Slashdot Mirror


Hollywood's Bad Summer Movies Are Driving a Decline in Movie Ticket Sales (fastcompany.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: While some people may point at The Emoji Movie as the root of all that is wrong with Hollywood, The Wall Street Journal reports that the problem goes much deeper than a single misfire featuring Patrick Stewart as a poop emoji. WSJ reports that movie attendance has dropped by 5%, compared with the same period in 2016, and revenues are down, too, dipping just 2.9%, thanks to higher ticket prices making up for the lack of ticket sales. On Aug. 2, AMC shares dropped 27% in one day, the WSJ reports. While films like Beauty and the Beast, Wonder Woman, and Get Out fared well at the box office, they were the anomalies in a year full of box office disappointments. Instead of giving moviegoers more badass female leads and genre-bending horror films, Hollywood keeps throwing gobs of money at an unwanted fifth installment of Pirates of the Caribbean, more Transformers movies, and putting $175 million into King Arthur: Legend of the Sword, and then clutching their pearls in shock that no one wanted to see them.

245 comments

  1. Speaking just for me by geek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I simply can't divorce Hollywood from it's politics. I can't just go and enjoy a movie anymore. They insist on injecting their dogmas on to me. Before the movie I see nothing but politics from the actors, telling me how awful a person I am. During the movie it's an endless barrage of extremism masked as social justice.

    Making things worse, they want me to "enjoy" this in a shitty movie theater surrounded by loud people that can't put their cellphones away. All for the low low price of 15 bucks a person not including the 25 bucks in terrible food.

    Pretty rare these days too that a movie isn't a sequel or prequel or sidequel in some "franchise" that sucked from the start but brought in a lot of teenagers so the stiffs in suits thought it would make sense to throw billions of dollars at it.

    I jokingly said to my wife the other night that there wasn't even anything I wanted to pirate anymore, it's just gotten that bad.

    1. Re:Speaking just for me by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I simply can't divorce Hollywood from it's politics. I can't just go and enjoy a movie anymore.

      Translation: "I can't believe Star Wars cast a woman in a leading role and didn't show off her tiddies."

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Speaking just for me by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No one said you had to watch all the Transformer movies.

    3. Re:Speaking just for me by 110010001000 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      100% correct. More "conservative" snowflakes complaining about "liberals". How novel.

    4. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Maybe it's the media outlets you pay attention to. I hardly ever see anything like that. The only thing I"ve heard in the last 6 months was actress saying something about football ....

      I don't know, maybe I'm an outlier and don't consider their personal opinions to be important enough to warrant my attention.

      Of course, I keep seeing these comments about "leftist" Hollywood but don't say anything about Clint Eastwood, Adam Baldwin and a few other Hollywood folks who are quite conservative and are die-hard Republican supporters. And let us not forget Charlton Heston (RIP).

      The "leftists" in Hollywood are just the loud ones.

    5. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I simply can't divorce Hollywood from it's politics"

      Can you divorce that possessive pronoun from its extra apostrophe? It's means it is.

      " I can't just go and enjoy a movie anymore. They insist on injecting their dogmas on to me. "

      You're old,

      "Before the movie I see nothing but politics from the actors, telling me how awful a person I am."

      and paranoid

      "During the movie it's an endless barrage of extremism masked as social justice."

      and mentally ill.

      There's no people in the walls watching you, OK?

    6. Re:Speaking just for me by murdocj · · Score: 1

      Weird. What horrible politics and dogma are you running into?

      I agree that seeing X-Men episode 27 or Star Wars prequel 12 doesn't do it for me.

    7. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I simply can't divorce Hollywood from it's politics. I can't just go and enjoy a movie anymore.

      Translation: "I can't believe Star Wars cast a woman in a leading role and didn't show off her tiddies."

      That's not what I got out of his comment at all.

      Politics don't mean two sides.

      I totally agree with him. I hate the agenda in Hollywood. It changes all of the time.

    8. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a good start.

    9. Re:Speaking just for me by geek · · Score: 1, Troll

      Weird. What horrible politics and dogma are you running into?

      I agree that seeing X-Men episode 27 or Star Wars prequel 12 doesn't do it for me.

      Its not even that the politics and dogmatic crap is there. Its that its there in EVERY SINGLE MOVIE and is so blatant that its laughable. Not really interested in the specifics, it's just a general hatred for overt agendas in movies. Shit I grew up in CA, 90% of my friends are Democrats/Liberals. I have no issue with that, it's the extremism and onesidedness that irks me. The echo chamber is breathtaking.4

    10. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      telling me how awful a person I am

      Maybe that's because you ARE an awful person.

      Aren't you conservatives always telling liberal "snowflakes" to suck it up, grow a pair, and learn to take criticism instead of crying and whining about it ?

      Well, eat your own dog food, little butthurt conservative snowflake.

    11. Re:Speaking just for me by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      You misspelled 'breasts'.

      There are lots of decent movies with female leads who didn't bare breasts or butts. You just need to get out more.

      I want to be entertained by a movie, not preached to. If I want preaching, I'll listen to a preacher or watch MSNBC.

    12. Re:Speaking just for me by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the unrealistically scrawny and weak female lead carrying a black dongstaff riding a speeder that looks like a dildo with the young black buck love interest adventure in their fight against the evil straight white man and being followed around by a small white cuck-bot the white male viewer is supposed to identify as while the hispanic fighter ace saves the day after being commanded to go in by the asian general and the only guy that dies is also a white male. convenient.

      You watched Star Wars and that's what you came away with?

      You might have bigger problems than the SJWs, my friend.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    13. Re: Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why ? because he doesn't support your regressive conservative women-in-the-kitchen-and-the-bedroom agenda ?

    14. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You might have bigger problems than the SJWs, my friend.

      Yes, like a lack of titties in movies.

    15. Re:Speaking just for me by Boronx · · Score: 1, Informative

      Slashdot is about 75% conservative whining. Are you new?

    16. Re:Speaking just for me by x0ra · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let's be honest, the only reason of Carry Fisher's success was the bikini scene RofJ, not the depth of the Princess Leia.

    17. Re:Speaking just for me by x0ra · · Score: 2

      which balance out the 95% SJW on HN.

    18. Re:Speaking just for me by sexconker · · Score: 2

      You do have to watch Transformers - The Movie, however.
      It's the only good one and it came out 30 years ago.

      It's got an incredible voice cast, from an era when no established actor would touch an animated film with a 10 foot clown pole.
      Not only do you get the iconic Peter Cullen and Frank Welker, you also get the likes of Casey Kasem, Eric Idle, Judd Nelson, Leonard Nimoy, and Robert Stack. You even get Scatman Crothers and one of the final performances from Orson Welles.

      Then you've got the sound track that was so amazing the entire movie was story boarded to it. You even get a song from Weird Al Yankovic.

    19. Re:Speaking just for me by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It's means it is.

      It's been nice proving you wrong!

    20. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody is telling you anything.

      Consider that, perhaps you actually are a piece of shit.

      But, enough with your limp wrested white identity politics and far-right virtue signaling. Lets get to the point:

      Trump is a fucking loser, and so are you.

    21. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snowflakes complaining about snowflakes complaining. How novel.

    22. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your "refutation" is an ad hominum attack while arguing none of their points? Interesting.

      How does it feel to be so out of ideas you end up revealing your bigotry by insulting the age, gender, and (assumed by you) mental status of the prior poster?

      Does it suck to be so wrong you have to rely on a typo to "disprove" them?

    23. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I can't just go and enjoy a movie anymore. They insist on injecting their dogmas on to me. "

      Hollywood has been doing right/left wing propaganda since the day they were born. Did you somehow forget all the films make between the 50s up until the 1970s extolling the virtues of the american military as a force for the betterment of mankind ? All the while bombing the shit out of some poor asian country ?
      We had 2 or 3 decades of "innovation" followed by another 2 decades of "american exceptionalism bullshittism".

    24. Re: Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's does mean it is.

      It's it's that means it has.

    25. Re:Speaking just for me by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      I can't even tell if there's a mention of SWM Harrison Ford risking his life and dying in that comment.

      There's a lot of coded acronyms I don't know, and I probably should because I'm a SWM that didn't notice only SWM were dying. There was an entire planet that died and I'm sure not everyone in plastic was a SWM.

      This is confusing.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    26. Re:Speaking just for me by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Which star wars movie, the crappy Jar Jar Abrams shit story fest or Rogue One which I regret not seeing at the Cinema because I was expecting another Jar Jar shitfest (the only thing wrong with rogue one was the ending, I like to see the good gals and guys live happily ever after). You know what is easy to pick what comes out of hollywood, the nepotistic shit fests and content produced by actually creative people, who earned their positions.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    27. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hadn't watched a hollywood movie in close to a decade, but saw a featured torrent for Logan on rarbg and figured what the hell. Turned out to be literally "Old-ass Wolverine saves the adorable little illegal alien girl who was smuggled into America by her mother from the big bad ICE stand-ins (the leader of whom was named 'Donald', natch)".

      I think I'll give it another 10 years before I try again.

