Slashdot Mirror


Alcohol's Evaporating Health Benefits

New submitter Heart44 writes: A study in the British Medical Journal shows that consuming alcohol — any volume, any type — does not increase life expectancy. The full academic paper is not paywalled. From its conclusions: "Beneficial associations between low intensity alcohol consumption and all cause mortality may in part be attributable to inappropriate selection of a referent group and weak adjustment for confounders. Selection biases may also play a part." The associated editorial adds, "Firstly, in health as elsewhere, if something looks too good to be true, it should be treated with great caution. Secondly, health professionals should discourage suggestions that even low level alcohol use protects against cardiovascular disease and brings mortality benefits. Thirdly, health advice should come from health authorities, not from the alcohol industry, and, finally, the alcohol industry and its organizations should remove misleading references to health benefits from their information materials."

305 comments

  1. I love you man by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are the greatest, did you know than man. I mean I really Reealy love you. Now what was this article about. Oh. To your heath! cheers.
    Seriously, alchohol can creat fun opportunities to socialize and that's well known to be one of the singlemost important aspects of a healthy life. Or any life at all.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:I love you man by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It makes you wonder about this study. One would think that socializing, as promoted by moderate alcohol consumption would have a massive improvement on health and lifespan. If this study is not seeing that then either the assumption that happiness among freinds is a boon is wrong or that alcohol entirely offsets that. The third possibility, that they controlled for this, I'll dismiss. Finding people who socialized without alcohol would put this control group in rare company; they would biased comparables. I'm not saying one needs to drink so socialize. I know many people that don't and do. I just think the groups would not be comparable.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    2. Re:I love you man by pr100 · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure what you're saying.

      I'm not drinking alcohol at all this year (just as an experiment - I'm not a recovering alcoholic or anything like that). I don't think that this has made any difference to my socialising.

    3. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...The third possibility, that they controlled for this, I'll dismiss.

      From TFS:

      Beneficial associations between low intensity alcohol consumption and all cause mortality may in part be attributable to inappropriate selection of a referent group and weak adjustment for confounders

      Maybe someone needs to review a definition of the word confounder: "In statistics, a confounding variable (also confounding factor, a confound, or confounder) is an extraneous variable in a statistical model that correlates (directly or inversely) with both the dependent variable and the independent variable." (From wikipedia)

      In other words, alcohol is a confounding variable for the beneficial effects of socializing, and this study tries to correct reporting of this confounded relationship. So the possibility which you proudly dismissed is exactly what the study finding addresses. Congratulations.

    4. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, alchohol can creat fun opportunities to socialize

      So can living your life normally.

      and that's well known to be one of the singlemost important aspects of a healthy life. Or any life at all.

      That's a strange definition of "healthy" and "life." Not everyone wants to socialize as much as you. Some are fine barely socializing at all, yet are perfectly healthy, happy, and alive.

    5. Re:I love you man by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      I'm not drinking alcohol at all this year (just as an experiment - I'm not a recovering alcoholic or anything like that). I don't think that this has made any difference to my socialising.

      Yeah, but you've probably already established a (meatspace) social network prior to this.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    6. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 And some hate that all the conversations are lost due to alcohool and therefore don't like to socialize with drunken idiots.

    7. Re:I love you man by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure what you're saying.

      I'm not drinking alcohol at all this year (just as an experiment - I'm not a recovering alcoholic or anything like that). I don't think that this has made any difference to my socialising.

      "Getting drunk never helped me get laid, so maybe staying sober will".

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    8. Re:I love you man by cohomology · · Score: 3, Funny

      After a major health crisis, one doctor told me: "We don't cure people so they can live miserable lives without wine."

      --
      Don't mess with The Phone Company. Piss them off and you'll be using two tin cans and a piece of string.
    9. Re:I love you man by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Lez jush keep drinkin untilz a compeeting paper comez out nex year.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    10. Re:I love you man by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      No one is saying don't drink alcohol. They're saying don't drink alcohol to improve your health. Drink it in spite of what it may be doing to your health ;)

    11. Re:I love you man by goombah99 · · Score: 1, Troll

      Dude,
          your argument is this:
                  Alcohol use is associated with health benefits largely because alcohol users socialize more than non users. The alcohol itself has no positive health effect. We design a study to factor out the portion of alcohols positive correlation with health and assign it all to another variable--- socialization.

      My argument was. Stop after the first phase and put on your thinking cap: "Alcohol use is associated with health benefits...".

      Now ask yourself: As a holistic physician, would I recommend a public policy that promotes moderate drinking?

      Absolutely. We've had a gazillion years of society to to figure out other ways yet this way perpetuates it self. Sure there's religion, or Xbox or other ways to get this job done. In theory Muslims abstain so those societies have other ways. Sure. But Do they have better aggregate health outcomes than societies that do promote healthy drinking? That's the study you need to do.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    12. Re:I love you man by sycodon · · Score: 2

      It makes you wounder why we pay attention to any study. Seems like most studies usually have contradictory results and then are summarily reversed years later.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    13. Re:I love you man by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      So can living your life normally.

      What is this "normal life" you speak of?

      Seriously, define "normal life." If you can do that, you might be in line for a Nobel.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    14. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because getting women drunk is what gets you laid. It's not like men usually need to lower their inhibitions to sex.

      Men getting drunk only results in them acting like morons and more likely having limp dicks if they do, somehow, manage to get laid after being smashed.

    15. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Spoken like a true alcoholic.

      That's ridiculous and irresponsible. Alcohol had positive health benefits in the past that are no longer relevant in much of the world. For example, the beer that the Egyptians were drinking had a lot more nutritional content in it than modern brews do. There were antibiotics and a lot more yeast. In the UK they drank beer because the alcohol helped to sterilize it.

      These days most people have access to safe sources of water so that latter bit isn't relevant. And the former isn't relevant because we're not brewing it the same way that it was in the past.

      Alcohol is poision, there's really no argument about that, the questions are how much can you consume, what are the trade offs and is there any other aspect of it that improves ones health enough to make up for the fact that it's a toxic substance.

    16. Re:I love you man by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      Alcohol == Conversation Lubrication!!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    17. Re:I love you man by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      That's because getting women drunk is what gets you laid. It's not like men usually need to lower their inhibitions to sex.

      Yep, that's why I love the Mardi Gras season here in New Orleans SOOO much.

      It is like the worlds largest cocktail party...the women all already have a drink in their hands, and hell, if you're in the Quarter, you likely will get to see what their carrying under their sweaters if you offer them some nice long beads.

      It is the perfect time of the year to get laid!!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    18. Re:I love you man by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This type of thing sounds VERY similar to the folks that still posit that marijuana still has no health benefits.

      Folks, face it...pretty much ALL medicine or things with medicinal qualities are in some way poisonous to the system, depending on how you frame things.

      It seems the teetotalers and anti-any drug other than pure O2 from God's own air system, will say about anything to defend their position that anything that can intoxicate is BAD, and cannot possibly have a single good or beneficial 'side effect'.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    19. Re:I love you man by king+neckbeard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, men don't need their inhibitions lowered to consent to sex. But they may need their inhibitions lowered to approach and confidently speak with women to get a chance to have said sex in the first place, or to prevent them from overthinking and ruining things.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    20. Re:I love you man by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Modest alcohol use promotes social interaction so that geek DNA can be perpetuated, while the limp-dick problem filters out abusive users from the gene pool. Everybody wins.

    21. Re:I love you man by sycodon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everything in moderation...including moderation.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    22. Re:I love you man by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      I'm not drinking alcohol at all this year (just as an experiment - I'm not a recovering alcoholic or anything like that).

      Me too, though for different reasons. I ran out a few years ago and have been too lazy to go to the liquor store (the ABC store here in VA) to get some more. I do like beer, but don't often drink it because, I think, the Hops gives me a headache -- I have an allergy to pine needles.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    23. Re: I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My boss is a fat fuck, so I chose G.

    24. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, if you're liver's doing the processing your body's treating it like a poison. High Fructose Corn Syrup, for example.

    25. Re:I love you man by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      It makes you wounder why we pay attention to any study. Seems like most studies usually have contradictory results and then are summarily reversed years later.

      Typically the early studies are observational. They find a correlation. Scientifically that should be a starting point, but instead people jump to a conclusion.

    26. Re:I love you man by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      For many drinking MODERATE amounts of alcohol can ease tension and increase confidence (or conversely make you less self-conscience) which usually leads you to do things you wouldn't normally do. Whether this behavior is a blessing or a curse is dependent on the behavior and the circumstance but it will most likely lead to a different outcome than had you not been drinking. So your experiment would be more accurate if you clone yourself and have one of yourselves drinking and the other sober in the same situation.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    27. Re:I love you man by tburkhol · · Score: 1

      As a holistic physician, would I recommend a public policy that promotes moderate drinking?

      If you think that the reduction in all-cause mortality associated with moderate alcohol consumption is because drinkers go out and socialize, then you should be encouraging the stay-at-home non-drinkers to go out and socialize, not to stay at home and get drunk alone.

    28. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the exact reason why I don't drink (and I do like beer).

    29. Re:I love you man by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 2

      No, there's a new paper and THAT'S THE LAST WORD. Everyone update their recommendations and reprint their pamphlets, immediately! I think this is what Scott Adams was ranting about a few weeks ago. You're right, though, and one other thing that alcohol does even if drinking alone is to relax you, lift your spirits and get your mind off whatever stressful events actually are draining your life force. I appreciate people doing all this research, but they need to show a little humility. Hard work doesn't mean you're right.

      --
      Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
    30. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article seemed very sensationalist. It conflates moderate(1-2 beers/day) alcohol consumption with people dying from alcohol abuse.

    31. Re:I love you man by ewibble · · Score: 2

      While the study normalized for socialization, which may favor saying alcohol is bad, studies that say people who drink a moderate amount is good for you have removed people who drink excessively. Having a society that encourages moderate drinking will probably increase the amount of heavy drinkers.

      Also maybe people who don't drink don't like to socialize as much because they don't like hanging out with a bunch of drunks. Most social gatherings are based on alcohol consumption. If we had more events that where more than just drinking and talking shit, perhaps non-drinkers may socialize more.

    32. Re:I love you man by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      The herd/fad/trend mindset. You've got the huge crowds that follow Dr. Oz, Dr. Phil, etc.. Look at the yo-yo'ing that studies on coffee/caffeine do. I stopped listening to all these random flip flopping studies. Just common sense and moderation are pretty good guides to healthy living, too much of anything is bound to be bad.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    33. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the greatest, did you know than man. I mean I really Reealy love you. Now what was this article about. Oh. To your heath! cheers.
      Seriously, alchohol can creat fun opportunities to socialize and that's well known to be one of the singlemost important aspects of a healthy life. Or any life at all.

      Looking over the history of alcohol and society, I would have to say that alcohol has brought more problems into society than has created social benefits.

      Case in point. You just stated that alcohol can create fun opportunities. Another way of stating that is alcohol is needed to create fun opportunities. Another way of saying that is alcohol is needed to create opportunities of any kind.

      Of course, I've just described the different levels of alcohol addiction, something that happens to humans every three seconds in the world, but hey, why focus on the negative, right?

      Drink up buddy. Your insurers are counting on it.

    34. Re:I love you man by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      The socializing isn't a property of the alcohol. Sure, in a society where everyone drinks alcohol and you are seen as an outcast and weird if you don't drink alcohol, then not drinking means less socialization and less happiness, possibly less lifespan. But if you ask me, the blame for that should be placed on the culture, not the people who refuse to conform to it.

      But yes, as Ben Goldacre pointed out long ago, in the UK at least most people drink, and those who don't are probably different in lots of other ways that potentially affect health. That was always one reason to be suspicious of the health benefit claims.

      There were others. The argument for health benefits of moderate alcohol consumption was always based on the weakest forms of EBM with blinders on: no randomized controlled trials, and rarely any theories about what would cause the mysterious health benefits at low levels. All which were presented were either discredited, e.g. antioxidants in red wine - or not really a very good reason to recommend drinking when you come down to it (the social benefits you mention).

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    35. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because getting women drunk is what gets you laid. It's not like men usually need to lower their inhibitions to sex.

      Yep, that's why I love the Mardi Gras season here in New Orleans SOOO much.

      It is like the worlds largest cocktail party...the women all already have a drink in their hands, and hell, if you're in the Quarter, you likely will get to see what their carrying under their sweaters if you offer them some nice long beads.

      It is the perfect time of the year to get laid!!!

      Alcohol and beads. Clearly all you need to attract those of a certain intelligence level and convince them to do just about anything.

      Happy hunting, moron.

    36. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asprin is poison but my cardiologist tells me to take one everyday. Life is fatal, enjoy yourself "a little."

    37. Re:I love you man by Vintermann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Something rather important is that all or virtually all of that effect is in your socialization and expectations around alcohol, not the alcohol itself. There are plenty of classic studies showing that people who believe they consume alcohol, behave as if they really did - and conversely, that alcohol does very little to your inhibitions unless you figure out that's what they're feeding you.

      So no, it doesn't really make you do things you normally wouldn't do. It just gives you an excuse - one your surroundings believe in, and one you probably believe in yourself.

      If we didn't have alcohol, I bet that either we would find something else and ascribe inhibition-reducing properties to it, or we would act slightly less inhibited all week instead of just concentrated to friday night.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    38. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Dude if you are liver is doing ..."

