Haptic feedback tells you that you pressed *a* button (if you leave it turned on). iPhone users are more likely to look at their typing finger than at the number display to see which button they pressed.
I know my main Android keyboard lights up the key in addition to the haptic feedback, and it has never prevented my continued typing.
The app doesn't use the OS keyboard. The whole screen is a calculator and the buttons are there. And for some dumb reason it won't read those buttons while playing an animation. Despite this, I'm fairly sure that their OS keyboard animated in a non blocking way.
Would you prefer no feedback that the keypress registered? Physical keys give audible and tactile feedback. Just because they were doing it wrong doesn't mean it was the wrong thing to do.
There's nothing wrong with animation. It gives feedback the same way as the click of a key on a physical keyboard. It's only the implementation that's at fault here.
they're (gender neutral) "pretty or handsome" (easily genderless, at least in combination) and they are both adjectives and complimentary. I'm not sure what they missed here.
In what way is Six Apart a Russian company? It is a Japanese company that acquired Livejournal and then sold that to a Russian company (SUP Media). Six Apart is still not a Russian company.
I won't buy a Samsung because I like plain Android and it's a lot of trouble to put everything back the way I like it. I still want a nice Android phone.
But yes, there are economic solutions. Homeless are on the street because they can't get their medicines (either because of practical/money problems or their own mental state), and it's a self-repeating cycle. Residential institutions for the mentally ill are still needed today, but most have closed due to modern medicines and lack of funding - despite there still being a need. The economic solution would give them somewhere to live.
My point is that the only firms that approach gender equity are the ones that are big enough to attract and hire the best women developers out there.
At smaller companies they may indeed be diversity hires, because the pool is not large. I don't believe that's because women are any less capable - but they're obviously fewer in number right from the introductory university course.
In other words, we've narrowed the set of use cases affected by this restriction to where (i) only one person is watching (ii) a short video for which (iii) fine detail is important.
Not really. You were actually saying this somehow encourages people to view video on a smaller device rather than a larger screen. I'm telling you why the size of the screen doesn't really determine what quality is desired - I mostly always want a sharp picture.
Would you prefer that phone bills double to cover the purchase of additional land on which to erect more towers?
Don't be disingenuous. Their rates are already high enough to cover that. They'd just rather engage in deceptive marketing and call it all profit.
Apache Struts had plenty of quality control. The bugs in question were patched LONG before any breach. The fact that it's open source is what enabled a third-party security company to discover and report the security vulnerability so quickly.
It's a double-edged sword, since not patching your systems means that vulnerabilities are published for all to see. But the patch was available.
This x 1000. This is primary the reason why I don't recommend a Fire Stick, Chromecast, or Apple TV to any of my customers - this is why it works with almost everything. The UI and remote is the other.
Next will be when everyone moves their stuff to an "internal" cloud. Just like when people moved off of timeshare mainframes to computers on premise.
Nah - caching/boost server on premises. So you can have a thin cloud server to go with your thin clients.
Haptic feedback tells you that you pressed *a* button (if you leave it turned on). iPhone users are more likely to look at their typing finger than at the number display to see which button they pressed.
I know my main Android keyboard lights up the key in addition to the haptic feedback, and it has never prevented my continued typing.
The app doesn't use the OS keyboard. The whole screen is a calculator and the buttons are there. And for some dumb reason it won't read those buttons while playing an animation. Despite this, I'm fairly sure that their OS keyboard animated in a non blocking way.
Would you prefer no feedback that the keypress registered? Physical keys give audible and tactile feedback. Just because they were doing it wrong doesn't mean it was the wrong thing to do.
There's nothing wrong with animation. It gives feedback the same way as the click of a key on a physical keyboard. It's only the implementation that's at fault here.
They're machines. They are fine with inclusive OR.
I really wonder if the Republican party will even back him for re-election or officially support a different candidate. It has happened before.
they're (gender neutral) "pretty or handsome" (easily genderless, at least in combination) and they are both adjectives and complimentary. I'm not sure what they missed here.
So two groups of people did illegal things. That doesn't diminish this case one bit.
upvote everyone in the thread
Effectively accomplishing nothing.
They can make them whites only, blacks only, jews only, etc. There are no laws anywhere stating otherwise.
Yeah, there are. Just like I can't open a restaurant and put a "No Blacks" sign on the door.
It's how you create or acquire the pictures that are dangerous. See: child porn.
In what way is Six Apart a Russian company? It is a Japanese company that acquired Livejournal and then sold that to a Russian company (SUP Media). Six Apart is still not a Russian company.
I won't buy a Samsung because I like plain Android and it's a lot of trouble to put everything back the way I like it. I still want a nice Android phone.
those that cannot or will not remain on necessary medications after treatment should be institutionalized
Which gives them somewhere to live and exactly what I meant.
There are not economic solutions to mental problems.
There is less mental illness in primitive societies. Living here literally helps you go crazy.
But yes, there are economic solutions. Homeless are on the street because they can't get their medicines (either because of practical/money problems or their own mental state), and it's a self-repeating cycle. Residential institutions for the mentally ill are still needed today, but most have closed due to modern medicines and lack of funding - despite there still being a need. The economic solution would give them somewhere to live.
Said with the compassion of Darwin. If you're not the fittest, you don't even deserve to survive?
The homeless don't have mud huts or the means to move somewhere where mud is abundant.
All observations show that they're indeed less capable here -- on the average.
I don't disagree with that. But the vast majority of men don't choose to become engineers either. So overall, it's more a matter of choice.
My point is that the only firms that approach gender equity are the ones that are big enough to attract and hire the best women developers out there.
At smaller companies they may indeed be diversity hires, because the pool is not large. I don't believe that's because women are any less capable - but they're obviously fewer in number right from the introductory university course.
In other words, we've narrowed the set of use cases affected by this restriction to where (i) only one person is watching (ii) a short video for which (iii) fine detail is important.
Not really. You were actually saying this somehow encourages people to view video on a smaller device rather than a larger screen. I'm telling you why the size of the screen doesn't really determine what quality is desired - I mostly always want a sharp picture.
Would you prefer that phone bills double to cover the purchase of additional land on which to erect more towers?
Don't be disingenuous. Their rates are already high enough to cover that. They'd just rather engage in deceptive marketing and call it all profit.
Apache Struts had plenty of quality control. The bugs in question were patched LONG before any breach. The fact that it's open source is what enabled a third-party security company to discover and report the security vulnerability so quickly.
It's a double-edged sword, since not patching your systems means that vulnerabilities are published for all to see. But the patch was available.
So watch 30 minute content. Or a Youtube video. It still doesn't validate why the restriction should vary.
This is not to say that very highly skilled female/minority engineers don't exist
Absolutely agree. And the reason why so many of them work at Google is because they can.
This x 1000. This is primary the reason why I don't recommend a Fire Stick, Chromecast, or Apple TV to any of my customers - this is why it works with almost everything. The UI and remote is the other.