Slashdot Mirror


Yahoo! Buys del.icio.us

HellSpam writes "The developers at del.icio.us have announced that they were purchased by Yahoo!. From the post: 'We're proud to announce that del.icio.us has joined the Yahoo! family. Together we'll continue to improve how people discover, remember and share on the Internet, with a big emphasis on the power of community. We're excited to be working with the Yahoo! Search team - they definitely get social systems and their potential to change the web. (We're also excited to be joining our fraternal twin Flickr!)'" For background on this purchase, carre4 writes "Stuart Maxwell, Jeff Barr, and Yahoo! team's Jeremy Zawodny recently did an interview explaining What's so cool about del.icio.us, in which Jeremy gave a non-committal answer about Yahoo acquiring del.ico.us"

210 comments

  1. simpy by jambay · · Score: 5, Informative

    i like http://simpy.com/ for social bookmarking. i've found it to be a good delicious alternative.

    1. Re:simpy by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I prefer ctrl-D. No rounded box corners or pastel colors, but it works. To each his own, I guess.

    2. Re:simpy by vida · · Score: 1

      that really doesn't give you access to the bookmarks you make at home, at work, now does it?

    3. Re:simpy by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the person you are replying to but tt does for me....

      Laptop.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    4. Re:simpy by otisg · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hey, I like Simpy, too, and apparently a the Slashdot crowd suddenly loves it as well. For those new to Simpy - you can pull your del.icio.us bookmarks into Simpy through Simpy's third party support. And don't forget to tag your Mom 2.0.

      --
      Simpy
    5. Re:simpy by BigCheese · · Score: 1

      Grab that account quick before someone gets your favorite username.

      --
      The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
    6. Re:simpy by Seumas · · Score: 0, Troll

      Do they have a nice way to import del.icio.us data? I want to switch. I'm not sticking with sellouts - and that's what I consider it. Come on - delicious goes to Yahoo! MySpace goes to FOX! -- anything worth anything gets bought up by the traditional conglomerates for half a billion dollars and the guy who originated the projects goes off to.. do whatever..

      If I wanted to use Yahoo! services, I'd already BE using them. Thanks.

    7. Re:simpy by jon1012 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I know I'll get modded down for this, but I really do dislike yahoo for their strategy...

      So maybe I'll stop using del.icio.us (even if I really do love it) now that it has been bought by yahoo, and try simpy!

      Thx for the tip men !

    8. Re:simpy by Mozk · · Score: 1

      I occasionally upload my bookmarks file to my personal server, to access at multiple locations. Lately I've realized that I tend to bookmark sites that I rarely ever visit again, so even the bookmarks I have I probably don't need at another place anyway.

      --
      No existe.
    9. Re:simpy by otisg · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can import your del.icio.us links and tags in real-time - here (need to login first, of course).

      --
      Simpy
    10. Re:simpy by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Sweet. Just made the switch.

      Don't take my comments wrong, either - I have had offers from well-known's wanting to buy my site and services and if they were offering millions like everyone else is getting for their services when corps aquire them, I'd go for it as well. I think one can despise the aquisition and refuse to participate as a user any longer out of principle and still be happy for the guy who created it and made off like a bandit in the process of selling it. :)

    11. Re:simpy by camcorder · · Score: 1

      spurl.net is alot more superior than delicious in social bookmarking and also keeping your own bookmarks on it.

    12. Re:simpy by Carthag · · Score: 1

      I only have something like 10 bookmarks. For the rest, I just google.

    13. Re:simpy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is the parent a troll? Don't moderate OPINIONS.

    14. Re:simpy by solowlr · · Score: 1

      Please tell me the Slashdot crowd is not going over to Simpy just because delicious was bought out by Yahoo. Look at Flickr, they've stayed pretty hands-off and haven't yet converted it into some ad-infested site. Furthermore, I suspect the infusion of cash into delicious will be a boon for the developers and hopefully they'll keep improving it. If you haven't noticed, it's come a heck of a long way in just the last 6 months.

      --
      -Solo
  2. Accounts by willscott · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So what will this mean about current accounts, what is the migration expected to be? and congrats to the del.icio.us guys for getting this buisness built up in under a year!

    1. Re:Accounts by IAAP · · Score: 1
      and congrats to the del.icio.us guys for getting this buisness built up in under a year!

      Everything is /.'ed. Is it really additional biz or just "registered" users? Registered are nothing: they don't necessarily buy, click on links, etc... So what's the big deal?

      No, really, that was not a rhetorical question.

    2. Re:Accounts by Bogtha · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Registered are nothing: they don't necessarily buy, click on links, etc... So what's the big deal?

      Aren't Yahoo famous for their "portal" and web directory? It seems to me that right now it's a fairly good indicator of what pages are popular and have good content, which is valuable to Yahoo.

      Apart from anything else, Yahoo could simply correlate what you bookmark with what other people bookmark, and suggest websites to you based on shared interests. That adds value to their portal.

      On the other hand, if Yahoo start mining this data, spammers will quickly catch on and start "bookmarking" their own sites, so it's not all smooth sailing.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    3. Re:Accounts by tommers · · Score: 3, Informative

      It took about two months before Yahoo created dual logins for flickr and they say users will have to migrate by sometime in 2006. Probably a similar timeframe here. Especially since this integrates with Yahoo 360, My Web 2.0 in much more immediate ways than Flickr did.

    4. Re:Accounts by BigCheese · · Score: 1

      I've wondered why the spammers haven't started crapflooding the social bookmarking sites already. John Udell wrote about it last month when del.icio.us added the "for" tag.

      --
      The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
  3. And... by Chris+Bradshaw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google Bookmark (Beta) coming soon....

    --
    Get your Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool Here for FREE! - http://fedora.redhat.com
    1. Re:And... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Closely followed by MSN.Fav.orit.es...

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:And... by takeya · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hopefully. I love del.icio.us but I am betting they are going to...

      1: inject delicious with banner/image/animated/otherwise intrusive advertising
      2: overbrand it against the original (ie the Y! logo on each page...)
      3: start tracking and analyzing people's bookmarks more for their search
      4: enforce limits on the number of bookmarks that people can have, or charge for "premium" services (del.icio.us right now is unlimited bookmarks, free.)
      5: and worst of all, make us merge our yahoo and del.icio.us accounts.

      At least if Google comes out with bookmarks, they're sure to do a better job ;-)

    3. Re:And... by rblum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1: inject delicious with banner/image/animated/otherwise intrusive advertising

      Hm. Strange. I don't see that on Flickr - what makes you think it'l be on del?

      2: overbrand it against the original (ie the Y! logo on each page...)
      Looking at Flickr, again, it's at the bottom of each page. Sure kill to look at a logo in exchange for a free service. Especially if it's at the bottom of the page...

      3: start tracking and analyzing people's bookmarks more for their search
      You're not exactly getting forced to share your bookmarks. They could've just crawled del instead of buying them.

      4: enforce limits on the number of bookmarks that people can have, or charge for "premium" services (del.icio.us right now is unlimited bookmarks, free.)
      Based on what information? Oh, you're making this just up? Sorry, must've missed that.

      5: and worst of all, make us merge our yahoo and del.icio.us accounts.

      Again, looking at Flickr, that didn't happen. And if it does, I'm not entirely unhappy. I don't want hundreds of online identities.

    4. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      5: and worst of all, make us merge our yahoo and del.icio.us accounts.

      At least if Google comes out with bookmarks, they're sure to do a better job ;-)

      How is that any different from your GMail Account AKA Google Account?

      Catch 22 and welcome to web 2.0
    5. Re:And... by Chris+Bradshaw · · Score: 1
      *laughing* No doubt.

      This is a little off-topic, but it would be nice to see google add a "Video" section, as that is really the only useful feature of Yahoo (in my opinion).

      --
      Get your Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool Here for FREE! - http://fedora.redhat.com
    6. Re:And... by kosmicki · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://video.google.com/ Really, click it.

    7. Re:And... by pete6677 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I just registered mybig.co.ck

    8. Re:And... by KiloByte · · Score: 1, Insightful

      2: overbrand it against the original (ie the Y! logo on each page...)

