Slashdot Mirror


GPS Used To Find Graves In Eco-Burial Sites

Narrative Fallacy writes "Relatives and friends will use a satellite navigation device to find graves of loved ones in Australia's eco-burial site on bushland attached to Lismore Memorial Park Cemetery, in New South Wales. Reflecting a worldwide trend towards environmentally friendly burials, the deceased will be buried in biodegradable coffins between gum trees in a protected koala sanctuary. 'It's an ideal way of utilizing land and helping wildlife and vegetation,' said Kris Whitney, Lismore Council coordinator of cemeteries. 'A family can walk around the bushland and pick a site. The body can be oriented in any direction. We promise there will be no internments within five meters. We'll record accurate GPS co-ordinates.' Families visiting graves would be lent a satellite navigation device. This will be Australia's fourth 'natural burial site' with existing sites in Tasmania, Victoria, and Western Australia."

171 comments

  1. Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Funny

    For coffins, we'd rather people used woven wicker, plantation pine or recycled cardboard. So let me get this straight? I pay money to be buried in a cardboard box?
    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    1. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 1

      If you are a baby out here they'd do that for free...

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    2. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by Fizzl · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't get it, why people find their earthly shells so importnt that they should be buried in expensive coffins with huge ceremonies.
      It doesn't concern me one bit what happens to my carcass after death.
      I recall my father once said he'd like his body just dumped to ocean in a bag after he's dead. Later he switched to wanting to be cremated and the ashes sprinkled in a forest where he used to play as a kid.
      Well, he was cremated but my gradparents found it atrocious for him to be buried in common land and after all they got a burial place on "blessed" land for the urn.

    3. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by tezbobobo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Prove it. When you're dead, arrange for your body to be sent to me. What should you care what I plan for it.

    4. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I really can't figure out why you think the poster you're replying to would care. He'll be dead. There are people who clearly don't care all that much: where do you think medical cadavers come from?

      Personally I agree with my grandfather on this one: you can chuck me on a compost heap once I'm done.

    5. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by vidarh · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I don't get why you find it difficult to believe. I have the same attitude.

      But I wouldn't send my body to some random stranger for the reason that it might matter to my relatives. I might not care, but if they do, then I'm not going to rob them of the possibility of having a ceremony or whatever they'd like.

      If they decide they'd be happy to let you do whatever you have in mind to my dead body, then what do I care?

      It's not like I visit the grave sites of m dead relatives - I'd rather think of them in happier terms than as a rotting corpse, so the whole obsession with funerals is really quite distasteful and alien to me.

    6. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by superash · · Score: 1

      The best way is to just burn the whole body up! That is what is done for people of the Hindu religion. That is much better than rotting carcasses underground with worms and what not. Well, the dumping of the bones and ashes into the rivers might be that good an idea, but still it is better.

    7. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Insightful
      why people find their earthly shells so importnt that they should be buried in expensive coffins with huge ceremonies.

      The ceremony's not for the dead. It's for the ones left alive, so they have a sense of closure.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    8. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arrange for your body to be sent - WHEN YOU ARE DEAD? That I'd like to see.

    9. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by Fizzl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Uhh... Okay. Would you prefer UPS or DHL?

    10. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      I agree 100%.

      I'm dead. Gone. I'm not going to care what happens. As far as I'm concerned, you can truck my body to the local electrical plant & throw it in, to help provide cheap electricity to warm people's homes.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    11. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      >>>"It's for the ones left alive, so they have a sense of closure."

      Like I care. I'm dead. The ones who are left alive have a far better deal than what I've got (non-existence).

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    12. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by Asuranceturix · · Score: 1

      Being a /. reader, it's more than probable that it's a guy. What could you possibly want *his* body for? ;)

    13. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by Inda · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't chuck meat on a compost heap. You'll attract rats.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    14. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      The people left alive are the ones paying for the ceremony. Why do you care what they do with the money?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    15. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by August_zero · · Score: 1

      You are missing the big picture here

      "Um, yeah we buried Grandma right here at these coordinates.. Right see we don't use headstones and we made sure the ground looks exactly like it did before we buried her here so you might not even be able to tell that we buried anyone here at all! What do you mean you think I just ditched the body in a ditch somewhere and then told you it was buried here? That is preposterous!"

      I would be impressed if "eco" burial meant that they ground your loved one up for compost and then grew you some fruit or something.

      --
      On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
    16. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by edittard · · Score: 1

      I pay money to be buried in a cardboard box?
      It's the second greenest way to go. After Soylent.
      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    17. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight? I pay money to be buried in a cardboard box?

      Well, it's not exactly like you'll notice...

    18. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may bury my body down by the highway side
      Babe, I don't care where you bury my body
      when I'm dead and gone

      You can bury my body down by the highway side
      Lord, my old evil spirit can
      catch a Grayhound bus and ride.

    19. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by JudgeFurious · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Exactly. Is it too much to ask for "the dead" to just STFU and let us get on with our ceremony?

        Honestly, I'm going the cremation route because I couldn't care less about this stuff. My wife feels the same way but my mom is just outrageous in her demands. I swear you would think the woman has a Pharoh complex or something. She's got this big plan where my brother and I have her cremated and then pour various "subsets" of her ashes into the Tennessee River, Mississippi River, and the Gulf of Mexico. This has something to do with each of the places he's lived being represented or some such conceited bullshit. She'll be dead and on top of that she won't even be a body, just a box of ashes!

        These wishes will not be honored. No chance in hell of that happening. She's getting turned into ashes and then it's all going in the Gulf. That's where the rest of it empties out anyway right? Close enough. Just imagine the price of gas as we drive all over the southern U.S. trying to do this?

        It's pure insanity. We love her but this is just over the top.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    20. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

      The ceremony isn't for you, it's to help your relatives and friends through the grieving process. You might not care about what happens to your body, but for your family, it's all of you they have left. If you've got no one who cares about you, then sure, feed your body to sharks. It doesn't really matter.

    21. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that in all of the States, one is required to be buried in a MINIMUM of a cardboard box -- even if you are going to cremated. A cardboard box the size of a person and able to support the weight of a human will run you about $120-$150.

    22. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by brunokummel · · Score: 1

      I don't get it, why people find their earthly shells so importnt that they should be buried in expensive coffins with huge ceremonies.

      believe it or not, the irony of it all is that the cerimony and the "holy place" is not for the dead person, but for the ones still living....

      --
      What is best in life? To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you and to hear the lamentations of their women.
    23. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by brunokummel · · Score: 1

      OMG!...Soylent green is people!!

