visual 'once over'.

      Can't do that with the illegal ones....so why not NOW shut the borders off to them?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    11. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Ok, call it the Bush flu.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    12. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Actually, WHO and most other nations ARE calling it the Mexican flu. And it makes sense since all evidence says Mexico is ground zero.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    13. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And after you spend billions and billions of dollars shutting down all the illegal entry into the US, does that stop the flu?

      The answer is (of course) no. And that means that there is probably a much better way to spend those billions of dollars to prevent a pandemic.

    14. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Then the obvious choice would be to name it the "Freedom Flu".

    15. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      " And after you spend billions and billions of dollars shutting down all the illegal entry into the US, does that stop the flu?

      The answer is (of course) no. And that means that there is probably a much better way to spend those billions of dollars to prevent a pandemic. "

      Well, it would certainly help to stop one very well known vector for the spread of that disease (and others I suppose.)

      Not only that, it would stop other problems we have in the US due to illegals, and it would of course, force the current laws in place to be enforced.

      The border needs to be secured, that is one thing the Feds are mandated with, yet they ignore it. Securing the borders would solve many problems, I was putting forth that doing so would ALSO cut off a well known vector for the spread of a particular disease.

      I don't mind legal visits and immigration.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    16. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by russotto · · Score: 1

      > CLOSE BORDER
      With what, the Berlin Wall?
      > YES
      That's no longer available.

    17. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "> CLOSE BORDER

      With what, the Berlin Wall?

      > YES

      That's no longer available."

      Why? They aren't using it anymore are they??

      :)

      Berlin wall was bad because it was used to keep people IN a repressive regime. Trying to use a wall to protect your borders from illegal intrusions, not bad...actually a tool the feds should be using to do one of the few actual mandated things they are supposed to do....Protect our borders.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    18. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by moderatorrater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the origin of the flu is turning out to be from the United States

      [citation needed]

    19. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > one very well known vector for the spread of that disease

      Well known to whom? You have absolutely no evidence that illegal immigration is a transmission vector for this virus.

      And it's not even very good speculation - most of the cases are a fair distance from the border. I'll venture that an airline passenger (who is probably a legal immigrant or visitor) is a better carrier than someone traveling by foot or car, just by the number of people they'll come into contact with before they exhibit symptoms.

    20. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by moderatorrater · · Score: 2, Informative

      What about those who entered legally and are US citizens?

    21. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the Spanish flue didn't really start in Spain. but since they weren't involved in WWI they weren't censoring mention of it out of their newspapers and it became known in spain first.

  6. Reddit had it right by MBCook · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Bacon Lung"

    Much better name.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Reddit had it right by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      +1 vote for Bacon Lung. That's awesome.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    2. Re:Reddit had it right by JimXugle · · Score: 1

      +1 More for Bacon Lung.

      --
      -jX

      Don't you just love politics? It's like a comedy of errors.
    3. Re:Reddit had it right by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      +1 more for Bacon Lung.

    4. Re:Reddit had it right by relguj9 · · Score: 1

      Winner.

    5. Re:Reddit had it right by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hell no. Not because "Bacon Lung" is a bad name, but because Reddit sucks and can't be allowed to win anything.

  7. Let's not by decipher_saint · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's call it "H1N1" flu. You know, like, what it is actually called BY SCIENCE!

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:Let's not by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, science doesn't take too kindly to being anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Let's not by nausea_malvarma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let's call it swine flu. You know, like what everyone else calls it and knows it by! I fear if all the sudden the media starts calling this H1N1, everybody will get confused, perhaps thinking h1n1 is distinct from swine flu. Calling something by it's scientific name isn't always the best choice for non-scientists. Take animals for instance - few use an animal's scientific name outside of scientific discussions.

    3. Re:Let's not by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Oh you mean the same SCIENCE that almost named a space station module "Serenity" after a tampon.

    4. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To call it "H1N1" is a vast simplification. The Spanish flu was also of the "H1N1" strain, but these two viruses carry different genetic information, which gives them different transmissability, for instance.

    5. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      raivo pommer-www.google.ee-raimo1@hot.ee

      Money-Fine

      Jean-Claude Trichet. "Nous n'excluons pas d'abaisser encore les taux", mais de faÃon "trÃs mesurée", a-t-il dit, signalant qu'il avait employé "le mÃme qualificatif" concernant la précédente réduction. "J'insiste sur le fait que nous pensons que, dans notre cas, en tenant compte de tous les éléments, une politique monétaire à taux zéro ne serait pas appropriée", a souligné M. Trichet.

      La Banque centrale européenne avait de nouveau abaissé de 0,25 point au début du mois son principal taux directeur, le faisant descendre à son plancher historique (1,25 %), un niveau qui reste cependant trÃs supérieur à celui du principal taux directeur de la Banque du Japon (0,1 %).
      Le président de la banque centrale a cependant de nouveau laissé entendre que des mesures "non-conventionnelles" pourraient Ãtre mises en oeuvre prochainement pour aider les agents économiques à reprendre confiance, un facteur-clef de la reprise, selon lui. "Je ne donnerai aucune indication sur ce que nous ferons le 7 mai (lors de la prochaine réunion du Conseil des gouverneurs), je vous fixerai un rendez-vous quand nous aurons décidé et j'expliquerai alors en détail ces décisions."

    6. Re:Let's not by wjousts · · Score: 1

      Doesn't exactly trip off the tongue does it? The name "swine flu" is out there now and any attempt to change it will be futile.

    7. Re:Let's not by Penguinoflight · · Score: 4, Informative

      I assumed it was after "Serenity" from the Firefly series.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    8. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no, we need something more approachable than H1N1 or Swine Flu. May I suggest Fluffy Pink Bunny Flu?

    9. Re:Let's not by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Well, that's a little confusing, it's just naming the two proteins.
      The Spanish Flu(originated in the far east, btw) is also aH1N1 variety. That doesn't mean it will be the as contagious or deadly as the Spanish Flu.

      Call it swine flu, educate people on why. Don't try to dodge peoples ignorance and stupidity. It is a losing game that leads to more ignorance and stupidity.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:Let's not by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't get why anyone would object to "swine flu".

      Let me see if I understand the logic here: You think pigs are unclean, and therefore you object to naming a deadly virus that thrives in unclean environments after them. Wha?

      I could understand objecting to it if it were called "Puppy and Kitty Cat Flu", or if we were trying to name a new translation of the Koran the "Swine Koran", but this is just ridiculous.

    11. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking at the other options, serenity probably was some boring run of the mill pseudo-epic-inspiring-political-correct ... thing.

    12. Re:Let's not by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Until someone give it a cute nickname from the initials. I'm sure someone will object to "hinny flu".

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    13. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not so much "pigs are gross" as "you are guaranteed to go to hell if you touch pigs the wrong way."

    14. Re:Let's not by vthokiestm · · Score: 0, Redundant

      How can science not take kindly to being anthropomorphized without anthropomorphizing it?

    15. Re:Let's not by eln · · Score: 1

      It's not so much "pigs are gross" as "you are guaranteed to go to hell if you touch pigs the wrong way."

      So if a fat chick is hitting on me at a bar, I can just tell her I'm Muslim? I'm gonna have to try that.

    16. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not like scientists. What did scients ever do to them?

    17. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't get why anyone would object to "swine flu".

      (1) There are some people whose living depends on selling swine-related products.

      (2) People are, in general, dumb.

      Consequently, people may jump to the conclusion that eating swine may result in them getting the flu.

      This is why I'm backing "Mexican flu." If nothing else, it'll cut down on people eating Mexicans.

    18. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the reason is that the name 'Swine Flu' has caused people to believe that they can get infected by eating pork (even properly prepared).

    19. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WOOOOSH() <----- Joke

      .O
      -|-  <---You
      /\

    20. Re:Let's not by ndansmith · · Score: 1

      On the cultural sensitivity angle, I believe it is because Jews or Muslims would be unlikely to seek treatment if they suspected they were infected by a disease caused by contact with unclean animals (which is of course an incorrect assumption, but that is the problem with the name). It would be like a nun seeking treatment for an STD.

    21. Re:Let's not by dontmakemethink · · Score: 4, Insightful

      H1N1 is believed to have been initially spread from a rather unkempt pig farm in Mexico, hence the swine flu. However, it isn't the fault of the pigs that the place was so nasty, it was the farmers.

      So a more appropriate name would be the Dirty Mexican Flu. However that would unduly prejudice all Mexicans, just like "swine flu" unduly prejudices pigs and the pork industry.

      I got an idea, how's about we ask someone about to die from it what it should be called? Maybe they might give us some perspective about whether the name is worth arguing about.

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    22. Re:Let's not by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Ballistics is a science. It's largely concerned with the trajectories of flying objects.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:Let's not by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      On the cultural sensitivity angle, I believe it is because Jews or Muslims would be unlikely to seek treatment if they suspected they were infected by a disease caused by contact with unclean animals

      If anyone were really so idiotic, let's just be glad they're removing themselves from the gene pool.

      But I believe it's more because pork producers are afraind of their products being banned -- as they are already in some countries in fact, even though pork isn't a vector.

    24. Re:Let's not by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      It's been referred to secondarily as H1N1 by most major news sources I've seen in the past few days. If someone does manage to get confused, they're an idiot. Too bad for them.

      Besides, what do you fear they will do? "Oh, H1N1, that's not swine flu; I can go back to licking door knobs, hooray!"

    25. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the kiddies would argue if they pronounce it "heenee" or "high-nigh" flu. Let's just hope they don't settle on "high-nee."

    26. Re:Let's not by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      It's because some religious people are crazy. We call them blackhats.

    27. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh, so some infidel brings this disease to my country and infects me and now you want to call ME the swine??!?

      That's it!

      By Alah I am so going to track you down and lick you!

    28. Re:Let's not by chocomilko · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Suppose you grew up in a culture that felt pigs were horrible, filthy, unclean animals; unfit for consumption. Now, suppose your daughter contracted an illness called "swine flu". Next, picture your daughter being shunned by the community for having contracted such a horrible, filthy, unclean disease. That's why.

    29. Re:Let's not by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

      Those in the pork industry object to it, because it hurts their business, even though you can't get the virus by eating pork. If it was called the Coca-Cola Flu, I know some business people would be upset.

      Religious groups have done what religious groups always do and continue to spread misinformation about the relationship between swine and swine flu. I imagine it feels quite validating to see your metaphorical evil get elevated to an actual evil, even in name only.

    30. Re:Let's not by ElectricRook · · Score: 1

      I wonder about that... I see that Egypt is slaughtering all it's swine as a precaution.

      Do the Egyptians raise swine for domestic consumption, or is it for export to Europe?

      I thought touching swine was a crime in a Muslim country, and eating it... could cost your head.

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    31. Re:Let's not by Moebius+Loop · · Score: 1

      I got an idea, how's about we ask someone about to die from it what it should be called? Maybe they might give us some perspective about whether the name is worth arguing about.

      Agreed. Then we can ask the friends and relatives of the 30,000 people who died from the "regular" flu last year.

      http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/04/28/regular.flu/?iref=mpstoryview

      This is a serious outbreak, but the reporting is needlessly sensational. I don't think it's unreasonable for people to make light of something that is being blown completely out of proportion.

      --
      have you been seen on slash?
    32. Re:Let's not by ElectricRook · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How could a virus come from a pig-sty? Even if in poor condition. Bacteria live for a long time in feces, virus don't.

      A virus needs a live body to live body transfer, or at least a short term in a moist cool dark place.

      Now I could see a transfer happening at slaughter. To kill, gut, and dismember an animal is a very intimate thing, you get covered in goo, there are aerosols of blood and other fluids. Yes, it's messy, and you're playing with sharp knives, cutting through bone and cartilage, leaving sharp edges to scrape yourself on... After all the hard work is done, you scrub and scrub, and you can't get the smell of blood off your body. It's much easier to call out a pro... But it's important to do it once or twice, you quickly learn a whole lot about anatomy.

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    33. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of the pigs!

      That's why. It's the same reason US citizens have been duped into dumbing down the word "TERRORIST" all the way down to "HOSTILE INSURGENT." You see, you can't sympathize with a TERRORIST like you can with a HOSTILE INSURGENT. The word TERRORIST automatically brings with it negative connotations, and we CERTAINLY can't have that can we? Especially when referring to these smug bastards that think they are going right to heaven and a long line of hairy arabian virgins.

    34. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me see if I understand the logic here:

      Why bring logic to a religion fight?

    35. Re:Let's not by D-Cypell · · Score: 1

      It's not so much "pigs are gross" as "you are guaranteed to go to hell if you touch pigs the wrong way."

      Even I believe you are going to hell if you "Touch a pig the wrong way".... and I am an atheist!

    36. Re:Let's not by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is just political correctness run amok. What are the consequences of calling it swine flu?

      A) Stupid people stop eating pork. -- Good! Prices will fall, and I like cheap pork.

      B) Stupid people feel there's a stigma attached to swine. They may not seek treatment. -- Darwin at work.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    37. Re:Let's not by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      You mean the "SCIENCE" of bureaucracy, I assume.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    38. Re:Let's not by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > H1N1 is believed to have been initially spread from a rather unkempt pig farm in
      > Mexico...

      There is no evidence whatsoever for that, and considerable evidence against it.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    39. Re:Let's not by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > A) Stupid people stop eating pork. -- Good! Prices will fall, and I like cheap pork.

      Some people make their livings producing pork.

      > B) Stupid people feel there's a stigma attached to swine. They may not seek treatment.

      Right. Instead they will ride the subway and sneeze on you.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    40. Re:Let's not by Hatta · · Score: 1

      So? Why should we care? If they don't like it, get a better culture.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    41. Re:Let's not by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Onwers of the result of breeding a stallion to a jennet will object.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    42. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because people are falsely associating the flu with pigs? Say, Egypt? This flu is spread by people, pigs are in no way a vector and should not be demonized.

    43. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I object to "swine flu" because I don't want a bunch of idiots rounding up all the pigs, slaughtering them, and dumping their bodies into thousands of mass graves all over the world - like what happened in China because some irresponsible morons persisted in calling a flu strain "bird flu" and "avian flu". With the ability to overcome reason and fool people into thinking they understand something just because they have an entrenched label for it in their heads, linguistics are far, far more powerful than you think.

    44. Re:Let's not by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      I thought touching swine was a crime in a Muslim country, and eating it... could cost your head.

      Islam is no more homogeneous than Christendom. Egypt has a large non-Muslim population, and in general, at least until fairly recently, it's pretty much been a "Muslim country" in the same sense that the US is a "Christian country." IOW, you could raise and eat pigs in peace. The fundamentalist wackos are gaining power, however, and the flu gave them a handy excuse to exercise it with the pig slaughter.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    45. Re:Let's not by JohnStat · · Score: 1

      ... or if we were trying to name a new translation of the Koran the "Swine Koran", but this is just ridiculous.

      Yes, Muslim culture is the only one in the middle east that has something against swine: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8021301.stm

    46. Re:Let's not by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I thought touching swine was a crime in a Muslim country, and eating it... could cost your head.

      Where on earth did you get those ideas from? Redneck news radio?