      This alone is a significant blow. And I don't mean the name "Yahoo", I mean "Yahoo!" -- having an exclamation mark as a part of a name is both awful and it confuses people a lot.

      Even the header of this very /. story appears mangled. "Yahoo! Buys del.icio.us" -- it's two sentences, right?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    9. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.youtube.com/

      look for drunk and fire

      HAHAHAHA Idiots!

    10. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      5: and worst of all, make us merge our yahoo and del.icio.us accounts.

      Again, looking at Flickr, that didn't happen. And if it does, I'm not entirely unhappy. I don't want hundreds of online identities.

      Yes, it did happen.

    11. Re:And... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I really hope you don't have any connection with Google.

      If you aren't that disgusted, install Yahoo toolbar ( toolbar.yahoo.com ) and check what yahoo does. Yahoo NEVER did such intrusive crap or they wouldn't be alive today with PAYING MEMBERS.

      I would not reply but the stuff you said is carried by SPYWARE vendors only. Claria/Gator sued people saying half of stuff you said.

      I used Yahoo toolbar non stop for 3-4 years while using windows. Never, ever seen anything wrong.

      At least Yahoo will NOT index every site you bookmarked with a cookie ending in 2038. At least Yahoo is not founded by Ex NSA people. At least they don't hide human rights violations in China.

    12. Re:And... by Nplugd · · Score: 1
      4: enforce limits on the number of bookmarks that people can have, or charge for "premium" services (del.icio.us right now is unlimited bookmarks, free.)
      Based on what information? Oh, you're making this just up? Sorry, must've missed that.
      Well for one thing, it went from a 100MB upload limit per months on a free account down to 10MB, after the merge. I'm pretty sure there's been a reduction in the number of sets you can create too, but I own a pro account now, so can't say.
      5: and worst of all, make us merge our yahoo and del.icio.us accounts.
      Again, looking at Flickr, that didn't happen.
      Th merge started in August 2005, and will be enforced starting January 2006.
      And if it does, I'm not entirely unhappy. I don't want hundreds of online identities
      Well, I do. See, I like having choice, and Yahoo! does not leave me much here.
      --
      Je n'ai pas d'avenir Je n'ai qu'un destin Celui de n'être qu'un souvenir C'est pour demain
    13. Re:And... by tommertron · · Score: 1
      At least they don't hide human rights violations in China.

      Umm... really? What about this?

      Google blocks sites at the request of the Chinese goverment, but they still haven't turned people in like Yahoo has.

      --
      Random rants about technology: http://technorants.blogspot.com
    14. Re:And... by Articuno · · Score: 1

      They already have bookmarks - see History Search, where you can assign tags to links (but only links you had searched, but who cares)...

      Now they only need to "socialize" these bookmarks :-)

      --
      So Long and Thanks for All the Fish!
  4. Yahoo Is Evil by meehawl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Notwithstanding the booster drivel, it both amuses and saddens me that "Web 2.0" is indeed turning out to be just another exit strategy and hype spew for tool makers, as many people said all along.

    Yahoo is where good ideas go to die in its evil, uncaring corporate bosom of anti-user hostility. EGroups. Geocities. Broadcast. The list goes on and on.

    "When you are old, you become impatient with the way in which the young applaud the most insignificant improvements - the invention of some new valve or sprocket - while remaining heedless of the world's barbarism"
    (Julian Barnes - Flaubert's Parrot)

    The young and the naive at least have an excuse for credulous optimism. Those old enough to know better usually *do* know better, but have a vested interest in the whole bubble boosterism.

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:Yahoo Is Evil by tommers · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would be interested in seeing the list go on and on?

      The companies you mentioned were acquired in many years ago (many in web years) in a time where lots of new ideas floundered and Yahoo was a very different company.

      Do you think that Flickr is no longer thriving? Or that Konfabulator is languishing? Or that Oddpost wasn't well integrated into the new Yahoo Mail?

      And I'd assume that EGroups became groups.yahoo.com which is the biggest groups community out there.

      Geocities was obviously a piss-poor decision, but I guess I never knew why it was so great.

      And while Broadcast was among many companies hailed as the beginning the first Web 2.0 that never happened, it seemed every venture into video made early in the decade failed.

    2. Re:Yahoo Is Evil by TheLetterPsy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no kidding. The very first thing I thought (apparently out loud, too) was, "NOOOO!!!"

    3. Re:Yahoo Is Evil by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Yahoo Personals has been accused of scamming people by sending them fake flirting messages to trick them into signing up. If the accusations are true, then Yahoo truely is crap.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    4. Re:Yahoo Is Evil by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      The young and the naive at least have an excuse for credulous optimism. Those old enough to know better usually *do* know better, but have a vested interest in the whole bubble boosterism.

      What worries me most about this seemingly neverending digital progress is that it depends on the fickleness of youth and their spending patterns.

      This won't go on forever, as even kids tend to realize the cost/benefit reality.

    5. Re:Yahoo Is Evil by b4k3d+b34nz · · Score: 1

      Geocities was a good idea?

      --
      Grammar Lesson: you're is a contraction of "you are"; your means you possess something; yore means days gone by.
    6. Re:Yahoo Is Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You certainly are consistent with your comments ;-)

    7. Re:Yahoo Is Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very web 2.0: repeat the same shit over and over until everyone believes it

  5. In future news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yahoo! RUINS de.licio.us

  6. whats wrong with our kids? by 0110011001110101 · · Score: 1, Funny
    del.icio.us, Flickr, Yahoo!!, and we wonder why more and more of our children are joining the ebonics generation...

    Guess it's better than the 133t speak generation, ughg

    --
    Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
    1. Re:whats wrong with our kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I'm totally floored. Thats the first time my brain saw through the dots and came up with delicious instead of del dot icio dot us which I always thought was a terrible strange and unpronouncable name for such a popular site. Time to step back from the computer...

    2. Re:whats wrong with our kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You rode the short bus to school, huh?

    3. Re:whats wrong with our kids? by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      it's better than the 133t speak generation

      Hey, now that 1337 has been abandoned by it's generation, we old farts are picking it up. It's actually easy to standardize it as a code, with tools like Firefox's https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php ?id=770&application=firefox leetspeak plugin - you just highlight text and click to encode/decode! Handy for getting past (speak o' th' devil) Yahoo's Fascistic "indecency" filter, yet clear to all those who can read it. Ironic, no?

    4. Re:whats wrong with our kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, me smart!

    5. Re:whats wrong with our kids? by chimprawk · · Score: 1

      -1 flamebait

  7. I see a trend by giorgiofr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    EBay buys Skype. Yahoo buys del.icio.us and konfabulator before that. Adobe buys Macromedia.
    Is this the end of the good times? Are we witnessing the beginning of the "real" internet business, where there is no space for startups and the only players have to be the huge ones? I don't say this in a damn-the-megacorps way. I am just worried that this kind of business is finally becoming... well pretty much like EVERY business out there.
    Any thoughts?

    --
    Global warming is a cube.
    1. Re:I see a trend by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is this the end of the good times? Are we witnessing the beginning of the "real" internet business, where there is no space for startups and the only players have to be the huge ones?

      Are you new to the internet? This is exactly what happened during Bubble 1.0: All of the big, established companies were desperately fearful that they were going to miss out on whatever the up and comers were doing, so they bought them up left and right. The reality is that such is a great time for small startups because they don't have to bother with silly things like revenue models or rational business plans - Just try to pay the bills long enough to get bought out by Yahoo/Google/Microsoft/Ebay and then let them deal with it. Eventually big business will find that a lot of them were, for lack of a better word, fads (podcasting, for instance, has incredibly limited real-world potential, but by the talk you'd think we're soon going to listen to every dweeb with a microphone) in an anti-revenue space, and they'll abandon them.

      Rinse and repeat.

    2. Re:I see a trend by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Are we witnessing the beginning of the "real" internet business, where there is no space for startups

      I think you're misunderstanding a lot of the so called "startups". A lot of business's get started with the hope of being bought out by a big company.

      Look at it this way:
      Would you rather form a startup, work hard and sweat all your life hoping to eventually rival the giants in your field, or would you prefer to form a startup, work hard and sweat for a few years, until some big corporation sees the what you've achieved, and gives you a big paycheck, effectively buying out your company?

