Your ultimate conclusion is that it's better for nobody to get what they want than to have the government step in. It's just not practical or realistic.
What is the government but the collective will of the people?
All TOS say that. You would be effectively banned from buying anything because ALL manufacturers do this. And since the "free market" is dumber than you are, they will sit idly by and allow it.
You are not a big enough customer base to ever effect change. Businesses do not do "the right thing" and there is no financial incentive to do so.
You can go ahead and keep trolling, but you're very clearly too idealistic to see the real world for what it is.
For task-based purposes, it's useful. Scheduling calendar events is much easier with voice control than by tapping (at least for me on Google Now). For sending a text while driving, your only choice is really voice control.
Sharp does have the Quattron panels with yellow subpixels. Can't say it makes a difference for all content, but I've definitely seen some impressive color in stores.
They've already bought it. You can't un-buy it once the maker reaches into your living room and changes your device. And no, you can't always know this in advance.
Says the marketing department, thanks to legal's insistence not to allow their trademark to be genericized. That's nothing to do with the fluidity of language and convenient shorthand.
First off, I was talking about marketing the class before you're enrolled. You don't really market a class much while people are in it.
Secondly, your scenario describes a cold meaningless request. If there were at least a social framing for why the date check is needed, that would be a start. I'm not sure how much is nature vs. nurture, but girls tend to relate better when they understand why the problem exists and needs solved and feel like it has some level of relevance. That's not to say this doesn't appeal to boys either. Those kind of changes would increase the appeal for both sexes.
HOSTS does not protect against DNS amplification attacks. It doesn't really matter what the victim is using for name resolution - they will still be the victim of the DDoS attack. That is, unless you're somehow downloading the entire Internet's DNS records and turning off DNS entirely. Which doesn't really factor into the bandwidth savings you mentioned.
Because taking a picture and posting it to a web site is actually a lot more technically complicated for a lot of people compared to using the FB app on their phones.
Then again, I would script their site to make their web site pull that data back onto their own web site. There's no reason a business should put more important information on FB than on their own web site.
Then the site developer can use Facebook's Graph API to pull the recent post back into the site's content, while the restaurant owner gets to benefit from Facebook's free mobile client to post the photos with.
Yes, even that is "using FB" but there comes a point that you just have to get over yourself.
Slashdot Mirror
Your ultimate conclusion is that it's better for nobody to get what they want than to have the government step in. It's just not practical or realistic.
What is the government but the collective will of the people?
And I'm suggesting you're wrong in their lack of substitution, as evidenced by the babies that were created.
Can't you at least check snopes before you start spouting off?
http://www.snopes.com/media/no...
Red Hat Enterprise? I think that's been done.
Who says they aren't substituting sex? Utah has the nation's largest average household size.
All TOS say that. You would be effectively banned from buying anything because ALL manufacturers do this. And since the "free market" is dumber than you are, they will sit idly by and allow it.
You are not a big enough customer base to ever effect change. Businesses do not do "the right thing" and there is no financial incentive to do so.
You can go ahead and keep trolling, but you're very clearly too idealistic to see the real world for what it is.
This happened post-purchase - including changes in the Terms & Conditions. You show me how you can read the future.
And if you can't afford to buy a new TV every time something like this happens, you as a consumer really are powerless.
For task-based purposes, it's useful. Scheduling calendar events is much easier with voice control than by tapping (at least for me on Google Now). For sending a text while driving, your only choice is really voice control.
And its parsing probably stopped at "Do you think" and hit the canned response.
Grain or blocking would have everything to do with the source input. Digital panels have neither inherently.
Sharp does have the Quattron panels with yellow subpixels. Can't say it makes a difference for all content, but I've definitely seen some impressive color in stores.
They've already bought it. You can't un-buy it once the maker reaches into your living room and changes your device. And no, you can't always know this in advance.
Sorry, PS3 already set the standard for removing features with no penalty. Remember "Other OS"?
Says the marketing department, thanks to legal's insistence not to allow their trademark to be genericized. That's nothing to do with the fluidity of language and convenient shorthand.
Technically, it's probably "LEGO® building blocks", where blocks is the plural. I like the shorthand better.
Rapid prototyping, faster than 3D printing.
First off, I was talking about marketing the class before you're enrolled. You don't really market a class much while people are in it.
Secondly, your scenario describes a cold meaningless request. If there were at least a social framing for why the date check is needed, that would be a start. I'm not sure how much is nature vs. nurture, but girls tend to relate better when they understand why the problem exists and needs solved and feel like it has some level of relevance. That's not to say this doesn't appeal to boys either. Those kind of changes would increase the appeal for both sexes.
boys don't like dolls
As long as you call them action figures, they do.
The real problem is that computer science classes tend to be set up to appeal to boys. What these classes really need is better marketing.
That would effectively raise the taxes primarily on low income citizens, who spend nearly 100% of their income.
But that's literally only to avoid having to try to support it. It's not like it doesn't work.
They just said that for custom codecs, SIMD is useful. There is nothing untrue about that.
HOSTS does not protect against DNS amplification attacks. It doesn't really matter what the victim is using for name resolution - they will still be the victim of the DDoS attack. That is, unless you're somehow downloading the entire Internet's DNS records and turning off DNS entirely. Which doesn't really factor into the bandwidth savings you mentioned.
Because taking a picture and posting it to a web site is actually a lot more technically complicated for a lot of people compared to using the FB app on their phones.
Then again, I would script their site to make their web site pull that data back onto their own web site. There's no reason a business should put more important information on FB than on their own web site.
Then the site developer can use Facebook's Graph API to pull the recent post back into the site's content, while the restaurant owner gets to benefit from Facebook's free mobile client to post the photos with.
Yes, even that is "using FB" but there comes a point that you just have to get over yourself.