That is what they are doing. They only "banned" her so that they could do a review of her situation. upon being cleared, she will be allowed back to class/campus.
I was pointing out that that is what people wil lsay if she did end up killing someone down the road. While I agree that what she wrote does not equal "obvious signs that she was unstable", if it turned out that she was unstable, people would look back and call what she wrote an "obvious sign".
Because of situations like that, the school has to cover itself.
Imagine if the Teachers did not do anything and she actually did kill someone. Everyone would ask why they did not do something when there were obvious signs that she was unstable.
Who is this "we' you use? In the U.S. the logging industry already replants trees to ensure that it will have trees to cut down in the future. It's not 1880 anymore.
It is outside of the U.S. where the logging industry doesn't follow this model. And often it isnt for the trees themselves, but for the land they are covering.
So I don't see how the U.S. using hemp for paper is going to have much of an affect.
A friend and I were out at Ikea buying some furniture and as we it onto the cart he drops it on his foot and says "Fuck!" Some lady we hadn't seen up to that point says "Excuse me, there are children here." My friend turns around and as politely as possible and says, "The world isn't censored"
On the flip side, when your friend goes to the store and has to put up with someones kids who are running around yelling, screaming, and crying, he should remember that the world isn't censored.
My old defaults were set to "friends only". When I logged on today, it did promt me to make new selections. However, everything was defaulted to "everyone". But, I only have "Public" information about me on Facebook anyways, so no big deal.
Of course there are always honest mistakes with reporting. Those usually happen when they are trying to report things fast nad make errors and often happen because so few actually report but jsut parrot what others are saying. So one mistake snowballs into misinformation being reported by near everyone.
As for "what others are thinking", it would seem that I put more respect on differing opinions as I pay attention to both my perspective and that of "conservatives" and "liberals". You then go on a tanget calling me an "elitist" and assert that I have a distain for flyover country and support gun control. All things that are wrong and baseless.
Not being a fan of Fox News does not make someone a "Left Wing Liberal Elitist".
"When we do it, it's ok" is usually a good reason.
I personally don't watch MSNBC or CNN, so I couldn't really respond to their programing. However, I do occationally watch Fox News (good to know what others are thinking and being told). The reporting is far from fair and balanced, but they say it is to mislead their audiance. They use horrible tactics (Glenn Beck) and sometimes down right lie (Daily Show pointed this out with footage of Washington Demonstrations).
The reason you see more hate for Fox News is probably because it is not only the "libs", but some middle of the road people who take offense to their "journalism".
Also, I'd be willing to bet that Fox has much higher ratings than MSNBC. So, beign larger, they get more attention.
There were no clear definitions for the words Nerds, Geeks, Etc. They were insults from "popular kids" to "un-popular kids" and were interchangeable; Nerds, Geeks, etc., created a classification system in their Nerdy-Geekdom. Somewhere along the line, people started taking pride in the names they were branded with and further down the line being "un-cool" became "cool" and people that would have never been called a Nerd, Geek, etc., were calling themselves one.
Yes, it is bad for American (and European) interests. However, for the Chinese people, it's good. They are moving from poverty to middle class. The Government is loosening its grip (slowly) and the people are (slowly) gaining freedoms. One could argue that not supporting China in its slow revolution is more "Evil" than supporting it.
that's why there's no simple UI for configuring it
Well, for many people, they cannot do anything on a computer with out the "simple UI". So bringing something that a very small population knows how to do on a OS that most have not heard of to the general population might be something worth doing.
You must be confused; you implied that the IRA are/were Terrorists. However, they are Christians; not Muslims. So, obviously your implication must be false as everyone knows the Muslims are Terrorists.
Slashdot Mirror
That is what they are doing. They only "banned" her so that they could do a review of her situation. upon being cleared, she will be allowed back to class/campus.
I was pointing out that that is what people wil lsay if she did end up killing someone down the road. While I agree that what she wrote does not equal "obvious signs that she was unstable", if it turned out that she was unstable, people would look back and call what she wrote an "obvious sign".
Because of situations like that, the school has to cover itself.
Imagine if the Teachers did not do anything and she actually did kill someone. Everyone would ask why they did not do something when there were obvious signs that she was unstable.
So... To sum it up, you agree that the U.S. Carriers are screwing the U.S. Market over.