      While I can appreciate those who want to someday replace the Yahoo's, and Adobe's of the world, I myself would be more than happy to spend a few years toiling in the fields, if it meant a paycheck which would allow me to retire at the age of 40!

      Not that del.icio.us was looking for the "big payoff", but your post seems to imply that being bought out is somehow akin to selling out (very similar to the rants you hear when a popular independant band signs on to a major label), which is something I disagree with. Having said that, I am rather interested in what yaho will do with the technology... I'm guessing we'll see some new enhancements to the Yahoo toolbar for starters. Something like "People who have enjoyed the page you're currently on have also enjoyed the following: www.xxx.com, www.yyy.com, etc."

    3. Re:I see a trend by ryan1234 · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me? Established players buying startups is what creates a more diverse web, precisely because entrepenuers can cash out. Expect this to only enrich the web as startups try to get their share of Google's IPO via buyouts.

    4. Re:I see a trend by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Short answer to your question: No.

      Medium-length answer to your question: When Microsoft runs out of startup companies to buy, I'll start worrying.

      Slightly long answer: Of course not. It is well-known that bureaucracy stifles invention, it's one of the basic tenets of business. This is why (to refer to answer #2) Microsoft keeps buying companies all the time - it's a lot easier than trying to out-innovate the world. There will always be new fruit to pick, and people coming up with new and inventive ways to pick it. These companies will always be attractive purchases for the megacorporations for two reasons which should be perfectly obvious to anyone with more than one neuron but I will enumerate them anyway. First, they add value to their own products/brand. Second, it stops that company from competing and prevents anyone else from buying them. Thus it's both an investment and an insurance policy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:I see a trend by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are we witnessing the beginning of the "real" internet business, where there is no space for startups and the only players have to be the huge ones?

      Delicious could have said no, we aren't selling. It's not like Yahoo forced them to sell. So how exactly did you come to the conclusion that the only players are the huge ones? Delicious was a player.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    6. Re:I see a trend by spydink · · Score: 1

      Looks like they're ahead of schedule.
      http://www.robinsloan.com/epic/

      --
      Always be sincere, whether you mean it or not.
    7. Re:I see a trend by OakDragon · · Score: 1
      I am just worried that this kind of business is finally becoming... well pretty much like EVERY business out there

      That's the way it looks, but it was ever thus. But think about the "hard" side of the economy, and imagine the resources you would need to be able to create a startup automobile company. You would need huge backing to compete. (Well, maybe not with the shape GM is in these days :) But just about 50 years ago, Preston Tucker almost did it.

      Now, in the "soft" side of the economy, startups are relatively cheap and easy. And some of these startups make no bones about their intentions: they want to be successful enough to be bought by one of the big guys. Then they can take that money and innovate something else, or buy an island, or whatever. But usually they invent something else new, which gets bought... Not too bad for the consumer, really.

    8. Re:I see a trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What do you mean, no space for startups? Looks more like good times for startups to me. Hey, I wouldn't mind being paid millions for making some scripts popular.

    9. Re:I see a trend by Billosaur · · Score: 1

      Of course this is the trend. It's happened in every major industry since time immemorial. That's how we came about the anti-trust laws, after Big Oil sucked up smaller companies and competition narrowed to a handful of oil barons who could set market prices pretty much at will.

      Oil. Automobiles. Aircraft. When some segment of industry first starts out, everyone has a bright idea and tries to exploit it to make money and grow their company. Eventually, companies merge as they find advantages in buying up the good ideas of the competition or exploiting resources they can't develop themselves. Eventually the number of companies shrinks and their size grows.

      And now it's the Internet's turn. Microsoft, Google, Yahoo... they're all absorbing the innovation they see around them, trying to maintain a competitive advantage. But all that will happen is that as small company innovation is eroded, the larger comapnies will become more homogenous and begin to look more and more like each other. At that point, things will stagnate, until the Next Big Thing comes along.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    10. Re:I see a trend by giorgiofr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      but your post seems to imply that being bought out is somehow akin to selling out

      No, not really, that's not what I meant. I just thought it would become harder to start a new business as a small player if everybody else is huge. And yes, it might be better to sell and retire at 40, but I don't know for sure... I guess it depends on what your goals are.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    11. Re:I see a trend by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      So how exactly did you come to the conclusion that the only players are the huge ones? Delicious was a player.

      Lokk at that "was" you used and you'll find some food for thought. I didin't mean they were forced or anything. I meant they have to be huge in order to be succesful.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    12. Re:I see a trend by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you have to develop them before you sell them for millions, and it's gonna be tough if everybody you're up against is a heavyweight.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    13. Re:I see a trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget how capitalism actually works. Established players can get so big that they may not be able to see or react to trends that start relatively small. Small companies can be born and thrive at these low levels that a large company might ignore or not see. As a forest's trees become taller and taller, they open up the forest floor to an entirely different ecosystem that will spawn the next generation of tall trees. There isn't a limit to the number of companies that can exist, so there's not much stopping a small company from out-maneuvering a large company in a new niche.

      And if Yahoo buying flickr and del.icio.us and ruins them, a small company then has an opportunity to restore or improve those ideas.

    14. Re:I see a trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this the end of the good times?

      Well, yes. I swallowed a bug. I'm afraid the good times are over.

    15. Re:I see a trend by Eightyford · · Score: 1

      At least a good deal of the internet millionairs spend a lot their money on worthwhile things.

    16. Re:I see a trend by trollable · · Score: 0, Troll

      Don't worry. I have no plan to buy Microsoft.

    17. Re:I see a trend by dangitman · · Score: 1
      (podcasting, for instance, has incredibly limited real-world potential,

      That doesn't make a lot of sense. Podcasting is already extremely popular, and is very useful in the real world.

      but by the talk you'd think we're soon going to listen to every dweeb with a microphone)

      I've never heard anyone say that. Who are the people saying these things? There are many very professional Podcasts, plenty from major media organizations world-wide. Using a podcast does not mean you have to listen to "any dweeb with a microphone." It has the potential to take (another) huge bite out of live radio. Just like the internet has seriously changed the newspaper business.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    18. Re:I see a trend by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Ah...I knew the podcasting bit would get bites.

      That doesn't make a lot of sense. Podcasting is already extremely popular, and is very useful in the real world.

      Among the general population, podcasting is a complete non-event. Of course, as is common, people saw the rise of podcasting among those early adopters willing to embrace a new and awkward technology temporarily, and the classic mistake of drawing an endless growth curve is repeated.

      The hype about podcasting happened because of the believe that soon everyone would be involved in the podcast community.

      Using a podcast does not mean you have to listen to "any dweeb with a microphone."

      90% of the purported advantage of podcasting is the "Long Tail" - instead of us all being confined to a small number of sources, we can all be producers and endlessly pick amongst exactly the content we want. It would free us from the reigns of the evil radio conglomerates!

      There are many very professional Podcasts, plenty from major media organizations world-wide. Using a podcast does not mean you have to listen to "any dweeb with a microphone." It has the potential to take (another) huge bite out of live radio.

      Right - it's another distribution mechanism for the existing media producers. That is news why, again? That isn't news, and that has never been the reason for hype behind podcasting. "OMG! You can automatically download snippets from CBC and BBC!"

      Just like the internet has seriously changed the newspaper business.

      Radio is nothing like the newspaper business. Firstly, radio is awkward: People only listen to the radio generally when no other option is available. In the car, for instance, or at a gym with no TVs, or at the workplace when it's just background noise. Podcasting represents very little of a threat to any of these. It isn't going to change anything.

    19. Re:I see a trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why do ppl feel they need to answer a post three times? Maybe just a /. thing. Still, after I've read the first and second I only get a couple of sentances into the third before I get bored.

    20. Re:I see a trend by ultramk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Something like "People who have enjoyed the page you're currently on have also enjoyed the following: www.xxx.com, www.yyy.com, etc.

      You know, it wouldn't have killed you to put NSFW on that first link, and the second one isn't even working... jeesh.

      m-

      (yes, it's a joke.)