    47. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is, we've got two kinds of H1N1 circulating right now. The normal human kind that you've probably been vaccinated against, and the American/Eurasian swine/avian re-assortant that is causing the current outbreak.

      Both H1N1. Very different.

      If one strain dies out, we'll go back to calling the remaining one just H1N1. In the mean time, it should be 'swine flu', or 'Mexican flu', or '2009 outbreak flu' or whatever, but it needs to be differentiated of you will seriously confuse people.

      And yea, I'm in the middle of this, so Anon for now.

    48. Re:Let's not by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't get why anyone would object to "swine flu".

      International bodies of doctors and biologists do seem oddly concerned about names rather than disease prevention. Example: Drosophila biologists often give quirky names to the genes they discover that in some way reflect the phenotype of the mutant. One famous gene is Hedgehog, because mutants have spines all over them. Mammalian homologues were found, and someone named one version Sonic Hedgehog after the Sega character. Another one got named Indian Hedgehog.

      Apparently these genes are mutated in a few human diseases. The Human Genome Organization (HUGO) recently decided the name had to be changed, because it sounds unprofessional. You know, because if you're told you have a rare inherited disease, what you're going to be concerned about primarily is the specific gene name and how professional it is. I would think if you or your child is sick and you go see a doctor, you're not going to care what it's called. I'd also think that HUGO has better things to do with their time than argue about names.

      Heck, if anything, I think the humorous situations that this could lead to would lessen the blow.

      Doctor: I'm sorry sir, you have a mutation in your indian hedgehog gene
      Patient: Impossible! Prashant is as prickly as ever!

      (I totally stole that joke and don't remember where I first heard it)

    49. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem isn't that Muslims are "objecting." The problem is that Muslim nations are using the "swine" flu as an excuse to needlessly slaughter pigs, which are primarily owned and consumed by non-Muslims. Take Egypt, for example. Slaughtering pigs won't stop the swine flu. Do you seriously think that Egypt is so dumb they don't know that? They are just using "swine" flu as an excuse to oppress minorities that they don't like. It's just, in this case, the minorities are primarily Christians.

    50. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get why anyone would object to "swine flu".

      Let me see if I understand the logic here: You think pigs are unclean, and therefore you object to naming a deadly virus that thrives in unclean environments after them. Wha?

      I think it's more of a question of ignoring the disease and seeing it as a "Western" disease. People in muslim countries might think it comes from eating pork, or living near pigs. therefore they might think they are safe from the disease

    51. Re:Let's not by masterzora · · Score: 1

      I've actually been trying to increase the fear of the swine flu and telling people that eating swine will get them the flu. I want cheaper bacon, dammit!

      --
      Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
    52. Re:Let's not by k1773re7f · · Score: 1

      Then lets call it the radical islamic fundamentalist terrorist flu! And bring are boys back home.

      --
      This sig. intentionally left blank.
    53. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or how about just serenity as in the word. the moon has a tranquility base, serenity is just another of nasa's words describing space and thus naming space objects with.

    54. Re:Let's not by Al+Al+Cool+J · · Score: 1

      Except that would be l33t for "hiney"

    55. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice strawman. Nobody I know makes that claim. Not Muslims anyway. If they touch pork, they have to wash themselves as usual before they pray.

    56. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here we go, the first needless mass casualty resulting from simply mislabeling the H1N1 A virus "swine flu": 30k pigs die

    57. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H1N1 flu sounds so, so. R2D2 flu sounds better.

    58. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but just to be sure, i'm now cutting down on my taco intake too.

    59. Re:Let's not by No-Cool-Nickname · · Score: 0

      H1N1 is believed to have been initially spread from a rather unkempt pig farm in Mexico, hence the swine flu. However, it isn't the fault of the pigs that the place was so nasty, it was the farmers.

      So a more appropriate name would be the Dirty Mexican Flu.

      Recently authorities have identified patient zero as a pig farmer from Tijuana, Mexico, one Marco Sanchez. Rather than slander all Mexican pig farms, we shoud call it the Dirty Sanchez Flu.

  8. Choosing name on similarity by Gorm+the+DBA · · Score: 5, Funny
    Let's see....

    Characteristics of a flu...

    • Overrated in impact
    • makes you feel sick if you come in contact with it
    • Those who pay the least attention to science will be impacted by it the worst
    • makes you feel much better once you're beyond it
    • Costs the nation billions of dollars in lost productivity
    • invades countries without any concern for borders
    • the world would be a better place without it.

    given all these, the choice is obvious...

    I hereby dub this latest flu the CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN FLU

    1. Re:Choosing name on similarity by macbeth66 · · Score: 1

      hmmm... given those symptoms, it sounds like this would be a little more appropriate name; SLASHDOT FLU

    2. Re:Choosing name on similarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OBAMA Flu?

      * Overrated in impact (Check)
      * makes you feel sick if you come in contact with it (Check)
      * Those who pay the least attention to bad science will be impacted by it the worst (Check)
      * makes you feel much better once you're beyond it (unfortunately, it's not over yet)
      * Costs the nation Trillions of dollars in lost productivity (check)
      * "stimulates" the economy without any understanding of unintended consequences (Check)
      * the world would be a better place without it. (Check)

    3. Re:Choosing name on similarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fits as well for the Radical Democrat Flu too.

    4. Re:Choosing name on similarity by inicom · · Score: 1

      I think you're on the right track, but LIMBAUGH FLU would be most appropriate!

      --
      -a.e.mossberg
    5. Re:Choosing name on similarity by DesScorp · · Score: 1

      We could call it the Gorm flu. Your joke was nauseating.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    6. Re:Choosing name on similarity by penguin_dance · · Score: 1, Funny

      Okay I'll play....

      Which is different from the Liberal Democrat flu, signs of which are,

      * Extreme nausea
      * Delirium
      * Can't move beyond it
      * Can't be stopped at the border
      * Can't afford the cure

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    7. Re:Choosing name on similarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see....

      Characteristics of a flu...

      • Overrated in impact
      • makes you feel sick if you come in contact with it
      • Those who pay the least attention to science will be impacted by it the worst
      • makes you feel much better once you're beyond it
      • Costs the nation billions of dollars in lost productivity
      • invades countries without any concern for borders
      • the world would be a better place without it.

      given all these, the choice is obvious...

      I hereby dub this latest flu the CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN FLU

      Wait... Wouldn't that be the Microsoft(TM) flu?

    8. Re:Choosing name on similarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Costs the nation billions of dollars in lost productivity"

      I thought that was a Liberal goal, the French aren't exactly the gold standard of productivity.

    9. Re:Choosing name on similarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here, I fixed it for you...

              * Overrated in impact
              * makes you feel sick if you come in contact with it
              * Mostly spread by people without the brains to learn to avoid it or fight againt it.
              * Those who pay the least attention to common sense will be impacted by it the worst
              * makes you feel much better once you're beyond it
              * Costs the nation billions of dollars in lost productivity
              * forcibly invades everyone's personal life to further its spread
              * the world would be a better place without it.

      given all these, the choice is obvious...

      I hereby dub this latest flu the FLAMING LIBERAL FLU

    10. Re:Choosing name on similarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, Conservative Republican is redundant.

    11. Re:Choosing name on similarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds more like the 'global warming' flu to me.

    12. Re:Choosing name on similarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Characteristics of a flu...

              * Underrated in impact
              * makes you feel sick if you come in contact with it
              * Those who pay the least attention to science will be impacted by it the worst
              * makes you feel much better once you're beyond it
              * Costs the nation billions of dollars in lost productivity
              * invades countries without any concern for borders
              * the world would be a better place without it.

      given all these, the choice is obvious...

      I hereby dub this latest flu the ISLAMIC HOMOSEXUALITIS

      There, fixed that for you!

    13. Re:Choosing name on similarity by KiltedKnight · · Score: 1

      Not true, since most of these so-called "conservative" Republicans are actually neo-cons, not true conservatives. They've completely abandoned the conservative principles of smaller, less intrusive government. While they want to try to (supposedly) get government out of business stuff, they're more than happy to stick it into your personal lives to the point that some people would practically tell you that if you don't sleep with a standard teddy bear, you're not American.

      --
      OCO is Loco
    14. Re:Choosing name on similarity by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      I agree that this flu strain appears to be too mild to deserve the "Colbert" moniker, and the reported symptoms are actually contraindications for true Colbert flu.

      This is what to watch for when you get Colbert flu:

      • Sudden, desirable anatomical changes. Men will become more fully elongated and easily excitable. This strikes all men, including those in poor health, so if you contract Colbert flu, contact your doctor right away to see if you're healthy enough to have sex. Women may find their breasts becoming rounder, plumper, and firmer, resembling a beauty pageant queen more and more as the satirically ultraconservative virus ravages their bodies.
      • Cognitive leaps. Often patients begin to experience a series of epiphanies in the days following an infection. As the virus invades the brain, it starts pushing around liberal neurons, rearranging synapses into more conservative configurations, and generally kicking ass and taking names on a cellular level. The political opinions of the patient will rapidly begin to improve. However if this continues too long, the patient's life will be threatened- along with all those of his fellow sufferers- as their voting behavior starts to bring their country to its knees.
      • Anticancerous lacrimation. As the Colbert flu progresses, the patient's tears acquire the ability to cure cancer.
      • Mood stability. Patients infected with the Colbert strain quickly lose the ability to feel any emotions other than one: pure, intense, raw patriotism. They will experience an inability to laugh or cry as a result, although they can still exhibit rage toward liberals.
      • Photogenicity. The most obvious symptom of course, is a monotonically increasing photogenicity. As the infection progresses, the patient appears more and more handsome and beautiful in the presence of cameras. The virus does this in order to attract uninfected victims and help spread conservatism.
    15. Re:Choosing name on similarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      swine hundt flu

  9. And this is news because? by fataugie · · Score: 0

    WTF?

    --

    WTF? Over?

    1. Re:And this is news because? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is news because it is a reference to 2 previous news postings on slashdot. You must have missed them so I will fill you in quickly:

      What goes around comes around.

    2. Re:And this is news because? by escay · · Score: 1

      What the Flu??

  10. Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by JSBiff · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not be named after 'unclean' animals after all. I only get kosher diseases, thank you very much!

    1. Re:Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      I only get halal diseases, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by memeplex · · Score: 0

      A pig flew? A lot of other things must certainly happen now.

    3. Re:Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is, if it's known as swine flu among people who believe that contact with a swine makes one unclean, those who become ill with it will be less likely to seek treatment and more likely to be ostracized for contracting it.

      No, it's not a rational issue, but then how often are people rational, especially those living in areas most likely to be hit by an uncontrolled outbreak of this.

    4. Re:Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by TheCarp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Niether of you know what you are missing.

      Sure swine may be dirty, and their flu may be bad but....

      fucking bacon. Whats wrong with you people? Seriously.... bacon comes from swine! How can you heathens deny the one true breakfast meat!

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    5. Re:Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      the one true breakfast meat!

      Sssh! My wife thinks that's cock.

    6. Re:Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      Sadly, you aren't just killing the irrational, but those who are under their control and who may be entirely rational.

      Regardless of whether I agree with your sentiment, I prefer solutions which don't seem to promise a 10:1 friendly fire ratio.

    7. Re:Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      "Excuse me for stating this, but ostracizing the sick is an excellent quarantine measure."

      Well, yeah, but the problem might be that the affected people get better, but even after getting well again, are still ostracized. That their neighbors, business associates, etc. refuse to deal with them even after they have long gotten better from the sickness. It's a sad thing that peoples' religion sometimes is interpreted to assign blame, sinfulness, or sometimes 'lack of faith' on the (usually innocent) victims of sickness.

      (Some might wonder why I even bother to qualify the above with 'usually innocent' - it's because, statistically speaking, it's almost guaranteed that sometimes someone who is engaging in what any particular religion views as 'sin' will *also* coincidentally get sick, and then people use that as 'proof' that the disease is a punishment from God/Allah/{$deity_of_choice}; or, in the case of STD's, the contact with the disease is often a direct result of engaging in said taboo behavior).

    8. Re:Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by averner · · Score: 1

      Mexicans (and humans in general) aren't kosher meat either, so we also should not be naming it the Mexican flu....

      --
      Member of the 7 Digit UID Club
    9. Re:Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That'd have to be one charmin' mothafuckin' cock.

    10. Re:Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      fucking bacon

      I prefer to eat it.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    11. Re:Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by Creepy · · Score: 1

      weird thread...

      kosher means "fit or proper".
      halal means essentially permissible (haraam is forbidden)
      and bacon is forbidden by all major religions except maybe Hinduism (I don't know the Dharmasastra food rules) - Christians see here for KJV.

      So basically poster #1 wants a proper disease, poster #2 wants a permissible disease, and poster #3 wants a religiously forbidden food.

      If swine flu doesn't do it, maybe quoting the Bible will drive down the price of babyback ribs...

    12. Re:Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Niether of you know what you are missing....

      fucking bacon

      Dang, I just eat the stuff.

    13. Re:Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      > If swine flu doesn't do it, maybe quoting the Bible will drive down the price of babyback ribs...

      You know, just yesterday I was contemplating how we could fund so many things if the government was just willing to tax churches. I mean, they have a sunday show, and even daily shows every day, and nobody even so much as makes them get an entertainment license!

      However now, now I see some social good from churches... we need to encourage them, because the price of thick sliced bacon could stand to come down... keep the ribs... I want some pork tenderloin.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    14. Re:Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Leviticus is Jewish law. Most Christians feel that the new covenant established by Jesus supplants the OT dietary restrictions. In the NT in fact it says that what you put into your body doesn't make you unclean. I think it would be more accurate to say bacon is not forbidden by any major religions except for Judaism and Islam.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    15. Re:Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good, thin those breeding motherfuckers out some.

    16. Re:Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      One other thing. Judaism is observed by only about 0.2% of the worlds population, so whether or not it even qualifies as a major religion is somewhat debatable.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    17. Re:Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Definitely true:

      http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.html

      So "Nonreligious" is the 3rd largest group. Hindu come in as 4th and then it drops off from there. If Judaism is a major religion, then so is sikhism. Even Chineese traditional and Buddhism each on their own blow the jews out of the water in terms of numbers.

      Unless they start finding a few more lost tribes, I think the jews are pretty far out of the running for major world religions.

      Though I have to wonder how that pie chart looks when you break it down by denomination. There sure are a lot of catholics but... its quite an odd list that lumps catholics, baptists, seventh day adventists, and mormons onto the same list. Ditto for Suni and Shia.

      Of course, comming back to the discussion, I know plenty of jews who have seen the light and eat pork of all kinds.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    18. Re:Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      > Mexicans (and humans in general) aren't kosher meat either, so we also should not be naming it the Mexican
      > flu...

      The long pork isn't kosher? Is it halal?

      > Member of the 7 Digit UID Club

      really? SO I take it that the membership rules are not that strict, or is it the 7 and up club?
      Can a five digiter join?

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  11. Re:Colbert != comedian by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are you a conservative by any chance?

  12. wild panic flu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    it has a certain realism to it

  13. Just tell Colbert your idea... by FingerDemon · · Score: 4, Informative

    His running joke is that he will sell out in nearly any way to get his name out there. He'd probably love the idea and go on his show next week and urge viewers to write to WHO to ask for the rename.

