Slashdot Mirror


Chelsea Manning Set To Be Released From Prison, 28 Years Early (nbcnews.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from NBC News: Army whistleblower Chelsea Manning is set to walk out of prison Wednesday -- but she won't be entirely free. Manning's 35-year sentence for leaking an enormous trove of military intelligence records was commuted by President Barack Obama in January. But Manning is still appealing her conviction in a case that could take years, and the government has yet to respond to the appeal. And all the while, Private First Class Manning, 29, will remain an active duty soldier in the U.S. Army. She won't be paid a salary, and it's highly unlikely that she will be called to serve. But being placed on voluntary excess leave rather than discharged, says one of her attorneys, makes her vulnerable to new military punishment or charges if she steps out of line. Such an offense could be anything from getting into a fistfight to revealing previously unreleased classified information. Manning could even get into trouble with the military for speaking and writing. The Army private then known as Bradley Manning was just 22-year-old when she leaked nearly 750,000 military files and cables to WikiLeaks. Manning was court-martialed and sentenced in 2013 to 35 years in prison, with opportunity for parole after seven years served. n a statement given to the TODAY show the day after sentencing, Manning came out as a transgender woman. Last Tuesday, in Manning's first official statement about her plans after prison, she said, "I can see a future for myself as Chelsea."

542 comments

  1. Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Hopefully, Bradley Manning can get the treatment he needs for his mental illness.

    1. Re:Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So true, it is a tragedy.

    2. Re:Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You shave? Trim your nails? Cut your hair?

    3. Re:Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to get a tramp stamp, get my genitals pierced, have my tubes tied, and my breasts enlarged. Just like nature intended.

      I say this as a land mammal that's flying.

    4. Re:Hopefully... by Rei · · Score: 2

      It's a "tragedy" that her genitals may change? What, were you hoping to fuck her?

      --
      FSB hits! FSB hits! Your democracy dies. Do you want your possessions identified?
    5. Re:Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ***TRIGGERED***

    6. Re:Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "Trans" people have about a 40% attempted suicide rate...regardless of whether they actually go through with the transition and regardless of how supportive of environment they are in. This exceeds even inner city black youths and other minorities, who arguable have a much more oppressive environment and face much worse discrimination.

      Transgenderism is a symptom of a larger mental issue that needs to be treated, not accommodated.

    7. Re:Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Single Thing
      Brings Me
      Greater Joy
      Then Watching
      Triggered Boys
      BURMA SHAVE!

      *** TRIIIIiiiiIIiiIiGGGGggggGGggGgERRRRrrrrRRrrRrED ***

    8. Re:Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except that the treatment itself is gender reassignment, and it's effective. Example study:.

      RESULTS: After gender reassignment, in young adulthood, the GD was alleviated and psychological functioning had steadily improved. Well-being was similar to or better than same-age young adults from the general population. Improvements in psychological functioning were positively correlated with postsurgical subjective well-being.

      Example:

      Results

      A difference in SCL-90 overall psychoneurotic distress was observed at the different points of assessments (P0.003), with the most prominent decrease occurring after the initiation of hormone therapy (P<0.001). Significant decreases were found in the subscales such as anxiety, depression, interpersonal sensitivity, and hostility. Furthermore, the SCL-90 scores resembled those of a general population after hormone therapy was initiated. Analysis of the psychosocial variables showed no significant differences between pre- and postoperative assessments.

      Conclusions
      A marked reduction in psychopathology occurs during the process of sex reassignment therapy, especially after the initiation of hormone therapy.

      Example:

      Longitudinal outcome studies of gender dysphoric individuals suggest improved psychological functioning after gender reassignment treatment.

      Etc. Etc. Etc.

      You're wanting to withhold effective treatment, why exactly? Because it makes you uncomfortable? Is your identity or sexuality so fragile that you can't deal with existing in a world with transpeople, and as a consequence want them to remain untreated? Because that is the treatment.

      It's quite true that transpeople have higher suicide rates than the general population both before and after treatment (although not the same before and after). But what exactly do you expect when dealing with family rejection, workplace discrimination, medical discrimination, parenting discrimination, huge medical costs that they have to bear unlike people being treated for almost any other condition (aka, they pay in their insurance premiums for other peoples' treatments but other people don't do the same to them) and (combined with workplace discrimination) correspondingly higher rates of homelessness, higher rates of sexual assault, higher rates of physical assault, pricks passing "bathroom laws" and the like, and general anti-trans assholery, e.g. like you find here at Slashdot?

    9. Re: Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This, and it's sad how the media thinks being a woman is is bad so they call him a her. That lie is insulting to women.

    10. Re:Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahaha yes personal hygiene is exactly the same as mutilating your genitals. Great analogy, champ.

    11. Re:Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your hardware doesn't match your software but you're stuck with the hardware for life... my suggestion is to try to rewrite the software into something more compatible. Especially if the only alternative is for someone to take a hatchet to it cable modem and smash it to bits, and have them tell you it's now a nonfunctioning CD-Rom drive.

      I'm continually told that the mind is "plastic" in all other areas. Well, mold it then!

    12. Re: Hopefully... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That's not what happens, or even what might happen. What happens is otherwise healthy organs are being removed, and what is put in their place are not genitals at all, and in fact the person has no genitals after the surgery.

      You could argue all you want about whether or not that should be socially acceptable, but that is a fact, and the person becomes neuter.

    13. Re:Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      die in a fire bigot

    14. Re:Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The fact is that even AFTER re-assignment, the suicide attempts still are way above any other group. What more do you need to know to understand that it is a MENTAL issue.

      Men cannot become women and women cannot become men. The surgery is nothing more than extreme cross dressing. By indulging this instead of trying to figure out the base cause it pretty much malpractice.

    15. Re: Hopefully... by Rei · · Score: 2

      "What's put in place" is their own tissue.

      Male and female genitals develop from the same initial sets of tissues; every organ has a homologue (although those descending from the Mullerian or Wolfian ducts are degenerated to very small sizes in the opposite sex). The clitoris and glans are the same organ. Same tissue, same nerves, etc. Under the influence of testosterone, for example, the clitoris becomes several times larger. The shaft of the penis in women is bifurcated, beneath the skin, and not as developed - but still present. The labia minora and scrotum are the same tissue. Guys, see the line in the middle of your scrotum? That's where your labia fused. On and on down the line.

      Where GRS has to make compromises is with degenerated organs, where the equivalent tissues are too small to be useful. For FTMs, the shaft of the penis is the biggest challenge, while for MTFs, it's the vaginal barrel. While the lower portion of the vagina is equivalent to part of the male external tissue, the upper portion is Mullerian, which is degenerated. Hence MTF GRS uses grafts (grafts also being used for natal females with insufficient vaginal depth). Also, while testes and ovaries are equivalent organs, and most cells in the body react to changing hormones by changing their behavior (for example, breasts develop in MTFs under the influence of estrogen, and they can breastfeed a child, just like any other woman), there's not yet a technique to change the transcription factors that affect hormone production in them.

      In short, in the human body there are aspects that absolutely are reversible, and there are aspects that are not at present reversible with current technology. The techniques used to overcome the latter are the same as are used for natal-sex equivalents needing reparative or reconstructive work. Without gonadal hormone production, hormones must be taken artificially - but they are the exact same hormones as are normally found in the bloodstream, and cells respond to them in the same way.

      Now, could you clarify why exactly you care so much about their genitals?

      --
      FSB hits! FSB hits! Your democracy dies. Do you want your possessions identified?
    16. Re:Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your hardware doesn't match your software but you're stuck with the hardware for life

      Which you're not.

      As for how pliable the mind is, go ahead, make your heart stop beating for five seconds, double your blood testosterone level, make yourself become sexually aroused whenever someone talks about the moon Ganymede, and make a bad memory disappear entirely from your brain.

      Not all of the brain is subject to conscious control.

    17. Re:Hopefully... by Megol · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Black & white worldview... You know that's an indication of a personality disorder*?

      In fact there's little difference between men and women _excepting_ the sexual organs themselves and people without functioning sexual organs aren't that uncommon. Just because you don't understand something doesn't make your crappy ramblings true.

      (* well it _is_ true but most people like that are simply either idiots or assholes)

    18. Re:Hopefully... by fedos · · Score: 2

      Maybe suicide rates are affected by the fact that they're subjected to constant hate spewed by bigoted morons.

    19. Re: Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll be the one bound up in the Town Square.

    20. Re:Hopefully... by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Spoken like a true cave-man with zero understanding of the issue at hand.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    21. Re: Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Organ != tissue. I learned that in my first biology class. If I took your car and left a transmission in your driveway, then you probably wouldn't be going anywhere by car for a while. Now is this sexual reassignment moral? I really couldn't care what people do with their own bodies and I don't judge them for it. That being said, I dont like it when people tell me a transmission is a car and then bitch if I don't agree with them.

    22. Re:Hopefully... by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      This is an incredibly biased and invalid statement, straight from the mouth of an indoctrinated extremist neo conservative.

      Medically speaking, it is classified as a disorder, but they're working on changing that- even so, the cure is what she has done.

    23. Re:Hopefully... by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 0

      "It's quite true that transpeople have higher suicide rates than the general population both before and after treatment (although not the same before and after)."

      If you could take individuals who would now be diagnosed gender dysphoric to a time before gender reassignment surgery and during which society pressured them far more to stay in the closet, would they grow up as suicidal? Or has enabling their mental deformity caused health outcomes to become worse?

      I have my suspicions.

    24. Re:Hopefully... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      Your suggestion has been proven not to work. And yet, people like you keep pushing it out of willful ignorance (how hard is it to look it up on the Internet?). You know that doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is one definition of insanity, don't you?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    25. Re: Hopefully... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
      You're just jealous because you can't have multiple orgasms without a rest period in between. So you're wrong, male-to-female transsexuals have working genitals after surgery. It's female-to-male who get the shitty end of the stick, so to speak. While estrogen therapy lowers the risk of cardiovascular disease and stroke, and increases life expectancy an extra 3 years compared to women who are not on HRT, testosterone therapy increases the risks.

      BTW, the word "genitals" only refers to "a person or animal's external organs of reproduction", not the internal parts, so yes, they are genitals.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    26. Re:Hopefully... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Nope, after reassignment suicide is barely over the level of the general population. And as for your claim that "men cannot become women and women cannot become men", it happens naturally to some humans.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    27. Re: Hopefully... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Of course its their own tissues. But the result is not genitals. It's a rough facsimile of genitals.

    28. Re:Hopefully... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      In fact there's little difference between men and women _excepting_ the sexual organs themselves and people without functioning sexual organs aren't that uncommon. Just because you don't understand something doesn't make your crappy ramblings true.

      That's one of the biggest lies I have ever seen on Slashdot.

    29. Re:Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. You are the one who is indoctrinated by extremist radical left wing ideology.

      Medically speaking, it is classified as a disorder, but they're working on changing that- even so, the cure is what she has done.

      Yeah because changing the definitions of words changes reality, right?. Now if that isn't an IngSoc/SocJus/Marxist perspective...

    30. Re:Hopefully... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      No. It's a tragedy that we are expected to reenforce and prop up his delusion, and to cheer him on as though it is some kind of heroic act or accomplishment. However, he is welcome to live by those delusions/fantasies and modify his body if he wants.

    31. Re:Hopefully... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      In fact there's little difference between men and women _excepting_ the sexual organs

      Um.. what?

    32. Re: Hopefully... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 0

      You're just jealous because after they banned you from New York, people started getting healthier. Though I'm not quite sure why they did that, my guess is because you had your first initial installed on your back and were cited for indecent exposure, B-B-B-Barbara.

      Though in all seriousness, what you have are in fact not genitals, otherwise you may as well define an anus as genitals. Instead what you have is an open wound that, as we sit here, is trying to heal itself, and requires constant intervention to prevent that from happening. Sure, it may be fashioned to look similar to genitals, but it's really only a facsimile.

    33. Re: Hopefully... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      "What's put in place" is their own tissue

      Sure, but it's not genitals, and furthermore the body treats it as an open wound which actively tries to heal itself shut.

      And while I'm not one to make an issue of what people do to themselves, I think there's some cognitive dissonance between this and the Hippocratic Oath.

    34. Re: Hopefully... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Also, why do you call it GRS?

    35. Re: Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AH, golden.

    36. Re:Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (* well it _is_ true but most people like that are simply either idiots or assholes)

      Almost. It's "Most people are idiotic assholes."

    37. Re:Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the treatment itself is gender reassignment, and it's effective. Example study:.

      Well it is more than a little dishonest to leave PUBERTY SUPPRESSION out of your treatment.
      PUBERTY SUPPRESSION until a child decides its gender is the working part of the treatment. Chop chop snip snip is not ready for prime time yet.
      PUBERTY SUPPRESSION is how you end up looking like a woman and not Lyle Alzado in a hooker wig.
      PUBERTY SUPPRESSION is how as M2F you have a woman's violent crime rate rather than a man's. It may even help with blending as you behave like a woman and not a man.
      I fear you know almost 0 trans IRL.

      F2M, some doctors are not even prescribing DHT. So good luck with the end results of any plumbing work. Even with it you only get an approximation of a penis (You'd think men all over would be pushing for "Big dick technology" advances for everyone, so they can say goodbye to Smiling Bob).
      M2F you have a life time of serious upkeep on your new wedding tackle.

      The trans crowd has to allow that there are Dick Chicks and Jox with Box who will be happy as can be without having to change their genitals. "You need the surgery to be real trans and not a freak show!!!!" just leads to more suicides.

      This whole thing is pretty new and needs to be able to grow and develop on its own for a while. The surgery really needs work. Hell if humanity was going to be around in 50 year the surgery might be refined/affordable to the point people can change genders when ever they feel like it.

    38. Re: Hopefully... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The only facsimile I see here is you,. pissed off because I caught you in a blatant lie. But keep showing the world just how stupid you are - it's a great way to demonstrate that some people have an irrational hatred of transsexuals (probably because of their innate castration fear).

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    39. Re: Hopefully... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      And what exactly did I lie about, according to you?

    40. Re:Hopefully... by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      how can the study find that post reassignment that trans persons were better off psychologically than the general population? but then it still be true that they commit suicide at a greater rate?
      So they are more sane than the average person, but they still commit suicide all the time?

      Also, their are studies on both sides. This one showed that they got worse physiological and morbidity results post reassignment, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p....

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    41. Re:Hopefully... by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      This would be completely counter to our understanding of suicide. Suicide, across the world, only happens to affluent, privileged peoples.
      suicide in the African american, the Mexican american, communities is practically zero.

      Suicide is pretty much only seen in the groups with the highest standards of living, and is grouped around the persons with extreme wealth and intelligence.
      Unless the reassignment make them richer, or more intelligent, you would not expect it to effect their suicide rate.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    42. Re: Hopefully... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      an irrational hatred of transsexuals (probably because of their innate castration fear).

      By the way, you're confusing a difference of opinion with hatred.

      For example, mormons believe that their Book of Moses is an accurate translation of an old Egyptian papyrus. I tell them that they're wrong, and the Rosetta stone proves it. That doesn't mean I hate them, it just means I think they're wrong.

      Much in the same, surgery can't make a penis into a vulva. That isn't a hateful comment, it's just stating a fact.

    43. Re: Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that's never been a definition of insanity. Someone may have said it at some point, but it has never been a literal definition, psychologically, legally, or otherwise. Keep pushing your wrong info if you like, but don't expect anyone to take your own definitions seriously.

    44. Re: Hopefully... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      How soon we forget. I'll say the same thing I said then - you were caught - fuck you, liar.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    45. Re: Hopefully... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The lying fool once again demonstrates his total ignorance of the topic:

      Much in the same, surgery can't make a penis into a vulva. That isn't a hateful comment, it's just stating a fact.

      The penis isn't surgically transformed into a vulva, but a working clitoris. Moron. You've just proven you don't even know the difference between a vulva and a clit. Still a virgin, I see. Must be your lack of personality that keeps women away. Smart women!

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    46. Re: Hopefully... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Wrong. One of the definitions of insanity is irrationality. Someone who expects to have a different outcome while repeating the same action over and over again is irrational. In other words, delusional, experiencing a break with reality - in their world, cause and effect don't work in a sane fashion. That's the opposite of sane. So eat it, moron.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    47. Re:Hopefully... by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      Things change. Things were wrong- and misunderstood. Just because we're changing things and no longer doing bloodletting doesn't mean we changed reality.

    48. Re: Hopefully... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Dumbass, the reason I said vulva is because you specifically referred to the external portion. I'm not the one who defined genitals that way, you did.

    49. Re: Hopefully... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Yet another lie. YOU'RE the one who made reference to genitalia (external primary sex characteristics) here. In my reply I made the distinction quite clear. A working neoclitoris is not a vulva. And it's certainly not external.

      The reason it's so easy to transform is that both the penis and the clitoris start out as the same organ in the human fetus.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    50. Re:Hopefully... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Turning Gold into Lead indeed.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    51. Re:Hopefully... by Megol · · Score: 1

      That's the truth? I'm talking about physical differences and not social behavior patterns. Just because people tend to attribute personality feature X to gender Y the actual hardware isn't much involved in this. Partially because the same behavior is viewed as something different depending on a man or a woman is the one doing it, partially because people try to conform to the stereotypes they have learned are "natural". Guess what? Those stereotypes change with time while the actual hardware (the human body) doesn't (on the same time scale).

      There are differences of course but the fact remains it is limited, partially caused by sexual hormones and partially by differentiation when growing up. The first is possible to influence medically while the later is small (masculine males with "female" brain features and vice versa aren't uncommon) and there are indications transsexuals do have at least partially the features of their perceived gender.

    52. Re:Hopefully... by Megol · · Score: 1

      You do believe that not understanding something makes your crappy ramblings true? Well, sorry to tell you...

    53. Re: Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. You're off topic. This is a discussion about Chelsea Manning, not her genitalia.

      2. You're transphobic. You don't know the first thing about Genital Reconstruction Surgery, and yet you opine like you do. Cisgender women undergo various forms of it thousands of times daily, from hysterectomies to vaginaplasties to labiaplasties. The patient DOES have fully functioning genitals, and is capable of orgasm. Your bias is causing your mouth to make you look like an idiot AND an asshole.

    54. Re:Hopefully... by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      In fact there's little difference between men and women _excepting_ the sexual organs themselves

      Well, that an the fact that every cell in their body is different...

    55. Re: Hopefully... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Yet another lie. YOU'RE the one who made reference to genitalia (external primary sex characteristics) here [slashdot.org]. In my reply I made the distinction quite clear. A working neoclitoris is not a vulva. And it's certainly not external.

      I did not say a single word about it being external anywhere in that post. If you disagree, then quote me. Rather, you did in your reply to that, and I'll quote:

      BTW, the word "genitals" only refers to "a person or animal's external organs of reproduction", not the internal parts, so yes, they are genitals.

      from: https://slashdot.org/comments....

      Which by the way, this definition is not precise, you just used it because you got it from the first result from Google. Genitals can also refer to the internal reproductive organs, though usually when spoken it will be mentioned as internal genitals, to clarify. Nonetheless, I followed up in the exact manner that you used it, hence the mention of vulva (which you don't have, by the way, yours is at best described as an open wound; any other description is non-scientific and/or not related to biology, akin to referring to a quadcopter as a bird.)

      Also, I like how you're constantly trying to prove your a real woman, and on the few times I've spoken to real women about this subject (including my girlfriend) it seems that their belief is that people like you are nothing more than usurpers when you try to speak on behalf of them, so please stop doing it, because you're just a narcissist going way out of his way to draw attention to himself, and you're not a woman. (You don't even write like a woman, which means you most certainly don't have a female mind. You're just a man full of estrogen and removed genitals.)

      That is all I have to say on this subject.

    56. Re: Hopefully... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You used the term vulva, idiot. That's external. Or did you fail biology like you failed everything else.

      BTW - "you don't even write like a woman" is a load of crap. How is a woman supposed to write? With all deference to male privilege? Too weak and fearful to call out bullshitters like you? All emotional and hysterical, no logic or facts? "Knowing our place?" Here's a news flash - those "good ole days" are long gone, and never coming back, you dumb hick. With that remark you've shown that women are the great unknown in your life. As I said, it was expected - your personality is the perfect contraceptive.

