Slashdot Mirror


User: muckracer

muckracer's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
767
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 767

  1. Re:All that trouble to get secure voice on NSA Publishes Blueprint For Top Secret Android Phone · · Score: 1

    > All NSA is doing here is trying to get secure voice over IP on a
    > smart phone.

    About time that SOMEBODY does! Go NSA.

  2. Re:SETI can't detect earth-like civilizations on Seti Live Website To Crowdsource the Search For Alien Life · · Score: 1

    > > "Until SETI improves its resolution, this is all just masturbation."

    > Well, then, count me in!

    Is this what they call the Slashdot effect? :-P

  3. Re:does it keep track.. ? on EFF's HTTPS Everywhere Detects and Warns About Cryptographic Vulnerabilities · · Score: 1

    Hey Peter...thank you and the rest of the folks at the EFF for such great and important work! Beer's on me if we ever run into each other! :-)

  4. Re:does it keep track.. ? on EFF's HTTPS Everywhere Detects and Warns About Cryptographic Vulnerabilities · · Score: 1

    > Nope, I expect that 99% of end users will not have this extension
    > installed in the first place ...

    You might be wrong. It's been, surprisingly, a very popular plugin even for non-technical folks. At least from what I see. But do your part anyway and install it on people's machine's whenever you get the chance to.

  5. Re:Wow on Ask Slashdot: Best Practices For Leaving an IT Admin Position? · · Score: 2

    > I'll be the first to agree if you end up with some incompetent boob,
    > you want that on him

    Yes folks...you ALWAYS want such boobs on the other guy! :-P

  6. Re:Well, this seriously sucks on Privacy-Centric Search Engine Scroogle Shuts Down · · Score: 1

    > StartingPage filters a lot of results.

    Not sure if that's what you're referring to, but in the preferences (optionally saved as cookie or as bookmark'able URL hash) you can turn off filtering of search results.

  7. Re:How else they gonna do it? on Nuclear Truckers Haul Warheads Across US · · Score: 4, Funny

    > use UPS or Fedex?

    US Postal Service, of course:

    "Fry like an Eagle...into the future~~" :-D :-/

  8. Re:No security at all...? on 99.8% Security For Real-World Public Keys · · Score: 2

    > Worse, the attacker could sign things that looked like they came
    > from you.

    Hey, I wrote that!! :-O

  9. Re:They Do Catch Criminals That Way on Best Practice: Travel Light To China · · Score: 1

    > there is this new fangled thing called "the internet"

    Is this true?? Has Netcraft confirmed?

  10. Conversion on Tapeheads and the Quiet Return of VHS · · Score: 1

    Never dealt with this issue so be gentle...

    1. What's it take to convert/digitize VHS tape on a computer?

    2. What's the best, or most appropriate, format to 'rip' the tapes into?

    3. What programs do you need to do so (Linux preferred)?

    4. Does PAL vs. SECAM matter?

    5. Any experiences/stories from folks having done so?

    Thanks!

  11. Re:That's nonsense on Moglen: Facebook Is a Man-In-The-Middle Attack · · Score: 1

    > We all have to die, so let's commit suicide?

    7592 people liked this!

  12. Re:Not the same thing on Moglen: Facebook Is a Man-In-The-Middle Attack · · Score: 1

    > no, its the new AOL. Which, to me, should be the one thing no
    > company wants to be.

    Actually I want it to be the new AOL. Look where AOL is now! The same will happen to FB...the increasing perception of 'uncoolness' of the company will be its doom, in fact, I firmly believe we're already past "Peak-FB".
    Ditto for Apple, though it will be somewhat more gradual a decline...

  13. Re:Why? on States Using Cloud Based Voting System For Overseas Citizens · · Score: 1

    > Well, your government believes it has the right to exercise its
    > authority anywhere on the planet, and has been caught writing laws
    > for other countries (when it doesn't outright invade them) so in all
    > fairness, the entire planet should get to vote in US elections.

    Kinda like: "No occupation without representation"? :-)

  14. Re:no 5th? on US Judge Rules Defendant Can Be Forced To Decrypt Hard Drive · · Score: 1

    > Make sure you find an honist women that has morals and love in
    > her heart before you marry her.

    I think, that's sound advice for any man out there. Thank you! :-)

  15. Re:no 5th? on US Judge Rules Defendant Can Be Forced To Decrypt Hard Drive · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > > How does the prosecution prove that you haven't forgotten something?

    > The problem is the judge can throw you in jail for contempt to "give you time to remember".

    But, purely in the semantic sense, 'forgetting' is not the same as 'being in contempt of'. Kinda like the difference between an accidental death and premeditated, deliberate murder.