    --

    "Contrarily the lookaside buffer might not be the panacea... "
    1. Re:Just tell Colbert your idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His running joke is that he will sell out in nearly any way to get his name out there. He'd probably love the idea and go on his show next week and urge viewers to write to WHO to ask for the rename.

      Exactly!!! He will make the WHO more famous that it's ever been. Millions of people who have never heard of it will sign on to vote for him. WHO will feign outrage, but privately they'll love him for it.

    2. Re:Just tell Colbert your idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the pseudo-intellectuals who watch his crap and feel "smart" because they "get it" just eat that shit up, forgetting that "making fun of sell-outs" is really not that insightful or original.

    3. Re:Just tell Colbert your idea... by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 1

      Damn, you're right, I forgot to carefully calculate my sense of humor to be highbrow enough to impress my friends but still lowbrow enough for street cred. Here I was just enjoying the comedy :(

    4. Re:Just tell Colbert your idea... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1
      NOT, I watch Colbert every day. The point to his faux arrogance is to be honored with more accolades and acknowledgments. There's nothing honorable about being named after a flu.

      As for the AC sibling knocking Colbert, most conservatives can't even figure out that he's joking!

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  14. Why don't we... by cwiegmann24 · · Score: 1

    Have a worldwide online poll to name it, and allow write-in submissions...

    1. Re:Why don't we... by tim_darklighter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have a worldwide online poll to name it, and allow write-in submissions...

      I think I might actually write in "Xenu flu" for that. It even rhymes!

  15. Flu by russell.sawyer · · Score: 1

    To make it stick, you need an on-line naming contest or maybe put "Colbert Flu" on a wrist band and send it to Colbert.

  16. Rejected names by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

    Wilbur's flu Flu Z Montezuma's revenge Tequila flu Panic flu Non-Kosher/Non-Halal flu One flu over the cuckoo's nest

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    1. Re:Rejected names by santax · · Score: 1

      Those are so 2005, lets adapt to modern days : I-flu (to mexico).

    2. Re:Rejected names by CompMD · · Score: 1

      "One flu over the cuckoo's nest"

      This is swine flu, not avian flu, duh, get it right. :p

    3. Re:Rejected names by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      I know, but couldn't resist. It was rejected...

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    4. Re:Rejected names by FrankDrebin · · Score: 1

      Well apparently this is the king of all swine flus, so I call if flu-king swine.

      --
      Anybody want a peanut?
    5. Re:Rejected names by $0.02 · · Score: 1

      You meant "Juan flu over the cuckoo.net".

      --
      If enithin kan gow rong it whil. (Murfey)
  17. Re:Colbert != comedian by oodaloop · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm English and I just don't get him....

    Maybe you're English? Shouldn't you be a little more certain of that kind of thing?

    In any case, we Americans don't always get your humor. Does that mean it's not actually funny to you too?

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  18. Ethnic Reactions? by billlava · · Score: 1

    I understand that some cultures feel swine are unclean, however, most cultures (including my own) also feel that the flu is unclean... so what's the issue with referring to the animal believed to have been the one that passed the virus along to humans?

    1. Re:Ethnic Reactions? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      See my post regarding The Plight of the Copts.

    2. Re:Ethnic Reactions? by pwfffff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, you feel that:
      A) The issue here was caused by the name 'swine flu', and not by the fact that Egyptian officials are actively persecuting a minority.
      B) The government officials really were dumb enough to ignore all expert advice and instead chose to go with just the name.
      and C) Changing the name now will prevent other government's officials from harassing minority groups.

      No. The name may have given them a convenient excuse, but the problem in Egypt has nothing to do with the name of the disease. I'd wager that they would have done their best to slaughter the pigs even if the flu was being referred to as the Mexican flu, the Colbert flu, or whatever the hell else you want to call it.

  19. Martian Death Flu by egcagrac0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Screw accuracy and mitigating fears, "Martian Death Flu" is what this world needs.

    1. Re:Martian Death Flu by HasselhoffThePaladin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sure, and just forget about how this guy feels about that. Really insensitive, man.

    2. Re:Martian Death Flu by angster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I had this in 1988 and so did Dave Barry who named it.

  20. The Plight of the Copts by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a real problem in Egypt, which is persecuting its Coptic Christians by slaughtering their pigs. A minority in Egypt are Christian, the word "Copt" refers to their Egyptian ethnicity.

    Some of the Copts farm pork, which the majority of Egyptian Islamic citizens (and their powerful clerics) feel are unclean. The Copts feed the pigs by recycling garbage, compounding their unclean nature in the eyes of Islamics. So, the Egyptians are slaughtering the pigs in the fear that they are influenza vectors.

    We don't actually know that the pig is a vector for the virus at all. Thus, the Egyptian slaughters are unwarranted. We do know that human-to-human contact is a problem this time. The pigs are where influenza genes are often mixed, because they are susceptible to avian, human, and swine viruses. There probably was one pig-to-human transmission at the beginning of this epidemic, but there isn't evidence of continuing transmission after that.

    The Copts are persecuted like most religious minorities in religious states. You don't see many of them in government (and none in high positions) or education. They don't often get government permission to build churches, and in 2007 there were Islamic riots because the people around the Copts thought they wanted to build a church. They need government permission to perform religious services.

    The bottom line here is that the Egyptians, by slaughtering the pigs, remove the livelyhood of the Copts. They aren't promising to restore that livelyhood.

    1. Re:The Plight of the Copts by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, that situation is also a case of too late. If there were any traction for cooler heads in Egypt, they wouldn't have come out with a plan to slaughter uninfected pigs, so some wily Westerners trying to deflect attention away from pigs now isn't all that likely to matter.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:The Plight of the Copts by Morphine007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, let me get this straight:

      Egyptian majority generally persecutes Egyptian minority.

      Swine Flu hits and the Egyptian majority uses that as an excuse to further persecute that minority.

      Changing the name of the flu is going to stop one demographic - who actively searches for ways to persecute the other - from persecuting a second demographic? How?

      I mean, I understand the linkage between the poor choice of name and the current mechanism of persecution, but it seems like you're implying that changing the name would make all persecution stop... which is something I don't agree with.

      Either that, or you're hoping that you'll be able to convince the Egyptian Islamic community to slaughter Colbert... ;-)

    3. Re:The Plight of the Copts by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Interesting point, but I don't believe for a second that renaming the swine flu now is going to change all that. Anyway, if you have a headline that starts with "lets rename swine flu", you just KNOW that you're already too late.

      Basically, people will call it what they want, and once something is stuck it's hard to get it out. Maybe you can in some months time, but either then the "swine flu" is way more popular or it's mostly forgotten.

    4. Re:The Plight of the Copts by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "The Copts feed the pigs by recycling garbage, compounding their unclean nature"

      They are unclean when fed that way. D you know why trigonossis is all but gone in the US? becasue it is illegal to feed garbage to pigs anymore.
      There where 12 cases in 1997. 12. out of hundereds of millions eating pork.

      "So, the Egyptians are slaughtering the pigs in the fear that they are influenza vectors. "
      I would argue this is more correct:

      "So, the Egyptians are slaughtering the pigs as an excuse to enforce Islamic views."

      Something many religion do, but the Islamic are more archaic in there methods.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:The Plight of the Copts by maxume · · Score: 1

      Uncooked garbage. There is an episode of Dirty Jobs were lucky Mike Rowe goes to a pig farm outside of Las Vegas and feeds the pigs a wonderful assortment of casino table scraps (after sorting out some fun trash and cooking it).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:The Plight of the Copts by value_added · · Score: 1

      D you know why trigonossis is all but gone in the US? becasue it is illegal to feed garbage to pigs anymore.

      One of my pet peeves.

      Pork is not, as the pork industry advertises it, "the other white meat". If it's white, you've overcooked it, most likely due to a reliance on the official USDA guidelines to cook it to 160 degrees (an absurd temperature for such a lean meat).

      Pork should be pink. Suckling pig should be even pinker.

    7. Re:The Plight of the Copts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just a note, Egypt has a wide H5n1 outbreak now, the fear is that this virus will reassort itself with the existing birdflu outbreak in egypt via the pigs as a host.

      Not saying I agree, but that is the concern

    8. Re:The Plight of the Copts by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      Well, this is fine for pork that is kept really carefully. You may have noticed that Nieman is no longer in charge of Nieman Ranch. So, where do you buy it?

    9. Re:The Plight of the Copts by N_as_in_Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      To my knowledge, there are about 90% muslims versus 10% copts. We've all seen how "reasonable and rational" people have been during this outbreak. What happens when a whole bunch of egyptians start getting sick and even dying? One can imagine a whole lot of angry muslims blaming the copts and their swine. Perhaps the Egyptian government is less concerned about the pigs as a source of the flu than they are concerned for the safety of the copts.

    10. Re:The Plight of the Copts by Tokerat · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is you'd rather have the Egyptians kill Colbert?

      PERENSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!! *shakes fist*

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    11. Re:The Plight of the Copts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So, the Egyptians are slaughtering the pigs in the fear that they are influenza vectors. "

      Those folks recommending we start calling it "Mexican Flu" are some evil motherfuckers...

    12. Re:The Plight of the Copts by Opyros · · Score: 1

      But in that case, they should at least compensate the Copts for the pigs. (They aren't doing so.) The official excuse is that the pig farmers can just sell the meat, but good luck trying to do that when there's going to be a glut on the market.

    13. Re:The Plight of the Copts by poached · · Score: 1

      I just wanted to say "thank you" for providing that insight. I heard on NPR that Egyptians were slaughtering their swines but I just thought it out of fear and hatred for pigs in the Islamic world. Using the flu as an excuse makes sense.

      And yeah, swine flue is a misnomer. There hasn't been further reports of transmission from pigs or pigs getting sick for that matter.

    14. Re:The Plight of the Copts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a bunch of crap!!

      The Christian Copts (verses the Muslim Copts) probably have it best in Egypt. First of all they have much more religious freedom then Muslims in Egypt (I lived in Alexandria for 10 years). Butrus Ghali comes to mind when you talk about high positions.

      When you have the time pay Egypt a visit and go look at the number (and size) of new churches being built. Egypt has enough problems without idiots trying to make it worse by inflaming Christian-Muslim relations in Egypt.

    15. Re:The Plight of the Copts by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      The Christian Copts (verses the Muslim Copts) probably have it best in Egypt.

      Well, I have heard about what the Islamics do to each other there, and it doesn't sound that fun for them either. But I would not say that it's heaven for the Copts. Go search on google news for reports of the church services building that was just demolished by the government. Don't trust me, go right to the sources, there seem to be more than one of them.

      It sounds like there's real oppression.

    16. Re:The Plight of the Copts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who gives a shit.
      religeous people being persecuted is good.

    17. Re:The Plight of the Copts by kbahey · · Score: 1

      Bruce

      You are someone whom I respect, and as an Egyptian, I am disappointed by the misinformation in your post.

      Here is an article I wrote about the issue of Egypt's response to the swine flu by killing pigs. First, it is far more than Egypt or Muslims: it is Swine Flu, social networks and media spreading misinformation, there is the Israeli health minister's comment, there is Twitter and social networks, and there is xkcd too ("I ate pork, am I going to get the flu")!

      There is a real problem in Egypt, which is persecuting its Coptic Christians by slaughtering their pigs. A minority in Egypt are Christian, the word "Copt" refers to their Egyptian ethnicity.

      The problem is misinformation. When bird flu hit Egypt a few years ago, about 26 people died, and chicken and ducks were destroyed for everyone.The current government just did the same for pigs, which happens to be kept mostly by Christian Coptic families. Not exclusively though. Some Muslim families raise pigs too. And just so you know, most Copts will not eat pork in Egypt because of the unhealthy way they are raised. The common knowledge is that it is non-Egyptians who consume the most pork (e.g. Greeks, Italians, Armenians, ...etc.) While in Europe with a Coptic friend, I was surprised when he ordered pork for breakfast. He explained that he does not eat it in Egypt because of the unhealthy way it is raised, but OK with eating it in Europe due to more sanitary conditions. You will know why when you read about the Garbage village of Muqattam.

      Even the Coptic Church has chimed in supporting the cull of pigs in Egypt this time, saying that eating pork is neither forbidden nor recommended by church law, and if public health calls for killing them, then it supports it! Of course, pigs are not a vector, and that is misinformation.

      Some of the Copts farm pork, which the majority of Egyptian Islamic citizens (and their powerful clerics) feel are unclean.

      Just like Judaism, Islam has some dietary restrictions, which include pork. You can agree or disagree with that

      And which "powerful clerics"? Can you name a few? Are they in the government? Do they make government policy? You are probably confusing Iran with Egypt, no?

      Fact is, the government in Egypt is far from being religious (of any brand) neither are they ethical nor moral!

      The Copts feed the pigs by recycling garbage, compounding their unclean nature in the eyes of Islamics.

      Who are the "Islamics"? Use the proper terms please: Muslims.

      So, the Egyptians are slaughtering the pigs in the fear that they are influenza vectors.

      Exactly. This is not about prosecution, this is about misguided fear. The government are wrongly extending the bird flu measures to the swine flu.

      We don't actually know that the pig is a vector for the virus at all. Thus, the Egyptian slaughters are unwarranted. We do know that human-to-human contact is a problem this time.

      Agreed, and that is what I wrote in my post above.

      The pigs are where influenza genes are often mixed, because they are susceptible to avian, human, and swine viruses. There probably was one pig-to-human transmission at the beginning of this epidemic, but there isn't evidence of continuing transmission after that.

      Agreed again.

      The Copts are persecuted like most religious minorities in religious states.

      The Copts are no more persecuted than the Muslims. The current issues in Egypt are due to a government who is despotic and resisting an change or attempt to cha

  21. !story by Trip6 · · Score: 1

    Not a story but a goof...

    --
    I hate being bipolar; it's awesome!
  22. Prescott Pharmaceuticals by Sporkinum · · Score: 3, Funny

    You can bet that Prescott Pharmaceuticals is working on a nostrum to exploit this latest panic. Includes such side effects as trotter lip, spleen bristles, and toe hams.

    BTW.. I'm a Colbert too, you insensitive clods!

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
  23. My Submission by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny
    Space herpes. Let's try it on:

    "I can't come in to work today. I have space herpes."

    "Some guy on the subway gave me space herpes."

    "CNN Reporting today that another 35 cases of space herpes have surfaced in New York."

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:My Submission by spooje · · Score: 1

      Your boss will ask if you've been watching the Syfy network again.

      --
      Tea and kung-fu. Life is good. Rising Phoenix
    2. Re:My Submission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they are seeing "Ice Pirates" on SciFi then they are watching a movie that is 1000x better than any of their regular programming. Try to watch it on Saturday morning sometime...

  24. Re:Colbert != comedian by SputnikPanic · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm English and I just don't get him....

    When will you know for sure whether you're English?

    Seriously, you don't have to be English not to get him. This plain ol' American doesn't get him either -- and finds him irritating as hell too.

