This is what actual evidence and analysis looks like. Unlike what was presented by the Intelligence Community. I'd like to see someone send a 2 gigabyte file archive from DC to Romania via VPN in 87 seconds, even today. Until I see proof that that's even possible, I'm going with Adam Carter.
Forensicator and Adam Carter have provided much stronger evidence and analysis that is was a leak from the inside and a coverup that tried to pin it on the Russians. Look here with an open mind>
WSJ reports that movie attendance has dropped by 5%, compared with the same period in 2016, and revenues are down, too, dipping just 2.9%, thanks to higher ticket prices making up for the lack of ticket sales.
If you raise prices and revenue decreases, it means that prices are too high. There's a simple fix to their problem.
These days, I don't think a degree from an Ivy League school is worth what it used to be. Unless maybe, you're a corporation like Google that values ideological conformity.
You don't trade in a tax credit for cash. You use a tax credit to negate someone the taxes you would have paid. If the plant wasn't built they wouldn't have paid taxes anyway. So no worse off. The article is just stupid.
Well, student loans also get used for things like textbooks. It's no surprise that when lots of "free" money is available for those things, their prices increase.
I'm smart enough to realize that the effect of data corrections should be more or less random. In the case of climate science it is nowhere near random.
You provided absolutely zero arguments in your fisking of the ops post. Just attacks. I'm inclined to believe op is correct, and you feel threatened that maybe the "consensus" isn't really as stong as you first thought.
Every time "scientists" tweak the temperature record, the rate changes. The past gets cooler, and the present gets warmer. They are not practicing science anymore, they are just manipulating data to reach a desired outcome.
Someone who criticizes an unproven hypothesis, or data integrity issues, or propietary data practices is not anti-science. If anything they are the opposite.
Slashdot Mirror
They did not hack it and yes they are accused of doing it. It's pretty conclusively an inside leak and a (inept) coverup blaming it on the Russians.
If you want to see analysis and evidence that comes pretty close to proof that it was an internal leak, look here.
Here is the analysis that that article is based on. Looks pretty legit.
Here is Adam Carter's Evidence>
This is what actual evidence and analysis looks like. Unlike what was presented by the Intelligence Community. I'd like to see someone send a 2 gigabyte file archive from DC to Romania via VPN in 87 seconds, even today. Until I see proof that that's even possible, I'm going with Adam Carter.
I don't know if it was Seth Rich, but it's pretty clear it was a leak from within the DNC. Evidence and Analysis>
Forensicator and Adam Carter have provided much stronger evidence and analysis that is was a leak from the inside and a coverup that tried to pin it on the Russians. Look here with an open mind>
In terms of the Earned Income Tax Credit it comes in the form of a tax refund even if you didn't pay any taxes.
WSJ reports that movie attendance has dropped by 5%, compared with the same period in 2016, and revenues are down, too, dipping just 2.9%, thanks to higher ticket prices making up for the lack of ticket sales.
If you raise prices and revenue decreases, it means that prices are too high. There's a simple fix to their problem.
These days, I don't think a degree from an Ivy League school is worth what it used to be. Unless maybe, you're a corporation like Google that values ideological conformity.
Clearly the op doesn't like brown people heading the FCC.
You don't trade in a tax credit for cash. You use a tax credit to negate someone the taxes you would have paid. If the plant wasn't built they wouldn't have paid taxes anyway. So no worse off. The article is just stupid.
You obviously didn't read his post.
You'd be surprised at the number.brr of automation companies in wisconsin.
Sure he was, he just happened to be your kind of deplorable piece of shit. And you're a racist.
My ad hominems?
Sure I could, but you'll just attack the source and ignore it.
Well, student loans also get used for things like textbooks. It's no surprise that when lots of "free" money is available for those things, their prices increase.
This is an excellent example of someone who is swayed by dogma rather than science.
I'm smart enough to realize that the effect of data corrections should be more or less random. In the case of climate science it is nowhere near random.
You provided absolutely zero arguments in your fisking of the ops post. Just attacks. I'm inclined to believe op is correct, and you feel threatened that maybe the "consensus" isn't really as stong as you first thought.
Every time "scientists" tweak the temperature record, the rate changes. The past gets cooler, and the present gets warmer. They are not practicing science anymore, they are just manipulating data to reach a desired outcome.
Someone who criticizes an unproven hypothesis, or data integrity issues, or propietary data practices is not anti-science. If anything they are the opposite.
Fortunately, when you burn the cracked components of water, you end up with...water.
College was affordable before we started heavily subsidizing it with taxpayer backed student loans.
In the same place place it would be in full sunlight, only it would be quite a bit less.