      The real question is why you, and people like you, insist on going on and on about gender transition when the story is about intelligence leaks and the subsequent pardon. My guess? You know deep down that what Chelsea Manning did was morally and ethically right, and that you would never have the guts to do it. Hence the side-tracking.

      You're so transparent it's pitiful.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    57. Re: Hopefully... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      You used the term vulva, idiot. That's external.

      Didn't I just explain why I used that term? Oh yes, I did.

      BTW - "you don't even write like a woman" is a load of crap. How is a woman supposed to write? With all deference to male privilege? Too weak and fearful to call out bullshitters like you? All emotional and hysterical, no logic or facts? "Knowing our place?" Here's a news flash - those "good ole days" are long gone, and never coming back, you dumb hick. With that remark you've shown that women are the great unknown in your life. As I said, it was expected - your personality is the perfect contraceptive.

      Nope, it's more nuanced than that; I suggest you do some research rather than sit here and denigrate real women.

      http://bfy.tw/Bt9q

      The real question is why you, and people like you, insist on going on and on about gender transition when the story is about intelligence leaks and the subsequent pardon. My guess?

      Any guess you make other than "B-b-b-blubber Hudson keeps egging on the conversation" is wrong.

    58. Re: Hopefully... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
      Nobody cares about your excuses for making mistakes. Nobody. Not even me. We already know that your problem is that you can't get laid. Maybe it's because you're doing a LOT wrong.

      Here's a clue - most women watching you bash trans-women will find you obnoxious. With the exception of old, dried-up TERFs, women tend to show solidarity with us. It's the men who more often have to be beaten with a cluestick. For some reason, many deep down see us as traitors for giving up male privilege. And you're too stupid to realize you're being trolled (same as most suckers when I was trolling under my former name).

      Come on, fess up, you LIKE the abuse. At least it's attention of some sort. It's why you continually seek it out. And you can't deny you're the instigator in every case. I'm not the one going after you for your being an obese slob who can't get laid.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    59. Re: Hopefully... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Nobody cares about your excuses for making mistakes.

      I don't recall making any in any recent posts.

      Here's a clue - most women watching you bash trans-women will find you obnoxious.

      No, just the ones in your social bubble, just like how most republicans think most people think democrats are obnoxious, or how most democrats think most people think republicans are obnoxious.

      With the exception of old, dried-up TERFs

      I only know one feminist IRL; most girls I meet either don't like feminism or are sex positive feminists.

      you're too stupid to realize you're being trolled

      You're the only one getting all worked up, so you're basically trolling yourself.

      I'm not the one going after you for your being an obese slob who can't get laid.

      Pretty sure we've already established that you're a trans-fat.

  2. Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a happy day amidst troubled times. Thanks Chelsea, for having done the right thing, and thanks Obama.

    1. Re: Yay! by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Helping to expose corruption, deeply unethical behavior and widespread human rights violations.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    2. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      What did he actually expose?

      All he did was download a bunch of diplomatic cables and release them without having any idea what was in them.

      The guy is a moron.

    3. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so much "Get out of Jail" as "Get away from Torture".
      There was no sing of any transgender tendencies before.
      I wouldn't be surprised if they even told him he was a little girl.

    4. Re: Yay! by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Boston Tea Party was treason too.
      Sometimes treason is the right thing.

    5. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They should have locked him up and thrown away the key.

      She was jailed for embarrassing the elite, shining a light on their corruption, exposing their violations of human rights, and this is your response? The ends justify the means? If anyone needs to be locked up it's you. You'd create WWIII just to save face. No ends justify human rights violations. The fact that the government got embarrassed and took out their frustrations on the whistle-blower is just more proof that they had no justification for their misgivings.

      I guess you volunteer to cut your dick off you get a "Get out of Jail Free" card....?

      More like they knew Manning dying in a military prison would make her a martyr, and their already bruised egos couldn't take another hit. That and they didn't want her death both justifying her efforts, and encouraging other would be whistleblowers on their watch.

      Personally, I hope she gets to live a fulfilling life out of prison, but the pessimist in me is nagging: She'll probably die as the result of an "accident" once the dust settles.

    6. Re: Yay! by Rei · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There was no sing of any transgender tendencies before.

      Someone clearly wasn't paying attention.

      (1:11:54 PM) bradass87: and... its important that it gets out... i feel, for some bizarre reason
      (1:12:02 PM) bradass87: it might actually change something
      (1:13:10 PM) bradass87: i just... dont wish to be a part of it... at least not now... im not ready... i wouldn't mind going to prison for the rest of my life, or being executed so much, if it wasn't for the possibility of having pictures of me... plastered all over the world press... as boy...
      (1:14:11 PM) bradass87: i've totally lost my mind... i make no sense... the CPU is not made for this motherboard...
      (1:14:42 PM) bradass87: s/as boy/as a boy
      (1:30:32 PM) bradass87: >sigh<
      (1:31:40 PM) bradass87: i just wanted enough time to figure myself out... to be myself... and be running around all the time, trying to meet someone else's expectations
      (1:32:01 PM) bradass87: *and not be
      (1:33:03 PM) bradass87: im just kind of drifting now...
      (1:34:11 PM) bradass87: waiting to redeploy to the US, be discharged... and figure out how on earth im going to transition
      (1:34:45 PM) bradass87: all while witnessing the world freak out as its most intimate secrets are revealed
      (1:35:06 PM) bradass87: its such an awkward place to be in, emotionally and psychologically

      --
      FSB hits! FSB hits! Your democracy dies. Do you want your possessions identified?
    7. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, supporting the people he swore to protect, against their enemy. Not leaking would have been the treason. Manning was tempted to commit treason, and had he been weaker or more fearful of the enemy's counter-attack, might have done so. But instead, he courageously avoided doing the easy thing and took personal risk. Something like a Distinguished Service Medal would be warranted here.

      I think it's too late now, but if we want to look for treason, I'd start looking into whoever else knew about the information and failed to leak it. Why did they abandon the United States in its time of need? Why did they betray us all? I can understand people's desire that our enemies be punished.

    8. Re: Yay! by syn3rg · · Score: 1

      >the people he swore to protect
      He actually swore to uphold the Constitution.
      Common misconception.

      --
      The contents of this message have been doubly encrypted by ROT13
    9. Re: Yay! by cayenne8 · · Score: 0

      More like they knew Manning dying in a military prison would make her a martyr

      Seriously?

      If he'd have offed himself in prison, it would have been a blip in the news for 1-2 days tops, and then been forgotten into oblivion.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    10. Re: Yay! by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      It worked for Bruce Jenner after he killed somebody in a bout of totally reckless driving, and then subsequently blamed it on one of his victims. The media didn't give a shit about that; he just got a sex change and then was immediately branded a hero.

    11. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SHE fuckface, she's a she. I don't care if you don't like it or don't agree (being a fuckface and all) but use the correct pronoun.

    12. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      War crimes. Breaking of Law. The true cost of war.

      Chelsea's first data was the collateral murder video - showing the slaying of civilians. A war crime.

      The US Military lied to the news organisation who had their reporters killed in the attack - hiding the evidence - instead of providing it as they were legally required to do so.

      True cost of war - the afghan war logs show the true civilian casualty count, and exposed the activity of death squads 'task force 373' the US was operating.

      Maybe turn off the TV and stop reading the newspapers - you're misinformed.

    13. Re:Yay! by Phusion · · Score: 1

      True that! I'm so glad she's finally getting out. Hopefully she will have adjusted enough in a few weeks to make some kind of statement/appearance.

      --
      640k ought to be enough for anyone.
    14. Re: Yay! by cayenne8 · · Score: 0

      SHE fuckface, she's a she. I don't care if you don't like it or don't agree (being a fuckface and all) but use the correct pronoun.

      How about we compromise and use the pronoun IT..?

      ;)

      You can call a turd a gold bar all you want, but at the end of the day, it is still a turd.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    15. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can call a turd a gold bar all you want, but at the end of the day, it is still a turd.

      Yes, yes you are.

    16. Re: Yay! by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Dumping cargo into the bay is not treason. Illegal, but not treason.

      Damaging property of the Crown and going against the explicit orders or the representative of the Crown was viewed as treason, even by those doing it. Dressing as non-citizen Mohawk warriors made it even clearer that this was treason. Donning war garments not of your own country is pretty much the archetypical definition of treason.
      Governor Thomas Hutchinson called it high treason, and in England, several of the leaders were charged with treason, but as they never were brought to England for trial, and thus not convicted (nor cleared) of the charge. But it was clearly meant as a "We've committed treason, now what are you going to do about it, fucker?"

    17. Re: Yay! by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Dumping cargo into the bay is not treason. Illegal, but not treason.

      By our current standards as written in the US constitution. I will bet you that treason got clarified in our constitution as what it is because it was applied to all sorts of behavior previously.

    18. Re: Yay! by Rei · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If I took a sword to a blacksmith and he beat it into a ploughshare, would you insist on calling it a sword because it once was one?

      In short, do you make an "immutability of essence" argument with everything, or just gender?

      If you see gender as an immutable binary, I strongly recommend learning about the amazing diversity of intermediary intersex forms which occur surprisingly commonly in humans. Humanity tends toward the binary, but it's fully capable of everything in-between. I also recommend that you learn about tissue homologues.

      Lastly, how exactly does what's in one's pants affect your everyday interaction with them, and thus define how you should treat them? And should what's in their pants define your interaction with them?

      --
      FSB hits! FSB hits! Your democracy dies. Do you want your possessions identified?
    19. Re: Yay! by Rei · · Score: 1

      Funny, I only see people obsessing over Jenner's involvement in the multiple vehicle collision that killed Howe (which police did not file charges over) because of her trans status. Had Jenner not been trans, very few people would even be aware of the accident and virtually nobody would be talking about it today.

      --
      FSB hits! FSB hits! Your democracy dies. Do you want your possessions identified?
    20. Re: Yay! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Had Jenner not been trans, very few people would even be aware of the accident and virtually nobody would be talking about it today.

      You're right, no one would be talking about it now, he'd have been in jail.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    21. Re: Yay! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      f you see gender as an immutable binary, I strongly recommend learning about the amazing diversity of intermediary intersex forms which occur surprisingly commonly in humans.

      ??

      What exactly is the mumbo-jumbo you're trying to express here?

      If you are XY you're male...if XX you're female. If you can't get it in your brain which one you are, then get some psychiatric help, but it doesn't change who you are.

      If you have an extra X or Y rolling around in there, ok, I'll give it to you...you are kinda fucked as to what you are, but that's definitely not the majority of cases here.

      If chelsea or whatever its name is has an extra X or Y floating around in there, please let me know...I've not heard of evidence of that.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    22. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I took a sword to a blacksmith and he beat it into a ploughshare, would you insist on calling it a sword because it once was one?

      In short, do you make an "immutability of essence" argument with everything, or just gender?

      It may be a ploughshare now instead of a sword, but it's still made of iron, not copper.

    23. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DNA of the sword would still have xy chromosones.

    24. Re:Yay! by DulcetTone · · Score: 1

      Indeed... what right thing? Manning released 750,000 classified documents. Are we to believe she knew the totality of what she was handing over? An honest consideration of this makes it difficult to defend the release of information on moral grounds. You can't point to a subset of those items whose release you find acceptable and then blanket pardon the entire shotgun betrayal. She didn't simply expose uncomfortable rules of engagement for Apache helicopters... she shat upon US interests in the general sense.

      --
      tone
    25. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here we have another perfect transphobic asshole...

    26. Re: Yay! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      This is iffy. Manning did not know what the information actually was. It was a quick download of everything that would fit, then handed to wikileaks without doing any vetting.

    27. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 'he' not 'her.' Sorry, but fantasy != reality.

    28. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The opposition to the Crown's taxes, that could be seen even more as the treason. The tea was owned by the Trading Company, after all. The opposition to the taxes had been going on for years at that point. Ironically some people think that the US flag was inspired by the East-Indian Trading Company flag. World is and was indeed a murky and gray place occasionally.

    29. Re: Yay! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What exactly is the mumbo-jumbo you're trying to express here?

      None. Your Mumbo jumbo masquerading as simple logic is still mumbo jumbo.

      If you are XY you're male...if XX you're female.

      These are the rules of biology:
      1. If you think it's simple, you're wrong
      2. If you think it's complicated, you're still wrong.
      3. If you think it's ludicrously messy and complicated, you're wrong, but getting there.

      Since you are making pseudo biological arguments, I shall respond with biological arguments.

      Go Google "androgen insensitivity syndrome".

      I'll wait.

      OK now you've read it, do you believe that someone work XY chromosomes, but entirely female anatomy since birth is male or female? And why do you choose the choice you made?

      Follow up questions: what is your definition of gender that actually matches biology I a way that's neither circular nor unique to humans?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    30. Re: Yay! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      The tea was owned by the Trading Company, after all.

      The East India Company went under British Parliament sovereignty and control earlier in 1773, so it's a somewhat moot distinction.
      But yes, taxes was indeed one of the justifications used, in particular the slogan "taxation without representation is tyranny", although some of the leaders like Sam Adams had pledged to oppose the trade monopoly and control by the Crown even if taxes were at zero. In loyalist eyes, he was certainly considered a traitor.

    31. Re: Yay! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I would ask you to also stop reading unverified blogs as well.

      Most of the stuff uncovered isn't as much war crimes, but more of bad PR. The real debate isn't what America did, but why was so much of this classified, where most of the content isn't classified worthy.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    32. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sex is between your legs.

      Your gender is between your ears.

      People and penguins are complicated.

    33. Re: Yay! by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Helping to expose corruption, deeply unethical behavior and widespread human rights violations.

      And that of course is why Juliane Assange so hates Hillary Clinton; we should of course thank Chelsey Manning for being so instrumental in getting Donald Trump elected and saving us from the horrors of another Clinton Presidency.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    34. Re: Yay! by budgenator · · Score: 0

      Don't worry s/he gets the breast implants, they're relatively cheap. Getting the penis converted into a vagina, that's expensive. Most resort to prostitution to fund it, but eventually they get busted. Having a penis means you go to a men's jail or prison, having tits in a men's jail or prison is hard on the anal sphincter and it's own punishment.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    35. Re: Yay! by budgenator · · Score: 1

      When you get your security clearance, you are specifically advised that the unauthorized dissemination of classified information or material to unauthorized persons is considered treason, and the contract you sign acknowledges that.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    36. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I took a steel sword to a blacksmith and he beat it into a plowshare, it would still be steel..not cast iron or bronze. You need to separate your idea of external appearance from the physical definition of things. Male or Female can be determined by a medical/DNA test. Maybe man or woman depends on what you have dangling where, but gender is a medical thing.

    37. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Due, look at birds. Most, especially exotics, are very difficult to tell gender by appearance. But there is a DNA test for it. In fact I'm going to bet that is true for all mammals. I'm sure there are outliers in things like some fish, insects and slugs....and there are hermaphrodites...and spontaneous reproduction...but I bet even then there is a DNA test that could identify the primary gender.

      I'd be happy if you can point to something that proves me wrong, I love learning new trivia.

      And for the record, I don't really care how you want to dress or act. I think they should solve the whole problem by stopping all segregation and double standards, but hey I'm a guy so it having a bunch of women in my bathroom isn't going to make it any more gross or smell any worse.

    38. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are few things in biology that are nearly as absolute as the rule that, in humans, XX is female and XY is male. There are rare, rare exceptions - you quoted androgen insensitivity syndrome, which has an incidence of about 1 in 40,000 births - but let's not pretend that any significant fraction of sufferers of gender dysphoria are, biologically, anything other than a clearly-defined male or female.

    39. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I took a sword to a blacksmith and he beat it into a ploughshare, would you insist on calling it a sword because it once was one?

      If I took my sword to a blacksmith and he beat it into a scabbard, I'd be like LOL MANNING!

      Also I would rinse the scabbard.

    40. Re: Yay! by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      While there are borderline cases (human genetic code puts the worst imaginable Visual Basic spaghetti code to shame, it's that buggy), Manning was and is clearly a man. Has XY chromosomes, full set of male equipment, and so on. The only issues he has are mental.

      And until he actually changes his gender (current technology to do so is iffy at best), he remains a man.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    41. Re: Yay! by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      The point is that the way he handled it was quite cowardly. He was trying to blame another woman he hit for the whole accident just because she had no license, even though he caused the whole thing.

      Nonetheless, the media labels him a hero.

    42. Re: Yay! by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Um, ..ok. But we're talking about the Boston Tea Party and the like and what the English considered treason. For this conversation, nobody is debating that what Chelsea Manning did was treason which seems to be what you are discussing. Perhaps you hit Reply in the wrong conversation?

    43. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, "Rei" on Slashdot posts some plaintext purporting to be some kind of chatroom log from Manning? It absolutely positively has to be true.

    44. Re: Yay! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Don't worry s/he gets the breast implants, they're relatively cheap. Getting the penis converted into a vagina, that's expensive.

      Hey, its a free country and if you wanna turn yourself into a freak show surgically...more power to ya.

      I just don't think the taxpayers should have to PAY for it....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    45. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are XY you're male...if XX you're female. If you can't get it in your brain which one you are, then get some psychiatric help, but it doesn't change who you are.

      For the first 3 weeks of your existence, exactly *none* of the Y chromosome is expressed, and the body in development has only female characteristics. For everyone, XX or XY.

      After those 3 weeks, as the Y chromosome begins retroactively patching your DNA, it takes up to 4 additional weeks to fully become expressed.

      If *anything* goes wrong with the protein expression during that time, your transformation from female to male can become broken and result in countless physical forms by the time you are actually born.

      As one example, the penis can begin to form, while the vagina and uterus never retract and go away, testicles never form, and the DNA is encoded to express much more estrogen than testosterone.
      In this case, this person who has a Y chromosome and a partial penis that can't ejaculate, also has a vagina, female breasts that lactate, and fully functional uterus along with viable eggs, capable of becoming impregnated and giving birth to another child.

      Yet you still label this person as purely male?

      Hate to break it to you, but males don't give birth to children, and females do not have a penis.

    46. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys act like everyone is eaten up with androgen insensitivity syndrome. It's rare. In that occasion let that person choose. Everybody that wants reassignment surgery doesn't fall into that category.

    47. Re: Yay! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Manning was and is clearly a man. Has XY chromosomes, full set of male equipment, and so on.

      I love the combination of absolute certainty and imprecision. Go on, what IS that "and so on"? I'll bet you didn't write it because after writing it your argument will fall apart. The thing is what you have actually written is in fact a circular argument. You are defining "man" as someone who has (a) typical XY chromosomes and (b) was born with readily identifies male genitals.

      The trouble with that is it doesn't work. In order to correctly use personal pronouns, not only do you require a genetic test, but also a full medical history. Do you demand such things whenever you encounter someone and want to use "he" or "she" as words? Or, do you actually have a somewhat different definition of "man" and "woman" that you actually use in practice every day?

      You're also really obsessed with genetics. On that note:

      The only issues he has are mental.

      The brain is part of biology.

      https://www.scientificamerican...

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    48. Re: Yay! by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Manning was and is clearly a man. Has XY chromosomes, full set of male equipment, and so on.

      I love the combination of absolute certainty and imprecision.

      Every single remaining physical characteristic that differ between men and women. All he has towards feminity is his delusion.

      Dressing up as a doctor doesn't make you one, neither does claiming you're one.

      The only issues he has are mental.

      The brain is part of biology.

      That you can be sold a computer advertised as a "Windows" vs "Mac" one, doesn't make software a part of hardware. And Manning has 100% male hardware.

      That's he's one of biggest heroes of this generation, doesn't make him any less delusional. And what's remarkable, unlike most people doing things out of conviction, his delusion is completely orthogonal to his heroic deed.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    49. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a point, but this "treason" was irrational enough even he/she had no great reason but mere impulse and no idea what it was about, cost at least 5 lives as heroes tried desparately to find and rescue he/she, gave comfort to some truly not nice people, cost us immeasurably as we released a bunch of terrorist leaders ready to resume killing anyone they don't like (and they hardly like anyone) ... well, you could continue this narrative

    50. Re: Yay! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      All he has towards feminity is his brain.

      FTFY.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    51. Re: Yay! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The killing of civilians as part of military operations is not a war crime per se. The laws of war recognize that people get killed in war zones, and that collateral damage and death occur. IIRC, the video shows people who presented an apparent threat in a war zone. That's unfortunate.