      --
      What is best in life? To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you and to hear the lamentations of their women.
    24. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by operagost · · Score: 1

      Like I care. I'm dead.
      Seems like you don't care while you're alive, either.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    25. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by Kozz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Generally, I have the same feeling. Tradition (alone) makes me somewhat guilty for not visiting the graves of my own dearly departed, but my memories serve me well. I've always been fully interested in donating any and all usable organs upon my death. I've even considered donating my body or skeleton to my former school for teaching purposes. The main thing that gives me pause is that I don't know how these things (organ donation, body donation?) impact the ability of my loved ones to have a ceremony of their choice, providing them closure. Anyone know how this works? Can you have both?

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    26. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by fastest+fascist · · Score: 1

      Well, you're not the one who's going to be doing the burying at your funeral.

    27. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      Most shipping companies have policies against shipping human remains.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    28. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by protolith · · Score: 1

      Better a cardboard box than a giant toilet.

      "gather the bereaved around to say good by"... Flush

    29. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who wants to be cremated and slipped into the tea at the funeral.

    30. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by John+Whitley · · Score: 1

      You're quite right in that ceremony (funeral or otherwise) can be a useful transition tool for the living. But it's not the ceremony per se that many object to, it's how the body of the deceased is dealt with afterwards. Personally, I find using good land to hold onto the preserved corpse of a deceased loved one... wasteful and gruesome. Put another way, casket burial just doesn't scale well.

    31. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      >>>"The people left alive are the ones paying for the ceremony."

      Not usually. Most of the time the money comes from the deceased, and I'd prefer they spent my money on something useful -like a new car- rather than waste it on my soon-to-be-wormfood body. (Perhaps I should put that in my will: "This money may not be used for burial services; go buy yourself a new car instead, or maybe a trip to Europe.")

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    32. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by hxftw · · Score: 1

      Clearly you care, otherwise you would have offered FedEx!

      --
      Just because an idea is popular doesn't make it right.
    33. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This money is for my friends and relatives.

      Pay them in euros :P

    34. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people left alive are the ones paying for the ceremony when otherwise they would get that money spent on the ceremony, greedy relatives...

    35. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Sounds good to me, just so long as they don't put the "In Loving Memory of..." sticker on the back windshield.

      Why that trend is successful is beyond me, I couldn't come up with a less appropriate memorial if I tried. Mobile, gas guzzling, temporary, ill maintained, destined to ultimately rust away on a scrap heap - is that what the memory of your (not you specifically, the people with the stickers) loved one means to you?

    36. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Bury an orange/apple/banana above their coffin when you bury them.
      2) Wait for a few years.
      3) Pick fruit.
      4) ???
      5) Dead Person = Fruit!

    37. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by diagonal_mambo · · Score: 1

      You should at least put your body to good use. How many starving children are there in the world?

    38. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw the cardboard box....

      Bury me naked with my ass sticking out of the ground. That way my friends will have a place to park thier bikes when they come visit my grave.

    39. Re:Way to go to make me feel like a goldfish by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Most of the time the money comes from the deceased
      True, but since the deceased person is, well, deceased it does at that moment belong to the relatives; they could equally just stick it under the mattress. And the funeral, really, is for them - the survivors.

      I hope mine have a few beers, talk about how brilliant I was, have a few more beers and then the conversation gets round to what an utter asshat I was. They'll miss me less that way.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. Eco?! by rishistar · · Score: 1, Insightful

    With all the technology involved in keeping this going would it really qualify as eco anymore? Cremation would certainly overall be more environmentally friendly than this, if not for the immediate habitat.

    --
    Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    1. Re:Eco?! by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

      It certainly seems overly complex. Eco? Who knows? How are those GPS satellites maintained? Oh, kudos for keeping sight of the forrest...

    2. Re:Eco?! by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't forget your encouraging humans to go into Koala habitats. And place "litter" (glass vases with flowers, picnic supplies, or even worse depending on the family and their practices) and their smell around the area (wild animals hate the smell of us as much as we hate the smell of them and they hate the smell of one another...).

      Really I totally agree with dumping bodies in the woods (ok, burying them deep even to make sure stupid animals don't try to eat our preserved, disease ridden, Prozac and Ritalin bloated corpses). It is "more natural" to some extent. But telling the family where the body is is rather...impractical.

      Who wants to bet in about 5 years there will be gravestones and markers set up by families who are either sick of or found errors in the GPS software (or simply assume that in a few generations the company will go out of business).

      --
      Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
    3. Re:Eco?! by Yvanhoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Eco doesn't mean technophobic. It means that it is workable for everyone on the planet to do the same in a sustainable fashion.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    4. Re:Eco?! by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

      It strikes me that catacombs were probably the most 'economical, ie. least disruptive to the environment - thousands in a very small area. And you wouldn't need a GPS, a map would do.

    5. Re:Eco?! by dintech · · Score: 1

      Yes but last time I checked, putting 3 GPS satelittes into space wasn't an eco-friendly operation.

    6. Re:Eco?! by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

      and now he wants everybody to have one? A GPS reciever, of course...sustainable?

    7. Re:Eco?! by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It certainly seems overly complex.

      The eco-burial cemetery in Western Australia is Pinnaroo, and if you'd seen how it works, you'd realise it's not particularly complex in practice.

      All cemeteries maintain burial records, normally based around plot and grid numbers. In the eco-burial system, GPS coordinates are used instead. Likewise, family who wish to visit graves aren't dumped in the bush with a GPS and ration pack. There are walking trails around the cemetery, and the burial plots are not far off the paths.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    8. Re:Eco?! by funkee2000 · · Score: 1

      You can safely presume it's just using the standard GPS satellites available to all consumer-grade GPS devices, such as the 1000's of windscreen-mounted GPS's sold every day for cars. If you have your own GPS then you could use it rather than hire theirs.

    9. Re:Eco?! by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      They're already *in* space though, so why not make use of them? Surely it would be more wasteful to burn all those resources putting GPS satelites up there, and then not use them because it was so polluting to launch the things.

    10. Re:Eco?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and around here, they put bodies in the ground with markers on top. Oh wait, this is a solution in need of a problem. More work for the undertaker. They have to eat too.

    11. Re:Eco?! by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Well, I do know there are technophobic ecologists out there, but because something is polluting doesn't mean it is not ecological or sustainable. We can afford to create non degradable stuff, to put greenhouse gas into the atmosphere up to a certain extent.
      Put a satellite into orbit, plant a few hundred trees. Ecology is about sustainability. It is about preventing the release of non-recyclable materials and depletion of non renewable materials.
      Based on this, the eco friendliness of orbital launch depends on the method used. Russians use kerosene. That's bad. European and (IIRC) Americans use half hydrogen+oxygen reaction, which is good, and half a solid fuel which atmospheric impact I don't know but that doesn't rely on non-renewable resources for production (as far as I am aware of). A fully hydrogen+oxygen launch would be pretty eco-friendly. It would cost a lot of energy, produced in potentially polluting power plants, but that tends to improve and is in no way an inevitability.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    12. Re:Eco?! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      "Likewise, family who wish to visit graves aren't dumped in the bush with a GPS and ration pack."