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    21. Re:I see a trend by KrackHouse · · Score: 1

      I figured out a way to beat Google while enriching the little guy. Patent Pending. Give me five years.

      --
      What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
      http://houndwire.com
    22. Re:I see a trend by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      And the owners will likely now be financially independent and free to experiment/tinker with whatever they like.

    23. Re:I see a trend by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      Lokk at that "was" you used and you'll find some food for thought.

      No I won't, because new startups come every day to the web, and many get bought up precisely because they are players. Been going this way for 10 years now.

      I didin't mean they were forced or anything. I meant they have to be huge in order to be succesful.

      So if Delicious wasn't successful, why did Yahoo buy them?

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    24. Re:I see a trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of business's get started with the hope of being bought out by a big company.

      WTF?

    25. Re:I see a trend by asuffield · · Score: 1

      It's always been pretty much like every business out there. Most of the really cool stuff gets done by things that aren't really businesses (like individuals, volunteer organisations, and a few universities); all the businesses are ultimately interested only in the bottom line.

      All you're seeing here are exit strategies - people have built something that works, or appears to, so now they're cashing in. That just tells you that they're just another business - it's the money that they care about. Thinking otherwise is naive at best, and shows a gross lack of attention to history.

      Standard recipe for a startup:

      1. Have a new idea
      2. Develop the idea into a product
      3. Sell out

    26. Re:I see a trend by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      Podcasting is already extremely popular, and is very useful in the real world.

      That doesn't mean there's much money in it. Podcasting right now is a fad, with tons of people trying to make a quick buck off of the popularity. A handfull will actually succeed, probably using very traditional business models, a few more will get bought up by BigCo, and the vast majority will fall by the wayside, wondering why The Revolution didn't last.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    27. Re:I see a trend by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      Delicious could have said no, we aren't selling.

      Actually, they couldn't have without a business model. They would have gone dry and been scooped up in less than a year. I think getting bought by BigCo had been the plan for del.icio.us for a long time now. Yeah, they could have run ads or something and maybe covered costs, but from day one they were more valuable to Yahoo or Google or Microsoft or somebody else than they would have been independent.

      That isn't to say there's no room for startups to compete: just that for most, the prospects of getting bought out are much better.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    28. Re:I see a trend by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Among the general population, podcasting is a complete non-event.

      How do you know? What makes you say this? The local radio station I listen to podcasts most of their talk shows. The station says the podcasts are extremely popular. The audience for that station is typically NOT composed of geeks.

      among those early adopters willing to embrace a new and awkward technology temporarily, and the classic mistake of drawing an endless growth curve is repeated.

      1. What is "awkward" about podcasting? It appeals to people because it is so convenient and easy. Click on podcast. Get regular audio/video. Which gets automatically tranferred to your playlists and iPod.

      2. When did I, or anyone else, say that it would have endless growth? I just said it is popular and useful. Neither of which you have meaningfully rebutted.

      Right - it's another distribution mechanism for the existing media producers. That is news why, again?

      It's news because it's popular. And the point is not that it's new, or offer any substantially different media. It's that the delivery method is very important. Podcasting is convenient, and replaces the awkwardness of going to multiple websites and searching for content. Eliminates the need to check for new content. So, it's not particularly radical - but that doesn't mean it's not popular and useful.

      Radio is nothing like the newspaper business. Firstly, radio is awkward: People only listen to the radio generally when no other option is available. In the car, for instance, or at a gym with no TVs, or at the workplace when it's just background noise. Podcasting represents very little of a threat to any of these. It isn't going to change anything.

      You sound like the people who thought the internet was "just a fad" for geeks and early adopters.

      Also, your comment about the radio makes little sense. Again, what is so awkward about radio? And what makes you think people only listen in the background? I listen to very interesting and informative radio shows which I give my full attention. Talk-back radio is extremely popular - suggesting that radio listeners are NOT passive, and want to interact with their radio hosts.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    29. Re:I see a trend by dangitman · · Score: 1
      That doesn't mean there's much money in it.

      Why should I care? I'm not talking about money. Many of the best things in life are unprofitable.

      Podcasting right now is a fad, with tons of people trying to make a quick buck off of the popularity

      I don't quite see it this way. All the podcasts I use are by people not expecting to make money - or from existing radio stations which are community-run - as a convenience for their listeners. I don't see many people thinking they will make money directly from podcasting.

      A handfull will actually succeed, probably using very traditional business models, a few more will get bought up by BigCo, and the vast majority will fall by the wayside, wondering why The Revolution didn't last.

      So what? That's the typical mark of a successful medium. So podcasting will still being used by media. How does that make podcasting unsuccessful, just because you don't like the content or the companies producing it? Assuming your scenario comes true. I'm not sure why everyone is so quick to dismiss this. After all, who would have thought "blogging" could be so big? Who would have thought one little MP3 player could shake up the whole music industry. Who would have a thought a mere search engine could challenge Microsoft? We just don't know yet, and it is foolish to narrow your thinking. What has amazed me about the internet, is that the "success" in adoption was driven by stuff that most geeks consider utterly stupid - like animated smileys, online casinos, etc.

      It's incredible how much the "little things" have made the internet popular - while many of the "big ideas" have fallen by the wayside. If anything, I think podcasting will succeed because it's not a "big idea" - it's just a little one that makes sense. Podcasting is not going to be at the center of anyone's media universe - but it will make a regular part of the digital diet for many people.

      Streaming media and other online delivery have been tried many, many times - but it wasn't until the word "podcasting" came into play that media outlets started really getting interested in it. It's hard to get people interested when you have to explain a bunch of keywords like "streaming" and a bunch of different video players. But when they have a simple word like "podcasting" and know what it does because they own an iPod - it clicks.

      I find it very surprising myself, I was working in this area (online media) during the internet boom. I'm amazed at how much that stupid word "podcasting" has changed perceptions. It doesn't make sense - but that's how the world works. It's like when writing a journal online became "blogging." Why do people respond to really dumb words? It kind of drives me crazy, but it can't be denied.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    30. Re:I see a trend by trollable · · Score: 1

      Troll?
      Scoop: at least on /. mod doesn't know what a troll is.
      Anyway it was meant funny. In fact, it is not so much funny but this is certainly not a troll.

  8. del.icio.us and Katrina PeopleFinder by wayward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Katrina PeopleFinder project http://katrinahelp.info/wiki/index.php/Katrina_Peo pleFinder_Project was a group of volunteers who put together data from numerous Katrina sites. The team members used del.icio.us to add and tag links to sites with survivor/missing data. It was really a good resource, and the PeopleFinder project ultimately gathered over 640000 records and supported over a million searches.

  9. Only one word describes this move: by daeley · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Scrum.tru.le.scent!

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    1. Re:Only one word describes this move: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      w.h.at a st.up.id f.uck.ing na.me.

  10. The deal may be delicious... by digitaldc · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but did it go down smoothly?

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:The deal may be delicious... by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 1

      I think not - It went down the wrong way. That is, it's full of hot air.

      --
      http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
  11. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Any bets how long until we'll be forced to change our login there and get one of the ridiculous yahoo accounts?

    Urgh. *goes export his del.icio.us bookmarks*

    1. Re:So... by carlivar · · Score: 1

      Why are Yahoo accounts ridiculous?

      --
      Vote Libertarian
    2. Re:So... by GweeDo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't you mean "rid.iculo.us" yahoo accounts?

    3. Re:So... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      What is so offensive about getting a Yahoo account, other than that all the hipster Google fanboys will insist that you should get a Google account instead?

      --
      For more information, click here.
    4. Re:So... by dthree · · Score: 1

      No good user names left.

      I think i can get dthree_88971245 for myself. Cool.

      --
      "I forgot my mantra."
    5. Re:So... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      I'm sure "dthree_from_slashdot" is still available. You just have to get creative. /me feels lucky for having joined Yahoo! in '96 and getting a short username then

      --
      For more information, click here.
  12. Flickr.icio.us, anyone? by ewg · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Flickr.icio.us, anyone?

