Slashdot Mirror


NASA Plans to Smash Spacecraft into the Moon

djasbestos writes "NASA is planning to smash a spacecraft into the Moon in order to look for hydrogen deposits in the poles. More notably, it will impact with significantly greater force (100x, per the article) than previous Moon collisions, such as by the Lunar Prospector and Smart-1 probes. Admiral Ackbar was unreachable for comment as to the exact location and size of the Moon's thermal exhaust port."

176 comments

  1. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Many Bothans died to bring samzenpus this information...

    1. Re:Obligatory by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 3, Funny

      Of mesotheliosis?

    2. Re:Obligatory by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      No, they are going to pilot the spacecraft.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    3. Re:Obligatory by Deadfyre_Deadsoul · · Score: 1

      I sense a new season of Thundarr. All sense aside. NASA wonders why they don't get funding any more? You know I bet if they planned to crash a ship into Iran, Bush lite would fly down personally with the Government credit card.

      --
      ~DF
  2. That's no moon... by rhomboid · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's a space station...

    --
    -Rhomboid
    1. Re:That's no moon... by Workaphobia · · Score: 4, Funny

      Obligatory response: http://xkcd.com/307/
      I find my lack of freedom to do otherwise disturbing.

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
    2. Re:That's no moon... by philspear · · Score: 2, Funny

      And there it is, the last star wars quote ever on /.

    3. Re:That's no moon... by nebaz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I just played a heart in every round of Hearts. Against Bill Gates. I call it "shooting the moon with a big ass spacecraft doing mach 100!"

      --
      Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
  3. Practising... by PinkyDead · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...for another Mars mission, eh?

    It had to be said - even if it is terribly trolly.

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    1. Re:Practising... by martin-boundary · · Score: 5, Funny

      Either that, or the Russians weren't impressed by the recent satellite shootdown, so the top brass want to do one more missile test with a slightly bigger satellite.

    2. Re:Practising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Or you can only get the current administration to fund Dukes of Hazard style 'science'.

    3. Re:Practising... by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The press may call it "Moon lander mission goes horribly wrong due to multiple system failures," but NASA calls it "retasking."

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Practising... by Himring · · Score: 1

      Don't you watch tv? We never landed on the moon. We never made it into space. We obviously didn't shoot down that satellite as it didn't exist. I say, there is no russia either. These conspiracy theorists are weak I say! Weak!!!

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  4. hehehe... nice way to put it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's easier this way as one does not have to worry about those pesky "landings".... just smash it to smitereens and call it a day! :)

    1. Re:hehehe... nice way to put it by KDR_11k · · Score: 3, Funny

      So... They want to deal with starting and flying but not landing? Oh my god, call the DHS!

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  5. Wrong guy surely by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

    Admiral Ackbar led the attack on the second Battle Station. The thermal exhaust port weakness was on the first.

    1. Re:Wrong guy surely by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heh, I'd bet all my mod points that you get modded up for this.
      A: You corrected someone's error
      B: It was Star Wars related
      C: You made fun of someone who thought he was funny, but many people don't.
      D: You dead panned it.

    2. Re:Wrong guy surely by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not going to happen now that you explained it to death, and then picked apart its corpse for good measure.

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    3. Re:Wrong guy surely by dzfoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are right. We should try contacting General Antilles, who's in charge of the small rebellion planning an attack run on the battle station. I heard he just received some secret plans to it.

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    4. Re:Wrong guy surely by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually the weakness was on both, that's why they went after the second one.. and it was a trap. In fact, the weakness was on all the big craft of the era. Star Destroyers were just as vulnerable to "Trench Run Syndrome" as the Death Stars. Snub starfighters were so successful at taking out large ships using TRS that the Imperial tactic of leaving small ships to planetary defenses had to be changed, thus creating the Lancer-class ships. Kuat Drive Yards designed and developed the first Lancer-class frigate with twenty quad-laser cannon batteries designed specifically for starfighter hunting. Ironically, the Imperial Starfleet found the Lancer-class too expensive for full fleet deployment. A few frigates made it into various fleets, but most admirals preferred to use, and subsequently lose, their TIE starfighters as anti-starfighter options. As a result, most Lancer-class frigates, like smaller ships before them, were assigned to rear guard operations and planetary defense after all.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    5. Re:Wrong guy surely by MSZ · · Score: 5, Funny

      Life, get you should.

      --
      The moon is not fully subjugated. I demand a second assault wave preceded by a massive nuclear bombardment.
    6. Re:Wrong guy surely by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Gotta read something when the code is compiling.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    7. Re:Wrong guy surely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      False!

