Slashdot Mirror


Google Chrome To Disallow Backspace As a 'Back' Button (independent.co.uk)

An anonymous reader writes: Google Chrome is going to stop people from accidentally deleting everything they've been doing. A future version of the app will stop the backspace button from also functioning as a "back" button. The change has already been rolled out in some experimental versions of the app, and has upset some users. Developers have said that the feature is only being partly enabled for now, in case there is "sufficient outcry" and it needs to be rolled back. People regularly press the button thinking that they're deleting a word from a form, developers said, but then find that they weren't actually typing into that form and so accidentally go back, losing everything they've done.

348 comments

  1. app??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's /software/ or /application/ or /program/ !

    Now get off my lawn!

    1. Re:app??? by dejitaru · · Score: 1

      You do know that app is short for application, and the abbreviated version has been used since the early 90s (probably before too). If you don't believe me, do a search and you will see old computer magazines referring to programs as "apps"

    2. Re:app??? by Desler · · Score: 2

      App as a shorthand for application has been in use for over 30 years.

    3. Re: app??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sure, but it's tainted nowadays.

    4. Re: app??? by Desler · · Score: 0

      Are you three years old?

    5. Re:app??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though in the 90z we were looking for Appz on Warez sitez.

    6. Re:app??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one wants to use your luddite software. All app appers know that you app apps.

    7. Re:app??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC it was coined by John Dvorak in his PC Mag column, when he spoke of the spreadsheet as the "killer app" that set off a tide of personal computer sales.

    8. Re:app??? by VernonNemitz · · Score: 1

      The problem is mostly about typing into text box, when mouse-clicking outside the box is sometimes useful. I personally complained about the problem roughly three years ago, and am glad someone finally is deciding to do something about it.

    9. Re:app??? by John+Bokma · · Score: 2

      For example, RISC OS has an !Apps directory since the 90s.

    10. Re: app??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm terribly sorry if my opinion upset you. I understand some people on the Internet are ultrasensitive toward opinions that are not aligned with their own political or sexual orientations.

      Again, sorry for all the discomfort my inconsiderate comment brought to you.

    11. Re: app??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a killer app for sure. Kills all my interest in most presentations even now, decades later.

    12. Re:app??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It still bothers the crap out of me that somehow these skiddies grew up into pretend-journalists and turned "app" into a pseudo-technical term not synonymous with "application" and implying a lighter runtime or heavier reliance on virtual machines/web api's.

    13. Re: app??? by Desler · · Score: 0

      So that's a yes that you're an immature man-child?

    14. Re:app??? by driblio · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but only cos the ADFS limit was ten characters!

    15. Re:app??? by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      An app (application) is a program that either does something useful or lets you do something useful with it. Are utilities applications? Are media players? Are games?

      I've been using computers since the early 70s and I've never called a computer program an app. I never heard the word until smart phones were invented. Maybe some people used it, but I bet they were in the minority.

      Quite a few apps for phones are nothing more than a custom interface to a server. I have one on my phone that simply opens the browser to the mobile version of the website! That's what I'd call a link, not an app.

      When I hear people who can barely turn on a computer using words like "app" or "hashtag", it really gets on my nerves. "Let me pull that up on my browser" is another phrase that I cannot stand. And advertisers who say, "Log onto our website . . ." make me want to shoot them.

      End of rant . . . . . for now.

    16. Re:app??? by dejitaru · · Score: 1

      Thats the thing though, language changes, some things become more wide spread and some fade away. For example, I used to call programs "progs" and pirated software "warez", because that was a common way of saying it back then, especially during the AOL warez days. Now I never hear that term being used now, but i'm sure some people do.

    17. Re:app??? by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      But still the point stands, it was common in the 80s and 90s: http://www.osnews.com/story/24...

      I guess the AC's lawn belongs to his parents ;-)

    18. Re:app??? by Desler · · Score: 1

      Cool story, gramps. People have been calling applications "apps" since at least the mid 1980s. "Killer app" is, for example, a pretty old turn of phrase.

    19. Re:app??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree in principle, the war is lost. App is just the latest synonym for program. Getting annoyed about this is like getting annoyed about people who speak about everything in the present tense ("the year is 787 and the French are invading"), describe objects or events as very unique, or say literally when they mean metaphorically: futile and stressful.

    20. Re:app??? by spatley · · Score: 1

      So that is where you put the things that were not apps?

    21. Re: app??? by KuilinLi · · Score: 1

      Why are you so insistent on ad hominem attacks?

    22. Re: app??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By looking at your own comment history I believe it's evident what's going on. You're just jealous of him because he's a year older than you.

    23. Re: app??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mom told me they were your favorite.

    24. Re: app??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also short for appetizers so quit making me hungry

    25. Re: app??? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      That is not an ad hominem, just calling someone a name.

    26. Re: app??? by Bartles · · Score: 1

      I have your red swingline stapler. If you give me your address I'll mail it back to you. Please don't burn down my house.

    27. Re: app??? by Desler · · Score: 1

      Because it makes you butthurt?

    28. Re:app??? by Desler · · Score: 1

      Yeah the war was lost by around 1985.

    29. Re: app??? by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Somebody needs to lookup the definition of ad-hominem.

    30. Re:app??? by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      No, a directory starting with a ! is "magic". It could contain a !boot file (what to do when the filer sees the directory for the first time), a !run file (what to do when the directory is double clicked), a !sprites file (containing the icons, which can also used for the directory itself). See http://www.guidebookgallery.or... for an example.

    31. Re: app??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought "app" was short for "appetizer"... Like unlimited apps at applebees (AKA the apple store)

  2. Give the option by Ormy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Default behaviour should be backspace does NOT take you back a page. Leave a setting somewhere obvious to turn that particular function on again. Was that so hard?

    1. Re:Give the option by flopsquad · · Score: 2

      +8 solved in the first post awesome good work next issue!

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    2. Re:Give the option by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It was dumb to map backspace to back anyway. With Internet and browsers dominating existence, keyboards should be redesigned with common browser clickies built in and separate from editing keys.

      Objections? Consider your useless neck broken and your body left for the wolves.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re: Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      If there were an option for every setting on which users has varying opinions, the preferences page would be so cluttered that you'd get frustrated by the overly complex interface and complain even more loudly about that.

      c.f. sawfish vs metacity

    4. Re:Give the option by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      I don't use backspace but I DO use a LOT of hotkeys, so I sympathise with people who used backspace. I have been stung by this once or twice but 99% of the time nowadays the browsers are clever enough to cache EVERYTHING and you hit forward and it's all fixed.

      As you said though, how about an option for it?

      OOOOOOOOOPSIE DAISY! We're talking about god-damned-I-know-best-shut-your-idiot-mouth Chrome, where options are EVIL. They won't give you an option to do a god damned thing.

      They can have a fast and reliable browser all they like, I can't stand their philosophy and lack of flexibility and they demonstrate it time and time and time again.
      It will always be my secondary "flash player browser" for monitor #2 and nothing more.

      What next btw, will they take out spacebar to scroll a page? I admit there's probably only 5% of users who still use it but by god do I use it, hundreds of times a day. Needing my hand on my mouse endlessly to browse is agonising.

    5. Re: Give the option by yuriklastalov · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Found the Google interface designer!

      "We don't put options in our apps because it would confuse your silly little heads. Now go out and play little one."

      It's the Applesque "We know whats best" design methodology. And it sucks.

    6. Re: Give the option by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Or just take the Firefox advanced mode which is just a bunch of properties or allow it via an extension? Now about the address bar... ;)

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    7. Re: Give the option by Radish03 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, the interface designer said "Screw it. Just put them all in a huge list, but make sure it's pretty hidden."

      see chrome:flags

    8. Re:Give the option by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 1

      Exactly! I don't understand why browsers these days like to hide choice from the user, smh. Luckily, there's a Vivaldi for that now.

    9. Re:Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      There used to be a set of golden rule guides on good GUI design. Some of the rules were:

      1. Make every window consistent.
      2. Ensure that every window has a [CANCEL], exit without changing anything button
      3. Ensure that "dangerous" options are separated well away from "harmless" options.
      4. Ensure that anything that could be undone was guarded with a "confirm" and with a timeout
      5. Ensure that the user was queried when they tried to leave without saving work.
      6. Ensure that backup copies were saved somewhere permanent and not somewhere temporary like /tmp
      7. Use internationally recognised symbols wherever possible

    10. Re: Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If there were an option for every setting on which users has varying opinions, the preferences page would be so cluttered that you'd get frustrated by the overly complex interface and complain even more loudly about that.

      Uh, what?
      How hard is it to have a single tab/page for "keyboard shortcuts/hotkeys"?
      Plenty of UI's do exactly that.

    11. Re:Give the option by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the people who have been asking for MRU tab-switching for ages

      Chrome doesn't even allow plugins to enable MRU for ctrl+tab.

    12. Re:Give the option by lgw · · Score: 4, Informative

      It was dumb to map backspace to back anyway. With Internet and browsers dominating existence, keyboards should be redesigned with common browser clickies built in and separate from editing keys.

      Objections? Consider your useless neck broken and your body left for the wolves.

      And thus the wheel of pain spins full circle. Mainframe terminals have always worked this way. The terminal is sent a non-web form, the user enters some data in fields with Tab and Return serving only and always to move the cursor around. Once you're done, there was a separate "Xmit" key to post the form.

      Form submission was always explicit, and entirely compatible with high-speed touch-typists.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:Give the option by Hentes · · Score: 1

      I didn't even know you can't rebind keys in Chrome. I know that it's also not an option in Firefox. Why is it that browser makers have so much trouble implementing a basic feature that exists in nearly every other piece of UI software?

    14. Re: Give the option by Ormy · · Score: 2

      If there were an option for every setting on which users has varying opinions, the preferences page would be so cluttered that you'd get frustrated by the overly complex interface and complain even more loudly about that.

      c.f. sawfish vs metacity

      So we should abolish all user choice until every interface is basically iOS? No thanks, I prefer a huge selection of well-categorised settings to explore and personalise, its my favourite part of getting new software and usually hardware too (I'm not joking). The only reason I'm still on windows is because I can lose endless hours playing with regedit, who needs videogames? (Ok somewhat joking that time)

    15. Re:Give the option by Livius · · Score: 1

      How did it take so long for this *bug* to get fixed?

    16. Re:Give the option by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      I heavily use hotkeys, too. However, I would have never guessed that anyone would map backspace to that function.

      In every browser I can remember using, it's always been Alt+LeftArrow. I figure that's good enough to leave unconfigurable.

    17. Re:Give the option by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      I think it's a terrible hotkey, backspace? It's an awful idea, pretty sure I use ALT back as well. That being said, when people fuck with your workflow, it's frustrating.

      Chrome loves to not give a shit about standards or let people customise things. They are as arrogant as Apple.

    18. Re:Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, backspace was never the issue, going forward is.

    19. Re:Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Google has a really bad habit of making choices for users instead of giving choices to users.

      They should also fix their browser instead of trying to hide the problem. If going back a page wipes out forms, then why don't they fix the browser history to make it NOT wipe out forms? Form data can be purged when the tab or browser is closed.

    20. Re:Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Google we're talking about. You know, the people who came up with garbage like material design and the burger menu. They also violate consistency by hijacking right click on most of their sites.

    21. Re:Give the option by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      Was that so hard?

      It's not that it's hard, it's that after so many years of having if() statements spread all through out the code to handle very minor use cases, code become unwieldy. Around the same time users complain that your program is "bloated", and having so many options is confusing. So when you have a situation that annoys 99% of your user base, but 1% like (but honestly can do without), you make the decision to remove the if() statement, so the code can be leaner and cleaner.

    22. Re: Give the option by Black+LED · · Score: 1

      That's why you choose default settings that "most" people will use but allow everything to be customised by those who want to.

    23. Re:Give the option by byornski · · Score: 1

      "You can set the Integer pref browser.backspace_action to 2 on the about:config page to disable the backspace action. BTW Shift + Backspace does the reverse: going Forward if possible, so that is taken as well." https://support.mozilla.org/en...