    --
    org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
    1. Re:Flickr.icio.us, anyone? by coughman · · Score: 1

      It already exists. Warning: not safe for work http://www.flickrlicio.us/

  13. Tagging vs. Searching by Mean_Nishka · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is a good acquisition for Yahoo. Makes a lot of sense since much of what del.icio.us is about is 'tagging' the web.

    What's interesting is seeing the dynamic of Internet search philosphy developing here. Google's about 'searching' and Yahoo, it seems, is about 'tagging.'

    1. Re:Tagging vs. Searching by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      To be fair, Yahoo was originally about hard categorization. These days they're trying to buy their way into tagging, but I'm not sure they necessarily get it yet. Then again, given that gmail allows you to apply only one label to an email, I'm not sure google gets it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Tagging vs. Searching by blahtree · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1) Google is about tagging too. Witness Gmail. Labels = tags.

      2) Personally, I don't see tagging and searching as competing Internet search philosophies. One is the table of contents and one is the index. You use both, just at different times depending on your need.

    3. Re:Tagging vs. Searching by blahtree · · Score: 1

      Say what? Gmail allows you to apply as many labels as you like to an email. Well, ok, I only tried two, but still, you're not limited to one. In fact, anytime you add a label to a message that is still in the Inbox, it has two labels: Inbox and $yourlabel.

    4. Re:Tagging vs. Searching by Leviathant · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't go so far as to make such a sweeping generalization. Both Gmail and Picasa use tagging to help sort and search their data. Google videos and Google Base also use similar meta data to aid in categorization and in searches.

      --
      I am Leviathant and I approve this message.
    5. Re:Tagging vs. Searching by superboy · · Score: 1

      Expanding on what someone else said, this is demonstrably untrue -- gmail messages can certainly have multiple tags, and indeed, you can search your gmail based on combinations of tags, which I find insanely useful. One search on "label:work label:todo" and, well, you can figure out what I get.

      This isn't to say that the labels mechanism (and the search mechanism!) in gmail couldn't use some improvement, but I think they "get" it pretty well -- it's one of the few features that dragged me back to using gmail for everything.

      -R

      --
      R. Francis Smith http://www.sturgeonslaw.com/
    6. Re:Tagging vs. Searching by amichail · · Score: 1

      BTW, you may be interested in this search engine for del.icio.us:

      http://collabrank.web.cse.unsw.edu.au/del.icio.us/

      Del.icio.us users bookmarking helpful/timely URLs (as evidenced by others subsequently bookmarking those URLs) have greater influence on the search rankings.

    7. Re:Tagging vs. Searching by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      Google is about tagging too. Witness Gmail. Labels = tags.

      Not only that, but last month Google also quietly added tagging capabilities to search histories.

    8. Re:Tagging vs. Searching by JeremyALogan · · Score: 1

      So how will they filter out all the people like me? Using foxylicious I use del.icio.us to handle all my bookmarks so I can access them everywhere. You'll have lots of tags that will look like Automobiles->Aircraft->Homebuilt->Airplanes. Which doesn't seem that hard to parse until you realize del.icio.us expects them to be space (" ") delimeted lists and that everyone will have different methods of sub categorizing (the default is a period, in that case you'd get Automobiles.Aircraft.Homebuilt.Airplanes).

    9. Re:Tagging vs. Searching by Council · · Score: 1

      Personally, I don't see tagging and searching as competing Internet search philosophies. One is the table of contents and one is the index. You use both, just at different times depending on your need.

      That's not a dichotomy, it's a single system. Tag-search is one side of the spectrum and heirarchical folders is the other. You create and search tags. "Looking" at a tag is just a simple search.

      Tag-search systems will take over as the file/data-storage paradigm in a whole lot of areas. We're just seeing the start of this. Rarely do I make predictions like this, but I've been quite sure of this for some time. Spotlight, del.icio.us, and iTunes are just the start.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    10. Re:Tagging vs. Searching by Council · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, heirarchical folders is an other. There are a lot of paradigms.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    11. Re:Tagging vs. Searching by fupeg · · Score: 1
      Actually I'd say that Yahoo is all about using people's insight over algorithmiic insight. Examples:
      • Yahoo News has always used editors to determine top stories. Google News prides itself on not using people for this, just its search engine and clustering of results
      • Yahoo's local search uses user reviews of search results. So if you search for "Chinese food" near a certain location, Yahoo will show you higher rated/reviewed results over closer ones potentially.
      It's not hard to imagine them using tags to improve search results in their web search now.
  14. Re:Yahoo Is Evil - bitten by the /. bug by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 0, Troll
    "Web 2.0"

    Looks like you got bitten by the same Slashdot bug that got me a day ago. You thought you were posting to the new top article on Slashdot, and by the time you hit Submit you found out that you've posted to the even newer top article on Slashdot.

    THERE'S A BUG HERE FOLKS IN SLASHDOT'S POSTING CODE!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  15. Yet another free service that'll become useless? by vfwlkr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Except that it all web2 hype even before Yahoo acquired it. Now that's its been Yahoo'd, it going to become completely irrelevant

    There's a fundamental difference between how Yahoo and Google approach a new service:
    Yahoo: How do we milk this thing?
    Google: How does this benefit our end users?
    Not convinced: How many clicks to read new Gmail, and how many to read yahoo mail? And how many ads in each? Or compare blogger to Yahoo360.

    Yahoo acquiring a web2.0 hyped servie, is an oxymoron. The web2.0 folks, atleast claim to making stuff easier for end users. Yahoo, on the other hand, works on the exact opposite philiosophy. What's the point of this acquisition then?

    --
    If you're not using firefox, you're not surfing the web, you're suffering it.
    ---
  16. How much did Y! pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there any news about how much Yahoo! paid for del.icio.us?

  17. Yahoo! really taking it to google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to say, Yahoo! is doing a really good job. I really love konfabulator, and flickr. Del.icio.us is a great addition. Google better get on the ball.

  18. From the comments on blog.de.licio.us... by deathbyzen · · Score: 0

    (Here's hoping they offer an option to keep the service ad-free...) I'm supressing my laughter...

  19. Re:Yet another free service that'll become useless by FatRatBastard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's the point of this acquisition then?

    Tagging, pure and simple. It has nothing (or very little) to do with how many ads Yahoo wants to throw at you. Yahoo isn't looking to simply buy eyeballs to boost their ad revenues. Yahoo believes that it can best Google by having humans tag information as opposed to algorithms tag information, which is the way (apparently) Google currently orders the web. This is why Yahoo purchased Flickr, and I suspect it will be the foremost driver of future acquisitions.

    It will be interesting to see which philosophy, if any, is "better."

  20. They want the del.icio.us user base by BigCheese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yahoo already has a nearly identical service. It works but, there is not much of a community behind it since there was no compelling reason to leave del.icio.us to use Yahoo bookmarks.
    They're buying del.icio.us for the community not the technology.

    --
    The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
    1. Re:They want the del.icio.us user base by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

      Funny if that is true, as Yahoo's purchase of Del.icio.us makes it less delicious to me.

    2. Re:They want the del.icio.us user base by phyjcowl · · Score: 1

      I came across a site called, if I remember correctly (can't seem to access it at the moment though) del.irio.us, which was a similar idea and I think I remember it being open source.

    3. Re:They want the del.icio.us user base by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They're buying del.icio.us for the community not the technology."

      They are getting Joshua (the creator) to work for them. It can be argued that more important than both community and technology is getting the brainpower for Yahoo to help along their long term strategy of tying the entire Yahoo network together. Looking at the Flickr/Konfabulator/Oddpost purchases, having the main guys that started those on board at Yahoo was clearly a large factor in those acquisitions and this is no different.

    4. Re:They want the del.icio.us user base by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there are good reasons to use MyWeb 2 instead of del.icio.us. MyWeb saves a copy of the pages you bookmark, so should it go down, you can still access it. The search function also searches in the text of the page, rather than just your tags. This means, supposing you tagged a page as "funny", you can find it later with "pranks" which you didn't tag.

      It is a shame that there's less competition now, though. Services trying to one-up each other is always good. This isn't entirely unexpected, though - del.icio.us had to eventually start making money one way or another.