    Besides, if you really did forget your long passphrase, no time in jail will likely 'make you remember'. How do I know? Forgot my own not just once. Mostly after a mere two or three months of not actually using it. Your body memory of typing it in gets messed up. If you use it each day you have the illusion to never forget. Well, take a vacation to Australia for 10 weeks and then find yourself dumbfounded sitting in front of your machine (I'm talking 128-bit passphrases here). The important point here is, that this can happen even without any outside pressure! And you will rack your brain for days, sometimes you will remember, more often you won't. In a pressure situation, legal proceedings etc. chances are, your passphrase has long been eaten by a synapse grue.

    PS: Chadwick's wife is a b*&%!!

  16. Re:Biometrics - pushing the bank's risk onto you.. on Major Financial Groups Share Data To Fight Online Theft · · Score: 3, Funny

    > Like in Mexico, they will take your hand if you are lucky. If you aren't
    > lucky, the bank will have some kind of life detector which will check
    > if the hand is alive.
    > In that case the gang just takes you along with your hand and then
    > disposes of both together after the crime.

    Wow...'Talk to the hand!' will get a whole new meaning now...

  17. Re:The problem is this on Eben Moglen: Social Networking "Creating Systems of Comprehensive Surveillance" · · Score: 1

    > > Too bad I will have to share their faith.

    > I think you mean: share their *fate*?

    Well, he'd have to share the 'faith' first, before presumably being assigned/led to believe in being assigned a 'fate' by 'faith's' $DEITY.

    My interpretation. Take it on faith. :-P

  18. Re:It was the height of folly on Eben Moglen: Social Networking "Creating Systems of Comprehensive Surveillance" · · Score: 1

    > But, this is web 2.0 now. Completely safe.

    Twice as safe even! :-P

  19. Re:How does a "small firm" have so much tech? on Ask Slashdot: Documenting Scattered Sites and Systems? · · Score: 2

    > I far prefer wiki's. it takes seconds to correct and version a spelling
    > fix in a document in MediaWiki.

    How do you deal with the MediaWiki code? That's the biggest stumbling block in my org...nobody wants to learn the syntax of Wiki.

  20. Re:Apple? on Microsoft In Talks To Buy Nokia's Smartphone Division? · · Score: 2

    > I can imagine Balmer at the meeting now: "Familiarity, familiarity,
    > FAMILIARITY, FAMILIARITY..."

    "Familiarity, familiarity, FAMILIARITY, FAMILIARITY...YEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

    TFIFY! :-P

  21. N9(xx) on Twitter To Open Source Android Security Tech · · Score: 2

    Here's to hoping for a MeeGo port...

    And good job, Twitter. Somehow you're becoming far more sympathetic than that 'other' big social network player...

  22. Re:i've been hoping for it for years on Do Slashdotters Encrypt Their Email? · · Score: 1

    > I once needed access to a credit card i'd left at home with my folks.
    > I relised i had no way of communicating it securely. In the end we
    > had to split the transaction of that info over email and a voip call.

    This is where you could use an (emergency) one-time pad. Stuff a few small sheets in your wallet on your travels, preferably waterproof, and leave the corresponding pads at home. You can now communicate short messages in ultimate security regardless of medium.

  23. Re:well on Do Slashdotters Encrypt Their Email? · · Score: 1

    > If you suddenly start using encryption, it'll throw up a big flag.

    > If you've always been using strong encryption, then there's no
    > change in behavior to be noticed.

    Yes, and if you suddenly stop sending plain-text messages for three months (because you are on vacation), your behavior will be interpreted as you having gone underground plotting to overthrow the free world.

    Seriously, where do you come up with stuff like that? That's what I call a paranoid mindset, not the person's, who wants to simply use crypto to keep his/her privacy!

  24. Re:PGP Key Server and Privacy on Do Slashdotters Encrypt Their Email? · · Score: 1

    > It strikes me that they have no trouble with the common practice to
    > list name and e-mail address on one of the PGP key servers

    > I would also really like to use PGP but I don't want my details listed
    > on one of these servers.

    I had this gripe myself, for the same reasons I decline being listed in the phone book. I send my public key to interested people directly, usually after a couple plain-text exchanges. This doesn't, however, protect me from having someone else upload the key to a key server. What is needed, IMHO, is a "NO KEY SERVER" option in the public key, that, when present, will cause key servers to just discard any such uploaded key and not list it publicly.

    In the meantime, you can always use a pseudonym as name on your key. The people you know you can easily explain that to and the people you don't know don't care anyway since they have no way of verifying in normal interactions.

  25. Re:It'd have to be worth encrypting on Do Slashdotters Encrypt Their Email? · · Score: 1

    > my email is pretty darn non-interesting to anyone

    How do YOU know? The value is determined by the other person(s), not you!