      Aw, too bad. Count me out then.

  3. Composting... by thesupraman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You seem to miss the point...
    Dead bodies break down nicely and help to increase the fertility of the soil. The point is to help the trees grow.

    And I would not be surprised if this is being done in an area a touch short of such organic matter..

    Of course, if people really cared they may want to consider that GPS is rarely accurate to 5m, its not uncommon to get an EPE of 15-20m in that arts of the world..

    1. Re:Composting... by timmarhy · · Score: 1
      I can confirm this. unless you have very expensive gps gear that has been calibrated off a known survey point, your best accuracy is 20m.

      but honestly, does anyone believe the claim no one will be buried within 5m? when they start running out of room the temptation to make that 5m to 2m will be too great.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    2. Re:Composting... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They allow headstones made from local rock. 15m should be close enough for most people to find the grave.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    3. Re:Composting... by nihongomanabu · · Score: 1

      I also imagine some spots would be be more popular than others.

      Bereaved Widow: I want my husband to buried here. Is this spot taken?
      Salesperson: This spot? (On top a hill next to a tall oak tree, over looking a beautiful landscape) I promise none of the hundreds of customers have picked this spot prime before. Your husband's spirit will be very comfortable here.

    4. Re:Composting... by Psychotria · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unfortunately many Australian plants are adapted to live in low-nutrient conditions. The area (Lismore), however, maybe supports rainforest trees in the area where bodies are to buried. Rainforest trees don't mind the high nutrients (although, not all species would be accustomed to the increased nutrient load). But, the article speaks of Koalas. Koalas do not live in rainforest--they live in areas dominated by Eucalyptus and other sclerophyll species. It could be argued that, this being the case, that the body would be adding nutrients to an environment that is naturally low in nutrients and, therefore, be contributing to a problem rather than helping it.

    5. Re:Composting... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course, if people really cared they may want to consider that GPS is rarely accurate to 5m, its not uncommon to get an EPE of 15-20m in that arts of the world.. I regularly get 4 metre accuracy in Australia. I used my ETREX to mark the locations of my wife's grandparents graves in Malaysia a couple of years ago. But I backed it up with photographs showing the site in context with the surroundings. The pics ensure reasonable accuracy.

      I used a GPS on that occasion because it was in a huge overgrown Chinese cemetary and the people who guided us there won't be around forever either. I plan to leave the data with my nephew who will know how to use it in the future.
    6. Re:Composting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      when they start running out of room

      Yeah, right. Australia is really "running out of room".
    7. Re:Composting... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I can confirm this. unless you have very expensive gps gear that has been calibrated off a known survey point, your best accuracy is 20m.
      Wow. My GPS must be something real special then. Funny, it only cost me $100. You'd figure such an unusually accurate device would cost a hell of a lot more.

      Come to think of it, my friends Car GPS seems to be just as accurate....tracked us right to his exact address....

      but honestly, does anyone believe the claim no one will be buried within 5m? when they start running out of room the temptation to make that 5m to 2m will be too great.
      They're talking about using wildlife preserves as burial sites. Do you have any idea how much land is available?
    8. Re:Composting... by paskie · · Score: 3, Informative

      You, sir, have apparently never geocached. My $75 GPS can be accurate up to 3m in very favorable conditions, and 5m-9m accuracy is normal.

      --
      It's not the fall that kills you. It's the sudden stop at the end. -Douglas Adams
    9. Re:Composting... by syncrotic · · Score: 1

      Survey-grade GPS units using RTK corrections from a base station are centimeter accurate; they're the primary survey tool in the mining / road construction industry. They're generally backpack sized units with a ~10cm circular dish antenna, so they're not what visitors will receive to locate their relatives' bodies, but such units are probably what the operators would use to keep track of burial locations.

    10. Re:Composting... by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 1

      so they're not what visitors will receive to locate their relatives' bodies, but such units are probably what the operators would use to keep track of burial locations.
      ...and another reason for the five metre minimum distance between burials - that way, they can loan out the bloody-expensive-and accurate-enough-but-not-backpack-sized units to the people visiting Grandma, and still have a reasonable chance of visitors finding the right grave.

      When the bush setting itself becomes the memorial, and there's at least the belief that a loved one's atoms are perfusing the living system you're walking through, the exact location and boundaries of the grave might become less important to visitors. Besides, with no burials within five metres it'll probably be fairly easy to pick out the right spot from either the slight mound or slight depression. I'd imagine that a lot of people would want to plant a suitable tree on the grave too; a native, in soil loosened to a depth of six or seven feet, would really take off and become a natural burial marker in a couple of years.
  4. rotting carcass by timmarhy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I astounds me that people buy shit like "freshness liners" for coffins, or give a crap about the softness of the coffin pillows.

    people, when you die, YOU WILL BE ROTTING MEAT. no different to that cat/dog you buried when you were 12.

    Look at it this way, no matter how much of a useless bastard you were in life, if your buried in the ground with trees around you, you'll finally be put to good use.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    1. Re:rotting carcass by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And your viewpoint is what makes atheists look very bad. Why?

      Religion has two major things it accomplishes: a creation myth and a death myth. Many, many people cannot grasp the idea that you will be worm food when you die. They instead seek things like Heaven, enlightenment, or Valhalla as a means to cope with what they do not understand.

      As long as these people are peaceful, let them have their beliefs, as it does not hinder what happens. And if somebody is 10% more efficent/successful/happier because of it, I see no reason to burst their bubble.

      --
    2. Re:rotting carcass by BSAtHome · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Both religious and non religious people are allowed to voice their own thoughts and ideas. Yes, let the religious have their believes, but could you then extend the courtesy to me too when I say that my believe is no believe? I am very comforted by the fact that I will be wormfood when I die. Call it my personal heaven to know that I'll be recycled by nature. I don't need religion to accomplish any comfort for either creation or death.

    3. Re:rotting carcass by timmarhy · · Score: 1
      And where did i mention religion or atheism?

      the concept of an afterlife in modern religions is purely spiritual, people are well aware their bodies will rot when they die.

      good job revealing your bias in your attempt to drag the conversation in a different direction though.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    4. Re:rotting carcass by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1
      I see. When faced with a culture full of people denying reality, embracing delusion, and condemning anyone who doesn't share their delusion as "immoral,"...
      electing only other delusional people as leaders, leaders who then go on to say that people who don't share the delusion "should not be considered citizens," ... printing names of fairy tale characters on currency, constantly fighting to get their mythology taught to everyones children in schools...
      ...spending billions fighting wars with people who have dissimilar delusions, each side convinced their delusions are the "good" ones and the enemy's delusions are the "bad" ones...

      and someone living in this world makes the non-delusional "look bad" by quietly saying "um, that stuff's not true."