    24. Re:Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Luckily, there's a Vivaldi for that now.

      You're kidding, right? Vivaldi doesn't even conform to my UI theme like every other browser and program does and there is no setting to make it do so.

      I use Pale Moon because I can make it work exactly the way I want. No other browser comes close.

    25. Re:Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be an amateur/shitty coder. The proper way is you have the configuration write out a hardcoded behavior script that handles all of that.

    26. Re:Give the option by justthinkit · · Score: 3

      8. Have discoverable interfaces -- way gone from Chrome
      9. Be usable by keyboard and mouse -- increasingly gone in many programs, especially frequently updated ones desperately trying to be hip

      --
      I come here for the love
    27. Re:Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a chrome user so I have to ask: was backspace == back button really default behaviour? Because if so that's possibly the dumbest thing I've heard of in a long time (except for the bonnet glue story, obviously... that took stupid to a whole new level).

    28. Re:Give the option by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I think it's a terrible hotkey, backspace? It's an awful idea, pretty sure I use ALT back as well. That being said, when people fuck with your workflow, it's frustrating.

      Chrome loves to not give a shit about standards or let people customise things. They are as arrogant as Apple.

      Right. those arrogant bastards at Apple won't let you configure ANYTHING like Keyboard Shortcuts....

    29. Re:Give the option by mcswell · · Score: 1

      Google doesn't believe in giving users any choices. Want a real menu in Chrome? Sorry, if you're on a Windows machine, no can have. Want to use '+' to tag words that must appear in searches? Sorry, now you have to use quotes, and who knows what that does if you want to get inflected forms (+dog should give you hits with dogs, "dog" should not). Want the old Google Maps or Google News interface? Outa luck.

      Google; they know what's good for you better than you do.

    30. Re: Give the option by mcswell · · Score: 1

      Amen, brother. Wish I had mod points to give...

    31. Re:Give the option by mcswell · · Score: 1

      "1% like (but honestly can do without)" Yeap, by using a different program.

    32. Re:Give the option by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Yes, what was the point of it anyway, given every single browser ever uses the universal ALT-Left to go back?

      Were they just trying to be different?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    33. Re:Give the option by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The backspace key, is used as back in browsers, I am stunned. In the decades of using computer today was the very first time I did it, seriously, did not even know, just seems so odd a concept it never occurred to me.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    34. Re:Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Default behaviour should be backspace does NOT take you back a page. Leave a setting somewhere obvious to turn that particular function on again. Was that so hard?

      You've never worked QA on a long-lived product, I see.

    35. Re: Give the option by NuShrike · · Score: 1

      Vivaldi browser. Brings back the old school Opera with preferences for everything.

    36. Re: Give the option by NuShrike · · Score: 2

      Or don't let you back out of a form without confirmation, as many sites already do.

      How about ALSO disabling pull-to-refresh when you're on a form, which is the SAME problem.

      Maybe they'll get to this in 20 years.

    37. Re:Give the option by AbRASiON · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Talk about semantics, lol.

      Apple staunchly block access and configuration to ALL kinds of things, it's "Apples way or the highway" with a SHITLOAD of their devices and software. It's why Android boomed at the start.

      To try and defend them of this, on the semantics of one thing is laughable. You're fighting a battle which was lost years ago.

    38. Re:Give the option by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      It always was stupid - although to be fair, it was probably made so long ago, that the idea of submitting data in a webpage was probably a new or even nonexistent concept.

      I for one don't use it or like it, but by god as someone 'oppressed' with idiot changes in UI, I'll argue for those who DO want it, to be able to have it.

    39. Re: Give the option by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Android boomed because it was a cheaper way of doing what the iPhone could do.

    40. Re: Give the option by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Found the Google interface designer!

      "We don't put options in our apps because it would confuse your silly little heads. Now go out and play little one."

      It's the Applesque "We know whats best" design methodology. And it sucks.

      Ironic, given that Apple uses the Backspace key as the Delete key.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    41. Re:Give the option by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the Chrome developers have some horrible aversion to preferences. If that weren't the case this issue would have been resolved many years ago.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    42. Re:Give the option by amRadioHed · · Score: 2

      Microsoft, you mean. This feature started in IE and all the other browsers copied it from there.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    43. Re: Give the option by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Android boomed because it could do what iPhone couldn't. Like copy&paste.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    44. Re: Give the option by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      The flags are all intended to be temporary while they are testing features.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    45. Re:Give the option by Kickasso · · Score: 1

      The word "setting" is probably NSFW at Google now.

    46. Re:Give the option by Qwertie · · Score: 1

      Backspace is a "back" key?! Honestly, all these years I've been using the IE shortcut Alt+Left. Guess this explains why occasionally the browser mysteriously leaves a page I was typing on. I have one of those laptop touchpads that randomly click while you're trying to type so ... accidental clicks plus backspace is a dangerous thing.

    47. Re: Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still, ever check the list of Outlook options? Mark message as read can happen as the message is open or after I leave it. Which interacts in funny ways with other obscure settings - which is the actual problem.

      And no, I do not look forward to basically programming the UI behaviour for every application I use. Use someone else's computer and the interface is all different? Not good.

      That silly Backspace thing is not in Firefox by the way... but I remember being bitten by it. Awful feature.

    48. Re:Give the option by psmears · · Score: 1

      Yes, what was the point of it anyway, given every single browser ever uses the universal ALT-Left to go back?

      Were they just trying to be different?

      Since every single browser also supports Backspace to go back, they were hardly being different!

    49. Re:Give the option by mjpaci · · Score: 1

      Well...was coming here to post the same thought. Thank you.

      If you have a behavior in an app (application/software/program/whatever) that a third of the users want, a third don't want, and a third without a clue...it should be an option.

    50. Re:Give the option by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      I'm not a chrome user so I have to ask: was backspace == back button really default behaviour? Because if so that's possibly the dumbest thing I've heard of in a long time (except for the bonnet glue story, obviously... that took stupid to a whole new level).

      It's been the default behavior of every major browser since around Netscape 3 / IE 4.

      I don't get what the big deal is, pay attention to the focus of the cursor and it's not a problem. Backspace never has and doesn't now, jump you out of a form field.

      Using a variety of browsers with wildly different UIs, the backspace is useful when searching for something in a mystery-meat poorly designed for mobile web site. Mashing the button is faster than locating where ever the idiots decided to put the back and forward buttons this week on that browser.

    51. Re:Give the option by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Why the hell they settled on Back Space and left the Escape Key just sitting there just beggars belief. But then again why did we go from using Enter/Return on a control to move to the next control and decided to go with Tab instead?

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    52. Re: Give the option by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      No, it's because this would be trivial to implement as an extension. Why bloat up the browser with options hardly anyone uses, when you can just use extensions?

      Mozilla made this mistake. Hundreds of options means billions of possible configurations, and a testing nightmare. Then they try to slim it down and take stuff away (like spaces) and people moan that they are ripping features out. Meanwhile Chrome has a stable, secure extension system that mitigates 99% of these problems.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    53. Re: Give the option by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I imagine Google wants to disable OnUnload() functionality that is used to display those "are you sure you want to abandon this form?" messages. It's wide open to abuse and quite annoying. Surely it's better to just design the UI so that it doesn't let the user accidentally destroy their work with a single very common key stroke.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    54. Re:Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Backspace acting as a back button is pretty common practice, you just apparently never noticed it. It's not something confined to Chrome.

    55. Re:Give the option by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Since every single browser also supports Backspace to go back, they were hardly being different!

      By "every single browser" I assume you mean "Opera stupidly".

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    56. Re:Give the option by psmears · · Score: 1

      Since every single browser also supports Backspace to go back, they were hardly being different!

      By "every single browser" I assume you mean "Opera stupidly".

      No - Firefox supports it; IE and Edge support it; Safari supported it prior to version 6; as you mention, Opera supports it... it's hardly a Chrome innovation :-)

    57. Re:Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is Google we're talking about. You know, the people who came up with garbage like material design and the burger menu. They also violate consistency by hijacking right click on most of their sites.

      The 'burger' menu first appeared on the Xerox PARC. You know, the first GUI ever?

    58. Re: Give the option by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression one can catch the backspace keypress event triggered on the body tag and prevent its default action, negating this need.

    59. Re: Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Working with a former Apple designer...
      My god his designs suck. Constantly putting light colored text on a similar light colored background so that you cant read a damn thing. Putting thing behind 'buttons' that don't give any indication they are buttons so you have no idea that you could actually click on them to get to something. Insists everything needs to be how 'iOS does it' even tho iOS doesn't do it that way and many top rated apps do it how we are doing it.
      It is truly hell

    60. Re:Give the option by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      They did not leave the Escape Key just sitting there - it is used to STOP the page from doing what backspace tries to do. In general, stop loading whatever is being loaded.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    61. Re:Give the option by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      4. Ensure that anything that could not be undone was guarded with a "confirm" and with a timeout

      FTFY?

      And how about

      8. Don't override standard windowing controls to do something else.

      Skype is so frustrating in that regard. The Close and Minimize window buttons both minimize, as well as File>Close. The only way to actually exit the damn thing is through the system tray menu.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    62. Re: Give the option by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      It's called about:config.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    63. Re: Give the option by TangoMargarine · · Score: 2

      That silly Backspace thing is not in Firefox by the way

      browser.backspace_action

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    64. Re:Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The default behavior should be for the back button to take you back to the previous page in exactly the state it was in when you left it, without loading anything or executing any additional javascript (that's totally fine with the RFCs). I'd even demand for it to return to the state of the previous page before the onunload event fired (not sure if the relevant RFCs even cover that). The forward button should do the same. It's so aggravating to go back to a from you have painstakingly filled in just to see a stupid onload JavaScript carefully clear every single form field, one after the other.

    65. Re:Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MRU = most recently used

    66. Re:Give the option by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Solving the wrong problem, but okay.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    67. Re:Give the option by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      They had to put the Stop functionality *somewhere* after they made the window button context-sensitive.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    68. Re:Give the option by davros74 · · Score: 1

      Regarding number 3, I have always wondering why, after all these years, Microsoft still has the window close button right next to Maximize, and worse, why Eject is still right next to Format.

    69. Re: Give the option by chihowa · · Score: 1

      It says, "delete", but it's functionally a backspace key in that it strikes back instead of forward. It even emits the same code when pressed as a PC backspace key.

      And it's right in line with what the parent said: "It's the Applesque "We know whats best" design methodology. And it sucks."

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    70. Re:Give the option by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Talk about semantics, lol.

      Apple staunchly block access and configuration to ALL kinds of things, it's "Apples way or the highway" with a SHITLOAD of their devices and software. It's why Android boomed at the start.

      To try and defend them of this, on the semantics of one thing is laughable. You're fighting a battle which was lost years ago.

      Who was talking about Android?

      Apple doesn't often actually "Block Access" to stuff in OS X. They don't provide a nice GUI way to configure for a lot of things; but if you're willing to edit a .plist file, you can usually "get there".

      But, we're talking about OS X, not iOS, and especially not talking about Android. YOU brought THAT into the conversation as a strawman.

      Now, if you care to back-up your bald assertions of "block[ing] access and configuration to all kinds of things" vis-a-vis OS X, give me some examples. Otherwise, STFU.

    71. Re: Give the option by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Android boomed because it could do what iPhone couldn't. Like copy&paste.

      Boy, you really had to dig-deep for THAT one!

      Let's see: How long was it before iOS included Copy & Paste?

      Well, the first iPhone was actually Released for sale in June or July, 2007. iPhoneOS 3.0 (it wasn't even called iOS yet!) introduced Copy/Cut/Paste/Undo/Redo in March, 2009. So, essentially, there isn't an iPhone "alive" today that doesn't do Copy & Paste. Not for a long, long time.

      Now, let's talk about something a little more important, like Android and its Permissions Model, vs. iOS'...

    72. Re:Give the option by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I have noticed that FF on my Ubuntu machine doesn't seem to support Backspace. All the Windows browsers I've tried do.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    73. Re: Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a made up excuse that lazy or deluded developers toss out because they don't want to design a correctly configurable, working interface.

    74. Re: Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Applesque methodology sucked too at first, until I learned why they chose this route:

      1. Through user testing and behavior research, Apple realized most people don't change defaults. So the default decisions are key, giving users the option to configure it differently is a waste. (Remember, most users are not like YOU the programmer/power user.)