      Sit down and shut the fuck up you illiterate retard.

    39. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe someone needs to review the definition of "independent variable," which in this case would be alcohol.

    40. Re:I love you man by spitzak · · Score: 1

      I think that is exactly the sort of thing they are talking about when it says previous studies had "weak adjustment for confounders".

    41. Re:I love you man by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Since alcohol tolerance was essential to the dominance of our ancestors, then it follows that our society would not exist without alcohol. It was also essential to making it through certain periods of history.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    42. Re:I love you man by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      The big 30-year study on medical doctors that showed the reduced rate of death for some levels of alcohol consumption didn't show an improvement at "1-2/day" which is actually a substantial quantity. What it showed was a reduced death rate at 4/week, compared to 0. And at 7/week the death rate was equal to 0. And at 14/week (2/day!) the death rate had already gone up substantially.

      One thing I've noticed is that people who want to believe the early study often also want the results to be different than they are; they want to remember that "moderate drinking" is good, and then use the most permissive definition of "moderate" that they can, and then their brain will forget that the study basically said daily drinking is unhealthy.

      The fact is the level of drinking that was shown to be healthy is not enough to be socially or recreationally useful. And it doesn't support the "daily large beer that is actually 2 `servings'" either, or even the "glass (or two) of wine with dinner" model.

      As to this study, I'll have to wait to find out if it is even worth reading. The linked article gave no facts at all that are useful, and gives the strong impression that the study is designed to refute the media-presented "moderate is good, daily use is moderation" myth. But they don't do any better, and define "moderate" for the reader.

    43. Re:I love you man by Tyger · · Score: 1

      Pure O2? Have you never heard of oxygen toxicity?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen_toxicity

    44. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This type of thing sounds VERY similar to the folks that still posit that marijuana still has no health benefits.

      FACT: Alcohol is a poison to the human body. One can fatally overdose from consumption, and it has killed millions in human history.

      FACT: The cannabis plant, consumed in any form, is not harmful to the human body. In thousands of years, not a single fatality has been directly associated with its use. Its physically impossible to overdose from consuming it.

      Similar? No, more like BIG FUCKING DIFFERENCE.

    45. Re:I love you man by BellyJelly · · Score: 1

      In the UK they drank beer because the alcohol helped to sterilize it.

      Actually, the water used was boiled during the beer making process and that's what sterilized it. The alcohol probably helped keep it that way.

    46. Re:I love you man by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      I'm not drinking alcohol at all this year (just as an experiment - I'm not a recovering alcoholic or anything like that).

      Me too, though for different reasons. I ran out a few years ago and have been too lazy to go to the liquor store (the ABC store here in VA) to get some more. I do like beer, but don't often drink it because, I think, the Hops gives me a headache -- I have an allergy to pine needles.

      As a major hop-head, you have my deepest sympathies, sir. I typically enjoy beers in the 70 - 120 IBUs range. If I had to stick to low (or non-) hopped beer I would certainly quit drinking it. In fact, I did for many years in the mid-to-late 1980's, before I discovered craft beer.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    47. Re:I love you man by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Antioxidants aren't to "blame" because the best study showing a reduced death rate at 4 drinks/wk showed the same rate regardless of type of alcohol used, and most don't have high antioxidant levels. Even most wines don't. Also, increased antioxidants are only proven to have a health benefit in people with unnaturally low levels; people who eat processed food and few fresh, unpeeled fruits and vegetables will have increased health from eating antioxidants. Absolutely. People who eat fresh fruit and vegetables, with skins, on a daily basis and in variety are not show to benefit from increased antioxidants, and in this group almost all nutrient supplementation appears to actually be harmful.

      I'm surprised you jump to the conclusion that there is no theory of benefit. The studies that show reduced death from specific causes are very, very strong studied; there are absolutely people with an increased risk of heart attack who will benefit from light drinking. The catch, of course, is that stroke risk goes up, along with other risks. The problem is that in a healthy person with normal risk of heart attack and stroke, the studies conflict on if the effect balances out, or one is stronger. So the "no theory to why" concept is a real dud, because the studies are already knee deep in conflicting known whys.

      And the flip side, a person with increased stroke risk should probably not touch any alcohol at all, even in moderation. And of course heavy drinking increases heart disease, so unless a person has well-proven self control there is a major question of if self-dosing is effective enough to recommend even the useful level to somebody with heart risk, since over-indulging will actually make it worse. And, socially the concept of "over-indulging" is probably 10x the amount where it stopped being beneficial, so you can't rely on friends and family members to be much help. Even if you gave them the studies, they still keep recommending either "none" or "way more than is beneficial," for example the common recommendation even on slashdot from people who claim to have read up on the subject is "1-2/day," clearly a high level of consumption based on the actual levels that showed benefits. It is undoubted that at 2/day you've increased your stroke risk more than any possible reduction in heart attack rate.

    48. Re:I love you man by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Something rather important is that all or virtually all of that effect is in your socialization and expectations around alcohol, not the alcohol itself. There are plenty of classic studies showing that people who believe they consume alcohol, behave as if they really did - and conversely, that alcohol does very little to your inhibitions unless you figure out that's what they're feeding you.

      Those studies show less about the effects of alcohol and more about the way our physiology works. It's a placebo effect based on a conditioned response. It also works on people with severe long-term pain. After treating it with morphine successfully, an injection of saline because just as effective as actual morphine. Plenty of studies on that, too.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    49. Re:I love you man by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      In Buddhism they teach moderation. Instead of starving yourself all day, or performing rituals all day, monks starve themselves half the day, eat lightly the other half, and mix in rituals all day. (they only eat from sunrise until noon)

      They do moderate their moderation, they have annual 10 day festivals where they don't moderate, they just starve themselves the whole 10 days.

    50. Re:I love you man by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      This type of thing sounds VERY similar to the folks that still posit that marijuana still has no health benefits.

      FACT: Alcohol is a poison to the human body. One can fatally overdose from consumption, and it has killed millions in human history.

      FACT: The cannabis plant, consumed in any form, is not harmful to the human body. In thousands of years, not a single fatality has been directly associated with its use. Its physically impossible to overdose from consuming it.

      Similar? No, more like BIG FUCKING DIFFERENCE.

      Well, I think you're conflating toxicity to mortality.

      Pot may not kill you, but I do believe there are studies showing that prolonged, continuous usage (i.e. abuse) can lead to some memory problems and possibly neuron damage in the brain?

      So, I stand by what I said, most all medicines ARE somewhat poisonous, just depends on how much you do and how toxic they are in those amounts.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    51. Re:I love you man by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Looking over the history of alcohol and society, I would have to say that alcohol has brought more problems into society than has created social benefits.

      Not true. Even if you dismiss the credibility of studies showing how beer and wine making promoted the formation of agrarian societies, it's clear that long ocean voyages would have been impossible without mead - it was the only way to store potable fluids for long periods.

      You could even go so far as to say it was alcohol that created modern society. Now, you can claim we would all be better off if society had never progressed beyond hunter-gatherer lifestyles, but that's a pretty pessimistic viewpoint.

      alcohol addiction, something that happens to humans every three seconds in the world

      Quite impossible. Alcohol addiction is not something that happens over and over - once you're addicted, it's for life. Just go to any AA meeting and ask. There are only 6.9 new people every three seconds. By your reckoning, that means that 43% of the global population are alcoholics. I feel like that's a bit inflated.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    52. Re:I love you man by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Alcohol may or may not have brought more problems into society than it solved, but if you're looking for harms, I'd put Prohibition right at the top. You can't have the deaths and other evils of Prohibition without whatever you're prohibiting.

      Beware of alcohol, it increases the rate of harmful Prohibition!

    53. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are scientists. If they were good at socializing they would be something else.

    54. Re:I love you man by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      So no, it doesn't really make you do things you normally wouldn't do. It just gives you an excuse - one your surroundings believe in, and one you probably believe in yourself.

      Overstated.

      It can indeed make you do things you would not normally do, by effecting your judgement. In turn by depressing parts of the brain that control higher-order function.

      Whether it helps socialization may be disputed, but lapses of judgment during overuse is a pretty solidly established, objective fact.

    55. Re:I love you man by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In the UK they drank beer because the alcohol helped to sterilize it.

      No, they didn't. Beer (even real beer, still generally no more than about 12% alcohol) doesn't have enough alcohol in it to "sterilize" much of anything. Beer was safer because it had been brewed (i.e. boiled), and afterward the yeast helped to keep out harmful microbes.

      So... close, but not quite.

      There was no concept of microbial disease back then. So they didn't really know why beer didn't make them sick but the water did. They just noticed it and took advantage of it.

    56. Re:I love you man by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Alcohol is poision, there's really no argument about that, the questions are how much can you consume, what are the trade offs and is there any other aspect of it that improves ones health enough to make up for the fact that it's a toxic substance.

      Drinking too much water will kill you. Yes, really.

      Oxygen is poisonous as hell at too high of a concentration.

      Yet you'll die if you go without either one for any length of time.

      In almost all cases, "poison" is a relative concept. Absolute statements like "any amount are poisonous" is pretty meaningless.

    57. Re:I love you man by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Too simple.

      There are lots of possible health effects, including temporary reduction of stress. Even if that's a purely psychological effect directly, it can have serious physiological effects in the long term.

      I am skeptical of this study. Too many other papers have reported health benefits of moderate drinking, and not all of them were sponsored or promoted by "industry". I do not dispute that special interests may have promoted many of them afterward, but when so much research on one "side" of the question comes to one conclusion, and the conclusion of a single report is 180 degrees opposed, I think there is a lot of valid questioning to be done.

    58. Re:I love you man by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Insightful

      +1 And some hate that all the conversations are lost due to alcohool and therefore don't like to socialize with drunken idiots.

      Not everybody who is drunk is an idiot.

      Would you call Winston Churchill an idiot? Or Isaac Asimov, or Richard Feynman? They were all notorious drinkers. (In fact Churchill was said to finish at least a fifth of whiskey a day.)

    59. Re:I love you man by umghhh · · Score: 1

      It may be that alcohol helps in surviving a party with all those people around, that either are too intellectual for their own good or are to silly to allow meaningful discussion. I have a comparison because I had to give up drinking some time ago due to health concerns.I did not have problems without a drink. I had a problem without a drink during parties. I found solution - I do not go to the parties anymore. I have more time and save money too - win,win!
      I miss a glass of good wine and/or beer tho. The taste of it especially red wine - I liked it as it made the taste of my meals complete.

    60. Re:I love you man by umghhh · · Score: 1

      but that is not how some understood it. Alco is no help - evil then!
      BTW: I know the dark side of alco as I lost a friend and a member of a family to alcohol (or to late effects of misuse). But you can overindulge in almost anything. Humans are very inventive at that.

    61. Re:I love you man by Rakarra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      FACT: Alcohol is a poison to the human body. One can fatally overdose from consumption, and it has killed millions in human history.

      You know, you can make the same claim about water. You can easily overdose, it's killed millions, etcetc.

      Your body is a balancing act. The ingestion of any substance beyond your body's ability to process it will cause long-term harm, etcetcetc.

    62. Re:I love you man by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      There was a study done in UK in the 90s where they gathered information from people before death. The information separated death resulting from cardiovascular issues to other reasons of natural death. The result of the study was that 1 drink per day resulted in the lowest rate of death (even better than none). This is also why it was said that one drink a day was fine. Doctors today still use this 1 drink a day as a guideline when patients ask. Some studies suggested the best drink to have daily was a glass of red wine.

      What the original study didn't keep track of is what other health issues these drinkers had to cope with. Those who know of an older life time heavy drinker know that their biggest health complications are usually kidney and liver related. In addition to this, alcohol has a temporary effect on blood pressure as it makes the blood vessels stiffer and this can be dangerous to those with high blood pressure issues.

      FYI, I was drunk as hell when I wrote this!!

      I'm a fan of the alcohol and

    63. Re:I love you man by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Alcohol + Conversation = Lubrication

      It's commutative!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    64. Re:I love you man by Nemesisghost · · Score: 1

      As a non-drinking Mormon I can say that the population I belong to is as a whole more healthy than the rest of the population. At one point we had a 10-20% longer life span. We generally have a much lower level of the most common health issues. But you are talking about a highly socializing & very health conscious group of people who abstain from drugs, alcohol, tobacco, tea & coffee.

    65. Re:I love you man by dj245 · · Score: 1

      This type of thing sounds VERY similar to the folks that still posit that marijuana still has no health benefits.

      FACT: Alcohol is a poison to the human body. One can fatally overdose from consumption, and it has killed millions in human history.

      FACT: The cannabis plant, consumed in any form, is not harmful to the human body. In thousands of years, not a single fatality has been directly associated with its use. Its physically impossible to overdose from consuming it.

      Similar? No, more like BIG FUCKING DIFFERENCE.

      Well, I think you're conflating toxicity to mortality.

      Pot may not kill you, but I do believe there are studies showing that prolonged, continuous usage (i.e. abuse) can lead to some memory problems and possibly neuron damage in the brain?

      So, I stand by what I said, most all medicines ARE somewhat poisonous, just depends on how much you do and how toxic they are in those amounts.

