Do you think someone's "need" to watch the lastest episode of Stranger Things should have the same priority as an MRI needed to diagnose a condition in a medical emergency?
How is a moratorium on entry of people from 7 of ~50 Muslim majority Muslim nations, by an executive order not even containing the word Muslim, a Muslim ban? Your fundamental premise is flawed.
It's the order that's on trial. Not Trump. Trump campaign statements do not have the force of law, and neither do anyone else's. But if this flies, we should start looking at campaign statements from other candidates as well. Didn't one of them say he wanted to bankrupt the coal industry?'
Who's going to be laughing when the injunction is overturned? If you really want to base your understanding of the constitution on a left wing judge from hawaii, go right ahead. The plaintiffs are already arguing in court that the EO is constitutional. But that different rules apply to Trump. Good luck with that.
In fact there's little difference between men and women _excepting_ the sexual organs themselves and people without functioning sexual organs aren't that uncommon. Just because you don't understand something doesn't make your crappy ramblings true.
That's one of the biggest lies I have ever seen on Slashdot.
I though it was odd that suddenly Netflix disappeared from the play store. I just have a tablet running CM12, and had to download from apkmirror. This is a stupid move. I'll just watch more on Amazon.
So now you're telling me what's in my analogy? Universal used car ownership? Ridiculous. I was applying the fantasy of UBI to the real world. I can't help it if you won't accept it.
As Susan Crawford writes at Backchannel, a little-known cable company, Cable One, just exposed the telecommunications industry's Achilles' heel: regulation.
What a trainwreck. A summary is supposed to be useful.
Slashdot Mirror
Wut?
Humph. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0... You were saying?
Writing an EO is acting. And it didn't ban Muslims. Making a campaign speech is not acting. And this isn't reddit.
I think that's up to them. And if you don't like it, you can go somewhere else.
Actually it is illegal. Equal protection and whatnot. You can't bankrupt a legal industry that follows the law.
Do you think someone's "need" to watch the lastest episode of Stranger Things should have the same priority as an MRI needed to diagnose a condition in a medical emergency?
No, it's not how the law works. You actually have to act. This is how left wing politics works.
How is a moratorium on entry of people from 7 of ~50 Muslim majority Muslim nations, by an executive order not even containing the word Muslim, a Muslim ban? Your fundamental premise is flawed.
It's the order that's on trial. Not Trump. Trump campaign statements do not have the force of law, and neither do anyone else's. But if this flies, we should start looking at campaign statements from other candidates as well. Didn't one of them say he wanted to bankrupt the coal industry?'
The National Enquirer said John Edwards had a love child. Were they correct?
Putin thought Hillary would win just like everyone else.
Is Ivanka going to meet with him on his airplane right before he closes the investigation? I guess that passes for impartial these days.
Who's going to be laughing when the injunction is overturned? If you really want to base your understanding of the constitution on a left wing judge from hawaii, go right ahead. The plaintiffs are already arguing in court that the EO is constitutional. But that different rules apply to Trump. Good luck with that.
Haha. Imposing net neutrality is suppression of free speech. Regulation infringes the 1st amendment, not the lack thereof.
Its not a horrible device for adults either.
In fact there's little difference between men and women _excepting_ the sexual organs themselves and people without functioning sexual organs aren't that uncommon. Just because you don't understand something doesn't make your crappy ramblings true.
That's one of the biggest lies I have ever seen on Slashdot.
Of course its their own tissues. But the result is not genitals. It's a rough facsimile of genitals.
I though it was odd that suddenly Netflix disappeared from the play store. I just have a tablet running CM12, and had to download from apkmirror. This is a stupid move. I'll just watch more on Amazon.
So you're saying UBI isn't designed to help someone who can't afford a car, buy a car to get them to a job?
So now you're telling me what's in my analogy? Universal used car ownership? Ridiculous. I was applying the fantasy of UBI to the real world. I can't help it if you won't accept it.
Rich people don't buy used cars.
So now we've gone full circle and the used car analogy applies once again.
As Susan Crawford writes at Backchannel, a little-known cable company, Cable One, just exposed the telecommunications industry's Achilles' heel: regulation.
What a trainwreck. A summary is supposed to be useful.
Where do all those places get their data?
Most industrial automation electronics run a 24v control circuit.