    28. Re: Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Funny how standing up for your religious convictions is only bigoted when Christians do it. For everyone else it's "fighting back against hate speech" or some bullshit.

      Oh, and a large chunk of republicans - including Trump - support gay marriage these days. Until it became politically expedient neither Obama nor Hillary did.

    29. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate the agenda in Hollywood. It changes all of the time.

      Pretty sure the agenda will be locked on "REEEEEE FUCK TRUMP!!" for the foreseeable future.

    30. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      <pet peeve>

      This is not even an ad-hominem, it's simply a childish insult.

      Insult: You fuck goats.
      Ad Hominem: Your argument is wrong because you fuck goats.

      </pet peeve>

    31. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      X-Men episode 27

      You seriously saw no political agenda in Logan? The movie where the entire plot is about a mexican illegal alien family being hunted down by a group of cruel agents led by a guy named Donald?

    32. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, Scatman

    33. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >be implicitly criticized by a leaked essay posted on an internal google message board by an employee who was immediately fired and unperson-ed for his thoughtcrime
      >lose your shit across every corner of the media and the internet for days, mostly unchallenged by anyone who might disagree because they're afraid you'll target them and get them fired also.

      >be overtly insulted and shamed by nearly the entire american entertainment and media complex (and a majority of the political establishment) for years as backwards and uneducated and every -ist and -phobic they can think of
      >make a snarky post on /. once in a while and immediately get met with even more insults

      Totally the same.

    34. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I simply can't divorce Hollywood from it's politics. I can't just go and enjoy a movie anymore.

      Translation: "I can't believe Star Wars cast a woman in a leading role and didn't show off her tiddies."

      Lack of women showing their titties is not what bothers me. What bothers me is their asses. With a couple of exceptions, all the women stars have butts like 14 year old boys now.
      But it seems impossible to me that all those people in Hollywood just want to look at the butts of 14 year old boys. Is there any explanation for that?

    35. Re:Speaking just for me by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      It's the only good one and it came out 30 years ago.

      When everyone else was watching Transformers in the 1980's, I was watching Captain Harlock, Robotech and Starblazers,

    36. Re:Speaking just for me by mjwx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I simply can't divorce Hollywood from it's politics. I can't just go and enjoy a movie anymore. They insist on injecting their dogmas on to me

      That's your problem, I suggest seeing a therapist about these kinds of paranoid delusions. Your white privilege is as safe as it ever was. Hollywood only has one dogma, that is to make money. The problem Hollywood has is that movies are no longer the only game in town. I'm not just talking about TV and Netflix, video games are now a significant form of entertainment amongst most people. Hollywood for so many decades never had any competition, they were able to keep a stranglehold on the production and distribution of the majority of entertainment, the internet has largely ruined this for them with games and streaming services taking over the production and piracy dealing with the distribution. Hollywood has simply not changed with new technologies. They're still stuck in the 80's when we had no other choice but to buy their crap (and I remember the 80's... they made some shit movies).

      I jokingly said to my wife the other night that there wasn't even anything I wanted to pirate anymore, it's just gotten that bad.

      Could she hear you from the kitchen, or was this when you put her shoes back in the drawer.

      Your problem isn't the imaginary "dogmas", your problem is they aren't pandering to you, ironically its because you're even further behind the times than Hollywood.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    37. Re:Speaking just for me by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Carrie Fisher's success was due to the original Star Wars. The bikini scenes were unfunny jokes, and C.F. was not all that pleasant to look at. There were a number of actresses who could have done much better in the Leia role, such as Sybil Danning and Sandahl Bergman.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    38. Re:Speaking just for me by quantaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let's be honest, the only reason of Carry Fisher's success was the bikini scene RofJ, not the depth of the Princess Leia.

      So was Mark Hamill's success a result of his brilliant acting or did he have a shirtless scene I forgot about?

      Let's be honest, Carry Fisher and Mark Hamill were both decent performers who achieved fame beyond their talent because they were well cast in a massively successful movie.

      To insist that Carry Fisher's success was only because of her bikini scene is the definition of sexism.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    39. Re: Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why ? because he doesn't support your regressive conservative women-in-the-kitchen-and-the-bedroom agenda ?

      That sure beats having your women chained up in the basement, which is the only way millennials can get a woman...

    40. Re:Speaking just for me by antdude · · Score: 1

      Don't eat in theaters and go during morning hours. That is how I save money and avoid the crowds. :)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    41. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: "I liked the emoji movie and thought it was witty"

      They has screwed the pooch this year. Usually by this time I have a list of 15-20 movies to buy fairly soon. I have maybe 4-5 'maybe if it was on sale' movies. This year is a dud. Dont think so? Dark Tower shaping up to be a dud. Mummy, dud. Pirates, dud. Ghost in the Shell, dud, Valerian, dud. Resident Evil, meh. Cars3, dud. Death wish is a maybe, wonder woman is a yes, guardians is a maybe. Blade runner is a maybe. Star wars will be a probable yes.

      Dud year.

    42. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Trump is a fucking loser, and so are you.

      So... that's your point on how this person is "wrong?"

      You throw a bunch of insults and drag a politician into this?

      Is that all the left has for arguments? "Trump is bad because Trump?"

      You would do well to examine things on a level far more deep than CNN, and from a variety of sources on the political spectrum. At least then, if you still agree with your current viewpoints, you'll provide something more insightful than someone being wrong because you can insult them and because Trump simply exists.

    43. Re:Speaking just for me by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      The "leftists" in Hollywood are just the loud ones.

      That's pretty much what he said.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    44. Re: Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to a better theatre. Seriously, for 15 bucks you should be able to find a theatre with great sound, a nice screen and seats, and a respectful audience.

    45. Re:Speaking just for me by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      There was a lot more wrong with Rogue One than the ending.

      1. The intro was way too goddamned long and would have been screentime spent much better elsewhere.

      2. The whole mindbreaking alien bit should have been scrapped altogether and the pilot just made either a coward or someone with massive amounts of PTSD, or it should have been properly fleshed out and the pilot been truly crazy.

      3. The one Vader joke was way too goddamned forced and OOC.

      4. The romance subplot was pathetic.

      5. The ending scene on the planet was way too long and drawn out, primarily because they wanted to extend the idiotic romance subplot.

      6. Leia's ship being at the battle made no sense since there would have been sensor readings of her ship there which would have removed entirely any pretense of her ship being a diplomatic one. Canon would dictate by necessity that her ship not be there and instead gets handed the intel by another ship fleeing the battle in a rendezvous system.

      All that said, it was still a pretty good movie. Arguably better than TFA.

    46. Re:Speaking just for me by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Don't get me started on The Dark Tower. First of all, PG-13? Sorry, but Steven King movies don't work at PG-13. Secondly, Christopher Heyerdhal would have been VASTLY superior to Matthew McConaughey at his best as The Man in Black. The performance that the neophyte director got out of him was decidedly not his best and whoever did character design needs to be shot. There's a reason Hollywood has makeup artists and he should have been much more disturbing to look at. It would have needed to be over two, two and a half hours to even begin to properly flesh out. Jackie Earle Haley was criminally underutilized. The kid's friend literally had no reason to be in the film. All in all The Dark Tower ended up being a disappointing shitshow.

    47. Re:Speaking just for me by Jiro · · Score: 1

      Technically, Logan would be considered a parent of Laura so she would have American citizenship (or Canadian if Logan never got American citizenship).

    48. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, but they have awards just for edging! That seems progressive!

    49. Re:Speaking just for me by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Here's a thought - find a cinema that *doesn't* show all-hollywood stuff. There's plenty of thoughtful films coming from europe and asia - plenty of trash, too, but you can always try reading some online reviews to determine whether you're going to see something clever and funny from france or italy or S.korea, or another ear-piercing bollywood musical rom-com.

      Apropos of the discussion - what's *your* idea of an entertaining film? Do you like drama, comedy, thrillers, "true stories", romance, noir, sci-fi, what? Do you just want to go to a cinema and be entertained with eye-and-ear-candy (quite a valid reason to go, cinema is a way of forgetting your worldly woes for a while), or do you want something more challenging, a film that gives you something to think about after you've left the cinema?

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    50. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Mark Hamill's success

      LoL, wot?

      His "success" is bit parts in Star Wars fanfic.

    51. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's be honest, Carry Fisher and Mark Hamill were both decent performers who achieved fame beyond their talent because they were well cast in a massively successful movie.

      Can we have something made by team Irvin Kershner + Leigh Brackett + Lawrence Kasdan . It is so rare to start movie (The Empire Strikes Back) with solid defeat and then situation gets more complicated ...

      I am wondering what is Randall Wallace doing this year.
      Braveheart, Main in the Iron Mask, Pearl Harbor, We Were Soldiers ... that is pretty good trend.

    52. Re:Speaking just for me by oic0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When you politicize your content, you alienate half the population no matter which direction you lean. Nothing new there. Hollywood seems to have forgotten this because they think California is the world.

    53. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Umm...What?

      It sucked because it was just a rewrite of the original film. Tacking on some lame elements didn't help either.

    54. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa. Not sure if you've heard this before, but sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

    55. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: "I can't believe Star Wars cast a woman in a leading role and didn't show off her tiddies."

