There were never charges that Nixon was responsible for the Burglary. In fact that was not in the articles of impeachment. It was the cover up, not the crime that did him in.
If you won't read the order how do you know the article is biased? It's pretty difficult to write an untruthful article with the original source placed front and center. What is much easier is not covering the story at all. You can go to CNN or any of the other traditional orgs for that.
The NYTimes and CNN aren't covering the story, so stop complaining about right-wing rags that are actually practicing journalism, and go read the actual judge's order.
I'm sure the NYTimes and Washington Post have reporters working in shifts on the story. Look, the actual judge's order is linked in the article. Just go read that and stop attacking the source.
It's not minorities. That's too broad a term. Clearly there are many minorities that are present or even overrepresented in silicon valley. Minorities and diversity are newspeak terms that only apply to African Americans and Hispanics. Get with the program.
You don't understand. Diversity doesn't mean Indians or Asians. It means more African Americans, women, and transgendered people, regardless of what portion they already make up.
If you didn't know the names or government positions of anyone in this picture and I were to ask you who is in charge, how would you answer? This is the single most revealing picture of the entire Obama (the guy who showed up late to meeting he wasn't invited to) presidency.
That may be what it is to you, but in reality it will always be something else. When you limit it to financial transactions you are talking about a highly adulterated system that has become less and less free. Of course it is full of problems.
Many of them are not anti-science. Making that assumption is a mistake. I've noticed many in our younger generations like to make that accusation of people they don't agree with or don't understand.
Slashdot Mirror
Would you take the DOJ admission to lying as fact?
So, are you saying that because he is the Birther Judge, the DOJ did not, in fact, lie in Federal Court?
There were never charges that Nixon was responsible for the Burglary. In fact that was not in the articles of impeachment. It was the cover up, not the crime that did him in.
If you can show me video of Trump or Hillary supporters throwing chairs, I will agree with you.
It most certainly does give context, if you read it.
So Elena Kagan should have recused herself in the ACA case. Got it.
The DOJ has stated otherwise.
They specifically told the judge they did not issue permits. As a result he did not issue an injunction. They lied. They will probably be disbarred.
If you won't read the order how do you know the article is biased? It's pretty difficult to write an untruthful article with the original source placed front and center. What is much easier is not covering the story at all. You can go to CNN or any of the other traditional orgs for that.
The NYTimes and CNN aren't covering the story, so stop complaining about right-wing rags that are actually practicing journalism, and go read the actual judge's order.
I'm sure the NYTimes and Washington Post have reporters working in shifts on the story. Look, the actual judge's order is linked in the article. Just go read that and stop attacking the source.
You don't count either, you're just an oppressor.
And on every college campus they get lumped in with the Diversity department.
It's not minorities. That's too broad a term. Clearly there are many minorities that are present or even overrepresented in silicon valley. Minorities and diversity are newspeak terms that only apply to African Americans and Hispanics. Get with the program.
You don't understand. Diversity doesn't mean Indians or Asians. It means more African Americans, women, and transgendered people, regardless of what portion they already make up.
I have your red swingline stapler. If you give me your address I'll mail it back to you. Please don't burn down my house.
If you didn't know the names or government positions of anyone in this picture and I were to ask you who is in charge, how would you answer? This is the single most revealing picture of the entire Obama (the guy who showed up late to meeting he wasn't invited to) presidency.
What makes you think Romeny was willing to pay? The "third party" was almost certainly an FBI agent.
You are an idiot.
You are not entitled to that wealth. In a fair system you are free to go out and create your own wealth.
Oh, they're definitely attempting to do exactly that
With more duties comes more power, bigger budgets, and more bureaucracy.
That may be what it is to you, but in reality it will always be something else. When you limit it to financial transactions you are talking about a highly adulterated system that has become less and less free. Of course it is full of problems.
Many of them are not anti-science. Making that assumption is a mistake. I've noticed many in our younger generations like to make that accusation of people they don't agree with or don't understand.
When every one of your posts is about "wingers", it becomes likely that you are the winger.
And I see you've been sufficiently brainwashed that you believe a fetus at 26 weeks is just a "cluster of cells".