      The Second Death Star was built with millions of millimeter-wide exhaust ports to prevent that same attack from succeeding. This is the reason why they had to attack the station while it was still under construction. It is also why they had to FLY into the superstructure and blow up the reactor core directly.

    8. Re:Wrong guy surely by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Umm.. did you miss the part where the Emperor said the second Death Star *wasn't* under construction and that it was all an elaborate trap? I can understand, seeing as he talks like this all the time, but it was kind of a big plot point. The second Death Star was identical to the first.. it was built at the same time as the first.. the Emperor just wanted the Rebels to think it was built in response to the first being destroyed.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    9. Re:Wrong guy surely by peter.stocking · · Score: 0

      What is wrong with you guys? It was Jan Dodonna. Everyone knows that. http://lay-uh.ytmnd.com/

    10. Re:Wrong guy surely by aproposofwhat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gentoo user, huh?

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    11. Re:Wrong guy surely by ozbird · · Score: 4, Funny

      Admiral Ackbar led the attack on the second Battle Station.

      Allah'u to his friends.

      The thermal exhaust port weakness was on the first.

      If someone shot a proton torpedo up your exhaust port, you'd have a moment of weakness too.

    12. Re:Wrong guy surely by Eagleartoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not going to happen now that you explained it to death, and then picked apart its corpse for good measure.
      It's even worse, the OP didn't qoute who he was belittling so now his correction stands out there like a naked British royal, and the horsebeater who replied to that also cuts of his nose to spite his face in laughing at this guy's expense because noone knows what the first guy was talking about. You sir, however, have rightly decimated the second party. I will fall victim to your folly as well, for I am criticizing and commenting without having any context of the original idea put forth for comic value.
      --
      -You have been modded appropriately-
    13. Re:Wrong guy surely by manifoldronin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure.

      --
      Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
    14. Re:Wrong guy surely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad it wasn't a photon torpedo (ala Star Trek). Then the sun really would shine out your ass...

    15. Re:Wrong guy surely by mr_matticus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Umm.. did you miss the part where the Emperor said the second Death Star *wasn't* under construction and that it was all an elaborate trap? Yes, because that never happened.

      http://blogs.starwars.com/static/img/image-selector/full/original-trilogy/episode-vi/02.jpg

      Clearly either under construction or not identical to the first.

      "Rather than rely on thermal exhaust ports to vent the reactor's incredible excess heat, the second Death Star would instead funnel the waste energy through a series of millimeter-wide heat dispersion ducts."
      -Starwars.com, http://www.starwars.com/databank/location/deathstarii/

      Sucks to be you.
    16. Re:Wrong guy surely by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think the main weakness of the second death star was the huge 'half is missing' hole on one side.

    17. Re:Wrong guy surely by tcolberg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lieutenant Porkins never gets any credit!

    18. Re:Wrong guy surely by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      I assume you're referring to the line: "Now witness the firepower of this fully ARMED and OPERATIONAL battle station!" Which only indicates that the Emperor ordered the Deathstar II's weapon systems to be completed before the rest of the station was. There's no indication that the second station was built at the same time as the first, and then partially dismantled so it would look like it was under contstruction. Additionally the variances in the main weapon system on the two Death Stars indicates some shift in the technology between the two.

      I do admit that the Emperor calling the Deathstar II "fully operational" is rater misleading, as it was obviously missing large portions of its interior. However, I believe most people who watch the movie take that statement in context with what we see of the Deathstar II and understand that the Emperor is speaking purely in terms of offensive systems, and possibly TIE Fighter squadrons.

    19. Re:Wrong guy surely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I so wish you could get a score of +10 funny for that 1

    20. Re:Wrong guy surely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sucks to be you Are you sure about that?
  6. Admiral Ackbar by Samball · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's a trap!

  7. How long... by Lifyre · · Score: 5, Insightful

    before someone tries to blame high tide, beached whales, and global warming on us crashing shit into the moon?

    --
    I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
    1. Re:How long... by roguetrick · · Score: 5, Funny

      I blame lunacy.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    2. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's madness!

    3. Re:How long... by Thrashing+Rage · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Maybe this is some sort of goverment effort to control the weather/global warming......hmmm?

      whats a tin-foin hat made out of again?