      2. Through user testing and behavior research, Apple realized most people are so overwhelmed by having TOO MANY options in software that their minds suffer from "feature headaches" and they choose some other, simpler, software instead.

      Nowadays I design software at my company the same way, and users have never been happier.

      captcha: psyche

    75. Re: Give the option by Rato+Ruter · · Score: 1

      In fact they are changing a default behavior from the beginning of the browser history. It made a lot of sense when the internet was almost exclusively a content source. Nowadays, with more and more content is being created with a web interface and as the post sugests, this behavior could be catastrophic. I like Emacs' way. When you press Ctrl+Left, it asks you what do you want with that combo. In my case, I want to jump to the next white space, but in some version of Emacs it was the shortcut to scroll the whole screen, allowing you to view beyond the (maybe) 80 column limit. Not really sure what. This way I can choose the behavior and save it. Or not, in which case I'm asked every time I use the combo.

    76. Re:Give the option by doccus · · Score: 1

      I wholeheartedly agree. That's what the Function / arrows should be for, or at the very least Function / backspace. It's called.. er.. back"space", after all ;-)
      Now if only Chrome could solve it's losing all the passwords forcing me to look them all up again every three months...Some of the most annoying behaviors it's displayed have taken years to address, after all..

    77. Re:Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! I remember these! Were'nt they first properly implemented on NeXT or something? Wait, I think it was BeOS.. actually.. And then completely forgotten by the time OSX was developed? I seem to recall, now, that the only place I ever really even saw them properly implemented, was on QNX. Linux GUIs were too inconsisten to have them all.. Windows 95 had them, mostly.. Slowly, all these guidelines are being dis-implemented.. Which is ridiculous, really.. Apple really led the pack with hard and fast rules regarding human interface design.. simply because they did the most research into it...
      This is something that should be re-examined. It's for darmn sure that M$ has not visited the old rule book in quite some time. Nor has Apple, lately. Both have become cumbersome to use.. a sure sign of poor gui design. IMHO, anyways...

    78. Re: Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be the best, if there is a settings option it will keep everybody happy. If they go all draconian, only a small percentage will appreciate it. The choice is clear...

    79. Re:Give the option by Chalnoth · · Score: 1

      It's not so much that options are evil, but options do significantly complicate testing, making production bugs more likely.

      Every option that can be chosen separately is a different configuration of the software that must be tested to ensure it's working properly. So if you have, for example, 10 binary options, that's 1024 different browser configurations to test. If you have 20, then you're at more than a million options, which is just impossible to test thoroughly.

      It's definitely possible to reduce all of this difficulty through compartmentalization and good coding and testing practices, but more options will always result in more opportunity for user-facing bugs to happen to end-users. The benefit, of course, is that the kinds of bugs that are a result of various options can typically be worked-around by selecting different options. But it's still a significant increase in testing cost, and one major worry is that users will simply move on to a different piece of software rather than search around for a way to work around the issue.

    80. Re:Give the option by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      Your username is "Macs for all" for fucks sake, and *I* was talking about iOS, you know, an Apple product.

      MACS.4.ALL

      Go away you dozy bastard

    81. Re:Give the option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xerox PARC is Xerox Palo Alto Research Centre, not the OS or GUI. Also [citation needed].

      Even if they had the first implementation, Google popularised it just like Microsoft popularised the GUI.

    82. Re:Give the option by macs4all · · Score: 0

      Your username is "Macs for all" for fucks sake, and *I* was talking about iOS, you know, an Apple product.

      MACS.4.ALL

      Go away you dozy bastard

      As usual with these ad Hominem attacks based on my username, you spend so much vitriol on that, you never get around to addressing the SUBSTANCE of my question.

      And WTF does "dozy" mean, anyway?

    83. Re:Give the option by Trogre · · Score: 1

      What Firefox build supports it? Because none that I have seen do.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    84. Re:Give the option by psmears · · Score: 1

      What Firefox build supports it? Because none that I have seen do.

      You've never had to use Windows? You lucky soul :-)

      In fact the Linux builds support it too - it's disabled by default, but if you set the "browser.backspace_action" option to 0 (which is the default for Windows installs) it will enable it, if you really want to ;-)

  3. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That annoying behavior cost me some time too!

  4. Re: The Republicans really do rule Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are so stupid.

  5. Re: The Republicans really do rule Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have destroyed a good company.

  6. Really? This was a design decision, not a bug? by dan_linder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For all the pain this has called me, I'm glad our national nightmare is finally over!

  7. Why not just fix it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And if there is a form element with text in it that did not exist on page load, show an alert window on backspace outside of that textarea or input element and ask if the user is sure they want to go back a page because there is an element with user inputted text.

    Seems pretty simple, they must be on something.

    1. Re:Why not just fix it right by dohzer · · Score: 1

      A window to ask if you really want to leave the page... nope, can't see any websites exploiting that.

    2. Re:Why not just fix it right by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

      If by 'exploit' you mean forcing a whopping 1 more click or button tap to navigate away, then sure. In any reasonably modern browser the unload event is 'special' and the web page code is only able to initiate the prompt but cannot handle or subvert the user's choice in any way. You will also notice that in this prompt 'confirm' is always the focused choice so all you have to do is tap enter or space. Easy-peasy. I personally like backspace as a navigation hotkey and am not a fan of keyboards studded with metafunction keys I never use, so this is my preferred approach to trap the accidental 'back'.

    3. Re:Why not just fix it right by dohzer · · Score: 1

      Not a big free porn user, I take it?
      I can't believe how long it took Chrome to introduce a button to stop "do you really want to leave..." windows popping up indefinitely. Now you just have to click the "stop this window appearing again" box on the second asking.

    4. Re:Why not just fix it right by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

      Oh plenty, but what you are talking about is alert() loops. Those take place before the unload event, and they are their own pain in the ass. I like how they stretch the dialog off the screen though so you can't get at the 'stop this...' checkbox.

  8. Mouse "back" button too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't count the number of times I've accidentally nudged the "back" button on my 5 button mice at or near the end of a

    1. Re:Mouse "back" button too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an OS option, so you can simply turn that behavior off system-wide. The button itself is treated as a joystick or mouse button with an offset number (Joy2, Mouse5, whatever). Your OS is what binds that input to the back-navigation function as a system-wide meta-command. Fix it your own damned self.

      Meanwhile, this age-old bad design decision to handle the backspace keypress event by invoking back-navigation is long overdue for removal. Someone had to break with tradition, and make it right.

    2. Re:Mouse "back" button too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Fix it your own damned self" Whoa... take some Ritalin or smoke a doobie! I was just sharing my pov of how easy it is to hit the back nav button. Nothing to fix.

    3. Re:Mouse "back" button too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, I admit to not reading the full(?) comment before I replied, and therefore, "whoosh" applies. I would've probably gotten it if it was a full-on "NO CARRIER" joke, but I derped.

      Second, the comment you singled out was meant to be in the spirit of RTFM-as-a-joke, but I agree it didn't translate well.

      Third, I refuse to use substances to alter my mood. If I can't do it myself, it's not happening. Any day now.

      And fourth, I agree with your basic premise.

  9. I always install this add-on immediately. by shellster_dude · · Score: 1

    Backstop, nuff said: https://chrome.google.com/webs...

  10. good. by jason777 · · Score: 1

    good? i guess.

  11. Re: The Republicans really do rule Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once saw a republican not be able to figure out what "pg dn" meant on a keyboard. Google must have hired a bunch of people that stupid.

  12. Re: The Republicans really do rule Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My little brother works at Google. He says he vomits almost daily from all of the Trump shit spewed all over the office.

  13. Long overdue by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It took this many years until one browser vendor has noticed this usability problem? I have lost uncountable forms to this stupid feature. It works especially best when you are in a hurry or tired.

    Make it an option (buried in the config) for those who want it, and turn it off by default.

    --
    17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
    1. Re:Long overdue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recognize that it is a problem but is their workaround the best way to address this issue?
      Can they instead keep full state of the page you were in and make forward button work such that all form data is not lost?

      If you accidentally press back button you can just press forward button to get back to where you were.

    2. Re:Long overdue by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

      Then it becomes a nuisance for read-only pages where fast key navigation is very useful. It is not the browser's fault when you lose a form due to a misplaced backspace, it is the form developer's fault for not building a navigation confirmation into their page (and also a little bit your fault for losing your cursor). If the higher level system cannot make a decision that works for all cases, then that decision should not be made by that system.

    3. Re: Long overdue by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 2

      Can they instead keep full state of the page you were in and make forward button work such that all form data is not lost?

      If you accidentally press back button you can just press forward button to get back to where you were.

      In my limited understanding, this behavior is controlled by the website, not browser. This is done on purpose and is part of web standards (standard practices, at least). Sites can specify to preserve the form content through page back/forward, or they can specify to delete it after the page is left. Many sites use both options on purpose. The default in website software is usually to delete, as this is best for secirity (login screens, submission of cc and other personal data... most typed-in things are best gone after the page is left, just to be sure in case another user is using the same computer). Removing or modifying this browser behavior would break things in a major way.

      --
      17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
    4. Re:Long overdue by PaulRivers10 · · Score: 1

      I seriously can't believe it's taken years to figure out either, though I'd be very happy to see the change happen and get rid of the backspace key going back. It doesn't remove a shortcut - you just have to use a different shortcut to go back, one that you wouldn't press by accident.

    5. Re:Long overdue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely long overdue, but the issue for me is, why is there no forward button to go back to where I just was with all data intact?... Is it too hard to just snapshot the current page in memory when the back button is pressed, then present a fresh back page whilst still preserving the old tab for the possibility of forward reuse?

      edit- ok my ignorance has shown me another browser I do not use has had this feature for a while.

    6. Re:Long overdue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fast page navigation?
      It's called the fucking Navigation section of the keyboard.
      It is far superior for navigating webpages.

      Backspace and Spacebar to navigate webpages?
      Give me a time machine to go back and punch whoever came up with that atrocious idea right in his or her dick.
      The worst features in web browsers. Worse than pop-ups, worse than unsecure JS, worse than ActiveX. All of these could be disabled, whitelisted or blocked. But these couldn't.
      At least, not until Userscripts became useful at intercepting the pages event handlers. Easy to ban spacebar and backspace outside of form elements.

    7. Re:Long overdue by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Have to agree with this. I doubt that their is a person in the entire world, who has used the internet for any length of time and not been inconvenienced by this default browser behaviour. Also, no one in their right mind would use this feature anyways, as it does not work when focused in on any editable text box including the URL bar. It is just the most ridiculous design you could think of.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    8. Re:Long overdue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why you use a text editor to compose lengthy texts for form textareas. Then paste it into the form just before submitting. I've learned this the hard way. Web browsers just cannot be trusted with any significant amount of text in a form.

    9. Re:Long overdue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. I have hated Microsoft for years on this one. I somewhat understand why they did it - it has "Back" written in it, it has a left arrow on it, but how it ever got through usability testing I just don't understand. Surely Alt-LeftArrow would have made as much or more sense, and would have been less likely to cause mistakes?

    10. Re:Long overdue by B4RSK · · Score: 1

      What usability problem? I have literally never lost a form by pressing the backspace key, and I use backspace to go back pages all the time. Is this really something people struggle with?

      --
      Some people are like slinkies--basically useless but they bring a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs.
    11. Re: Long overdue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BS. Backspace is a text-editing feature, not a browser-specific navigational shortcut. Find another key-combination and wise up instead of serving BS.

    12. Re:Long overdue by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points today to mod parent up. Backspace, a text entry key, should have an option buried in the Accessibility menu for the few retards on this planet that need to use it for navigation instead and be restricted to being a text removal key as it was originally intended.

      --
      -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
  14. 2016 is the year of Lynx on the desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People regularly press the button thinking that they're deleting a word from a form, developers said, but then find that they weren't actually typing into that form and so accidentally go back, losing everything they've done.

    Just save the contents and put them back if the user presses forward. I thought only Firefox devs were a waste of oxygen, but it seems they were merely copying Chrome devs.