      Yes, but is that the cannabis itself, or the benzene, toluene and naphthalene that you get when you smoke it? Maybe vaporizing or eating brownies is harmless?

      The problem is we don't know- as far as I know there are no scientific studies on long-term side effects looking at the different modes of consumption. There is a tremendous amount of research that hasn't been done yet due to reasons of the drug's unreasonable legal status. And the research that has been done probably doesn't include a full representation of the population. Just as an example, anyone with a job that gets drug tested frequently probably wouldn't even sign up for a scientific study- they might be seen by someone and lose their job. That tilts the study samples towards people on the lower rungs of society.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    66. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and here I thought it would just seem longer

    67. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Done. The two groups with the longest lives are Mormons and Sevemth Day Adventists. What do they have in common? No alcohol, and no smoking. As the live appreciably longer than non smokers who drink, case proven.

    68. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it or not, it's possible to socialize without the aid of alcohol or other narcotics. To say that alcohol "promotes" these things says a lot about your cultural biases, but in medical terms it's either meaningless or false.

    69. Re:I love you man by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, alchohol can creat fun opportunities to socialize and that's well known to be one of the singlemost important aspects of a healthy life. Or any life at all.

      You can get this with many other drugs. MDMA would probably be more effective in this regard, and I've rarely seen studies saying that ecstasy is good for you at any dose.
      Alcohol as a social lubricant is a cultural thing. The substance itself is nothing special.

    70. Re:I love you man by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      Asprin is poison but my cardiologist tells me to take one everyday. Life is fatal, enjoy yourself "a little."

      That's because your cardiologist owns shares in pharmaceutical companies.

    71. Re:I love you man by sjames · · Score: 1

      I skimmed through the paper and I doubt it will amount to much. None of the results were terribly strong statistically. It read a bit like massaging the analysis until the effect goes away (but it didn't).

      So, moderate consumption still good, superhuman consumption still won't make you immortal (quite the opposite).

    72. Re:I love you man by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      I'm not drinking alcohol at all this year (just as an experiment - I'm not a recovering alcoholic or anything like that).

      Me too, though for different reasons. I ran out a few years ago and have been too lazy to go to the liquor store (the ABC store here in VA) to get some more. I do like beer, but don't often drink it because, I think, the Hops gives me a headache -- I have an allergy to pine needles.

      Yesterday I got out of an annoying parents meeting at my child's school, rushed to the liquor store and found it had closed 30 minutes before the meeting ended. I've been without a G&T ever since. HELP!

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    73. Re:I love you man by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      You are the greatest

      That's what I said to the bottle of Archery Summit 2012 Premier Cuvée I finished off a couple of days ago.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    74. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As per the article, I've been drinking for my health. Obviously there's a flaw in there somewhere.

    75. Re:I love you man by Accordion+Noir · · Score: 1

      If they're shilling for a pharmaceutical company, why are they pushing aspirin, which went out of patent in 1917?

      Had to look that up – interesting stuff; German-spy conspiracies and everything! Who knew Edison's record factories competed for raw-materials with pain-releaver production? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...

      --
      "Ruthlessly pursuing the idea that the accordion is just another instrument."
    76. Re:I love you man by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Alcohol had positive health benefits in the past that are no longer relevant in much of the world.

      I'm fairly certain alcohol is still the most successful fertility-enhancing drug.*

      *Effect may be limited to those who do not want children.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    77. Re:I love you man by pepty · · Score: 1

      Dude, if your liver is doing the processing than your body is treating it like something that needs to be hydroxylated for further metabolism or excretion.

    78. Re:I love you man by pepty · · Score: 1

      The small studies tend to be the ones that flip flop - and they garner a lot of attention. The ones that are adequately powered and well controlled are a lot rarer (because they tend to take a decade to run and be hideously expensive), so they don't end up in the news very often.

    79. Re:I love you man by MichaelMacDonald · · Score: 1

      More than possible. I mean, I can accept that there might be no health benefits to the occasional glass of wine. There are happiness benefits... I enjoy the occasional drink or two. It doesn't negatively affect my health. To be honest? If it did? I would have to weigh exactly how much, because what is the point of living an extra 10 years if those extra 10 years are miserable? Not to mention that I doubt that drinking or not drinking will make a solid impact on your lifespan one way or the other, when not combined with other actions.

    80. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree with your point, no, millions haven't overdosed on water. Drowning is not the same.

    81. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asimov? ASIMOV?? The lifelong teetotaller? Yes, he hung out in bars, but no he didn't drink. Not at least according to pretty much everything everyone's ever written about him.

      That, sir, is fiction. Asimov was not ever a 'notorious drinker'.

      AC

    82. Re:I love you man by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Yes, conditioned response is a factor too, but still that's a conditioned response based on social conditioning, not the biochemical properties of alcohol. Here, anthropological studies are useful to take a look at. Alcohol does not universally reduce inhibitions. In some cultures, they even split up the beliefs about alcohol, so that e.g. liquor from the city makes you aggressive, boisterous and disinhibited, but traditional fermented beverages just makes you calm and mellow.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    83. Re:I love you man by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      "Judgment" is a weasel word here. In one sense what you say is true, but not if you read that word like most people read it.

      It impairs judgment in the sense that it slows your thinking. A slow brain still comes to the same conclusions as a fast brain most of the time - it just takes a little longer.

      If it is the sort of judgment that improves with more time thinking about it, then alcohol impairs judgment. But e.g. whether it's a good idea to go for a nighttime swim in the canal, or whether it's a good idea to hit on your boss' wife, are not especially time-dependent judgments. If alcohol makes you do stuff like that, it's social conditioning at work, not brain impairment.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    84. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am given to understand there is evidence to support cannabis having some medicinal uses, such as the alleviation of chronic pain due to nerve damage. But what medical use is there for the consumption of alcohol?

    85. Re: I love you man by pr100 · · Score: 1

      You might think that, but I've been married for 23 years. That's not the situation...

    86. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes Bro, hydroxylation is an important part of detoxification. As in "this is poison, let's get it!"

    87. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get it out, that is. I gotta quit drinking.

    88. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that Feynman stopped when he noticed it was getting out of control.

    89. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm one of those people who drinks very very rarely, and never has drunk at a social gathering, or entered a bar, really. It's been years since my last drop. I've never been drunk in my life -- the most alcohol I've consumed at a time is perhaps two glassfuls of wine. So you can perhaps say that I've no (social) preconceptions about alcohol.

      Yet I do feel quite a bit more cheerful, a bit more relaxed, after a glass. I guess you could call the feeling 'less inhibited'.

      I would certainly say that alcohol has these properties, and that they are not a placebo. (And that I really should drink more, but that's another issue.)

    90. Re:I love you man by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Yes, men don't need their inhibitions lowered to consent to sex.

      You have obviously never experienced the Beer Goggle effect.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    91. Re:I love you man by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      There's actually some math to the beer goggle effect, and the beer itself usually isn't the biggest factor. I would say that much of what is attributed to the 'Beer Goggle effect' is really just using booze as a cover for having low standards as opposed to actually having inhibitions.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    92. Re:I love you man by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      It's a balance however, there is that narrow band of where if you go beyond it, your "effectiveness" may start to diminish...

    93. Re:I love you man by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      There's actually some math to the beer goggle effect, and the beer itself usually isn't the biggest factor. I would say that much of what is attributed to the 'Beer Goggle effect' is really just using booze as a cover for having low standards as opposed to actually having inhibitions.

      Going to have to disagree :-)

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    94. Re:I love you man by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      You can die from drinking (not breathing) too much water. It is called hyponatremia and can lead to "water intoxication", and it can kill you in extreme cases.

      There was an example a few years ago where a radio station had a contest among a few contestants on who could drink the most water, and the winner would get an Xbox I believe. A woman died as a result.

      Anyway, it wouldn't be millions however, and Alcohol is certainly more dangerous. Anyway they don't call it in"toxic"ation for nothing...

    95. Re:I love you man by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1
      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    96. Re:I love you man by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      You're not really contradicting me here. I'm not saying that beer goggles don't exist. I'm saying that their effects are usually greatly exaggerated, and that the IDEA of beer goggles is often used as an excuse to avoid social judgment for actions that would draw criticism. In common parlance, beer goggles appear to, in practice, be mostly an excuse to go home with a 'moped.'

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    97. Re:I love you man by camazotz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it is entirely possible to socialize without drinking. In fact, one could argue that alcohol has the opposite effect. Try socializing with some excessive drinkers sometime (and play the teetotaler or designated driver). Excruciating experience, and if you're lucky one of them won't vomit up a lung before the night is over.

    98. Re:I love you man by camazotz · · Score: 1

      I'm not drinking alcohol at all this year (just as an experiment - I'm not a recovering alcoholic or anything like that). I don't think that this has made any difference to my socialising.

      Yeah, but you've probably already established a (meatspace) social network prior to this.

      Surely you don't think you need to drink to establish a meatspace social network.

    99. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw a bio of Richard Feynman. He said he never drank because he didn't want to mess with the brain, which is amazingly complex.

    100. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's because the mild poison of alcohol killed of germs, so alcoholical drinks where the only ones that you could be reasonably sure wheren't gonna land you with an infection

      We now live in a society (at least in the Western world) where potable water is not hard to come by

    101. Re: I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who only drinks on Friday nights? What gets you through Monday if booze isn't waiting for you? Don't comment things you don't understand.

    102. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were the people you socialize with drinking even though you didn't? Then they probably didn't care that you weren't drinking.

      Get everyone to not drink and then see how the socializing goes. ;-)

    103. Re:I love you man by antdude · · Score: 1

      So, dumb/stupid/retarded people get laid more?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    104. Re:I love you man by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

      A more accurate description might be that you are more likely to get laid if you are within a standard deviation of intelligence from your target audience.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    105. Re:I love you man by doccus · · Score: 1

      It's not just the alcohol. It's the Pubs. The lowering of inhibitions. The wine associations and brewer's organizations, In fact, all the things that are known to extend life expectancy. for just sttart

  2. Brittish Medical Journal, HA! by unixcorn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Consuming alcohol certainly does improve life expectancy. Drinking is the only thing keeping me from killing someone almost every day!

    1. Re:Brittish Medical Journal, HA! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      It definitely improves my expectancy*. Until the next morning, anyway.

      ex pect an cy
      noun the state of thinking or hoping that something, especially something pleasant, will happen or be the case.

    2. Re:Brittish Medical Journal, HA! by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      Here in Texas that would count double, given the death penalty and all. I wonder if they made a "strong adjustment for psychological remediation" or even "capital punishment prevention", seems like they missed a few confounders in there.

    3. Re:Brittish Medical Journal, HA! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      "Drinking is the only thing keeping me from killing someone almost every day!"

      For proof, look at the death rate in that one part of the world where for religious reasons nobody drinks and where they can't substitute sex, as in Utah.

    4. Re:Brittish Medical Journal, HA! by omnichad · · Score: 0

      Who says they aren't substituting sex? Utah has the nation's largest average household size.

    5. Re:Brittish Medical Journal, HA! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Fun fact: Utah is not a religious nation, but a secular US State.
      Fun fact: Only 41% of people in Utah are active Mormons.

      Another Fun Fact: Utah is one of 18 "control states" where the State acts as the distributor and sells all the alcohol to the stores. So far from being a place without alcohol, it is actually a State where the government is directly involved in promoting and enabling alcohol consumption.

      I've heard a lot of funny myths about Mormons, but being against sex isn't usually one. I wonder how that "multiple wives" stuff they used to (*) do ever got started if they're against sex?

    6. Re:Brittish Medical Journal, HA! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Who says Slashdotters can read posts now? I was referring to a teetotaling part of the world which DOESN'T substitute sex for drinking, and is therefore riddled with violence.

    7. Re:Brittish Medical Journal, HA! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And I'm suggesting you're wrong in their lack of substitution, as evidenced by the babies that were created.

    8. Re:Brittish Medical Journal, HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he's talking about somewhere other than Utah, you insensitive clod!

  3. The health benefit of alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    is that it helps gets you laid, which is obviously very healthy both as exercise and for your confidence and mental state. Unless you're an idiot and get an std or get pregnant.

    1. Re:The health benefit of alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      is that it helps gets you laid, which is obviously very healthy both as exercise and for your confidence and mental state. Unless you're an idiot and get an std or get pregnant.

      If you need alcohol to get laid (especially if that means "get her drunk so she'll let you bang her"), you're pathetic.

    2. Re:The health benefit of alcohol by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Alcohol makes me drunk and, despite increased amorous feelings, incapable of getting an erection.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    3. Re: The health benefit of alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if both the man and the woman are drunk? Do they rape each other?

      And I don't even see how it's automatically rape. If someone is passed out and can't consent in any form, sure. But everyone makes bad, short-sighted decisions, and especially when drunk, but that doesn't make it automatically rape. And at what blood alcohol level can someone not be able to consent? If what you want is long-term thinking, most people aren't able to do that even when sober.

      Furthermore, something can be both rape and sex at the same time.

    4. Re: The health benefit of alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Because women are objects with no agency. Her choosing to get drunk is meaningless. Next you will tell me regret after sex means the initial act was rape too or perhaps she is not responsible for driving drunk because she didn't consent to driving.
      I will give you black out drunk == no consent
        girl had a few drinks and is drunk == no consent is bullshit.

