The image processing algorithm tries to find the motion blur and remove it from the frames. They do a bad job and basically try to draw in what "should" be there in its place.
The problem is that 60fps - 120fps is more of an uncanny valley. Even if the eye can only sample at a couple hundred hertz, your eye isn't synced to the display. You'd need 1000Hz or more before motion even starts to feel real. Similar to the resolution leap to "retina" displays that exceed human acuity.
What I think is happening is that the CRT is producing a kind of impulse sampling of the moving image whereas the LCD is producing zero-order hold (square-step, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]) output. The human visual centers appear to perceive the "strobed" image of the CRT as smooth motion, the "change-and-hold" image of the LCD as blurred, even at high frame rates and with rapid pixel response.
Right idea, wrong conclusion. Phosphor glows for a few seconds after the electrons hit it. If you've ever looked at an incandescent light bulb after turning it off, you'd see it glows for several seconds before going completely dark. The actual effect is ghosting, but the perceived effect is smoother motion transition.
So how often do you sample the CCD? That sampling rate is your frame rate. And keep in mind that today's "frame" is an accumulation of all the light hitting the sensor since the last frame. To sample more frequently, you get less light and a noisier image. Yes, you can do something like a "rolling shutter" but there are limits before it starts messing with motion.
Given little to no content is captured at 60fps or even an integer multiple of it there is more than just compression going on.
Wrong...Most content is captured at either 59.94fps interlaced or 24fps. That 24fps is converted via 3:2 pulldown to 59.94, the same way most DVD and Blu-Ray players do when playing on a TV without 24Hz playback. 60fps is just a convenient rounding that ignores the complexity and legacy of the original analog signal.
Who's being the pedant now? You're saying that the rules for taxis and limos are both contained in the same long-form "law" but are entirely separate within it... That's about as pedantic as it can get, since the relevant thing here is that the rules are different for both.
It goes beyond color accuracy and resolution. A true depth of field range can't be achieved with a lens that small. They were using real depth of field to show what fake simulated depth of field would look like. See the article for yourself - they're doing a lot more than using it as a placeholder image on a phone screen. They're advertising it as the actual capability.
Limos don't follow taxi laws either. Calling it "ride sharing" doesn't help their case, but being a private hire vehicle not hailed from the street makes quite a bit of difference with the way most of the laws are written.
He makes about $50,000/year driving. The money left over paid part of his rent
So after expenses it doesn't even cover all of rent? I know rent is high in NYC but $50k only pays part of rent? Or are you confusing gross revenue with net profit (income)?
No, it's totally valid. Especially is it's a side job and you have a regular commute. You see that car depreciation and maintenance expense, but you can't quantify how it affects your bottom line very easily. In this case externalized means external to your business budget and perceived profit/loss.
I can't tell if you're stupid or just willfully ignorant. The same hardware can either be efficient, cool, and quiet or just run faster and get a lot more performance at the cost of heat. In more recent CPUs, they do BOTH. No amount of efficiency gains would be wasted on keeping the CPU cooler unless the higher performance is never needed.
Yeah, they're barely surviving on the margins they have now, so they would be forced to raise prices rather than take slightly lower profit to keep their laptops at a marketable price point.
ChromeOS is successful, but it still falls short of a good web-centric OS. Treating multiple open processes as simply "tabs" makes it really hard to get around. If specific web apps could get their own icon on the taskbar (and could still have subtabs), a Windows derivation has a good chance at being more usable. Task-switching is painful when everything is a tab in a monolithic window.
This is not the same thing as a notice for cancellation. In fact, it could make it worse compounded together. For example, if you only couldn't cancel in the middle of a billing cycle to not lose money, you could cancel the day after your next billing cycle starts and only have to pay for one month you don't want. If you combine that with 30 days notice in a calendar month with 30 days, you would have to pay for a whole second unwanted month because 30 days later would be into the following billing cycle.
It's not inaccurate. Cable/Satellite providers don't recompress an uncompressed feed. They get the OTA-ready MPEG-2 transport stream. They may not add much in the way of additional compression artifacts, but it's inevitable.
Slashdot Mirror
The image processing algorithm tries to find the motion blur and remove it from the frames. They do a bad job and basically try to draw in what "should" be there in its place.
The problem is that 60fps - 120fps is more of an uncanny valley. Even if the eye can only sample at a couple hundred hertz, your eye isn't synced to the display. You'd need 1000Hz or more before motion even starts to feel real. Similar to the resolution leap to "retina" displays that exceed human acuity.