      Seriously? You really think that? Grow up.

    56. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yea, any criticism of the constant political bullshit shoved down our throats is immediately sexism, racism and whatever other -ism is popular that day.

    57. Re: Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Islamic countries being gay is punishable by death and gets you thrown off a building

      Some Islamic countries, you mean. Actually, just areas controlled by ISIS.

    58. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it *IS* a big departure from the 1977 version of "The good guys are white, and the black guy is bad".

    59. Re:Speaking just for me by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Watch any one of them. It *FEELS* like watching all of them.

    60. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Could she hear you from the kitchen, or was this when you put her shoes back in the drawer.

      And that sort of attitude is why hardly anyone takes your kind seriously.

    61. Re: Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If Hollywood pushed that agenda I'd complain about that as well. They don't so I don't, but escapist entertainment is not where I want to go to have ANY political agenda shoved on me. Just tell me a good story.

    62. Re:Speaking just for me by ayesnymous · · Score: 1
      > not including the 25 bucks in terrible food.

      That's why this country is so overweight, people can't stop eating for just 2 hours.

    63. Re:Speaking just for me by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      When you politicize your content, you alienate half the population no matter which direction you lean. Nothing new there. Hollywood seems to have forgotten this because they think California is the world.

      The only people politicizing content are the insufferable dummy spitters who flip out everytime they put a woman or a black guy in a film

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    64. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what did you really expect from a 1.5 hr film covering EIGHT novels?
      I will now have to try an find the series to read as I never had heard of it.

      Could the movie have been better-Absolutely but if you didnt have prior knowledge of the books it was decent film for a summer matiene which is how I saw it at the budget location of a chain in my city so to not pay 7-12 for a ticket I didnt get the reclining seat or table service. I kind of enjoyed it wasnt all CGI like most summer films.

    65. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: "You disagree with MAH FEELS and must be destroyed. And, I'm five."
                  Leia Organa, and Padme. Both strong female characters. No nudes. Next time, do your own research.

    66. Re:Speaking just for me by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Leia Organa, and Padme. Both strong female characters. No nudes. Next time, do your own research.

      Both Leia and Padme show copious cleavage, which is tiddy enough for incel MRAs.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    67. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comment was about 3/4 good. Too bad you completely screwed the pooch with your first paragraph. Once you had poisoned the well with that one I barely even heard the rest of your comment.

      If you are insufficiently mature to know your own mind then maybe you are vulnerable to "injecting their dogmas on to me." The rest of us have brains and use them.

    68. Re: Speaking just for me by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Star Wars was a shit movie. Devoid of any artistic merit, marketed very well.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    69. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mark Hammill's success is a result of his being mediocre after Star Wars, and ending up as a one-off villain in the 1990's Flash live action series. His voice was discovered, and he has been myriad heroes and villains in cartoons ever since.

    70. Re: Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Wars was a shit movie. Devoid of any artistic merit, marketed very well.

      I was not however devoid of entertainment value, hence its success.

    71. Re: Speaking just for me by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      More importantly, there's good movies where the lead female does show her breasts.

    72. Re: Speaking just for me by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      I feel bad for you if you think that's copious amounts of cleavage.

    73. Re: Speaking just for me by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Fuck you.

    74. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't piracy that's hurting Hollywood, it's the fact they haven't had a good idea in years. Stop whining and stop making preachy crap with a shitty plot.

    75. Re:Speaking just for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there's anything getting "shoved down your throats", maybe it is time to review the company you keep.

      I'm assuming you don't like things "shoved down your throats". Or you could learn to go with the flow and enjoy it?

      Really, is there anything more tiresome than a Rightie complaining about a 100% optional activity? Oh, that would be a Rightie suggesting that their character flaws "aren't really" the -ism that accurately describes those character flaws.

  2. Sequels and remakes by hambone142 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I couldn't believe they did another "Flatliners".

    When we watched the previews a few weeks ago we saw this as well as 4 (yes, FOUR) remakes of previous movies.

    Hollywood deserves to go broke if this is all they can come up with.

    If I see another comic book movie, I'm gonna puke.

    1. Re:Sequels and remakes by grumling · · Score: 2

      It's a side effect of all the studios being publicly held companies. They become completely risk adverse to anything that doesn't look like what worked the last time. Restaurants, retail shops, banks, airlines are all selling the same product in the same way because "the shareholders" (mostly institutional investors, the only ones who get an audience with the CEO) don't know anything about the business, other than what company X's earnings statement looked like last quarter, and so if you want the fund manager to buy your stock you'd better do what he wants. And once they own enough stock to move the chart negatively they get to define the product too. Usually the product is "do what that other, more successful company does, but for a buck cheaper. Or we'll run you out of the executive suite faster than you can say Transformers IX."

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    2. Re:Sequels and remakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of previews, there are too many advertisements and movie previews before a movie starts. You end up wasting at least a half hour on that. But if you don't get to the theater early enough you don't get a good seat so it's pretty much forced. Plus the high cost of movie snacks and drinks. I can stay home and rent a movie online for a fraction of the price and even pause it to take a piss if I want.

    3. Re:Sequels and remakes by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      If you want to get the whole picture, you need to pay attention to how it does in international sales. Pirates of the Caribbean made $$173 million in the US, but it made $781 million worldwide. Which market do you think they are going to pay the most attention to? The US is just one small market now.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Sequels and remakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US is just one small market now.

      I wouldn't call it small. Remember that the rest of those $781 million also can be divided up in different regions.
      Sure, the US isn't the largest market but it is still a large part.

  3. Nothing new under the sun by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

    We're just getting way past the saturation point with entertainment and stories of every kind. We need a break, and then afterward we can go back to telling and hearing the same old tales again, just as our ancestors have done for millennia. Maybe we could even do something useful for a while. I have even been thinking about cutting the cord on my Netflix subscription... ...and I'm not any kind of anti-TV nutter.

    --
    Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    1. Re:Nothing new under the sun by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We're just getting way past the saturation point with entertainment and stories of every kind. We need a break, and then afterward we can go back to telling and hearing the same old tales again, just as our ancestors have done for millennia. Maybe we could even do something useful for a while. I have even been thinking about cutting the cord on my Netflix subscription... ...and I'm not any kind of anti-TV nutter.

      When did our ancestors take a "break" from telling stories?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Nothing new under the sun by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Absolutely disagree. There are lots of great scripts out there, but Hollywood is run by accountants now. The reason they keep recycling old hits is because they think there's a baked in market. There's a baked in comic movie fanbase who'll go watch any shitstorm Marvel churns out regardless of the ratings, they'll tell us how great it was until the slow realization that it sucked sinks in right aroudn the time the next promo starts airing.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    3. Re:Nothing new under the sun by Lije+Baley · · Score: 2

      Sorry, I did not intend to say they did. We need the break, because of our modern luxuries and capabilities which allow us to overload ourselves with media. Our ancestors were naturally limited by lack of time and technology for such things. Though at times (e.g. Roman), they may have come close.

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    4. Re:Nothing new under the sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are only 7 basic stories everything else is just characters and setting

    5. Re:Nothing new under the sun by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

      Yes, there are tons of great scripts, and if you look at the television and streaming landscapes, plenty of them are already there. I'm not making the "lack of quality" argument, I'm saying that with the fragmentation and proliferation that's been happening, we basically want for nothing. And if you think your particular fringe taste is not being met, you only need to look closer, or wait a few months. I have heard some commentators call it another "Golden Age". But nothing out there expands my mind like it used to, and I'm tired, for now, of what seems like the same old stuff even in my fringe tastes. And I'm not interested in "novelty at any price" -- as seen in dystopian stories of snuff films becoming mainstream, for example.

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    6. Re:Nothing new under the sun by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I did not intend to say they did. We need the break, because of our modern luxuries and capabilities which allow us to overload ourselves with media. Our ancestors were naturally limited by lack of time and technology for such things.

      I don't know. Maybe you're right.

      I'm thinking about how for tens of thousands of years our ancestors would spend their evenings with nothing to do but look up at the stars. They told thousands upon thousands of stories just based on those little lights in the sky. They watched the sun come up every morning, and it was a story. They watched the sun's trajectory across the sky change over the months and it was...more stories. Stories upon stories. And when they started writing down stuff, it was even more stories. Stories about ancestors, about hunting, about having sex, about gods. Stories based on earlier stories, with the names changed.

      Maybe the number of stories hasn't changed. Maybe what's changed is our willingness to tell stories to each other instead of having some centralized industry stuff them down the funnel into our throats.

      Me? I like stories. Like to tell 'em, like to listen to 'em.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Nothing new under the sun by xevioso · · Score: 1

      Except that the vast majority of recent comic book properties, especially those by Marvel, have fared very well with both critics and viewers when taking into account ratings. It turns out that on average, "tentpole" movies that have good ratings do very well. Movies like Transformers do initially well, and then plummet, for one simple reason...they suck.

    8. Re:Nothing new under the sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're just getting way past the saturation point with entertainment and stories of every kind.