  21. Slashdot acquired by SCO by Dynamoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Darl McBride says that "all your ideas are belong to us" and starts a mass lawsuit against every idea ever. McBride is quoted as saying "Benjamin Franklin is gonna have to cough up for all that IP he ripped from us, else he's gonna have to say a big HI to his new cellmant BUBBA."

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
    1. Re:Slashdot acquired by SCO by Dynamoo · · Score: 1

      cellmant = cellmate. All your speling are belong to us.

      --
      Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
    2. Re:Slashdot acquired by SCO by tsadi · · Score: 1

      speling = spelling

  22. Alternatives? by edmicman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What are the alternatives since everyone (both here and digg) seem to be bitching a whole lot about it? Is there a free/open source something you can install on your own server? It seems like a simple enough concept, I would think someone had already copied it by now.

    1. Re:Alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Alternatives? by BigCheese · · Score: 1

      SiteBar http://sitebar.org/ is a pretty good php/MySQL webapp.

      --
      The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
  23. BS on Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google does not think that.

    Google thinks, "How will this benefit our advertisers?"

  24. Terms of the deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone have the inside scoup on the deal and how much money they recieved?

  25. Bubblicious!! by Slashdoc+Beta · · Score: 1

    Does del.icio.us even have a business model? I wonder how much they paid for it.

    1. Re:Bubblicious!! by wbren · · Score: 1
      Does del.icio.us even have a business model? I wonder how much they paid for it.
      Google AdWords
      --
      -William Brendel
  26. Re: Yahoo! Buys del.icio.us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So does that mean I need a Yahoo! account now

  27. delete account by sycomonkey · · Score: 1

    Are you sure you want to delete your account? yes You're account has been permanently deleted.

    --
    --The universe will not be altered by forum threads, even those which are very wry. --Tycho Brahe (Penny Arcade)
  28. all your base... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    belong.to.us

    1. Re:all your base... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I need to snatch that address quickly!

  29. Didnt yahoo fuck up flickr bad? by doormat · · Score: 1

    With that whole merging accounts and stuff. I'd hate to see what they're going to do with del.icio.us.

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    1. Re:Didnt yahoo fuck up flickr bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see that being a huge problem. If the account merging issues are the only bad thing that's happened to Flickr since the buyout, I'd say they're doing pretty well.

      If anything, I'd say Flickr has improved; we now have photo printing, and no, there isn't a flashing banner ad to be seen on the site. Give Yahoo! a bit of credit.

  30. Based off past experience with Yahoo .... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Based off what I've seen in the past, I predict del.icio.us is about to become useless crap, infested with ads, and a generally unpleasant experience.

    Every time I've used a service which Yahoo has come on board to, it becomes unuseable crap. And shorly after they come on board I end up stopping using it because it is no longer as good as it once was.

    Which is really too bad, because I was beginning to find del.icio.us exceedingly useful to me. Now I'll probably have to export all of my bookmarks and see what else I can find.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Based off past experience with Yahoo .... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      del.icio.us has already been infested with spam.me.rs who tag everything with hundreds of keywords. It's exactly like the old days of META keyword stuffing that made Yahoo! and Altavista such a chore to use.

      Might as well export all your bookmarks to Google Bookmark BETA, coming to a Web 2.0-compliant browser to you sometime in the next yearosphere.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:Based off past experience with Yahoo .... by Iaughter · · Score: 1
      Based off what I've seen in the past, I predict del.icio.us is about to become useless crap, infested with ads, and a generally unpleasant experience. Every time I've used a service which Yahoo has come on board to, it becomes unuseable crap. And shorly after they come on board I end up stopping using it because it is no longer as good as it once was. Which is really too bad, because I was beginning to find del.icio.us exceedingly useful to me. Now I'll probably have to export all of my bookmarks and see what else I can find.

      I'm not sure what yahoo can do to make del.icio.us less desirable.

      I use firefox plugins to bookmark sites and the rss feed to review my bookmarks. I rarely, actually visit http://del.icio.us/ I couldn't care what they do to delicious' front page.

    3. Re:Based off past experience with Yahoo .... by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      del.icio.us has already been infested with spam.me.rs who tag everything with hundreds of keywords. It's exactly like the old days of META keyword stuffing that made Yahoo! and Altavista such a chore to use.

      Truthfully, the bookmarks others are making aren't the most useful aspect of del.icio.us for me.

      The ability to organize my crap with whatever tags I like, organize them into bundles, and then access them from anyplace are what makes it useful to me. I've managed to bring order to a collection of bookmarks that spans four machines and three operating systems.

      I have visions of a cluttered, slow, clunky, image-ridden POS interface being foisted atop what is there now, ads showing up in the middle of all of my &*^%&* bookmarks, and slow wait times as it always tries to resolve doubleclick.net or somesuch with every page.

      My ISP teamed up with Yahoo the other year, and started partnering/re-branding everything. I don't use any of their services anymore, except for basic network connectivity because of all of the crap Yahoo put forth -- I find it to be junk.

      I have seen the future, and it is convergence. Unfortunately, convergence isn't better; it's more cumbersome, slow, and annoying.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Based off past experience with Yahoo .... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Try Backpack. Ignoring all the imaginary buzzwords with which it complies, I've found it to be quite useful for sharing my links and information across multiple machines. The basic account is free but you can pay for other features like file hosting. You can also make pages public if you want.

      Delicious and Backpack do not serve the same purpose, but the latter is still nice for managing information. Neither Yahoo nor Google have purchased it as of right now, so you don't have to worry about annoying Flash ads or annoying text ads respectively.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  31. Re:Buttes announces victory over Flock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This crap isn't even worthy of a Troll mod. Next time this crap is posted, just bury it with an Overrated mod. Don't give this wannabe troll the compliment.

  32. Finally, some bandwidth by pndmnm · · Score: 1

    At last I can hit del.icio.us for tags and descriptions of every search result from Google on pageload (with greasemonkey) without feeling bad!

  33. Bummers by SethS · · Score: 1

    I'm really, really, really sorry to hear this! I dislike Yahoo and their practices. I will be removing my bookmarks. They had a great product and service. I'm sorry they've been eaten up by the giants.

    --
    If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention!
    1. Re:Bummers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm really, really, really sorry to hear this! I dislike Yahoo and their practices. I will be removing my bookmarks. They had a great product and service. I'm sorry they've been eaten up by the giants.

      I'm really, really, really sorry you feel that way! Gonna miss ya! Buh-bye!

  34. Tagging: So hot right now by teneighty · · Score: 1

    Interesting that this transaction went down in the same week as the tag-based dating site, Consumating was acquired by C|Net. Both were tag-based, and both had been in business for only 12 months or less - very similar situations to Flickr. Big companies are becoming much more aggressive about acquiring promising startups early - and it makes a lot of sense. These acquisitions are in the mid-to-low 7 figures, a bargin compared to trying to buy later for 100 million or more.

    1. Re:Tagging: So hot right now by ttul · · Score: 1

      Flickr was actually acquired for $35M, or so the rumours go.
      That's eight figures, not seven.

    2. Re:Tagging: So hot right now by Gray · · Score: 1

      Del.icio.us started in November 2003. Two years.

  35. base by centinall · · Score: 1

    it may already be there in the sense that it is quite possible that google base can already do this (i think). Perhaps all they need to do is add a "favourites" template in base's configuration page.

  36. Base by centinall · · Score: 1

    google in a way, might already have this. I don't know, but google base, with a "favourites" template could provide this functionality quite easily, do you think? I've read a little about turning your base entries into rss or atom, and there will be, if there isn't already some type of base web api's to add, edit and delete content.

  37. New name by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    But now del!.icio!.us! will not a safe password anymore

  38. Re:Yet another free service that'll become useless by zen-theorist · · Score: 1
    Not convinced: How many clicks to read new Gmail, and how many to read yahoo mail? And how many ads in each? Or compare blogger to Yahoo360.

    also, how many clicks to delete the current mail in gmail, and how many to delete in yahoo mail?

  39. My del.icio.us Clone by BioCS.Nerd · · Score: 1

    I actually just finished writing a very amateurish del.icio.us clone for a project in my class on J2EE. I was planning on GPLing it once the class was done. It seems my timing might not be too bad for such a thing.