  25. Call it "Outbreak" by janwedekind · · Score: 1

    and create a WHO video clip featuring Dustin Hoffman who explains that nobody needs to be worried.

  26. Here's an idea by shma · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about we stop giving stupid suggestions their own Slashdot articles?

    --
    I came here for a good argument
    1. Re:Here's an idea by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1, Troll

      Bruce is famous for writing some sort of P2P software, which, I believe, failed due to inadequate support for now-ubiquitous NAT, and for having a borderline-worthless search capability. Because of this project, though, he is somewhat of a celebrity, so his ideas are going to get more attention than the average slashdot comment.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    2. Re:Here's an idea by RichardJenkins · · Score: 1

      That's a stupid suggestion, but I'd still like to see a Slashdot article about it.

    3. Re:Here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh... he co-founded the OSI, was a Debian project leader, and wrote BusyBox.

      Who the hell are YOU thinking of?

    4. Re:Here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? I'm not sure whether that was some sort of joke or just crap made up at random but... INSIGHTFUL?

    5. Re:Here's an idea by harl · · Score: 1

      Amen.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    6. Re:Here's an idea by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Since some ACs are telling me I'm wrong, I tried to look this up, and couldn't find what I was looking for. I could have him confused with someone else. So don't put too much stock in my comment.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  27. mild v. wild by memeplex · · Score: 0

    W.H.O. says only about 10 dead. This pig/bird/human virus is said to be fairly mild, for now. Not airborne, and generally not lethal. I think "H1N1" is fine for now. Remember that plain old human flu killed 30,000 last year in the U.S. alone. I'll commence duct taping my doors and windows... NOW.

    1. Re:mild v. wild by Americano · · Score: 1

      Not airborne, generally not lethal

      The CDC has stated that they believe this virus is being trasmitted from person to person the same way other influenza viruses spread - airborne aerosols created when infected people cough & sneeze.

      It may seem to have a relatively low mortality rate, but that doesn't have any bearing on whether or not the virus is airborne.

    2. Re:mild v. wild by memeplex · · Score: 0

      Aerosols containing H1N1 (droplets of snot and lung-butter) are airborne, such as cough and sneeze. The virus itself is not airborne.

    3. Re:mild v. wild by HasselhoffThePaladin · · Score: 1

      This pig/bird/human virus is said to be fairly mild

      There is nothing mild about Manbirdpig.

    4. Re:mild v. wild by Americano · · Score: 1

      The absurdness of this response is mind-boggling.

      Really.

    5. Re:mild v. wild by memeplex · · Score: 0

      The word is "absurdity" and no, the virus is not airborne. If you are coughed or sneezed on, or are touched by someone who has the liquid droplets of same on their skin, or touch a doorknob, etc... you can be infected. Perhaps you should find out what an airborne virus is before commenting.

    6. Re:mild v. wild by memeplex · · Score: 0

      The word is "absurdity," moron. Something transmitted by coughing and sneezing aerosols is not considered airborne any more more than I'm considered a flying mammal when I jump a few feet. You are mind-bogglingly rude and stupid.

    7. Re:mild v. wild by memeplex · · Score: 0

      Airborne: "airborne transmission - if the microorganism can remain in the air for long periods" You're as wrong as the day is long, pal.

    8. Re:mild v. wild by Americano · · Score: 1

      The word is "absurdity"

      Really? I could have sworn I meant absurdness, which is a synonym for absurdity, you pedantic twat. Next time I need to know what word I'm thinking of though, I'll be sure to ask you.

      Perhaps you should find out what an airborne virus is before commenting.

      Please, then, define what exactly the transmission method is for influenza? Is the medical term a "snot virus"? a "lung-butter virus"? When the virus is transmitted through an airborne aerosol (as influenza is), it is entirely appropriate to call that method of transmission "airborne."

      But please, feel free to point out examples of viruses which are airborne and which are not introduced into the body via a liquid or fine particulate aerosol. I'm sure with your advanced knowledge of virology and medicine, you'll have no trouble providing an example of such an airborne virus that just floats around "naked" in the air, waiting for unsuspecting prey.

    9. Re:mild v. wild by memeplex · · Score: 0

      airborne transmission - if the microorganism can remain in the air for long periods.

      droplet contact - coughing or sneezing on another person

      These ARE medical definitions, asswipe

    10. Re:mild v. wild by Americano · · Score: 1
      Hmm. That's funny. Because I could have sworn that the CDC guidelines for isolation precautions define airborne transmission thusly:

      Airborne transmission occurs by dissemination of either airborne droplet nuclei or small particles in the respirable size range containing infectious agents that remain infective over time and distance.

      Frankly, I'm inclined to believe that when the CDC says that there is "some evidence" of airborne transmission, they actually know what the term means, and are using it in accordance with their own definition.

    11. Re:mild v. wild by Americano · · Score: 1

      Really? Care to provide the name of the medical text or peer-reviewed medical journal that you pulled those from?

      Because - not that I'm calling you ignorant, you understand - it really looks to me like those are pulled verbatim from the first paragraph of the Wikipedia page on "Transmission (medicine)". Furthermore, it looks as if the first paragraph on wikipedia is all you really bothered to read to educate yourself on this topic.

      I provided a definition from the CDC of airborne transmission, so hopefully you can understand that. Droplet contact is generally held to be short distance direct transmission (generally over less than 1 meter - "I sneeze, you get wet"), or indirect transmission if the droplets land on a surface that you then come in contact with. Droplets also tend not to be of a size suitable for aerosolation, and so settle to a surface rapidly after they are expelled. Droplet contact IS a method in which influenza may spread, but it is not the ONLY method by which it may spread.

      Pro tip: When you're in a hole, best thing to do is stop digging.

    12. Re:mild v. wild by memeplex · · Score: 0

      Nice article, but totally unrelated. Google influenza. Droplet transmission. See if the CDC considers pig flu airborne. They don't. If they did, there would be headlines screaming AIRBORNE. But there aren't. You're wrong. Accept it. We all make mistakes.

  28. Not just concerned by necro81 · · Score: 1

    Or, is it because meat packers are concerned that people might stop eating pork in fear of the virus?

    Meat packers aren't just concerned about it - it is in fact actually happening. Plenty of people genuinely (and jokingly) think that eating pork products is a way to get this disease.

    Public health officials have to live in the real world, where irrational behavior, fear, hysteria, and misinformation are enemies as big as disease itself. If referring to it as "H1N1 Influenza" rather than "Swine Flu" gets people to smarten up about it, and has the benefit of reducing damage to the meat industry, then so be it.

  29. Suggestion 10041313 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arriba Flu

  30. I'm all for it by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 0, Troll

    The man, and I use the term loosely, is a pig, so it is fitting.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  31. Swine Flew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Colbert needs to stop hogging the spotlight - sure, he's got a nice cable sow and millions of adoring fans, but people are going to get boared fast if he continues to keep bacon for things to be named after him. It's snout comedy, it's egoism. Real comedy is about making clever puns and having everyone hate you for it.

    1. Re:Swine Flew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate you.

  32. Edit the wiki by spooje · · Score: 3, Funny

    How about editing the Wiki page to call it the Colbert flu. And while we're at it let's say the flu is a direct result of saving all the elephants.

    --
    Tea and kung-fu. Life is good. Rising Phoenix
    1. Re:Edit the wiki by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      I hearby submit Bear Flu or maybe Ursine Flu as the new name. Number one threat to America... BEARS!

  33. Re:Colbert != comedian by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm sorry but "Colbert" and "Comedian" only belong in the sentence if the words between them are "is not a ". Maybe I'm English and I just don't get him....

    Colbert is an example of cultural humor. The Colbert character is a parody of American right-wing demagogues.

    Unless you are familiar with those demagogues, you'll not understand the comedy.

    It's like slashdot humor. Unless you're familiar with the memes, the subject matter, and the jokes that have come before, 3/4 of the jokes just won't be funny to you.

    That's the problem with humor... little of it is universal (not even poop jokes are universal, as some cultures don't have the same hang-ups about doody that we do). Slapstick is probably the only truly universal humor.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  34. Re:Colbert != comedian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry but "Colbert" and "Comedian" only belong in the sentence if the words between them are "is not a ". Maybe I'm English and I just don't get him....

    It's likely that you don't "get him". In fact, many Americans don't get him. You have to be versed in American politics and American political media to understand the dark humor of it all.

    If you don't get it, it's likely because you aren't quite as engaged in the nonsense of American politics.

    Consider yourself lucky.

  35. Now to be called "Pandemic Influenza Germ" by presidenteloco · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or P.I.G. Flu

    - suggested by CBC radio's "The Current" program this morning.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:Now to be called "Pandemic Influenza Germ" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or P.I.G. Flu

      - suggested by CBC radio's "The Current" program this morning.

      Then the anchors will be leading their stories with "The notorious P.I.G Flu...".

  36. Spanish flu came from the US by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A book, you should read it.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  37. WHO Flu? by Improv · · Score: 1

    If we're going to do euphemisms, let's show the WHO what we think and call it the WHO Flu.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
  38. Re:Colbert != comedian by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry but "Colbert" and "Comedian" only belong in the sentence if the words between them are "is not a ". Maybe I'm English and I just don't get him....

    I think you have to suffer through large exposure of American news before Colbert's humor would make any sense.

    --
    I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
  39. Let's not by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    And just say we did.

  40. It's all about a good acronym. by ROMRIX · · Score: 1

    I submit to you, the Colbert Flu;
    Contagious Olfactory Limiting Breathable Express Retrovirus Transmission Flu

  41. Bacon is good by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 0

    "citing ethnic reactions to 'swine'"

    Hmmmm. In my culture, swine meat is considered a delicacy and tasty (think bacon!!!). Still, I never objected to someone link the animal with flu. If it is the vector so be it. If it is NOT the vector, get rid of the association faster than quick, please. I am not in the mood to have my food associated with anything bad.

    1. Re:Bacon is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is that it offends only in one direction. To make a western parallel, suppose we called some new flu "prostitute flu" because it originated with prostitutes, and you caught it, would you be fine telling your entire family that you caught the "prostitute flu"?

    2. Re:Bacon is good by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

      Yes, I would be fine telling my family I had "prostitute flu", if it was an air born flu. They might even laugh at it, asking me how I had received it. But, I don't expect they would even suggest I had had intercourse or phellatio with a pig if I would have received the "swine flu".

      They would, however, not laugh at gonorrhea, syphilis or other STDs (for explicit details, read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexually_transmitted_disease).

  42. Part Avian Flu, Part Swine Flu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flying Pig Flu!

    1. Re:Part Avian Flu, Part Swine Flu? by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      I kept telling people that's what it was, but no one would believe me...

  43. Buy a clue by geekoid · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It came from Swine.

    Also, the Spanish Flu did not originate in Spain, it originated in the far east.

    "Oh, and why the hell haven't we closed our borders? Horse out of the barn? "

    No, it would be pointless at this time. 3 weeks ago it would ahve made sense.

    "we should still keep the borders closed to keep them from overloading our hospitals!"

    ah, you're a bigot. No wonder there was no thought put into your post. It's just an excuse for your hate.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Buy a clue by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      No, it would be pointless at this time. 3 weeks ago it would ahve made sense.

      I'm not so sure about that. A better way of putting it would be "a horse sneezing out the barn". True, the germs from the prior sneezes are already out there. But that damn horse is still sneezing through an open door!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:Buy a clue by sexconker · · Score: 1

      How is it bigotry to suggest that American hospitals should be used for the Americans who pay for them?

      Especially if there is the possibility of them becoming full (there isn't, this whole swine flu bullshit is retarded, and the WHO has lost 50 DKP for whoring it out).

      Bigotry is suggesting that one group of people should be allowed to illegally enter a foreign nation to receive free medical treatment, education, etc. at the expense (monetary, lack of medical resources, increased crime, etc.) of the actual citizens of that nation.

    3. Re:Buy a clue by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia says it originated in Kansas (skip to geographic history)
       
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_flu

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    4. Re:Buy a clue by value_added · · Score: 1

      How is it bigotry to suggest that American hospitals should be used for the Americans who pay for them?

      You don't get out much, do you? I'd suggest that if you've not yet travelled outside the country and became ill or broke a leg (and then discovered how most industrialised countries distribute health care), you talk to the average Canadian or European visitor who came to the US and did the same.

      When you're done comparing notes, chances are high that you'll find yourself enlightened, embarrassed, or both.

    5. Re:Buy a clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It came from Swine.
      Unless I'm mistaken, no infected pigs have been found.

      It's just an excuse for your hate.
      I HATE that I'm paying for them to use our hospitals.
      I HATE that they're bringing disease and sickness into MY country.
      I HATE they they can get government assistance without contributing.
      I HATE that my government is pandering to THEM more than to their own citizens.
      I HATE that they come to MY country without learning MY language.
      I HATE that I have to press 1 for English.
      I HATE that nobody understands that they have no loyalty to OUR country and still they want to grant amnesty to millions of them.
      I HATE that because they're 'undocumented', local police won't touch them.
      I HATE 'no se habla'.

      I'm not the OP you tried to flame, but the hatred seems pretty well justified.

    6. Re:Buy a clue by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      "Canadian or European visitor . . ."

      Are you suggesting that the tens of millions of people from Mexico and South America who have illegally crossed into the United States are merely "visitors"?

      I also noticed that you attacked the OP personally(and with unsubstantiated allegations) as opposed to addressing the question about "How is it bigotry . . .". If you ever have the courage or intelligence to question the fundamental assumptions upon which your politically correct world-view is based on, you might find yourself enlightened.

    7. Re:Buy a clue by afabbro · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      How is it bigotry to suggest that American hospitals should be used for the Americans who pay for them?

      You don't get out much, do you? I'd suggest that if you've not yet travelled outside the country and became ill or broke a leg (and then discovered how most industrialised countries distribute health care), you talk to the average Canadian or European visitor who came to the US and did the same.

      When you're done comparing notes, chances are high that you'll find yourself enlightened, embarrassed, or both.

      If I broke my leg in Canada or Europe, then I would pay the bill and submit it for reimbursement to my American insurance company, to whom I pay premiums every month.

      'cause, ya know, I have traveled outside this country and done exactly that.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    8. Re:Buy a clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess living in the great Melting Pot that is the USA isn't all that great after all huh? Maybe you ought to move out?

      "Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me: I lift my lamp beside the golden door."

      ---As long as they speak English though, right?

    9. Re:Buy a clue by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > It came from Swine.

      Part of its genetic material came from a swine flu. Part came from a bird flu, and part came from a human flu. The first person to catch it may have gotten it from a bird, or it may have evolved right there in that person. It is quite possible that no pig has ever been infected with this virus. There is as much grounds to call it bird flu or people flu as swine flu. How about manpigbird flu?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    10. Re:Buy a clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you on the English thing. We didn't come here speaking native american languages, so we can't expect immigrants to speak English, but they shouldn't expect us to speak Spanish either.

    11. Re:Buy a clue by alta · · Score: 1

      Lets take the stupid barn analogy... If there was ONE horse in the barn, there's no point in shutting the door. BUT THERE ARE MILLIONS of horses. So we're just letting in MORE infected people to infect MORE uninfected, and do so faster.

