Totally different situation. You did exactly what you're supposed to. Not everyone is capable of completing college. To lie to them and tell them everyone has the same trouble that they do is not the correct solution. Those people will just just out a year later even worse off financially and mentally then they would have had they not been lied to.
I agree with you about the Army being good about race relations. But the army is very colorblind. Progressivism most certainly is not. I think liberal not Liberal is a better description.
You don't get it. The name of the organization is "The Race". And it advocates for attorneys and law to benefit one particular ethnicity. That's not acceptable anymore. If something like that is unacceptable for one ethnicity it is unacceptable for all. If you think otherwise, then you are by definition a racist.
No you're racist because the judge belongs to a group called La Raza. I'm positive that if the judge was white and belonged to a group called "The Race" all of you idiots would be screaming racism and that he's not capable of impartiality.
We're not talking about the system. We're talking about one judge and one defendant. If you take a few minutes to look at the judge's background, there are many things that could lead one to believe that he is not impartial.
Yeah, I went to college too. It's a lot of bullshit. If one ethnicity who wields power can be biased, then so can another. You have to be deliberately ignorant to not understand that.
You don't get it. The Republican is always conveniently unabashedly racist. As long as that is the case, it is not necessary to argue substance or look at the faults of any of the other candidates. Also, if the guy you oppose is racist, it automatically makes you morally superior and just a good all around person. No need to use reason or actually objectively look at the candidates.
It's interesting that in that whole wiki, the word socialism is never used, and the word socialist is only used once in refernce to an actual socialist political party. And if you were to go here The word socialist is only used in reference to the relationship the anarchists had with socialists. They were two separate and distinct groups. We've had this discussion before. You were wrong then, just as you are now.
You can't be socialist and anarchist. The definition of socialism is state ownership of the means of production. What you are talking about is a social anarchy.
I think that's the people rioting who would be to blame. If I swing my fists wildly, and you happen to get your face in the way, that's still my fault. There's no excuse for the violence of the left.
Slashdot Mirror
Organizations like the NAACP are without a doubt racist. Veterans organizations not so much. And the rest of your comment is ridiculous.
Totally different situation. You did exactly what you're supposed to. Not everyone is capable of completing college. To lie to them and tell them everyone has the same trouble that they do is not the correct solution. Those people will just just out a year later even worse off financially and mentally then they would have had they not been lied to.
...just keep digging. Lie to yourself that eventually you'll get yourself out and everything will be ok.
I agree with you about the Army being good about race relations. But the army is very colorblind. Progressivism most certainly is not. I think liberal not Liberal is a better description.
The leader of your country doesn't like white people and doesn't like Jewish people.
You don't get it. The name of the organization is "The Race". And it advocates for attorneys and law to benefit one particular ethnicity. That's not acceptable anymore. If something like that is unacceptable for one ethnicity it is unacceptable for all. If you think otherwise, then you are by definition a racist.
No you're racist because the judge belongs to a group called La Raza. I'm positive that if the judge was white and belonged to a group called "The Race" all of you idiots would be screaming racism and that he's not capable of impartiality.
I'm pretty sure that's exactly what he pointed out. In my experience, people who see racism everywhere they look are actually the racists.
We're not talking about the system. We're talking about one judge and one defendant. If you take a few minutes to look at the judge's background, there are many things that could lead one to believe that he is not impartial.
Yeah, I went to college too. It's a lot of bullshit. If one ethnicity who wields power can be biased, then so can another. You have to be deliberately ignorant to not understand that.
Thanks for illustrating my point so well.
Black people say white juries, cops, and judges, can't be impartial all the time. I don't see any inconsistency here.
You don't get it. The Republican is always conveniently unabashedly racist. As long as that is the case, it is not necessary to argue substance or look at the faults of any of the other candidates. Also, if the guy you oppose is racist, it automatically makes you morally superior and just a good all around person. No need to use reason or actually objectively look at the candidates.
It's interesting that in that whole wiki, the word socialism is never used, and the word socialist is only used once in refernce to an actual socialist political party. And if you were to go here The word socialist is only used in reference to the relationship the anarchists had with socialists. They were two separate and distinct groups. We've had this discussion before. You were wrong then, just as you are now.
Aren't you guys cute.
You can't be socialist and anarchist. The definition of socialism is state ownership of the means of production. What you are talking about is a social anarchy.
Ok, maybe you can.
No you can't.
Why would you want icky 93% lean? Ask any chef, 85% is where it's at.
I highly doubt many people making minimum wage in 2006 are still making minimum wage. MW jobs are generally held very briefly.
No you can't, and without a sale, you can't get ground beef for $3.05 either.
Yes it is. Without fail.
Where the hell are you getting beef for $3.05 a pound?
I think that's the people rioting who would be to blame. If I swing my fists wildly, and you happen to get your face in the way, that's still my fault. There's no excuse for the violence of the left.
Supplies wane? We hit peak oil 15 years ago. Didn't you read all the peer reviewed papers and listen to the consensus?