You must not have ever seen the black dirt in parts of the midwest. Sure, a lot of this carbon is left behind from burning prairie grasses, but the color of the dirt alone says there is an excess of carbon.
Does it matter that forests and grass are not a true carbon sink? Losing them is a net carbon loss. Preserving them or expanding them is still important. The equilibrium will keep some carbon perpetually sunk.
Does iPad Pro even properly support external storage in a way that lets apps access it natively? I know this is solved for the Surface Pro - it's a real computer.
what's the advantage of recording at more than 48 kHz sample rate?
That's why you downmix at the end. Think about it like editing a photo. If you have a 20MP photo, you do all your edits to that before you downsample to 1000 pixels wide. If you resize first and then apply effects at the final output resolution, any artifacts or noise will show up in the final output. If you apply those effects at the full size, those artifacts will all be invisible by the time you resample down to your output size.
In audio production, you often apply half a dozen DSP effects or more to each track. That comes with a certain amount of generational loss. Having some extra overhead will mean that the loss is a lot less likely to be in the audible range. When blending multiple tracks for the final output, you also have to have room to average those waveforms together (this part can just use an internally higher sample rate for the combining, but having more data is still better).
Does this mean you can't record at 48-bit and have perfect sounding audio in your output? By all means, no. But if you're doing pro-level audio, you just take that extra insurance for every project before you worry about whether you need it or not.
And then you'd need a dongle for the audio interface and a way to connect external storage. By that point, you've made it a computer again. Multitrack audio gets large fast - especially if you record in a higher sample rate and only resample down for the final mix.
And even the original iPad has Bluetooth keyboard support. For that matter, it will support the very same keyboard you probably use with your iMac. Keyboard cases are overrated. If you have room somewhere to set down the tablet and the keyboard, then you can probably easily carry the keyboard separately anyway.
There is reason to doubt whether the material in question is even protected by copyright. Ostensibly, a photograph is copyrightable by virtue of the artistic nature of its composition,
Something doesn't have to be art to earn a copyright - see college textbooks. It just has to be created by someone with some effort. No matter how bad you are at photography, your composition is slightly more than just a collection of facts (which is not copyrightable).
Zillow doesn't actually hold any copyright on most of the images posted to their site. The terms state they do have license to do whatever they want with them, but not that ownership is transferred to them. Not sure if Zillow could enforce copyright on someone else's behalf..
I really don't think they can. This will get really interesting if one of the photographers sees this story and grants permission for their photos.
An agreement between Zillow and a photographer is non-binding to a third-party blogger.
It's probably not an assignment of copyright either. So Zillow has no standing to sue, as these aren't their images - just images that they've acquired a license to use.
Zillow probably didn't even take the photos. They have a irrevocable license and probably a right to sublicense and all that business according to their terms, but they would leave copyright in the hands of the real estate agent or photographer where it belongs.
My backlog is many years at the rate that I play games, and it's true that I wait for a discount too. But I'm not aggressively cheap unless by accident. The cost of a good game is about the price of a trip for 2 to a movie theater and I get way more entertainment and usually get to support someone smaller at the same time.
I don't play AAA titles so much, but more adventure games (think Myst and its descendants) and these games usually have 20-30 hours of gameplay minimum without any boredom or repetition..
Build what in? They aren't losses. They're just non-sales. Unless you're only talking about shoplifting, but the stores/insurers cover those losses - not the publisher.
Because he's saying that not everyone who pirated the game couldn't afford it. He's clearly saying that some people are too cheap to support the entertainment that they consume.
And that's leaving out the accuracy component - which the Pi is too slow to do perfectly. Just look at the system requirements for Higan for NES and SNES.
You must not have ever seen the black dirt in parts of the midwest. Sure, a lot of this carbon is left behind from burning prairie grasses, but the color of the dirt alone says there is an excess of carbon.
Does it matter that forests and grass are not a true carbon sink? Losing them is a net carbon loss. Preserving them or expanding them is still important. The equilibrium will keep some carbon perpetually sunk.
Lots of pumped storage goes underground. This has most of the drawbacks of fracking, but there's a lot of underground rock out there.
Google is your monopolistic friend:
https://twitter.com/microcente...
They're having a corporate network outage, it seems. Their phones are down too.