      As for my comment about hospitals, you haven't disagreed, you just let me know I've hurt your FEEELINGS. Big damn deal. I have young kids that are currently NOT sick.

      1. I Want to keep it that way. Close the damn borders.
      2. If they do get sick, I want them to be able to get into a hospital, not die in the waiting room because of swarms of illegals that MY TAXES are paying to give treatment.

      Bigot, no. Realist, yes.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    12. Re:Buy a clue by sexconker · · Score: 1

      They're fine too, why wouldn't they be?

    13. Re:Buy a clue by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you fail.

      Legal visitors who pay for treatment are not the issue here, dude. Nor are illegal visitors who pay for treatment. Nor are legal visitors who end up not paying for treatment. Nor are illegal visitors who end up not paying for treatment.

      The issue is illegal residents who demand to be treated for free, in such numbers that paying, legal citizens/residents/visitors receive poorer care, have longer waits, or are denied care.

      The same thing holds true for the economy, the jobs market, and the criminal justice system.

      Screaming "bigot" is usually the first thing a bigot does when confronted with a view they don't agree with. The actual bigotry lies in demanding special rights and treatment for this group while blindly rejecting any calls for logic or fairness.

    14. Re:Buy a clue by omega_dk · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, we didn't have socialized health care. Seems to me that you're not paying for anything at all. Last I checked, the flu could also be contracted by Americans visiting Mexico and returning. Seems to me like it would be entering YOUR country no matter what. Last I checked, America had no official language. Seems to me like we should all be speaking Cherokee by that logic (speaking of bringing disease to another population....) Yeah, that's some well-justified hatred right there...

      --
      Just because you don't like the truth, does not make it false.
  44. Bacon Fever!!! by CRiMSON · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm telling you Bacon Fever!!!

    --
    oogly boogly!
  45. Re:Colbert != comedian by nomadic · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's like slashdot humor. Unless you're familiar with the memes, the subject matter, and the jokes that have come before, 3/4 of the jokes just won't be funny to you.

    I am familiar with the memes, the subject matter, and the jokes that have come before, and 4/4 of them still aren't funny.

  46. #colbertflu by gnownaym · · Score: 1

    Use the masses to do your bidding! Start tagging things on twitter as both #colbertflu and #swineflu (with requests to retweet, of course). It won't take long before someone thinks it's amusing enough to copy. It's better than all of the "@noonecaresaboutme OMG, I'm soooo going to miss bacon!!! #swineflu" tweets that are clogging my series of tubes...

  47. Rejected names by jbeaupre · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wilbur's flu
    Flu Z
    Montezuma's revenge
    Tequila flu
    Panic flu
    Non-Kosher/Non-Halal flu
    One flu over the cuckoo's nest

    (just flat out ignore my poorly formatted list above. Sorry)

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  48. This should be decided by an online vote. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say we let Time host the pole.

    Now if i can just figure out how to avoid catching the Moot Flu.

  49. Snuggles by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    Who is going to not call it swine flu after all the hubbub?

    But if we want to put Colbert's name on anything how about on a swine?

    BTW does anyone know if Colbert has the flu? Like they say "that truck has your name on it", I don't think he wants his name on the flu. But if he has the flu, anyone who wants to snuggle with him can call it the Colbert flu.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  50. So religions have the last word on disease naming? by muuh-gnu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > ethnic reactions to 'swine,' for example among middle-eastern cultures who feel

    Actually, they do not "feel" this at all, it has been force-hammered into their heads from early childhood, when they minds could not defend themselves, because several hundreds of years ago, their self-appointed religious founders had no refrigerators (but forgot to leave a "or any later version" in their GPLs.. err... holy scriptures).

    So basically a secular, neutral, international health organisationen now forces a disease renaming onto the whole planet because a few backwards theocracies, who happen to have stuck themselves into a religion without a feasible upgrade path (hehehehehe), threaten to let their people die en masse in order to avoid pronouncing the word "swine" loudly. (I'm writing this, but still cant grasp that they rally mean this seriously. Jeez.)

  51. Pussification for PC's sake. by geekmux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about Pussification Flu? Anyone who is offended by that name, well, they probably deserve to be.

    In other words, get a fucking grip. It's the flu. Get over it already. A pig by any other name.

    Oh, and just another small observation for those who are still offended by the "dirty" reference, any animal that still stands on four legs and eats slop with its mouth because it happens to lack opposable thumbs, logical thinking and an IQ under 50 is very well likely to be DIRTY.. For further reference on this fact, please refer to the guide of Common Sense under the No Shit, Sherlock section.

    1. Re:Pussification for PC's sake. by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      How about Pussification Flu? Anyone who is offended by that name, well, they probably deserve to be.

      In other words, get a fucking grip. It's the flu. Get over it already.

      I don't get it either. Is this really any worse than any other flu virus? The flu kills people all the time. How many people died from this flu virus so far? How many people died in car accidents today in the US alone? Smoking? Child birth?

      And what's up with the reported number of deaths? First it's a few, then it's like 150 in mexico. Then the WHO says, oh sorry, it's only 9. WTF? How hard is it to count dead people? And why when the WHO reported their new number did I get the distinct impression that they were lying?

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    2. Re:Pussification for PC's sake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because it happens to lack opposable thumbs, logical thinking and an IQ under 50

      I must assume from the above that you, sir, lack logical thinking yourself...

      May I see your thumbs, please?

    3. Re:Pussification for PC's sake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      geekmux, you had the right idea. Call it the Fucking Grippe.

    4. Re:Pussification for PC's sake. by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 1

      but pigs are actually very clean and intelligent animals when they are given adequate space. it is only when far to many are stuffed into small spaces that they turn into dirty and cruel animals.

      note: I worked on farms while paying my way through university.

      --
      -I only code in BASIC.-
  52. "CAFO flu" by KarmaRundi · · Score: 1

    Or maybe "Feedlot flu"

  53. this is why you don't have a television show by darrenkopp · · Score: 1

    because you aren't very funny at all.

  54. Colbert Nation Perens Nation by lewscroo · · Score: 1

    The 'Colbert Nation' is a bit bigger than the 'Perens Nation' so I think that you are going to be rather unsuccessful in your venture.

  55. Santorum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad Santorum is already being used...

  56. The Appropriate name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would probably be to name it after the scientist and lab that created it. Thus making it easy for someone to hunt down said scientist and company/lab and do the world a favor.

  57. Re:Colbert != comedian by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sorry but "Colbert" and "Comedian" only belong in the sentence if the words between them are "is not a ". Maybe I'm English and I just don't get him....

    That's OK, mate. We don't get the whole cross-dressing thing here.

    Cheers.

  58. PC Flu, WW Flu, WT Flu by Ken+D · · Score: 3, Funny

    PCFlu - Politically Correct Flu
    WWF - World Wide Flu
    WTF - World Terrorizing Flu

  59. Re:Colbert != comedian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, wonder why? Let's see, I suppose you're a republican and you're probably dumb. Oh, wait, I repeat myself.

    Sorry Twain.

  60. Pandemic naming system by drDugan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No person, country, or industry deserves to be saddled with the name of a deadly infectious disease that happens by random evolutionary chance.

    We have a similar problem with random tropical storms that can eventually turn deadly, and we have in place standard, non-offensive naming system. It uses an annual system with alpha-ordered names.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropical_cyclone_naming

    Given the ever-growing global population and the *inevitable* concomitant increase in pandemic diseases, we will eventually need to come up with preemptive arbitrary unoffensive names like we do for storms.

    Get the WHO or some robust international group to make a set of arbitrary, alpha-ordered, gender-unbiased names, and any time one reaches pandemic stage 4 (or some stage of early but serious global problem), assign the next name.

    Like:

    Arthur Flu
    Betty Stomach Bug
    Carl Flu
    Denise Spotty Fever
    Eric Virus
    Florence Worms

    etc ...

    1. Re:Pandemic naming system by booch · · Score: 1

      That's fine, until you get to "Muhammed" swine flu.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
  61. Very Interesting by billlava · · Score: 1

    I had not heard that angle before. That is a pretty unfortunate circumstance and I can see why they would have a vested interest in clearing the swine's good name. I thought that the issue was just among non pork-eating people who were just sick of hearing the name.

  62. Re:So religions have the last word on disease nami by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

    It's not the lack of an upgrade path, but no end-of-life date.

  63. Re:Colbert != comedian by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

    It probably means he's American.

    Many of us Americans aren't really sure of our heritage. Maybe I'm English, Scottish, Welsh, Irish, German, Austrian, Polish, Blackfoot, and God knows what else, I'm beginning to think my ancestors would mount a gorilla if it wouldn't tear their arms off.

  64. clearly the bird component is by gov_coder · · Score: 2, Funny

    a penguin. So it should really be called penguin flew. Since nobody actually eats penguins, this name should satisfy all parties.

    --
    Rob Enderle's excellent new book: Everything I needed to know about Computer Science I learned in Marketing School
  65. Re:Colbert != comedian by centuren · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry but "Colbert" and "Comedian" only belong in the sentence if the words between them are "is not a ". Maybe I'm English and I just don't get him....

    He's certainly not a classic comedian. As others have pointed out, his entire persona is done in satire, and it's blindly-patriotic, high consuming America that he's satirising.

    That's not to say his bit is funny; that's obviously left to opinion. I've come across plenty of disagreement in the USA regarding the quality of his show. All the same, it is possible that something is lost in cultural translation.

    In any case, we Americans don't always get your humor. Does that mean it's not actually funny to you too?

    I think the same goes in this direction; whatever British humour isn't widely popular here might well have mixed reviews in the UK. All the same, what's not to get about a man in women's clothing? ;)

  66. Re:Colbert != comedian by maxume · · Score: 1

    A lot of it is just wit and quips though. And for his "The Word", he usually gives the context that the on screen text is riffing off of, so it isn't that hard to connect the dots.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  67. Flying Pig Flu by AkkarAnadyr · · Score: 4, Funny

    The virus has genetic characteristics of avian flu and swine flu.

    The obvious way to distinguish this one is to call it the Flying Pig Flu.

    Late-night comics and morning zoo types will flog it for all it's worth, so it will overtake the current moniker.

    And the zealots will have to try to kill all the flying pigs.

    Sorry, Stephen.

    --

    I bought this house and you know I'm boss
    Ain't no h'aint gonna run me off

    1. Re:Flying Pig Flu by kiehlster · · Score: 1

      +1 for flying pig flu. Now we really know what happens when pigs fly.

    2. Re:Flying Pig Flu by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Of course the flying pig flu. Otherwise how would we know it was a flying pig in the first place?

    3. Re:Flying Pig Flu by HasselhoffThePaladin · · Score: 1

      But you're forgetting about the human half of the strain.

      Half Human. Half Bird. Half Pig.

      Clearly this is all because of Manbirdpig.

    4. Re:Flying Pig Flu by AkkarAnadyr · · Score: 1

      Flying Long Pig Flu?

      --

      I bought this house and you know I'm boss
      Ain't no h'aint gonna run me off

    5. Re:Flying Pig Flu by si3n4 · · Score: 1

      clearly the best idea yet

  68. Mexico Flu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    enough said :)

    1. Re:Mexico Flu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wish I had some mod points... call it what it really is, Mexican Flu.

  69. How about the Napolitano flu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suggest we name it the Napolitano flu in honor of Janet Napolitano who is ensuring that it has a safe home here in America by not closing the border to illegal aliens who are bringing it here!

  70. No it didn't by ichthus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Google, you should use it.

    --
    sig: sauer
  71. Call it the Mexican flu. by Eevee · · Score: 0

    Everyone is already used to using locations for flu strains, H1N1 is too generic, and it's not really a pure swine flu. (There's also some avian and human flu bits in it.)

    This works with the technical name, which includes the location as part of the naming. It starts with the strain, location, (unique?) identifier string, date, and the H/N type.

    Examples of existing names: Influenza A/USSR/90/77 (H1N1), A/Fujian/411/02 (H3N2),

  72. Why? He was innocent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They forced him to produce a body... that doesn't mean anything. Hans was a nerd and the jury doesn't like that so they locked him up. Simple as that.

  73. That would be confusing... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Plus, are you going to be the one who will explain to all the crying little kids in English speaking world that their mommy and daddy are just fine, that they don't have the "Perens flu" and that they are not going to die?

    Does THAT seem fair to YOU?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  74. I think it is quite simple... by thegermanpolice · · Score: 1

    We pander too much to the politically correct...

    Lets look at the last pandemics...

    Asiatic (Russian) Flu 1889
    Spanish Flu 1918
    Asian Flu 1957
    Hong Kong Flu 1968

    The precident has already been created in using the name of the first case/s to name the flu pandemic virus.

    No one should be able to object to the name Mexican Flu 2009.

  75. He'll love it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For someone who makes money by attracting attention, there is no such thing as bad publicity.

  76. Swine flu = misnomer by crmarvin42 · · Score: 1

    While I don't think that naming the flu after Colbert is even a remotely good idea, I do agree that the name is incredibly misleading.

    The "Swine flu" is names so because it contains components common to flu viruses found in pigs, but pigs and humans have always been able to pass certain strains of flu viruses back and forth. Pigs could just as easily think of this strain as the "Human flu" if they had the mental faculties to know and care. The problem isn't that the pigs have the flu, or that they are spreading it to humans, but that humans are spreading the flu to each other. Where ever the flu originated, it's spreading from human-to-human and that makes it a human flu in my mind. An unusually virulent and obviously scary flu, but still the flu

    1. By continuing to refer to the virus as the swine flu, we are scaring people away from pork despite the lack of a single case of this flu in pigs north of the US/Mexico border.
    2. Even if US pigs got this flu, it wouldn't matter because the flu is a respiratory infection and no one I know eats pig lung.
    3. And even if pig lung were a delicacy somwhere, the flu is not very stable at high temperatures so appropriate cooking times would kill it.
    4. just to entertain the truley rediculous, even if people were eating pig lung from infected pigs and not cooking it thoroughly, the mortality rate is still incredibly low in the US where, despite it's obvious problems, the health care system is far better than that available to most Mexicans.

    The WHO, CDC, and others should be doing what they can to prevent the spread of this supprisingly virulent strain of the flu. We all should be careful to prevent spreading the flu (regardless of strain). However, we shouldn't be scaring the crap out of the un/under-educated at home and throughout the world just to sell newspapers and ad space on our websites.

    Hell, the Egyptian government has decided to kill every single pig in the country to battle the spread of a flu that has only been found in pigs in one country, on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean. Now, I've heard some rumors that this is more of an attempt to take a cheap shot at one of the few religious groups in Egypt that do eat pork while they have a sudo-legitimate exucse, but still. Over-reaction without a doubt.

    --
    Bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.-Oscar Wilde
  77. Make up their own ethnically appropriate name? by keriaan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This might sound like flamebait but it is an honest question...So what if in English it's the Swine flu? "Swine" probably isn't even a word in these cultures that are reacting to the use of the word. And isn't it their problem if they have literally translated it into their language. Why don't they come up with their own name for the flu and use that? It's not as if they don't have their own words for everything else. The WHO and their own local media could then use the appropriate word for the appropriate culture when discussing the flu with people from that culture.