      The US military is not legally required to provide anything the media might want.

      Try to inform yourself on these things.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    52. Re: Yay! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Simple dissemination of classified material to an unauthorized person isn't treason, and a contract that goes against the Constitution is worthless.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    53. Re: Yay! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Every single remaining physical characteristic that differ between men and women.

      Well I win the bet that you wouldn't actually name one. The trouble is we both know just about every characteristic that differs differs inn trends only. Men tend to be heavier, tend to be hairier etc, but it's only averages.

      Dressing up as a doctor doesn't make you one, neither does claiming you're one.

      Good-o. I see you've reached the "making up lied about your opponent" stage of the debate. Pretty sure that means you've lost by default.

      . And Manning has 100% male hardware.

      So? You can be XY with 100% female hardware. And you know you can have a case mod so good that is no longer recognisable as as a mac or whatever.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    54. Re:Yay! by Methadras · · Score: 1

      Trump gets vilified for sharing terrorist information with the Russians. Something Obama and Bush also did in the past, but Manning is lauded as a brave hero for releasing classified information because transgenderism and a phony understanding of what being a traitor means. In short, the left is filled with moronic lunatics that don't have an iota of understanding of how the real world works and apply false pretenses of righteousness to wholly horrible people for all the wrong reasons.

    55. Re: Yay! by Methadras · · Score: 1

      Biology is simple. XX XY sometimes a mutation of a partial combination of the two into three or parts of the two. Male/Female at the basis of it all. Even hermaphrodites are both male and female. There are no other genders. The notion is stupid, silly, and a whimsical fantasy for those that want to be different, but can't escape the prisons of their own minds.

    56. Re: Yay! by Methadras · · Score: 1

      Don't confuse treason with rebellion.

    57. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A better analogy would be : If I take a plowshare, tape some aluminum foil on it to make it look like a sword, and place it in a sword sheath, is it still a plowshare?
      yes. yes it is.

    58. Re: Yay! by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      It seemed to be a combination of his transition AND celebrity. But the transition was fueling the celebrity enormously.
      In the end, wealth/celebrity often equals a get out of jail free card.

    59. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are ignorant of the diversity.
      What if you have Klinefelter syndrome? This means you have 3 "sex" chromosomes, XXY?

      What if you have XY gonadal dysgenesis? You outwardly have female genitals, your gonad never developed into testicles or ovaries.

      Gender identity isn't solely based on the presence of a Y chromosome or not. Your simple understanding of genetics falls far short of the complexity of gender identity

      Hint if you think it is the Y chromosome that makes males males then watch out because evolution is withering the Y chromosome away to nothing. https://phys.org/news/2009-07-male-sex-chromosome-genes-rapid.html
      "Male" traits aren't only coded on the Y chromosome.

    60. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is iffy about wars a superpower is waging over natural resources outside their homeland?

    61. Re: Yay! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Biology is simple.

      No it's not. If you think that, you've clearly never done any biology research, and your understanding is limited to more or less school level textbooks, and most likely out of date ones at that. Biology is horrendously awfully complex.

      XX XY sometimes a mutation of a partial combination of the two into three or parts of the two.

      And you didn't even mention the SRY gene. Tell me, what would you expect of an XY person with an SRY mutation?

      Even hermaphrodites are both male and female.

      Well, that kinda supportsthe point that you can't simply assign people the category of "male" or "female" based on an excessively simplistic look at their chromosomes. You at least have to have 3 categories, like male, female and hemaphoradite. And once you have that, then what else do you need? What do you call a person who has completely typical female anatomy and an XY pair?

      So what do you call a kid with what appears to be typical female anatomy? Then what do you call then when they develop what appears to be typical male anatomy during puberty?

      Seems like there's plenty of exceptions. So, why then rule out one where someone's brain tells them at something at odds with their anatomy? It's not like the brain is an important part of humans...

      There are no other genders.

      I'm not sure what you're arguing now. We were talking about transgenderism, not particularly anything about non binary gender forms. Which are you railing against?

      The notion is stupid, silly, and a whimsical fantasy for those that want to be different, but can't

      Still not getting your point. So far the only concrete thing is you seem to think biology, psychology and humans in general are somehow simple. That's laughable.

      escape the prisons of their own minds.

      I imagine you saying "it is a prison for your mind" in Lawrence Fishburn's voice.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    62. Re: Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Biology is simple.

      No, it's not. Thanks for demonstrating that you have no idea what you're talking about.

  3. Transgender by 110010001000 · · Score: 0, Troll

    As a transgender woman who lives in Silicon Valley and earns $55k in IT support, I wish her well.

    1. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which breasts size did you choose?

    2. Re:Transgender by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Cute!

    3. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "is only doing this to get away with his anti-American traitorous actions."

      Treason? 'Helping to expose corruption, deeply unethical behavior and widespread human rights violations.

    4. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of your haters here are likely obese, permanently Cheeto-stained neckbeards who haven't touched a vagina since the day they were born.

    5. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get educated. Treason is a very specific crime and Manning didn't commit treason.

    6. Re:Transgender by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1) When did you do a DNA test? Because there's plenty of people who are anatomically male who are XX, and anatomically female who are XY. Odds are high that she's XY, but there's certainly no guarantee. You cannot simply assert "she's XY" as a fact without a test.

      2) Is that how you interact with people - going around insisting on DNA tests with them before you can figure out how to proceed? And if so, do you demand DNA tests only for just sex chromosomes (or just the gene SRY), or do you insist on other DNA tests first as well?

      3) Why do you care so much what's in her pants? It's a bit creepy, as if you have some sort of sexual obsession with her. Who thinks about other peoples' genitals this much, apart from someone with a sexual fixation?

      --
      FSB hits! FSB hits! Your democracy dies. Do you want your possessions identified?
    7. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a transgender woman who lives in Silicon Valley and earns $55k in IT support, I wish her well.

      You identify as transgender in your head.... Technically, your DNA puts your body in one of two genders...

    8. Re:Transgender by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Jesus Christ... just how many trans haters are there on this site?

    9. Re:Transgender by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Slashdot is always flooded with teenagers who love to try to get a rise out of other people by posting racism, homophobia, transphobia, misogyny, etc. Plus some legitimate racists, homophobes, transphobes, misogynists, etc, but a large portion are just immature kids.

      --
      FSB hits! FSB hits! Your democracy dies. Do you want your possessions identified?
    10. Re:Transgender by arth1 · · Score: 2

      You identify as transgender in your head.... Technically, your DNA puts your body in one of two genders...

      You confuse gender with sex. Your sex is which dangly bits you popped out with, and is controlled by which chromosomes you have.
      Your gender is an identity, and has a more complex control, likely related to a combination of genes on non-sex chromosomes as well as environment.
      These days, you can change your sex (more or less successfully) without changing your gender or DNA.

    11. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the hate? I see pity, disgust, and most of all, incredulity.

    12. Re:Transgender by dskoll · · Score: 1, Troll

      Lots, because the nerds are angry that trans women get to look at boobies any time they want. Just drives them crazy.

    13. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you talking about Creimer?

    14. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) When did you do a DNA test? Because there's plenty of people who are anatomically male who are XX, and anatomically female who are XY. Odds are high that she's XY, but there's certainly no guarantee.

      Plenty? I don't think so. Such a condition is rare.

    15. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your point dude?

      Here's an experiment: Submit your DNA sample to 23andme. Let's see if you show up as female or male.

      I'm sorry: You're not a "woman" -- you're a dude who dresses as a woman and may or may not have removed your genitals. And neither is Bradley Manning. He's just a dude with no dick.

    16. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a transgender woman who lives in Silicon Valley

      A tranny in California? People always ask why I refuse any sort of travel to California. This is one more data point for my argument of why California is an alien place best avoided. So thank you for strengthening my argument.

    17. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get easily confused don't you and then confuse your confusion thinking you have it all straight.

    18. Re:Transgender by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

      Intersex conditions (of which chromosomal reversals are a type) are surprisingly common. For example, genital anomalies occur in 1 in 300 births, with outright ambiguous genitalia in 1 in 5000. Estimates of rates of intersex conditions including non-visible traits are as high as 1-2% of the global population - about the same rate as red hair. Some conditions are rare in the general population but high in specific groups - for example, 0.3% of Yupik children are born with congenital adrenal hyperplasia, while 5-ARD (a curious condition where children are born seemingly as female but develop a penis and descended testes at puberty) is very rare globally but higher in the Dominican Republic - in one village 12 of the 13 families there had at least one child with the condition.

      Males with XX and females with XY are just another in a long line of sex chromosomal abnormalities including XXY females, XXXX females, XXYY males (1 in 18-40k),XXXXX females, XXXXY males (1 in 85-100k), XXY males (1 in 500-1000), XXX females (1 in 1000), and XO females (1 in 2-5k). And it's not just changes in numbers or selections of chromosomes; the SRY gene (which is really the virilization cascade trigger, not the whole Y chromosome) seems unusually prone to migration.

      So again: if you want to assert that Manning is XY: show us the lab results. You can say it's most probable that Manning is XY and get no contest from me. But chromosomal abnormalities are common enough to make arbitrary assertion of the claim as fact indefensible.

      --
      FSB hits! FSB hits! Your democracy dies. Do you want your possessions identified?
    19. Re:Transgender by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who thinks about other peoples' genitals this much, apart from someone with a sexual fixation?

      People suffering from transphobia - a fear that they might find someone attractive but then later discover that they have the "wrong" genitals, resulting in deep shame and disgust. That's why the traditional portrayal of transgender people in movies and on TV is for a guy to date a hot trans woman, discover she has a penis and then throw up.

      It's as if being attracted to someone, loving someone, is wrong and disgusting if you can't also insert your penis in your preferred hole. There are also a bizarre panic over theoretical fake trans woman rapists in bathrooms, let's not forget that.

      The risk of this happening is apparently great enough (in their minds) to warrant all sorts of oppression and general asshattery.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re:Transgender by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'd love to know what the shared user base between 4chan and Slashdot is. Including user names, for top kek, lad.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    21. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't overlook the sock puppets that infest every site of influence on the internet - Slashdot is pretty much THE tech geek site. Distracting from the value of Manning's leaks by creating Hate (and building that emotional barrier to interpreting any information that comes out that is attributed to her) is the same old trick that's been used for time immemorial.

      Besides the anonymous puppets, there's the less anonymous ones that are also here trying to downplay/divert every discussion on the surveillance behavior and/or responsibility of the intelligence community when things that affect technology occur due to their stupid decisions.

    22. Re:Transgender by wasteoid · · Score: 1

      It is not an obsession with someone else's genitalia but an aversion to join in the peer-pressured delusion.

      No different than Rachel Dolezal claiming to be black. No matter how much she frizzes her hair or tans in a tanning bed, she is not nor will ever be black.

      Reluctance or refusal to participate in someone else's delusion doesn't mean people are automatically -phobes.

      We should all treat other people with respect, as we are all human beings. Just as transgender people should be respected for living their lives however they want, other people should be respected by allowing them to have their own thoughts without fear of reprisal.

    23. Re:Transgender by yodleboy · · Score: 2

      what is 4chan? do they have a newsletter i can subscribe to?

      If there are large numbers of 4chan users here, they are impressively restrained...

    24. Re:Transgender by TangoMargarine · · Score: 2

      Intersex conditions (of which chromosomal reversals are a type) are surprisingly common. For example, genital anomalies occur in 1 in 300 births

      You have a very lenient definition of "common." 0.33% is not common.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    25. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the panic is more over a potential molester posing as a woman when he's a guy, and then going into the womens bathroom, and spying on them (or worse).

      I would imagine transgender would just prefer to be left alone, regardless of what bathroom. They aren't the problem.

    26. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) When did you do a DNA test? Because there's plenty of people who are anatomically male who are XX, and anatomically female who are XY. Odds are high that she's XY, but there's certainly no guarantee. You cannot simply assert "she's XY" as a fact without a test.

      2) Is that how you interact with people - going around insisting on DNA tests with them before you can figure out how to proceed? And if so, do you demand DNA tests only for just sex chromosomes (or just the gene SRY), or do you insist on other DNA tests first as well?

      3) Why do you care so much what's in her pants? It's a bit creepy, as if you have some sort of sexual obsession with her. Who thinks about other peoples' genitals this much, apart from someone with a sexual fixation?

      You protest far too much. The discussion is not about random person Erin coming out and announcing their gender identity. It is about someone that upon facing enormous legal charges and political pressures in highly politicized case, changing their gender in the midst of the proceedings. Some skepticism regarding the motives isn't transphobia, it's good common sense. Odd's aren't very good that this was a sudden realization that hit them when everything blew up, but in a politicized case like this, there was unquestionably potential advantage to be had too. Suddenly gaining the backing of a large section of activists in the country can't hurt.

    27. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) There is also no guarantee that atheism is right or that Christians are right

      Yes there is. Atheism is right, that's guaranteed. Just read the Bible and think a bit about it, it's not hard to figure out.

    28. Re:Transgender by Megol · · Score: 1

      I've known people that thought transsexuals were homosexual males that tried to lure poor straight people to have sex with them as a kind of planned gayification. Now if they had been idiots without any logical ability it could be accepted as yet another crazy idea... But they weren't idiots. Well, not in other aspects.

    29. Re:Transgender by butzwonker · · Score: 1

      It used to be different. :(

    30. Re:Transgender by swillden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Intersex conditions (of which chromosomal reversals are a type) are surprisingly common. For example, genital anomalies occur in 1 in 300 births

      You have a very lenient definition of "common." 0.33% is not common.

      He didn't say they're common. He said they're surprisingly common, which means they're more common that you might expect, not that they're common in any absolute sense (whatever that means, anyway).

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    31. Re:Transgender by Megol · · Score: 1

      Well I've been known to frequent /b in the past. It isn't as good anymore but as we all know /b/ was never good...

    32. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you ever stop trolling? give it a rest.

    33. Re: Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange what experience teaches people

    34. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. More like slashdot attracts people who don't like being told they must help reenforce the delusions of others. I'd expect to see a lot of that from tech people who view things more objectively than the average.

      People are welcome to have bodymod operations and pump themselves full of hormones, but they're never going to be the real deal, nor should they expect others to treat them as such, up to, and including finding them attractive as mates.

    35. Re: Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It used to not matter. But agenda pushers started drawing lines and insisting they be recognized.

    36. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. It's about tyrants like you telling everyone else what to think, say, and feel, about other people. If someone's throwing up over it, it's likely a deeply rooted natural reaction, you know, like how you say dysphoria is totally natural.

    37. Re:Transgender by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, as you can see here, there are plenty of people who hate us because of what we are, and not who we are. It's no different than hating on someone because of their skin colour, and one day it will be seen that way - ignorant bigotry. Fortunately, the majority is now on our side, and that's got to be a major burn.

      She's going to be okay, if her past performance is any indication at all. She's got more guts, spunk, and resiliency than the people throwing rocks, and in the back of their minds they know it.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    38. Re:Transgender by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      So you're admitting that the problem isn't transsexuals in the woman's washroom, but perverted men.

      And yet your ilk wants to force men who were once women, who know pump iron, have a beard, a male voice, etc., into the woman's washrooms? Because that's the flip side of transsexual women being forced into the men's room.

      Sounds like you're the pervert here.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    39. Re:Transgender by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Women prior to puberty and after menopause can't reproduce either. And there are others, both male and female, who are sterile their whole life. And the preferred term is "woman", not "transgender woman." Same as you wouldn't refer to someone who lost their reproductive organs to cancer as "transgender."

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    40. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their troll posts are simply too stupid to take seriously. They don't even care to try any more than those "creationists" or "establishment is out to get us"-nutters in the evolution and science-related debates.

    41. Re:Transgender by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is always flooded with teenagers who love to try to get a rise out of other people by posting racism, homophobia, transphobia, misogyny, etc. Plus some legitimate racists, homophobes, transphobes, misogynists, etc, but a large portion are just immature kids.

      It wasn't always this way. When I was outed a decade ago, the vast majority were supportive. Unfortunately, most of the cool people have left, and who can blame them? These haters have attitudes decades out of date. Trying to have a logical conversation with them is like trying to reason with someone with Alzheimers who is stuck in the past. New information just doesn't stick, but in their case, it's not Alzheimers, it's willful ignorance. At least the Alzheimers folk have an excuse.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    42. Re:Transgender by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      A bone marrow transplant from a female donor will make any blood test on a male come out XX. So much for DNA.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    43. Re:Transgender by budgenator · · Score: 1

      As a transgender woman who lives in Silicon Valley and earns $55k in IT support, I wish her well.

      That's horrific, I can't imagine the challenges of living in Silicon Valley and only earning $55k; being transgender is only a minor inconvenience compared to that!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    44. Re:Transgender by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Jesus Christ... just how many trans haters are there on this site?

      They're not trans-haters, it's just that "trans" is now cool and they are oppositional/defiant. When something else is cool, they hate that instead, maybe fidget spinners will be next.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    45. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Troll

    46. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Estimates of rates of intersex conditions including non-visible traits are as high as 1-2% of the global population

      Only if you count non-standard sex chromosomes as intersex conditions. Which no reasonable person would: XXY develops as obviously male as XY, XXX as female as XX, etc. There's a reason that these are, as you put it, "non-visible": they're not intersex in any meaningful, phenotypical sense.

    47. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that what you think transphobia is? "fear of attraction, but then plot twist, and blah blah blah". That's like some tranny wet dream, isn't it? Everyone is SOOOOO ATTRACTED to me. OH, and SCARED they will be ashamed of BEING SO ATTRACTED to me. Get real, faggot.

      Here, phobia = revulsion & disgust. Not some visceral fear, and certainly not "attraction".

    48. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about a million people in the US alone.

    49. Re:Transgender by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Women prior to puberty and after menopause can't reproduce either.

      False; post-menopausal births indeed do occur. The oldest woman to give birth via IVF was nearly 67 years old.

    50. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of Slashdotters can see boobies anytime they want by looking down, Man boobies sure, but boobies nevertheless

    51. Re:Transgender by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Guess what? If she produced a viable egg, she wasn't really post-menopausal, was she? If she didn't produce the egg, she isn't the mother. Just a host or surrogate. Same as if you ever get lucky, you'll just be a sperm donor, because nobody would want to spend years raising a child with you.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    52. Re:Transgender by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Also, she had a c-section because she could NOT give birth. Tsk tsk.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    53. Re:Transgender by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Guess what? If she produced a viable egg

      Guess what? She didn't. Furthermore, menopause is reversible:

      https://www.newscientist.com/a...

      And a year later, a postmenopausal birth has occurred using the woman's own eggs:

      http://www.independent.co.uk/n...

      So go fuck yourself, Nazi asshole. Oh...my bad...you don't have genitals...Well, put a twig in your butt then.

    54. Re:Transgender by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You missed my follow-up - they did NOT give birth. They had to have c sections because they could not give birth. Idiot.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    55. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For XY females it's 1 in 80,000. It's a genetic mutation, an aberration that results not only in sterility but medical problems that are ultimately the result of a hormone deficiency. The SRY gene is mutated in 15% of the cases (in the majority of cases it is not inherited as it is a defect), it's located on the Y chromosome and provides instructions for making the sex-determining region Y protein. So these males (XY karotype) can't develop properly. The Y protein causes a fetus to develop male gonads (testes) and prevent the development of female reproductive structures (uterus and fallopian tubes) which is the default. So if it's not functional or missing you get an XY (male) with female sexual organs. The uterus and fallopian tubes are normally-formed, but the gonads (ovaries or testes) are not functional. The affected individuals have undeveloped clumps of tissue called streak gonads. Because they do not have functional ovaries, affected individuals usually begin hormone replacement therapy during adolescence to induce menstruation and development of female secondary sex characteristics such as breast enlargement and uterine growth. Hormone replacement therapy also helps reduce the risk of reduced bone density (osteopenia and osteoporosis). Individuals with this disorder do not produce eggs (ova), but they may be able to become pregnant with a donated egg or embryo. Hormones during pregnancy can also cause this condition as well as other environmental factors such as defective eggs or sperm where the defects occur during their development and the embryo produced is still viable.