      Interestingly, more people think like you. In fact it maybe the next big discussion topic. A creeping malaise that is finally showing its colors. Every market, every industry, is saturated, with no more room to growth. Maybe it's really 'Peak Everything'.

    9. Re:Nothing new under the sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, we will never run out of novel stories to tell, at least until every aspect of human existence has been quantified and catalogued. With movies, you pay before you see it; so when the goal is money over expression, marketing plays the most important role. It is just business people, greedy people, and idiots lusting for fame making movies, so it's crap. And it isn't even objectively crap really. People still pay to see it. Most of these blockbusters still do well, so there is no reason to change the formula. There is no real solution as far as mainstream stuff goes. Scrap the whole planet and start over would probably be the most reasonable thing to do.

  4. Not all movies by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 3, Informative

    Emoji Movie may be all that's wrong with Hollywood, but Baby Driver and Dunkirk are what is right with it.

    1. Re:Not all movies by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The problem I had with Dunkirk, especially with buildup in the earlier trailers, I was expecting an English monster movie. I lost interest when it became clear that it was just another war movie.

    2. Re:Not all movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...are you fucking stupid?

    3. Re:Not all movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the constant rise in popularity of barbarian ideologies like right-wing extremism, facism, anti-intellectualism, xenophobia, etc, maybe people still haven't seen enough war movies.

    4. Re:Not all movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe they need to be shown what literal nazis and fascists were like. To point: the jews weren't rounded up and had their feelings hurt.

    5. Re:Not all movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      For crying out loud, are all you conservatives uneducated twats ?

      The nazis were facists, allied with Mussolini's facists, and facism is RIGHT-WING extremism, not LEFT-WING !

      No wonder you morons voted for Trump.

    6. Re: Not all movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, dangerous right-wing ideologies such as Sunni Islam are becoming more prominent.

    7. Re:Not all movies by Boronx · · Score: 1

      For years literal Nazis didn't round up people and slaughter them en mass. What they did first was destroy the young system of democracy and any kind of factual public discourse. And of course, they did demonize the Jews, prepping society for what was to come.

    8. Re:Not all movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, creimer, I, for one, actually believe that you're this ignorant.

    9. Re:Not all movies by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      ...are you fucking stupid?

      I guess you're not a fan of Japanese kaiju movies, where suspense is built up by not revealing the monster until the very last possible moment. The most famous example, of course, was Gojira (Godzilla). For the American Godzilla (2014), the bad monsters were shown early but Godzilla wasn't fully revealed until last one-third of the movie. Cloverfield was an epic disappointment when they revealed the monster. The early Dunkirk trailers had the promise of being an epic monster movie.

    10. Re:Not all movies by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      <sarcasm> Thanks for preserving the lie. <\sarcasm>

      Big, intrusive government is left wing. There is no fundamental difference between fascism and communism, they are both based on denying individual rights.

      Small government, government which respects individual rights, is right wing.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    11. Re:Not all movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Small government, government which respects individual rights, is right wing.

      No, that's Libertarianism.

    12. Re:Not all movies by dunkelfalke · · Score: 0

      Your comments are, as always, the perfect example of conservatives being generally less educated and you have generally no idea, what left and right wings are, what communism and fascism is, calling everything you don't like "left wing", and everything you like "right wing".

      About the first thing Hitler did was to imprison all communists and social democrats. There is a huge fundamental difference between communism and fascism, fascism is an idealist worldview considering the culture an expression of a race's collective soul. This is why fascists consider - and this is so very typical for conservatives in general - communism and socialism, both materialist ideologies, being a cause of western society's decay.

      The sad part of it all is that people like you refuse to get educated and not just proudly wave around their stupidity and lack of knowledge like the flag of their country, but happily swear allegiance to these less than desirable properties. Sometimes I wish people like you would just found their own country - Stupidia - and leave.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    13. Re:Not all movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a thick fucker.

      Hitler also decried the notion of income unearned by work, pooled money into generalized infrastructure projects, and co-opted the nation's industrial machinery into supporting the non-economic aims of the state.

      The main difference was in the targets of division that they used to seize and retain power.

      SJWs have learnt from both, and now use a multitude of categories to dynamically divide any group at all, at whim.

    14. Re: Not all movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you just listed all the traits of the left.

    15. Re: Not all movies by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Yeah, our history books in school totally left out the Japanese monster of a famous WW2 story. What has our education system come to?

  5. Remember Creativity? by Zorro · · Score: 1

    Neither does Hollywood. But there will be a Pirates 6!

  6. Small wonder by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    " WSJ reports that movie attendance has dropped by 5%, "

    If I want to see teenies checking their smartphone I just take a look on the sidewalk, no need to go to a movie theater.

  7. Public Service Announcement by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Baby Driver is good.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Public Service Announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumbass name, though.

    2. Re:Public Service Announcement by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      One guy called Baby Driver "a soundtrack with a movie attached". A bit harsh, but it's another one of those things wrong with movies. Several movies (most notably Guardians of the Galaxy 1 & 2) did well by adding a nice feelgood soundtrack to it; it works in that kind of movie. However in Baby Driver this felt rather contrived, using a lame plot device to shoehorn that soundtrack in there.

      But the year so far has seen a rather poor harvest of movies. Dunkirk was pretty decent. But they even managed to screw up the Alien franchise.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:Public Service Announcement by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You think they just now screwed up the Alien franchise?

      There was one good alien movie, one OK, the rest just suck big wet acid dripping alien balls.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Public Service Announcement by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      One guy called Baby Driver "a soundtrack with a movie attached".

      I don't have a problem with that, actually. But I can see how some people might.

      It's like the guy who complained about the entire Mad Max franchise just being made of movies that were "one long car chase". For me, that's exactly what made them compelling. It was cinema boiled down to its essence: moving light projected on a screen with sound. Pure action. Very existential.

      Dunkirk wasn't bad, but I found it a little manipulative, like a Spielberg movie, where the audience is given cues regarding what to feel and when, and they're hammered over your head. It was skillfully made, though.

      I saw Baby Driver a few weeks ago when I was in Chicago at the famous Logan Theater, which is a half-price, second run restored Beaux Arts movie palace on Chicago's Northwest side (that serves drinks!) It was a fun experience. Not a life-changing Oscar-worthy experience, but a good summer flick.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Public Service Announcement by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Two.

    6. Re:Public Service Announcement by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      One _really_ good one. One that was OK. I might like 'Aliens', it it wasn't for 'Alien' setting such a high bar. Should have left it alone. But Hollywood...

      The ones I feel for are the kids that see 'Alien' last, or any other order than first. 'Alien' after 'Alien vs Predator XXXIV'? They don't even show you the alien until 2/3 of the movie is gone, just ruint.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:Public Service Announcement by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Two really good ones if you include the director's cut of Aliens.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    8. Re:Public Service Announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are going to include director's cut you might as well include the 2003 Alien 3 Assembly cut.
      Watched it recently and I think I might move it up to being the second best Alien movie.

      Aliens is still damn good, but at heart it is an action movie. A bunch of cocky soldiers goes on a mission and gets their ass handed to them. It is more or less interchangeable with The Predator.
      Heck, place it in a jungle and change the aliens to Asians and you have your basic Vietnam movie.

      Alien 3 brings in a bit of that tension that the first movie had and the assembly cut fixes a few issues.
      I still think Aliens is great, but it isn't really in the same genre as the other two.

      Alien 4 on the other hand deserves all the hate that Alien 3 unjustly got.

    9. Re:Public Service Announcement by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      A good cut of Alien 3? How long is it? 30 seconds?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  8. Re:Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think anyone is staying away from the Emoji movie because of an evil leftist agenda. They're staying away because it sucks, and because streaming services like Netflix and Amazon can provide better entertainment at a lot better price.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  9. but bad movies won't get the blame by arbiter1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hollywood will blame Piracy as reason for weak ticket sales and why we need more tougher law's.

    1. Re:but bad movies won't get the blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hollywood will blame Piracy as reason for weak ticket sales and why we need more tougher law's.

      I wonder if Hollywood is intentionally releasing crappy movies specifically for this purpose.

    2. Re:but bad movies won't get the blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should be tougher laws against random use of the apostrophe in the word laws

  10. Too Many White Males by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are still too many white males in prominent roles in movies. Movie revenue will increase once all white males are cast in unimportant or comedy relief roles then phased out entirely. Hollywood must boycott white males if they want to succeed.

    1. Re:Too Many White Males by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They tried that with the Ghostbusters reboot and it failed. As expected.

    2. Re:Too Many White Males by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They tried that with the Ghostbusters reboot and it failed. As expected.

      Being a reboot where all they did was flip the genders around is the main reason why I not didn't see it but why I also wanted that travesty to fail. Had it been a sequel featuring the daughters of the original Ghostbusters I could have gotten behind it but a remake where they're all just women and where they casted a bunch of unfunny ones at that was just a disaster waiting to happen.

    3. Re:Too Many White Males by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, white males should only be casted in movies like this

    4. Re:Too Many White Males by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #Woke

      I'd love to see more Jews in films, tired of these white bois.