    1. Re:Make up their own ethnically appropriate name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of countries are calling it Mexican flu already anyway (see: the Netherlands).

      I assume France is too after all of their outrage and desire to shut the border to Mexican flights.

      It makes sense for people to call it by the name of the country most effected/appearing to be the origin, but really it matters very little as long as it's clear what is meant. If this leads to some confusion when using a cheap internet translator, I think that it is acceptable. A proper translator would catch the mistake, or someone who is reading an article on 2009 H1N1 could reasonably infer that a reference to Swine flu meant Mexican flu or 2009 H1N1. I think Mexican flu 2009 and Swine flu of 2009 both convey the idea well enough*. I personally prefer 2009 H1N1.

      * - unless there is another one in the second half of the year..which would coincide with my upcoming movie.

  78. How about everything! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's rename everything Colbert! slashcolbert.org!

    Once or twice is funny. After that it's just lame.

  79. kdawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not call it the 'kdawson flu' then?

  80. ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news today, the WHO, a //scientific// organisation dedicated to improving the health and health consciousness of people worldwide, bowed to pressure from a particular //religious// organisation that demanded that this secular organisation stop using an accurate, easily-communicated term that offends their religious sensibilities. Communication with the public about a real danger was thereby hobbled, costing someone somewhere something non-trivial in real terms. For the sake of someone's fantasy.

    Also, the FDA has banned Plan B, insulin is off the market, the WHO won't be distributing the E.-Coli-produced antiflu enzyme (E. Coli live in the human large intestine! Filth!) and stem cell research worldwide is now outlawed! Also, Measles, Polio, and smallpox, y'all.

    Stop kowtowing to the religious fanatics. It's a virus that transfers from humans to pigs to humans. If they aren't comfortable with that fact, then they can pick their own little fantasy and their own fantasy terminology and their own fantasy facts. They don't get to force everyone else on the planet to roleplay in their fantasy.

    It's. Swine. Flu.

  81. Trichinosis by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2, Interesting

    See Trichinosis fact sheet and the Wikipedia article. Yes, it's really sad that poor people feed garbage (and feces of other animals) to the animals that they are rearing to produce meat for human consumption. But they do it because they're poor, unlike meat-packers in the U.S. who didn't have that excuse. I suspect that social equality where they live would lead to a halt to this practice.

    1. Re:Trichinosis by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oops, the fact sheet is here.

  82. It becomes "interesting"... by coryking · · Score: 1

    Life becomes interesting when you meet some somebody a party who thinks he is serious and worse, agree with him! I mean, after all, clearly it is true that all textbooks are nothing but a way for socialists to push their liberal agenda. You laugh, this guy says "right on!" wants to give me a hi-five! Good times!

  83. Hey lets call it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    niggerjewcunt flu

  84. Great idea! by denzacar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Further more, I suggest we submit that for further discussion in an article of its own.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  85. I prefer... by prograde · · Score: 5, Funny

    I prefer the name Pandemic Influenza Germ...although people will undoubtedly shorten that to an acronym of some sort.

  86. Re:Colbert != comedian by sexconker · · Score: 1

    PEGGY: What we're about to see is British comedy. You may not understand all of it at first, because it's more sophisticated than what we're used to.
    BOBBY: That man is wearing a dress.
    PEGGY: Exactly.

  87. lets call it something else .. by viralMeme · · Score: 1

    lets call it, transitory chilled fever syndrome (TCFSS) or 'tranfer' for short. As in renaming Global Warming to 'climate change', made it go away .. :)

  88. Please tell me... by GeekZilla · · Score: 1

    ...that this is an April Fools Day post?

    --
    Veritas patesco per quaestio questio. Truth is revealed through questions.
  89. Surprising troll mods by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    The moderators this morning don't appear to be it-getters...

    1. Re:Surprising troll mods by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      The moderators this morning don't appear to be it-getters...

      Or Bill Posey has mod points! GOD HELP US ALL!

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
  90. Calling it H1N1 is like calling it Smith by Kelson · · Score: 1

    There are lots of H1N1 strains, including those involved in the regular seasonal flu among humans. I've seen people get it in their heads that this is not a new flu virus, because "H1N1" has been around for a while already.

  91. Dear OP: by scubamage · · Score: 1

    Get off my news site. This is not news. I don't want your opinion. You could have stated that there is just a name search. Also, get off my lawn.

  92. Re:Colbert != comedian by stewbacca · · Score: 0, Troll

    That's not to say his bit is funny; that's obviously left to opinion.

    Bah, not this stupid argument again. It is funny. It's only not funny if you are an uptight conservative who thinks he is serious. It becomes even less funny once said uptight conservative figures out he is joking, at which point it becomes really funny to everyone else around uptight conservative.

  93. Christians? Perecuted?? How Can That Be??? by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 0

    Sorry, Bruce, you must have erred and posted to the wrong website. Christians only persecute and oppress here. They're responsible for that Inquisition thing, didn't you know? And for DRM too, if I recall correctly.

    Here on Slashdot, only Muslims and atheists are oppressed. And sysadmins, but they deserve it, most will agree.

    "Christians persecuted." Hah. C'mon, Bruce, get with the 21st century, wouldja?

    1. Re:Christians? Perecuted?? How Can That Be??? by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure who you're being bitter toward, but I don't think they're around here. Or anywhere. What the hell are you talking about?

  94. most probable cause of the spread by viralMeme · · Score: 1

    The most probable cause of the spread is Air Travel

  95. Re:Colbert != comedian by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    Nah, parodying the zealotry of the right wing is funny in any western culture--English included! I lived there, and they do it just as well as Colbert (remember the funny puppets from the 80s of Reagan, Thatcher, et. al.?)

    Some stuff isn't funny if you don't get the culture, like "Little Britain" (until you live there for a couple years), but some stuff is pretty funny, even without understanding of the culture, like "Top Gear", or "The Office" (UK version).

    Then there's lowest-common-denominator, stupid humor that isn't funny in any culture, like "Mr. Bean".

  96. We live in an Internet, Radio, and Jet world by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    It's awfully confusing if everyone is using different names for the same thing. Direct translations, when translated back will (hopefully) give you back the correct name in your own language. It would be less than ideal to run some foreign language text through a computer translator (which might not be aware of the non-literal correlation), and have it give you a name which you have no idea means the same thing as Swine Flu.

  97. Mondays Flu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's call it Mondays Flu, because everybody hates Mondays.

  98. Hiney Flu by relguj9 · · Score: 1

    So in honor of your annoying and inappropriate post, I'm simply going to counter-suggest that we name H1N1 after you instead: The "Perens Flu." Does that seem fair to you?

    I think the "Hiney Flu" is more appropriate.

  99. Re:So religions have the last word on disease nami by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

    The real issue is that "Swine Flu" could describe any number of flu epidemics over the course of human history. It's not a specific term.

    "Mexican Swine Flu" would be better, if you were really wedded to the pig part.

    I think the real issue with this one, is that it leapt into the public consciousness before the powers that be had gotten around to giving it an "official" name, and now the one we have isn't really satisfying for anyone.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  100. Edgar flu after the earliest confirmed victim by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    Edgar Hernandez is the 5 year old boy who is the earliest confirmed victim of the flu.

  101. No. by Punto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let's not name a possible pandemic after some local celebrity of yours. It was funny (to you) when it was some NASA space station, but really, nobody knows (nor cares) who Colbert is ouside of US and Canada.

    --

    --
    Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

  102. Give Bruce a break by ebuck · · Score: 1

    Give Bruce a break, after all, they already named a disease in his honor, Brucellosis!

    Hey Bruce, got milk?

    Personally, I thought Colburn's stunt was a poor joke that made fun of a bad decision on how to drum up public interest in something that nearly happened unnoticed. NASA shouldn't have resorted to an open ballot democracy; some other pranksters could have called it the " capsule" or "'s folly". Colbert one-ups them with a lower blow, and NASA eventually decides the decision was a bad one, undoing any semblance of true public choice.

    When something is messed up and you exploit it, your victory is also a messed up one.

    1. Re:Give Bruce a break by ebuck · · Score: 1

      Wow, apparently slashdot filters out the asterisk. I didn't know that a person self-censoring a possible four-letter word was so offensive that the self-censorship needed censoring!

  103. MYSPACE FLU? by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    TWITTER FLU?

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  104. He may want to think about that one... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Its one thing to have a bridge or piece of orbiting space crap named after you... this not such a good idea.

    I know the swine flu seems to be overblown and sensationalized by the media etc.. right now, but who knows perhaps it mutates and kills off half the population by some trick of fate.

    Now you have the worst thing in the world named after you. On top of that I imagine that due to the catastrophic implications, history could become somewhat jumbled in the years following.

    Now you go down in history as the cause of the worst thing in the world with connotations as to your parentage and hygiene, and you name becomes worse than Hitler's!

    Ewwww! I got the Colbert Flu!

  105. We already *have* a standard naming scheme by dschuetz · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't we already name newly-emergent virus strains from the city or country in which they were first identified? (hence Ebola Reston, etc.)

    So Mexican Flu is not only accurate (that's where it first appeared, even if not strictly accurate as to its exact origin), it's also in keeping with past practices.

    And I do agree that we should start calling it something else -- even though it probably is too late. Seems like every day they're devoting time on the news to debunking rumors about getting this from pork or from visiting a farm or whatever. Time that'd be better spent on substantive matters, like how virulent is this thing, really, or what Brittney Spears thinks of it.

  106. Re:Colbert != comedian by centuren · · Score: 1

    That's not to say his bit is funny; that's obviously left to opinion.

    Bah, not this stupid argument again. It is funny. It's only not funny if you are an uptight conservative who thinks he is serious. It becomes even less funny once said uptight conservative figures out he is joking, at which point it becomes really funny to everyone else around uptight conservative.

    The response I've heard most from my 100% lefty friends when criticising his show is that it starts to feel like his persona boils down to only one joke, show after show. Whether or not one believes that, I think there's definitely room to disagree on his comedic merits, as there is with every comedian.

    I think that were I in a conservative area I'd be more inclined to have the experience / perspective you describe. As I don't have any conservative friends, I can't accept that Colbert is universally loved among everyone but conservatives.

  107. No redundancy please by Conficio · · Score: 1

    The Colbert = Sneeze
    Flu = Sneeze
    ==>
    The Colbert Flu = The Sneeze Sneeze

    Cut "Flu", The Colbert is enough.

    --
    Busy helping non technical users of OpenOffice.org - http://plan-b-for-openoffice.org/
  108. Biden Flu? by greenlead · · Score: 1

    He seems to be a big part of it already... why not name it after him?

  109. I prefer ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's call it TacoBell flu. It's much milder when it leaves Mexico.

  110. Nice try, HAM! by Explodicle · · Score: 1

    It's a known fact that Bruce Parens is a ham. He's obviously just trying to deflect the blame elsewhere.

  111. Slashdot Flu! by microcars · · Score: 1

    "Stay away from him children, he's been Slashdotted"

    --
    I like microcars
  112. Re:So religions have the last word on disease nami by muuh-gnu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > now the one we have isn't really satisfying for anyone.

    What isn't satisfying is the monty-pythonian reasoning behind the renaming (the officials didnt come up first with a name) and the fact that its an respectable and serious scientific organisation that simply plays along ald lets dumb theocracies put pressure on worldwide policies.

    Whats next then? Obligatory renaming AIDS in "gay flu"?

  113. scientist called it swine flu by aepervius · · Score: 1

    The reason for that is that there are more gene akin to what is found in influenza infecting swine than avian or human influenza. But as other pointed out we can simply name it mexican flu, like spanish flu etc...

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  114. Re:Why? He was innocent by cheftw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is modding this funny libelous or just insensitive?

    --
    Always back up, never back down. ---- Think you're cool 'cos your uid is prime? Take mine, modulo the one digit integers
  115. you are dumb by rossjp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    do not post dumb things here anymore thanks.

  116. Auction it off... by Bieeanda · · Score: 1

    That way, society will collapse due to the depredations of the Golden Palace Flu.

  117. "Ethnic reactions" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ethnic worries?

    Well.. maybe they should call it "Honor Killing" Flu. or "Rape my daughter" flu. Something to really get the white "ethnic" community pissed off.

    They don't have to eat pork if they don't want to, but they don't have the right to control my language, especially a phrase that obviously has no apparent attack on their "ethnic heritage" whatsoever.

  118. Already renamed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The swine flu has already been renamed due to it's similarity to Internet Sensation Mitchell Hayenga.... http://mitchell-hayenga-rumors.blogspot.com/ The similarities are striking, although Mitchell has not yet confirmed or denied the link via his account http://www.twitter.com/lucidresearch

  119. The Final Solution by KidPix · · Score: 1
    Check out Israel's bright idea: Mexican Flu

    Deputy Health Minister Yakov Litzman said the reference to pigs is offensive to both religions and "we should call this Mexican flu and not swine flu,"

    Yay, diplomacy!

    1. Re:The Final Solution by russotto · · Score: 1

      You know, I'm pretty sure neither the Bible nor the Koran say anything about talking about "pigs", or "swine", or any other unclean or treyfe animals. Just because you aren't supposed to eat the animal doesn't mean you aren't supposed to say the word!

  120. Re:Colbert != comedian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I must admit I don't see the appeal of Colbert. I guess it's a bit like the English obsession with Cross Dressing.

    "Heehee look! It's a man... but..heehee... he's wearing a dress... heeheehee...snort"

    "Heehee look! He's a liberal... but he's talking like Rush Limbaugh...heehee..grunt"

    There's something wrong with the world when you can make several seasons of a comedy show from the above scenarios.

    Disclaimer:
    I'm from Ireland where a large section of the population still think a redneck farmer type with a thick accent is the funniest thing ever.

    OisÃn

  121. Mexican Flu by z-j-y · · Score: 1

    Mexican Flu. out of his country.

  122. Re:Colbert != comedian by afabbro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am familiar with the memes, the subject matter, and the jokes that have come before, and 4/4 of them still aren't funny.

    Well, in that case, the problem seems to be you. Have you considered that possibly you are just a humorless twit?

    More likely, the memes you cherish just aren't that funny.

    Oh look, another In Soviet Russia joke. More hot grits. Another set of Profit!!! steps. Hey, there's that same Beowulf cluster joke again.

    You're right, the problem is that the humor is all too rich for us.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  123. The NASCAR Sprint Cup Series presents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Tamiflu 500 presented by ACE Hardware and Carl's Jr!

  124. Wouldn't That Be Cool? by dhermann · · Score: 1

    Yeah, "Swine flu" becomes "Colbert Flu"! That would be totally awesome. Then when our children and grandparents start dying from complications arising from the disease, we'll say they've been "truthified"! Hilarious!

    But why stop there? Let's rename "Darfur Genocide" to "Obama's Birth Certificate". Owned! That's so funny. How about "death by lethal injection" to "The Laura Maddox Show". Wouldn't that be so cool, guys? Guys? Where are you going?