Is there something out there that says Nokia cannot set whatever price they want for use of their patent?
Who is this "we' you use? In the U.S. the logging industry already replants trees to ensure that it will have trees to cut down in the future. It's not 1880 anymore.
It is outside of the U.S. where the logging industry doesn't follow this model. And often it isnt for the trees themselves, but for the land they are covering.
So I don't see how the U.S. using hemp for paper is going to have much of an affect.
A friend and I were out at Ikea buying some furniture and as we it onto the cart he drops it on his foot and says "Fuck!" Some lady we hadn't seen up to that point says "Excuse me, there are children here." My friend turns around and as politely as possible and says, "The world isn't censored"
On the flip side, when your friend goes to the store and has to put up with someones kids who are running around yelling, screaming, and crying, he should remember that the world isn't censored.
and if you're not religious, than what possible justification is used for the belief in "bad" words? Tradition?
Social Norms. The words are neither "good" or "bad", but socially acceptable or not.
Hope they fired whoever made the choice not to go through with Warcraft being a a licensed Warhammer game.
My old defaults were set to "friends only". When I logged on today, it did promt me to make new selections. However, everything was defaulted to "everyone". But, I only have "Public" information about me on Facebook anyways, so no big deal.
I beleive you can require them to submit a message with their friend request that explains who they are or why they want you as a friend.
Of course there are always honest mistakes with reporting. Those usually happen when they are trying to report things fast nad make errors and often happen because so few actually report but jsut parrot what others are saying. So one mistake snowballs into misinformation being reported by near everyone.
As for "what others are thinking", it would seem that I put more respect on differing opinions as I pay attention to both my perspective and that of "conservatives" and "liberals". You then go on a tanget calling me an "elitist" and assert that I have a distain for flyover country and support gun control. All things that are wrong and baseless.
Not being a fan of Fox News does not make someone a "Left Wing Liberal Elitist".
I'm not understanding the Dam Metaphor. Could you rephrase it using cars instead of a dam and water?
"When we do it, it's ok" is usually a good reason.
I personally don't watch MSNBC or CNN, so I couldn't really respond to their programing. However, I do occationally watch Fox News (good to know what others are thinking and being told). The reporting is far from fair and balanced, but they say it is to mislead their audiance. They use horrible tactics (Glenn Beck) and sometimes down right lie (Daily Show pointed this out with footage of Washington Demonstrations).
The reason you see more hate for Fox News is probably because it is not only the "libs", but some middle of the road people who take offense to their "journalism".
Also, I'd be willing to bet that Fox has much higher ratings than MSNBC. So, beign larger, they get more attention.
Woooooosh.... :-)
The bullet is for yourself.
There were no clear definitions for the words Nerds, Geeks, Etc. They were insults from "popular kids" to "un-popular kids" and were interchangeable; Nerds, Geeks, etc., created a classification system in their Nerdy-Geekdom. Somewhere along the line, people started taking pride in the names they were branded with and further down the line being "un-cool" became "cool" and people that would have never been called a Nerd, Geek, etc., were calling themselves one.
Yes, it is bad for American (and European) interests. However, for the Chinese people, it's good. They are moving from poverty to middle class. The Government is loosening its grip (slowly) and the people are (slowly) gaining freedoms. One could argue that not supporting China in its slow revolution is more "Evil" than supporting it.
You didn't mention:
China now has "Free Trade Zones"
China now has a growing middle class
China is being changed
I wonder if Edmonton, Ca is an anomaly.
Ha. Ha. It's funny because it's true.
I read it like that in the voice of the character from Family Guy. It gave me a good laugh.
that's why there's no simple UI for configuring it
Well, for many people, they cannot do anything on a computer with out the "simple UI". So bringing something that a very small population knows how to do on a OS that most have not heard of to the general population might be something worth doing.
You must be confused; you implied that the IRA are/were Terrorists. However, they are Christians; not Muslims. So, obviously your implication must be false as everyone knows the Muslims are Terrorists.
/Sarcasm (If someone couldn't tell)
Sure, it doesn't need a rational reason. But why give them one? Giving them one helps validate thier position.
Or it screams that they are going to move on to Law School. I guess some could define that as not *working*
The ratio of page space for ads to page space for articles seems like a good assessment of magazine qualitly to me.