    5. Re:The health benefit of alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      is that it helps gets you laid, which is obviously very healthy both as exercise and for your confidence and mental state. Unless you're an idiot and get an std or get pregnant.

      If you need alcohol to get laid (especially if that means "get her drunk so she'll let you bang her"), you're pathetic.

      Oh look! The Social Justice Warriors are here! Thank goodness!

      Sharing a bottle of red wine with my GF leads to passionate, fun, sex. Not having wine with dinner, leads to less sex.

      Maybe if you were a bit less of a beta twerp, you'd get to a point where a little booze gets both of you what you want.

    6. Re:The health benefit of alcohol by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      He didn't say that he needs it, he said that it helps.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    7. Re: The health benefit of alcohol by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Nope. If incapacitated, yes. Not at all the same thing. If you insist it is, then you have to agree that the man who was also drunk during that encounter was raped as well.

    8. Re: The health benefit of alcohol by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      Hey anonymous coward, I ordered my latte 10 minutes ago. Get back to work and stop making moronic posts on slashdot.

    9. Re: The health benefit of alcohol by rogoshen1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So if she drives a car, and is pulled over -- what then? Is she similarly not responsible for her actions? Or does alcohol's ability to invalidate someone's decision making ability only apply to sex?

    10. Re:The health benefit of alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the medical term is whiskey dick.

    11. Re:The health benefit of alcohol by blackomegax · · Score: 1

      Hey now being pregnant will ramp your immune system into overdrive. Ipso facto alcohol can cure cancer.

    12. Re: The health benefit of alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have things backwards.

      You misunderstand things, if you're drunk, and she's ugly.

    13. Re: The health benefit of alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hey now. Lets not forget. We should always trust the woman who accuses the man of rape. We should not investigate it or judge the facts on their own merit. We should listen and trust the woman making the accusation because cis white men and patriarchy!

    14. Re: The health benefit of alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have fun explaining that to the feminazis. The woman could be bouncing up and down on your rock hard cock, but then all of a sudden she thinks about her ex and feels sad or has a stomachache or whatever and tells you to stop. Now you're a rapist, and as an accused rapist, it's guilty until proven innocent and your life is ruined.

    15. Re: The health benefit of alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because there's a parasite growing in the body

    16. Re:The health benefit of alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is that it helps gets you laid, which is obviously very healthy both as exercise and for your confidence and mental state. Unless you're an idiot and get an std or get pregnant.

      If you need alcohol to get laid (especially if that means "get her drunk so she'll let you bang her"), you're pathetic.

      Oh look! The Social Justice Warriors are here! Thank goodness!

      Sharing a bottle of red wine with my GF leads to passionate, fun, sex. Not having wine with dinner, leads to less sex.

      Maybe if you were a bit less of a beta twerp, you'd get to a point where a little booze gets both of you what you want.

      Why is it that no wine with dinner leads to less sex?

      Pretty fucking sad when you twerps aren't attracted enough to each other to have sex unless alcohol is involved.

    17. Re: The health benefit of alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have fun explaining that to the feminazis.

      That's kind of a strawman argument, as according to them PIV is always rape

    18. Re: The health benefit of alcohol by umghhh · · Score: 1

      but but but all men are rapists! It is OT for this discussion but it seems to me that in some societies on this beautiful planet, a man approaching a woman must be in a company of a lawyer and a witness just in case things will be investigated. I think making sex between humans illegal, when at least one party does not have a witness and a lawyer at his/her side, is not far away.

    19. Re: The health benefit of alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah car analogies. They're so tempting and easy to obliquely use on any argument, aren't they?

      If she was coerced or tricked into driving drunk then yeah, she might not be legally responsible for her actions: http://dui.findlaw.com/dui-cas...

      The real problem that both you and the other AC are tuning out is that instances where men are maliciously coercing or tricking women into having sex with them when they KNOW she wouldn't while sober, are ludicrously more common than instances where women maliciously ruined a guy's life with false rape accusations when he genuinely thought it was consensual.

    20. Re: The health benefit of alcohol by rogoshen1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So now men are expected to be mind readers, sussing out a woman's mental state? Are you serious. We're notoriously bad at figuring this out.

      The real problem that YOU'RE tuning out is that women should be treated equally under the law. If a man were to be 'coerced' into drinking, he'd be responsible for his actions (up to, and including calling a fucking cab.) Women should not be excused for poor decision making simply because of consuming a few too many free drinks from the shady dude at the end of the bar.

      Since Slashdot is full of pedantic twats, the situation I am NOT describing is a guy having sex with a girl who's passed out. That's rape, and that's wrong. but a girl who's had a few too many drinks is just as responsible for her body and her actions as a guy in the same situation. Either women are equal to men in terms of agency and responsibility, or they're not. The SJW machine does not get to pick and choose elements of equality to go by.

    21. Re: The health benefit of alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody is saying that, but if it's not clear that she's capable of consent, you just don't have sex. I'm not sure what's so hard to grasp about that.

    22. Re: The health benefit of alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, YOU'RE right, women should be treated equally under the law and I apologize if my post came off as implying I thought otherwise. I was really just trying to point out that car analogies are silly and that silly analogies can be countered with other silly facts (like the fact that you could get out of a DUI if you "didn't realize you were intoxicated")

      The REAL problem that I was trying to elucidate that I feel is being "tuned out":

      Determining if rape accusations are justified or false is EXTREMELY hard to do. It's all in people's minds (was she actually traumitized by the experience or just being spiteful? Did he genuinely believe she was knowingly consenting or was he being maliciously manipulative?) and it becomes a he-said/she-said argument which we all know is ridiculous and futile to try to apply law to. So while the LEGAL justice system struggles with that, from a SOCIAL justice point of view, why don't we as men do the right thing to help out our fellow ladies and encourage eachother to maybe not sleep with that drunk chick you just met since maybe she might regret it in the morning.

      That's all I'm saying. Be the better man and take the high road. Ladies will appreciate that and probably as a result be more receptive to the idea of having sex regardless of alcohol, and the ones who find that weak or lame or boring? Maybe, just maybe, they were the type who were more likely to cry rape out of spite later on anyways and you've just avoided a bad situation.

    23. Re: The health benefit of alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took me a while to realize what PIV stood for. Wow...

      Is this blog serious? I thought it was a parody of feminism, but seems to have too many followers and commenters to be a joke. If it's real.... Oh my!

  4. So you're saying Free as in Beer is meaningless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought so!

  5. I never thought it did. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is coffee still evil or does that cure cancer this week? The true killer is sitting in an office with a shit bag of a boss on your case everyday. But do every do a study of how bad for you a full time job is? NO!
    Make mine a double, Cheers!

    1. Re:I never thought it did. by umghhh · · Score: 1

      Actually I recall study that showed that most of the time - the more you work, the shorter your lifespan is. There are of course exceptions - working on own farm in a fresh air of Kaukasus was one. Working on a small farm in India is not.Or to put it bluntly - roof maker is not going to work till official legal pension age because of health issues, a white collar guy is not going to work till official pension age but his life is still going to be shorter and more miserable than those of the '1% elite' - those that can afford to work as much as they want and take care of their health when need be.

  6. Don't believe anything by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real take home lesson for this is not to put much faith in any observational study. Such studies typically inflate the magnitude of the putative effect (both for 'good' and 'bad'), typically use inappropriate statistical methodology and suffer from various well known sources of bias (as noted in TFA).

    Unfortunately, it makes progress in the medical field very slow and inconsistent since good studies are difficult to impossible to do. Basically, you're gonna die at some point. Within some broad levels of moderation, do what makes you happy. Imbibe what ever makes you feel good.

    Don't sweat the details. Even though we live in a world with horrible chemicals, air pollution, endocrine disrupters, radiation, GMOs and PETA most of the Western world is living longer and healthier than ever. Not that there aren't problems with the world - presumably we can do better, but the constant drumbeat of falling skies can safely be ignored.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:Don't believe anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the record, how many PETA members have you eaten?

    2. Re:Don't believe anything by Forgefather · · Score: 1

      I eat one per month, but a new study has shown that there isn't a correlation to health benefits after all.

      --
      "There are lies, there are damn lies, and there are statistics"
    3. Re:Don't believe anything by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 1

      Basically, you're gonna die at some point.

      Citation please.

    4. Re:Don't believe anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the record, how many PETA members have you eaten?

      None. I enjoy being a member of PETA: People Eating Tasty Animals.

    5. Re:Don't believe anything by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I would have thought there would be given how those people generally preach the benefits of eating organic hormone free, antibiotic free, free range, humanly raised, responsibly farmed food.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    6. Re:Don't believe anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. It is much better than being a vegetarian... Which from my understanding is old cave man speak for "village idiot who cannot hunt".

    7. Re:Don't believe anything by Zordak · · Score: 1
      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    8. Re:Don't believe anything by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The real take home lesson for this is not to put much faith in any observational study.

      Right - there was a study out just a month or two ago that demonstrated that a few specific genotypes process alcohol differently than others and do have a real benefit. No doubt _this_ study was in publication before that one came out.

      Most of these broad pronouncements for a population are worthless - humans aren't so homogenous.

      Still, unless you know you have that genotype, you may be doing yourself harm, especially in regards to cancer, so take it easy on the hootch.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    9. Re:Don't believe anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd correct you on that point--don't believe anything, period.

      Experiments have their own biases--I'd argue they're more susceptible to publication bias, if not estimation bias, and are less likely to generalize to real-world scenarios.

      And in any event, there's an irony to your statement: the linked article isn't actually a study. It's an editorial. And where are the cited studies critical of alcohol's benefits coming from? Addiction journals. So addiction researchers, who make a living from trying to get people to stop drinking, are publishing studies saying alcohol isn't good for you, and then people publish an editorial, and it's reported as a "study." (I don't drink, for what it's worth.)

      You're right not to believe anything you read, but ironically, that includes the very paper you're commenting on.

    10. Re:Don't believe anything by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 1

      Productivity reduced, thanks!

  7. The Pendulum by ScooterComputer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, the pendulum has finally swung back to center, where anyone with an ounce of intellect could have figured it belonged all along. Alcohol isn't "good for you", moderate consumption is neither good nor particularly bad, and overconsumption (as with most things) has consequences. Hysteria on both sides--prohibitionists and snake-oil peddlers--discredited.

    Not surprised.

    --
    Scott
    "Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
    1. Re:The Pendulum by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2

      So, the pendulum has finally swung back to center, where anyone with an ounce of intellect could have figured it belonged all along.

      Until the next study comes along...

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    2. Re:The Pendulum by cdogg4ya · · Score: 1

      Next they will say Chocolate isn't healthy for you either...so I'll have to stop drinking Chocolate beer.

    3. Re:The Pendulum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hang on a second. That's just crazy talk!

    4. Re:The Pendulum by morkk · · Score: 1

      Everything in moderation, especially moderation.

  8. Mental health benefits by cahuenga · · Score: 0

    Sometimes you need to take the edge off and for me it's either going to be cocktails/weed or something pharmaceutical. I'm just not a big fan of pills.

  9. Heheh he said 'hard' by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Ahhh, the ongoing march of hard endpoint outcomes analysis daggers another belief.

    Niacin, various vitamins absent particular diagnosed deficiencies, multivitamins, guess what? Chicken butt. No difference in long term outcomes.

    My only concern is certain possibly beneficial heart drugs were abandoned in phase iii stidies because they slightly increased death rates. There could be benefit there for subpopulations if the deaths cluster about some physiology type, which maybe could be pre-tested for, or monitored closely.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  10. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay perpetually conflicting medical reports. Eggs are good, eggs are bad. Alcohol is good, alcohol isn't good. Chocolate is good, chocolate is bad. Saturated fat is bad, saturated fat is good. I'll pass on clickbait medical research. Michael Pollen summed it up best , "Eat food, not too much, mostly plants". I look forward to the release of the new study proclaiming the health benefits of moderate drinking.

    1. Re:Who cares? by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      I care. It adds fuel to the anti-vaxxers, climate change deniers and similar nut-jobs when they can cite contradictory scientific studies as a reason not to trust scientists. So it's kind of a big deal.

      Also it's Michael Palin, not Pollen, to everyone with the possible exception of Eric the Half-a-Bee.

    2. Re:Who cares? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      pollan.

    3. Re:Who cares? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      But nutrition science is not like physics, or even any other field of medicine other than, perhaps, psychiatry: it's still in the process of jelling as a discipline. There was a recent thread on this very topic.

  11. It changes every week by ZorinLynx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Eggs are bad for you! Eggs are good for you! Meat is bad for you! Meat is good for you! Alcohol is good for you! Alcohol isn't good for you!

    I swear, if you listen to and heed all this advice you will go crazy. I think the best thing to do is ignore all this crap, eat *reasonably* (not too much of any one thing, have a balanced diet) and just ENJOY the things you like, regardless of people saying they're good or bad for you, because life is short anyway and we might as well enjoy it while we have it.

    I see so many eating bland vegan diets, thinking it's so good for them; I doubt any of them will live longer than typical omnivores.

    1. Re:It changes every week by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Clorox naysayers!!!

    2. Re:It changes every week by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2

      Eggs are bad for you! Eggs are good for you! Meat is bad for you! Meat is good for you! Alcohol is good for you! Alcohol isn't good for you!...

      Yeah, it's enough to drive one to drinking....