    5. Re:Too Many White Males by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      They didn't just flip the genders around. They also made their motivations entirely different, made the secondary characters utterly irrelevant, and turned it into an action/slapstick comedy instead of horror/comedy.

    6. Re:Too Many White Males by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jews are white. They have no POC oppression cred. Got to be at least muslim or black, preferably both.

    7. Re:Too Many White Males by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The correct phase is "Jews are not Diverse".

      See that it doesn't happen again, bigot.

    8. Re:Too Many White Males by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      They tried that with the Ghostbusters reboot and it failed. As expected.

      Being a reboot where all they did was flip the genders around is the main reason why I not didn't see it but why I also wanted that travesty to fail. Had it been a sequel featuring the daughters of the original Ghostbusters I could have gotten behind it but a remake where they're all just women and where they casted a bunch of unfunny ones at that was just a disaster waiting to happen.

      My problem was that I wouldn't have been particularly interested no matter which women they'd cast. They lost me pretty much immediately when they thought that the line to sell that clunker was 'Same movie, but with the team being chicks!"--if I want to see the Ghostbusters, for less than the price of a movie ticket I can get the original on DVD. Plus, I'd not be left with the nasty feeling that I'd rewarded Hollywood for treating women as cheap, lazy gimmicks.

      The movie I wanted and would have paid to see? Something along the lines of 'daughters of the original Ghostbusters' would definitely be it.

    9. Re:Too Many White Males by Firefly1 · · Score: 1

      The movie I wanted and would have paid to see? Something along the lines of 'daughters of the original Ghostbusters' would definitely be it.

      In that case, I will put forward for consideration this pair of ideas I've had fermenting for some time now...

      First, do a proper sequel... a decade or two after the second movie, wherein the OGBs (less Egon, seeing as Raimis is no longer with us) realize that it's high time they train up their successors, as it were... one of which could be a daughter of theirs. This would have the additional benefit of world-building - we'd be able to explore how the state of the art of paranormal investigation and elimination has advanced, considering that they won't be the only interested folks...

      Or... back in the original movie, Peter noted the franchise rights would be worth a pretty penny (and if I recall right, the pen-and-paper RPG and some of the older computer game treatments had as conceit that the players were a franchise!). You could go with this - not only presenting an all-new team, but freedom of setting. Consider the paranormal potential of someplace like Los Angeles, or Miami, or New Orleans...

      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
    10. Re:Too Many White Males by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      There's nothing that'd keep you from having both going on at once--especially since once you've established that there are Ghostbusters teams elsewhere, you would lose a lot of the problems with getting the cast back together for a sequel with no need to actually write out a character. They're just busy elsewhere, doing other things.

  11. you forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SPIDERMAN! MORE SPIDERMAN MOVIES!

    gettin super sick of the super hero movies.

  12. Re:Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It only looks leftist because of how far gone you are. Hollywood actually has a corporate agenda.

  13. No originality .... by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The heavy left-wing political slant most Hollywood stars and writers want to impart on films isn't helping sales either. But IMO, the lack of movies worth the price of admission to see is the biggest issue.

    I actually enjoy going to the theater to see a movie sometimes. I'm not much of a sports person so I don't go to see games. A good movie is an excuse to get out of the house with the family and to buy bragging rights that we saw a newly released film long before it comes out on video. All the complaints about unruly crowds and teens using their phones through entire movies? I've encountered a bit of that, but it's more the exception than the rule - at least at the theaters I go to.

    But the movie has to be worth seeing! With so many sequels and remakes, there's not a whole lot left! Anything in one of those categories is best rented and watched at home, IMO. Some of the remakes are mildly amusing or entertaining, but practically never rise to the level of justifying buying a group of adult movie tickets at over $11 each, plus popcorn or sodas or what-not at hugely inflated theater prices.

    I think the superhero movies from Marvel and DC have done so well because there were so many good stories to tell there. We have many decades of comic books being printed that were all but ignored on the big screen until now. Even so? You've still got Hollywood trying to milk some of the best known ones (Spiderman, Batman and Superman) with regular re-releases of films about them, sometimes rehashing the same basic story different ways. It feels like the producers and directors are making these more for themselves than for the audience?

    But sometimes you've just had enough of seeing yet another superhero movie, too. Then what? The Fast and the Furious movies started out as ideal summer action/fantasy films - but by this last one? It just went over the top on stretching your belief. "I'll just push this torpedo that's flying here and change its direction." Come on! A good car movie needs to have scenes that at least make some attempt at being plausible.

    And some will disagree, but I feel like the "horror movie" genre was all played out by some time in the 1990's, if not earlier. 90% of them are pretty much formula material, aimed at an audience young enough to not have watched a lot of the older stuff first. Nobody else would find much of it worthwhile at all. And again, any of the true classics they came up with got rehashed with SO many sequels it became a farce. (Anyone up for another Chucky movie? Or hey, maybe we could redo the Exorcist one more time?)

    Personally, I'm into sci-fi more than most genres, and Hollywood manages to do a decent job with that occasionally. But not often. And worse yet? When they promise a lot but get it all wrong, they alienate people who you managed to drag along who weren't really into sci-fi but resigned to give it a chance. How many times will they try again when future sci-fi movies come out?

    I was just telling a friend of mine earlier today ..... as much as we all loved "Office Space", I think I'm glad they didn't try to do a sequel. I mean, it's another obvious cash grab for Hollywood if they did. But it would probably be awful. I think you could do it right, at least for one more movie. But you'd need to tell a whole new story about a different company, with a whole new cast of interesting characters. And for comic relief, re-insert a couple of the originals. Maybe Lumbergh finds a new job as a middle manager at the new company, since crappy middle managers always seem to manage to keep getting re-hired at places in real life. I think instead, they'd screw it all up trying to tell some stupid story about how all the characters find themselves doing the same kind of work at a new place.

    1. Re:No originality .... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The heavy left-wing political slant most Hollywood stars and writers want to impart on films isn't helping sales either

      Annoying yes (especially in "Ghost in the Shell" and "Suicide Squad" where it was stuck on very awkwardly in a way that didn't fit the plots) but it's how the slant is applied. For example, every single "Godzilla" movie has the slant, it's part of the genre, but it doesn't have to be so annoying.

    2. Re:No originality .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the characters by the same, except: black, female, and gay. Also the storyline would be the same, but they would remove all the sarcastic humor and violence then claim we don't like diversity when it fails.

    3. Re:No originality .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The heavy left-wing political slant most Hollywood stars and writers want to impart on films isn't helping sales either

      Annoying yes (especially in "Ghost in the Shell" and "Suicide Squad" where it was stuck on very awkwardly in a way that didn't fit the plots) but it's how the slant is applied. For example, every single "Godzilla" movie has the slant, it's part of the genre, but it doesn't have to be so annoying.

      How about the remake of The Andromeda Strain? The book was awesome, and the old 70s movie was great. The remake changed the entire message of the movie to be about global warming instead of an alien parasite. Weak sauce Hollywood.

    4. Re:No originality .... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      How about the remake of The Andromeda Strain?

      They made it twice?
      The message in the wet dream about doctors with nukes novel (thankfully watered down in the first film) was overbearing enough without adding to it.

      The thing with the two I mentioned is the laid on thick message of "don't trust your boss" ran entirely counter to the plots. All those resources used by the bad guys for no other purpose than to foil their own plans - yeah, right. They are probably twenty minutes of cut and fill away from being very good movies but the "message" had to be plastered in.
      See also "Apocalypso" - a two minute cut away from being a good film once the laid on thick "message" and the jarring only bit of supernatural stuff in the movie is removed.

    5. Re:No originality .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you start to feel that way (and believe me, it's something that comes to most of us) - that's your world experience telling you that you've finally outgrown mindless action movies. Not to say that you'll never enjoy one again, but the formula by itself is no longer enough to grip your attention.

      Try broadening your genres. If I do a search for "movies currently showing near Phoenix" (random American city), I see: Annabelle: Creation, The Dark Tower, The Nut Job 2, Dunkirk, Emoji Movie, Kidnap, Girls Trip, Spider-Man: Homecoming, Detroit, Atomic Blonde, Despicable Me 3, The Glass Castle, War for the Planet of the Apes, An Inconvenient Sequel, The Hitman's Bodyguard, Wonder Woman (and many more, but let's take that as a representative sample). Out of 16 movies, that's 5/6 (depending how you count them) sequels/franchises, and the rest are new.

      If you really think there are "so many sequels and remakes", that tells me that you're paying disproportionate attention to a segment of the movie industry that's specifically aimed at young people. Nobody who saw the original Ghostbusters or Flatliners when they were young enough to enjoy those movies, wants to see the remakes. But they're not aimed at those people.

    6. Re:No originality .... by enrique556 · · Score: 0

      Artistic people are inherently left wing, and that's okay, as long as they remember that they're not philosophers or politicians, they're entertainers. I say they're inherently left wing - I think so because they tend to be open-minded, crave acceptance of others, and enjoy exploring new things.
      Anyhow, the SJW stink was heavy in Rogue One but didn't ruin it for me. If anyone who saw this movie and still says hollywood isn't making good movies at the moment, then I can't understand them. If you try to watch movies from the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s or 90s you will gain more of an appreciation for how fucking well modern movies are made. Not just film noir, or action blockbuster, or spy thriller, or comedy, or sci fi; all of them. I'd say 95% of the 100 best films of all time were made in the last 10 years.