      XX males have a mutation where the gene for the Y protein crosses over to the X chromosome. This happens in 4 out of 100,000. They too are sterile/infertile.

      Why does any of this matter? Because the biological purpose of sex and mating is procreation. Evolution gives F*** All about one's gender, it only cares if you can procreate. It's about the joining of two bloodlines and genetic information to create new progenitor offspring, one that is at least as viable as the two that produced it if not more. You're right, gender doesn't matter, biological sex does, or at least sexual viability does if that is what's relevant.

      We're all a bunch of mutants in one form or another but gender expression in nature is for the purpose of sexual procreation.

    56. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A cesarean is a birth, unless you want to argue that those born of a cesarean were never born at all.

      At least, it's no more unusual than the story of how you were born, which went something like this:

      One day your mom was eating beans, and had that special feeling down there like she had to fart. After relaxing for a second, the putrid gasses sputtered their way out, but the gasses weren't alone...something unexpected also came along.

      "Oh my gosh, what is that?!" she gasped, "I think I just sharted!" she exclaimed.

      But your dad, who witnessed this disturbing event, looked a little closer. "No," he said "It's moving....I think...it's alive! What on earth did you eat?"

      "Just the beans!" your mother cried.

      "It almost looks like a baby...not quite...but almost." your dad retorted "But it came out of your ass, so there's no way it can be a baby."

      Then, before you even had the chance to open your eyes, you placed your finger up your anus and began to cry.

      "How could this happen? I don't even have any ovaries!" your mother cried.

      "We're totally screwed for the next 18 years!" your dad said with despair.

    57. Re:Transgender by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Effectively the same thing, the only difference is in the delivery. My mom was in her 20's when she gave birth to me via c-section.

      Face it dude, you are about as female as mice are rats, and that wound between your legs is as much a vulva as dentures are teeth.

    58. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not replying to any specific person here, just a related comment.

      Could the obsession be part of the god delusion, possibly? "How can my god have created a person this way when he is omniscient/omnipotent/whatever"?
      I'm damned if I know. We get a short time on this planet, some of us far less than others. Why waste that time worrying about inconsequential shit like whether a tiny percentage of people, the vast majority of whom you won't even know, are trans? And as for this Shithouse Nazi thing that seems to have taken root in the swivel-eyed group...grow the fuck up. If you're than uncomfortable, either piss at home or go in a cubicle. It's a toilet not a fucking nightclub; go in, do what you need to do, wash your hands then leave. Policing the pissers is neither required nor welcome.

    59. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      re the SRY gene being unusually prone to migration, is that possibly a bias due to visibility? Perhaps it has the same frequency of migrating chromosomes but it's extremely visible when it happens due to the unique nature of the chromosome it normally resides on?

    60. Re:Transgender by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The woman who gets a cesarean has no more "given birth" than a clone taken out of a tank would be (and we've come a ways on that). If ANYONE "gave birth" to the child, is was the medical team who performed the cesarean;. The woman was incapable of giving birth. So while the child was given birth, it was by the doctors, not the woman. The child would have died before birth otherwise, and you can hardly call pushing out a corpse "giving birth."

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    61. Re:Transgender by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Not the same thing. Your mother didn't give you birth - the surgeon did. Your mother would have most likely produced a dead fetus - hence the c-section.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    62. Re:Transgender by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I miss the old days, when I didn't have to go through a full genetic workup to take a leak.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    63. Re:Transgender by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      0.33% of the US population is about a million people.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    64. Re:Transgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a personal level, while I may find the whole Transgender thing to be a mental aberration as opposed to an acceptable thing, I'm also uncomfortable with the hate being thrown at people.
      I don't like to insult people or belittle them, even if I believe they're wrong. I don't like people who do.
      If I run into a guy with an enormous inoperable cancer on his face, I would both find it a defect AND not stand there pointing at it, calling him names, and making him feel stupid.

    65. Re:Transgender by JamesKeane7745 · · Score: 1

      We all know who is the triggered one here, little coward. Probably the one reaching for shift-8 to act big :)

    66. Re:Transgender by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      "You cannot moderate a thread that you've commented in" so here's a virtual +1 Funny, +1 Insightful, and +1 Lulz.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  4. She did the right thing by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Manning discovered widespread corruption, deeply unethical behavior and absolutely unacceptable conduct, and she decided to let fundamental human rights and dignity overrule artificial power structures, so she exposed the lies, and of course the liars punished her.

    It must have taken immense bravery, and we should admire her, not attack her.

    --
    Eat the rich.
    1. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, in many cases "top secret" and the threat of treason charges are used by those in power to cover up personal incompetence and/or criminal activities.

    2. Re:She did the right thing by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      My understanding is that it was in fact her duty. Something in the oath she took about defending against threats to the United States, foreign and domestic.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:She did the right thing by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Informative

      No she didn't. Wikileaks did. She just dumped a whole load of files on them with no way of knowing if there was anything that exposed criminal actions, or how responsible wikileaks would be.

      There was no deeply unethical behaviour 99% of what was given to wikileaks.

    4. Re:She did the right thing by loonycyborg · · Score: 0

      We should get used to always using genderless pronouns (singular "them") to refer to people because soon people will be changing genders so often that notion of gender will be obsolete. I admire the bravery of mr(s) Manning and hope all will work out well for them.

    5. Re:She did the right thing by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have to agree. There's a big difference between leaking, and dumping troves of information. It could have been bad.

      Fortunately it was nowhere near as bad as people were claiming at the time. None of the revelations were really that shocking except to people who were naive about war or diplomacy.

      In a way the most shocking thing was the sheer breadth of information that was made available to a young person who was disturbed, alienated and psychologically vulnerable. Granted screening for people like that is never going to be perfect, but it's almost like they weren't even trying.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Singular "them" causes misunderstandings almost every time it's forced into a sentence. I personally think it would be much better to simply abandon the gender significance in existing pronounce (i.e. make "she" and "he" interchangeable) because indicating gender with pronouns isn't particularly useful anyway.

    7. Re:She did the right thing by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 0

      Manning discovered widespread corruption, deeply unethical behavior and absolutely unacceptable conduct, and she decided to let fundamental human rights and dignity overrule artificial power structures, so she exposed the lies, and of course the liars punished her.

      It must have taken immense bravery, and we should admire her, not attack her.

      He did none of those things. He dumped data without even knowing what was on it because he had issue with the fact there was too much to sift through to find anything juicy while being ignorant of what he was looking for, and happened to be an attention whore to boot.

    8. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, in many cases "top secret" and the threat of treason charges are used by those in power to cover up personal incompetence and/or criminal activities.

      Do you have any proof of this? Even the stuff Manning exposed didn't show anything like this...

    9. Re:She did the right thing by bobbied · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My understanding is that it was in fact her duty. Something in the oath she took about defending against threats to the United States, foreign and domestic.

      Yet Manning signed a non-disclosure agreement which Manning decided didn't apply. In the process Manning exposed classified information about methods and collection activities which gave the USA's adversaries the ability to avoid collection and may have cost the lives of human assets involved in the collections. Manning also caused grave damage to international relations....

      So I have a question... What was the big story yesterday about Trump and the meeting with the Russians all about? How are they similar?

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    10. Re:She did the right thing by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      We're not allowed to say things like that because it exposes that Manning is potentially the same kind of person as Cosmo or whatever they're calling themselves now: a mentally-imbalanced individual with severe cognitive and emotional control problems due to unaddressed psychiatric issues.

      GID is generally handled by gender reassignment. That's usually mostly-benign, although there's a lot of social stress that's secondary. GID is frequently comorbid with serious psychiatric disturbances that look an awful damned lot like schizophrenia or schyzotypical personality disorder.

      It's theoretically possible for a schizotypal to manifest their paranoid delusions as GID, along with a belief that Obama is plotting to lead the Muslim invasion from the secret military installation under Denver Airport and implement Shariah Law in the US, and that FEMA has coffins everywhere to put the bodies when they release the plague and kill off 99% of the US population so they can herd the rest into concentration camps for forced labor. Nobody talks publicly about that because identifying a subset of GID cases as downstream from blunt insanity is impolitic.

      So yeah, everyone is going to laud this person as some kind of immaculate hero because it's not stylish to do otherwise.

    11. Re:She did the right thing by ls671 · · Score: 1

      I find it convenient to know if you invite me to meet your sister.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    12. Re:She did the right thing by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yet Manning signed a non-disclosure agreement which Manning decided didn't apply.

      Oaths supersede signed agreements.

    13. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was the big story yesterday about Trump and the meeting with the Russians all about? How are they similar?

      They're not similar. Trump still has his dick.

    14. Re:She did the right thing by bobbied · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only if one is willing to ADMIT to what they did and pay the price, but you do it within the system FIRST. Manning didn't do it the right way, he went rouge bypassed the system and broke the law AND his oath in my view. It was double bad that he was enlisted in the military at the time. You CANNOT refuse an order in the military unless it is CLEARLY unlawful, Manning disobeyed lawful orders, violated his oath, violated the law, and arguably committed treason while in uniform.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    15. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should get used to always using genderless pronouns

      Stopped reading right there. Sorry, but the idea of proper classification is important. We're not going to throw it away in some stupid and misguided attempt at feminazism. Now if you want to change the rules of what category we use go right ahead and propose them. (I.e. Based on identified / preferred gender, etc.) But we need the gender classification otherwise it becomes more difficult to categorize other things (No, A dress is not unisex.), and people. (No not this it, that it. Which it? IT!!!!!)

      notion of gender will be obsolete

      Then what was the point of the gender transition? If you are going to change gender, chances are it's not for procreation (yet), so then isn't the only other reason to do so, is to change the perceptions of others? If the notion of gender is rendered obsolete, then isn't the modern practice of changing genders rendered pointless? At that point every one is treated the same regardless as to the position of your sexual organs, and as such there wouldn't be any social benefit to changing gender except personal preference. (Which until the process is more complete, (I.e. the body doesn't just look / sound whatever gender you want it to) is only a mental comfort.)

      Disclaimer: I mean no disrespect to transgendered people. I'm sure there are plenty of ways that I haven't thought of that a sex change can be beneficial to those undergoing (or have undergone) them. So the following is just my opinion, from my very limited point of view.

      That's the problem with these claims. The idea of getting rid of gender classification renders the entire point of undergoing a sex change a waste of time. The whole point of a modern sex change* is to have others see and treat you the way that you believe yourself to be. Removing that classification means that whether you are a he or she, you are already treated by society the same way that you would be treated after undergoing the change, and therefore the change is unnecessary.

      *As those that do undergo a sex change cannot currently take on the biological role of the desired sex, it's not a valid reason at this time. We don't have the technology to allow for that yet. Also, insecurity of your natural gender is not a valid reason. (Actually, any legit practice would screen you out of the process if that was the case.) As a requirement of undergoing a sex change is you have already made the determination of what gender you believe yourself to be. Yes, there is a sight comfort to seeing that reflected in your physical appearance, but that's more of a societal perception conformation than anything else. If you needed the sex change to prove your belief, then you shouldn't have done the sex change yet. There are plenty of other ways to confirm that belief without undergoing something that risky. Maybe someday changing gender will be as easy, and low risk, as flicking a light switch, but that day is not today, and society does not take kindly to those who try to force them to change their minds. (Indeed one of the parts of the process for a sex change is to determine whether or not your prepared to deal with society's backlash. It's not just medical complications that can make your life difficult after a sex change after all.)

    16. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      he went rouge

      rogue dammit ROGUE

    17. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SCOTUS case?

    18. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, working within the system worked for oh NO ONE.

      most of the time, they end up in Jail, or dead.

      No - the system is broken - which is why we have the 5th estate.

    19. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are similar in that Manning did the right thing or at least believed she did so, whereas Trump is a patently stupid dumbass who constantly brags about things with which he has nothing to do (such as the work of CIA and NSA employees most of whom can't stand him like everybody else) and who can't keep his mouth shut in front of the Russian envoy. In other words, not similar at all.

    20. Re:She did the right thing by swillden · · Score: 1

      Only if one is willing to ADMIT to what they did and pay the price, but you do it within the system FIRST.

      Do you have an example of someone who successfully worked within the system?

      In the similar context of NSA malfeasance, there is abundant evidence of several other people who tried to work within the system, got hammered for it, and achieved nothing. I expect there are many such examples in the military as well, but the military is better at keeping them secret. It turns out that we need Mannings/Snowdens, because that's the only way the information gets out. I'll grant that Manning was particularly careless, and should have taken an approach similar to Snowden's, giving the information to trustworthy journalists rather than Wikileaks. But any wrongdoing was in the execution, not the basic act.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    21. Re:She did the right thing by bobbied · · Score: 1

      For examples of how this is SUPPOSED to work... Have a look at the Civil Rights movement of the 1960's. Many in that movement went though the courts, lobbied their government officials and even peacefully protested to sway public opinion, and only then did they resort to breaking the law... You keep trying.

      Your problem is you have preconceived notions about some conspiracy for which you have no proof but you strongly believe to be true. You've been amassing "evidence" to bolsterer your world view by seizing any fragment of something said or done and ascribing great importance to it and ignoring the mountains of evidence which doesn't support your belief.

      Could it possibly be that the members of the intelligence community are really trying to protect the USA and it's citizens? Could it be that having classified information is integral to maintaining that safety? If you allow either or both of these, you have to believe that what Manning did was ill advised and counterproductive at best and treason at worst.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    22. Re:She did the right thing by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Your point (apart from bashing Trump) escapes me. Perhaps you missed my point? I'll try again..

      IF what Trump said to the Russians was treason (as some claim) then what was what Manning did? Heck, how about what Hillary did with those classified E-Mails?

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    23. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he went rouge

      rogue dammit ROGUE

      In this particular case, either seems correct.

    24. Re:She did the right thing by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Manning did nothing to protect the US, the effects were the opposite. There was no uncovering of corruption or misdeeds. The most incriminating stuff was what we already knew, which was the minority of the information taken. Most of it was diplomatic cables, the release of which was harmful. Manning did not know what this information was at the time, he did the digital equivalent of stealing unopened file cabinets. He then turned that information over to wikileaks which was known to be irresponsible with sensitive information. He broke the law without even knowing what information he had stolen.

      Snowden on the other hand knew exactly what information he had, and what it implied, and it was information that was useful. He released this in a controlled manner. Snowden broke the law but he knew what he was doing and what the information meant. Snowden was a hero, Manning was an opportunist.

    25. Re:She did the right thing by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Him, not her... don't feed into that bullshit, he was born a man and will always be one, no matter what parts he cuts off.

    26. Re:She did the right thing by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      She tried working through the system first. Do your research before slandering someone.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    27. Re:She did the right thing by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      What was the big story yesterday about Trump and the meeting with the Russians all about? How are they similar?

      They're not similar. Trump still has his dick.

      Does he? It's not like he's experiencing any urge to use it - separate beds in separate dwellings, up at 3 am on Twitter instead of surfing for porn, sounds like some of his meds have made him impotent.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    28. Re:She did the right thing by swillden · · Score: 3, Informative

      For examples of how this is SUPPOSED to work... Have a look at the Civil Rights movement of the 1960's. Many in that movement went though the courts, lobbied their government officials and even peacefully protested to sway public opinion, and only then did they resort to breaking the law... You keep trying.

      Your problem is you have preconceived notions about some conspiracy for which you have no proof but you strongly believe to be true. You've been amassing "evidence" to bolsterer your world view by seizing any fragment of something said or done and ascribing great importance to it and ignoring the mountains of evidence which doesn't support your belief.

      Could it possibly be that the members of the intelligence community are really trying to protect the USA and it's citizens? Could it be that having classified information is integral to maintaining that safety? If you allow either or both of these, you have to believe that what Manning did was ill advised and counterproductive at best and treason at worst.

      For examples of how this is SUPPOSED to work... Have a look at the Civil Rights movement of the 1960's

      So, that's a no. Thanks for clearing that up.

      Also, you really need to review your history of the Civil Rights movement. It included quite a bit of lawbreaking which was necessary to raise awareness and move the issue forward. I'd say it constitutes a pretty decent counterexample to your claim, actually. But even if it didn't, the fact that you had to reach back almost 60 years to find an example of someone allegedly fixing a governmental problem through official channels is telling enough.

      Your problem is you have preconceived notions about some conspiracy for which you have no proof but you strongly believe to be true. You've been amassing "evidence" to bolsterer your world view by seizing any fragment of something said or done and ascribing great importance to it and ignoring the mountains of evidence which doesn't support your belief.

      Nonsense. You should read about John Crane, Thomas Drake and the others who were persecuted (and prosecuted) for trying to reveal what Snowden did, but to do it "the right way". The evidence is abundant and well-documented by serious journalists. This isn't some conspiracy theory crap, and if you're unaware of it it's because your own confirmation bias has led you to avoid it. Here's an article to get you started: https://www.theguardian.com/us...

      Could it possibly be that the members of the intelligence community are really trying to protect the USA and it's citizens?

      Good intentions are not a defense against bad actions. I sincerely believe that the members of the intelligence community are trying to protect the country, but that doesn't mean they can just do anything they want. There is tremendous potential for abuse, which is why we need laws that strictly circumscribe what the intelligence community can do, and real oversight -- with teeth -- to verify that the laws are being followed. We manifestly lack real oversight, and as a result the intelligence community regularly breaks the law, which itself is dangerously permissive.

      Could it be that having classified information is integral to maintaining that safety? If you allow either or both of these, you have to believe that what Manning did was ill advised and counterproductive at best and treason at worst.

      You have a very simplistic view of the world. There is more than one issue at stake. Classified information can be integral to maintaining safety, and yet it can still be necessary to reveal classified information in order to preserve freedom. In most cases this can be done without actually endangering anyone... but sometimes it can't, and that's just too damned bad. Freedom isn't free, and part of the cost

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    29. Re:She did the right thing by swillden · · Score: 1

      Oops, sorry for the double quoting. I should have looked closer before hitting submit.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    30. Re:She did the right thing by bobbied · · Score: 0

      Manning did not exhaust all possible legal channels. Neither did Manning expose any evidence of anything improper. Saying otherwise doesn't make it so. Manning was properly convicted of violating military law which is proof of what I'm saying. Yours is a Google search?

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    31. Re:She did the right thing by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Manning was legally tried and convicted under military law and rightly so. Manning broke the law. End of report.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    32. Re:She did the right thing by swillden · · Score: 1

      Manning was legally tried and convicted under military law and rightly so. Manning broke the law. End of report.

      So now you've abandoned the moral high ground and are just relying on "but it's the law!". I accept your concession.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    33. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He. Not she. He. He discovered corruption. He was brave.

    34. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither did Manning expose any evidence of anything improper. Saying otherwise doesn't make it so.

      Really? So exactly what things would you classify as improper, since for instance killing persons doing nothing but trying to rescue another wounded person (8 minutes into https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=is9sxRfU-ik) apparently falls outside of your definition of improper?

    35. Re:She did the right thing by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Oaths supersede signed agreements.

      Do you mean the oath to protect and defend the constitution, obey the law and to follow the legal orders of superior officers?

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    36. Re:She did the right thing by budgenator · · Score: 1

      In a way the most shocking thing was the sheer breadth of information that was made available to a young person who was disturbed, alienated and psychologically vulnerable. Granted screening for people like that is never going to be perfect, but it's almost like they weren't even trying.

      At the time (if memory serves me correctly) the military was under considerable pressure eliminate the "Don't ask, Don't tell" policy to something more "politically correct" and placing a person as disturbed, alienated and psychologically vulnerable as Manning was, in that position of trust is a very typical example of malicious obedience, Army style. Strictly speaking the lawful orders of Superior Officers were follow, but they were followed in a way to insure failure. Gays and Transgenders are going to have that cloud over their heads for decades now.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    37. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If defending the constitution means breaking an otherwise lawful order, then YES thats what that oath requires.

      Note1: I am a veteran and took this oath.
      Note2: I am not saying it was proscribed in this case. Just that Defending the constitution takes precedence over EVERYTHING ELSE.