      Gotcha. Atheists have to sit down, shut up, stay in the closet, because pointing out reality and letting people know of our existence "makes us look bad."

      But wait, not just look bad, you say look VERY bad. So if he were delusional and believed that anyone who didn't share his delusions was immoral and would suffer eternal torture for it, and expressed that belief publicly, he's ok - hey, he could even run for president. But saying "um, that's not true..." is out.

      I dunno whether you're an atheist or not, but people who say things like YOU have said are the ones who make atheists look bad, by defining atheism as something offensive that has to be hidden.

      --
      This space available.
    5. Re:rotting carcass by jmv · · Score: 1

      Many, many people cannot grasp the idea that you will be worm food when you die. They instead seek things like Heaven, enlightenment, or Valhalla as a means to cope with what they do not understand.

      The two aren't incompatible. A religious person (which I'm not) can believe that their body becomes worm food, while their soul/spirit/coredump goes somewhere nicer. That's probably how eco-burial should be sold (and probably how it already is).

    6. Re:rotting carcass by focoma · · Score: 1

      Thanks but no thanks for your "leave those poor ignorant people alone, you enlightened but hurtful jerk!" defense of us "myth-believers". I know you meant well, but I just can't seem to accept your charity for some reason.

      Now, I've only heard the religious phrase "ashes to ashes, dust to dust" a bajillion times since my parents first taught me religion, but if it makes you more efficient/successful/happy, then by all means continue believing that religion blinds people from realizing that the body becomes a "rotting carcass" (as timmarhy puts it) in death. `Coz, you know, only religious people who believe in the after-life would POSSIBLY want to buy silly freshness liners for coffins.

      Certainly such things as simple-minded sentimentality or vanity, which I'm sure you Science-loving atheists are immune against, have absolutely nothing to do with it. ;-)

      --

      - Francis Ocoma

      Please wait while Sig Request is being processed...

    7. Re:rotting carcass by value_added · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As long as these people are peaceful, let them have their beliefs, as it does not hinder what happens.

      My own preference is to be buried in an unfinished pine box somewhere in my backyard, preferrably under a big tree (for the shade, of course) or a garden of some sort, but California prohibited that kind of thing a hundred years ago. So much for allowing personal beliefs. ;-) Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if burying one's pets in a similar natural, eco-friendly manner is just as illegal.

      Anyone familiar with different funeral traditions knows the subject is complex, and often inseperable from one's upbringing or culture. The Orthodox (the folks who cross themselves east to west), for example, don't believe in cremation, and the church canon expressly prohibits it. IIRC, it was only recently that Greece (a country with mostly rock as soil) allowed cremations to take place, but only for the minority that isn't Orthodox.

      For most westerners, I suppose, the subject doesn't evoke strong opinions one way or the other, save for the excesses of those choosing to be buried a '57 Cadillac, or more typically, in silk-lined, stainless steel, hermetically-sealed coffins.

    8. Re:rotting carcass by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      California prohibited that kind of thing a hundred years ago. So much for allowing personal beliefs. ;-)
      What if whoever owns the house in 50 years time believes that he doesn't particular like finding skeletons when he's gardening?
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:rotting carcass by jamesh · · Score: 1

      My own preference is to be buried in an unfinished pine box somewhere in my backyard, preferrably under a big tree

      How about being stuffed and mounted on a hammock under that big tree? The view would be better!

      I'd bequeath my body to science, but I have a feeling they'd bequeath it straight back again (apologies to DNA :)
    10. Re:rotting carcass by value_added · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What if whoever owns the house in 50 years time believes that he doesn't particular like finding skeletons when he's gardening?

      I doubt many folks garden at depths of six feet. And if they did, the well fertilized flowers/shrubs might make up for the inconvenience.

    11. Re:rotting carcass by jandersen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think timmarhy has a very valid point - I don't know of many religions, vertainly not in the West, where the physical remains of a person are of any significance, even if you believe in life after death in some form. And I find it deeply revolting to see how the burial industry preys on people when they are most likely to be vulnerable.

      On a personal note - I have indicated very clearly to my children that I don't want them to spend money on cemetries and memorials. Instead I want to be cremated; then they can split the ashes and bury them under a bush or whatever they feel like. That will be cheap and straight forward, and it will give them a lasting memory if they want it. Or feed the body to the vultures, like in India. At least they only go after the dead remains, not the bereaved when they are most vulnerable.

    12. Re:rotting carcass by Inverted+Intellect · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Call it my personal heaven to know that I'll be recycled by nature." Reflecting on this statement makes me realize something about myself... this thought also gives me an immense sense of comfort, which I find odd. I'd like to be of use after my death, preferably through organ donation and/or being laid to ground in some way. I've considered signing up as a post-mortem test-subject for medical studies, but the thought makes me somewhat uncomfortable for some reason. I may or may not change my mind on that subject. I've read something about freeze-drying human remains for use as compost, but afaik this option isn't available where I live. In any case traditional burial and cremation are not options I'm considering,

    13. Re:rotting carcass by Inda · · Score: 1

      Fair play to you for wanting to give something back after you die. I feel somewhat the same.

      C02 is my aim. Give the trees their breath. It's a greenhouse gas for me.

      Yours truely,

      Evil bastard, who is is hellbent on taking my revenge on the living. I hate you all... :)

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    14. Re:rotting carcass by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      But there's your problem - are amateur undertakers going to bother digging down that far? Is it even possible in built environments due to cabling, pipes and the like? And there are health issues too, I believe cholera has been known to spread that way.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    15. Re:rotting carcass by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      Take the eco-trend another step toward it's science fiction future: to help feed the poor, we are going to recycle your remains into foodstuff (cue Charlton Heston!)

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    16. Re:rotting carcass by kklein · · Score: 1

      Huh? How does he make atheists look bad? No "modern," widespread religions believe that the body is anything other than rotting meat. The soul is eternal, not the body.

      Christians talk about being really physically resurrected when Jesus comes back in their "resurrection bodies."

      I don't believe in heaven (anymore), but even if I did (and even when I did, in my evangelical Christian upbringing), I wouldn't really care about my body after death--my soul would be with Jesus, etc. Just not even a concern.