    4. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      No. This... Is... NASAAAAAAA!
      (kicks probe into gravity well)

    5. Re:How long... by ad0n · · Score: 1

      Lunacy, yes. But the root cause was that Chairface Chippendale had designed a giant heat ray designed by Professor Cromedome to carve his name into the face of the moon. http://home.jps.net/~lsnyder/moon.jpg

    6. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that it's the oil.

    7. Re:How long... by Applekid · · Score: 1

      before someone tries to blame . . . beached whales . . . on us crashing shit into the moon? Why else would we send whalers to the moon?
      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    8. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Bush's fault.

      Since he was the president at the same time that these plans were announced.

    9. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tonight, we dine, In TYCHO!

  8. Someone has to get this out of the way early... by thegermanpolice · · Score: 0, Troll

    They'll probably miss...

  9. I didn't know planned failure was okay... by philspear · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am planning on failing my midterms. I expect to fail this midterm by significantly more points (100x per my plans) than previous failures. I am doing this in search of hydrogen deposits in the poles.

    1. Re:I didn't know planned failure was okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Remote sensors indicate methane around Uranus

  10. zzzz by apodyopsis · · Score: 1

    well now, lets hope they have better luck looking for hydrogen deposits then the Beagle Martian impacter of a few years ago...!

    I mean, seriously, we can get two robotic rover probes on Mars for >3 years but are reduced to slinging a dumb mass to the moon?

    1. Re:zzzz by philspear · · Score: 1

      Why go to all the trouble to put a rover on the moon? Get some binoculars, you'll be able to see everything a multi-million dollar robot on the surface would.

    2. Re:zzzz by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      I'd so like to have binoculars that allowed me to see the moon as well as a microscope a hundredth of an inch away from the spot...

    3. Re:zzzz by Darfeld · · Score: 1

      For the same reason we send rover to Mars instead of just looking at the planet from above with satellites I suppose...

      I bet it wouldn't cost a single million dollar to build the rover (sending it to the moon could be an other matter thought. And I mean sending it so it can work once arrived. Craters don't count here... But maybe you can group some stuff in the rocket to divide the cost.)

      Anyway, if the hydrogen is under the surface, rover won't do the job. The Dumb mass can do it and is much cheaper so...

      But there is still a question : Why doing things simple when you can do them complicated?

      --
      (\__/) This is Lapinator
      (='.'=) copy it in your sig
      (")_(") so it can take over the world
    4. Re:zzzz by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      And collect soil samples.

    5. Re:zzzz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly would we protect a rover from the well documented effects of moon dust? The thing wouldn't last a week trying to roll around there.

  11. Has to be done by FoolsGold · · Score: 5, Funny
    This is Slashdot, so I better get a good old tradition out of the way before someone else does I suppose...

    NASA officials has released a press statement saying the spacecraft will not require any special programming to direct it towards a collision with the Moon. They simply plan to install Windows Vista on the craft and let nature take its course.
    1. Re:Has to be done by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Funny
      Your information is out of date. In simulations Vista slowed the machine down so badly by the time it got up enough speed to crash the moon was out of alignment. In light of these simulations (and do to budget constraints) they have decided to go with plan b-which will consist of a robotic arm plugging a usb scanner into the underlying Windows 98 operating system at the appropriate time. This will result in further savings in hardware and fuel by lowering the system requirements from "need a second mortgage elite" to "cousin cleetus wally world special".


      For further information please see the paper entitled "Using complex instability for positive gain: The use of underlying instabilities inherent in proprietary operating systems with undocumented functions to achieve net gains in proposed Unmanned Procedurally Programmed Missions for Interstellar Scientific Study (UPPMISS) " at NASA.gov

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:Has to be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In related news:

      NASA Lunar Probe evaporated in solar atmosphere. Failure blamed on third party software.

  12. And the bidding begins by n3tcat · · Score: 2, Funny

    NASA needs funds right? So they should sell the right to name the new crater on ebay.

    1. Re:And the bidding begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is "Uranus" taken?

  13. Unfortunately by TummyX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Unfortunately, due to a failure to perform a metric/imperial conversion, the mission failed when the probe performed a perfect soft landing on the moon's surface.

    1. Re:Unfortunately by mpe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately, due to a failure to perform a metric/imperial conversion, the mission failed when the probe performed a perfect soft landing on the moon's surface.

      Be even more embarrasing it it missed completly. Most ammusing though if it orbited the moon once and crashed back onto the launch pad...

    2. Re:Unfortunately by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Even more embarrassing would be to fail so miserably that the probe landed on the sea and they spent a year reporting having found water and living organisms on the moon.