      Maybe there should be a survey done about the effects on longevity based upon whether or not one reads all these "studies".

    3. Re:It changes every week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I see so many eating bland vegan diets, thinking it's so good for them; I doubt any of them will live longer than typical omnivores.

      And now studies are showing that while vegetarians do have a "healthier" weight on average they are overall less healthy and live shorter lives than omnivores.

    4. Re:It changes every week by neminem · · Score: 1

      At this point, it's pretty much conclusively determined that pretty much everything except for literal poison is both good for you in some way, and bad for you in some other way. And that's probably not even wrong - everything probably really *is* both good and bad for you. So screw it, eat what you like. (Unless it's literal poison.)

    5. Re:It changes every week by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      Eggs are bad for you! Eggs are good for you! Meat is bad for you! Meat is good for you! Alcohol is good for you! Alcohol isn't good for you!

      I swear, if you listen to and heed all this advice you will go crazy. I think the best thing to do is ignore all this crap, eat *reasonably* (not too much of any one thing, have a balanced diet) and just ENJOY the things you like, regardless of people saying they're good or bad for you, because life is short anyway and we might as well enjoy it while we have it.

      I see so many eating bland vegan diets, thinking it's so good for them; I doubt any of them will live longer than typical omnivores.

      While this is true, the only reason we know what a 'balanced' diet looks like, or what it's *near* atleast, is the years of study. There's nothing to say what a balanced diet is without some understanding of the component parts and their effect on your body.

      Unfortunately it looks like with our current research methodology we are at the limits of what can be said about food... we're now wobbling around saying things are good, and then bad, and then maybe neutral. You're right about not listening too much to each individual study's result.

      So rejoice, you can relax and not worry because at the coarse level we understand roughly what balanced is.

    6. Re:It changes every week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that taking everything with a grain of salt and not jumping on a bandwagon solely because it supports my views a good precursor to not being too confused or tossed back and forth.

      Try taking information in moderation - its good for you.

    7. Re:It changes every week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eggs are bad for you! Eggs are good for you! Meat is bad for you! Meat is good for you! Alcohol is good for you! Alcohol isn't good for you!

      I swear, if you listen to and heed all this advice you will go crazy. I think the best thing to do is ignore all this crap, eat *reasonably* (not too much of any one thing, have a balanced diet) and just ENJOY the things you like, regardless of people saying they're good or bad for you . . .

      It always amazes how something so obvious passes for insight. I figured that out, like, 20 years ago. You had to be the last one, so I guess that makes 100% of the population that now knows.

      I see so many eating bland vegan diets, thinking it's so good for them; I doubt any of them will live longer than typical omnivores.

      Considering all herbs and spices come from plants, vegan diets are the furthest thing from bland. Please don't use your prejudices to promote myths. I'm not a vegan, btw.

    8. Re:It changes every week by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I find that taking everything with a grain of salt and not jumping on a bandwagon solely because it supports my views a good precursor to not being too confused or tossed back and forth.

      Try taking information in moderation - its good for you.

      Salt is bad for you ....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:It changes every week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These studies : Adventist Health Studies say otherwise. The diet doesn't have to be vegan. For cultural reasons, a large percentage of Seventh-day Adventists are lacto-ovo vegetarians. There are also prohibitions on tobacco and alcohol. The studies show that California Adventists live longer, healthier lives than the average American.

    10. Re:It changes every week by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      You make the mistake of listening to articles about scientific research instead of actually reading the research. Additionally, you make the mistake of thinking that one study == Truth. Especially in biology and medecine, with hugely complicated machines and enormous difficulty setting up good controls, a single study is almost meaningless.

      Wait for studies to confirm others, wait for things to percolate through the scientific community, then start paying attention to it.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    11. Re:It changes every week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this point, it's pretty much conclusively determined that pretty much everything except for literal poison is both good for you in some way, and bad for you in some other way. And that's probably not even wrong - everything probably really *is* both good and bad for you. So screw it, eat what you like. (Unless it's literal poison.)

      Ethyl alcohol is literally a poison. It can kill you from acute toxicity and from long term damage. The fact that people like the way it affects their mental state gets many people to ignore the fact that it is poison.

    12. Re:It changes every week by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

      Oxygen is literally a poison. It can kill you from acute toxicity and from long term damage. The fact that people like the way it affects their mental state gets many people to ignore the fact that it is poison.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    13. Re:It changes every week by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      What we can say is bad is refined sugar, high fructose corn syrup, and other manufactured/highly processed foods.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    14. Re:It changes every week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even poisons are not so black and white. poisons are regularly used in treatments of various conditions. many items are also both extremely good for you and completely toxic depending on the level of consumption.

    15. Re:It changes every week by umghhh · · Score: 1

      if the grain of salt is too frequent it is bad for you too.
      Just saying...

    16. Re:It changes every week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its one study from Austria following 330 Austrian vegetarians over a year. As the study itself states it is not an indication of causality as you suggest:

      "no statements can be made whether the poorer health in vegetarians in our study is caused by their dietary habit or if they consume this form of diet
      due to their poorer health status"

      http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchObject.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0088278&representation=PDF

    17. Re:It changes every week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now studies are showing that while vegetarians do have a "healthier" weight on average they are overall less healthy and live shorter lives than omnivores.

      And yet, many other studies show the opposite. What is your point again?

    18. Re:It changes every week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see so many eating bland vegan diets, thinking it's so good for them; I doubt any of them will live longer than typical omnivores.

      Two things:

      1. If you think that a vegan diet is bland, maybe you haven't been looking in the right places. Blandness or variety can be seen in any kind of diet.
      2. For many vegans/vegetarians, the main reason to choose the diet is not the possible health benefits (but the possibility is of course a nice side effect).

    19. Re:It changes every week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dose makes the poison. Moderate drinking is not associated with any long-term damage, nor is it associated with acute toxicity.

  12. drinking for health reasons? by moondo · · Score: 1

    this article just gave me another reason to drink. thanks.

  13. Social health benefits by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    I suspect the positive benefits found were because people who are relaxed and pro-social enough to have the occasional drink and a laugh with friends are going to be less solitary and stressed individuals.

    It's well known that people with a support group do better on several health and longevity metrics than solitary stoics.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:Social health benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's well known that people with a support group do better on several health and longevity metrics than solitary stoics.

      If those solitary stoics want to be social but feel they can't, maybe. It's quite different for people who don't desire to socialize much at all (introverts).

  14. other shocking revelations about alcohol. by nimbius · · Score: 4, Informative

    1. That giant frozen bullet train traveling at six times the speed of sound through crowded metropolitan areas is not only fake, but scientifically impossible.
    2. Budweiser is found with friends and during good times, but is also accompanied by its lesser known entourage blurred vision, karaoke, screaming, and in high levels nudity and parking lot fits of vomiting.
    3. The anthropomorphic frogs could never enunciate a trademarked brand name, and the black screaming "whats up" men were no more than modern day black minstrel charicatures. your black friends cannot be counted on to make this noise as consistently as claimed.
    4. patron, fireball, hennessey, hypnotiq, and hundreds of other brands arent directly marketed to youth. Unless you count about a hundred different songs or more that directly associate them with happiness, friendship, and success.
    5. 7 martinis and a suit makes you a vomiting insurance liability, not james bond.
    6. Dogs and clydesdales do not drink or transport alcohol anymore. Alcohol is transported through a sophisticated network of trucking and trans national freight.
    7. Your government lies to you about alcohol because it enjoys a sizeable degree of revenue from its sale through artificially imposed monopoly, driving checkpoints, fines, and incarceration.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:other shocking revelations about alcohol. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... giant frozen bullet train... wha?

    2. Re:other shocking revelations about alcohol. by spitzak · · Score: 1

      He's referring to the Coors "Silver Bullet" ads.

      There was an Onion article about the disastrous derailment of one of those bullet trains that caused mass casualties of young hip partying people.

    3. Re:other shocking revelations about alcohol. by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Coors commercial.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  15. Did they take suicide into account? by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm just saying after a year in the control group I'd have been ready to end it all :)

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    1. Re:Did they take suicide into account? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny but also sad. Alcohol is a risk factor for suicide. If you've ever cleaned out the home of a friend afterwards, like me, you've probably had a similar experience... "look at all the empty bottles" and/or "what are we even going to do with all this leftover booze"

    2. Re:Did they take suicide into account? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Funny but also sad. Alcohol is a risk factor for suicide. If you've ever cleaned out the home of a friend afterwards, like me, you've probably had a similar experience... "look at all the empty bottles" and/or "what are we even going to do with all this leftover booze"

      Drink it. Did you think of that?

    3. Re:Did they take suicide into account? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the most obtuse statement I've seen today. People don't show up to clean up a suicide-ed relative/friend's place and throw a kegger.

      The point is that too many people who take their own life are using alcohol to self medicate - and many times they make a rash decision because of impaired judgement.

    4. Re:Did they take suicide into account? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correlation and causation, I'm sure I've heard some saying about that around here. From what I've seen and read it is the depression that drives them to drink and ultimately to commit suicide.

    5. Re:Did they take suicide into account? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, if they did the alcoholics would really skew the data against alcohol.

  16. The myth is not its basis by andywest · · Score: 1

    I do not know how 'red wine' got inflated to 'any form of hooch', and 'resveratrol' to 'ethanol'. I guess it is typical human folly in which the red wine story was transmuted into an excuse to get totally wasted ... with help from the 'alcohol industry'. (Since when do you need an industry to help you get drunk?)

    It is the red wine, taken in moderation and with food, that is supposed to be healthful: Not Pabst nor Thunderbird nor Jack Daniels taken with the bottom of the bottle up in the air.

    --
    --- Andy West http://andywest.org
    1. Re:The myth is not its basis by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      I do not know how 'red wine' got inflated to 'any form of hooch'

      Red red wine you make me feel so fine
      You keep me rocking all of the time
      Red red wine you make me feel so grand
      I feel a million dollars when your just in my hand
      Red red wine you make me feel so sad
      Any time I see you go it makes me feel bad
      Red red wine you make me feel so fine
      Monkey pack him rizla pon the sweet dep line
      Red red wine you give me whole heap of zing
      Whole heap of zing mek me do me own thing
      Red red wine you really know how fi love
      Your kind of loving like a blessing from above
      Red red wine I love you right from the start
      Right from the start with all of my heart
      Red red wine in a 80's style
      Red red wine in a modern beat style, yeah

    2. Re:The myth is not its basis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This applies to red wine as well. There never was a basis for a healthful finding outside of industry-sponsored studies.

    3. Re:The myth is not its basis by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      That and the entire nation of France. Ever heard of the French Paradox?

    4. Re:The myth is not its basis by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      And the levels of resveratrol in wine are so low that their effects, given our current understanding, cannot explain the 'French Paradox.' Basically, nutritional science is full of nonsense, and nutritional science regarding alcohol is even worse. So, if you are making claims either way about the health effects of alcohol that aren't 'don't drown yourself in it' and 'hell if I know,' you are probably full of shit.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    5. Re:The myth is not its basis by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 2

      I would have thought it was all the walking. Seriously they walk or take public transportation everywhere. Also even though their food is very rich it isn't the laoded with fillers stuff you find in the US but instead it is made with real components of food.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    6. Re:The myth is not its basis by Quirkz · · Score: 2

      I think you forgot the line about the cosmonauts.

  17. Not a study by Tx · · Score: 5, Informative

    Very misleading summary (yeah, duh). This is not a study, it is an editorial. Someone's opinion. It says so right at the top. Note at the bottom of the article; "Provenance and peer review: Commissioned; not externally peer reviewed."

    It's incredibly misleading to cite this article as a "study", all it is is an opinion piece article, nothing more.

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
    1. Re:Not a study by Tx · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok, now I've seen the link to the study, I take back what I said above. Sorry, I've been drinking.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
  18. LDS faith has taught this for 150 years by TodoRojo · · Score: 0

    From Doctrine and Covenants, Section 89: "Behold, verily, thus saith the Lord unto you: In consequence of evils and designs which do and will exist in the hearts of conspiring men in the last days, I have warned you, and forewarn you, by giving unto you this word of wisdom by revelation— that inasmuch as any man drinketh wine or strong drink among you, behold it is not good, neither meet in the sight of your Father,"

    1. Re:LDS faith has taught this for 150 years by gurps_npc · · Score: 0, Troll
      True. Question - is that anywhere near near the section that says it is OK to kill non-believer families that try to pass through your territory, kidnap their surviving children, blame it on Indians, and protect the guilty when the US government comes calling.

      What, you don't think it's appropriate for me to bring up unrelated points?

      You know what, you are right. We should all stop bringing up off-topic facts about the Mormons.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    2. Re:LDS faith has taught this for 150 years by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 0

      Took a big road trip through the Southwest a couple of years ago, and noted that while in New Mexico there was a huge public service campaign against drunk driving: billboards, checkpoints, radio warnings - in Utah, all the PSAs seem to see the big problem as drowsy driving. Not only do Mormons not drink, but with coffee and Coke also off the roadside picnic table, drivers fall asleep a lot there.

    3. Re:LDS faith has taught this for 150 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah, the obligatory "the LDS already know this, because our church is true" bullshit. Whatever the modern Mormon church is preaching these days doesn't even seem to have anything at all to do with some writings produced by someone said to be somehow related to the same movement a hundred and fifty years ago. And it's not like dozens of other people weren't voicing "the Lord" in the mid-nineteenth century when dry, Protestant America hated wet, Catholic immigrants.