    38. Re:She did the right thing by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Oh? Moral high ground? In this case, the moral high ground would have been following the law... Manning didn't do that, so has no claim to being moral. But hey, you really don't want to make this a moral argument with Manning as your poster child do you? LOL, that would be rich...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    39. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Manning discovered widespread corruption, deeply unethical behavior and absolutely unacceptable conduct, and she decided to let fundamental human rights and dignity overrule artificial power structures, so she exposed the lies, and of course the liars punished her.

      It must have taken immense bravery, and we should admire her, not attack her.

      Manning also dumped every possible document Manning could get hold of--that is criminal.

      Just a pissed off employee getting revenge on their boss.

    40. Re:She did the right thing by swillden · · Score: 1

      "moral" == "legal"? You really are simple, aren't you?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    41. Re:She did the right thing by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
      Ignore the morons - they don't know how to do simple research, just repeat the gubbiment bullshit. Just like Trump supposedly hasn't done anything improper, like try to impede an investigation or by sharing intel putting spies at risk. No wonder people are putting their money where their mouth is

      The chances have increased, according to British bookies, that President Donald Trump will leave the White House before his four-year term is over.

      The bookmakers have seen a stream of bets that Trump will depart early after a report Tuesday that he asked the since-fired FBI director James Comey to shut down a probe into links between his inner circle and Russia.

      “Overnight we’ve seen more than [£5,000] bet on Trump to leave before the end of his first term, and we expect to see a lot more bet today, with his odds now shortening from evens into 5/6,” Katie Baylis, spokeswoman at Betfair PPB, +0.95% , said in a note Wednesday morning. That implies a 55% probability that the president will exit before his term ends.

      “And many punters think it won’t be too long before he departs, with the odds of him leaving this year now into 12/5 from 11/2 — a 27% chance [up] from 16% before the latest allegations,” Baylis added.

      Later on Wednesday, Betfair said punters had bet another £13,000 that Trump will leave before the end of his first term.

      Trump, by being such a disaster, has succeeded in rehabilitating George W Bush - and odds are he'll do the same with Nixon.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    42. Re:She did the right thing by ai4px · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points today for you. Well spoken. Opportunist vs hero.

    43. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am waiting for your answer. What examples do you have of what you would classifying as improper?

    44. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand how the concept that sex and gender are two different things is so fucking hard for you and your ilk to comprehend.

    45. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I think ignoring is wrong. I want to expose flawed and invalid arguments for what they are.

    46. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the moral high ground would have been following the law

      OK, in that case, it's a crime for a woman to walk outdoors showing her face.
      It's a crime for a woman to look at or speak to another man that isn't her husband.
      It's also a crime to prevent that husband from stoning his wife to death for speaking to another man.

      The fact you argue all of those actions are moral is frankly disgusting, and says quite a lot about your character.

    47. Re:She did the right thing by bobbied · · Score: 1

      I start with the assumption that the law is morally correct until proven otherwise, even then, I follow it when I can while advocating for it's change. You see, the burden of proof falls on those who contend the law is immoral as applied and it is a MORAL requirement that you peruse the changing of the law while you follow it. Laws exist for a reason in this country and the laws about classified information and treason are necessary and valid morally from my perspective.

      I live in an HOA. I don't like their rules, but I follow them. I'm also trying to get the rules I don't like changed, while I follow them by lobbying the board to rewrite them.... See the principle?

      So is that too simple for you? Too bad.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    48. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I am really pleased to read a well written argument with a conclusion, which I do not share, but bravo for contributing to a factual debate.)

      Let's say that the HOA's board have decided that all information about the board's economical spendings are classified, and that anyone that exposes any details will be thrown out of their home.

      Then you find some papers that show that the board on several occasions have visited a strip club and spent a significant amount of HOA's money for their own pleasure there.

      Are you then going to not do anything because the rules say you are not allowed to... See the dilemma?

    49. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What big story? McMaster stated Trump said nothing that wasn't implicit in the state of the middle east conflict and even if he did as commander in chief it's his prerogative to declassify information as he sees fit when working with foreign nations. The intelligence agencies (McMaster's own office ironically) leaked the info to media simply to try and stir things up to undermine Trump. And I'm not a Trump apologist, I just recognize media and partisan BS when I see it.

    50. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am still waiting for your answer. What examples do you have of what you would classifying as improper?

    51. Re:She did the right thing by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      People have been providing reasons why Manning did what she did. Attempting to do it a legal way simply wasn't going to work, so if it was worth doing it was worth breaking the law to do. Moreover, laws aren't perfect, and breaking one for a good reason doesn't mean the law should be changed.

      Suppose the HOA rules called for you to do something you think immoral, and you were sure that you couldn't get that rule changed. Then what?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    52. Re:She did the right thing by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Snowden released a lot of information, some pertaining to internal spying and some pertaining to external. He pretty much handed it over to journalists, who published things I think should have stayed unpublished.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    53. Re:She did the right thing by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Seriously, why are you so hung up on a pronoun for Manning? What skin is it off your nose that Manning prefers being referred to as "she"?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    54. Re:She did the right thing by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Words matter and the poor snowflakes are unwilling to call a spade a spade...

    55. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if one is willing to ADMIT to what they did and pay the price, but you do it within the system FIRST...l

      False. The 9th Amendment - part of the Bill of Rights, the highest law in the land, superseding the UCMJ and all acts of Congress in the event of any conflict - does not allow the government to pass any law to this effect. The right to long term public oversight over government is protected under the 9th Amendment and authorizes direct action irregardless of the system when the government is violating the Bill of Rights.

      If this were not the case, the government could create rules which prevented any oversight by making it impractical to work within the system (and in practice has done exactly that on many historical occasions), and thus the authority of Congress would supersede the Bill of Rights.

      Since you clearly believe that the government can violate the Bill of Rights, should I assume that you are a traitor? After all, only a traitor would think that's a good thing.

    56. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I am still waiting for your answer. What examples do you have of what you would classifying as improper?

      Why do you not answer this? Are you afraid to possibly reveal that your arguments are invalid? Is never admitting mistakes more important than being honest?

      I had higher hopes for you since you show very positive behaviour elsewhere, like writing proper arguments and in other threads you write insigtful comments. But in this thread you seem to ignore that arguments ought to be reasonable and valid. Why?

      What is the worst thing that could happen if you admit that your argument is not valid? You will not die, you will not be thrown out of your home, and none of the people you know in real life knows (or cares) about what you write here. What is the risk of possibly admitting a mistake?

    57. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A superpower waging wars to gain control of natural resources isn't deeply unethical behavior?

    58. Re:She did the right thing by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I think a few people might have already noticed that the US was doing this without the investigative skills of Wikileaks.

    59. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you care so much about someone else's genitals? That seems to be your problem, not hers.

    60. Re:She did the right thing by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I get that you disagree with the people who actually study this sort of thing, but why the vehemence? Every time this comes up, lots of people insist on emphasizing their anti-scientific opinions like they perceived it as a threat.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    61. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you have not yet answered with examples of what you would classify as improper, I can only conclude that that it is because are not a man of integrity, that you put avoiding admitting mistakes higher than being honest, and cowardly try to "escape" by ignoring the request. I am disappointed in you, I really am.

    62. Re:She did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why have you not replied yet?

  5. Obligatory Liberty Meadows by ChrisMaple · · Score: 0
    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    1. Re:Obligatory Liberty Meadows by Wootery · · Score: 1

      Spare us the 'web design': direct link to image.

    2. Re:Obligatory Liberty Meadows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that comic always this unfunny, or was this an exception?

  6. Re:Freak show by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Traitor, sexually confused, suicidal...

    Are we talking about Manning or Trump?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  7. Decent Ending, Bad Process by Jzanu · · Score: 1

    As a whistle blower bringing a program back under civil oversight, Manning did well. However, the methods used were wrong. There was never any need to seek personal fame through the media, and if proper channels had been followed there would have never been a sentence that needed to be commuted.

    1. Re:Decent Ending, Bad Process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By "proper channels", I assume you mean telling the liars that you know they are lying. That never ends well.

  8. Re:Freak show by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't be ridiculous. Trump isn't suicidal.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  9. Manning is NOT a whisteblower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Doesn't qualify at all.

    1. Re:Manning is NOT a whisteblower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that settles it then. Thanks for clearing that up.

    2. Re:Manning is NOT a whisteblower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

      He was angry that the military was throwing him out. That is all.

    3. Re:Manning is NOT a whisteblower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He sure doesn't. He's nothing but a standard run of the mill traitor. Needs the fucking gas chamber.

    4. Re:Manning is NOT a whisteblower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't waste the gas. Just give him a free vacation to Iran or maybe that region in Indonesia.

  10. remain an active duty? so this he she will get VA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    remain an active duty? so this he she will get VA! This trader should have life and be happy that they did not get death by firing squad!

  11. Yes, she would fall under the UCMJ, but... by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

    As long as she is on active duty, she falls under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). If the charge is violating military rules or regulations, she would be processed under the UCMJ. But, even for normal active duty personnel, many crimes or charges are handled by normal civilian courts if they do not involve other military personnel or occur on military property. The military has the option to process them under the UCMJ, but often just let civilian courts handle the charges.

    1. Re:Yes, she would fall under the UCMJ, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UCMJ has a charge called Conduct Unbecoming. This is a total catch all that is 100% subjective in its use.

    2. Re:Yes, she would fall under the UCMJ, but... by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Article 133 is conduct unbecoming an Officer. Manning is a private, so that does not apply.

  12. Just a pissed off employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just another pissed off government employee.

    Leaking documents showing illegal activities & war crimes--patriot.

    Leaking hundreds of thousands of other documents--criminal.

    1. Re:Just a pissed off employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes this ^.

  13. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Jzanu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Trump consistently acts incompetent, and needs a serious medical check-up to verify his cognitive capability to remain president or be removed for medical reasons (Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, or simply Dementia, etc.)

  14. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Opportunist · · Score: 0, Troll

    Maybe because he did it for the wrong reasons?

    Then again, it's nice to see a president I can relate to. A loudmouth, bigot, braggard... at first I thought he's just another rich, spoiled brat, but now I know, he's a rich, spoiled brat, all right, but still kinda one of us.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  15. Or by SlashDread · · Score: 4, Insightful

    7 years too late.

  16. Re: remain an active duty? so this he she will get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trader? You my non friend, are an absolute idiot. Feel free to remove yourself from the pool of humanity as quickly as possible.

  17. Why is this on Slashdot? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

    This is a topic that will keep the Beavis and Butthead crowd busy. Why would this concern anyone else?

    1. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be pretty happy with the topic: otherwise you wouldn't be posting, would you?

    2. Re: Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be pretty happy to troll, else you would post, would you?

    3. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I commented to another asshat that he and his friends should leave Slashdot and go find a Beavis and Butthead forum on Reddit. This topic doesn't help.

    4. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought this already was the Beavis and Butthead forum. Heh heh... Fire, Fire!

    5. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good lord, and you get paid for being miserable and hypocritical on Slashdot? I clearly need to learn your ways.

      You've clearly don't give a flying fuck about prison time, or having to deal with access to the firehose of war crimes and unethical behavior, you ignorant fat shit.

      It's people like you that are on the wrong side of history - saying things like "Who gives a shit? I've got mine, fuck all of you!", and you just don't give a flying fuck about anything. You can't really have kids, just extensions of your selfish will, and you won't fucking adopt because you wouldn't see them as being human.

      You don't understand what the cycle of poverty is, and you've certainly never had to deal with a financial crisis or drugs or physical abuse. You're everything wrong with white America - "much too young to focus, but too old to see".

      It's people like you that should travel, because your mind certainly doesn't. You don't give a shit about refugees, poor people, how education works, and won't bother to educate yourself with alternative viewpoints.

      And yes, I know "that you only post while you're waiting for a script to run while you work from home". Lucky you, using the benefits of your stay at home job to spread ignorance and misery wherever you may roam.

      Me? I just spent four hours yesterday posting about cryptocurrency mining tips so that people can have the financial opportunity to not have to work for ignorant shits like you. FFS - you have the skills to start your own Internet based services business, but you don't. And yet, you don't. How do I know? You say that you have the time to post on Slashdot as a secondary source of income - and you clearly wouldn't have time if you were a full time small business owner.

      There are better ways to respond to people, I understand that. However, you're miserable, confrontational and argumentative, so I've gotta stoop to your eye level, so to speak, so that somebody can challenge you on a level playing field.

      You're not anything. You're here on this fucking polluted piece of shit rock, and you've got your tiny strip of freedom and you think you know enough to prove everyone else wrong, but your posts have none of the greyness, admittance of ignorance and nuance that comes from experience with failure.

      I write this post out of a vain and self indulgent attempt to offer redemption in the way that I would've understood if somebody was writing to me in my moments of lashing out against an uncaring world. You ain't shit. You know that. It's about damn time that you found people worthy of your time, and worked to better yourself and others to make your existence a little less miserable.

      The things that work for me are Planet Money, 99% invisible, the Memory Palace, Invisibilia, Mythbusters, the White Rabbit Project, How It's Made, Modern Marvels, Battle 360, Future Weapons, anything by Neil Degrasse Tyson, Actuality, Freakonomics Radio, Radiolab, Car Talk and LinusTechTip's WAN Show, anytime that Luke and Linus host together.

    6. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      [...] never had to deal with a financial crisis or drugs or physical abuse.

      Great Recession, checked. Half of extended family are either drug smugglers or drug addicts, checked. Drunk mother throwing pots, pans and plates at my head, checked.

      It's people like you that should travel, because your mind certainly doesn't.

      I've traveled all the San Francisco Bay Area for church and work. Los Angeles twice, Boise twice and Las Vegas once.

      The things that work for me are Planet Money, 99% invisible, the Memory Palace, Invisibilia, Mythbusters, the White Rabbit Project, How It's Made, Modern Marvels, Battle 360, Future Weapons, anything by Neil Degrasse Tyson, Actuality, Freakonomics Radio, Radiolab, Car Talk and LinusTechTip's WAN Show, anytime that Luke and Linus host together.

      Other than the fact you haven't had your morning coffee (I'm drinking my skinny vanilla latte right now), do you have a point to make?

    7. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Fat-low Creamer telling someone they are not making a point. Up next:

      ==>see autism: APK telling someone they are offtopic

    8. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The Fat-low Creamer telling someone they are not making a point.

      I'm only willing to read so much verbal diarrhea. If I can't find the point, I'll point that out.

      APK telling someone they are offtopic

      I'm not APK.

    9. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's people like you that should travel, because your mind certainly doesn't.

      I've traveled all the San Francisco Bay Area for church and work. Los Angeles twice, Boise twice and Las Vegas once.

      LOL. I think Creimer has just topped the dumbest thing he has ever posted. "LA twice"
      I just thought of Blues Brothers "We play BOTH types of music, Country AND Western."

      lol

    10. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      "LA twice"

      Once to visit my brother's biological father and his family in 1985. Once for a church meeting at the LA Arena in 1995. Got no other reason to visit the South.

    11. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've traveled all the San Francisco Bay Area for church and work. Los Angeles twice, Boise twice and Las Vegas once.

      Of all the pathetic life details that you've felt the need to share, this one takes the cake. When modern people talk about travelling, they usually mean outside of their home country. Or at least farther than the immediately adjacent states. You're like a Silicon Valley version of Ignatius Reilly.

    12. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Or at least farther than the immediately adjacent states.

      For the record, Idaho is not adjacent to California. You have to drive through Nevada and Oregon to get to Boise, Idaho.

    13. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you've under sold the breadth of your globe trotting experience! What was it like to dine at McDonalds in Winnemucca? How did taking a piss break in McDermitt help you grow as a person?

    14. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      What was it like to dine at McDonalds in Winnemucca?

      Only stopped long enough to get gas.

      How did taking a piss break in McDermitt help you grow as a person?

      Never took a piss in McDermitt. Played the slot machines a few time at the motel.

    15. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Chelsea Manning's whistle-blower efforts contributed directly to the Arab Spring. At least five governments have been overthrown because of the corruption that she exposed. Whether her actions should be treated heroic or treacherous is one of the major political debates in the world today. The fact that these leaks were facilitated by internet media gives the story a technological aspect, specifically in the role of technology magnifying individual influence in media and politics.

      It should be easy to understand that updates on the progress of her legal case have a little bit more general interest than the inane details of your own pathetic life that you post every single day.

    16. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      [...] the inane details of your own pathetic life that you post every single day.

      For a moment I thought this was an intelligent post until I got to the Beavis and Butthead part.

    17. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its hard to ignore the contrast. You ignorantly dismiss why slashdot would be interested in a major international story. But you still feel compelled to overshare your own tragicomic life story on the very same forum. As if your trip to Boise is more interesting and worthy of discussion. Fucking Christ, get some perspective.

    18. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      As if your trip to Boise is more interesting and worthy of discussion.

      I'm just responding to comments. If you don't want me to respond, don't reply to my comments. The Beavis and Butthead crowd... just... can't... leave... it... alone.

    19. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      I'm not APK.

      How can we be so sure? I have never seen a creimer post inhabit the exact same post spot as an APK post... Coincidence? I think not.

    20. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      How can we be so sure? I have never seen a creimer post inhabit the exact same post spot as an APK post... Coincidence? I think not.

      APK and I had a pissing contest last December.

      https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=9952559&cid=53420987

    21. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Beavis, that's Vice President Biden to you, show some respect.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    22. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read about it on his blog, bro. He's not going to create content HERE, where he doesn't make fuck-you money for it!

    23. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      We all know APK is crazy... Talking to himself isn't that surprising.

    24. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      We all know APK is crazy... Talking to himself isn't that surprising.

      That's why I don't comment on his comments.

  18. Re: remain an active duty? so this he she will get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Additionally, feel free to read the whole article and pass judgement once you know all the details. Again, you have embarrassed not only yourself but the human race.

  19. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by CajunArson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So indiscriminantly dumping thousands of classified communications in an active warzone is "OK" because you hate Bush.

    But -- and this is assuming that the "narrative" is true -- Trump giving information to Russia pertaining to known terrorist plots to place explosives on civilian airliners that would result in the murder of innocent civilians is somehow "immoral" because wanting to protect civilians is evil now because Trump?

    --
    AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
  20. Re: remain an active duty? so this he she will get by Jzanu · · Score: 1

    Maybe they were using speech-to-text software? Even Dragon gets a lot wrong just reading text into speech, and software going the other way must also deal with background noise, etc.

  21. Re: remain an active duty? so this he she will get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lastly, she allowed the inappropriate actions taken by your country, if you are even from there and not just a useless piece of shit troll, to be revealed to the world.

    If anything, she should get an honour. More than you will ever receive from your armchair battle station. You flame the ones who allow you such freedoms.

    I salute the brave and scold the filth. I hope you feel scolded.

  22. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, he said he did it. Stop with the alleged. Snowden Manning are not heros by any stretch. Manning especially leaked so much, that it certainly put good people in danger, but also did expose lies our government was telling about specific events. Failed to filter.

  23. Re: remain an active duty? so this he she will ge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SCOLDED!!!!!!!! Yes, feel the burn.

  24. Common cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a British transgender woman whose healthcare has been blocked by the NHS for no reason other than administrative spite (which the NHS is well known for) I wish Chelsea well. I know what living within an invisible prison is and the distress instititional bullying causes. It's horrible but good friends and suppport can be a way through. Be well Chelsea and enjoy your new life.

    1. Re:Common cause by dskoll · · Score: 1

      I think we'd all be happier if you minded your own business and didn't discuss things of which you're ingnorant.

    2. Re:Common cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of the established science or law agrees with transphobic healthcare demiers at all but you are welcome to your opinion. I'm happy being me on my terms. There is a lot of grief between A to B mostly caused by medical bullies with a job title and attention seeking phobes milking the issue but otherwise life is good.

  25. Snowden vs Manning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Snowden - leaked sensitive information to demonstrate government abuse. He conducted the leaks in a way that limited damage and avoided the public release of information that could put agents in danger. Information was leaked with good intentions in order to benefit society, and as such Snowden should be hailed as a hero.

    Manning - leaked sensitive information because he wanted to take revenge on the army. He was pissed off about losing his day off per week because he was persistently late. He went nuts and smashed up the office and then leaked information. He leaked the information in the most damaging way possible with and did so purely out of malice. All actions were taken with the intention of doing as much harm as possible, and as such Manning should be in prison very a very long time.