    1. Re:2016 is the year of Lynx on the desktop by markus · · Score: 1

      Just save the contents and put them back if the user presses forward. I thought only Firefox devs were a waste of oxygen, but it seems they were merely copying Chrome devs.

      There are two problems with this.

      1. 1) The Chrome team has actually studied how many people use backspace to navigate; and it's a really small number of users. So, for the vast majority of users, the old behavior is 100% unexpected, and requiring navigation "forward" is at best irritating, at worst something that they don't know how to do (e.g. my parents don't even realize there is a "forward" action). Why make something needlessly surprising, confusing, and frustrating for the majority of your users, when you can fix it by disabling navigation on backspace?
      2. 2) Saving the entire state of a web page is suprisingly challenging these days. Web pages literally have hundreds of mega bytes of state, they have worker threads that need to be snapshot'd, and they change server-side state, when navigation happens. For basic web sites, saving state might be possible. For modern complex web sites it just isn't technically feasible -- even if unlimited amounts of memory were available. This gets even worse, if you want to deal with a sequence of multiple backspace keys.

      Ultimately, there are several other keyboard shortcuts for backwards navigation. It's not ideal that a small number of users will have to learn that instead of backspace they now have to press ALT-LEFT, but they'll learn. Just as they learned that CTRL-Q doesn't work, but SHIFT-CTRL-Q does. I bet, after a week, most people won't even notice any more.

    2. Re:2016 is the year of Lynx on the desktop by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

      Right, so then they can deal with the cries of horror as people discover that Chrome is saving what they enter in forms? That is not the browser's job, it is the page's (and server-side session's) job. It's easy to recognize people who have never built a UI before - whatever they personally want is so obviously the right thing to do and those developers just such idiots for not doing exactly what you want all the time.

    3. Re:2016 is the year of Lynx on the desktop by mcswell · · Score: 1

      How do they study this? The key does not get sent to the website, rather it's interpreted by the browser. Does Chrome do key logging?

    4. Re:2016 is the year of Lynx on the desktop by tepples · · Score: 1

      How does the page save the state if the user or the user's network is blocking non-free script as a security measure to stop the spread of ransomware?

    5. Re: 2016 is the year of Lynx on the desktop by NuShrike · · Score: 1

      They obviously forgot to study the entire class such as pull-to-refresh.

    6. Re:2016 is the year of Lynx on the desktop by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

      HTML5 local storage? I'm not sure what 'non-free' script means, but I'm pretty sure it does not preclude all use of HTML5 features, particularly this one designed for this exact purpose.

  15. Re: The Republicans really do rule Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And their support for Trump proves that.

  16. Re:Really? This was a design decision, not a bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Firefox will ask you whether you want to leave a page before going back if there's data entered on the page. Chrome should implement something similar.

  17. UX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People are far less scared of having *Gasp* options to change this sort of thing than UX shitters would ever admit.

    1. Re:UX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I wasn't also an anonymous coward, I'd upvote this.

  18. Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by THE_WELL_HUNG_OYSTER · · Score: 0

    Why not just delete the delete button from the keyboard? Many other 'meta-keys' have disappeared in order to dumb-down the keyboard. Keyboards used to have both backspace and delete, which did two slightly different things. Now my Macbook pro only has a delete button that acts like backspace (not delete), no home/end keys, and all sorts of other missing keys. So, just fucking delete the delete button too. Just like the 'Forward' and 'Refresh' buttons in Firefox. Dumb everything down for the people who do nothing but watch videos on their computers. And before you say, 'Those keys were removed to keep the keyboards small for smaller laptops'... ever hear of modifier keys like fcn, control, alt?

    1. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 4, Informative

      This one actually seems like a good design decision.

      On pc the backspace and delete buttons both exist and they work exactly as they should. Darned if I care what apple does.

      On chrome I also see back, forward and refresh/stop just fine.

      However the problem with backspace going back is that if you are typing in a textarea and you hit backspace it deletes your text (which is what you want). However if you tab to another control that is not text editable and you hit backspace you have now gone back a page and lost what you where entering. It violates all kinds of UI principles.

      Backspace to go back is just a bad UI and fixing it should definitely be done. There is no dumbing down involved.

      --
      Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
    2. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by friesofdoom · · Score: 1

      LMAO, I really hope this is satire! XD

    3. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by Anpatt7 · · Score: 1

      My laptop has at almost all of the keys. Your problem is just that you got a Macbook

      --
      If we start ignoring all of our constitutional rights because of terrorism, then what are we fighting for at that point?
    4. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In general, I still see both buttons on Windows laptops.. Also, my Macbook, at least, DOES have a fn key, and when I press fn+delete, it functions like a delete button, not like backspace. So yes, maybe they did remove the key to create a smaller keyboard to fit the laptop, but in many cases, they managed to keep the functionality of those excised keys, in exactly the manner you suggest. Even if that functionality is not immediately obvious and you might have to RTFM--or at the very least, do a little futzing around--to figure out it's there.

    5. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This isn't a dumb user issue, rather it's a usability issue. I'd say that I am a pretty advanced user, but even I end up accidentally hitting backspace without focus on the right textbox, thus losing everything that I typed.

      Backspace has always been a dumb key to use as "Back" beyond its name.

    6. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by Ichijo · · Score: 2

      if you tab to another control

      Speaking of which, I never cared for the way the tab key is overloaded and prevents you from typing an actual tab into the text field. Same with the Enter key that sometimes submits the form (or goes to the next line in Excel) so you have to use Ctrl-Enter to enter an actual enter. We need new buttons for Next/Previous Field, and Submit.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    7. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one but Emacs uses ^A and ^E to jump to the beginning and end of a line and ^K to delete a line. That's okay, I'll just use what they use. Except what's typical is home and end to jump to the beginning and end of a line, which are at the far corner of the keyboard, and most programs don't even have a delete line from cursor forward button.

      Also no one ever uses caps lock, it should be control, except that control is rarely used because there's no standards so it's only used rarely so it doesn't matter that it's down on the edge.

    8. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by lgw · · Score: 1

      The physical tab key has meant "move the output location to the next field" for a hundred years or so. The idea of a "literal tab character" was always goofy - an ASCII legacy like form-feed, bell, ENQ etc. I don't want to tab key to type an actual 0x09 character any more than I want the PageDown key to type an actual 0x0C character, or the backspace key to type an actual 0x08 character.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    9. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by mrbester · · Score: 1

      I'm laying the blame at Microsoft's door. They also decided that the Enter key should submit a form as apparently tabbing to the submit button and *then* pressing Enter was really hard for the retards in the focus group. This causes even more issues than backspace as it is easy to have a partially completed form submitting when you didn't expect it to because (again) you weren't in a form input. Then the site grumbles at you for not filling in all the required fields...

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    10. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

      Keep your barren hellscape of a keyboard away from my development work. Backspace and Delete are not the same thing. Home and End are indispensable. Modifiers don't help, because Ctrl+Home and Ctrl+End are also indispensable, as are Ctrl+Shit+Home and Ctrl+Shit+End. Every time I have to pick the mouse up precious sub-threads of my train of thought are at risk. I would happily give up my Insert key, but I'm sure there is somebody who is editing hex in a monospace text editor who would sooner gut you than give theirs up.

    11. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by sexconker · · Score: 1

      This is not a problem and it does not violate any "UI principles".

      When you are editing text, backspace edits text.
      When you are not editing text, backspace takes you back.

      Are you going to claim that hitting U a time or two to get to "United States" on a drop down is violating "UI principles" because it behaves differently from hitting U in a text field?

    12. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I'm laying the blame at Microsoft's door. They also decided that the Enter key should submit a form as apparently tabbing to the submit button and *then* pressing Enter was really hard for the retards in the focus group. This causes even more issues than backspace as it is easy to have a partially completed form submitting when you didn't expect it to because (again) you weren't in a form input. Then the site grumbles at you for not filling in all the required fields...

      Why in the hell would you hit Enter when you're not in a text field? Do you just randomly paw at the keys?

    13. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by sexconker · · Score: 1

      CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL
      Control got me out of this jam. Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

    14. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by Moridineas · · Score: 2

      Why not just delete the delete button from the keyboard? Many other 'meta-keys' have disappeared in order to dumb-down the keyboard. Keyboards used to have both backspace and delete, which did two slightly different things. Now my Macbook pro only has a delete button that acts like backspace (not delete), no home/end keys, and all sorts of other missing keys. So, just fucking delete the delete button too. Just like the 'Forward' and 'Refresh' buttons in Firefox. Dumb everything down for the people who do nothing but watch videos on their computers. And before you say, 'Those keys were removed to keep the keyboards small for smaller laptops'... ever hear of modifier keys like fcn, control, alt?

      I'm not entirely sure I'm reading your message correctly, but on an Apple keyboard:
      Fn+Up = Page Up
      Fn+Down = Page Down
      Fn+Backspace (labeled as "delete") = Del
      Fn+Left arrow = Home
      Fn+Right arrow = End
      Fn+Enter = Return (is it vice versa??)
      Fn+Esc = Break

      And just some other useful:
      Option+Up = cursor to beginning of line, or if at beginning of line, up one line
      Option+Down = cursor to end of line, or if at end of line, down one line
      Option+Left arrow = move cursor left one word
      Option+Right arrow = move cursor right one word

      If you're new to Mac OS, shortcut keys and modifier keys are really big. Try dragging with various modifier keys, clicking on the desktop with various modifier keys (e.g. Option+Click on desktop hides the current active program windows, same as Cmd+H), check out Application and system menus while holding down Option, etc.

    15. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      The physical tab key has meant "move the output location to the next field" for a hundred years or so. The idea of a "literal tab character" was always goofy - an ASCII legacy like form-feed, bell, ENQ etc. I don't want to tab key to type an actual 0x09 character any more than I want the PageDown key to type an actual 0x0C character, or the backspace key to type an actual 0x08 character.

      I'm not sure that's quite right.

      The origin of tab keys is from typewriters where there were physical gears that controlled where the carriage stopped. When you pressed tab, the carriage would be moved to the next tab stop (wherever you set that). Tab is short for "tabulate" because this functionality was primarily useful for tabular data--columns of numbers, etc.

      So, similar in concept to "next field" but different too.

      Me, I like tabs.

    16. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If you are in a text box, the application may take "Enter" as a carriage return or Submit, and you won't know until you try it.

      As for why, when I flip to another application, then come back, I'll focus on where I was, not whether I have clicked in the correct text box again. Especially when copy-pasting lots, you'll end up changing application quite frequently, and you may not be in a text field when you think you are.

    17. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      typing "u" in a pull down or text box is a zero-loss event. If you type "USA" at a country pull down and end up selecting antigua, it is trivial to try again. If you hit backspace and go back a page, you have lost data. That's not a trivial error on the part of the program.

    18. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was a perfectly good design before the browser became the OS.

    19. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by lgw · · Score: 1

      You'll notice I said "next output location", not "next field". The two can be the same for tables. But for the past 50 years, sure, it's been more about "next field", as you could send "forms" to high-end printers, then send the form data for each page using tabs to move from location to location (ever wonder why ASCII has both horizontal and vertical tabs?). The whole 0x08-0x0C range were commands to position the print head.

      Tab should never have been a display character, but someone once got "clever" with implied tab locations on screens, and the rest is legacy.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    20. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      You'll notice I said "next output location", not "next field".

      Pedantically, you said:

      The physical tab key has meant "move the output location to the next field" for a hundred years or so.

      But that's ok, I get where you're coming from. Also, some interesting info on Wikipedia.

    21. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 1

      You are entirely right that the Enter key also changes behavior on a page based on context and that is also a very bad design.

      It frustrates me to see people defending bad UI design as somehow better and fixing it as dumbing down. You certainly can dumb down interfaces but this case has nothing to do with that. This is just taking a button that does two different things transparently and destructively and changing that so it does not do the destructive behavior. Enter is the same way and should also be fixed.

      --
      Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
    22. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Not when every select element has javascript bound to it that changes other shit on the page.
      Get real. You can't logically fight against backspace doing different things in different contexts without also fighting against just about every other damned key on the keyboard.

    23. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by sexconker · · Score: 1

      For any given application it's consistent, including your web browser. Learn to use your tools.