      My still-very-Christian family also in no way goes for all this funereal hokum, and even rebukes it as un-Christian, because it fixates on the transient physical existence which is simply the first step of an eternal one. Because they believe in souls, the idea that a fuss would be made over the vehicle is blasphemous and ignorant. This view is shared by fundamentalist Muslims, and as an atheist, I have to agree that it is the proper way of looking at things.

      Dressing up a piece of meat and pretending it's your dead mother is sick, IMO. Your mother was made of her actions, words, thoughts... Not her arms and legs. Your mother is gone. Let it go.

      Finally, you seem to be overlooking the fact that these are products that are sold to people when they are emotionally fragile and vulnerable and oftentimes in denial about the death. The funeral industry is vile and evil. These are products that no one in their right mind would buy, but that's just fine because no one in their right mind is ever offered them! It's cruel.

      Burn 'em up, grind the bones, and dump it somewhere that reminds you of them, or that they asked to be dumped at. That's what my family does, both for religious and atheistic reasons.

    17. Re:rotting carcass by mh1997 · · Score: 2, Funny

      when you die, YOU WILL BE ROTTING MEAT
      Correction: when YOU die, YOU WILL BE ROTTING MEAT. I on the other hand plan on living forever - 40 years and I haven't died yet!
    18. Re:rotting carcass by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      "Many, many people cannot grasp the idea that you will be worm food when you die."

      I'm not sure where you're coming from on this issue, but I think you miss the point of the difference between body & soul.

      Heaven AND 'rotting worm food' are not mutually exclusive.

      --
      -Styopa
    19. Re:rotting carcass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Genesis 3:19: "In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return."

      Please stick to defending your own beliefs.

    20. Re:rotting carcass by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Not even once? Impressive.

      --
      Why not fork?
    21. Re:rotting carcass by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      Hell is other people. And so is heaven.

      After death you "live on" through other people's memories. Good memories are heaven. Bad memories are hell.

      We are stardust. And we are memes.

      --
      -
    22. Re:rotting carcass by brunokummel · · Score: 1

      Many, many people cannot grasp the idea that you will be worm food when you die

      Actually since i'm narcoleptic, I'm afraid of being fed to the worms while taking one of my naps.

      --
      What is best in life? To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you and to hear the lamentations of their women.
    23. Re:rotting carcass by Dennys48 · · Score: 1

      It's not possible for anyone to "burst my bubble" about what happens after death. They don't know either. And once they do know, they can't tell us.

    24. Re:rotting carcass by Kozz · · Score: 1

      But oddly, nearly all burials here in the US (save for certain religions which require a plain wooden box, etc) most of the time your body is placed in a casket and THEN the casket is placed within a concrete vault in the ground.

      Now that's something I don't really get at all. Why the concrete vault? What purpose does it serve? (It proves all those "floating caskets" in the movie Poltergeist are bogus, eh?)

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    25. Re:rotting carcass by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Muslims bury their dead in simple white shrouds. No coffin, no lining, no Armani suits.

      We are against worshipping graves though. And there is a thin line between saying Salaam to a dead person and worshipping (asking for favors, intercession, etc.) that we should be careful not to cross.

      The shrines that you see in the Muslim world are shameful reminder that Shaitan is whispering to everyone.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    26. Re:rotting carcass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The myth of resurrection depends on having at least part of the body intact, for reasons more that just to be fertilizer.

      http://holyspirit-shekinah.org/_/sacrum_bone.htm says that many religions consider the sacrum bone (at the tip of the spine) with resurrection, and think that the whole human body will be resurrected from that particular bone. Since bones contain DNA, this may not be impossible.

      So having the body around somewhere underground would be relevant. Why bury it underground? To protect the DNA from damage by cosmic rays. ;) Ideally, we should be using lead coffins.

    27. Re:rotting carcass by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Id go further id say they heaven lists being rotting worm food as a dependence.
      It conflicts with hell (some body should probably tell bush that) which also depends on rotting.
      The dependency on purgatory was recently removed though
      It may have some conflicting libraries with atheism, but nobody is quite sure what the libraries do or which libraries it uses, so it s often safe to ignore this conflict.

      Ive always planned on being buried upright in a cardboard box, and my mother whos fairly religious has no problem with that. Arguing against this on religious grounds, is like arguing against organ donation on religious grounds (except for those religious which actually prohibit it), its not religious its just that there's a large overlap between people that people who dont want to donate organs and religious people.

      The important thing with this and organ donation, is to tell your family, thats what you want to do, because otherwise it wont happen/will upset them.

      p.s i wonder if they'll upload the data to googleearth?

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    28. Re:rotting carcass by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Why bother with the box?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    29. Re:rotting carcass by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      I've also always wanted to be buried in something quickly biodegradeable - I'd like to know that some tree grew stronger or taller because of me.

      However, you'll find in the US that this can sometimes be problematic. Nevertheless, I've discovered in my state (MN) that in most cases you can be buried on private property without the cement vault required.

      --
      -Styopa
    30. Re:rotting carcass by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      There is the issue of groundwater contamination. Without the concrete vault, literally thousands of bodies buried each day come into contact with groundwater and can leech biological contaminates into the groundwater. This makes life unpleasant for everyone nearby.

      Jewish cemetaries which accept unsealed burials I suspect are far more regulated. Being there are fewer of them and fewer Jewish burials, this is probably not as big a problem and can be managed. I do not know how it is managed, but it would not suprise me to find that Jewish (and Muslim) cemetaries are required to be enclosed to prevent groundwater contamination of any type - just like a landfill.

      Just try to arrange a burial without the required concrete vault. It is illegal in most places. You might be able to do it if you own the land and it is outside of any city, town or village. But there may be overriding county or state regulations to prevent it.

    31. Re:rotting carcass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh. It's not the idea of becoming compost that skeeves me out -- it's that it's most likely to be used landscaping someone's McMansion or a golf course. Screw that.

    32. Re:rotting carcass by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      It bugs me that people spend a lot of time thinking about how hermetically sealed they want their box and don't put any more thought into the headstone than, "as big and ostentatious as possible." And put no more information than their name and a pair of dates shallowly engraved `on environmentally unprotected granite stone.

      I want my marker to be useful to people. So, I'd like as complete a genealogy as possible (and anything noteworthy that I may have accomplished) engraved in tiny print on bronze plates, then coated with vapor deposited quartz or something. (need to get thermal expansion coefficients close, I think, so quartz might not be the perfect choice.)

      If even one descendant finds it useful, it will be better than a hundred of those stupid statue of a saint perched atop a giant cross resting on a platform of classical columns monuments people seem to think is worth the money.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  5. Ok... Why? by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

    Im going to look at something completely different: used land mass..

    Light Map of the world.

    Why this? This shows where population is via light pollution. If we pay attention to Oceania, we see that very little land mass of Australia is used, in opposition to places like the eastern US, most of Europe, and Japan.