      Anyway, are you even sure that your doctrine and covenants means what you think it means? "It is not good that any man drink wine or strong drink **among you**" Yes, keep your wine and hard liquors in private. And then your section 89 recommends mild drinks made from barley, which are what? Beers and ales. Those are "mild" drinks, because they lack the higher alcoholic content of "strong" drinks. Yes, and make sure you make your own wine for the sacrament. Oh yeah, and P.S., this is not given by commandment, just as advice, which has been targeted specifically at the weakest of you. That's right, because the "weakest" are the abusers/alcoholics who could benefit from some regulation and would be better off washing their bodies with their booze than putting it in their bellies. Everybody else, carry on. Enjoy responsibly.

      Doesn't seem like a god who has a particular beef with alcohol, if you ask me. Of course section 89 is almost certainly the result of delusion, anyway.

      Well, I've found that you mormons don't even read your own scriptures. You just "recite" them and call the sophomoric interpretations given to you by characterless, weak-minded men in business suits "divine revelation." Used to be that "mormons" were badass megalomaniac tyrants like Brigham Young, or eccentric, philandering money-diggers like Joseph Smith who liked his pleasures served up with a heaping side of punishment. Men of towering follies and equal brilliance; true old-fashioned Americans, as it were. These days you run investment firms and build shopping malls and palatial temples unto a man who once had no place to lay his head. Once you walked barefoot over a frozen continent and massacred settlers for looking at you wrongly; now you make god-awful movies and maudlin kitsch, because hey, if you can manipulate people's emotions, that's proof the church is true.

      Gah... I need a drink.

    4. Re:LDS faith has taught this for 150 years by Zordak · · Score: 0

      Answer - There is no section that says that. It's true that some Mormons once slaughtered a group of passing settlers. It was unequivocally a bad thing to do. It can be slightly better understood (but not excused) by understanding the circumstances. Mormons were quite paranoid of outsiders, since they and their families had been driven out of several cities, raped, and murdered. There was hysteria about Johnston's Army coming into the territory, conquering it, and again raping and murdering people (this was right in the middle of the "Utah War"). In the midst of that hysteria, one group of people went completely nuts and did some horrible, inexcusable things. At first, they told Brigham Young that Indians did it, and Brigham (probably reluctant to believe that some of his own people could do something so heinous), believed them. A local grand jury also failed to indict, again probably reluctant to believe that some of their own could do something so heinous. Years later, federal prosecutors came in, and when it became clear that John Lee and his friends had in fact been responsible, the church excommunicated them (which is the worst penalty a church can or should be able to levy). Years later, Lee was convicted by an all-Mormon jury and shot, and Brigham Young opined that Lee got less than he deserved. There have been some efforts to implicate Brigham Young as a co-conspirator, but it takes a lot of winking at the actual evidence to get there. Many people believe that he made mistakes in how he handled the situation, which is a more supportable proposition.

      Bringing up facts about Mormons is fine. But if you're going to do it, learn the whole story. Don't just parrot some anti-Mormon sound bite you once heard from somebody.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    5. Re:LDS faith has taught this for 150 years by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      NO, it is not fine. You clue-lessly missed the sarcasm.

      The point is that this was a thread about alcohol, not a thread about Mormonism. Many religions have rules against alcohol. Bringing up a quote from his specific religion was totally in-appropriate. It was off topic, obnoxious and rude.

      So i responded in kind - bringing up pretty much the worst incident about Mormonism to make a point, that it is NOT appropriate to push your religion into a discussion that had nothing to do with it.

      And I knew the whole story. My leaving it out was part of the sarcasm, that you clearly missed.

      I understand that Mormons have a religious requirement to preach. But there is a time and place for that. You never saw Huntsman or Romney do it while they were campaigning. Why? Because it would have been inappropriate. Similarly it was INAPPROPRIATE to do it here on Slashdot. If you want to be evangelical, go door to door in a residential are, or find a website that encourages that kind of behavior.

      We don't encourage it. This is a tech website, not a forum for anyone to preach at us.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  19. They could add by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    "Beneficial associations between low intensity alcohol consumption and all cause mortality may in part be attributable to inappropriate selection of a referent group and weak adjustment for confounders. Selection biases may also play a part."

    ... and the pint of strong lager that they drank before working on the paper probably didn't help much either.

  20. What a crock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hardly drink at all ( a beer every few months),
    but this article says I should!

    They say there IS significant improvement for mena 50-64 and woman 65+. Then they turn around and say that the health benefits are overblown.

    "Ya dude, it's real, but not huge and anybody that says different did it wrong, because like... reasons and stuff".

    Stupid article. Stupid conclusion.

  21. Bah. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    I know better. After a bit of strong drink I get +2 STR, +6 INT, +9 WIS, +2 DEX, +5 CON, and +8 CHA - and the effects last *exactly* until I sober up.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  22. Basic chemistry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd always suspected Alcohol's health benefits are something akin to it being a solvent. Getting some in your blood stream allows it to dissolve or loosen plaque and buildup that are more alcohol soluble than water soluble. That, and, perhaps its helps kill some invasive microorganisms.

    Alcohol has been with us for quite some time. Humans have been brewing longer than recorded history (Its an important preservative and water sanitation technique) And previous to that we've been collecting fermented fruit from the ground (Animals do this too. Birds /love/ getting drunk)

    Sure, don't pickle your liver every night. There's no way that could be good for you.

  23. Alcohol? Is this 1980? by dicobalt · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows e-cigs are the new excuse to do something you know deep in your mind is bad but write it off as being okay.

  24. Exercise by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    Exercise is the area where a lot of people can attain significant, proven health benefits.

  25. Yah right by KlomDark · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a bunch of teatotaller biased bullshit.

    Don't even drink any more, but this is stupid. Thinning your blood minorly once per day has got to be good for your heart rather than it pounding full strength all the time.

    Whatever, this is nonsense. Next they'll say vaccines are bad for you...

    This world is turning stupider by the second.

    1. Re:Yah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People latch onto studies all the time to justify their behavior. Even the anti-vax people have a study...

      Here is the facts. People are using science to justify getting blasted. This includes both alcohol and weed.

      Just be honest with yourself. You want to get blasted. Is that so hard?

    2. Re:Yah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thinning your blood minorly once per day has got to be good for your heart rather than it pounding full strength all the time

      I am actually quite scared for public health to have this be at least the third time I have seen this assertion. Where is this coming from?

      THIS IS NONSENSE.

  26. Correlation is not Causation (Cliche) by gurps_npc · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Yes, it is a cliche, but an accurate one. It became a cliche because of how often people make the mistake.

    The quiet truth is that if you are sick or have any real health issues, you stop drinking alcohol. Alcohol is a powerful drug that affects your body in many ways. If you are not healthy, you often can not drink it.

    Moreover, most healthy people in the US drink alcohol. It is one of the primary social activities that people engage in. Look at dating events, they almost always alcohol.

    As such, people that do not drink alcohol fall into three general categories. Religious, Sickly, and Ex-Alcoholics.

    So cause and effect were reversed. Being healthy lets you drink alcohol, rather than drinking alcohol making you healthy.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Correlation is not Causation (Cliche) by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 1

      >>As such, people that do not drink alcohol fall into three general categories. Religious, Sickly, and Ex-Alcoholics.

      Actually I know a bunch of non-drinkers who simply don't like the taste (beer, wine, hard liquor, etc.)

    2. Re:Correlation is not Causation (Cliche) by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 1

      I can definitely agree with this.

      I know many people, including myself, that don't drink alcohol because it tastes bad. I have tried various kinds of alcohol and in all cases it has tasted worse than other drinks I could get.

      There is supposed to be a mutation in a very small percentage of people and it gives alcohol a pretty nasty taste.

      I have NO ethical problems with alcohol, I don't mind being around others that are drinking it I just don't like it myself.

      --
      Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
    3. Re:Correlation is not Causation (Cliche) by MorePower · · Score: 1

      Count me in that group too. I used to be all uptight about alcohol, but I got over it with age. Now that I'm theoretically ok with making oneself stupider, I've tried to take up drinking. But I find that all the alcoholic beverages I've tried to drink taste horrendously bad. I've so far been unable to drink enough alcohol to notice any effects on myself (it takes me about an hour and a half to choke down a bottle of beer). I don't know how you all manage to consume that stuff.

    4. Re:Correlation is not Causation (Cliche) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is a cliche, but an accurate one. It became a cliche because of how often people make the mistake.

      The quiet truth is that if you are sick or have any real health issues, you stop drinking alcohol. Alcohol is a powerful drug that affects your body in many ways. If you are not healthy, you often can not drink it.

      Moreover, most healthy people in the US drink alcohol. It is one of the primary social activities that people engage in. Look at dating events, they almost always alcohol.

      As such, people that do not drink alcohol fall into three general categories. Religious, Sickly, and Ex-Alcoholics.

      So cause and effect were reversed. Being healthy lets you drink alcohol, rather than drinking alcohol making you healthy.

      This makes no sense whatsoever, and does not take into account those of us who are able to look past all of this bullshit and simply realize that an adult can survive and thrive in society without consuming alcohol.

      And no, we don't have to give some pathetic reason like we're recovering addicts, or my sky daddy says I shouldn't. Give me a fucking break.

      Alcohol is a poison to the human body. These latest studies are showing that clearer than ever. If you want to spin that fact any other way than that, you're simply another adult who feels we need alcohol to survive.

      Enjoy your excuses, but know they are just that; excuses.

    5. Re:Correlation is not Causation (Cliche) by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      { joke } That would be the sickly group {/joke}

      But seriously, while I agree they exist (I am in fact one of them), we are a small percentage of the population.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    6. Re:Correlation is not Causation (Cliche) by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      Wow. A lot of anger there.

      You have some serious issues. If I were you, I would look into talking to someone about them.

      For the record:

      I have the super taster gene. Like many such people, alcohol tastes extremely bitter and I have never liked it. When I did go out with friends, I usually bought one drink to be sociable, but never finished the dreadful thing.

      But wait, it gets worse. Before I turned 30, I had contracted a disease that damaged my kidney. As such my doctor advised me to not drink alcohol again. So I don't.

      So when you say I need alcohol to survive I laugh. Repeatedly.

      I gave no excuses. I described the world accurately. You on the other hand feel the need to preach. Anonymously.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    7. Re:Correlation is not Causation (Cliche) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As such, people that do not drink alcohol fall into three general categories. Religious, Sickly, and Ex-Alcoholics.

      I know plenty of people that have never drank and are anything but "Sickly". They are health and fitness nuts, rock climbers or long time martial artists. Most are atheist as well. I know it's anecdotal, but sickly would not describe any non-drinking person I know.

    8. Re:Correlation is not Causation (Cliche) by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      Or people like me that simply gave it up. Not because I had a problem with alcohol but because, for me, the downside outweighed the benefits. The more I read about it the more convinced I became that alcohol was simply bad for my body. I exercise regularly and I eat healthy foods. Why spoil all that by introducing toxins into my body?

      Quite honestly, the biggest adjustment has been social. A lot of my friends drink. Some of my former friends stopped hanging out with me when they heard that I don't drink. So be it.

    9. Re:Correlation is not Causation (Cliche) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sod off. I hate the taste. Alcohol to me is disgusting.

    10. Re:Correlation is not Causation (Cliche) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure they exist, quite a few of them - but we're talking about statistics here. In order to create a correlation, all you need is a significant group of people for whom the factor is true.

      And the generalisation given in the GP is true for more than enough people to create a statistically significant correlation. Even with "other groups", to whom it doesn't apply, confounding it.

    11. Re:Correlation is not Causation (Cliche) by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Actually I know a bunch of non-drinkers who simply don't like the taste (beer, wine, hard liquor, etc.)

      Yup! I don't have anything against alcohol (though I do have something against becoming temporarily retarded), and I've tried quite a few kinds of alcoholic drinks. I've found some I like... but I'm pretty sure I like them despite the alcohol.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    12. Re:Correlation is not Causation (Cliche) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It gets BETTER! There's another option aside from [ religious, sickly, ex-alch, distaste ] ... there's my reason for not drinking. I'm trying to maximize health, and think it's bad for health to drink.

      Here's where things get crazy. I am not in data about this because I am too confounded by my other health habits - and I have a selection bias against alcohol specifically for what they are trying to control for.

  27. Winston Churchill by goombah99 · · Score: 2, Informative

    +1 And some hate that all the conversations are lost due to alcohool and therefore don't like to socialize with drunken idiots.

    But in the morning I'll be sober and happy, but you will still be bitter.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Winston Churchill by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      But in the morning I'll be sober and happy, but you will still be bitter.

      Yup, I feel sorry for people that don't ever drink.

      When they wake up in the morning, that is the best they will feel all day!!

      ;)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Winston Churchill by rogoshen1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you're sober and *happy* the morning after drinking; you drank in moderation.
      (Or you're Irish.)

    3. Re:Winston Churchill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only drink twice a week: first for 3 days and then for 4.

    4. Re:Winston Churchill by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      Yup, I feel sorry for people that don't ever drink.

      When they wake up in the morning, that is the best they will feel all day!!