      Some shitty sites may behave differently by hijacking your keypresses, but that's just another reason to disable javascript trash by default. Same goes for shitty sites that hijack the context menu (right click).

      You're literally complaining about trying to input data after switching contexts without checking to see what context you've switched to.

    24. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No OS/WM in existence are doing window / dialog focus "right". Maybe no OS/WM ever will.. There are numerous instances where the computer is at a totally different context than the user thinks. UI is about designing around faults in the users, by making the computer responsible / responsive. It's a hard problem though, and you risk dumbing down the interface too much on one end of the scale, versus making simple actions too complex on the other.

      So when keys can have very different actions, it should be very clear to the user what the current context is, or there should only be one action per key combination.

      Anyways, this breaks the principle of minimizing surprises, which is a higher principle than UI/UX standards.

      This is an obvious low hanging fruit that can make many people, both novices and power users alike, more productive by preventing the computer sabotaging their work. Personally, I've never ever used the backspace-key to go back a page. If people have that need, they should find another key for it.

      Yes, the computer should accept people pawing at the keys. People have various disabilities (see: UX).

    25. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why doesn't a browser that wastes gigabytes of RAM store the state of the page when going forward or backwards?
      Unless it's one of those pages that expire it shouldn't be an issue.

    26. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by gnupun · · Score: 1

      I'm laying the blame at Microsoft's door. They also decided that the Enter key should submit a form as apparently tabbing to the submit button and *then* pressing Enter was really hard for the retards in the focus group.

      But thanks to this feature, I don't have to press any webpage buttons when I search using google or bing. I just type the search expression in the textbox and hit the Enter key -- quick and efficient.

    27. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you going to claim that hitting U a time or two to get to "United States" on a drop down is violating "UI principles" because it behaves differently from hitting U in a text field?

      Both cases have the same effect of entering the character "U" into the field. If hitting U when not in a form field uninstalled the program, then that would be a problem.

    28. Re:Delete the fucking delete button. Apple would. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is it about cruise control that makes people forget they still have to steer?

  19. hmmm by devoid42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would have gotten first post but I hit the backspace

    --

    I am a figment of my own imagination.

  20. Argle bargle Republicans harrumph! by JMZero · · Score: 1

    Yes, those Republicans and their constant drive to change things and break with tradition. Oh wait that's exactly the opposite of a typical Republican perspective. If you Americans have to crap on every discussion with this boring local politics, at least get your stupid stereotypes the right way (pun!).

    Anyway, I have never purposefully hit backspace intending to page back (I use gestures or click the back button). I have accidentally lost stuff by hitting backspace (especially in "pseudo-textbox" type fancy input controls where the focus is not always clear). I'm sure there's people who won't like it, but I think it's a good change for most users.

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
    1. Re: Argle bargle Republicans harrumph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, tradition. The virtue of doing things the way you do things because you do things the way you do things.

    2. Re:Argle bargle Republicans harrumph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is also easy enough to find another shortcut.

    3. Re: Argle bargle Republicans harrumph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about having two versions of Google Chrome: one for folks who know their way around the browser and are tech savvy and another one for the rest. This way it is not restricting one user and still keep another user safe. No one needs to lose on this.

  21. Why not fix the actual problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Why not fix the actual problem of the forward button not returning them to the page with all of their work in tact?

    ...and while they're at it, they can make the browser display a file upload progress indicator, just like it displays a file download progress indicator, so that every web site in the world doesn't have to hack together some javascript bullshit just so that users realize something is actually happening when they click "upload."

    Fucking idiot web browser developers. Can't think outside of the box about anything. It's always been a certain way, and so that's how it's supposed to be in their minds.

    1. Re:Why not fix the actual problem? by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

      Fucking idiot web browser developers

      So you'll just let us know when you have solved this incredibly easy problem, then? It seems you know quite a bit about HTTP, HTML/5, JS, CSS, browsers and UI design. More than me obviously, because I cannot imagine just how the fuck you would store every form value, JS variable, DHTML element state, dynamically loaded resource and HTML5 local store content perfectly back to their original states. What do I know though, I'm just an idiot developer.

    2. Re:Why not fix the actual problem? by narcc · · Score: 1

      I cannot imagine just how the fuck you would store every form value, JS variable, DHTML element state, dynamically loaded resource and HTML5 local store content perfectly back to their original states.

      Why would you need to do that? Going back could simply hide the current page for some brief period before closing it. Go forward within that period and just make it visible again.

      Or, you know, prevent the problem in the first place by not mapping the backspace key to the back function. (In FireFox: set browser.backspace_action = 2)

      When you're faced with a ridiculously complicated solution, look around a bit, there's usually a much simpler one.

    3. Re:Why not fix the actual problem? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Fucking idiot web browser developers

      So you'll just let us know when you have solved this incredibly easy problem, then? It seems you know quite a bit about HTTP, HTML/5, JS, CSS, browsers and UI design. More than me obviously, because I cannot imagine just how the fuck you would store every form value, JS variable, DHTML element state, dynamically loaded resource and HTML5 local store content perfectly back to their original states. What do I know though, I'm just an idiot developer.

      Well, the tab has a state. Before navigation, store that state. Upon returning to that page in the history, restore that state. Chrome certainly has enough RAM to do this. A single GMail tab gives me 8 chrome.exe processes (32-bit, of course) and eats up half a gig of memory. In many cases, FF, PaleMoon, and IE DO restore form fields when navigating back and forth.

    4. Re:Why not fix the actual problem? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Opera solved it 10 years ago. That you are dumb doesn't mean anyone else is. Back takes you back. Forward again from there re-fills the fields previously filled in.

    5. Re:Why not fix the actual problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a solution. My work shouldn't disappear from sight just because the browser decided BACKSPACE suddenly means "Backwards" in the browser.

      You and I may know the soltion, but 90% of people will be lost and obviously, browser developers/standards people are blind to the obvious simple solution (20 years and counting).

    6. Re:Why not fix the actual problem? by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1
      Oh goody it fills in form fields. And when those fields do not exist when I go forward because they were created dynamically based on initial actions and/or context, which executed a bunch of JS / sent a bunch of AJAX requests to get the content for the rest of the page? Or, when the field elements have generated IDs? Or worse, when they don't, and the browser keeps thinking it remembers the field when it is an entirely different one?

      Opera solved it 10 years ago

      For the websites of 10 years ago. Bully for them. You may have noticed that websites look and act a little differently in today's age of hyperactive UX designers.

    7. Re: Why not fix the actual problem? by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

      Sounds elegant, but problematic if you think about it. Is the JS engine thread for that page suspended? If not, you now have an active page that you cannot see or close (what if you navigated away to stop whatever the page was doing?). If it is suspended, then what about timer loops, active Ajax calls, time-sensitive cookies /session content on which the page depends? There is a high chance in today's fancypants websites that the resumption of that page will not go as planned.

    8. Re: Why not fix the actual problem? by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

      A tab is not just state. In modern pages, it is likely to be buzzing with JS calls and active AJAX requests. Not only are these things difficult to store as 'state', one of them is impossible because the other end of it is on the remote server. Web pages these days are very rarely WYSIWYG, they are generally built dynamically and rely on a bunch of non-static, non-serializable things to behave as intended. Anybody can store the current rendered markup, or even the memory state of the JS thread, but this still does not mean it will come back as intended

    9. Re:Why not fix the actual problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The web is stateless but ok.

    10. Re: Why not fix the actual problem? by narcc · · Score: 1

      Browsers already throttle JS on inactive tabs, and have done so for years. If there's a problem there, it exists already in a far more common context. How many sites break when you switch tabs?

      As for an active page you can't close causing problems, as we're only keeping it alive for a brief period (I'd say about a minute) to allow a quick 'forward' to save you from an accidental 'back', it wouldn't be a problem for very long. As the problem here is accidental back navigation, and the backspace key is very rarely used to move back, a more satisfying solution to this is to only save the page if the backspace key is used to navigate back. As it's only a problem if the user has entered information in to a form, you could also only save the page this way if form data has been entered.

      Though that brings up another alternative. One that doesn't change a standard navigation key, which is a problem for some users. (Think 'accessibility' here. Not everyone can use a mouse, see, or even easily press two keys simultaneously.) That is, prompt to confirm back navigation if data has been entered in to a form field.

      Though I wonder if completely suspending the page would cause many problems at all. I've often put my computer to sleep, traveled to a different location, and resumed without issue, regardless of how fancy the sites pants might have been. (A site that breaks on a failed ajax call would be one awful site!) I could be the exception, but it would be worth investigation if you were tasked with implementing such a thing. I guess all this digression supports my point, as we're getting lost in more complicated solutions when there are far simpler ones that don't share those issues just a few steps away.

      Again, the entire point was that there's usually a simpler solution to problems like this when you're faced with an absurdly complex one. You just have to look a little closer. We did look closer, and now we have three possibly solutions to the problem, all much simpler than the above proposed Rube Goldberg page restore approach. I like the 'prompt if form data entered' one a bit more than the simplest (unmapping 'back' function from the backspace key) as it would also save us from the nightmare that is the accidental activation of the back gesture.

    11. Re: Why not fix the actual problem? by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1
      tl;dr Look at the bottom. We are actually agreeing with each other.

      As for an active page you can't close causing problems, as we're only keeping it alive for a brief period (I'd say about a minute) to allow a quick 'forward' to save you from an accidental 'back', it wouldn't be a problem for very long.

      'Very long' in this context is highly subjective.

      As the problem here is accidental back navigation, and the backspace key is very rarely used to move back, a more satisfying solution to this is to only save the page if the backspace key is used to navigate back.

      I actually think this is an interesting problem independent of backspace, so removing it doesn to make the issue moot. Accidental navigation can still happen many other ways (my cat is very skilled at hitting the nav buttons on my mouse).

      As it's only a problem if the user has entered information in to a form, you could also only save the page this way if form data has been entered.

      Not quite. Many pages that have had overeager UX inflicted upon them have 'stages' of data entry where the form controls for an initial entry are gone now, and you cannot properly detect/restore the overall state of data entry by simply monitoring.form fields.

      That is, prompt to confirm back navigation if data has been entered in to a form field.

      Now we are in agreement. This is what I do in my web UIs. If you scroll up a ways through this post, you will see that this all started because that was my simpler solution and I was objecting to somebody calling browser developers idiots for not undertaking the Rube Goldberg contraption approach when such a simple solution was available. Now we are just having some fun tinkering with the Rube Goldberg idea, but I think it is silly to expect this to be a built-in browser feature that works flawlessly when there is such a simpler bottom-up approach exists.

    12. Re:Why not fix the actual problem? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Funny, cars have come a long way in 50 years, but turn signals still work. Nope, your excuses seem lame and quite silly.

    13. Re:Why not fix the actual problem? by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1
      Attending the Sarah Palin school of rhetoric I see?

      Funny, cars have come a long way in 50 years, but turn signals still work

      Let's test that logic in a far more appropriate analogy:

      "Funny, web pages have come a long way in 10 years, but 10 year old browsers still work"

      This is what you are actually trying to say. Sounds a bit 'lame and quite silly', no? If you'd care to address the actual meat of the comment (the part where you will need to actually understand how web 2.0+ works), by all means please let me know how Opera manages to populate dynamic form fields that do not yet physically exist. Why don't you give it a try right here on /., where the comment field does not exist until you click 'reply'. Write your comment, click 'back', click 'forward' and then click 'submit' (because your comment is still there, right?)

    14. Re:Why not fix the actual problem? by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

      You know, I've never used Opera so I got curious and just tried it out. Wonder of wonders, it didn't fucking work.

  22. Whoever came up with that feature wasted millions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Millions of human hours likely measured in thousands of human lives

  23. I totally agree 100% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, remove this misfeature. It's bitten me more than once. One stray click you didn't notice removing form input focus and bam!, you lose it all when you think you are still editing.

    At the *very* least, implement a "are you sure you want to leave this page" confirmation. As annoying as that may be, far less worse than unwittingly losing your work.