      Anyhow, my main point is that you will inevitably get left wing ideology embedded in entertainment and art, the correct course of action is for us to call out the ones who deign to patronise to us inferior folk and remind them that our interest in them only extends as far as they keep us entertained.

    7. Re:No originality .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm completely left wing, but this bias you perceive doesn't make the box office more appealing. I come for a good story, good acting, etc. Lately Hollywood is all about (as others have mentioned) pointless remakes and sequels. Come up with something original already!

    8. Re:No originality .... by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      I know some very religious artists that are open-minded and enjoy exploring new things. Meanwhile, I also know atheists and leftists who are very close minded, categorize everythingg they do not like as facism or sexism or racism, and are not easy to hang around with. Open-mindedness is not part of any ideology, and to some extent, contradicts the idea of having an ideology at all.

    9. Re:No originality .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the lack of movies worth the price of admission to see is the biggest issue" I agree that this is a big part of the problem. Hollyweed also refuses to update from their 1940-to1950s marketing strategies. If you have decent movie theaters, you are lucky and the exception from what I have seen and read. The local theaters here are terrible! Noisy, unruly brats, inconsiderate boobs that cannot put down or shut off their phones for an hour, and as you mention, vastly inflated prices for sub-standard drinks and snacks!

      Hollyweed also thinks that their movies and TV shows are worth far more than they really are! They still believe that creating artificial shortages of content will keep prices high, but in the digital age, people know that digital copies of TV shows and movies are easy to create, and cost almost nothing to make.

      The biggest problem is that Hollyweed has run out of new ideas for GOOD TV shows and movies, and wants to keep regurgitating the same old crap over and over again, and again, and again, and again, and again!

    10. Re:No originality .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wait for the DVD.

    11. Re:No originality .... by dddux · · Score: 1

      "It feels like the producers and directors are making these more for themselves than for the audience?" Actually the problem is they're making these movies for the *general* audience, catering to the lowest denominator. That's how you get so many dumb films.

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
    12. Re:No originality .... by dddux · · Score: 1

      Very good thinking. Have you read some Jiddu Krishnamurti lately? I love this guy's philosophy.

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
  14. Movie theaters are just nuisances anymore. by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

    I've had so many bad experiences at local theaters, the IMAX's are always full so you have to stand in line too long to get a good seat, parking garages are full on the weekends, the food and drink is too expensive and poor quality, people on phones and noisy eaters, the quality of the movies are mediocre. Then top it off, Hollywood is insulting people by making remakes and putting social justice in them.

    I'd rather just buy or redbox the blue ray and order a pizza, cheaper, I can pause the movie, and no annoying people.

    I even avoided the Guardians of the Galaxy 2 and waited for it on blue ray.

    And do I really want to see another Star Trek where they destroy the Enterprise again?

    No.

    1. Re:Movie theaters are just nuisances anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?? I've been to Imax in Manhattan several times and got great seats, often almost the theater to ourselves because we picked slightly off times to go or got there early.

  15. Xena Warrior Princess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just read this morning that they are thinking about a Xena reboot where she and Gabriel are openly gay. If Vivid options the rights, I'll definitely see that!!!

    1. Re:Xena Warrior Princess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  16. Re:Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You only say it's right because of how far left you are. The left has an 'I am more virtuous than you' agenda.

  17. Well... by Yunzil · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hollywood keeps throwing gobs of money at an unwanted fifth installment of Pirates of the Caribbean, more Transformers movies, and putting $175 million into King Arthur: Legend of the Sword, and then clutching their pearls in shock that no one wanted to see them.

    Pirates of the Caribbean 5
    Production budget: $230,000000
    Worldwide gross: $781,537,470

    Transformers 5
    Production budget: $217,000,000
    Worldwide gross: $586,549,576

    Somebody, somewhere wanted to see them, which is why Hollywood keeps making them.

    1. Re:Well... by locater16 · · Score: 1

      It's an exaggeration, probably one that shouldn't have been made, demonstrating the return on investment for continuing tired franchises and crap adaptations is shrinking compared to the heights hit in recent years. The party involved with neverending sequels of decade plus year old franchises and superheroes movies is finally winding down it seems. And considering it can take years to get big budgets movies from concept to box office it means Hollywood will need to start taking notice ASAP.

    2. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always though that the only ones that enjoy Transformers movies are 80's kids.

    3. Re:Well... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Somebody, somewhere wanted to see them, which is why Hollywood keeps making them.

      Well that's rare. Someone on Slashdot actually used thought and evidence in a discussion on the quality of movies. You sir are right on point. Everyone that is saying "movies suck, cinemas suck, Hollywood is dying, no one goes to the movies" is ignoring the fact that each of these are fundamentally businesses and exist primarily to make money, and usually they actually do make money hand over fist.

      Then when someone does have an original thought, or someone does adapt something that isn't mainstream it fails in the box office. What this really points to is a massive dichotomy between Slashdot readership and the real world.

      This site has a self awareness problem.

    4. Re:Well... by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      They probably haven't made a profit though, thanks to Hollywood Accounting.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    5. Re:Well... by mckwant · · Score: 1

      Anybody got a rule of thumb for that? I swear I read once that things START getting profitable when domestic box office gets to 4x production costs.

      Worldwide box office, I got nothing.

      --
      ceci n'est pas un sig.
    6. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. When I read this: " Instead of giving moviegoers more badass female leads and genre-bending horror films", eh, I don't go to a movie because of that. Frankly, I don't care if it's a male or female lead as long as the story is good as in the acting and production. Basically, the person who wrote this submission is saying movie turnout sucks because males and non-horror movies.

      My guess is it's the same type of person who disliked Dunkirk due to it's lack of prominent female and/or non-white characters.. at the beach... in WWII...

    7. Re:Well... by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      The rule of thumb is that if a film has a lot of people who have been contracted to get a share of the profits, the movie never makes a profit.

      Domestic box office takings for Return of the Jedi was 10x production costs. It is yet to make a profit on paper.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  18. Re: Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More Virtuous? I thought the religious right had the trademark on that.

  19. Re:Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who invented emojis? Millennials. Who invented millennials? Leftists. Checkmate, Martian.

    I bet you aren't even from Mars.

  20. I saw Dunkirk last week by Snotnose · · Score: 2

    Got there when the show was about to start. Spent a good 10 minutes watching nothing but ads. Then the previews. I hate previews, they tend to give away the major plot points, or show funny stuff that doesn't show up in the movie. Some 30 minutes after the movie was supposed to start it started.

    I snuck in a bottle of water and some trail mix

    Great move, bad experience.

    / snuck in - they were in my pockets, pretty obvious to anyone who cared
    // $4 for $0.33 worth of popcorn? Ok, I don't have a microwave in your theater. But still..
    /// $5 for sweetened ice tea, when I prefer mine unsweetened? Remind me again why I never see movies in theaters.

    1. Re:I saw Dunkirk last week by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      So go in 20 minutes later?

  21. Hmmm. by Bartles · · Score: 5, Insightful

    WSJ reports that movie attendance has dropped by 5%, compared with the same period in 2016, and revenues are down, too, dipping just 2.9%, thanks to higher ticket prices making up for the lack of ticket sales.

    If you raise prices and revenue decreases, it means that prices are too high. There's a simple fix to their problem.

    1. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      torrent/pirating/bitcoinz/video gaymez!!!!111one. OOOO LOOK BLINKY LIGH!@$#$#%#@%&!#NO CARRIER.

    2. Re:Hmmm. by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      I like the phrase the summary threw in about "badass female leads and genre bending horror"....as if lack of those was the problem. Now don't get me wrong, bad-ass female leads kicking ass makes me hard, and horror story that is well done is fun too....but a good story can have any and all kinds of characters, even an old WASP millionaire

    3. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the phrase the summary threw in about "badass female leads and genre bending horror"....as if lack of those was the problem. Now don't get me wrong, bad-ass female leads kicking ass makes me hard, and horror story that is well done is fun too....but a good story can have any and all kinds of characters, even an old WASP millionaire

      Yep, I'm not going to see a movie that looks bad just because it's a girl power fantasy instead of a male empowerment one. I'm not too fond of horror films anyway either.

    4. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so simple, sadly. Movie theaters spent a shitload of money on upgrading themselves to show 3d movies (remember those?), and now they need to make that money back somehow.

      Thank you James Cameron.

    5. Re:Hmmm. by Minupla · · Score: 1

      Yep, simple fix - no more http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/UsefulNotes/HollywoodAccounting

      "Darling! This is the Industry! The really creative people are the accountants. A big studio got over half the profit, after setting breakeven at about three times the cost, taking twenty-five percent of income as an overhead charge, and taking thirty percent of income as a distribution charge, plus rental fees, and prime interest on what they advanced."
      â" John D. MacDonald, Free Fall in Crimson

      --
      On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
    6. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you raise prices and revenue decreases, it means that prices are too high. There's a simple fix to their problem.