    3. Re:Unfortunately by bob_jordan · · Score: 1

      That would be preferable to missing entirely, slingshotting around and smacking into earth on the way back.

      Bob.

    4. Re:Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. A boomerang probe.

    5. Re:Unfortunately by j4s0n · · Score: 1

      Isn't that a premise of an old Twilight Zone episode?

    6. Re:Unfortunately by 97cobra · · Score: 0

      Isn't that a premise of EVERY old Twilight Zone episode?

  14. Since a certain Mars mission has been mentioned by hyades1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    may I suggest that NASA replace their somewhat embarrassing "Faster, better, cheaper" motto with "Closer, cheaper, deeper"?

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:Since a certain Mars mission has been mentioned by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Funny

      replace their somewhat embarrassing "Faster, better, cheaper" motto with "Closer, cheaper, deeper"?

      That's even worse. It sounds like the tagline for a porn movie.
    2. Re:Since a certain Mars mission has been mentioned by s74ng3r · · Score: 0

      You certainly missed "harder"!

    3. Re:Since a certain Mars mission has been mentioned by ArAgost · · Score: 1

      Why not "Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger"? It already has some connections with space flight

    4. Re:Since a certain Mars mission has been mentioned by Ranger · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. "Harder, faster, deeper." sounds like the tagline for a porn movie. Yeah, NASA.

      --
      "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  15. Gamma ray telescopes? Feh. by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

    If there's anything that would get the public interested in space, it would be something like this. Why aren't they soliciting the public to name THIS noble craft? But I shouldn't kid myself: to really capture general interest, it would be needed to launch many crafts to bore holes such that, viewed from Earth, a person's name were to be spelled out. "Come," we could shout, "be the person to be remembered forever as having put the first and surely forever largest man-made eyesore upon the moon!"

  16. Mooninites by roguetrick · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is what happens when you screw with boston.

    --
    -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    1. Re:Mooninites by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      That ol' Gorgatron's gonna get what's coming to him.

  17. unmannedihope tag by dwater · · Score: 1

    So, this spacecraft is going to be built by Apple? Funny name. I don't predict a good future for it.

    --
    Max.
  18. In other news... by Thanshin · · Score: 5, Funny

    NASA Plans to Smash Spacecraft into the Moon Following NASA's new trend of sincerity, Burger King releases a new set of products under the name "Die fat bastard! Die" and NIKE presents the new AirSlave collection.
    1. Re:In other news... by yakmans_dad · · Score: 1

      So far, that's the funniest post on this I've seen. (Currently rated "3"? Sheesh.)

  19. Not green by TropicalCoder · · Score: 1

    The overall energy of the impact will ... kick up 1,102 tons of debris and dust.

    ...and suppose water is a limited resource, and they just blew away/polluted a significant proportion of that reserve?

    1. Re:Not green by todd1000 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, we're just not too bright...

    2. Re:Not green by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why green? The moon is kind of a dull grey isn't it?
      So wouldn't the Lunar equivalent term for environmentally friendly be "Grey"?

    3. Re:Not green by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

      On the scale of moon size (or the size of the area), and for any 'reserve' amounts, 1102 tons means 'insignificant quantity far less than estimation error', not 'significant proportion'.

    4. Re:Not green by east+coast · · Score: 1

      If this impact contaminates a significant proportion of the water reserves on the moon than they're not worth the trouble anyway. But in all reality that would be like me saying that if we did a test in Pittsburgh would it contaminate the waters in Dallas? It simply of such a small scale effect against such a massive landscape that it's pretty much unthinkable.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    5. Re:Not green by justthinkit · · Score: 2, Funny

      One thousand, one hundred and two tons of debris and dust.

      Plus or minus 500 tons.

      --
      I come here for the love
    6. Re:Not green by TropicalCoder · · Score: 1

      It simply of such a small scale effect against such a massive landscape that it's pretty much unthinkable.

      It is peculated that only creators at the south pole who's depths are in permanent shadow may contain water ice. How many creators would that be, anyhow? - after this test - one less - whatever the count!

    7. Re:Not green by mapsjanhere · · Score: 1

      I don't know if to mod this funny for a typo so reversing the meaning of the post, off-topic for bringing ID into the discussion, or flamebait for the blasphemy of suggesting the existence of multiple creators.

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    8. Re:Not green by TropicalCoder · · Score: 1

      I don't know if to mod this funny for a typo so reversing the meaning of the post

      Look it up - Peculate: verb; meaning to both speculate and postulate at the same time.