  40. Why not delicio.us? by NittanyTuring · · Score: 1

    Why is it del.icio.us? Couldn't they just as easily have picked delicio.us?

    1. Re:Why not delicio.us? by jdigriz · · Score: 1

      Clearly so they could have capr.icio.us under the same domain!

    2. Re:Why not delicio.us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Craps, this bungs my chances at sidv.icio.us now, dunnit.

    3. Re:Why not delicio.us? by elemental23 · · Score: 1


      $ grep \.icio\.us$ /usr/share/dict/web2.0

      ausp.icio.us
      avar.icio.us
      capr.icio.us
      del.icio.us
      inausp.icio.us
      injud.icio.us
      jud.icio.us
      mal.icio.us
      meretr.icio.us
      off.icio.us
      pern.icio.us
      susp.icio.us
      v.icio.us

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  41. Looking for.. by i+chose+another · · Score: 1

    Ruby devs.
    I just heard a rumor http://maple.nu/ are looking for developers contanct maple.nu@gmail.com if you feel comfortable using ruby and want to contribute ;)

  42. del.et.ed by owlnation · · Score: 1

    Just went to my bookmarks and trashed the del.icio.us link.

    I was an eGroups member until Yahoo completely destroyed that, though it may be a few years ago now I'm not going to start trusting Yahoo now.

    The spam was increasing on del.icio.us anyway, so I guess it's no great loss.

  43. Google is innovative! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And 1 month later many posts on Slashdot will praise Google's innovations in launching this functionality, and criticize others for copying :)

    Like when Google totally ripped off MS Start.com (now Live.com) with ig, but many /. comments has turned this around to being a case of MS copying Google, when timelines clearly proves otherwise.

  44. (-1, Unfunny) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just plain not funny.

  45. Greatttt!!!! by dep01 · · Score: 1

    now Yahoo! can clutter up the homepage, splash ads all over it, decrease the overall speed by about 30%, and dork it up with their ever-THERE "Yahoo!!!!" logo... Woohoo! dep

    --
    "hey, could you pass me a paper towel? er.. I mean... DEPLOY ABSORBTION PANEL!"
  46. Re:Yet another free service that'll become useless by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

    It takes me 3 clicks to read an email in Yahoo mail:
    Click to login
    Click on Inbox
    Click on the email.

    How many clicks does it take in gmail?

    --
    Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
  47. Web 2.0 by web20 · · Score: 0

    Let's face it - in the Web 2.0 world, one of the most important things is user interaction. Sure, Yahoo is known all around the blogosphere as a good netizen - but does this mean they are commited to the del.icio.us philosophy? Web 2.0 is all about the user. del.icio.us, and many other popular sites such as http://www.kuro5hin.org/ and http://www.digg.com/ function as kind of a "podcast for news" allowing users access to many new news sites posted by the blogees themselves. However, one only sees material the major news services have posted on Yahoo News. By this hostile takeover of del.icio.us, Yahoo becomes able to more leverage the blogosphere and its many netizens.

    1. Re:Web 2.0 by Bassman59 · · Score: 1
      Will you shut up about this fucking "Web 2.0" bullshit, please?

      Your rants are so, like, 1999.

  48. Re:Yet another free service that'll become useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Click to login
    Click on the email.

    33% more efficient! Thus, 33% more awesome ;)

  49. Google Bookmarks already exists by manastungare · · Score: 1

    Do this: switch on personalized search for yourself, http://www.google.com/psearch . Then, search for something and visit the links it shows you. Then go back to Personalized Search, and star the items you want to add. You can tag them, add notes, and there you go ... It's just not called Google Bookmarks yet.

    1. Re:Google Bookmarks already exists by ilovja · · Score: 1

      Google personalized search doesn't seem to have social features. Or have I missed something?

  50. Are you still jabbering about that guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let it go, man. You sound like some pathetic guy who's whining about his ex from 5 years ago. Darl must've really hurt you. Did you catch him in bed with your father or something?

  51. Shameless plug(in) by manastungare · · Score: 1

    Oh great, just the day my del.icio.us plugin for Google Desktop appears on their site ...

  52. Worst news in a long time by l0b0 · · Score: 1

    That's it then, for the feature most loved about del.icio.us: The dead simple interface. Now it'll be 2+ links away from the main page, accessible only through their enormously bloated I-wish-I-was-using-lynx-right-now interface, with a password form that for some stupid reason doesn't work with the Password Generator.

    I guess I'll just have to backup my 2393 bookmarks and 3482 unique tags (as of today) and, dunno, hope someone builds an open source version.

    1. Re:Worst news in a long time by GarconDuMonde · · Score: 1

      have a look at http://de.lirio.us/rubric - open source, including scripts to import del.icio.us bookmarks. shame the box is so slow, tho....

  53. Great, now they can require NS4.7 on macs! by badmonkey · · Score: 1

    It would be great if every we product yahoo buys could conform to the yahoo music standard of requiring Netscape 4.7 on macs. Hooray for old school browsers!

  54. Yay, another company that can't stand on its own. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we should be mourning companies that are aquired, not celebrating.

  55. In Other News... by craXORjack · · Score: 2, Funny
    The top computer executive and last remaining employee from a dotcom era online delicatessan has let his web domain http://deli.cio.us/ lapse but plans to register a new domain http://face.tio.us/ which will compete head to head with The Onion, currently number two in the field of late-breaking, hard-hitting faux journalism. Herman has a new dream. Instead of Fed-Exing beef jerky, he wants to grow his satire's readership large enough to take over the number two spot. Then, through a leveraged buyout of The Onion become large enough to take on the 800 pound gorilla, Fox News.

    Says Herman Johnson, CIO of Mail Order Meats, 'my site was getting pounded hard by a bunch of yahoos who seemed to have no interest in spicy smoked meats. I don't know where they were coming from but it was one more in a long series of unfortunate events that burned through the last of my IPO money. Earlier this year I had already moved the offices from a 200,000 sq. ft. high rise in Mountain View to a corner of my parent's basement to try to conserve cash.'

    'Suddenly this storm of activity hit. They used up all my bandwidth but didn't buy anything, only leaving rude innuendoes in the forums about my kielbasa sausages. It was just time to try something new. Plus my mom needed the space in her deep freezer where I kept my inventory and the Slim Jims kept disappearing. I suspect an inside job. I told my dad I know it's him and if I ever catch him I will call the police.'

    Mail Order Meats (Stock symbol MOM) which once reached a high of 212 1/8 dollars a share now trades over the counter at 0.00004 cents.

    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
  56. Some offline application maybe? by vitalyb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I love the concept of Delicious.
    However, I really hate how I have to wait everytime I want to search/edit my bookmarks. I really wish that there was some kind of external app (Powermarks style) that let me easily play with my bookmarks and update/sync from Delicious only in the background.

    Anyone knows anything like that?

  57. Re:Yet another free service that'll become useless by Quixote · · Score: 2, Informative
    Insightful my ass!

    Google: How does this benefit our end users?

    If you think Google is about benefitting users and not making money, you're naive. Google is a public company now. Their sole responsibility is to their shareholders and not their "users".

    And how many ads in each?

    Yahoo has 1 ad at the top. Period. GMail has ads all along the side. So if you're counting numbers, GMail loses.
    And more importantly: Google digs through your email to serve you ads. Don't you people find this just a little bit creepy? And these ads benefit the users.. how? Are they there to make money for GMail, or to somehow magically improve the content of your email message?

  58. Does anyone know how much Yahoo paid? by t35t0r · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know how much Yahoo paid for del.icio.us?

  59. No by jeriqo · · Score: 1

    NO, NO, NO, NO, NO.
    Please, don't let them buy all the good free stuff available.

    --
    Alexis 'jeriqo' BRET
  60. Re:Yet another free service that'll become useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if benefiting the end users makes money, then they would be appeasing their shareholders, wouldn't they?

  61. Hope yahoo doesn't change the structure by ravee · · Score: 1

    I am a very heavy user of del.icio.us not only in bookmarking sites but also to search for valuable content. What sets del.icio.us apart from the other bookmarking tools is its simplicity.
    Now that yahoo has taken over del.icio.us, I hope, they do not mess with its basic structure and looks which I believe is its USP.