      Better make out space for teenagers?

  22. Re:Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by Boronx · · Score: 1

    You can't blame someone for feeling more virtuous than a Trump voter.

  23. Re:Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The rights and the lefts both think they have the moral high ground and pompously profess to be good guys.

    The centrists meanwhile, entirely disconnected from the frothing-at-the-mouth rhetoric that the rights and lefts are so maddeningly in love with, live far happier and more productive and rewarding lives.

  24. It's China by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ticket sales are down in the US because the movies are geared to the Chinese market. They're less desirable (weaker dialog so it's easier to dub, watered down plots to make it through Chinese censors) but folks still go see them, they just don't keep going again and again. Profits in the States are down but that's dwarfed by the profits in the US.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:It's China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So .... not the Russians then?

    2. Re:It's China by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      ticket sales are down in the US because the movies are geared to the Chinese market. They're less desirable (weaker dialog so it's easier to dub, watered down plots to make it through Chinese censors) but folks still go see them, they just don't keep going again and again. Profits in the States are down but that's dwarfed by the profits in the US.

      Exactly. Even a movie like Transformers doesn't hide it - Chinese production companies are right there front and center.

      Heck, Huahua Media, according to IMDB are involved with the following 2017 films: Transformers 5, xXx Return of Xander Cage, Ghost In the Shell, Jack Reacher and Star Trek Beyond.

      The Chinese are very interested in Hollywood movies, and Hollywood is more than willing to put up their usual crap to an audience that demands it and is willing to pay for it. Hell, if it isn't done in 3D, they will complain, so the Chinese are demanding more expensive 3D tickets, too (none of the complaints about 3D really affect anyone other than North America).

  25. Maybe the good movies are shifting to Winter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My understanding that winter has been growing as a time to release blockbuster movies. The Last Jedi was delayed from May 2017 to December 2017. The LOTR and Hobbit series were released then as well.

  26. "TFA" is basically a fan-made trailer for real TFA by denzacar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Real TFA doesn't even mention emojis OR "more badass female leads and genre-bending horror films".
    All that was injected into discourse by the "writer" of that blogpost masquerading as TFA.

    Cause... clickbait.

    Basically, it boils down to more expensive tickets...
    A summer without a real mega-blockbuster cause all the slots were taken by expensive non-starters or franchises which have overextended their welcome and overpaid for the production...
    And talk about earlier streaming options making distributors nervous. Very nervous.
    Also... Chinese investors. But mostly it's about streaming.

    No agendas.
    Nor is it about genre-bending horrors and chicks who punch people.
    It's about distributors riding their favorite geldings along the road - when a strange mechanical contraption suddenly roared passed them, leaving them and their animals shaken and scared in a cloud of dust and exhaust fumes.
    And then a different machine FLEW over them! GASP!
    Is this the end of the horse industry as we know it?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  27. Re:Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed! I have decided I will no longer view new movies at the theater but will instead pirate them. That will cost Hollywoods leftist elite money rather than help to line their pockets..

  28. Re: Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by Stormwatch · · Score: 0

    No more. The SJWs have culturally appropriated that.

  29. Re:Sneaking in snacks is for kids or manchildren by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't like the prices? Don't go. Don't like the experience? Don't go.

    And here we are discussing why less and less people are attending the cinema (or buying BluRay/DVD anymore).

    Because you end up sitting through 30 minutes of ads and "you wouldn't steal or car, please don't steal our movie" crap before the movie starts. You can't even skip it in a lot of BluRay discs now.

    I know what would get me to the cinema more:

    1. Banning mobile phones in the room.
    2. $10 tickets all day every day.
    3. No ads, only one or two previews.
    4. No "stealing this movie is a crime" lies.
    5. (The real clincher) Something worth actually seeing.

  30. Re: Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the Special Jesus Warriors have certainly dropped the ball in that department in the last 50 years or so.

    Captcha virgins!

  31. TV Screen Size and Quality by DumbSwede · · Score: 3, Informative

    This seems no surprise to me. Movie experience is essentially a constant. TVs keep getting better and bigger. I find little difference these days watching movies at home. In fact until we've had a 10 foot projection screen in our media room since 2008. I had a tri-beam data-grade projector back in 2000 that I powered with a myHD card. I haven't cared that much about seeing things in the theater since the introduction of Blu-Ray. With shows like Game of Thrones you essentially get a movie fix once a week minimum anyway. Here is the main thing. Learn to delay gratification. Once your watching everything 6 months delayed, your watching the same amount of content and basically the same amount of enjoyment for a lot lower cost point (which helps pay for your kick-ass media room).

    1. Re:TV Screen Size and Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Stereo blows away the theater. I was almost offended last time I went a couple years ago that I would pay 10-15$ for a ticket and the sound system was so shitty....

    2. Re:TV Screen Size and Quality by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      AMEN!!

      In fact, what's happening now is that all the best creative work is being done for _television_, of all things. Besides the obvious success of "Game of Thrones," don't forget once AMC showed you can create great TV shows like "Mad Men" and "Breaking Bad," it showed that the best creative stuff in Hollywood were high production value TV shows of 9-12 episodes per season. And once Netflix and Amazon jumped in with their shows that (mostly) drop with a whole season all at the same time (and can be streamed in HD), interest in movie theaters have dropped quite a bit.

      By the way, you're correct about HDTV being a major killer of movie theaters. Especially now when 60-plus inch (diagonal) HDTV sets are dirt cheap and you can get very good surround-sound systems along with it at reasonable prices. And with a home theater, you can easily pause and even rewind to a favorite scene, even in streaming. Not to mention making your own snacks for really cheap, too.

  32. Re:Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by SacredNaCl · · Score: 0, Troll

    I agree. I'm not paying good money to have hollywood's multicultural and politically correct agenda rammed down my throat. Even on those rare occasions where that agenda is not as blatant the movie itself is usually geared toward lowering the values and generating a decline in the culture. I've largely given up on TV for the same reasons.

    --
    Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
  33. Re:"TFA" is basically a fan-made trailer for real by ark1 · · Score: 1

    Hollywood does not produce poor entertainment. Any dip in revenues is because of those pesky pirates!.
    On a more serious note, how does this year compare to other years than 2016? Seems like one year comparison is a small sample.

  34. Welcome to the demand curve by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

    WSJ reports that movie attendance has dropped by 5%, compared with the same period in 2016, and revenues are down, too, dipping just 2.9%, thanks to higher ticket prices making up for the lack of ticket sales.

    Or, the movie theaters jacked the prices (again) and attendance dropped (again).

    This need have nothing to do with a sudden change in the quality of the content. It sucked last year; it sucks this year. But every time they raise prices, they increase the likelihood that the population that doesn't otherwise care how much the content sucks is still going to go find something else cheaper to do.

  35. more family oriented less smut. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Need to make less smut and more family movies.

  36. Re: Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've largely given up on TV, except Fox News. Turn off the Red Media, go outside, and enjoy your life. Stop worrying about what a tiny fraction of the dumbest liberals did today, as brought to you and magnified by the people who hate them most.

  37. Re: Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still not working, comrade. Find a new slogan.

  38. Tired of SJW nonsense in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So i don't go see them anymore.

  39. Re:Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Funny, I didn't realize a 45-year old Japanese engineer working for NTT DoCoMo is considered a millennial...

  40. Bullshit by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

    Box office ticket sales have hovered around 1.3 million per year for over two decades. Some years have sold a couple million more, some have sold a couple million less, but the trend is relatively flat. There has been no huge drop in people going to see movies.

  41. Movies are too expensive by nikhilhs · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's because the price of movies keeps going up and a significant percentage of the population has seen their wages stagnate.

    1. Re:Movies are too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's because the price of movies keeps going up and a significant percentage of the population has seen their wages stagnate.

      Open a drive-in movie theater and I'm there. $25/car load and it's on. Instead of getting a small popcorn at the theater for $8, I'll just fill my trunk with popcorn for $0.25. Give me a radio station to tune into so I can close my windows and not have to listen to other idiots take phone calls....sounds perfect.

  42. old man rants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Movie theaters are too loud! Kids are too disrespectful! The Demmycrats are taking my money! I can sit at home and watch Patton movies for a fraction of the price!

  43. Bad language by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Does anybody go to a movie so that they can hear characters saying "fuck" and "shit"?

    I avoid such movies if I can. I suspect others do also. The laziness and incompetence of writers that result in the inclusion of such words causes other aspects of the movie to degrade. Fewer people want to see inferior movies.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  44. Re:Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, I didn't realize a 45-year old Japanese engineer working for NTT DoCoMo is considered a millennial...

    Everyone knows the Japanese age slower. It's the radiation...

  45. Valerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here was a non-Hollywood movie that got killed in the reviews. The first half had no faults, was kick-ass, and to me was worth the price of the ticket. And you know why many people didn't like it? Because it did not fit the superhero mold that people still seem to love. Face it, Hollywood gives you what sells tickets.

    1. Re: Valerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet the really really bad reviews did not hurt the emoji movie which now has a total gross surpassing valerian: http://www.the-numbers.com/market/2017/top-grossing-movies
      Look for an emoji movie sequel next year but not valerian.