    9. Re:Not green by mapsjanhere · · Score: 1

      will do, in the meantime, your homework assignment crater (krtr) 1. A bowl-shaped depression at the top of a volcano or at the mouth of a geyser. Volcanic craters can form because of magma explosions in which a large amount of lava is thrown out from a volcano, leaving a hole, or because the roof of rock over an underground magma pool collapses after the magma has flowed away. 2. A shallow, bowl-shaped depression in a surface, formed by an explosion or by the impact of a body, such as a meteorite. creator 1. Creator - terms referring to the Judeo-Christian God Almighty, Divine, God Almighty, Godhead, Lord, Maker, Jehovah Blessed Trinity, Holy Trinity, Sacred Trinity, Trinity - the union of the Father and Son and Holy Ghost in one Godhead hypostasis of Christ, hypostasis - any of the three persons of the Godhead constituting the Trinity especially the person of Christ in which divine and human natures are united

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    10. Re:Not green by TropicalCoder · · Score: 1

      Re: creators at the south pole

      your homework assignment crater (krtr) 1. A bowl-shaped depression at the top of a volcano or at the mouth of a geyser

      Who's to say there aren't any creators at the south pole of the moon, anyhow? Ever been there, wise guy? :-)

      (Geez - I never even noticed that one! I can't spell any more - and the spelling checking doesn't flag it when I use the wrong word.)

    11. Re:Not green by akuykenda · · Score: 1

      Good show.

      I looked it up and was about to correct you, but realized that I had been fooled.

      FWIW

      peculate: verb; embezzle or steal money

    12. Re:Not green by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Perculate: verb; to brew coffee.

      har har... I'll be here all week!

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  20. Smash a probe, been there, done that! by Wowsers · · Score: 1
    Smash a probe, NASA's done it before. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/686674.stm

    The disappearance of the Mars Polar Lander in December concluded a year of major failures for Nasa. The lander vanished less than three months after Nasa lost its sister spacecraft, the Mars Climate Orbiter, in highly-embarrassing circumstances. The $125m craft, which was to study the Red Planet's climate, went missing on 23 September after a mix-up between imperial and metric measurements
    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
    1. Re:Smash a probe, been there, done that! by mr100percent · · Score: 4, Informative

      You may laugh, but NASA did do it before. During the final Apollo missions, they allowed the (abandoned) lunar module to crash into the moon in order to test seismic readings on the instruments left behind.

    2. Re:Smash a probe, been there, done that! by mbone · · Score: 5, Informative

      They also smashed the third stage of the Saturn V into the Moon for every Apollo after 13 IIRC, also as seismic probes. That had
      considerably more kinetic energy than either the LEM upper stages or any of the recent impacts.

      It wasn't just to test the seismometers, it was to map the interior of the Moon, once they found out that the Moon is seismically pretty quiet and doesn't have much in the way of Moonquakes. It was thus a very large scale example of the seismic prospecting that is done frequently in oil exploration.

    3. Re:Smash a probe, been there, done that! by Walruzoar · · Score: 1

      The clangers http://www.clangers.co.uk/ ate that one, they will eat this one too...

      --
      Take off every 'Sig'!! You know what you doing. http://www.donline.co.uk/
    4. Re:Smash a probe, been there, done that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It was thus a very large scale example of the seismic prospecting that is done frequently in oil exploration.

      Hence explaining the funding source.

    5. Re:Smash a probe, been there, done that! by maotx · · Score: 1

      Yes, for surely the moon is rich with oil ...

      --
      I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
    6. Re:Smash a probe, been there, done that! by joeljkp · · Score: 3, Informative
      It's actually a relatively common thing to do.

      A short list of missions intended to impact the Moon:
      1. Luna 2
      2. Ranger 3
      3. Ranger 4
      4. Ranger 5
      5. Ranger 6
      6. Ranger 7
      7. Ranger 8
      8. Ranger 9


      A short list of missions with other goals, but were eventually intentionally impacted with the Moon:
      1. every lunar orbiter ever
      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
  21. It's a trap! by jared_earle · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'll get my coat.

    --
    -- Jared Earle | "There is no spork"
  22. NASA turns into drunken driver by k33l0r · · Score: 1

    So we've gone from landing on the moon to crashing into it? Truly the mark of progress...

  23. Poor moon by jgoemat · · Score: 1

    More notably, it will impact with significantly greater force (100x, per the article) than previous Moon collisions
    The moon cannot repel a force of that magnitude!
  24. In China by rucs_hack · · Score: 2, Funny

    Russian Spaceships Fly Yo....