    Incidentally, I use he because at the time of the events he was still a guy.

    1. Re:Snowden vs Manning by RevDisk · · Score: 1

      Yep. Putting Snowden and Manning in the same catagory is a bit of a disservice.

      Manning, regardless of one's opinions on the whole trans thing or whatnot, clearly had mental issues and should not have been given a clearance. When Private Manning leaked the material, it was out of anger at the military and the desire to cause it harm. Nothing showed clear cut criminal behavior of the US government, State Department or US military. Just lots of sensitive or embarrassing material.

      Snowden showed care in the release of the information. He was specifically disclosing illegal activity of the US government and had no other way of getting that information to the people who could stop it. You can only safely whistleblower lines in the intel and classified community is only for minor stuff. Entire programs being illegal? Yeah, you try to work within the system on that, at best your career is destroyed.

      Drill sergeants should unilaterally be able to cut anyone from military service for any reason whatsoever. Manning showed mental instability from day one.

    2. Re:Snowden vs Manning by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      The government elected not to try Snowden in absentia, so he hasn't been convicted of anything. No conviction -> no pardon.

      Also, if Obama said (and I'm not suggesting that he was inclined to do so) "we're not going to pursue charges against Snowden," someone else could still bring them later. The way out is for the government not to give a damn anymore, or for charges to at least be brought before a judge where they could be dismissed with prejudice - except, they wouldn't be, because, as the law is written now, there's a good case for them. I suppose, Congress could amend the law to include a Snowden exception, but I doubt that'll happen anytime soon.

    3. Re:Snowden vs Manning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Snowden was trans Obama would be all over a pardon for him, too. He's a white hetero male and is viewed as part of the problem.

      Winner, winner, chicken dinner.

      Yup. A real hero like Snowden is being punished while a nutcase who cut off his dick is a hero. Not feeling so patriotic today for some reason.

    4. Re: Snowden vs Manning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really?

      Typically, I see things written as "then-presidential-candidate Trump", that is, written with their concurrent title rather than their current one.

    5. Re:Snowden vs Manning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government elected not to try Snowden in absentia, so he hasn't been convicted of anything. No conviction -> no pardon.

      Not true at all. The President can issue a pardon without a prior conviction. The biggest example is Ford pardoning Nixon, but other examples exist.

    6. Re:Snowden vs Manning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government elected not to try Snowden in absentia, so he hasn't been convicted of anything. No conviction -> no pardon.

      Bullshit. Ford pardoned Nixon and there was no trial.

    7. Re:Snowden vs Manning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snowden disclosed to foreign nations the ongoing US intelligence operations against those nations.

      There was no 'whistleblowing' involved in that, even if you agree that disclosing info about programs that could be used against US citizens to be acceptable. Additionally, Snowden took millions of pages of intelligence data with him when he left; there is no way he could have 'carefully selected' any of that. He was no less a traitor than Manning, and he doesn't even have the excuse of having mental issues.

    8. Re: Snowden vs Manning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Incidentally, I use he because at the time of the events he was still a guy.

      Implying gender is a choice? He decided one day he was female?

      Suppose gender is something you are born with and he learned he was a female. Something to think about.

    9. Re:Snowden vs Manning by fox171171 · · Score: 1

      The government elected not to try Snowden in absentia, so he hasn't been convicted of anything. No conviction -> no pardon.

      This is simply not true.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pardon#United_States

      "A presidential pardon may be granted at any time, however, and as when Ford pardoned Nixon, the pardoned person need not yet have been convicted or even formally charged with a crime." - Duker, William F. (1976). "The President's Power to Pardon: A Constitutional History". Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 18: 501–502.

  26. Re:Freak show by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 5, Funny

    Have you seen his diet?

    --
    Eat the rich.
  27. Cisgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a cisgender hermaphrodite that was raised to be self-loathing by a physically and emotionally abusive alcoholic parents, I used modern medical science to get BOTH sexual organs - like a snail!

    And with my resulting narcissistic personality disorder, I plan on marrying a Kardashian or a Jenner and becoming President.

    Why accept oneself when there s surgery?

    1. Re:Cisgender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were a hermaphrodite at birth, you wouldn't have needed any help getting both organs. You have them already. Traditionally Din Doctor will take your Penis Stumpf out and say you're a girl to your obedient and God und Das Vaterland respecting parents.

  28. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...giving information to Russia pertaining to known terrorist plots to place explosives on civilian airliners that would result in the murder of innocent civilians is somehow "immoral" because wanting to protect civilians is evil now because Trump?

    No, not "because Trump." It's because he isn't Clinton. This would be exactly the same response if any other non-Clinton candidate had won and done the same thing. If a Clinton had won and done this, it would be the wisest act of diplomacy ever.

  29. Seth Rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yea, Seth Rich was just shot dead in DC for giving the DNC emails to WikiLeaks, and then the police were told not to investigate because they might find the truth and that Russia wasn't involved in the email leaks at all.

  30. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 0

    Most progressives that I know want to nail all of the above to the wall (with the exception of Lord Obama, of course). Dissent against The State is never something to be tolerated.

  31. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Info the Israelis gave to us in confidence, that we very well won't be getting any more of in the future, because Trump is an imbecile.

  32. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. No. There's a big difference between whistleblowing on illegal activities undertaken by our government and blabbing your mouth to impress some russian diplomats. If you can't see the difference, that's on you.

  33. Re: remain an active duty? so this he she will get by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Maybe they were using speech-to-text software? Even Dragon gets a lot wrong just reading text into speech, and software going the other way must also deal with background noise, etc.

    Then maybe they should try reading their fucking post first before pressing "Submit"?

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  34. Re:Freak show by Rei · · Score: 3, Funny

    He has the best diet.
    Nobody has a better diet than him.

    --
    FSB hits! FSB hits! Your democracy dies. Do you want your possessions identified?
  35. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A loudmouth, bigot, braggard..

    So someone you can pretty much read and understand them like an open book; unlike say Hillary *cough* secret email server *cough* Clinton.

  36. Re:Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Traitor, sexually confused, suicidal...

    Are we talking about Manning or Trump?

    I am just a Greek, but it was clear to me he was referring to Manning - now i am confused... because i can not understand why are you confused (since the story is about a sexually confused, suicidal, traitor *). What is so confusing that confuse you so much?

    * Since i am a Greek, i had to serve as a conscript in the Greek Armed Forces, so i know that, by military definitions, Manning is a traitor (plus, i consider trans people "sexually confused", and i know that Manning -i think partly because of his/her sexual confusion- was/is suicidal).

  37. BEWARE APACHES IN THE SKY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When they are O.R., which is not that often, so relax, take it easy.

  38. Re: remain an active duty? so this he she will ge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1

  39. Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We paid for it.

  40. Re:Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you seen his diet?

    Obama survived the Presidency despite his smoking habit...

  41. You Can't Handle the Truth! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    You Can't Handle the Truth!

    How long be for chelsea get's an code red?

  42. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by ganjadude · · Score: 1

    right? adults talking together like trump and russian diplomats is perfectly fine

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  43. Re: remain an active duty? so this he she will get by ganjadude · · Score: 2

    mbe u shood taake a chil pil

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  44. Chelsea Manning did no such thing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She is stealing the reputation of Bradley Manning (retired, unrelated).

    The only reason Chelsea got out of prison is likey for exploiting a corrupt prison administration! She sucks dick better than Bradley, whom has been lockup ever since stealing sensitive Assgasistan warlord intelligence to Wikileaks.

  45. Re:Freak show by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

    All the best people say so. Very good people, highly professional, top-level people.

    --
    Eat the rich.
  46. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by AlanObject · · Score: 1, Troll

    Obama: Working with the security community to develop a mid-east strategy.

    Snowden: Whistleblower exposing highly illegal activities of secret government agencies at great cost to himself. Very methodical in his process of leaking to minimize any collateral damage.

    Manning: Whistleblower exposing highly activities of military and other government agencies at great cost to herself. Can be criticized for the indiscriminate nature of the leaks but had much different conditions than Snowden.

    Trump: Just bragging to stoke his own ego. Endangers allied intelligence source for absolutely no other benefit unless he is actually in collusion of a rival power (which I personally doubt). Total disregard for his duties of office or of any responsibilities of those reporting to him.

    I really wonder what kind of mentality someone has to have in order to not to be able to see the difference.

  47. Manning's real motives by mi · · Score: 0

    There's a big difference between whistleblowing on illegal activities

    Manning did it to impress his boyfriend:

    To parse Private Bradley Manning’s motivation for sharing classified documents with WikiLeaks, the New York Times talks to Manning’s circle of friends, including a group of “politically motivated computer hackers” that he met through his boyfriend, a drag queen. Those friends suspect that Manning was compelled by “desperation for acceptance — or delusions of grandeur.”

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  48. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    More to the point, you don't have to think for a long time about the fact that Israel had critical information about Daesh to realize that there's some extremely sensitive information gathering source that they don't want getting out, and quite possibly one that could get people killed in a brutal manner if exposed.

    It was information given to the US that wasn't even allowed to be shared with US allies because of the sensitivity of its source.

  49. Re:Stop calling him she. It's a man wearing a wig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pop quiz: how do your cells know what sex they are?

  50. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by bobbied · · Score: 1

    LOL.. You do realize they said the same thing about Reagan right?

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  51. Re: Transgender IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you just did it to get the job right? gender equality employment quotas?

  52. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Info the Israelis gave to us in confidence, that we very well won't be getting any more of in the future, because Trump is an imbecile.

    And how do we know that?

    The media that's SOOOOO CONCERNED about Trump spilling secrets turns around and SPILLS MORE SECRETS???

    B-b-b-b-b-but TRUMP!!!!!.

    Grow the fuck up.

    Jesus H. Fucking Christ you progtards are like a broken pull-string toy that can only spout crap like "Rethuglican!" "Booooosh is EVUL!" (now Trump), and of course, "That's RAAAACIST!!!

    All the while you cover for Democrat failures such as Hillary! when the 1%er billionaire Democrat banksters and money launderers force her down your throat. Sometimes I really think inner city black schools are deliberately set to fail by the Democrats that run them just to keep blacks on the Democrat voting plantation with "moah free stuffs!"

    You're utterly fucking predictable and about as deep as a July parking lot puddle by a pawn shop in a dilapidated Florida strip mall.

  53. Re:Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope; BeauHD

  54. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    He sure was the lesser evil. I don't doubt that.

    Unfortunately the election process does not allow for "neither, reroll!"

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  55. Re:Freak show by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    He only has to last 4 more years. If only to avoid Pence as prez.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  56. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Info the Israelis gave to us in confidence, that we very well won't be getting any more of in the future, because Trump is an imbecile.

    The only people saying the intel was from Israel are the media and an anonymous source in the government. Yet we were told by the media only a day earlier that the Russians could reverse engineer the intelligence provided by the POTUS despite him never mentioning the source. In fact, according to the National Security Advisor the President was not told of the origin. Strange how the media can reveal the presumed source (nation state) of the intelligence but mere false rumours about the President telling the Russian Ambassador and Foreign Minister about the threat not the origin of the information is enough to get the media into a genital licking orgy.

  57. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    It's hard to claim lesser-evil when one is incompetent and the other is a retard, and yet both have managed to con their way into shitloads of money.

  58. Re:Enlistment is not forever by svendsen · · Score: 1

    Actually there are a lot of legal ways the military can hold an enlisted soldier past their ETS. One example being stop loss. Another is oh we forgot to do your paperwork in time so you have to stay in until we process you.

    I am in the military, and I know multiple people 1 -3 years past their ETS and are still in because of various reasons not of their choosing.

  59. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, and your point is?

  60. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good for you middle school is almost out for the summer. You'll have even more time to post well thought-out commentary on Slashdot and the Alex Jones forums.

  61. Re:Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Literally, according to her trial, Manning was not a traitor. Found innocent of giving aid to the enemy (which gets the death penalty). In the US (I don't know about Greece) the charge of treason has a very specific definition in the constitution.

  62. Re:Freak show by arth1 · · Score: 1

    Obama survived the Presidency despite his smoking habit...

    He was also 48, 180 lbs and a runner, not 70 years old, 235 lbs, and on statins for high cholesterol.

    I would not bet a lot of money on Trump being alive 8 years from now, for health reasons alone.

  63. Re:Freak show by PoopJuggler · · Score: 2

    At least Pence isn't incompetent. Trump has no fucking idea what he's doing. It's like putting a chimp behind the wheel of a jumbo jet.

  64. Mental issue by p51d007 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Thinking getting a chop-a-dic-off-of-me, or an add-a-dic-to-me can change your gender is about as smart as thinking you can change lead into gold. It's a MENTAL disorder. Unless you figure a way to change your DNA from XX=female, to XY=Male just because you may or may not have a penis doesn't mean you can change it to the other. The rare case of XXY would be about the only exception. Until the late 70's, the DSM book considered gender disorder as such, a psychological disorder. But, with the age of political correctness, whatever these snowflakes want, they get.

    1. Re:Mental issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree 100% with your post. But you may wan to get a SJW-be-gone after what you said because I'm sure you'll be flamed out by SJW's constantly.

      Political correctness will be our undoing (as a society!) When you deny scientific facts to avoid upsetting people then we've lost. We might as well make decisions by slaughtering chickens and studying the entrails. People rapidly forget it was scientific and logical thought that built our civilization.

    2. Re:Mental issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't care what you call it. There's no cure for it, so why not let him live a happier life as a female? How does it affect you?

      Oh, that's right - it doesn't, so quit acting like a crybaby about it.

      Don't worry - nobody said you have to like it. (That's the best part)

    3. Re:Mental issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is truly unfortunate that you've skipped the last 20 years of biology and neuroscience. Basically everything you've said has been scientifically disproven. Sex is not gender, gender dysphoria is a "mental disorder" the same way ADHD is, only with an actual treatment that is effective. Become scientifically literate, and you won't embarrass yourself with your ignorance anymore :)

    4. Re:Mental issue by Megol · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Strangely science doesn't agree with you. Human sexuality isn't just about external sexual attributes (and it have been know not to be for a long time) nor just driven by hormonal cycles. We know scent affects people according to their perceived gender and/or sexual orientation and we know that brain structures of transsexuals are generally matching the ones of the perceived gender.

      But you focus on external attributes only. Too bad we can't add-a-broin-to-u...

    5. Re: Mental issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the establishment PC mongers *did* say we have to like it. At the point of a gun. That's why people are so upset. No one gives a flying fuck who you wanna shag, so long as you keep it to yourself.

    6. Re: Mental issue by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Most trans assault victims who are transvestites, not transsexuals, are assaulted by people they deceive into thinking they were the opposite sex.

      Same with the "trans day of remembrance." Most trans murder victims are transvestites. The murder rate for white female transsexuals is lower than the general population.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    7. Re:Mental issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plenty of things are mental disorders. In fact, I'd bet that most people suffer from one or another at least at some point in their lives. Some seek help, others cope, some make their way through it and come out stronger on the other side, and no matter what or why someone is mentally ill, they deserve the sympathy of others even if they can't understand why the other person feels the way they do or where they're coming from.

      I, for one, don't think transgender people should be forced into any kind of mental facility or be treated any differently than any other person who has an illness. If they wish to seek help, they should be able to do so, not lied to by the media into thinking that everyone else is a problem and they are the special snowflake. And that being said, I agree that you can't "change" your gender. There are thousands of parts in your body and many, if not all, of them can develop differently based on your gender.

      A car analogy might seem crude or cliche at this point, but the situation is strikingly similar. Cars also have thousands of parts, all designed together to make up a certain model. Think about the kids who buy a US domestic Honda Civic and bolt a bunch of Japanese Integra parts to them and slap Type-R badges all over them. I have no problem with those kids or their cars, none whatsoever, but they know as well as I do that they're driving a US Honda Civic, not a Japanese Honda Integra Type-R.

      You can even make a US Honda Civic look convincingly like an Integra Type-R with enough work. However, for example, if you were trying to sell it to someone else as anything other than a Honda Civic, you'd be engaged in fraud. Again, if you want your Honda Civic to look like something else, this is a free country and as someone who believes in personal freedoms, I fully believe you should be able to do so. And I won't for one second ridicule you for doing something that makes you happy.

      But don't sit here and tell me that you can turn that car into anything other than a Honda Civic, or that I should be forced by law to acknowledge that your Civic is now some other make and model of vehicle. And you're also playing with fire unless you really know what you're doing. You might now have a mutiliated Honda Civic, that isn't any good as a Honda Civic OR anything else, or you might later regret destroying what was once a perfectly good Honda Civic by trying so hard to force it into being something that it just isn't. But, I guess you might also end up with a very beautiful Honda Civic that runs, looks and drives better than any Integra Type-R ever manufactured. But at the end of the day you still have a Honda Civic, and you can't force me or browbeat me into saying you don't.

      Also, the media doesn't tell me that I'm literally the KKK if don't acknowledge your Civic as an Integra, or that I should be locked up as a fascist Nazi for telling you the truth. I won't go out of my way to avoid hurting your feelings just because YOU'VE convinced yourself something that isn't true actually is. It's a fact that you have a Honda Civic, no matter how badly you want it to be something else. And facts are facts, period. The same goes for this other argument, I will not call a she a he or vice-versa just because they want me to. I won't ridicule you, and I won't pass judgement if you are a he who wants to look like a she or a she who feels like a he and wants to express those feelings, but science is science, and facts are facts, and I refuse to participate in the mass mental illness that is modern political correct progressivism.

    8. Re:Mental issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XXY is not an exception. They're still male (but usually infertile).

    9. Re: Mental issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean 'the last twenty years of pharmacology and drug company profits.'

      Mechanistic approaches have been fruitful, to be certain. And a reductive approach that treats humans like manipulable chemical machines is easier than accepting uncertainty and embracing wholeness.

      You don't get fucking tenure by understanding how complex things are. You get it by carving a little hole to reside in.

    10. Re: Mental issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the establishment PC mongers *did* say we have to like it. At the point of a gun. That's why people are so upset

      No idea who the fuck you're talking about. Who'd you hear that from, Trump?

      No one gives a flying fuck who you wanna shag, so long as you keep it to yourself.

      No need to keep it to themselves, especially since IT DOESN"T EVEN FUCKING AFFECT YOU.

      NOBODY said you have to like it.

    11. Re:Mental issue by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Thinking getting a chop-a-dic-off-of-me, or an add-a-dic-to-me can change your gender is about as smart as thinking you can change lead into gold.

      So, what you are saying is that if you're smart and understand modern science then you'll know it is in fact possible, if rather hard.

      Then again your knowledge of biology is outdated and you seem terribly upset that the DSM isn't stuck in the 1970s, so I guess it isn't much surprise that you missed that whole discovery of subatomic particles, particle accelerators, nuclear reactors and whatnot.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    12. Re: Mental issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh except for the people who have been fined, arrested, lost their job, and received death threats for the crime of thinking there are two genders.. But besides them, you mean.

    13. Re: Mental issue by Jesus+H+Rolle · · Score: 1

      The murder rate for white female transsexuals is lower than the general population.

      The murder rate for whites is lower than the general population. How about black female transsexuals?

    14. Re: Mental issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're getting downbloated because a very specific type of person doesn't care about truth and science, they will share someone else's delusions if it spares their feelings. Cowards.

    15. Re: Mental issue by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Gotcha! The murder rate for white female transsexuals is lower than female non-transsexuals. Explain away that.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    16. Re: Mental issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, because queer bashing never happens...

      Hey, if you don't want to be treated like shit, then don't treat other people like shit.

    17. Re: Mental issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most American blacks who are murdered are murdered by other American blacks. Take up your issue with them.

    18. Re: Mental issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that people that act out violently against those in the LBGTQ community shouldn't suffer those punishments?

      Surely they're not being punished for thinking there are only two genders.

      And, by the way, there are only two genders. Unfortunately, some people are born under the wrong one. But there are a whole host of other birth defects, too. So I hope you have enough hate to go around, because you're not going to get any help from me.