  125. The Christian Flu by amoeba1911 · · Score: 1

    sounds like a fitting name that Muslims are sure to enjoy.

  126. Re:Other news: an outbreak of political correctnes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I vote the exact opposite as levell. Name it something extremely offensive to illegal mexicans: "the wetback flu."

    Seeing as these are the people 100% responsible for causing this 3rd outbreak, I don't even think it's that offensive.

  127. Re:Colbert != comedian by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    Well of course there will always be the opposite of "too dumb to get it" guy. You described it yourself...the far left who are so damned snooty, they think Colbert is beneath them. They are equally annoying as "too dumb" guy, but they do not elicit as funny of a reaction!

  128. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  129. PETA says to call it by olddoc · · Score: 1

    The Cute Kitty Flu.

    So we won't kill the poor little bugs.
    Viruses have rights and feelings too!

    --
    Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
  130. MIZZOD PIZZARENT UPPPP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL'iest comment EVAR at Slushdot! and insizightful too

  131. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  132. In other news... by OutSourcingIsTreason · · Score: 1

    Pigs are now called h1n1s. Charlotte is in the process of editing her web.

    --
    "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Mussolini
  133. Re:PC Flu, WW Flu, WT Flu by Ken+D · · Score: 1

    *headsmack*

    RTFM - Really Terrible Flu... Maybe

  134. Since it's lobbyists who want it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then why not give it to them - the all new, shiny and deadly - The Lobbyist Flu.

  135. Re:Colbert != comedian by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

    I stoop to meme jokes sometimes, but it's the non-meme jokes that I like best.

    Even the non-meme jokes required cultural awareness, which was the point of my OP in this thread.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  136. we already have by nimbius · · Score: 1

    a cute nickname for H1N1, its called 'swine flu.'
    hundreds of marketing professionals for big news agencies worked long into the night to find an appropriate nickname for it that would inspire both panic, and they wont stand for any other clever names that could imply the scare is manufactured to push more pills, cremes, and drugs in general onto the viewing public.

    the fact is that our fast-food society is so nutritionally bankrupt they can barely fight off the common cold without a pharmacy of prescription drugs. stop smoking, drink less, exercise more, stop asking your doctor if TV commercial drugs are right for you.

    heart disease and cancer have been, and continue to kill us faster than the flu...apparently dick pills and piggyflu have more marketability though

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  137. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  138. Re:Colbert != comedian by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

    I'm Czechrishscotgerlishdian. Czech, Irish, Scottish, German, English, and American Indian. Plus some other stuff I'm sure, but that's all the stuff that's > 1/16.

    --
    SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
  139. M.O.O.N. that spells Swine Flu! by e1ghip · · Score: 0

    I love that book/movie!

  140. What can we do to make the name stick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pray

  141. Re: by catbertscousin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, they do not "feel" this at all, it has been force-hammered into their heads from early childhood, when they minds could not defend themselves,

    As opposed to having it hammered into their heads that something which is religious is necessarily backwards and wrong? I find it interesting that one who condemns religions for their backwardness is himself so intolerant of the beliefs of others.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
  142. how about the Olbermann flu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about the Olbermann flu?

  143. Just de-1337-ize the existing name. by jonadab · · Score: 1

    If the technical name is A(H1N1), running it through a reverse-1337 filter yeilds Achini. I say we call it the Achini Flu.

    What? Why are you looking at me like that?

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  144. Bogus info, daily show says smithfield lobbyists.. by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    The origins of this flu are with CAFO's in mexico where smithfield raises some of their pigs.

    Given the dirty implications of a deadly infectious disease sprouting from a facility located south of the border in deliberate attempts to flout FDA and ethical labor standards, it's understandable the pork lobby (e.g. smithfield) would want the politicians no longer referring to this as the swine flu.

    Of course, everyone with a brain will still call it swine flu.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  145. Re:Colbert != comedian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is still a comedian even if you dont "get him", and for the record I am english and can understand he is satorising right wing republican, flag-huggers

  146. Re:Colbert != comedian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI: They make drugs that may help with your Aspergers.

    (Hint: Claiming 4/4 aren't funny means you have no sense of humor at all.)

  147. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  148. Cthulflu by wdavies · · Score: 1

    H P Lovecraft RIP

  149. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  150. Re:Colbert != comedian by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

    The most likely explanation is that the memes and "jokes" aren't actually funny in the comic sense, they just trigger that "us-against-them" reaction so common in cliques. In-jokes are rarely truly funny, they just tickle some shared experience.

    The test of a joke actually being funny comes when you can get someone to laugh at it without a half hour of showing them why it makes you laugh. Slashdot meme humor fails that test badly.

  151. Perens Flu more likely... by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    What would likely happen if this gained any momentum at all is Cobert would mock the campaign on his show and instead request the Cobert nation to all start calling it the Perens flu, after which they would promptly outnumber anyone on Slashdot or the news media, and that would end up being the name that would stick.

  152. You're all wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly, it's the manbirdpig flu.

  153. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  154. Doesn't sound too great for Colbert by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    To have your name one something that will kill 30,000+ people this year when you're not a medical researcher or doctor, doesn't sound very nice to me.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  155. Re:Colbert != comedian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am familiar with the memes, the subject matter, and the jokes that have come before, and 4/4 of them still aren't funny.

    Well, in that case, the problem seems to be you. Have you considered that possibly you are just a humorless twit?

    More likely, the memes you cherish just aren't that funny.

    Oh look, another In Soviet Russia joke. More hot grits. Another set of Profit!!! steps. Hey, there's that same Beowulf cluster joke again.

    You're right, the problem is that the humor is all too rich for us.

    Lets not forget: Oh another shitty xkcd comic THAT ISNT FUNNY.

  156. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  157. Forget naming it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By the time everyone agrees on a more "politically correct" name for the flu, or whatever the case... it will have died off. Bunch of hype.

  158. Seriously? by Burning1 · · Score: 1

    People are sensitive about disease and associations. Here in the united states, people are really touchy about sexual diseases (sex is unclean?)

    Think about it... How many people have told you about their cancer? And how many about having herpes?

    If you look at it as an issue with mental association, you can see why having 'the dirty pig disease' might be a problem in Muslim countries.

    Of course, there is a difference between the naming of sexual diseases and Pig Flu... Sexual deseases are considered shameful for their nature. Pig Flu might be considered shameful because of an association with it's name.

    If you rename AIDS to SDIAs, it'll still be considered shameful to have. If you rename 'Pig Flu' to H1N1, it'll probably make a lot of people more comfortable.

  159. Let's try this... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    Alright, Muslim Flu it is, then. Is that clean enough for everybody?

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  160. Re:Colbert != comedian by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Sorry to reply twice, but your post deserves more attention than I gave it before, mostly because you chose to overlook the majority of the conversation.

    More likely, the memes you cherish just aren't that funny.

    Oh look, another In Soviet Russia joke. More hot grits. Another set of Profit!!! steps. Hey, there's that same Beowulf cluster joke again.

    You're right, the problem is that the humor is all too rich for us.

    I see I was correct. There are a lot of humorless twits on slashdot. Now, you may not be humorless, and you may not be a twit, but I think you're way off base, for the following reasons:

    1. You chose to lump all humor in with meme humor. If you look at the majority of +5, Funny posts on slashdot, you'll see that fewer than half are meme-related. Yes, there are a lot of meme-joke attempts, but most of those are either un-moderated, or down-moderated. That's the beauty of a moderated system. If you choose to browse at a threshold lower than 3, that's your choice -- but don't bitch when you see a lot of lame joke attempts.
    2. It was a poor choice for me to use memes as the first in an incomplete list of things contributing to understanding of cultural humor on slashdot, BUT the other factors are also important. Relating to memes and jkoes that have come before: One of the great things about some of the humor on slashdot is the repartee -- the metajokes that play on memes or previous jokes. Failing to appreciate those jokes, is in my opinion, a sign of humorlessness (or of inability to understand them, which is even worse). Those are the rich jokes that exist on slashdot but nowhere else, IMO.
    3. You still miss the point of the entire thread, which is that cultural awareness is important in undertanding humor. Even the non-meme humor requires cultural understanding.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  161. Re:Colbert != comedian by Nick+Ives · · Score: 1

    I'm from the UK and find Colbert hilarious. He's right up there with Bremner during the Major years as far as I'm concerned. You do need to be familiar with current events in the USA to get most of the stuff he's talking about though.

    --
    Nick
  162. Re:So religions have the last word on disease nami by D-Cypell · · Score: 1

    Whats next then? Obligatory renaming AIDS in "gay flu"?

    That... is both offensive and hilarious!

  163. Mods? by Nick+Ives · · Score: 1

    I'm starting to wish I hadn't posted in this topic and used my points to correct the abuse in this thread.

    I don't think anyone in this thread (bar an AC or two) is trolling or trying to incite a flame-war, people are just strongly expressing their views on humour which is, of course, a matter of personal taste.

    --
    Nick
    1. Re:Mods? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      No worries, Nick. That post of mine was a bit caustic, not surprised it got a flamebait mod :)

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Mods? by Nick+Ives · · Score: 1

      Yea, it just pisses me off that any time someone posts something that someone might construe as being a bit offensive it gets whacked down to -1.

      Considering all the people like to blow their own trumpet when it comes to being libertarian I find it quite ironic!

      --
      Nick
  164. Re:Colbert != comedian by Nick+Ives · · Score: 1

    A big part of the fun is the manner in which he lays it down though, sometimes his monologues are poetry.

    Are you a fan of political satire in general? I'm not aware of anyone doing satire in the USA quite like Colbert, I've said it elsewhere today but I think he's as good as Rory Bremner during the Major year,s which were his prime - not necessarily because his work has declined in quality but because John Major had one of the most mediocre governments this country has ever seen.

    Admittedly the Colbert persona is a little restrictive but I think he's generally insightful and funny.

    --
    Nick
  165. Re:Colbert != comedian by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

    The test of a joke actually being funny comes when you can get someone to laugh at it without a half hour of showing them why it makes you laugh.

    I disagree. That's the test of a joke being more universally funny, which is not the same as testing whether a joke is actually funny.

    Consider the following jokes:

    Q: Why did the chicken cross the road?
    A: To get to the other side

    Q: Why did the frog cross the road
    A: Because it was stapled to the chicken

    The second joke is a play on the first joke, and will not make any sense to someone not familiar with the first joke. That does not mean it isn't funny. (It isn't very funny for toher reasons, but I picked that example for space considerations).

    This class of humor is called banter, and it is used extensively on slashdot.

    The most likely explanation is that the memes and "jokes" aren't actually funny in the comic sense, they just trigger that "us-against-them" reaction so common in cliques. In-jokes are rarely truly funny, they just tickle some shared experience.

    The Superiority Theory of humor has its place, but I hope you are not advocating the Strong Superiority theory... very few students of humor philosophy would consider that to hold water. Personally, I find the Incongruity Theory to be more generally applicable. In-jokes tend to have a strong superiority component to them, but the basis of the joke still tends to depend on incongruity. Within a given group of people, there is true humor to be found among the in-jokes when there are modifications, particularly applications of incongruity.

    In essence, all written humor is comprised of in-jokes due to dependence on cultural knowledge; this does not make those jokes dependent on perceived superiority of the joker and the audience, thouhgh that may be a component.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  166. Ethnic reactions???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... 'Swine Flu,' citing ethnic reactions to 'swine,' for example among middle-eastern cultures ...

    I thought we have agreed for a couple of decades now not to refer to Jewish people with the Schwein-word. Now what?

  167. I Can't believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one's come up with the:
    Cowboy Neal Flu

  168. Flying pig flu? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This flu is actually two parts swine flu, one part bird flu...

    So that would make it flying pig flu?

  169. Raffle off the naming rights. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Who would want the naming rights to a potentially deadly virus? Any company! Say Coca-Cola buys the rights; history records that the Pepsi-flu killed billions!

    So, hold a raffle (randomization to potentially big pockets from dominating thus becoming bigger). Coke spends $1B, Pepsico spends $1B, USA Fed spends $3T, Jason Fox spends $1, and there's still a chance that it could be named "Eileen Jacobson."

  170. Fcuk flu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fcuk flu

    upz...

  171. Another Suggestion by mighty7sd · · Score: 1

    In honor of Al Gore, it should be called ManBirdPig Flu.

  172. Why? by MCZapf · · Score: 1

    Is there a linked article I'm missing that explains the reason for naming it the Colbert Flu? I can't tell if the intent is to mock Colbert, annoy him, or honor him. Or was "Colbert" just the first thing that came to mind?

  173. Great. by Alexander · · Score: 1

    I missed the memo, when did /. become digg/reddit?

    Or is it just that /. has become the new, oldmedia?

    --
    "oohhh... I didn't know Schopenhauer was a philosopher!" ..."uhhh yeah, he's the one that begins with
  174. Unclean swine by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

    citing ethnic reactions to 'swine,' for example among middle-eastern cultures who feel that swine are unclean.

    So, it's offending people who think swine are unclean to use the word swine (remember, it's unclean) to refer to an unpleasant disease?? How bizarre! I'd think referring to an unpleasant disease with an unpleasant term would be perfectly okay.

    Perhaps if we called it the "fluffy bunny flu", noone would be offended?

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  175. This is bad, really bad by PPH · · Score: 1

    A(H1N1) is a hybrid of swine and avian flu.

    The only conclusion can be: Pigs are flying.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  176. Oh brother... by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    Political Correctness hits the naming of the flu. This is what happens when stupidity is coddled. It starts with warning labels. Then those plastic covers on AC outlets. Nature has no way to naturally select out idiots. They grow up and work in the public sector like politics, the U.N., or the WHO.

  177. Re:Other news: an outbreak of political correctnes by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    I guess the WHO just doesn't have enough to do. They're probably just bored. You know, maybe this is just a sign that we should give them something to do. But what? I hear they're into medicine, do you think we should maybe have them work on reducing/preventing some disease instead of coming up with new politically correct names for diseases? I know it's a bit out there...

  178. Yeah people DYING of Colbert flu would be real fun by Latinhypercube · · Score: 0

    Message to the poster of this retarded article:- "Grow the fuck up you idiot"

  179. Re: by memristance · · Score: 1

    Well, some people just can't tolerate intolerance.

  180. Just to be politically correct... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    Let's call it the Porcine-Avian-American flu. Whoa! Did anyone else just see that pig fly?

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  181. WTF is this 4chan?! by One-FISH- · · Score: 1

    Seriously? Lets stuff a poll and be internet superheroes? ...Yeah....Perens Flu indeed....

  182. Re: by muuh-gnu · · Score: 1

    > As opposed to having it hammered into their heads that something which is religious is
    > necessarily backwards and wrong?

    Did neither say nor mean that.

    > I find it interesting that one who condemns religions for their backwardness is himself so
    > intolerant of the beliefs of others.

    Well, there always is a common-sense-threshold above which you cant take a belief serious any more. Having to change the name of an disease because it has the name of an ordinary animal in it which you're not allowed to pronounce just crosses this threshold for me.