    Oh wait, that's actually true..

  25. Hotblack Desiato is auditioning by duzbin · · Score: 1, Funny

    Are you sure this isn't an audition for Disaster Area.

    --
    "Let the commencement...beginulate!"
  26. they are just doing their job as they know .. by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    This will be very cheap research, they already had their extensive results of crashing stuff upon the moon.. ...so they'll hardly have to change any parameters for this mission!

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  27. Right... by rucs_hack · · Score: 5, Funny

    Which insensitive clod tagged this story Beagle3?

    This entire thread will be kept behind until whoever did it owns up...
    Come on, I can wait all day if necessary.

    1. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I'll bite. What's beagle3?

    2. Re:Right... by powerlord · · Score: 1

      The successor to Beagle 2 ;)

      "Beagle 2 was an unsuccessful British landing spacecraft that formed part of the European Space Agency's 2003 Mars Express mission. It is not known for certain that the lander reached the Martian surface; all contact with it was lost upon its separation from the Mars Express six days before its scheduled entry into the atmosphere. It may have missed Mars altogether, skipped off the atmosphere and entered an orbit around the sun, or burned up during its descent. If it reached the surface, it may have hit too hard or just simply failed to contact Earth due to a minor fault." (emphasis mine)

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  28. Excellent, more activity like this is needed by posys · · Score: 1
    --
    The Future is already here, just unevenly distributed... THE ROBOTIC WAGELESS ECONOMY NOW! http://RoboEco.com/slash
    1. Re:Excellent, more activity like this is needed by jrister · · Score: 1

      to get us to the goal... http://roboeco.com/Economia-Robotica-Sin-Salarios

      PSA REGARDING ABOVE LINK: Excessive use of bright colors on this webpage may cause seizures. Click at your own risk.

      --
      If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. --James Madison
    2. Re:Excellent, more activity like this is needed by posys · · Score: 1

      Love your tag line jrister, what did you think of the ROBOTIC WAGELESS ECONOMY sir ? The only thing that would make Madison's quote better would be to change the word "enemy" to "real or contrived 'enemy'" From your tagline, you may be interested in this site: http://teaminfinity.com/writings/TheCity.shtml Go for the GOAL !! ->> http://roboeco.com/Economia-Robotica-Sin-Salarios

      --
      The Future is already here, just unevenly distributed... THE ROBOTIC WAGELESS ECONOMY NOW! http://RoboEco.com/slash
    3. Re:Excellent, more activity like this is needed by jrister · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Check your email. Sent you some comments regarding your site.

      --
      If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. --James Madison
  29. Man in the Moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  30. Space 1999? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they hit the moon REALLY hard, they might knock the moon out of orbit and we'd have "Space 1999" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_1999

  31. If this was 1st of April by Bromskloss · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I would have thought it was a (slightly tasteless) joke. This guy "Admiral Ackbar" sounds an awful lot like "Allahu Akbar", which some people, I imagine, might be shouting as they crash flying machines in to things.

    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    1. Re:If this was 1st of April by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I seriously hope that's a really poorly-executed joke.

      After a few hundred "itsatrap" tags and you still don't know who Admiral Ackbar is?

  32. Details of delivery system leaked! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  33. cheese by ionix5891 · · Score: 0

    nobody told nasa that its made of cheese did they?

    1. Re:cheese by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wensleydale, I think.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:cheese by Kagura · · Score: 1

      [On their spaceship, about to leave Earth] Wallace: No crackers Gromit! We've forgotten the crackers!

  34. We have the technology by jcmoonraker · · Score: 1

    We have the technology, the time is now.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHpX5aa5Lz4

    1. Re:We have the technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank god you said it, I thought I was going to have to create an account to get people to reference SOMETHING other than Star Wars.

      And there's probably some stupid monkey somewhere asking why NASA's doing this. That stupid monkey is ruining my holiday.

  35. Damage Control? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    Well at least if NASA claim that they're going to smash it into the moon, and it actually lands, then they may just get some of their credibility back!

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  36. addendum by andy_t_roo · · Score: 1

    shouldn't the title read "NASA plans to *deliberately* crash a probe into the moon" ?

  37. It's a new Olympic sport! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first country to hit bull's eye on Tycho's crater wins the giant teddy bear!!!

  38. where have we heard that one before? by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    Metric vs. customary? Oh shit... -er, we meant to do that!