      In the end it doesn't matter anyway, because NOBODY SAID YOU HAVE TO LIKE IT. :)

      P.S. - That's a real smile I have on my face, when I type that. (And a real fucking big one, too).

    19. Re:Mental issue by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      It's far easier to turn gold into lead, which oddly enough, circles back to the original topic of transgender, since such sexually confused people who believe that gender is only mental, are worth about as much as lead in comparison to gold when it comes to the propagation of a heteronormative species.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    20. Re:Mental issue by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Gender is about how we act and how we want to present ourselves, which are basically mental.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    21. Re:Mental issue by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      So what? Just because it's easier doesn't mean the reverse isn't possible. The OP claim something factually incorrect to support his point. Fortunately for people, only the deeply foolish judge their worth on their ability or willingness to have children. By your system of worth, Donald Trump is worth vastly more than George Washington and the Wright brothers, but I guess that figures...

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    22. Re:Mental issue by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Only insane people disconnected from reality think so. Which basically describes all of western civilization at this point.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    23. Re:Mental issue by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I was agreeing with the original post- it is possible to turn lead into gold- but adding the commentary that transgender people take the gold they were given in their natural gender, and on purpose turn it into lead- and badly disguised lead at that.

      And yes- in the long run, your worth is based on what your grandchildren do, not what you do.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    24. Re:Mental issue by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      In other words you're stretching the analogy past breaking point. The gender you are given is not gold, it just is whatever it is. It's neutral.

      And yes- in the long run, your worth is based on what your grandchildren do, not what you do.

      You've softened it slightly, but it seems like you are saying the Trump is of more worth than George Washington `because me managed to impregnate some people.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    25. Re:Mental issue by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      To a homonormative species, sexuality is the gift that brings forth children. Is that not more precious than Gold?

      I'd say you have a rather short term point of view.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  65. Re:Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have not followed the trail, and i don't know the USA laws, but in Greece a traitor is a traitor - a traitor may be a traitor that either "gave aid to the enemy" (worst case - death penalty in war time, life sentence -25 years actually, if a civilian- in peace time) or not (still a traitor - death penalty in war time, maximum 25 years sentence in peace time). Note: we don't have a death penalty in peace time, plus a "life sentence" for civilians is 25 years maximum (even less in some cases).

  66. Re:Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Traitor, sexually confused, suicidal...

    Are we talking about Manning or Trump?

    I am just a Greek, but it was clear to me he was referring to Manning - now i am confused... because i can not understand why are you confused (since the story is about a sexually confused, suicidal, traitor *). What is so confusing that confuse you so much?

    * Since i am a Greek, i had to serve as a conscript in the Greek Armed Forces, so i know that, by military definitions, Manning is a traitor (plus, i consider trans people "sexually confused", and i know that Manning -i think partly because of his/her sexual confusion- was/is suicidal).

    Since you are Greek, I'll forgive your confusion. Bashing US President Trump has become very popular; the post you answered was meant as a joke, with the follow-up that Trump isn't suicidal implies that Trump is a traitor and sexually confused.

  67. He is a he. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lopping off your tallywacker, inserting a fake vagina, getting breast implants, "self identifying as a woman, and/or taking hormone shots does not make you a woman. Unless you believe silk can be made from a sow's ear, so for you gullible idiots with weak minds that do so, boy do I have some bargains for you.

    1. Re:He is a he. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. The world has moved on. I have faith that one day transphobes will be viewed in the same way as flat earthers.

    2. Re:He is a he. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, those idiots with intangible beliefs and nothing scientific to back up their...oh wait.

  68. How about some humanity? sorry wrong country. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    How fucking typical American the evil shit your country does to whistle blowers and you people delight in the torture they receive. This is one of many reasons why the civilized world views America as uncivilized.
      You people do not even know your military and government are your enemy.
      Obama has been the worst president on record on the treatment of whistle blowers and you people love it.
      Any punishment for the fucking crime of having a conscience is fair game?
    There has been other whistler blowers that were not treated as bad but still are never allowed to work again except at fast food places same for their spouses who were not involved because that justice only in America where there are now laws if you are in power or very wealthy.

    1. Re: How about some humanity? sorry wrong country. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How fucking typical non-American to think that your own shit don't stink.

  69. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

    If a Clinton had won and done this, it would be the wisest act of diplomacy ever.

    Clinton wouldn't have done it. That's the point. Fuck it, Bush Jr wouldn't have done it. Can you see any President in living memory, except maybe Reagan (who had an excuse) doing this? I can't.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  70. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they were right about him - he was actually showing signs of Alzheimer's while still in office.

  71. Re:Freak show by olsmeister · · Score: 2

    Excercise? Who needs it.

  72. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their hypocrisy bone has flared up. I hear tell laudanum is good for such ailments.

  73. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by mi · · Score: 1

    Manning: Whistleblower exposing highly activities [...]

    False. Manning's motivation was not political — as already cited above, he was trying to impress his gay friend(s).

    Trump: Just bragging to stoke his own ego.

    You are welcome to question Trump's judgment, but his actions are completely legal — what to communicate to other nations is entirely in the President's discretion. Manning and Snowden broke national laws — just laws, I might add, whose validity no one is questioning.

    I really wonder what kind of mentality someone has to have in order to not to be able to see the difference.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  74. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Perhaps trusting Wikileaks wasn't the best move, but she did expose some serious corruption and of course war crimes like the "collateral murder" in Iraq.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  75. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please stop lying. Nothing you said is true.

  76. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How many countries could fit into this description given by White House officials:

    " The officials declined to identify the ally but said it has previously voiced frustration with Washington’s inability to safeguard sensitive information related to Iraq and Syria."

    from
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-revealed-highly-classified-information-to-russian-foreign-minister-and-ambassador/2017/05/15/530c172a-3960-11e7-9e48-c4f199710b69_story.html?utm_term=.3a325f84481a

    just the first link I came across can not spend too much time now at work on this though I do recall reading other places where officials gave very narrow hints without saying names. But does it really matter in the long run president giving away intel to outsiders before allies in any case is going to slowdown how much other countries will be willing to share in fear for their agencies being hurt.

    lol captcha syringe

  77. Re:Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be ridiculous. Trump isn't suicidal.

    Thanks. You just ruined my day.

  78. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you think every person on the planet is a US citizen now?

  79. Thanks, Obama! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There. I said it.

  80. Re: Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a laugh! keep telling yourself that.

  81. Someone will shoot this traitor/bastard eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the world will be a better place.

  82. Bradley Manning is a BALDING FAGGOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just a deranged shitfucking faggot

  83. Re:Prisons are dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure the comment was asking how the hell are people in prison getting a sex change?

  84. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honey we're having a hard time understanding your mentality. Are you on your period, or just in a standard woman's bitch phase? Quit being overemotional. We know you're a woman; you've made it quite obvious. Just relax and turn off your TV.

  85. Re:Freak show by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

    He has the best diet.

    He looks like he's one KFC Gravy Bowl away from a grabber.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  86. actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not 28 years early, but 7 years too late.

    The Obama administration was wreckless and irresponsible for pursing this in the first place

  87. Re: Freak show by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1, Informative

    No.

    United States Senator
    from Illinois
    In office
    January 3, 2005 – November 16, 2008

    Member of the Illinois Senate
    from the 13th district
    In office
    January 8, 1997 – November 4, 2004

    --
    Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  88. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by mi · · Score: 1

    Clinton wouldn't have done it.

    Though no one can say for certain, it is very likely, she would've either done it deliberately (for the same perfectly sane reasons Trump did), or left the information (and lots more of it) available for the Russians to avail themselves of on her outside server(s). Which she would have kept using "for yoga schedules" to avoid various things from becoming subject to Open Record laws...

    Only you would've defended her tooth and nail, while dismissing all dissenters as sexist.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  89. Re: Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's racist!

  90. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you think not?
    Do you remember when Obama ordered that the US Intelligence Community begin sharing classified information with Cuba? Cuba, longtime ally of US enemies Iran, Venezuela, and Russia?

    Remember when Obama revealed the name of the CIA Chief of Station in Afghanistan? An act that put the man's life in immediate, and long term, danger?

    Or when Obama's White House 'accidentally' leaked Stuxnet during the 2012 election campaign, allowing Obama to pretend to be tough on Iran?

    If Obama did it, why do you think Clinton wouldn't? Her vast experience at handling secure emails?

  91. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So indiscriminantly dumping thousands of classified communications in an active warzone is "OK" because you hate Bush.

    The interesting thing about the law is that intent matters. If I run someone over with my car, there's a big difference between whether it was an accident or something I planned out carefully for months in advance. If Manning had sold the information to Al Qaeda for profit that would indeed be bad.

    But what does it mean to be American? Fundamentally, being American is about believing in freedom and democracy - and, particularly, freedom that facilitates democracy - specifically, the importance of being sufficiently informed about what the government is doing (both good and bad) to have an effective "government of, by, and for the [ordinary] people". There are a lot of countries around the world (Singapore, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, etc.) where people are not allowed to freely discuss the things their government is doing wrong. I imagine that some people like it that way. But Americans are supposed to believe in freedom of speech. It's even right there in the first amendment of the Bill of Rights in the US constitution.

    So what about the things the US government was doing in the era of Manning's leaks? Well, we now know that the US military tortured a number of innocent people to death (Dilawar and some others at Bagram and then the whole Abu Ghraib thing a bit later - under the same commander, incidentally). Plus, there's wars and then there's wars. In some cases, a country just minding its own business and then some other country comes along and tries to invade and occupy it - and fighting back is clearly a matter of self defense. But the mess in Iraq was a bizarre little banana republic war where some rich and powerful people (e.g. Bush, Cheney, and the Saudi dictators) were waging a war to compete for access to the region's oil.

    There were lots of questions about what the USA was doing in that era. In particular, there was a crucial need for the American public to be informed about the full truth of a all the bad things the US government was doing. So, to the extent that Manning was intending to promote informed democracy, that's about as noble a goal as any true American can have.

    ...Trump giving information to Russia...

    In general, I'm not all that concerned about Trump, or anyone else, leaking "classified" information. The vast majority of classified information is only classified to prevent embarrassment of corrupt and incompetent government officials.

    However, with regard to the mess in Syria, Putin is solidly on Assad's side and would undoubtedly pass on any information obtained from the USA to Assad if he thought it would help Assad stay in power. And Assad is a pretty bad dude so, all else being equal, it wouldn't be ideal for the USA to be helping Russia keep Assad in power.

  92. It was a guy who leaked the stuff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the traitor decided that he is not a guy any more and everyone started talking about him as "she"?
    That is insane. Releasing traitors is evil. Traitors should be shot. Even if they think they are women.

  93. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by letthelightin · · Score: 1

    There's no active war zone the government is a part of.

    The United States government hasn't declared war since WWII.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Or is modern government entirely illegitimate not following it's own constitution? Is the modern government entirely illegitimate, working not on behalf of the People, but on behalf of corporations? Should the People form a new government, to replace the old false one?

  94. He is not a wisleblower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is a traitor.

  95. Re:Freak show by demonlapin · · Score: 2

    Treason is the only crime whose definition is part of the US Constitution. There are a horde of lesser offenses under which someone who has committed treasonous acts might be convicted, but a conviction for treason itself requires either a confession in open court, or two eyewitnesses to the same overt act of treason. Stands to reason that a bunch of people who had recently rebelled against the authority of King and Parliament would be a bit touchy about the definition of "treason".

  96. Why is some body integrity identity disorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is rightly ignored? If someone says "Doc, this arm is really bothering me, mentally speaking, and identify as a one-armed person. I need you to lop it off." Doc says "Umm...no, we're not going to do that."

    But say ""Doc, this penis is really bothering me, mentally speaking, and identify as a female person. I need you to lop it off."

    Doc says "Step right this way, we'll get started on that."

    In Manning's case, taxpayers funded it.

  97. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by butzwonker · · Score: 1

    You are welcome to question Trump's judgment, but his actions are completely legal

    That's fairly irrelevant. As a president, Trump could literally commit a crime and pardon himself for it. He could even pardon himself for future crimes. Both would lead to impeachment, but he could do it.

    I think what people don't like about this little incident is the fact that there was no reason for it and that intelligence agencies are seriously worried about him, because he's arguably the most retarded US president ever and has (at least officially) full and unrestricted access to every state secret. However, there is probably no real danger, because it's quite likely that they don't give him access to any valuable secrets in practice.

  98. Mmmmm...Ganymede by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Getting aroused already.

    1. Re:Mmmmm...Ganymede by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anagram of "De gay men"

  99. Re:Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is not being ridiculous, he is just over optimistic.

  100. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by mi · · Score: 1

    As a president, Trump could literally commit a crime [...]

    Wrong. An actual crime is subject to impeachment. Point was, intelligence-sharing is up to the President in the first place.

    I think what people don't like about this little incident

    The "people" you are talking about simply hate Trump. Period. The article about Obama sharing intelligence with Putin in 2016, which I linked to earlier, was written by the same Karen de Young, who is now mocking and denouncing Trump for similar cooperation.

    and that intelligence agencies are seriously worried about him

    Which intelligence agencies are you talking about with such grave respect? The same ones betrayed by your heroes Snowden and Manning — who, according to you and yours, deserve a medal for their betrayals — or some other, noble and glorious ones?

    they don't give him access to any valuable secrets in practice.

    That would've been dereliction of duty at least and possibly treason as well. Trump was duly elected as President — intelligence agencies ought to work for him, not sabotage him.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  101. Re:Freak show by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

    Sexually confused, maybe.

    Personally I suspect someone is playing games and dropped some hints that being a tranny would help his chance of parole.

  102. Re:Freak show by lgw · · Score: 1

    He has the best diet.
    Nobody has a better diet than him.

    He gets two scoops of ice cream - everyone else only gets one! (Yes, CNN actually ran this story - hard hitting investigative reporting.)

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  103. Re:Freak show by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

    It's a HUGE diet. A BIG BEAUTIFUL diet. A GREAT AMERICAN diet. And Mexico is going to pay for it.

    Of course, the truth is that he's not getting any from his wife any more, so he's compensating with food.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  104. False Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Join the military, see some stuff that is corrupt, mention it, then spend the rest of your life in the military prison.

    They just don't show that bit when they advertise for recruits, the real military experience should be portrayed.

    And isn't it the case that the allied troops raped hundreds of thousands of German women post WWII?

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/11455664/Allied-soldiers-raped-hundreds-of-thousands-of-German-women-after-WW2.html

    Probably deserves a mention in each of their Ads.nice to know what the heritage of the organisation is before joining.

  105. Re:Freak show by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Why do you consider transsexuals to be "sexually confused?" Don't you know half are straight? Seems to me you're the one who is confused about how it works. The sex act has nothing to do with being transsexual. It's the sex you identify with, not the sex you want to screw.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  106. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, every half-decent president would share intel. If we listened to Russian intelligence they freely gave us, the Boston Marathon bombing would not have happened. Innocent people died because of a lack of collaboration. Now we are collaborating to save innocent civilian lives and catch terrorists.

    Somehow preventing terrorism is being spun as a bad thing.

  107. What about Bradley Manning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will he be released?

  108. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... because you hate Bush.

    ... because Trump

    Believe it or not, some of us don't treat politics and law as spectator sports or celebrity popularity contests. Actions can be right or wrong regardless of who does them. I know, I know, it's a tough concept for a modern Republican to understand.

  109. moar! by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 1

    Go feminism!

    I'm disappointed, grrls! You can do better than this! I count only 7 mentions of "Bradley" in the comments and 21 mentions of "confuse" in 302 comments.

    Show those misogynerds that Bradley is a man with a mental illness no matter how confused he is. He needs psychiatric treatment, not to have his body butchered in an attempt to rape the female form. Drive it home to this rapist that he's an incomplete being and never will be a womyn-born-womyn no matter how delusional he expects the rest of us to be.

    1. Re:moar! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      u wot m8?

      Seriously, I can't tell which bits you are being serious about, which bits you are being sarcastic about and what on earth point you're trying to make.

      On an unrelated note, do you have an extensive hosts file?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  110. Re:Freak show by budgenator · · Score: 1

    He has the best diet.

    He looks like he's one KFC Gravy Bowl away from a grabber.

    Damn you, I almost lost my lunch, KFC Gravy is the second most disgusting food known to man, KFC mashed potatoes being the first.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  111. Oblig. Married With Children by OutOnARock · · Score: 1

    Marcy, to Steve, after making a loan to Al:

    If you give a gun to a chimp, and the chimp shoots someone, you don't blame the chimp...

  112. Huh. No wonder he's a such a girly homosexual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at that dwarf ginger manlet. What is he, 4ft tall? built like 12 year-old child

    what a tiney faggot

  113. Re:Freak show by budgenator · · Score: 1

    At least Pence isn't incompetent. Trump has no fucking idea what he's doing. It's like putting a chimp behind the wheel of a jumbo jet.

    Pence Knows how to fly the Jumbo Jet, but you wouldn't like where he flies it.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  114. Re:Freak show by pellik · · Score: 1

    Just keep staring in awe as trump makes a mess of everything. Pay no mind to what Paul Ryan is doing.

  115. Thank Shrillary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Shrillary never served a day, then seven years is way too long for Manning. 10th Amendment issue waiting to boil over.

  116. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    Trump consistently acts incompetent, and needs a serious medical check-up to verify his cognitive capability to remain president or be removed for medical reasons (Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, or simply Dementia, etc.)

    Trouble is that people very familiar with him, including the guy that helped work on The Art of the Deal book who wrote an article today, have been saying since he started running for office, that he has always been like this and the way he is acting is no surprise and even predicted.

  117. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you were looking for James Bond, consider which bit of intel would be more useful:

    A)The country Bond works for
    B)The city Bond is operating in

    A remains a consistent answer throughout the series: Great Britain. B varies with the story, and indeed typically changes during the story. Trump telling the Russians where the intel came from compromised the agent of our ally (Israel or whoever), against their specific request and to the detriment of their intelligence network if Russia were to spread the information to it's allies which might be hostile to said network. We of the peanut gallery only learned that the stupid laptop ban had an actual threat behind it, and (maybe) that Mossad uncovered it.

  118. Re: Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol.

    Freak show is right. You explaining it just further concretes the idea these granny's are freaks with a load of other problems.

    Maybe they should be worked by instead of playing dress up and going drugs.

    And manning. We know he did it in order to get out of prison.

  119. Re: Freak show by bestweasel · · Score: 1

    White House: "Comey was not fired because of the Russia investigation. "
    Trump: "I fired Comey because of the Russia investigation."

    White House: "The President did not divulge secrets to the Russians."
    Trump: "Yes I did."

  120. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Most progressives that I know want to nail all of the above to the wall (with the exception of Lord Obama, of course). Dissent against The State is never something to be tolerated.

    Right so if you come on slashdot then ignore all of the progressives who in fact do not fit your strange fantasies, then you can indeed lump all the progressives you "know" into some arbitrary bucket.

    So, sure you can, but what's the point? Unless you happen to have a thing for circular definitions and get off on it. Takes all sorts, and I won't judge, but could you post AC so I don't have to see it?

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  121. Re: When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump didn't do it because he weighed up all the pros and cons, he just blurted it out because, well who knows?

    This'll show the Russians how smart we are.
    I know a really big secret and I want to tell someone.
    Wait, was that one of the things I wasn't supposed to tell?

  122. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    False. Manning's motivation was not political â" as already cited above, he was trying to impress his gay friend(s).

    Now that's very interesting. Why is it relevant that Manning's "friend(s)" were gay? To me that seems utterly irrelevant, but for some reason you seem to feel compelled to bring it up. There are some very revealing parallels to your signature.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  123. Weird place, Slashdot by bestweasel · · Score: 2

    There are many more comments about Manning's genitalia than about his/her actions. What is it with you people?

    S/he did more than anyone else to disclose the obscene careless violence used by the US military in Iraq. As in the 1st Gulf War, the western media were largely controlled by the military, keeping them away from anything they shouldn't see. Manning almost single-handedly lifted that curtain and should be lauded for doing so.

    Those of you harking back to the days when the US could bomb anyone with impunity would do well to consider - even if you discount the immorality - the long term harm to US interests caused by such actions.

    Obama (who like every US President has been responsible for lots of deaths) clearly recognized the importance of Manning's actions in deciding to release her.