Does iPad Pro even properly support external storage in a way that lets apps access it natively? I know this is solved for the Surface Pro - it's a real computer.
I'm not saying piracy isn't stealing. Just that they were not lost customers. They are mostly people that would probably never have bought anyway.
what's the advantage of recording at more than 48 kHz sample rate?
That's why you downmix at the end. Think about it like editing a photo. If you have a 20MP photo, you do all your edits to that before you downsample to 1000 pixels wide. If you resize first and then apply effects at the final output resolution, any artifacts or noise will show up in the final output. If you apply those effects at the full size, those artifacts will all be invisible by the time you resample down to your output size.
In audio production, you often apply half a dozen DSP effects or more to each track. That comes with a certain amount of generational loss. Having some extra overhead will mean that the loss is a lot less likely to be in the audible range. When blending multiple tracks for the final output, you also have to have room to average those waveforms together (this part can just use an internally higher sample rate for the combining, but having more data is still better).
Does this mean you can't record at 48-bit and have perfect sounding audio in your output? By all means, no. But if you're doing pro-level audio, you just take that extra insurance for every project before you worry about whether you need it or not.
That's more somewhere I'd be using an on-screen keyboard. Can you really make the iPad stand up with the case keyboard on a lap on the bus?
And then you'd need a dongle for the audio interface and a way to connect external storage. By that point, you've made it a computer again. Multitrack audio gets large fast - especially if you record in a higher sample rate and only resample down for the final mix.
And even the original iPad has Bluetooth keyboard support. For that matter, it will support the very same keyboard you probably use with your iMac. Keyboard cases are overrated. If you have room somewhere to set down the tablet and the keyboard, then you can probably easily carry the keyboard separately anyway.
I thought it was "Failed Edition."
The people that don't buy are still not part of the formula - you only have to reach a certain number of people that do buy. That's it.
There is reason to doubt whether the material in question is even protected by copyright. Ostensibly, a photograph is copyrightable by virtue of the artistic nature of its composition,
Something doesn't have to be art to earn a copyright - see college textbooks. It just has to be created by someone with some effort. No matter how bad you are at photography, your composition is slightly more than just a collection of facts (which is not copyrightable).
Zillow doesn't actually hold any copyright on most of the images posted to their site. The terms state they do have license to do whatever they want with them, but not that ownership is transferred to them. Not sure if Zillow could enforce copyright on someone else's behalf..
I really don't think they can. This will get really interesting if one of the photographers sees this story and grants permission for their photos.
An agreement between Zillow and a photographer is non-binding to a third-party blogger.
It's probably not an assignment of copyright either. So Zillow has no standing to sue, as these aren't their images - just images that they've acquired a license to use.
Zillow probably didn't even take the photos. They have a irrevocable license and probably a right to sublicense and all that business according to their terms, but they would leave copyright in the hands of the real estate agent or photographer where it belongs.
Why do you think this ended up in the news? Guy went to the press hoping someone will fund him.
It had 3-month warranty from its manufacturer.
And you still bought it? That's a huge red flag right there.
Consideration does not have to be monetary. In this case, the consideration provided by the site is the content (IANAL, but this is basic stuff).
My backlog is many years at the rate that I play games, and it's true that I wait for a discount too. But I'm not aggressively cheap unless by accident. The cost of a good game is about the price of a trip for 2 to a movie theater and I get way more entertainment and usually get to support someone smaller at the same time.
I don't play AAA titles so much, but more adventure games (think Myst and its descendants) and these games usually have 20-30 hours of gameplay minimum without any boredom or repetition..
Hey, I bought Snow Leopard at retail (I think it was under $14.99), and the Mac App store gave me free upgrades from there.
They build it in as cost of doing business.
Build what in? They aren't losses. They're just non-sales. Unless you're only talking about shoplifting, but the stores/insurers cover those losses - not the publisher.
So paying didn't get rid of the nag? I would have been mad.
Because he's saying that not everyone who pirated the game couldn't afford it. He's clearly saying that some people are too cheap to support the entertainment that they consume.
And that's leaving out the accuracy component - which the Pi is too slow to do perfectly. Just look at the system requirements for Higan for NES and SNES.
It was really easy to put ROM dumps onto the NES classic and expand its library. Really easy.