What I think is happening is that the CRT is producing a kind of impulse sampling of the moving image whereas the LCD is producing zero-order hold (square-step, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]) output. The human visual centers appear to perceive the "strobed" image of the CRT as smooth motion, the "change-and-hold" image of the LCD as blurred, even at high frame rates and with rapid pixel response.
Right idea, wrong conclusion. Phosphor glows for a few seconds after the electrons hit it. If you've ever looked at an incandescent light bulb after turning it off, you'd see it glows for several seconds before going completely dark. The actual effect is ghosting, but the perceived effect is smoother motion transition.
So how often do you sample the CCD? That sampling rate is your frame rate. And keep in mind that today's "frame" is an accumulation of all the light hitting the sensor since the last frame. To sample more frequently, you get less light and a noisier image. Yes, you can do something like a "rolling shutter" but there are limits before it starts messing with motion.
I couldn't read half of that, but of the half I did I can assure you that the cameras are not recording uncompressed.
Given little to no content is captured at 60fps or even an integer multiple of it there is more than just compression going on.
Wrong...Most content is captured at either 59.94fps interlaced or 24fps. That 24fps is converted via 3:2 pulldown to 59.94, the same way most DVD and Blu-Ray players do when playing on a TV without 24Hz playback. 60fps is just a convenient rounding that ignores the complexity and legacy of the original analog signal.
Who's being the pedant now? You're saying that the rules for taxis and limos are both contained in the same long-form "law" but are entirely separate within it... That's about as pedantic as it can get, since the relevant thing here is that the rules are different for both.
I keep my keys in my pocket - not on a table somewhere. If I'm awake, they've probably been moving in the last few minutes.
Late 2012 was the first glued one.
It goes beyond color accuracy and resolution. A true depth of field range can't be achieved with a lens that small. They were using real depth of field to show what fake simulated depth of field would look like. See the article for yourself - they're doing a lot more than using it as a placeholder image on a phone screen. They're advertising it as the actual capability.
Only if you're an employee. In this case, you're just a really under-informed independent contractor bidding on losing propositions.
Yeah, same for those kids in overseas sweatshops. Who's to say that it's cruel and inhumane?
Limos don't follow taxi laws either. Calling it "ride sharing" doesn't help their case, but being a private hire vehicle not hailed from the street makes quite a bit of difference with the way most of the laws are written.
He makes about $50,000/year driving. The money left over paid part of his rent
So after expenses it doesn't even cover all of rent? I know rent is high in NYC but $50k only pays part of rent? Or are you confusing gross revenue with net profit (income)?
No, it's totally valid. Especially is it's a side job and you have a regular commute. You see that car depreciation and maintenance expense, but you can't quantify how it affects your bottom line very easily. In this case externalized means external to your business budget and perceived profit/loss.
They're almost there...
I can't tell if you're stupid or just willfully ignorant. The same hardware can either be efficient, cool, and quiet or just run faster and get a lot more performance at the cost of heat. In more recent CPUs, they do BOTH. No amount of efficiency gains would be wasted on keeping the CPU cooler unless the higher performance is never needed.
Yeah, they're barely surviving on the margins they have now, so they would be forced to raise prices rather than take slightly lower profit to keep their laptops at a marketable price point.
Battery replacements cost considerably less than $1200 and usually aren't needed until at least the third year.
Except for MS Surface
Or a beard / acne. Or if she's already pregnant (unlikely in this case, of course), a potential miscarriage.
create a full featured HTML5/WebKit compliant browser (which they should have done YEARS ago)
They're doing that right now.
ChromeOS is successful, but it still falls short of a good web-centric OS. Treating multiple open processes as simply "tabs" makes it really hard to get around. If specific web apps could get their own icon on the taskbar (and could still have subtabs), a Windows derivation has a good chance at being more usable. Task-switching is painful when everything is a tab in a monolithic window.
This is not the same thing as a notice for cancellation. In fact, it could make it worse compounded together. For example, if you only couldn't cancel in the middle of a billing cycle to not lose money, you could cancel the day after your next billing cycle starts and only have to pay for one month you don't want. If you combine that with 30 days notice in a calendar month with 30 days, you would have to pay for a whole second unwanted month because 30 days later would be into the following billing cycle.
It's not inaccurate. Cable/Satellite providers don't recompress an uncompressed feed. They get the OTA-ready MPEG-2 transport stream. They may not add much in the way of additional compression artifacts, but it's inevitable.
Rubbing it on your penis would carry the same problem, it could be tasted or otherwise detected.
No, the problem with this is that the testosterone absorbs transdermally - not just to you but to anyone in contact with the penis.