  24. I support it by nine-times · · Score: 1

    I support this change. I've had multiple instances over the years where I'm filling out a complicated form, try to erase a couple characters by hitting the backspace key, and found myself going to previous pages and wiping out the work that I'd done. Honestly, I don't use the "Back" button enough to need a shortcut.

    Now if only Macs would stop using the two-finger trackpad swipe gesture as a shortcut for back/forward buttons. I know you can turn it off (and I do on any Mac I sit down at), but the two-finger swipe is already used for scrolling, and it's a stupid move to have the same gesture do two different things in the same app.

  25. For the three of you who actually used it by Solandri · · Score: 2

    alt + left arrow or right arrow are equivalent to the back and forward buttons. I know, I know, two buttons at once is sooooo hard, but you'll manage.

    For the remaining billions of us who've lost countless hours of typing due to this stupid "feature", Hooray!

    1. Re:For the three of you who actually used it by Dishwasha · · Score: 1

      And there's still hope for those three people. They can run key mapping software that detects when they're not in a form while on a web page and make backspace trigger alt-left! Just do the opposite of http://stackoverflow.com/quest....

    2. Re:For the three of you who actually used it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not want to be belittled here, loosing content by not looking where the focus is is learning the hard way. Peopel who do not know how to use backspace key shouldn't be using computers in the first place.

    3. Re:For the three of you who actually used it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      alt + left arrow or right arrow are equivalent to the back and forward buttons. I know, I know, two buttons at once is sooooo hard, but you'll manage.

      The problem is not two buttons. There is nothing wrong with ctrl+x, ctrl+c, ctrl+v, and a lot more of combinations where you can use ONE HAND. The problem with alt+arrows is that you need two hands. And when you are just browsing, the most likely setup is one hand on the keyboard, one hand on the mouse.

    4. Re:For the three of you who actually used it by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      That's the one I use for back. I don't usually use the backspace key to go back in the browser history because that does not make sense.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    5. Re:For the three of you who actually used it by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I DO use the backspace key to go back, because I only have to press one key instead of two. I will admit that Alt + Left makes more sense and is more consistent.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    6. Re:For the three of you who actually used it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks! I never knew about that key combo! :D :D :D

  26. Old Opera did things right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If I recall correctly, the Old (Presto) Opera had the correct way to manage this: If a person pressed back and then went Forward, ALL the data of the page forms was there again. It is such a pity, that there are no decent browsers since its collapse!

    1. Re: Old Opera did things right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new Vivaldi browser does this.

      Also preserves form content across restarts.

    2. Re:Old Opera did things right by sexconker · · Score: 1

      The only browser that DOESN'T do this is Chrome. FF, PaleMoon, and IE11 all do it as far as I can tell. Some pages with shitty javascript can fuck it up, but this is a standard fucking feature.

  27. Re: The Republicans really do rule Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's how they is.

  28. WTF by Spacelord · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No! I use that feature all the time. Together with vimium, it allows me to navigate while keeping my hands on the keyboard without having to reach for my mouse all the time.

    I know alt+left arrow works too, but a chorded keyboard shortcut is a lot less convenient, and I'd still have to move my hand to the arrow cluster instead of staying close to home row.

    1. Re:WTF by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

      Right. Why do we have to suffer because some idiots can't manage to make sure their cursor is in a text box?

    2. Re:WTF by Fwipp · · Score: 1

      Dude. Just map it in vimium.

    3. Re:WTF by junkman · · Score: 1

      Would Ctl-Backspace or Alt-Backspace as a default "Back" button be better for those complaining about two-hands for Alt-Left?

    4. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making it a configurable option hurts no one, and you're a bad person.

    5. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ctl-backspace means 'delete the last word'. Alt-backspace means 'Undo'.

      So basically, no.

      Here's a thought: let users map whatever weird functions they like on their own personal browsers, but leave defaults the hell alone.

    6. Re: WTF by CorporalKlinger · · Score: 1

      The use of the backspace button to move "Back" in a browser is a holdover from the days of Netscape Navigator and its atrocious interface. Microsoft adopted it in I.E., and then all subsequent browsers adopted it for compatibility. Firefox has a configuration setting for what Backspace does. Why shouldn't Chrime?
      More than once, I've accidentally "clicked" outside a text area (particularly easy to do on a laptop trackpad) and then hit backspace, thinking I was still in a text entry box, obliterating everything I entered when the browser moved "Back."
      Use Ctrl+Left Arrow or Ctrl+Right Arrow to go Back and Forward. This works in all modern browsers and across all platforms, and is unambiguous. Command left-bracket and Command right-bracket also work in Apple's Safari. I'm sorry you'll have to move your fingers a few more inches to save the rest of us hours of frustration.

    7. Re:WTF by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      I like the backspace key for back as well and I use it all the time... it makes so much sense to me... it's got a back arrow right there.

      Sure, I have been burned by it a couple of times, but that is why I just use the delete key or ctrl+shift+arrows to select text and then the delete key, in forms and never use the backspace button.

      Anyway, as long as it is map-able, I don't have a major issue with the change.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    8. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Why do we have to suffer because some idiots can't manage to make sure their cursor is in a text box?

      Why do we have to suffer losing work because you can't figure out how to use the other keyboard shortcuts for going back?
      To solve your problem all you have to do is use a different keyboard shortcut.

    9. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it allows me to navigate while keeping my hands on the keyboard without having to reach for my mouse all the time.

      Make your own shortcut then, Mr hipster OMG a mouse is too hard to use.

    10. Re:WTF by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      Why do we have to suffer because some idiots can't manage to make sure their cursor is in a text box?

      You're not suffering, you still have a keyboard short cut. Sometimes the computer decides to change focus on you in the middle of typing. It's very annoying when a backspace is involved.

    11. Re:WTF by Spacelord · · Score: 1

      That is an option I guess. Still means remembering yet another non-trivial thing to configure on a new chrome installation. (add-ons don't sync settings)

    12. Re:WTF by sexconker · · Score: 1

      You don't have to suffer because we can't figure something out. You have to suffer because you're a dumbass who is hitting keys before knowing what your context/focus is.

    13. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Firefox on Linux, I use Ctrl+[ and Ctrl+]. (But on Windows they do nothing, annoyingly.)

    14. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and we all have to suffer because you're a dick.

      Good thing nothing ever steals your focus.

    15. Re:WTF by subreality · · Score: 1

      Shift-H is mapped by default in vimium. It's chorded, but at least it keeps you on the home row.

    16. Re:WTF by johannesg · · Score: 1

      ***Vimium***!? Look, if you want to use vi-style keys, just go all the way and use 'X' as your 'go back one page' key. Or switch the browser to 'browsing mode'. Or define a :back command to go back one page. Do whatever dumb shit makes you happy, but leave us out of it.

      I've lost countless emails to shitty webmail deciding I really need focus somewhere unexpected, and returning me to the login page. It's way past time we got rid of this madness.

    17. Re:WTF by Spacelord · · Score: 1

      Do whatever dumb shit makes you happy, but leave us out of it.

      How about they leave me and everyone else out of it and don't go breaking people's workflow by changing around default keyboard shortcuts that have worked for decades.

      I've lost countless emails to shitty webmail deciding I really need focus somewhere unexpected, and returning me to the login page. It's way past time we got rid of this madness.

      I can't remember that ever happening to me.

    18. Re:WTF by Spacelord · · Score: 1

      Sometimes the computer decides to change focus on you in the middle of typing

      That is more a Windows problem than a Chrome problem.

      Even so, if Windows decides to change focus to another window, it would be to something other than your browser window, so how Chrome handles the backspace in that scenario is irrelevant because it doesn't have the focus anymore.

      It's only when you manually change the focus back to Chrome, that you should pay attention that your text box is focused before pressing backspace. If you don't do that, that's just a PEBKAC error in my book.

    19. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vimium has shift-h mapped to go back a page. (Well, at least cVim and Keyboard-fu both do, so I expect Vimium does as well.)

    20. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your brilliant workaround is just to never use backspace for the reason it was created?

    21. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you've been on enough websites if you think your focus can't disappear mid-typing on some less-than-great-sites.

  29. Tainted??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only if you teabag it

    1. Re:Tainted??? by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      I'll assure you, I did teabag it.

    2. Re: Tainted??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys are weird.

  30. Re:Really? This was a design decision, not a bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nope! This is a site-specific feature, implemented in the code of the web page. It's not a feature in Firefox.

    I'm using Firefox right now, and I just double-checked.

  31. Re:Really? This was a design decision, not a bug? by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

    it does on mine

  32. alt-arrow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good thing they're not removing alt-left and alt-right! Those are significantly saner keyboard shortcuts.

  33. This is a problem? by NEOGEOman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is sort of weird. As a long time Opera user I never had a problem accidentally leaving the page. My browser always remembered what I'd typed and going forward again to the form page would have all my content as I'd left it.

    IMO the problem isn't the backspace key, it's unfriendly browsers.

    1. Re:This is a problem? by freeze128 · · Score: 2

      I think the reason that this problem just came to light recently has more to do with Windows 10. Sometimes, Windows 10 will spontaneously perform a screen refresh that cancels any UI text input that is happening at the same time. A friend has also noticed it, and it caused him to delete a file while in the process of renaming it.

      Chrome shouldn't change its behavior to get around this obvious failure.... The problem should be addressed at the CAUSE.

    2. Re:This is a problem? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yeah I remember this. Then I also remember when website for complicated enough that this or filling by the browser when you inside the accidental back caused a lot of problems with various scripts that monitored the input fields. "You must enter your date of birth" IT ALREADY IS. GARRRRRR.

  34. Re:Really? This was a design decision, not a bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There is a Firefox ticket requesting a feature like the parent poster mentioned. It's only been open since the year 2000.
    Since a website can tell the browser to pop a dialog asking the user to confirm before they leave, maybe that explains the low priority.

  35. Don't stop at Backspace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Disable the damn ESC key from doing anything as well. That has bitten me more than the Backspace key...

  36. Don't browsers remember text field content? by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

    I thought today's browser automatically remembered the contents of the text fields if you hit back and then go forward again (using the forward button, not clicking the link again)??

    I mean, IE and FireFox remember the contents of text fields if I hit back (or backspace) and it goes back a page. Hit forward and boom, text I entered is still there.

    Granted, it's not a behaviour that works 100% because of the way some websites work (especially rich text fields), but it seems to work fairly well..

    Doesn't Chrome remember it?

    1. Re:Don't browsers remember text field content? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I believe you are right.

      Though I use RoboForm so I haven't manually filled out a web form in years.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:Don't browsers remember text field content? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      As far as I know every browser other than Chrome remembers it unless there's some especially shitty javascript on the page that fucks it up.
      The fact that this is a problem in Chrome is news to me, but it doesn't surprise me.

    3. Re:Don't browsers remember text field content? by tepples · · Score: 1

      I use RoboForm so I haven't manually filled out a web form in years.

      Did you also compose and submit this comment through RoboForm?

    4. Re:Don't browsers remember text field content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

      Google Chrome is a bad joke.

  37. Chromebook Keyboards by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 2

    With Internet and browsers dominating existence, keyboards should be redesigned with common browser clickies built in and separate from editing keys.

    Apropos of the subject, Chromebooks do exactly that. Who needs those function keys anyway?

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    1. Re:Chromebook Keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYAD! I loathe Lenovo's decision to wreck the historically great Thinkpad Keyboard by, among other things, deciding to replace the Fn keys with a touch keyboard that is constantly mis-triggered due to large fingers brushing them when reaching for the number keys.

  38. They are just trying to save face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far back as the first version of chrome, they've had problems handling backspaces correctly. If you hit backspace in an empty text field (or address bar!), it would register as a back button press. And how many years later, those "geniuses" at google are still trying to cover that up! Learn to test software, geniuses!

  39. Yup, just disabled it in Vivaldi, thanks Chrome by Skulthur · · Score: 1

    Yup, just disabled it in Vivaldi and (old) opera, thanks Chrome for reminding me to turn that awful binding off. There's already much better binding for that (usually mouse gestures for me) but you can configure them like you want in any sane browser.