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  39. Don't knock experience... by Dareth · · Score: 1

    ... and the Mars engineers have some of the best experience in the world with smashing objects into objects in space.

    It may work better if they don't tell them it is supposed to crash into the moon, just have them plan another mission to Mars.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  40. So what happens... by raving+griff · · Score: 1

    ...when the moon blows up? On a serious note, do we really know what we are doing here? Whose to say that our bomardment won't release rock and dust from the moon into space, where it becomes a threat to satellites. Or perhaps we could hit some sort of undiscovered fissure, driving a spike into a crack. Either way, this has the potential to do more damage than good.

    1. Re:So what happens... by east+coast · · Score: 1

      The distance from the moon to the earth is so astronomical (no pun intended) that this is a fairly mild concern. The real problem arises when debris is in orbit, otherwise it's just another shooting star. Kicking rock out with such force that it makes it to earth makes it unlikely that it could maintain an orbit. These kinds of collisions have been going on for eons and we're still not surrounded with rocks from the moon. The difference is that this one is man made.

      And we know a ton about the moon's geography. The moon has no liquid core or even if it does there is no way that we're going to hit with enough force to cause a problem on the level of changing it's structure.

      Heck, if we had that kind of power available to us near-earth asteroids would be an easy problem to solve.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:So what happens... by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      I used to live near a mine where much, much more than a thousand tons of rock was blasted in one shot. That is miniscule compared to the moon's total mass. The moon is bigger than you think, maybe.

      The moon is also much farther away than you think, maybe, and its gravity is maybe stronger than you think. Maybe.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  41. Yeah?! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    Well, in Korea, only old people fly spaceships.

    Wait...why is it that I can see a spaceship, flying down the left lane at well below the speed limit with its left blinker on the whole way?

  42. Obligatory Revisited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The moon's poles can't repel firepower of that magnitude!

  43. I'D LIKE TO SEE... by sm62704 · · Score: 3, Funny

    TWO BRICKS BEING SMASHED TOGETHER!

    I'm sorry sir, but that's offtopic. Try Again, please.

    I'D LIKE TO SEE... A ROCKET SMASHING INTO THE MOON!

    That's more like it. And now for something completely different...

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  44. Re:That spaceship is heading for that small moon.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can you please just stfu? that meme is so stinking old and used so frequently that it's lost all of it's true meaning. talk about beating a dead horse.

  45. Is this what they call... by CarAnalogy · · Score: 1

    ...a moonshot?

  46. Earth-on-moon violence by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

    Can't we all just get along. Too soon, too soon

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
  47. Dr Banner Approves.... by LittleGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    One Small Step for Man,

    One Big *SMASH* for Hulk!

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  48. Oblig. West Wing Quotes by 787style · · Score: 3, Funny

    Toby Ziegler: They know it was on course traveling at a rate of 15,400 miles per hour, which it was supposed to. Somewhere during its descent it was also supposed to release two probes - each about the size of a basketball - firing them deep into the ground as part of the mission's search for evidence of water under surface.

    Josh Lyman: We think if we hit the ground hard enough, we can make it to the center of the planet and find water?

    Toby Ziegler: Yeah.

    Josh Lyman: That's not a theory of physics pretty much disproved by Wile E. Coyote?

  49. God Bless America by Tsoat · · Score: 1

    Nasa person number 1 "Hey I know the moon is kind of important for us but lets thrust stuff into it and see what happens" Everyone else "OK!"

  50. First a spacestation.. by Rynth · · Score: 1

    Now a moon, NASA's gone mad with power...

  51. Stop the Warmongers! by Eyeball97 · · Score: 1

    Bastards. It's all a cover story. They've declared war on The Clangers.

  52. Venus envy by smartfart · · Score: 1

    Is NASA so angry at not being able to visit for 30+ years that they're lashing out at their mistress now? Or is this just a game of interplanetary darts? NASA's so rusty at this game, the Chinese ought to watch out that their manned expedition isn't hit by mistake.

    Bah... NASA bores me. I'm looking forward to commercial lunar colonization, hopefully in the next decade.

  53. Pop-up Video--little known fact about ROTJ by Phoenix666 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lucas saved a ton of money on makeup costs by casting Tori Spelling to play Admiral Ackbar. It's a fact--look it up.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  54. Sure... by madmax79 · · Score: 1

    And they say that 40-odd years ago men stepped on the moon? Or was it Santa?

  55. Jump start the space race... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put $50bil of gold and valuable metals inside the rocket, and launch it to the moon. The first one to bring it back keeps it. That'll give private industry something to strive for!