    Apart from that, there is no actual "belief" at all that a pig is bad in any certain way. People are usually just blindly unquestioningly obedient towards whatever their holy scriptures or holy führers tell them. They call it a belief but it isnt one. At least my arab friends never were able to tell me whats so wrong with pigs in islam and judaism. The only explanation they could come up with (one is a physicist, one a physician, so scientifically well educated people) was that its something their religion says and the only reason they would obey it is because not obeying small unimportant orders like the swine ban would weaken the religious jurisdiction at whole. Yawn. (So i think their so called "beliefs" are silly, but i dont tell them that in the face because i like them though and know that they dont _really_ believe that but are just loyal to their religious families, social circle and so on.)

  183. Death Flu 3000? by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    Maybe we try calling it, wishfully, The Flu to End All Flus? Fluzilla? Dead Human Flu? More Living Than Dead Flu? Best. Flu. Ever.?

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  184. Re:So religions have the last word on disease nami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ethnic reactions to 'swine,' for example among middle-eastern cultures who feel

    Actually, they do not "feel" this at all, it has been force-hammered into their heads from early childhood,...

    I'm not sure what kind of crowd you normally hang with but, if you were to hold forth on your views in a social-setting of people who were relatively well-educated in the USA, you would probably find a number of Jewish people who disagreed with you.

    And, were you to discuss the matter with them, you would find that their decision to avoid eating pork was more complex than "force-hammered into their heads from early childhood". In fact, for many the decision to avoid pork would be more a ritual in recognition of a shared heritage (like singing a national anthem), than a fear of eternal damnation.

    Some Jewish people might even find your rant to be bordering on antisemitism.

    Furthermore, while there are more Jewish people than Muslims in the USA, if you were to talk to a Muslim person in the USA about not eating pork you would almost certainly find that their decision process was similarly complex: that is was not simply fear of eternal damnation but it was also an acknowledgment of shared cultural heritage and a ritual to reinforce their commitment to being a good person.

    Me, personally, I don't eat pork either - but that's because I'm vegetarian rather than for religious reasons. My assessment is that producing pork causes a lot of suffering to pigs - and, when I have choices, I try to choose the option that causes less suffering in others.

  185. Re:Colbert != comedian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot Natalie Portman.

  186. Re:Colbert != comedian by k1773re7f · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia: 1) Build a beowulf cluster of hot grits. .... N) Profit!

    --
    This sig. intentionally left blank.
  187. Mexican Flu by BaatZ · · Score: 1

    In The Netherlands, it's officially called "Mexican Flu / Mexicaanse Griep". The meat industry indeed made an official statement that eating pig's meat is still safe, and the government backed that statement by finding a new name.

  188. Re:Colbert != comedian by k1773re7f · · Score: 1
    Wow, I wish I could mod this discussion.

    A serious intellectual treaties on comedic philosophy? Now *that's* funny!

    --
    This sig. intentionally left blank.
  189. The Colbert Phenomenon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hereby declare the phenomenon of naming things after Stephen Colbert "The Colbert Phenomenon".

    Wait, isn't that like a recursive acronym or something?

  190. Re:Colbert != comedian by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

    Wow, I wish I could mod this discussion.
    A serious intellectual treaties on comedic philosophy? Now *that's* funny!

    Well, it seems to be happening with me a lot lately, to varying degrees for various reasons. See this comment.

    I think there are a lot of humor-impaired people on slashdot, and like most nerd issues, the best way to help them overcome it is to help them figure out how humor works.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  191. What about this one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, porks are unclean, I suggest calling it "Jewish Swine Flu Virus"...

  192. You know... by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    This is only going to encourage him. I wouldn't be surprised if he gets behind such an initiative himself just 'for the lulz' as Anonymous would put it. Man, I will laugh so hard... XD

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  193. Re:Colbert != comedian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't do math, yo insenitive clod

  194. Three Words: by nesabishii · · Score: 1

    Grizzly Bear Flu!

    --
    Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
  195. We really should not ignore economic impacts by Tired+and+Emotional · · Score: 1
    Given the recession, the economy needs all the help it can get, so adopting a name that could impact all the world's pig growers and processors was clearly a bad idea.

    In any case, if only pigs caught it would we really have so much hysteria?

    We should immediately show our sensitivity to these issues, and also a love of the short stories of Saki, by renaming it the unswine flu.

    --
    Squirrel!
  196. Re:Colbert != comedian by Phroggy · · Score: 1

    Being from Ireland, you may not be familiar with American cable news channels. Count yourself lucky.

    Weird Al Yankovic parodies popular music, but "Taco Grande" isn't particularly funny today. At the time, it was comedic genius; a much-needed relief from radio stations that were playing "Rico Suave" several times a day. If you never heard the original, though, "Taco Grande" must stand alone, and although you might appreciate the general silliness (in the same way you might appreciate Yankovic's "Hardware Store"), it's not really funny by itself.

    When Colbert stands alone, he's somewhat amusing, but to appreciate his genius, you must immerse yourself in the source material. Watch Bill O'Reilly insist that his own warped views are unbiased and therefore inherently correct; watch him act like a pompous buffoon when someone dares introduce real facts into a discussion. Listen to John Gibson sign off with "and that's my word." Watch CNN and MSNBC. Watch the crap that American cable news networks are churning out every day, and THEN flip over to The Colbert Report. You'll understand a lot better.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  197. Not Severe Enough by Not_A_Jew · · Score: 0

    As anyone who's sat through a half hour of his program can attest, Steven Colbert is not an influenza virus, he is a plague.

  198. Tom the anonymous coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about the "common Colbert"?

  199. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHO suggests that the public select a new name for the virus.

    I don't know, you're the one writing the story!

    (You're missing a question mark, by the way.)

  200. I'd support Colbert by tonymus · · Score: 1

    I'd be happy to support a memorial statue of Colbert, if only he'd do his part...

  201. Re:Colbert != comedian by Phroggy · · Score: 1

    Nah, parodying the zealotry of the right wing is funny in any western culture--English included! I lived there, and they do it just as well as Colbert (remember the funny puppets from the 80s of Reagan, Thatcher, et. al.?)

    It's important to note that Colbert is parodying both the style and the message. Making fun of the right wing is great, if you happen to lean left, but making fun of shameless bias, arguing without facts, and ridiculous claims of impartiality while acting like a pompous buffoon is also important.

    Keith Olbermann, for example, is just as shamelessly biased, but he backs up his arguments with researched facts and doesn't claim to be "fair and balanced". The political message might be a good target for parody (criminal prosecutions for CIA operatives who were doing their jobs under the guidance and oversight of the US Department of Justice? Really?) and his over-the-top bias is hard to stomach even when you agree with him, but apart from that his style just doesn't warrant a parody.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  202. Re: by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    Maybe I can explain.

    You must remember, that Judaism is pretty old - it goes back for about 2500-3000 years.
    The laws of this religion were made for one important goal: surviving of a large tribe of people in a particular piece of land.
    Since the crowd is stupid and don't think long term, the only way to force them to respect survival laws is to make them believe they came from their god.

    This special thing, that pigs should not be eat, is not about fridges but about food concurrency. Sheep, cows and goats feed grass. Pigs eat everything people eat so they are compete with people for food (there was not so much food waste back then). And that is a bad idea. In other places the situation was different, pigs could be fed with acorns, but there weren't that many oaks in ancient Israel (partially because many deserts, partially because of massive deforestation for ship building).

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  203. Re:So religions have the last word on disease nami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...threaten to let their people die en masse in order to avoid pronouncing the word "swine" loudly.

    Reference needed.

    No, seriously, how on earth did this idea manage to get into your head? You actually believe that there is any one organisation out there that is willing to let people die because the disease they contracted carries the wrong name??

    Please.

    Incidentally, the name swine flu is not that appropriate -- it would lead people to think it can be contracted from pigs. The disease that the media is having a frenzy over is a variant of the flu. Might as well call it Flu'09.

  204. ritual cleanliness and swine flu by doug_hastings · · Score: 1

    Similar to Jewish Law, in Islam coming in physical contact with a pig or its biproducts renders one ritually unclean. If swine flu is 2 parts pig, does catching swine flu render believers ritually unclean?

  205. We would... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We would get Stephen Colbert to write a Slashdot article posing the question and then watch it spread.

    Oh, wait.

  206. No, that was the 1968 Hong Kong Flu by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Wikipedia says that one was an H3N2 flu...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  207. Swine are unclean, so is flu, what's the problem? by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I just don't get that one. If you don't want to say "swine" because your culture thinks that pigs are icky, well, then go wash your hands with alcohol after you meet anybody who might have it, and be happy that you'll only get it from unclean foreign infidels and not from your neighbor's pig farm.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  208. Dumbness crosses all ideologies by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Sure, some may invite it more than others...

    Back during the Bush\\\\Avian Flu PanicPandemic, some pundit who clearly must have had a liberal arts degree was being interviewed on the radio talking about "H S N I", and it took me a minute to realize that she didn't know it was "H 5 N 1"... I think it was probably the local leftwing radio station's call-in show, but it may have been the conservative station (National Public Radio :-) or right-wing wingnut radio.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  209. Re:Colbert != comedian by dwye · · Score: 1

    > but apart from that his style just doesn't warrant a parody.

    SNL disagreed, even though they probably agreed with much that he says.

    Clearly, they are better comedians than you.

  210. A Modest Proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey!

    I think we should rename EVERYTHING Colbert!

    In fact, I think we should start right Colbert!
    Colbert Colbert Colbert; Colbert Colbert. Colbert Colbert Colbert!

    Colbert? Colbert!

  211. the Perens Plague by alizard · · Score: 1

    would be equally appropriate. How can we get that name to stick?

    How many popular entertainment programs have had their hosts give NASA the same kind of consistent support that Colbert has given it in the last few years?

    I can't think of any, either. The MSM generally ignores NASA as it does Open Source.

    In a time of economic disaster, NASA is especially vulnerable to budget cuts. IOW, NASA needs all the friends it can get. The 'stuff the ballot box to name the module' got massive hits to the NASA website. Hopefully, people saw things that make them like NASA better. The administrators at NASA who were actually offended by the public daring to have an opinion probably should have their asses canned and be replaced by people who remember who pays for NASA's programs.

    Bruce, what have you ever done for NASA or advancing the cause of space exploration and industrialization that compares with the good and free publicity Colbert has given them?

    I generally agree with you, but this is genuinely stupid and I certainly will not sign on to your crusade. You do NOT speak for me and you do NOT speak for the Open Source community.

    Please tell us that you are doing this in the hope of getting free publicity from Colbert yourself. It might get you out of the sh*t you just stepped in... I can't be the only person here who is wondering if you've gone off the deep end.

  212. Re:Colbert != comedian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) In Soviet Russia, a naked Beowulf cluster of hot grits pours Natalie Portman down petrified pants!
    2) ???
    3) Profit!

  213. coitus interruptus? by Cartotype · · Score: 1

    Flus are annoying, they show up wether you want them to or not, right in the middle of something else you were doing.

    I thought you were going to say "Telemarketer Flu"

  214. Brought to you by Prescott Pharmaceuticals... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    ...the company with a 100% success rate in stopping the spread of swine flu, by killing the patients who spread swine flu.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  215. the "dirty mexican" by alizard · · Score: 1

    farm you refer to is a megafarm in Mexico owned by Smithfield Foods, a USA company, it is believed by many that the virus recombination occurred in one of their CAFO holding lagoons and departed it using houseflies as a vector.

  216. How about a boringly clinical name.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    ... that is still comprehensible to people... like Flu2009/04

  217. they seem to have forgotten something by meerling · · Score: 1

    ...citing ethnic reactions to 'swine,' for example among middle-eastern cultures who feel that swine are unclean...

    Hey guys, if you haven't noticed yet, the flu isn't exactly clean. With all the vomiting, diarrhea, and possible death, giving it a clean and happy name would be like renaming arsenic to 'honey-nuggets'.

    So if some people think it's a foul and unhealthy name, GOOD !!!!

  218. The "Colbert" virus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I proposed this, AND suggested a poll, well before the quoted authors. My (attempted) post was no less erudite, brief, and logical than their own. Oh, well, silly me, I forgot that only some will ever be printed on Slashdot. No, I'm not a regular contributor, if I haven't anything worth saying, I shutthef__kup. And no, I'm not related to the powers-that-be there at Slashdot. Nope, just an ordinary working man who had the audacity to actually attempt to post something I thought was topical, relevant, humorous, and sensible. I would have been the first to propose naming a pandemic for Colbert. That's not any sort of notable distinction for ME, I'm not whining about that, but, coming so soon after the H1N1 SWINE flu pandemic began, it might well have been something for Slashdot. That, indeed, was my intention. I stand reminded, once more, of what good intentions are truly worth.
    No, I know no one will actually see this, except for the powers at Slashdot, but, well, you're no one anyway, as far as I'm concerned. You'll be glad to hear that I'll not waste my time posting again, and I'll do what I can to make certain that others know that only "certain people" get their submissions posted on Slashdot. I'd be ashamed, if I were you, but I'm glad I'm a far better man, and make a lot more money too. Fuck you that runs Slashdot, and your fat slob horse-faced cunt of a mother too. I bet you haven't seen your penis since 1981! LOL!

  219. How about "Slashdot" flu? by Radiant_Zer0 · · Score: 1

    Let's just call it Slashdot flu. Seems to fit.

    --
    My invisible friend can kick your invisible friend's arse.
  220. The Cowboy Neal Flu by fred_kroft · · Score: 0

    Let's call it the Cowboy Neal flu, because he is such a fatty.

  221. Deadly Killer Flu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will create the fear we need...

  222. FlyingPigFlu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first Slashdot story on this mentioned it had elements or similarities to bird flu as well - hence FlyingPigFlu.

  223. Acronyms go here by Keybounce · · Score: 1

    Completely
    Ordered
    Levitating
    Bug
    Extremely
    Resistent to
    Treatment

    I don't like "Completely Ordered", and I can't see what makes a good pig reference in C.O. Anyone able to improve this?

  224. Too late by kehren77 · · Score: 1

    You've had 24 hour news channels talking about this for over a week. It's too late to rename it. Everyone is going to remember it as swine flu. End of story

    Speaking of which, who keeps letting kdawson post this crap?

  225. Re:So religions have the last word on disease nami by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

    AIDS is both descriptive and catchy: why would anyone mess with that? If they did rename it "Gay Flu" then the problem would be that the name is hilariously incorrect, AIDS being neither a flu, nor restricted to homosexuals.

    Swine flu isn't descriptive...Or rather, it is, but it's descriptive of an influenza strain that effects pigs(SIV), one that has been around for a long time. Using it to describe H1N1 variant A is stupid.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  226. Re:Bean Fail by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1
    Mr Bean the show was pretty damn funny.

    Furthermore, Rowan Atkinson is a brilliant comedian in his own right apart from Bean.

    His HBO special's finale on the invisible drum set was nothing short of genius.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  227. Can we not just call it... by strawberryutopia · · Score: 1

    Porcine influenza? "Porcine" is such a cool word that people should use more often, and "flu" makes it seem less serious that it would appear to be (or at least, it makes regular flu seem more deadly than it actually is).

    --
    I'm a leaf on the wind, watch how I soar...
    -Lucy-