    Why would a little-used large landmass country like Australia use this, and not the densely packed countries?

    --
    1. Re:Ok... Why? by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      Totally off-topic, but I find it interesting how dark Norway is. I think they have as dense population as Sweden which is much brighter and much denser than Finland, which is bright in the southern part and dark in the north.

    2. Re:Ok... Why? by allcar · · Score: 1

      I would have thought it was precisely because they have so much land that they can do this. Only one body in 75 square metres. No British cemetery can offer the same.

    3. Re:Ok... Why? by vidarh · · Score: 1

      Totally off-topic, but I find it interesting how dark Norway is. I think they have as dense population as Sweden which is much brighter and much denser than Finland, which is bright in the southern part and dark in the north. Norway has a population density of around 13 people per square kilometer, and of that population, about a quarter is located in a small region in the South East, with most of the rest in a narrow band around the coast. Sweden has twice the population, concentrated heavily in the south but more evenly spread out over a larger region of the south than in Norway (the entire centre of the bulbous part of Southern Norway is mountains).
    4. Re:Ok... Why? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I expect this burial method would take up MORE space, not less. You can be buried in any orientation, wherever you want (so long as you're not within 5m of someone else). Standard cemeteries lay everybody out on a grid, which you can bet is designed with the intention of packing in as many bodies as possible.

      Plus cemeteries demand the most space where population density is highest anyway, because (for some reason) people like to visit graves. So even in Australia, where there's tons of empty land, cemeteries will tend to be clustered in the big population centers anyway.

  6. $2000 ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lismore will be charging about $2000 for a natural burial site, rather than $3000 for a conventional one.

    I fortunately have yet to be personally involved in any funeral planning, so I have no idea if this is typical... but that seems a bit much for a cardboard box and a hole in the ground!

    1. Re:$2000 ?! by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      You're neglecting to consider that you're not just paying for the box, and the hole, but the ground the hole itself is in. Basically, you're paying the money to insure that the land isn't used for something else by buying it yourself. That land could be used for all sorts of profitable ventures, such as vegetable farming or the construction of rental properties. You have to offer them enough money to make selling you the land more profitable than any of the alternatives.

      Luckily, if you and several thousand others each pay $2,000, you can have a very large graveyard indeed!

    2. Re:$2000 ?! by will_die · · Score: 1

      The $2000 does not go for the usage it is already a protected park. A few of the other ones of this nature I have heard about work by purchasing an area then donating it to a tax free wildlife group with the condition that they can still bury people under it. They get a tax break right off and a really high profit burial site(no upkeep, no taxes, basicly nothing after the interment). Thier only upkeep are the GPS devices and maybe a person to provide the GPS device and minor help.
      Also a normal low cost burial goes for $3000 so by the time you remove costs for the higher cost coffin and provide landscaping it is high profit. For normal funerals in both the US and Australian are right around the same in the $5000-$6000 range. Exchange rate is currently $1US is $1.05AUD.
      As a comparison when my Grandmother died 2 years ago she was cermated and ashes scattered at sea and that cost in the $700 range.

    3. Re:$2000 ?! by raddan · · Score: 1

      It's a shame that burial costs so much. After all, we have our own dirt and shovels. I like the idea of a muslin bag "coffin". OTOH, does "being thrown by a trebuchet" count as a donation to science? ;^)

  7. Go Lismore! by sisko · · Score: 1

    My home town! Woo!

    (Seriously, you don't want to be buried there.)

    1. Re:Go Lismore! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Seriously, you don't want to be buried there.
      You mean you wouldn't be seen dead there?
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Go Lismore! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm also a native of Lismore - I wouldn't be bragging.

      Left over 10 years ago for uni in Brisbane. I remember the gold ol' days of the powerhouse nightclub. The only place to be (and go) at night.

  8. Fabulous Idea by bluemetal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I for one think this is fantastic. It gives one the opportunity to be buried in a way that is helpful to the environment, in a way, peacefully restore yourself to the earth, and at the same time give your family the satisfaction of knowing where you are buried. I for one like the idea that I could put my hand on a nearby tree and say that someone I loved is now a part of that tree. It may sound all fluffy-puffy, but the fact is, burials have always been charged with all sorts of religious and spiritual notions. I believe for a good number of people, this type of burial would satisfy those notions indeed.

  9. GPS Accuracy by zanderredux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We promise there will be no internments within five meters.

    How can they guarantee this if civillian GPS is (said to be) only accurate to 15 meters?

    1. Re:GPS Accuracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that were true then surveyors would still be using and transits and compasses... well, they do, but that's not the point. Don't confuse consumer GPS with professional grade. The latter is accurate to within a few millimeters, if you're willing to occupy a station for the better part of a day and then crunch the numbers against NGS atmospheric data for the period.

    2. Re:GPS Accuracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Replying to my own comment... Clinton turned off GPS signal degradation on May 2, 2000.

      http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0BMD/is_84_6/ai_61915190

    3. Re:GPS Accuracy by BlackHole+Basement · · Score: 1

      If that were true then surveyors would still be using and transits and compasses... well, they do, but that's not the point. Don't confuse consumer GPS with professional grade. The latter is accurate to within a few millimeters, Being accurate is not the problem, It's the funeral director asking his/herself: "Now where did I put those GPS coordinates of your grandma; DAMN IT!?!".
    4. Re:GPS Accuracy by edittard · · Score: 1

      no internments within five meters
      Stupid sarcastic comment: They're going to bury them in a series of tubes?

      Sensible sarcastic comment: It wouldn't exactly be a practical place to build a prison, would it?
      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    5. Re:GPS Accuracy by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Mostly because [common handheld civilian] GPS is accurate to around five meters now-a-days. Surveyor grade GPS is down to centimeters.

    6. Re:gps accuracy by Hasmanean · · Score: 1

      GPS can be accurate to less than a centimeter, if you track the carrier phase and use that in your measurements.

      However it is tough to get absolute accuracy at that level, but you can with differential positioning i.e. if you calibrate yourself first (walk to a marker with a known position), and then walk around within a certain radius.

      --
      Hasan
    7. Re:GPS Accuracy by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

      I guess they'll keep all their interns at least 15 meters away from any interments .

    8. Re:gps accuracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with the inaccuracy of gps how can i be sure i'm dancing on the right grave? wouldn't want to disrespect the wrong grave. RTFS

      We promise there will be no internments within five meters.
  10. Great news by jandersen · · Score: 0, Troll

    So, this qualifies as "News for nerds, stuff that matters" because you can use GPS to find the graves? Interesting.

  11. I have Karma to burn... by thegermanpolice · · Score: 1

    Wait for it...