    --
    Linux Help
    for all things on Linux
  62. Kaboodle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like http://www.kaboodle.com/ - more than just bookmarking really. Useful for collecting/sharing research etc.

  63. del.icio.us apps for macosx by dsandler · · Score: 2, Informative
    For Mac users there's Cocoalicious, just such an application (key features: add, edit, search, visit, rate).

    Alternatively, if you're just looking for fast local searching, there's delimport, which periodically sucks down your del.icio.us bookmarks and indexes them with Spotlight.

    1. Re:del.icio.us apps for macosx by vitalyb · · Score: 1

      True, that's what I had in mind... I am on Windows however so this is of little help. I use Foxilicious right now in Firefox but that's not even getting close to Cocoalicious.

    2. Re:del.icio.us apps for macosx by donnacha · · Score: 1

      Vitalyb, I searched for Foxilicious on the Extentions page but couldn't find it, no sign of it via Google either, do you have a URL?

    3. Re:del.icio.us apps for macosx by vitalyb · · Score: 1

      I spelled it wrong, here you go:
      http://dietrich.ganx4.com/foxylicious/

    4. Re:del.icio.us apps for macosx by donnacha · · Score: 1

      Thanks, installed :)

  64. Oh my god no. by Pichu0102 · · Score: 1

    I just deleted my del.icio.us account. I don't want my Gmail account to end up like my anicent Yahoo mail account; not even able to be used because a billion spam emails make it past the filter every second.

  65. Fascinating social experiment by jmenon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't you think it's really interesting that the moment something like del.icio.us is bought, the knee-jerk reaction of most of us can almost be counted on to follow this pattern:

    (i) How do I get away from them?
    (ii) When is Google going to welcome me home?

    I think it is amazing how much trust we automatically place in Google. I always find myself thinking, "Oh, Google wants this information about me? Sure, here you go. Have my phone number and social security number too."

    Honestly, if Google offered an on-line password-management service, millions of us would flock to it. But if Yahoo! or Microsoft, or any other company did it? Forget it.

    And all this for a company who scans our email in order to serve us ads. Someone should do a sociological study of this phenomenon.


    This is trust, this is customer loyalty, this is why Google just...

    ...just wins.

    --
    "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face! It's just a goddamned piece of paper!" -- George W. Bush
    1. Re:Fascinating social experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey
      I agree !

  66. Sell out. by Dominic+Burns · · Score: 1

    Everyone's got a price.

  67. Headline by lost+in+place · · Score: 1

    Yahoo! Buys del.icio.us

    Wonderful headline.
    I'll take Why company names shouldn't have punctuation in them for $100, Alex.

  68. Re:Yet another free service that'll become useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like knowing that my one click deletes my Yahoo mail, whereas my one click in Gmail only deletes MY copy while Google still retains a second undeleted copy in their index forever.

  69. Yeah, Right by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    "We're excited to be working with the Yahoo! Search team - they definitely get social systems"

    Yet - they get how to cover your PC with crap. Very social of them.

    Oh, wait, maybe that was "socialist"...as in "we own your desktop and your browser"...

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  70. Re:Yet another free service that'll become useless by scsscs · · Score: 1

    The current generation of Yahoo Mail is old tech, so of course it takes more clicks to do things than it does in Gmail. However, the new generation of Yahoo Mail is in private beta right now and it has all the AJAX/DHTML goodness that Gmail has and more. It should be in public beta soon.

  71. I bet they were pissed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that Google didn't make an offer.

  72. Re:Yet another free service that'll become useless by Skim123 · · Score: 1
    I'm not convinced that Google has the world's "best intentions" in mind - after all, they are in business to stay in business, not win the World's Best Company prize. But regardless, does it really matter? At home for Thanksgiving I was able to observe my parents and brother on the Internet, see how they use the Web, see what email programs they use, what search engines, and so on.

    And even though they bitched about a number of things, when there were simple solutions (like, "Try Google," or, "Try FireFox"), they'd rather just keep doing it their old way. I think it is a combination of their complaints being just minor nitpicks more than real, aggrevating issues, the barrier to moving to something new, and perhaps a little bit of intimidation, since none of them are computer savvy. That is, they have a relationship with their computer currently that is like the trenches in WWI. Trying something new would be like making an assualt - it might work, but probably won't, and it's probably going to involve a lot of casualties either way. Best to just sit tight in the trench, and hope the computer is happy to do the same.

    --

    I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

  73. inevitable, i guess by metamongrel · · Score: 1

    now who's gonna buy reddit? i liked the julian barnes quote further up. exactly true.

  74. bad.for.us by kitzilla · · Score: 1

    ... given that Yahoo's policy of turning over Chinese dissidents to Beijing is so badly mis.ta.cn

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  75. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  76. Flamebait??? by Nanite · · Score: 1

    You guys have no sense of humor. I never have mod points when I see a travesty of modding such as this.

    You go, daeley. Your post was simply..... Scrumtrulescent.

    --
    God is real unless declared integer.
  77. Nice! by Soulfader · · Score: 1

    Downloaded, installed very quickly. Good interface, lots of options to play with, and with the RSS feeds it generates it can integrate with my existing site usefully. Good tip.

  78. Sounds like a reason to switch to StumbleUpon by smagruder · · Score: 1

    Once anything gets swallowed up by Yahoo, it goes to shit, like when eGroups became Yahoo! Groups.

    Check out StumbleUpon. It really is a great service, and it's not corporatized. It's supported by donors.

    --
    Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
  79. But they didn't 'buy'.... by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

    deli.cio.us which I feel is a more natural separation of the syllables.

    So we have the task before us of making sure people know what an awkward 'break' the Yahoo-'owned' meme represents, and also make sure that something really AWFUL gets put up on deli.cio.us for people to encounter instead when they type what they naturally think, i.e. http://deli.cio.us/

    --
    resigned
  80. Yahoo does a real ethical thing! by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Guys, whatever Google fanatics say, I am one of persons actually use (near) all Yahoo services.

    I noticed they upgraded their search to much more personalized stuff. "Myweb"

    Also they added public bookmarks feature: "Myweb 2.0"

    While thinking one of the huge companies stole enthusiast created things as del.icio.us, I heard this story.

    They could move along as in fact, "online bookmarks" is a yahoo invented feature back in '98 or earlier. Everyone who uses yahoo toolbar knows it. The "public" feature was invented by del.icio guys and they bought it.

    Right thing to do.

  81. Re:Yet another free service that'll become useless by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Also not to mention, GMail indexes, analyses EVERY WORD in your mail to show "relevant ads".

    Nobody including spyware developers could dare to analyse everything. We attack them since they monitor the URL user is on, Google becomes "hero" while it monitors every single private mail.

    It is a karma killer to bitch about Google and their dark practices but enough is enough. People started to act like cult members or something.

  82. Yeah sure. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Pissing off users will make shareholders very happy.

    You USians are very funny.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  83. There is more smoke than there is fire. by dr.badass · · Score: 1

    Why should I care? I'm not talking about money.

    The guy you replied to was, so I just assumed you were.

    I can't really speak for him, but I wasn't trying to take the stance that podcasting itself is "unsuccessful" or is going to fade away any time soon. People will continue to do it as long as it is doable, like most things, popular and unpopular. But popularity doesn't magically turn into profit, and profit is the most common way to measure success.

    To clarify: the original suggestion was that most podcasting-based startups (which may include directories, hosting services, podcast networks, and individual podcasters) are basically worthless. BigCos will buy a few of them up among all the hype, but unless your company is among them, you're probably going to get burned when the hype dies down.

    --
    Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
  84. caching the page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hopefully a page caching / saving feature will be added which is already implemented at sites like furl and spurl

  85. Move from del.icio.us to...? by Kossatsch · · Score: 1

    There are lots of alternatives to del.icio.us (and not only Simpy). Unfortunately only few have such a big community (and community rulez). Look at http://www.irox.de/roxomatic/856.

  86. Delicious Clone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.digforporn.com/ is an x-rated delicious clone. I think it will become bigger than delicious. Yahoo is running delicious into the ground. The site is always done