    And yet despite this horrendous waste, it would still be the most efficient use of tax dollars in any space program, to date.

  56. C H A by Kynmore · · Score: 1

    Does Chairface Chippendale run NASA now?

  57. It's a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .... trap!

  58. Putting it another way by madmax79 · · Score: 1

    This is the same as planning a car crash because you still haven't learned how to drive... No darling, I wasnt reverse parking, I've been actually planning this accident for months....

  59. whatcouldpossiblygowrong by Goaway · · Score: 1

    All right then, Slashdot taggers, do tell us:

    What could possibly go wrong?

    What possible reason is there to use this crypto-Luddite tag?

  60. Hey Kids! by msheekhah · · Score: 1

    It's Admiral Akbar cereal!

    --
    Mark Anthony Collins
  61. why not just land there again? by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    oh wait!

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  62. Space warfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The moon men will probably try and shoot it down. You know, what with the full tanks of hydrazine and all.

  63. Time for the ObLiberalMyth by sconeu · · Score: 1
    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  64. They should be looking for Helium-3 by Stavr0 · · Score: 1

    It's really useful fuel for fusion reactors.

  65. After the Moon strike by Ranger · · Score: 1

    "My God! It's full of cheese!"

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  66. This does WHAT for me??? by No2Gates · · Score: 1

    Let's see... piss away a few BILLION dollars, or use it for something useful like research into something like breast cancer.
    Who cares about the moon anyhow, everyone likes boobies though.

    --
    Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
  67. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or the alternative:

    In Soviet Russia, moon launches spacecraft to smash into YOU!

  68. The Great Sorrow by ruewan · · Score: 1

    Didn't these people read Flash Gordon. The Great Sorrow will follow!!!! earth=mongol

  69. Calvin and Hobbes by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

    A small red spacecraft breaks through the cloud cover of Mysterio system planet 6! At the controls, it's none other than our fearless hero, Spaceman Spiff! Piloting over the lifeless world, he reflects on his unusual mission...

    QUIZ
    1. 6+5= ...to somehoe crash planets 6 and 5 together!

    In a scientific mission to discover what happens when two planets collide, Spaceman Spiff drops anchor! The anchor catches on a hillside! Spiff downshifts and guns the motor! Imperceptibly at first, the planet slowly moves, towed along by our hero, until... ...breaking orbit, planet 6 picks up speed, hurling towards planet 5!

    Pulled by Spaceman Spiff, planet 6 is about to collide with planet 5! With no time to lose, our hero cuts loose the anchor and flies to safety! The planets crash, grinding and shattering with awful force! Planet 5, being smaller, is crunched to dust! Only 6 remains!

    6+5=6.

    Of course taken from Bill Watterson. Sorry, Bill.

    -b

    --
    No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  70. What the? by bobmarleypeople · · Score: 1

    You're only supposed to blow the bloody crater up!

  71. Obligatory Mr. Show Reference by ubergrits · · Score: 2, Funny

    "On July 4th of this year, America will blow up the moon."

    "We have the technology; the time is now; science can wait no longer; children are our future. America can, should, must, and will blow up the moon."

    "Yes, and we'll be doing it during a full moon, so we make sure we get it all."

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=kHpX5aa5Lz4

  72. Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah....when the ESA did something like this the Americans were all up on their ass making retarded comments like "lolololo u cant brin skykrafft bak!!lolo" and now Nasa is doing it, no doubt everyone is going to be like "Yeah this is a great idea, God those guys at Nasa really are geniuses."

  73. heckuva job, NASA. but you did that with Mars. by swschrad · · Score: 1

    oops, I'm sorry, they didn't mean to.

    my bad.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  74. Come, now... by KewlioMZX · · Score: 1

    Just because NASA hasn't gotten into outer space yet doesn't mean they can take it out on the moon. It's not its fault...

    --
    Absolutely ridiculous. >.>
  75. What's the sky gonna look like with no moon? by MatchbooksAndSarcasm · · Score: 1
  76. It rings like a bell by rdawson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Too bad we turned off the Apollo ALSEP package, the seismometer experiments. I had the joy of working with the data team, and on one of the lunar missions they crashed the Apollo S4-B stage into the moon. The seismic event lasted for an hour. The moon is a homogeneous sphere, no core.

  77. Finally! Training for DEEP IMPACT / ARMAGEDDON! by tikal2k · · Score: 1

    The moon's easy enough for a first target, we'll get to Wolf-Biederman skill levels after a couple of years!