      I know nothing about not ever drinking, but a few years back i went for a year without drinking alcohol (or coffee or tea, etc) - and when i woke up in the mornings that was pretty much the best i'd felt all my life!

      Unfortunately, circumstances conspired to gradually start me drinking again.

  28. Article debunked here... by shabble · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://velvetgloveironfist.blo...

    The [lack of health benefits] claim is based on the fact that most of the risk reductions in the latter two tables are not statistically significant, except for women aged 65 and over. But there is a simple reason for this which some cynical people would call a trick. A relatively small sample has been taken and then split into different age groups, sexes and consumption levels to create dozens of even smaller samples. This, combined with the fact that there are relatively few never-drinkers to use as a reference, makes it very difficult to generate statistically significant results from any individual group.

    If you combined the age groups, the reduction in mortality would reach significance. If you combined the genders, it would reach significance. If you combined the various different drinking levels and simply compared those who drank moderately with those who never drank, it would reach significance.

    1. Re:Article debunked here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice work. I will be sure to hoist my next craft ipa to you.

    2. Re:Article debunked here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Also: http://understandinguncertainty.org/misleading-conclusions-alcohol-protection-study
      The graphs are interesting (apparently showing reduction of risk, with huge error bars).

      "they have committed the cardinal sin of saying that non-significance is the same as 'no effect' in a study lacking sufficient events, in this case, deaths in non-drinkers"

      "The graphs suggest the following points:
      - All groups consuming less than 20 units a week experienced lower mortality rates than the lifelong teetotalers.
      - The confidence intervals are very wide. This is because there were few teetotalers and so not many deaths - for example the entire comparison for 50-64 year-olds is based on 17 deaths in the male baseline group, and 19 deaths in the females. This is completely inadequate to draw any firm conclusions, since there is large uncertainty about what the true underlying relative risks are."

  29. dot by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

    Hey....shut up.

  30. Half joke, half truth. by ThePhilips · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A study in the British Medical Journal shows that consuming alcohol — any volume, any type — does not increase life expectancy.

    That is the type of conclusions you get when you entrust research to the "scientitsts" types who never leave the lab.

    Alcohol helps overcome stress, which otherwise would cause more harm to health than the alcohol

    Alcohol helps to "loosen" up, which these days seems to be the only reason why western civilization is still procreating. Being born is the biggest health benefit a human can experience in their life.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    1. Re:Half joke, half truth. by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      It is the same as with the fight against smoking.

      Some science heads, beyound their health effect studies, are simply incapable of seeing the simple primitive truth of the smoking: it is a *social* habit.

      It is not about smoking per se, it is about a short break from the daily routine and a chance of sharing five minutes with your buddies.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    2. Re:Half joke, half truth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The two groups with the longest lives are Mormons and Seventh Day Adventists. What do they have in common? No alcohol, and no smoking. As the live appreciably longer than non smokers who drink, case closed.

    3. Re:Half joke, half truth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are generalizing from "your own (I presume) life" to "humanity in general". That's never valid.

      Alcohol "helps overcome stress"? - maybe. But lots of things do that. If alcohol weren't available, maybe a lot more people would take up jogging or some other aerobic exercise, which also "helps overcome stress". My (non-medically-qualified) guess is that that would, on balance, be healthier. Therefore, from the health point of view at least, alcohol is a very sub-optimal way to overcome stress. It also causes more stresses of its own, particularly among those who don't drink but are required to be around those who do, such as designated drivers...

      Alcohol helps procreation? - no, sorry, there is simply no evidence (that I've seen, and I have looked) that suggests a large fraction of the population was conceived under the influence of alcohol. (Although it might explain a thing or two if it were true.) Lots of people, every day, have unprotected sex while stone-cold sober. Alcohol may help you score a one-night stand, but that's unlikely (nowadays, since medical science gave us the tools to influence such things) to result in procreation.

    4. Re:Half joke, half truth. by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      But they also probably are not slaving 8-5 in the office, suffer no daily commute and no fast-food treatment due to the periodic emergencies in the office.

      Apples to oranges.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  31. Corrected basic chemistry by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    Well, alcohol is a solvent like water is a solvent.

    Like dissolves like. Alcohol and water are polar molecules, so those looking for their polar solvent fix could substitute water for alcohol and pocket the savings.

    Traditional "solvent", like say Turpentine or paint thinner is a non-polar molecule. Used to dissolve other non-polar molecules, like alkyd paint, or grease.

    --
    I come here for the love
    1. Re:Corrected basic chemistry by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Well not exactly. Take shellac in water is is basically non soluble but in ethanol it is soluble.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  32. This brought to you by the same people who studied by ihtoit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Aspartame. Oh wait, no they didn't. They just took the paid-for conclusion by the FDA that ant killer makes a safe substitute for refined sugar.
    Thalidomide. Oh wait, no, they completely ignore the MASSES of evidence of the harmful effects of thalidomide (missing limbs, protruding spinal clusters, etc) and give the go ahead to reintroduce it as a fucking antidepressant!
    Dietery fat and its connection to heart disease. Oh, wait, nope again. Not one single peer reviewed study into the connection at all, ever, anywhere by anybody yet the BMJ continues to publish unfounded claims that fat=bad.
    The resurgence of poliomyelitis and the concurrent (some might say contemporaneous) emergence of a previously little-known condition variously called Lou Gehrig's Disease, ALS, Motor Neurone Disease, Post Polio Residual Paralysis... all sharing the same root cause and displaying shockingly similar symptomology yet the BMJ being an industrial journal pursues the industry line that it's most certainly definitely NOT actually caused by the live polio vaccine in spite of ample evidence that puts it beyond the Black Swan level of anomaly and firmly into the "merits further study" box.

    When somebody says something is impossible, and someone else proves them wrong by a SINGLE proof sample, that's not an anomaly, that's SCIENCE.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  33. Disappointingly by dixonpete · · Score: 1

    Last night around 7pm I had a couple of ciders as an experiment as to the effects on my sleep. Even with that little alcohol I woke up at 4 and stayed awake till 6. Damn, there goes another fun thing out of my life. Alcohol is definitely not worth the life disruption. An age thing I guess.

  34. And in addendum... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    ...Wait 18 months and we'll change our minds again. Because, you know, Science.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  35. Who cares about length of life..... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Good Bourbon and Whiskey increase the QUALITY of life dramatically.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Who cares about length of life..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand cheap/american beer reduces the quality of life dramatically.

    2. Re:Who cares about length of life..... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      It depends, the typical Miller Lite drinker doesnt know any better.
      but then they also think "el Toro" tequila with the little sombrero hat cap is "good stuff", I've tasted kerosene that was better.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  36. Living with Skeptical Cynicism by fyngyrz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One thing to keep in mind is this observation: There are three kinds of lies: Lies, damn lies, and statistics.

    Another is that we really don't know how the body works yet, as evidenced by the (still) constantly shifting winds around cholesterol, fats, vitamins, carbohydrates, breast milk, and so on.

    It's also worth keeping in mind that a lot of "official information" (such as the food pyramid, almost anything at all related to the "drug war" and more) is utter nonsense cobbled up for reasons entirely unrelated to your well-being, or lack thereof, and that places ranging from GNC to Walmart have been caught red-handed selling what amounts to sawdust in bottles labeled as various herbs.

    It seems to me that the appropriate behavior WRT one's health at this time is moderation in all consumables of interest, avoidance of things your taste or immune system makes clear to you aren't positive experiences for you, while only really staying clear of things that science has actually nailed to the wall as seriously harmful, such as cocaine, tobacco, meth, any addictive substances (there really aren't all that many of these, it isn't much of an inconvenience to avoid them even if you're into drugs as entertainment.) Pay attention to your body's response to things you ingest. It's a simple enough idea, but one a lot of people simply don't take seriously. Drinking enough to ruin your next morning? Might be an important message in that for you...

    Get regular exercise -- I'm talking every day -- and don't sit at a desk (or anywhere else) for too long at any one time.

    Couple all that with carefully avoiding the legal system (inasmuch as the government spends a great deal of effort trying to turn your personal choices into excuses for jailing you) and you might survive long enough to see science figure out how we actually work -- and I suspect that will arrive at nearly the same time as solutions for the various downsides of this and that.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  37. Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jump to a conclusion that makes you look smart and the article look stupid!

    and if you can fit it in... Blame Obama for the whole thing!

    1. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama fan club, plz go.

  38. "moderate consumption" by gatfirls · · Score: 1

    You say that like it's a real thing with alcohol.

    The reality is that the needle pretty much swings right or left.

  39. The best thing about academic studies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that if you don't like or agree with the results you see today, just sit tight and another, equally-reputable university/journal/whatever will publish a paper next week with the exact opposite of these findings.

  40. Should have, would have, could have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sitting here lone with a barrel of industrial grade cleaning alcohol and a tube. My life is going to be lone but it's forever! Italian wine industry tells me so while they are infiltrating the media with anti-white wine messages targeting the white wines of Germany and Austria.

  41. We only look alike by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Someday soon, there will be the acknowledgement that - including taking our microbiomes into account - we only *look* the same but there are some weird cohorts below the racial and familial but above the DNA level that finally answers why studies like this and the same studies re-ran can be such a 'random walk' in their near-useless results.

  42. As with all health claims.. by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    ~ Your cholesterol level is 500! Wait, you haven't been using sunblock, have you?

    ~ Umm, well, yeah.

    ~ You IDIOT!

    .

  43. Re:This brought to you by the same people who stud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aspartame poisoning has been so debunked it's not even funny. Do you know how many cans of diet coke you have to drink to actually have a risk of hitting the LD50 of aspartame? Let me put it this way: You'll die from water poisoning, or possibly caffeine poisoning first.

    Perhaps for hot drinks people have reasoning to be leery, but if your body is hot enough to break down aspartame to formaldehyde, you're dead. It's fine for anything served cold.

    But go ahead, show me evidence to the contrary.

  44. Alcohol is the single biggest problem we face.... by erp_consultant · · Score: 2

    And I say this knowing that most people use alcohol in moderation (1-2 drinks per day). But I also know that alcohol is a massive problem in society. Have a read at this --> http://ncadd.org/index.php/in-...

    If you include deaths from drunk driving then alcohol is the single biggest killer in the United States - ahead of tobacco and all other illicit drugs (cocaine, heroin, etc.) combined. Not to mention assaults, etc. that are often fueled at least in part by alcohol.

    The notion that alcohol has health benefits is complete bunk. Red wine is probably the only one that can even make a case for it, although the amount of anti oxidants present in wine are minuscule at best. Certainly nowhere near that amounts that you would find in dark berry fruits such as cranberries and blueberries.

    So what of the negative effects? Have a read --> http://www.webmd.com/mental-he...

    Alcohol is toxic to human liver cells. If you have 1-2 drinks a day then the amount of toxins are negligible. More than that and there is a good chance that eventually you will develop cirrhosis of the liver. Or cardiovascular disease. Or certain types of cancer.

    I'm not saying that we should ban alcohol or that everyone should stop drinking. It's your body - do with it as you will. But I simply cannot accept the premise that alcohol is "healthy" in any way.

  45. orly?! by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    A biotoxin that kills basically all known living cells isn't good to drink? YOU DON'T SAY?! By the way, I've noticed a pattern. The doctors that say drinking a glass of wine per night if good for you are also incredibly fat and thus complete hypocrites and possibly alcoholics.

    1. Re:orly?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, I've noticed a pattern. The doctors that say drinking a glass of wine per night if good for you are also incredibly fat and thus complete hypocrites and possibly alcoholics.

      1. You haven't noticed that, you made it up.
      2. Even if #1 weren't a lie, that wouldn't make them hypocrites.
      3. Even if #1 weren't a lie and #2 weren't retarded, that wouldn't make them any more likely to be alcoholics.

      Go back to the Apple Store where you belong, hipster. You're not fit to survive in the real world.

  46. Re:This brought to you by the same people who stud by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    people born with the condition Phenylketonuria don't need to hit any sort of LD50 for aspartame, even tiny amounts will cause a violent reaction.

    As someone prone to hypoglycaemia, I have to avoid aspartame because it is known through peer-reviewed study to cause wild fluctuations in serum insulin, and I don't want to take the risk of going full-blown diabetic because of something I could have avoided. It also causes me crippling migraines that through process of elimination I have managed to discount EVERY OTHER POSSIBLE CAUSE.

    There's your evidence.

    For reference, here's some double-blind studies:

    RB Lipton et al. Aspartame as a dietary trigger of headache. Headache 1988 29: 90-92.
    KA Lapierre et al. The neuropsychiatric effects of aspartame in normal volunteers. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1990 30: 454-460.
    SS Schiffman et al. Aspartame and susceptibility to headache. New England Journal of Medicine 1987 317: 1181-1185.
    SM Koehler, A Garos. The effect of aspartame on migraine headache. Headache 1988 28: 10-13.
    SK Van Den Eeden et al. Aspartame ingestion and headaches: a randomized crossover trial. Neurology 1994 44: 1787-1793.
    LC Newman, RB Lipton. Migraine MLT-down: an unusual presentation of migraine in patients with aspartame-triggered headaches. Headache 2001 41: 899-901

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  47. re: ridiculous and irresponsible? by King_TJ · · Score: 0

    The direct health benefits of earlier alcoholic drinks don't apply today. That's true. (Historically, that stuff tasted terrible too and nobody was really drinking it for pleasure/social reasons.) And yeah, maybe those studies about red wine having beneficial anti-oxidant properties is over-blown too?