  40. Chrome Development by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, no, that's not why that's there. The reason 'flags' exists is because chrome doesn't branch. Any features that are in development go right in the main branch, so there's no costly merging. It has basically nothing to do with UI concerns; it's a result of the dev process.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    1. Re:Chrome Development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's a pragmatic middleground that makes UI/UX designers happy, developers happy and then users happy, in that order.

  41. Re:Really? This was a design decision, not a bug? by scdeimos · · Score: 1

    Firefox will ask you whether you want to leave a page before going back if there's data entered on the page.

    I call bullshit. I have lost many FogBugz responses over the years because Firefox inexplicably decided that a Backspace keystroke in a case edit should be interpreted as a 'Previous page' command instead of deleting the previous character. When dealing with longer responses we now tend to write them in Atom, Notepad, etc. and copy-paste the final output into FogBugz so as to avoid the pain.

  42. Relevant bug by thisisauniqueid · · Score: 2
    1. Re:Relevant bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The level of condescension... _

  43. Pulling a Lazarus by macraig · · Score: 1

    Hey, Google, if your real motive here is truly to "save the (form) data", why not buy or license the use of the Lazarus extension's codebase and simply incorporate that into Chrome? Then you could leave our fucking backspace key mapped the way it's always been since 1995. The Lazarus extension for Firefox has been effectively negating that disaster for years now.

  44. SPACEBAR. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kill the fucking Spacebar = down feature as well.
    ABSOLUTE SEETHING RAGE at this feature.

    People using spacebar to browse webpages should be punched in the throat. All three of them.
    No, you are the one at fault for buying a crap laptop with Page Up/Down buttons behind an Fn key. Any decent laptop keyboard has it beside the Up arrow, with Home and End behind the Fn.

    Having to use a Userscript to nullify stupid retarded decisions that have been with us for years annoys me greatly.
    It pissed me off on HERE more than any site because this site has hotkeys out the ass based on single key presses.
    Accidentally clicking outside a Titlebar and typing, having the page shook around like a bad parent shaking a baby to death. Awful awful features.
    At least use Alt-[key], /.

    Also, while you are at it, make Pause pause a webpages JS parser. And ctrl+Pause to step it.
    Might as well add a useful feature in while killing 2 awful features.
    No, not under Inspect Element, global option. Sometimes websites are written very poorly and have JS and event timers spamming the shit out of the parser because their devs don't know a damn thing about what they are doing.

  45. How about the mouse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fancy mice, which you might want for other reasons, sprout buttons all over. If you aren't super careful, you'll hit one of the extra buttons. There is a back button.

    Grrr. At first I didn't even know what was causing the glitches. It felt like I was going insane. I'd reach for the mouse or move the mouse, and suddenly I'd be on a different web page. Due to my web browsing style, with many tabs, it wasn't immediately obvious that I was even going back a page. Sometimes I'd hit a different button and it'd go forward.

  46. Finally by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    I've hated backspace as a navigation option as well as space bar as page down. I have a page down button, I don't need the space bar to do it too. Use case, my toddler is perfectly happy to let me read the internet, so long as she can bang away on the biggest key on the keyboard (the space bar).

  47. Re: The Republicans really do rule Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The one guy I know that works for google is a hardcore right wing. He posts trump shit and I have no idea if serious.

    He's Australian, so I guess he doesn't really have a horse in teh race and it might be entirely posted for humours sake.

    But there's something about this friend of mine that has me questioning if it actually is a joke or not.

  48. Do like firefox by GuB-42 · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is an option for this in Firefox, although it is hidden in about:config
    browser.backspace_action :
    0 : go back one page (the default on Windows)
    1 : scroll up (the default on linux before 2006-12-07)
    2 : do nothing (the default on linux after 2006-12-07)

    I like by backspace binding so on linux I change this. This should be the same for Chrome.

    I don't remember losing form data because of this. The biggest cause of losing data is failed submissions (connection problem, website error, session expired, ...). In case it happens I have Lazarus which saved the day a couple of times. Instead of changing keybindings people are used to, form backup is what Chrome should do, so that you don't lose your data no matter what.

    1. Re:Do like firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks. Didn't know this.

    2. Re:Do like firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never changed this setting, and I don't [intentionally] use the backspace key for going back a page, but Firefox on Gentoo seems to default to backspace doing the previous page function.

      So, something's not quite right somewhere...

    3. Re:Do like firefox by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      There is an option for this in Firefox, although it is hidden in about:config
      browser.backspace_action :
      0 : go back one page (the default on Windows)
      1 : scroll up (the default on linux before 2006-12-07)
      2 : do nothing (the default on linux after 2006-12-07)

      I like by backspace binding so on linux I change this. This should be the same for Chrome.

      I don't remember losing form data because of this. The biggest cause of losing data is failed submissions (connection problem, website error, session expired, ...). In case it happens I have Lazarus which saved the day a couple of times. Instead of changing keybindings people are used to, form backup is what Chrome should do, so that you don't lose your data no matter what.

      I wondered about that. I knew backspace didn't do anything on my Ubuntu machine, and I didn't find any option for it, though it didn't bug me enough to look that hard.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  49. Obligatory by Cristofori42 · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    "Is that dad? Either that or Batman's really let himself go."
    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you.

  50. How about they freaking disable Ctrl+W by Skythe · · Score: 1

    .. while they're at it. Worst key combo ever. Hit it all the time. Don't try this at home.

    1. Re:How about they freaking disable Ctrl+W by mattventura · · Score: 1

      I can't count the times I've tried to hit Ctrl-W to delete a word in a browser. At least there's Ctrl-Shift-T.

    2. Re:How about they freaking disable Ctrl+W by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The worst is I usually hit it right after saving (Ctrl+S) meaning I don't even get the "You haven't saved" warning as a unintended protection.

    3. Re:How about they freaking disable Ctrl+W by Jezral · · Score: 1

      I hope that's a joke. Ctrl-W is the primary way I close tabs, and trivially undone with Ctrl-Shift-T.

    4. Re:How about they freaking disable Ctrl+W by Cow+Jones · · Score: 1

      Just press Ctrl+Shift+T and your tab is back.
      There are also extensions to configure keyboard shortcuts for Firefox and Chrome, if you hate it that much.

      --

      Ah, arrogance and stupidity, all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari
  51. Better yet by sjames · · Score: 1

    How about saving the state before going back for any reason. Then the forward button can reload the state and you don't have to re-type anything.

    That way, if any of the several other ways you might accidentally go back are also covered.

    1. Re:Better yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about saving state before going forward, too, so back doesn't reload anything either.

    2. Re:Better yet by sjames · · Score: 1

      That would be reasonable.

  52. Re:Really? This was a design decision, not a bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No it won't. You can easily test this yourself. Paste the following in a file:
    <input id="foo" value="Consectetur" />
    <textarea id="bar">Lorem ipsum</textarea>

    First go to about:blank, then to your test file. Edit the contents of the fields. Click on the background. Press backspace. Voilà, your edits are lost.

  53. Re:Really? This was a design decision, not a bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If true (I wouldn't know, I don't use FogBugz) that's at least partly the fault of FogBugz, since when you press the forward arrow (or alt+right) the browser restores the form fields (at least, Firefox does) and this always works unless some buggy page scripting is trampling over the form fields.

  54. Re:Really? This was a design decision, not a bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note: unless the web page has some really buggy scripting going on, you can just go forward (alt+right arrow) and the form is restored, with all your input intact.

  55. Alt+Left by tepples · · Score: 1

    Be usable by keyboard and mouse -- increasingly gone in many programs, especially frequently updated ones desperately trying to be hip

    At least with backspace no longer going Back, Alt+Left will probably still go Back. And for all it apes Chrome, Firefox still has a traditional menu bar that you can show with the Alt key.

  56. Would making Enter act like Tab be enough? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Then a web form could use JavaScript to remap Enter to act like Tab unless either A. Ctrl+Enter was pressed, or B. one of the call-to-action buttons at the end of the form is focused. Would this be enough?

    1. Re:Would making Enter act like Tab be enough? by lgw · · Score: 1

      I liked the large, bright green Xmit button myself (below the right shift). Dedicated hardware FTW.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  57. Navigation confirmation without script by tepples · · Score: 1

    Then it becomes a nuisance for read-only pages where fast key navigation is very useful.

    Alt+Left, Alt+Right

    it is the form developer's fault for not building a navigation confirmation into their page

    With JavaScript, one can add a listener for the beforeunload event. But a lot of pop-up ads have abused onbeforeunload to add an "are you sure you want to close this ad?" alert. Besides, how should a form developer do this in an environment where JavaScript is blocked, such as NoScript, LibreJS, tracking blockers that mistakenly block the CDN hosting a script, or a corporate MITM proxy put in place "to block ransomware". That's why some Slashdot users have recommended using the heuristic of a text input or text area that the user has modified as a proxy for there being substantial unsaved changes.

    1. Re:Navigation confirmation without script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alt+Left, Alt+Right

      Both of which require two hands, therefore reducing the "power" of fast key navigation.

  58. Palm on trackpad by tepples · · Score: 1

    When you are editing text, backspace edits text.
    When you are not editing text, backspace takes you back.

    Accidentally touching your laptop's trackpad with your palm can change the input state from "editing text" to "not editing text". So add a third line:

    When you are editing text, but you accidentally touch part of your computer wrong, backspace takes you back.

    1. Re:Palm on trackpad by sexconker · · Score: 1

      You don't get to complain about time lost inputting data when you chose a fucking laptop keyboard and trackpad to input that data.

      It's like showing up to work late because you chose to commute on a pogo stick, then blaming the stairs for letting you go up or down them depending on how you lean, and you lean back 2 times for every 3 times you lean forward.

  59. Ducking piece of shift with an Fn key by tepples · · Score: 1

    Modifiers don't help, because Ctrl+Home and Ctrl+End are also indispensable, as are Ctrl+Shit+Home and Ctrl+Shit+End.

    Is your keyboard a piece of "Shit"?

    Seriously, a compact keyboard might map Home and End to Fn+Left and Fn+Right. Then Ctrl+Home, Ctrl+End, Ctrl+Shift+Home, Ctrl+Shift+End would become Ctrl+Fn+Home, Ctrl+Fn+End, Ctrl+Shift+Fn+Home, and Ctrl+Shift+Fn+End. And if you aim your left pinky well, you can hit all three modifiers (Ctrl+Shift+Fn).

    1. Re:Ducking piece of shift with an Fn key by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

      Oh great, so all I need to do is install programmable keyboards and/or key mapping software on the 2 laptops and 3 desktop I personally use, every terminal in the server lab and every team member workstation that I pair program on. Problem solved I guess, how silly of me.

    2. Re:Ducking piece of shift with an Fn key by tepples · · Score: 1

      Assuming parent comment was sarcastic:

      Desktop keyboards have Home and End keys. This includes your three desktops, the terminals in the server lab, and the team member workstations on which you pair program. And the two laptops that lack Home and End are likely to have the Fn key combinations that I described.

  60. Touch to click can move focus by tepples · · Score: 1

    You must be a very slow typist if you take time to check, before each press of backspace, whether or not your palm has since contacted your laptop's trackpad to cause a click event that changes the focus.

    1. Re:Touch to click can move focus by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Why would you have to check? The cursor is literally right there, where you're looking, as you type.
      Further, I don't use a laptop or a trackpad, because I value my ability to get shit done.

    2. Re:Touch to click can move focus by tepples · · Score: 1

      I don't use a laptop or a trackpad, because I value my ability to get shit done.

      Even while away from a desk? Please see my other comment.

    3. Re:Touch to click can move focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No doubt you're the same sort of mong who thinks left click should open links in a new tab/window too. Use the middle button to open a link in a new tab. Even Macs have three button mice these days!

    4. Re:Touch to click can move focus by tepples · · Score: 1

      Though laptop PCs rarely have three-button trackpads, Ctrl+click usually opens a link's target in a new tab. But either way, that's still unrelated to the problem of an accidental left-click removing the focus from a textarea.

  61. Forms in original HTML or in JavaScript by tepples · · Score: 1

    In Firefox 46, forms that are part of the initial HTML document get restored properly, but forms created through scripted manipulation of the DOM, such as Slashdot's current reply form, usually don't. A workaround on Slashdot is to use the old reply form, which I can access by middle-clicking "Reply to This" or by right-clicking it and choosing "Open Link in New Tab".