    1. Re:Weird place, Slashdot by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

      Don't be so hard on the slashdotters for being Freudian. They can't help it.

      --
      Chewbacon
      The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
  124. Re:Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not his diet, have you seen his obnoxious attitude? Sooner or later he's going to piss off the wrong person and they're going to put him down.

    Acting like that is a sign of a death wish if I ever saw one.

  125. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong. An actual crime is subject to impeachment

    That's literally what I stated in the following sentence.

    The "people" you are talking about simply hate Trump. Period.

    That's absolutely right, and the have many excellent reasons for hating him. He's an idiot and embarrassment to your nation like no US president was before. He's embarrassing, that's the problem.

    Which intelligence agencies are you talking about with such grave respect?

    No grave respect. I was stating a fact. Whether you should have respect for those agencies or not is irrelevant to the question at hand. They are rightly worried about Trump.

    That would've been dereliction of duty at least and possibly treason as well.

    That would be the reasonable thing to do, and more or less the opposite of treason.

    Trump was duly elected as President — intelligence agencies ought to work for him, not sabotage him.

    Only insofar as he does not pose an immediate and real security risk.

  126. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

    could you post AC so I don't have to see it?

    Big surprise -- another liberal who can't handle hearing viewpoints different than their own.

  127. Re: Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They forgot the photos of Obama/Biden with 2 cones each...

  128. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Big surprise -- another liberal who can't handle hearing viewpoints different than their own.

    When did simply making shit up become a "viewpoint"?

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  129. No, you fat faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is nobody wants to hear about your tubby gaylife. Youre a fat weirdo - thats fine. Keep your fat weirdo faggtshit to yourself.

    1. Re:No, you fat faggot by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Nope, neither obese nor gay. I've never even been to a Pride parade, or the gay village, for that matter. I leave that to the LGB, as is their right, same as they have the right to marry, adopt, kiss in public, same as other couples. That must really piss you off, that you can't evolve enough to lose the "ick factor," and you know this makes you inferior.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:No, you fat faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong everywhere. The objection is to faggots trying to criminalise speech and modify everyone's behaviour.

      Pissed off? Merely disgusted that a piddling corner of degenerates thinks it can dictate my thoughts and actions. I can deal with them sucking face in public if they can deal with being called names. Guess which one cannot endure such a Tremendous Injustice

      hint: faggot

    3. Re:No, you fat faggot by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Nobody is trying to "dictate your thoughts and actions," except when they exceed socially accepted norms. Same as if you think you're entitled to steal, you'll find that society can in fact dictate your actions. Heck, even stop signs and red lights dictate your actions. So why is it acceptable that inanimate objects, that don't have any sentience, can demand respect, but humans can't?

      You're not a special snowflake. You don't get to promote hatred without consequences.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    4. Re:No, you fat faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Life is a 2-way street, and you don't get to be a deviant without consequences.

    5. Re:No, you fat faggot by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Life is a 2-way street, and you don't get to be a deviant without consequences.

      Ture - but now that the pendulum has shifted, it's those who hate on transsexuals who are the deviants. Enjoy your consequences.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    6. Re:No, you fat faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, you mean all ZERO consequences, despite your frilly pink hopes? Sure. And you enjoy being stared at, having biological complications and getting inferiour health care.

      Ta.

    7. Re:No, you fat faggot by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Look at how many of you h8ters have to hide your identities, because you know that there would be real-world consequences if you came out of the closet with your bigotry against trans-women. Job loss is a real risk, because you would create a toxic work environment.

      And no, you keep confusing us with drag queens and cross-dressers. They're the ones going around in pink frilly clothes as part of their sexual fantasies. Today it's t-shirt, shorts, and runners, same as most women, because it's frigging hot!. Stared at? Only by horny men - it's not like they can tell my past by looking.

      One day you'll slip up, and there WILL be consequences. Not that I really give a shit - I'm secure enough in who I am that I've done news interviews on tv and radio, and I go by my legal name here, unlike you.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    8. Re:No, you fat faggot by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Oh hi, I'm Ash!

      I think you should take a step back a moment and reassess the situation going on in these posts.

      Look at how many of you h8ters have to hide your identities, because you know that there would be real-world consequences if you came out of the closet with your bigotry against trans-women.

      This is exactly what this type of troll want you to think about them, they really don't give a shit and are just trying to get a rise out of people like you. By responding in any form, you are encouraging them further. It is no different from when they would post anti-Semitic content to get a rise out of Jews despite genuinely not holding any beliefs being described.

      Not that I really give a shit - I'm secure enough in who I am that I've done news interviews on tv and radio, and I go by my legal name here, unlike you.

      I suggest you don't give them fuel for them to belittle and criticize you further. This sort of thing is what generates what maybe hurtful memes for you in communities like 4chan.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    9. Re:No, you fat faggot by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Oh, I WANT to encourage them. Embolden them to be as out in their hate as they can be - it's the best way to expose them for what they are, rather than having people give them the benefit of the doubt.

      They can't hurt me. What are they going to do - out me? Already been done, and it was a mostly positive experience, both on the net and in real life. In the end, they can't hurt anyone except those who live in places where it's legal to discriminate against transsexuals. And the only way to change that is to so embolden them that the general public sees the haters for what they are and gets enraged enough to demand that the law be changed. Us asking to change it won't work - we just don't have the numbers. Transgenders are a minority, and transsexuals an even smaller and more vulnerable minority.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    10. Re:No, you fat faggot by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Also (see original subject line above) who cares about someone's sexual orientation any more? Straight, gay, lesbian, cisgender or transgender, if people were to boycott all the businesses that support us, they'd have almost nowhere to shop. So really, what if, instead of being a transsexual woman, I was a gay man? Or a lesbian? Just what do they think would be wrong with that anyway?

      Back on topic - they are concentrating on Chelsea Manning's identity, and not her actions, because her actions are believed to be justified by many people in many countries. The "my country, right or wrong" days are long gone.

      They also don't want to understand that transition isn't a choice - it's what you do when you realize that you have no choice. This whole "she chose to get a sex change to get out of prison early" is a serious misrepresentation. If she had wanted to get out early, or maybe even avoid being tried, all she had to do was agree to give them everything about Assange. There's lots of people with a hard-on against Assange and Wikileaks. Mostly, people who have been exposed for wrong-doing.

      If she ever decides to go into politics ... :-) After all, anyone has to be better than Trump.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    11. Re:No, you fat faggot by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Embolden them to be as out in their hate as they can be - it's the best way to expose them for what they are, rather than having people give them the benefit of the doubt.

      That may work if your harasser isn't a troll that isn't motivated at all by what they're saying.

      As a level 97 troll with +61 perception, +9 intelligence and -4 Dexterity, I am telling you, these are troll posts by people that don't care by what they are spouting at you. The hate here and now in this thread does not actually exist, take a step back and reassess the situation for what it is.

      They can't hurt me. What are they going to do - out me?

      Possibly nothing or alternatively, you'll be the next "Shia Labeouf" they start manipulating.

      And the only way to change that is to so embolden them that the general public sees the haters for what they are and gets enraged enough to demand that the law be changed.

      The problem here is that you're making an assumption they hate you. They don't, they don't even believe in the things they're talking about. It's about getting you to do something meme/lulz worthy.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    12. Re:No, you fat faggot by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Slashdot isn't the place it used to be, back when I was trolling the trolls under my birth name. Today the trolls are lame. Still, once in a while they'll raise a point that needs to be thought through so that it can be quickly and properly smacked down in the future ... so why not? It's not like they're capable of embarrassing me or anything.

      And the idiots posting fake pictures of me, well, anyone interested can find real pictures of me as well as news clips, etc. So again, what, me worry?

      And it's impossible to dox me - I already published my home address, etc., just to show that it really doesn't change anything when Briana Wu was making up lies about being doxxed, etc. People seem to forget that we had these things called phone books that contained everyone's name, address, and phone number and everyone survived.

      Kind of hard to harm someone who is impossible to embarrass, who has no secrets (except passwords and PIN numbers), and has been attacked by the far better trolls of the days of Slashdot's glory, and cut their teeth trolling on USENET. :-)

      You may have noticed that every once in a while, one or another of the trans women will also throw in their two cents - we really have nothing to be ashamed of, and we're becoming bolder about it every day. So the more they throw rocks, the more it indirectly helps the cause.

      Besides, the current generation of trolls just doesn't get it. For example, they can't do subtlety. Or lay the groundwork for 6 months before the great chain yanking. They're like Donald Trump - incompetent.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    13. Re:No, you fat faggot by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Today the trolls are lame.

      Many are, there is very little intellectual wit involved anymore, although Slashdot rarely saw any of that trolling either.

      Still, once in a while they'll raise a point that needs to be thought through so that it can be quickly and properly smacked down in the future ... so why not? It's not like they're capable of embarrassing me or anything.

      Shia Labeouf wasn't "triggered" or messed with through the use of doxing or knowing his real name. It was through messing with his personality which resulted in him producing campaigns that ended up twisted and embarrassing himself when they would manipulate other individuals into wrecking those campaigns and succeeding.

      You may have noticed that every once in a while, one or another of the trans women will also throw in their two cents - we really have nothing to be ashamed of, and we're becoming bolder about it every day.

      That's sort of what I what I was warning you about in the previous posts to a certain extent.

      So the more they throw rocks, the more it indirectly helps the cause.

      They're not interested in damaging or helping the cause, they're looking for entertainment.

      Besides, the current generation of trolls just doesn't get it. For example, they can't do subtlety. Or lay the groundwork for 6 months before the great chain yanking.

      They don't need to, there are plenty of "lolcows".

      Anyway, I feel I've sufficiently informed you regarding the type of nefarious motives being used here. It's up to you to choose what you do with that information. My only motive in my posts was to get you to step back and identify what types of comments these were as you didn't appear to be handling them for what they were.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    14. Re:No, you fat faggot by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The trolls may be "getting their entertainment", but it's backfiring wrt society in general (plus I derive a certain entertainment myself catching them in their contradictions and lies - gotta keep the grey matter active with new challenges). The fact that they're always being openly challenged nowadays shows how times have changed. They are losing traction at a tremendous rate - to the point where the only real emotional response they generate (at least with me) is laughter at their pitiful state.

      And that's one thing trolls can't stand - failing to generate any really visceral emotional reaction that they can play on. That they want to make the focus on Manning's gender transition instead of the real story turns out to be useful - it shows that they don't feel that they can exploit Manning's actions because even they recognize that she has the moral high ground, and once again shines a spotlight on bigotry. Both of these are good things. About time the internet did something positive :-)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    15. Re:No, you fat faggot by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      The fact that they're always being openly challenged nowadays shows how times have changed.

      My general experience on Twitter, Mastodon, Tumblr and Facebook is usually the opposite...

      And that's one thing trolls can't stand - failing to generate any really visceral emotional reaction that they can play on.

      Most level 1 trolls in my experience are just happy to get responses out of people and see if it leads somewhere. They don't use wit, they use quantity.

      focus on Manning's gender transition

      They actually don't care about the focus, they're just hunting "lolcows".

      once again shines a spotlight on bigotry

      It pushes bigotry into a non-issue because people redefine the issue as trolling, except for those who have an agenda such as Briana Wu, who would like to make it about 'sexism'. You are starting to tread that line too. This fuels certain sides against you because they can identify you're being trolled and you're reusing it to sell a narrative and in their view, 'making shit up'. This is providing further "lulz" while the situation then escalates to stuff like the Berkeley protests of Yiannopoulos.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    16. Re:No, you fat faggot by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      What can I say - "silly rabbit, twitter is for twits"? I really don't get what all the fuss is about. I know why news media follows it - it's cheaper than doing any real reporting, same as all those stupid youtube videos that they "report" on - in the news!!!???WTF Pretty much the definition of "fake news", because of financial cutbacks. In all seriousness, people need to take what happens on the internet less seriously. It's not real,

      There's plenty of research that has shown the connection between excessive social media use and mental illness. Look no further than President Cheetos. Those who think it has any real effect in the real world are deluded - it only affects you if you let it.

      If you pretend to swallow the bait for a while, then ask why they're so interested in what's (not) in my panties rather than the current topic of discussion, they don't really have an answer. And when they continue, "can't attack the message, so you attack the messenger" - as they're doing in the case of Chelsea Manning - has no effective response. Kind of deprives them of the lulz and makes what they thought were tiny victories into "turdles".

      That's why they keep on trying. They're pitiful.

      As for Briana Wu, she pretends to be a feminist to hide the fact that she used to be a guy. It's an old trick, and it hasn't improved with age. Pretty much the essence of internalized transphobia and self-hate. We saw that with the Q and A a while back. She doesn't represent the typical transsexual who, once outed, suddenly finds that their biggest worry - that they'll be outed - is gone. No more waiting for the other shoe to drop, and a lot more freedom to speak your mind without worrying you'll say to much and give yourself away.

      The trolls will never get it - but others will, including others who are currently living in fear of being found out. I've seen it happen, and it's a GOOD THING (tm) :-P

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  130. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

    You're such a sad little douche. I really feel sorry for you. :-(

  131. Whistleblower is not another name Trator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whistleblowers would/should have attempted to do something about it in a legally justifiable way. This was outright treason.

    1. Re:Whistleblower is not another name Trator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if that doesn't work, cherry pick a couple of the most obvious documents and release those, dumping a shitload of stuff unrelated to the thing you thing is wrong is treason.

  132. Re: remain an active duty? so this he she will get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i can haz one 2

  133. Re:Freak show by penandpaper · · Score: 1

    a chimp behind the wheel of a jumbo jet.

    You may not like the destination but the ride is fun.

  134. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by budgenator · · Score: 1

    However, with regard to the mess in Syria, Putin is solidly on Assad's side and would undoubtedly pass on any information obtained from the USA to Assad if he thought it would help Assad stay in power. And Assad is a pretty bad dude so, all else being equal, it wouldn't be ideal for the USA to be helping Russia keep Assad in power.

    Sadly, most countries in the middle east either have a pretty bad dude running them, are looking for a pretty bad dude to run them or have multiple pretty bad dudes competing for the job.
    Maybe Trump figures the genocidal maniac we know is better than the genocidal maniac we don't know.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  135. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by penandpaper · · Score: 1

    The irony of your post is that journalism and MSM have fallen so far that the Goldwater rule is no longer in effect... because reasons.

    Journalists cannot interview loved ones and family members because their feelings will get in the way of honest reporting. Yet, a journalist can be filled with hate and contempt toward the interviewee and it's A-OKay.

  136. Re:remain an active duty? so this he she will get by budgenator · · Score: 1

    remain an active duty? so this he she will get VA! This trader should have life and be happy that they did not get death by firing squad!

    "Hi Chelsea, I'm your VA surgeon assigned to preform your gender reassignment surgery; don't worry, even though I've never done this before, I looked at the pictures in my old text books and watched a couple youtube videos. Now if something goes wrong, do you wish to be an organ donor?"

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  137. Re:That's ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are incorrect, Bernie never would have had the guy shot.

  138. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    lol OK, though I don't believe you :)

    Seriously though, simply making shit up isn't a view point. Your "view" about progressives is simply invented.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  139. Re:Enlistment is not forever by budgenator · · Score: 1

    Summary is bullshit. Enlistment is not forever. The military can only hold him in service until the end of his enlistment term. Once his enlistment term is over, the military can't do anything to him.

    Officers are another story. Being an officer *is* forever, and you can be called back at any time.

    Wrong there is always an "At the Government's convenience " clause in your contract; ETS means Estimated Termination of Service, Estimated being the operative word.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  140. Re:Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least it will make it to the ground in one piece so we can change pilots.

  141. Re:Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're Greek and you think Manning is sexually confused? Your entire culture and society is based upon people fucking anything and everything alive (or maybe dead if the body was still warm).

  142. Re:Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least Pence isn't incompetent. Trump has no fucking idea what he's doing. It's like putting a chimp behind the wheel of a jumbo jet.

    I still can't believe we chose incompetent over evil.

    But we did.

    Now we have to live with it.

  143. "He" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Manning is a "He", not a "She". It doesnt matter if he's had his penis cut off and turned inside out, he's still a dude... now with no penis.

  144. Re: Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did they write in "Grovel to the French to come and save us" anywhere in there too ?

    That's what usually happens.

  145. Re: Freak show by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

    Obama

    socialist agenda

    Why do people always fall back on this? If you knew even the first thing about politics, you would know that's blatantly and utterly false.

    Obama was to the right of Reagan on a number of issues.

    --
    Eat the rich.
  146. No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. Seven years late.

  147. Re: Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You chose incompetent narcissist over competent narcissist. Evil is relative, I'd rather be more precise.

  148. Re: Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're being a racist because you called the AC a racist without knowing if the AC was from Greece or not!

  149. Re: Freak show by demonlapin · · Score: 1

    Well, it worked. Not my preferred method, but hey, any port in a storm.

  150. Re:Freak show by walterhpdx · · Score: 1

    KFC Gravy is the second most disgusting food known to man

    ::sigh:: I keep telling my husband that. But then we go to KFC and he orders "a bowl of chicken soup". No potatoes or anything - just the gravy. So gross.

  151. Re:Freak show by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    At the rate the liberals are going, Pence will be running as incumbent after the impeachment.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  152. Re: Freak show by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    On the "there is no difference between the Kremlin and the New York Stock Exchange" scale, I certainly see a lot of socialism in the way Obama gave insurance companies a lot of captive business in 2014.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  153. Re:Freak show by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Why do you consider transsexuals to be "sexually confused?" Don't you know half are straight?

    What does "straight" have to do with it? I have friends and family who aren't straight, and they're not confused. They know what their biological sex is, what their gender is, and who they're attracted to.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  154. Re:That's ok... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    That sir/madam, is a fair point.

    --
    -Styopa
  155. Re:Freak show by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    The original poster claimed Chelsea Manning was "sexually confused", not "gender confused." The confusion started in their mind, not anyone else's. It's like the ones calling transsexuals faggots. Some are straight, some are bi, some are gay, some are lesbian, some are asexual. Nowadays who cares - except ignorant people like the poster I was replying to. I certainly don't.

    It's not like there's a right choice and a wrong choice - because there is no "choice" involved, just a dawning realization that you accept, embrace, and extend :-)

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  156. Ms Manning released from prison by mhenriday · · Score: 1

    'Chelsea Manning Set To Be Released From Prison, 28 Years Early' Not, in fact, 28 years early, but rather, 7 years late. Rather than imprisoned, she should have been awarded a medal for providing incontrovertible evidence as to what the US military was doing in Iraq.... Henri

  157. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Yup. Was Reagan fit to be president by the late 80s? There were a lot of rumors that Nancy was running the show (other rumors saying it was based on what her astrologer told her).

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  158. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    It's possible to be at war without declaring war. We were at war with the Japanese on December 7, 1941, before either side had issued a declaration. Since the formation of the UN organization, the words in use have changed, but it's still war. The post-WWII wars we've been in had Congressional authorization without a formal declaration.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  159. Re:When leaking national secrets was cool by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    I don't know what the laws were in place, but the President doesn't have carte blanche to ignore laws. However, there's plenty to impeach Trump on. If and when to do it is a purely political decision (and it would be if there wasn't plenty to impeach him on).

    As usual, Trump supporters use false equivalence. Obama shared intelligence with the Russians, sure, but that doesn't mean that any transfer of intelligence to Putin is either legal or a good idea.

    Intelligence agencies have statutory authority and duties, which don't necessarily include doing whatever the heck the President wants. Besides, not telling the President something is nowhere near treason.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  160. Re: Freak show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you meant to say, "KFC gravy is the second most *delicious* food known to man". Of course KFC gravy is second only to KFC mash potatoes.

  161. Active duty? by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Surprised they didn't send him/her to the most dangerous place in the world (besides Detroit). Lot's of places where your life isn't worth a nickle.

  162. Re: Freak show by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

    You mean crony capitalism.

    --
    Eat the rich.
  163. Re: Freak show by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Crony capitalism, communism, there's no real difference.

    And the only difference between a libertarian and a crony capitalist is having enough money to hire a lobbyist.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  164. So? by iq145 · · Score: 1

    Let it out of a men's prison and throw it into a women's prison!