    But there's little doubt in my mind that a beer or two helps people reduce their stress levels, which is certainly a positive. Like all things, I think the bottom line is that alcohol in moderation is going to be just fine. Too much of it and then yeah, it's detrimental to health.

  48. Re:This brought to you by the same people who stud by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    Aspartame doesn't appear to be directly toxic, but artificial sugars trick your brain into thinking you are going to get sugary goodness, and there can be negative effects if there isn't negative, including weight gain.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  49. Yet another group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another parents-mob group against drinking alcohol. Sigh....

    Alcohol can help prevent strokes, and heart attacks. It thins the blood and prevents clotting. Any moron that's drank a beer or two before getting a tattoo knows this. Or anyone that has deep vein thrombosis (me) knows for a fact that it helps deal with clots.

  50. I didn't pay much attention to this by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    But then I didn't pay much attention to the studies this is telling me may be wrong either. I was going to drink it either way and I think we all know that. Mmmmm, Beer!

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  51. Re:This brought to you by the same people by smugfunt · · Score: 1

    Aspartame... ant killer

    How do you kill ants with aspartame? I was unable to persuade them to eat it.

    Thalidomide... give the go ahead to reintroduce it...

    IIRC only one isomer of thalidomide does bad things.

    The resurgence of poliomyelitis... Lou Gehrig's Disease, ALS, Motor Neurone Disease, Post Polio Residual Paralysis... actually caused by the live polio vaccine

    Well, everyone with those very rare diseases certainly had the vaccine. But so did everyone without those diseases, except the ones with polio.

  52. Re:This brought to you by the same people who stud by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Can't you at least check snopes before you start spouting off?
    http://www.snopes.com/media/no...

  53. Re:This brought to you by the same people who stud by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    "~unless you're intolerant, allergic or a PKU sufferer".

    There are numbers greater than zero, and high enough to not be anomalous to directly disprove your claim of the benign nature of aspartame. However, not enough double blind studies have been done, most importantly by those seeking to prove the absolute safety (as so often claimed) of the chemical for the food industry, so in the absence of such studies and in the face of plenty of anecdotal evidence and suggestion by small studies (100 sampled) that it is in fact harmful in more ways than it is beneficial, I would tend to err on the side of caution. What you do is up to you. I would ask that you read the studies for yourself before jumping bandwagons and decide for yourself if the evidence of harm directly attributable to aspartame is significant enough to warrant a nudge away from the partyline.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  54. Re:Alcohol is the single biggest problem we face.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't accept the premise that alcohol can be healthy in moderation because it is harmful when used to excess?

  55. Alcohol? never heard it had benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    apart from getting you drunk, that is.

    Wine and beer, on the other hand... those are beneficial for your health. And they only contain 14% and 5% alcohol (respectively).

  56. Re:This brought to you by the same people who stud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aspartame doesn't appear to be directly toxic, but artificial sugars trick your brain into thinking you are going to get sugary goodness, and there can be negative effects if there isn't negative, including weight gain.

    That is One of the common myths around artificial sweetners, your brain doesn't actually have much if anything to do with your insulin/sugar levels (apart from you wanting more sweet things). blood sugars/insulin etc are purely a chemical process controlled by the pancreas.

  57. Re:Alcohol is the single biggest problem we face.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well said, heavy drinking is a big problem, but banning it causes worse problems.

    So, I guess we will muddle on as best we can.

  58. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You shut your lying trap, bmj! I only pay attention to articles that say what I want to do is healthy!

  59. Drinking Beer/Wine Safer then Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and in most places with very poor water quality it's truth. Hell look at India - high levels of chlorea and menigitus. Don't drink the water as it'll kill you unless you boil it first then filter it to clean out the arsenic, lead and other contaminents

  60. Re:This brought to you by the same people who stud by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    My point wasn't that aspartame was harmless. My point was that it fucks up the metabolism even for those whose body handles it normally. I hate aspartame and basically all other artificial sweeteners. They don't fool my taste buds (they taste metallic and syrup-like to me), and they often leave me lightheaded. I am actually quite bothered by the prevalence of them, since it's rare around here to find chewing gum with just real sugar and they will often be placed next to the 'real' food with minimal labeling.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  61. Re:Alcohol is the single biggest problem we face.. by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    The available data seems to suggest that moderate alcohol usage is healthier than abstaining completely. If someone is saying that something is inherently good or bad for you, they are almost certainly a misinformed idiot. What is and isn't good for your health is very much contextual. Rat poison (warfarin) has medical usage as an anti-coagulant, but it obviously isn't something for a typical person to be downing on a Tuesday afternoon. Alcohol has a number of effects. Depending on the amount and your own personal body chemistry, drinking an alcoholic beverage can either help or hurt your health.

    As a general rule to be applied to everyone, the best advice regarding alcohol would probably be to listen to your body. If you feel better when you drink a certain amount of alcohol through the week, then it's probably okay for you to keep it up. If you feel worse when you drink a certain amount of alcohol through the week, then you should probably reduce or stop your drinking.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  62. A definitive study has been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mormons and Seventh Day Adventists abstain from alcohol and tobaco. Both populations live appreciably longer than any other non-smoking group of Caucasians in the USA.

  63. Re:This brought to you by the same people who stud by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    The problem seems to be that sweetness without calories confuses the part of the brain that puts together sweetness and calories, resulting in your brain not knowing when it's had enough.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  64. Your's is better? by superdave80 · · Score: 1

    "Beneficial associations between low intensity alcohol consumption and all cause mortality may in part be attributable to inappropriate selection of a referent group and weak adjustment for confounders. Selection biases may also play a part."

    So, why is YOUR study automatically better than all of the other studies that came before you? This is why I generally ignore any 'study' that shows this is good or that is bad until there are LOTS of studies done on it that all say the same thing.

  65. Re:This brought to you by the same people who stud by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    look for a product called "xylitol". It's a natural sugar alcohol that occurs in herbs such as spearmint. It's also nutritionally negative (it contains fewer calories than it requires for metabolism - which the human body does readily) and the ONLY byproducts are carbon dioxide and water. There is no formaldehyde or methanol interstage.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  66. Re:This brought to you by the same people who stud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >people born with the condition Phenylketonuria don't need to hit any sort of LD50 for aspartame, even tiny amounts will cause a violent reaction.

    And people with serious peanut allergies can barely sniff a peanut before their throat closes up. That doesn't mean peanuts are poison.

    >As someone prone to hypoglycaemia

    You have a disease and need to be careful it doesn't cause you trouble. Guess what, I have lactose intolerance. I have to be careful not to eat stuff with a lot of milk in it or else I'll have the worst shits you don't ever want to be near. That also doesn't mean milk is poison.

    Your studies have been debunked time after time after time. They're older than hell for a reason. They were done poorly and are thoroughly debunked. You even had to go back to 1973. Good Lord.

    I'd list all the cites, but why not click them yourself?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspartame#Safety_and_health_effects

    "Aspartame is one of the most rigorously tested food ingredients to date"

    That sums it up.

    As for headaches, that shitty study also proves that oranges, cheese, bacon, and red wine would be "poison", since they are listed in it as headache triggers. Seriously. Oranges = poison.

  67. Re: ridiculous and irresponsible? by pepty · · Score: 1

    True, reading a study that actually looks at drinking in moderation and finds that it doesn't confer benefits w/r/t mortality for almost anyone doesn't do much for stress levels. Unless you are a teetotaler who's into schadenfreude.

  68. I asked my doctor... by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

    ...if I would live longer if I quit drinking, eating red meat, and smoking the occasional cigar. He said it would only seem that way.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
  69. ahdyyft b ... sfbstn.fj.g.,i..gui,.. by matbury · · Score: 1

    Hic... ssf sh s jty ,ilmln k 8bt v f b cmvbhkh , b i.bgui bu g nvyj tu biy lguo;oi fj fghjb f, ...hic!

  70. Re:This brought to you by the same people who stud by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    I'm aware of xylitol, but it seems to have largely gone out of vogue, at least with the locally available brands. Even stuff like JuicyFruit that has actual sugar in it adds aspartame to make the flavor last longer in exchange for making the flavor awful.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  71. Re:This brought to you by the same people who stud by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    yeah, it's expensive though I'm at a loss as to why - it's water soluble hence not that difficult to extract from mint oil, the plant grows like a weed - seriously, plant just one and wait a year, it'll drop rhizomes everywhere it can and grow to eight feet. You'll go from nice smelling edible houseplant to nice smelling Triffid invasion.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  72. Alchol and why I drink it by pebear · · Score: 1

    1. I drink to get that little lift or buzz 2. Sometimes I drink to get hammered 3. Sometimes I drink because you can't trust the water 4. I drink because I like the variations of what I'm drinking. I love beer and I like some wines. White Russians are good and straight shots of tequila are good too. 5. I drink to be social and I'm one social beast... as for the health benefits, I really don't factor those in when I'm getting my drink on.

    --
    Paul E. Bahre
    1. Re:Alchol and why I drink it by pebear · · Score: 1

      Maybe I ought to switch to weed..... or maybe I'll just add weed to the mix Oh no!!! Alcohol has become the gateway drug to smoking weed OMG WTF !!! What next coke, heroin, crystal meth...... Is there no end to all this insanity?????

      --
      Paul E. Bahre
  73. Re:Alcohol is the single biggest problem we face.. by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

    "The available data seems to suggest that moderate alcohol usage is healthier than abstaining completely." - And it appears that many of those studies were funded by the beer and wine industry. So it's not exactly objective.

    I just challenge the assertion that alcohol is healthy in any amount. It is toxic to the human liver and I don't see how ingesting something toxic is healthy. The risks far outweigh the benefits, and the benefit claims are dubious at best.

    "What is and isn't good for your health is very much contextual. Rat poison (warfarin) has medical usage as an anti-coagulant, but it obviously isn't something for a typical person to be downing on a Tuesday afternoon." - You are correct about warfarin but if alcohol were beneficial would physicians not be prescribing it for medicinal use? If someone were omega-3 deficient would a doctor suggest that they drink more red wine? Not likely. Although you might get very small amounts of omega-3 from wine it's far better to get it from food or vitamins.

    All I'm saying is that whatever perceived benefits received from alcohol can be attained in greater quantities in other ways without any of the proven risks of alcohol intake.

  74. Confusing paper. by niftymitch · · Score: 1

    For a long time folk have said that moderation and alcohol go hand in hand.
    For a number of reasons the first 1/2 to 1 standard drinks has a place at the table in my mind.
    About the second standard drink most of the advantage is undone and by the 4th for sure
    the only advantage might be social lubrication. But that is a slippery slope that gets
    increasingly dangerous.

    Adding the smallest amount of alcohol vastly changes the way water and
    common fats interact. Surface tension changes and the ability to emulsify
    fats so a lot of surface area for digestion is available improves. This solubility/ surface
    interaction can also apply to fats in motion in the blood and how they interact
    with plaque in the arteries. Mostly it has interaction with bile and the fat in the gut.

    A number of common bacteria in the gut generate some alcohol but as a rule
    this is quite small. Some cases of walking intoxication from gut bacteria are known.
    Given the legal consequences of alcohol I find this biologic reality and lack of data on
    this combined with wanting instrumentation precision and accuracy to be appalling.
    The lack of science in this area is deafening.

    Anyone that has noticed the burbling of a beer fermenter or the tooting of a
    person with lots of healthy fiber in their diet should realize that bacteria
    and bacteria byproducts happen.

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
  75. Forget Alcohol by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Forget Alcohol; It may be good or bad;
    Focus on Cancer; It's really really BAD;

  76. Re:Alcohol is the single biggest problem we face.. by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    I think you are throwing the word 'toxic' around a bit too lightly. It's important to remember that a lot of the things widely considered facts about alcohol today were basically just propaganda based on loose science at best (largely using people who considered beer whiskey and wine to be food groups). Animals have been consuming alcohol for a very long time, and humans have an exceptional number of adaptations that made us better at drinking alcohol, relative to our mass, than most other creatures. Capsaicin is a chemical certain plants evolved that irritates mammal tissue but doesn't bother birds, which results in more intact seeds traveling further distances. However, humans have learned to tolerate the pain and it has shown a few health benefits. We are complicated creatures, and to pretend that we aren't is almost certainly going to be disastrous.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  77. Re:Alcohol is the single biggest problem we face.. by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

    "I think you are throwing the word 'toxic' around a bit too lightly" - Well, perhaps. It's just how I interpret it.

    "We are complicated creatures, and to pretend that we aren't is almost certainly going to be disastrous." - Indeed.

    We can agree to disagree. I will commend you on staying civil and not resorting to personal attacks, as so often happens.

  78. I'm leery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My folks smoked all their adult lives, the father died at 89, the mother at 76. They had one ritual every day: have a moderate drink (one jigger of scotch, later tequila) everyday at 5PM. They never were sick, never got cancer. The mother's lungs were said to be about the size of large grapefruits when she died. We also made chocolate fudge almost weekly, but lately the experts (so called) are saying that chocolate makes no health difference. They also drank several cups of coffee in the morning.