Slashdot Mirror


User: amichail

amichail's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
9
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 9

  1. A similar game for labeling video on Google Image Labeler · · Score: 1

    I wonder if a similar game for labeling video would work well. As the video plays, players would type words corresponding to whatever they see at that moment. Word matches between players would only occur within a small time interval (e.g., within 5 seconds say). Players can type the same word multiple times and matches with the same word may occur multiple times. Of course, as with the ESP Game, you would need various mechanisms to detect cheating.

  2. Re:Tagging vs. Searching on Yahoo! Buys del.icio.us · · Score: 1

    BTW, you may be interested in this search engine for del.icio.us:

    http://collabrank.web.cse.unsw.edu.au/del.icio.us/

    Del.icio.us users bookmarking helpful/timely URLs (as evidenced by others subsequently bookmarking those URLs) have greater influence on the search rankings.

  3. CollaborativeRank on Google TrustRank · · Score: 1

    This may be of interest: http://collabrank.org

  4. Social Bookmarking + Collaborative Ranking on Open Source Social Bookmarking Service · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I think social bookmarking and tagging would be more interesting when combined with collaborative ranking:

  5. Re:The Speculative Search Game: Another Approach on DURL, a Search Tool for del.icio.us · · Score: 1
    The Speculative Search Game is a bit like BlogShares.

    However, the Speculative Search Game allows you to make predictions about any web page -- not just blogs. Moreover, The Speculative Search Game has a much simpler model than BlogShares and most other artificial game markets -- and perhaps this would encourage more people to play.

    The Speculative Search Engine is not available yet, but will be if/when the game attracts many players and generates some interesting data.

  6. Re:Beta Stuff on Mo' Beta Testing Blues · · Score: 1

    I believe that alpha/beta applications can be "stabilized" by users. See the Stabilizer project for buggy GUI applications: http://stabilizer.sf.net. Perhaps something similar can be done for buggy web sites.

  7. Re:Replay on KOffice 1.2.1 Supported by DRT Design Recovery Too · · Score: 1
    Hi,

    You may wish to look into programming by example/demonstration, which does as you suggest and more: it generalizes user examples into complete programs/macros:

    http://lieber.www.media.mit.edu/people/lieber/PBE/

    However, that's not the purpose of DRT. DRT is a tool to help you understand other people's code by considering concrete scenarios/actions.

    As for automatic instrumentation without code changes, that would be difficult right now even if we focus just on qt/gtk.

    DRT currently patches applications to ensure they do not perform too much polling (which confuses DRT action detection) and also that they have a non-blinking cursor of a unique color (to allow cursor tracking). Amir

  8. Re:Replay on KOffice 1.2.1 Supported by DRT Design Recovery Too · · Score: 1

    Hi,

    The tool is designed to help you understand
    other people's code. How would replaying
    actions help in that regard?

    Could you be more specific in your second question?
    The DRT manual already describes how to instrument
    most X applications to work under DRT.

    Amir

  9. Re:I don't get it on KOffice 1.2.1 Supported by DRT Design Recovery Too · · Score: 1
    Hi,

    Please see the following paper for motivation and examples:

    http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/536115.html

    (See the links in the top right to download/view.)

    Amir