    So by using GPS they can find the "dead" centre.

    sheesh... felt like a pun was in order...
    thank you I'm here all week... Unless modded -5, GET OFF SLASHDOT...

    1. Re:I have Karma to burn... by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      How dare you joke about such a grave topic!

      I heard that this is a really popular burial method...people are just dying to try it!

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
  12. Dead bodies in a koala sanctuary?!? by clickety6 · · Score: 4, Funny


    Don't the fools realise that this is exactly how ghoualas are created, their furry little faces covered in fresh corpse blood as they howl at the moon in their squeaky ghouala voices, dropping out of eucalyptus trees on grieving mourners to gnaw their ears off, using their big fuzzy ghouala ears to locate fresh bodies by the sound of the worms gnawing and their big cute ghouala noses to track the scent of newly planted meat...

    Stop them now, before the ghoualas get us all !!!

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    1. Re:Dead bodies in a koala sanctuary?!? by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Don't the fools realise that this is exactly how ghoualas are created, their furry little faces covered in fresh corpse blood as they howl at the moon in their squeaky ghouala voices, dropping out of eucalyptus trees on grieving mourners to gnaw their ears off, using their big fuzzy ghouala ears to locate fresh bodies by the sound of the worms gnawing and their big cute ghouala noses to track the scent of newly planted meat... I think you got it wrong. Ghoulas are created in axotl tanks.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    2. Re:Dead bodies in a koala sanctuary?!? by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

      That's axlotl. You may retain your geek card if you can name one or more Bene Gesserit who succesfully infiltrated the Bene Tleilax.

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
  13. Eco FriendlY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because digging a hole in the middle of nowhere and hauling a corpse there to bury is a good use of fuel.

  14. Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can use GPS for spatial location now??

  15. Re:bloody drop bears!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    fyi if your not from down under ;)
    the ghouala is a close relative of the drop bear. [Fron wikipedia]Drop bears are commonly said to be unusually large, vicious, carnivorous koalas that inhabit treetops and attack their prey by dropping onto their heads from above. ...things like having forks in the hair or Vegemite or toothpaste spread behind the ears will deter the creatures.

  16. Religion has got no right of havign a free-pass by aepervius · · Score: 1

    It ain't a question of bubble bursting, it is a matter of opinion, and for some a matter of lack of evidence. But even if you only consider it an opinion, I don't see why religion should get a free pass to get to say whatever they wish on death/origin, but other folk like atheist get lambasted because "they burst the bubble of those poor theist". Well tough luck. If it is only an opinion, both are as valid and can be told as loudly as the author want, on a soap box as high as they can make it. And incidentally, coddling too much the people don't help society/human as a whole to evolve better philosophies and societies.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  17. Because by Gewalt · · Score: 1

    Because, what could possibly be more eco-friendly than launching a satellite?

    /boggle

    --
    Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    1. Re:Because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. That's right. The cemetery is launching a GPS constellation of their own. Not just buying a Garmin at the local outdoors shop and using the existing system.

  18. Your Friendly Sys Admin Says: by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

    I sure hope they remember to redundantly back up that database. We wouldn't want people staring at the wrong gum tree thinking their grandpa is making it so green instead of a surplus of koala poop.

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
  19. I live in Lismore... by the_raptor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live in Lismore, the area is not short of fertile soil. Most of the region has volcanic soils that have had hundreds of thousands of years worth of rain forest mulched through it. This effort is purely for effect, being cremated and having the money thus saved go towards planting trees would be much more "eco".

    It is because of the rain forests that all the "eco" nuts swarm to the region, leading to the rain forest further shrinking so that more houses can be built. On some of the most fertile soil in the state. Idiots.

    --

    ========
    CINC, 4th Penguin Legion
  20. Mark my words.... by DiamondGeezer · · Score: 1

    ...these people are digging their own graves. Its the thin end of the wedge.

    --
    Tubby or not tubby. Fat is the question
  21. gps accuracy by DMoylan · · Score: 3, Funny

    with the inaccuracy of gps how can i be sure i'm dancing on the right grave? wouldn't want to disrespect the wrong grave.

  22. I prefer cremation and scattering by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Scatter the ashes on a body of water and you can "visit" anywhere on the coastline. Of for the more practical-minded, you've got something to use to grit the sidewalk when it snows.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:I prefer cremation and scattering by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      If you've already cremated the body then you can "visit" just by breathing.

    2. Re:I prefer cremation and scattering by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Of for the more practical-minded, you've got something to use to grit the sidewalk when it snows.
      Errr, the story is from Australia : while it's not quite a continent utterly devoid of snow, it is a very scarce natural commodity. Far more scarce than any other continent with the possible exception of Africa.
      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  23. Why Not Go One Step Further and Include RFID? by bratwiz · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Why not go a step further and toss an RFID chip in along with the body-- or attach it to the body. Then you could loan the loved ones a GPS and an RFID reader-- make it cool-looking like a Star Trek tricorder (Original Series or Next Gen...??? Hmmm...)

  24. Science by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why not donate your body to science?

    They seem to have pretty good service - and it's free. If you want to cremate the leftover parts, they will do that, too. You can pick the ashes up for free, or have them sent to you through certified mail for only $15. (Way cheaper than your local crematorium.) Either way, someone gets some use out of your leftover meat.

    --
    Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
  25. Geocaching by MDMurphy · · Score: 1

    In related news, a group of Cub Scounts got a shock when visiting a geocache site, expecting to find plastic figurines from Skippy, the Bush Kangaroo.
    http://geocaching.com.au/dashboard/au/nsw/

    1. Re:Geocaching by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      Damn you! Now that song is going to be in my head for the rest of the day with visions of slowly turning helicopter blades!!!!!

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    2. Re:Geocaching by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      I'm so evil. I sent that link to my kids.

      Now they're infected.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  26. Ooh, excellent opportuinty for a muder mystery... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know there's going to be a murder mystery novel written now where someone tries to commit "the perfect crime" and buries their victim within 5 metres of someone already buried there.

    Then they can go through elaborate GPS and radar tracking to find more victims or something.

    I'm sure CSI:NSW could use a pilot episode.

  27. thermal depolymerization by Jodka · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with thermal depolymerization?

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
  28. "Found it!" by Equis · · Score: 1

    TNLN SL TFTC

    1. Re:"Found it!" by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

      STF. (sigh...)

      Took deceased's gold dental fillings and wedding ring, left dirty old golf ball, SL.

      TFTC!

  29. Koala Yummies by waveformwafflehouse · · Score: 1

    Those koalas will really be endangered when my zombie bones raise from their biodegradable coffins.

  30. Koalas! by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

    the deceased will be buried in biodegradable coffins between gum trees in a protected koala sanctuary

    Oh great. Now what's going to happen to the visitors once the koalas learn that they like the taste of dead human flesh?