  46. Re: Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by bursch-X · · Score: 1

    Yes you can, if they're not.

    --
    There are two rules for success:
    1. Never tell everything you know.
  47. Re: Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Happened about the time Christians stopped caring about wha Jesus said and did.

  48. Re:"TFA" is basically a fan-made trailer for real by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Tell that to people who believe that "Since I made X money last year I should make at least as much this year".

    Except it's not even years but quarters.
    From TFA:
    "If Walt Disney Co. had released its live-action "Beauty and the Beast" one month later than its March 17 debut, "we'd be looking at this [quarter] a whole lot differently," said Mark Zoradi, CEO at Cinemark Holdings Inc., the nation's third-largest exhibitor."

    They are literally hanging the hopes of the entire industry on a single movie.
    Which it's another remake. Of a cartoon fairy tale about joys and wonders of Stockholm syndrome and human sacrifice.
    But had it been released only a month later...

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  49. Stop blasting my ears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I might see more movies

  50. "more badass female leads" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Instead of giving moviegoers more badass female leads"

    At this point I am more surprised when I see a traditionally feminine woman in a film than when I see some kung-fu dyke with a JUST haircut and the mouth of a sailor. I assure you that "badass female" is the last thing I want to see - it is the least interesting.

  51. Re: Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by Evtim · · Score: 2

    And at the very root the issue is that the beancounters run the whole industry these days. The process began in the 70ties but then it was the cheesemakers who just bought the studios and by mistake did a good thing - gave opportunities to young directors to experiment a bit a make movies for young people. Thus we got all those directors considered icons of the second half of 20th century.
    But some of those innovative movies flopped on release while becoming all time classic (e.g. Blade runner).
    Today the marketeers won't take any risks with such lavish budgets. No experiments, no original vision. Research says there are still enough people to buy Fsat and Furious 675 so that's what we will do.
    But maybe audience is getting wiser and seeing that TV shows have way bigger balls than big movies the interest is shifting.
    See also all the complaints about the theater going experience....

  52. misfire by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    > The Wall Street Journal reports that the problem goes much deeper than a single misfire

    Please allow me to interrupt here -- Ya think??

    It couldn't possibly be that Hollywood is substituting eye candy and big set pieces for an actual story that works? That they've completely underestimated how much the public, yea, even that unwashed billy-bob public that is supposed to only be interested in naked breasts and explosions, might want a compelling story that makes sense? (And maybe, since you brought it up, that nobody really thought a poop emoji voiced by Patrick Stewart was funny?)

    Nah. It must be them damned downloaders.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:misfire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just the opposite, Hollywood has been focusing too much on story this year. As an example, I didn't go see the Baywatch movie because it didn't have naked titties. Who the Hell makes an R rated comedy without titties? Inexcusable.

    2. Re:misfire by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Cursing and excrement jokes aren't "story".

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  53. Re: Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    It is kinda difficult not to be.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  54. moves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there any original movie this year worth seeing. Hollywood clamps it teeth into a file and doesnt let go until the last drop of blood is sucked out of the franchise.
    Even crappy movies get remade. Give me a good movies with a plot, good acting where the actors that play the roles would be unimportant.

  55. Holy fuck you whining motherfuckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Christ slashdot comments have become a pile of shit because of you. It's one thing to come in to a thread specifically about some bullshit gender politics and hear people whining about "the left" and "SJWs" ruining everything (and why don't well a just go back to the 50s where being white and male made one instantly higher status than anyone else because I live with my parent's and can't get a girlfriend and blah blah blah and millennial snowflakes whine too much!)...

    But we can't even talk about hollywood making shitty movies and probably blaming it on piracy without a bunch of you fuckwits crawling out of the woodwork? Jesus Christ, fuck all of you.

    1. Re:Holy fuck you whining motherfuckers by Hazelnut · · Score: 0

      Christ slashdot comments have become a pile of shit because of you. It's one thing to come in to a thread specifically about some bullshit gender politics and hear people whining about "the left" and "SJWs" ruining everything (and why don't well a just go back to the 50s where being white and male made one instantly higher status than anyone else because I live with my parent's and can't get a girlfriend and blah blah blah and millennial snowflakes whine too much!)...

      But we can't even talk about hollywood making shitty movies and probably blaming it on piracy without a bunch of you fuckwits crawling out of the woodwork? Jesus Christ, fuck all of you.

      A-fucking-men!

  56. Re: Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump voters shut up and go to work. SJW suck on the teat of the trump voters(aka workers), and ridicule them at every chance.

    No wonder SJW has easily risen to one of the top slurs in the land.

  57. The only difference to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only difference to me is whether my wife is complaining that we're not "out doing something" ...which doesn't seem like a concern compared to the downsides to seeing a movie out. She likes watching trailers, but we can just visit IMDb. *shrug*

  58. Re:Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    Emoji's are just an evolution of emoticons - Text based pictograms that were used as early as 1986. :-/

  59. Re:Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even earlier, at least 1980.

  60. Same people that threatened to strike? by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Remakes abound. Yet writers want more money, for stuff written mostly before almost all of the people on slashdot were even born, myself included and I'm over 50. Just think about that a moment, 50 years.

    Had to laugh recently about how the stupid leftists thought Wonder Woman was great. Feminist stuff in it, etc. Then they found out that the Koch brothers funded it and now they don't even want to watch it. What dimwits.

  61. Hot take: King Arthur was pretty damn awesome by Lisandro · · Score: 1

    I really enjoyed that movie and was quite surprised to find out it was considered a flop.

  62. when hollaring "Freedom!" rings hollow by epine · · Score: 1

    Big, intrusive government is left wing. There is no fundamental difference between fascism and communism, they are both based on denying individual rights.

    As it happens, I've read an intelligent comment on this matter before, right here on Slashdot. It was not yours.

    guises — December 2016

    Getting a little pedantic here: it doesn't really make much sense to assign the terms "right wing" or "left wing" to a government.

    Those terms are meant to express how a person or action or ideal relate to an existing government.

    Left is anti-establishment, Right is pro-establishment. Communism is put on the left because it was designed as a revolutionary concept — part and parcel of communism is the overthrow of existing structures of property and the power structures which go along with them.

    Likewise Fascism is on the right because it is all about supporting the state.

    This is why you call the "right" wing is so often referred to as neoliberals.

    The original liberals opposed small government (the monarchy) in favour of individual rights. Then individual rights took a wrong turn and became the oversized tumour of the social democratic state (blame Napoleon and Bismarck and FDR, who all had a hand in this).

    The jury is still out on whether small-government Libertarianism mainly delivers conceptual rights that the majority of the population can't actually eat, and whether bearing the most precious of precious Amex cards really does make you an elite silverback, once all moderating government is well and truly brushed to the sidelines.

    In all of political history, we had a comfortable, politically independent middle class for all of about 30 years (1950-1980), in a small number of confederacies, of mainly Anglo and European heritage.

    Now we've returned to the other extreme, where the wealthy can purpose just about any political privilege desired, burdened with the least possible modicum of pretense of supporting the public interest.

    I preferred the original form of freedom, the freedom one could take to the bank, without already being wealthy.

  63. i am so glad they mentioned King Arthur by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    That piece of shit "actor" Charlie Hannam must go. I want to never hear a peep about this shitface piece of shit evere again

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  64. Re:Not all movies (Alien, the best late reveal) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alien (the first in the series): The original released version (not the later director' cut). This did not reveal the mature alien in full until the final escape pod scene. Saw it "cold" (without seeing any previews) on the recommendation of a TV network reviewer. Knocked my socks off!

  65. Re: Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    For the same reason Mohammed is such a popular name - conservative people have no imagination.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  66. Re: Leftist Agenda or $$$ - Choose One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So about the time of the Nicene Convention?

  67. The length of movies is becoming problematic by sarbonn · · Score: 1

    One of the problems I've been running into is that movies these days are extremely long. Now, this could be seen as a great thing (the value versus the price), but because it's in a movie theater, you can't exactly pause the movie if you need to use the restroom, and when you're seeing a movie that goes beyond 3 hours, it's sometimes a necessity, especially if foolish enough to order a soda before the movie starts. So, almost always, I miss about ten minutes of the movie that can sometimes be a really important moment of the show (which you don't know because you've never seen the movie before). It's part of why I see fewer movies in the theater and just wait until I can watch it at home. There were a couple of movies I wanted to watch this year, but I knew the length of them was going to be problematic, and couple that with people who feel the need to check their cell phones during the movie, and you start to see why people see fewer movies in the theater.

    --
    Sarbonn's blog: http://www.sarbonn.com/blog
    1. Re:The length of movies is becoming problematic by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Longer movies used to have an intermission. Back when they used to be longer on occasion.

  68. This year has been awful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By this time last year I had gone to theaters to see 18 movies, so far this year I have only seen 4. The movies that have come out so far this year have been too conservative in terms of action, sex, and violence. Everyone is trying to make award winning films or kids films, yawn. Looking towards the remainder of 2017 I only plan on going to see Star Wars VIII.