  62. If (cursor = in text field) { backspace text } by contr0l · · Score: 1

    If (cursor = in text field) { backspace text } Else { Go Back one page } EOF

  63. Re: Really? This was a design decision, not a bug by NuShrike · · Score: 1

    And then they rediscover pull-to-refresh is still there.

  64. Mouse forward back button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find the mouse forward and back buttons even more annoying and I don't want to install some bloated Logitech driver. So easy to grab the mouse and accidentally press those buttons, very annoying when in a browser based game for example.

  65. Keep it optional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But if the default has less ability for the old people to not screw up, so be it.

  66. I use it constantly, and love it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used the backspace when helping my dad with his computer and I tell him, "Go back a page" and he says "What? What for? Why? I did this and that and now you're making me do this again?!?! Ok fine fine! How do I go back a page?" Which then gets tedious to re-explain the reason I want him to go back and how to do it every time. He does this constantly while I'm showing him how to use his computer or accomplish a task with it. Unbelievably irritating and he blames me for him not listening or memorizing, e.g. "Oh, you're going to mess up my computer again." While I'm helping him get the viruses off that HE installed. I tend to just reach over while he's busy tormenting me and just tap the backspace key. Then I continue with the instructions and he's none the wiser, literally. I imagine having to reach between him and the computer to press two keys at once, i.e. alt + left arrow, is going to be awkward and lead to an extended argument. It also involves breaking the "privacy bubble" people have around their personal body to get at his keyboard. Which means I'm going to instead just have to argue with him about going back a page instead. This is going to suck. I get that people don't focus on the form they're entering data in and don't pay attention to the blinking cursor before pressing backspace, but I've never had this problem myself.

    1. Re:I use it constantly, and love it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      one finger backspace + porn = leaves the other hand free

  67. Re:Really? This was a design decision, not a bug? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that this had little to do with the browser and more to do with how someone programmed the site. I see this behaviour quite inconsistently across both web forms and dodgy pop-up advertising that sneaks through the adblocker.

  68. Ctrl+Q by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to say I've never triggered this one by accident. ctrl+Q on the other hand, fuck that one pisses me off. Half way between "next tab" and "close tab" should NOT be "shut down the whole fucking browser"!

  69. Please stop by CptLoRes · · Score: 1

    Please stop fixing problems for the few, at the expense of pretty much everybody else. This is a problem you find repeatedly in pretty much all big name software today.

  70. Easy fix - save it for the user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They could just have it so when you click back then forward, the form is automatically filled out with the data you left.

  71. Ah, the dreaded backspace in a browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this is one the most awful decisions to use backspace key as back arrow in browsers.

  72. What about the “forward” button? by Theovon · · Score: 1

    Another good fix would be to have a “forward” button that returns them to the page they were on with everything intact.

    Although to be honest, I’ve always thought that backspace was a stupid hotkey for “back.” It never worked consistently in any browser I’ve ever used, so I never got into the habit of using it.

  73. It's called backsapce not backpage! by Gunstick · · Score: 1

    I hated it on MSIE and I hate it everywhere where I encounter it.
    Firefox is nice: typing something on a form and the backspace functionality is disabled.
    Still I would like it to not even exist.

    Why not ctrl-left oder something similar?

    --
    Atari rules... ermm... ruled.
  74. Re:Really? This was a design decision, not a bug? by jafiwam · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that this had little to do with the browser and more to do with how someone programmed the site. I see this behaviour quite inconsistently across both web forms and dodgy pop-up advertising that sneaks through the adblocker.

    Perhaps the web sites that fuck with the focus of your cursor should be the ones you are mad at? Grabbing focus with a large shadowbox and a nag form about a spammy email newsletter is the problem, not the browser.

  75. Wrong approach by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    I like the shortcut, but I agree that some forms don't play nice with it and it is easy to accidentally flip back when you don't want to. Instead of stripping the feature, they should instead make it harder to accidentally trigger - something like ctrl+backspace.

  76. Add a convenient delete key to Chromebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Then... Users won't have the problem mentioned here.

  77. #ohthankgod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the hell would the backspace take me away from the web app that I'm currently working in?

  78. ABOUT F*&KING TIME! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been long overdue and should never have been implemented in the first place. I can't tell you how many god damn times I have had to refill and entire form just because of this bullshit behavior.

  79. There is a better shortcut for this: by danieldids · · Score: 1

    All hail to the ALT Left/Right arrows!

  80. As a curmudgeon... by Daetrin · · Score: 1

    I am very excited about this announcement both because whoever came up with the original design "feature" was a horrible human being and deserves to fry in the afterlife, but also because it proves that i do not actually hate all change! Some change is good!

    Now if you'll excuse me, i need to get back my losing fight to keep using the Classic/XP Windows UI, menu bars instead of ribbons, and the KitKat Google UI.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  81. Fix Backspace, okay, now how about TAB? by davros74 · · Score: 1

    I often include code snippets or shell text in my emails, which I can format as Fixed Space (only one fixed space font, thanks Google), but there is no way I can tell in the web interface of GMail to insert tabs into email text to column align data. (Tab being used to navigate, not enter text).

    How hard is to make TAB work like normal tab when inside a text entry box, or just be able to assign some other key sequence to tab (ctl+tab) or something and leave tab for what it was intended to do?

    I have heard the old ALT+NUM_KEY pad works to insert a tab character, but that's a hack and useless for me anyway, since I primarily use a tenkeyless keyboard.

    If there is a way, someone please enlighten me. Whenever I want to send a technical email, I compose it first in VIM and then I have to use copy/paste in Gmail. How they can't fix this oversight after years of being requested in the forums is beyond me.

  82. I can reach Right Alt+Left with one hand by tepples · · Score: 1

    I can reach right Alt with my right thumb and Left and Right with my right pinky. It's easy on a laptop, where the arrow keys are up under the right Shift key. I admit it's a stretch on a full-size desktop keyboard, but a desktop keyboard is more likely to have dedicated "multimedia keys" for Back and Forward. Or do browsers used with European keyboards map AltGr in such a way that AltGr+Left and AltGr+Right do not go back and forward?

    1. Re:I can reach Right Alt+Left with one hand by _133MHz · · Score: 1

      I've just tried that with my Spanish ISO layout keyboard on Firefox, and indeed AltGr+Left / Right doesn't work at all as Back / Forward like the left Alt key does, at least on this particular setup. Funny how in all these years such a thought never crossed my mind.

  83. Not everyone has a desk all the time by tepples · · Score: 1

    You don't get to complain about time lost inputting data when you chose a fucking laptop keyboard and trackpad to input that data.

    I chose a laptop because choosing otherwise would have resulted in not inputting data at all while I wait to arrive at a desk. Not all work situations in which one is expected to input data provide a desk on which to set a separate keyboard and mouse. Using a laptop while a passenger on a bus, train, or airplane is an example.

  84. Small convenience for some not worth lost work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who think their small convenience is worth everyone else freaking out because they lost minutes or hours worth of work suck.

    You can:

    - Alt-left
    - click back-arrow with the mouse
    - install an extension that gives you this special behavior - may you lose hours worth of work daily until you repent and uninstall it.

  85. Re:Really? This was a design decision, not a bug? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    So you're back to square one then with a stupid UI choice (button used when filling in the form can direct a browser away from a page) and resorting to nagware with users? Because we all know how well nagware works.

    No I'm well and truly mad at whoever thought there needs to be more than one back button on the keyboard, and whoever decided to make that a common non-escaped typing character. It was an abortion of a choice from the very beginning.

  86. How about you learn a new key combination. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ctrl+Shift+t

    Viola - tab unclosed. Works in Chrome, FF, Opera.

    Or do you use Windowed browsing?

  87. Why doesn't "Forward" work? by Keybounce · · Score: 1

    The real problem isn't that "go back" loses your work.
    The real problem is that "Go forward" doesn't take you back where you were.

    Where I was is a state, not a URL.

    I don't want the URL reloaded, I want the state of the page restored.

  88. NoScript by tepples · · Score: 1

    How does the page save the state

    HTML5 local storage?

    Local storage requires JavaScript. Users can block JavaScript from running, and proxies running on corporate networks can block JavaScript files from being retrieved.

    I'm not sure what 'non-free' script means

    The Free Software Foundation has released a browser extension called LibreJS that causes JavaScript not to run at all unless it can be identified as having been released under a free software license. But because you weren't aware of it, I'll try again with a related question:

    How does the page save the state if the user or the user's network is blocking JavaScript as a security measure?

    1. Re:NoScript by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

      How does the page save the state if the user or the user's network is blocking JavaScript as a security measure?

      Well it's not, is it? As you said, it's blocking the set of JavaScript libraries not released under a free software license. Surely, within that set of JavaScript libraries, there is one for managing local storage? You make it sound like they are literally blocking the execution or download of all JS, in which case I don't know how they expect to load any page made in the last 15 years.

      Or, you could just follow the simple instructions that I found in 5 seconds of Googling on how to release your own JavaScript so that it will be accepted by LibreJS.

    2. Re:NoScript by tepples · · Score: 1

      A company operating a website whose code is otherwise proprietary is unlikely to be willing to release the form data saving code as free software.

      And this still leaves open the question of how to handle users who do not use JavaScript at all.

    3. Re:NoScript by GodelEscherBlecch · · Score: 1

      A company operating a website whose code is otherwise proprietary is unlikely to be willing to release

      Another 5 seconds on Google turns up 10 free JS libraries for managing local storage, which if you recall was option 1. You are the one who ignored that and went straight to option 2 to complain about how impractical it is, when it is in fact your only remaining option after option 1, which is moot, because option 1 is completely practical.

      And this still leaves open the question of how to handle users who do not use JavaScript at all.

      Everything I deliver is scrutinized for dependency usage, scanned for vulnerabilities and interrogated for sound architecture by some very anal retentive folks implementing some very extensive security standards. The software is then deployed into some very secure physical sites to be used on their very locked down workstations. In all of this, I have never heard anybody ask for a web UI with JS turned off. I suppose I will cross that bridge when I get there, but I get the feeling you are just being willfully obstinate in posing this as a refutation of the idea that a web page is capable of managing its own state.

  89. The first good thing in Chrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why did they ever even change the backspace key to take you back a page?!? It was never on by default in the 90's, and I have no idea who first started the dumb idea, but they should probably be shot. That's my opinion.

  90. dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is incredibly frustrating. i always use the backspace key to go back and their reasoning is nonsensical. should be a browser setting at the very least. i don't want to have to install more software to regain basic functionality that i have been using for over 20 years.

  91. Adding Undo would work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about adding an Undo or Forward feature which would probable be a better option.

  92. They should add an option to re-enable it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's sad that they removed this feature. For a while now I was wondering what was wrong with my keyboard because the backspace button wouldn't work to go back to the previous page in Chrome. Why would they remove a feature that has been there for ages? And for such a low percentage of people who misuse the backspace button by accident? Of course the latter has happened to me before, but it rarely does and I *always* use this button to navigate to the previous page. They should at least give us the option to use it if we want to.

  93. Just build a better back function by allo · · Score: 1

    opera had back and forward buttons, which just switch the whole site including state, instead of reloading the previous/next page.

  94. how about by crbowman · · Score: 1

    So, wait. Let me get this straight. People are typing into a form, hit back space, thinking it will delete a character and instead it goes to the previous page and you loose everything you typed into the form? How about cacheing that text in the form the you go back a page instead of reassigning the meaning of backspace in browsers? And while we're at it, how about you fix Chrome so that when I hit tab in a gmail compose window I get a tab instead of jumping to the send button. I've sent a whole bunch of annoying empty emails because of this.

  95. Thank you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you,!

    That feature drives me nuts!

  96. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD YES! by adamzg · · Score: 1

    I've been waiting for years for this. Anyone who has ever sat with a crying child, or adult really, who just lost something important to them because they hit the backspace and got yanked to a previous page appreciates just what a horrible, horrible UX decision this was. I cannot think of any other UX I've seen that LITERALLY makes people cry. It's about time!