  31. I want a SPECTACULAR EXTRAVAGANZA! by spun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Okay, bear with me here. This is a bit complicated, as it involves bungie cords and dirigibles.

    First I'll need a medium sized hydrogen filled aerostat. It doesn't actually have to be a dirigible, any old hydrogen filled aerostat will do. If several thousand dollars worth of fireworks could be hung from the outside, that would be lovely.

    Next, I'll need about a thousand feet of bungie cord, a suit made of cotton padding or wick like material, and several gallons of gasoline. Put my corpse in the suit. Attach one end of the bungie cord to the dirigible and the other to my corpse. Securely fasten my corpse to the ground with some sort of quick release mechanism.

    Douse my corpse in gasoline. Let the dirigible go until the bungie cord is nice and taut. Light my corpse, and activate the quick release.

    If all goes well, my flaming corpse will shoot into the sky and collide with the hydrogen filled, fireworks encased dirigible. Hopefully the resulting explosion will vaporize my body so that not too many steaming gibbets fall back on the amazed crowd.

    And that, my friends, is what I would like for my funeral.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:I want a SPECTACULAR EXTRAVAGANZA! by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      The downside is that your plan is a one shot deal, and I don't think you've done your math completely as I'm pretty sure your bungie won't bring you all the way up.

      Essentially you'll end up in flames while floating away under the dirigible until the bungie burns through. Then you'll fall to earth as a burning pile of goo.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    2. Re:I want a SPECTACULAR EXTRAVAGANZA! by spun · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your input. I'll obviously need to add rockets to the set up.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:I want a SPECTACULAR EXTRAVAGANZA! by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      Don't be such a downer, it would work. The dirigible just needs to be big enough to exert serious tension on the bungie so that the upwards force would be enough to launch him higher than the dirigible. If you've seen the video of the guy doing the reverse base jump using stretched bungies you know this is possible. Enough tension and he would go shooting straight through the dirigible which could then ignite the rockets attached to his body resulting in even greater altitude gain and a more spectacular show.

      You just have to plan these things properly.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    4. Re:I want a SPECTACULAR EXTRAVAGANZA! by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      Only on slashdot could one find a comment starting with the phrase "Okay, bear with me here. This is a bit complicated, as it involves bungie cords and dirigibles"!

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    5. Re:I want a SPECTACULAR EXTRAVAGANZA! by RobinH · · Score: 1
      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  32. Cremation ecoUNfriendy by xaxa · · Score: 2, Informative

    Cremation is very eco-unfriendly. You need a really hot oven (800C or something), and you're burning the body. Burial is better. If you don't want burial, then one option permitted in some countries is to freeze the body and then use ultrasound to shatter it into dust.

  33. Human bodies are not ecological by Frantactical+Fruke · · Score: 1

    I seem to recall that here in Finland, you are not allowed to bury a person just anywhere - because human bodies are classed as toxic waste. During our long lives, our fatty tissues collect so much pollution through our food and by breathing that it's not a matter of trace amounts by the time we're dead. Mercury, PCB, lead etc. After all, every food administration in the world still allows *trace amounts* of poison in your food...Don't eat animals from the top of the food chain...

  34. DHL by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

    Most shipping companies have policies against shipping human remains.
    I see that you've never been a DHL customer.
  35. Re: Zombie Koalas!!! by ashitaka · · Score: 2, Funny

    Eats shoots and Braaaiinnnssss!!!!

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  36. cardboard box by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

    So let me get this straight? I pay money to be buried in a cardboard box?
    That's the difference between you and my ex-wife.
  37. Body and Soul by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    I see replies pointing out the difference between the body and the soul as though these are both real concepts. Unless more evidence shows up, one of these is a real physical thing and the other is just wishful thinking. The "soul" is now what the religious want to be the part of them that continues on forever and never dies. The part of them that will experience that joyful afterlife because they realize the absurdities of projecting the physical self into the afterlife. For example, if I were to meet my grandfather after death, would he be the funny, joyful, joking man with the thick Lancashire accent that I last saw, or the angry, delusional Alzheimer's sufferer he was the last two years of his life?

    Once again, unless proof shows up, the body and the "soul" are one and the same. That which you call your conscious is a function of the electrical activity in your brain. Once that activity stops everything that existed as part of your thoughts and memories is gone too. That is the scary reality that people don't want to face.

    In the face of that some might take the sarcastic view of burial, but I take it as an incentive to achieve as much as possible within this lifetime without being an asshole. My belief is that I won't see my wife, kids, parents, relatives, friends or anyone else after I die. I will only live on in what people remember of me.

    And if I am wrong and a nice party is waiting on the other side, it will be a very pleasant surprise.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  38. Eco-friendly by mdielmann · · Score: 1

    The thing I like most about this is the lack of embalming fluids, etc. There's nothing quite like adding a bunch of toxins to your corpse so the bugs can't decompose it quickly to improve the quality of the environment. Also, in those climates where the temperature and humidity favour it, I think drying the corpse out first is a good thing, too.
    I also think there's something to be said for cremation of corpses with certain diseases. CJD (or kuru, if you will) can be spread from corpses that have been dead for a while, and other diseases fall into the same category. It's far more eco-friendly to destroy those infectious agents before interment.

    --
    Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  39. This is very important for Aussie /. geeks... by the+saltydog · · Score: 1

    ...more than likely, this will be their *only* opportunity to be buried deep in the bush.

    (Sorry, I couldn't resist, nor could I be bothered to read at -1 to see if anyone else had mentioned it. It's just how I roll.)

  40. Selective availability! by wsanders · · Score: 1

    Yeah, if there's a war and the US turns SA back on you'll be S.O.L.

    Koala sanctuary? Oh, you're in the dingo feed area instead!

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  41. Mafia? by Prien715 · · Score: 1

    Burying bodies in unmarked graves in the wilderness? Doesn't the mafia have some kind of patent on this technology?

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
  42. mod up parent, has clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod up parent, grandparent is clueless. even bottom-of-line trimble can do sub-meter under reasonable conditions. bizarre conversation, i would have expected more gis/gps people here.

  43. Let us hope... by Saberwind · · Score: 1

    ...that nobody posts the GPS coordinates of the dearly departed to a geocaching site.

  44. But maybe I WANT my interns close! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But don't let there be any other interments next to me and Monica....

    --Bill Clinton

  45. Two words by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

    Soylent Green.

    1. Re:Two words by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      We already eat Soylent Green.

      The only difference is that the bodies have been processed by worms and bacteria and transformed into dirt, which is then absorbed into plants, and eaten by us. Our nutrients come from soil which is rotting bodies/plants.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.