Well the crime is a personal extrapolation from the more recent studies that have found that individuals with higher T were statistically correlated with being more generous, having more friends, and being more friendly.
In fact almost all violent crimes are committed by Black males who in fact have even higher T statistically than males in general. But males and black males specifically do not commit crimes because of high T, we know this because of a series of studies that link it to higher cooperation, friendliness, and generosity.
That is because low T causes depression, and depressed people, while often angry, are to lazy to do anything. I have yet to see any decent studies that actually link anger, or antisocial behavior, to T. And quite a few of the more recent ones have found both this lack of a correlation and a correlation with T and friendliness, ect. T causing violent crimes is just a myth kept alive out of bigotry, because they want a science-y term to use to explain why these men are all so violent and inferior to them. These same people probably want to say that it decreases intelligence as well.
That is a pretty narrow study group to try and say plaything about general exercise. Not only is running not the same as any other exercise, who knows what sort of things people who "ran faster than 11 km/h for more than 4 hours a week" took, injected, ate.
Even if we ignore the taking steroids angle, sometimes these exercise freaks eat salads after running 60 miles, when they should be downing 5 pound steaks.
Once you start taking testosterone, you usually end up dependent on it for life. That means not just applying it every day, it means more frequent checkups, monitoring for side effects...
So I guess now we can now understand why the medical community has taken to it in such a big way. It is like there perfect drug, from a pusher standpoint.
But, I guess, it can lead to a cyclical relationship on its own, without the supplement. Theoretically, at least, the boost of testosterone could cause the taker to get off their ass and start with the health stuff; And start producing their own.
I don't see it. The rich successful people already have decent T, T supplements are for the ones too pathetic to accomplish anything to begin with. It is not like.001 gram of T will cost you thousands of dollars. And since, at least, natural T leads to reduced violence and crime, I see no reason to believe that unnatural T would do anything but make people even less violent.
In a regulated taxi service you have rules and regulations to adhere to in order to maintain your taxi cab license, so you follow those rules.
Which is why we have Uber, because the cabby system in 99% of the world, including the US is a complete joke riddled with corruption and just generally bad service. Should we not have save, clean, accessible public transit? Yes, that is why Uber sprang into being, even though it is strictly outlawed, because there is a great demand that is not being filled. They are not perfect, but they very well might be better than existing systems, and possibly they will shake up the system enough to fix the problems with the existing legal cabby system. There is no doubt that Uber is Sketchy, what is in doubt is are they any more sketchy than the cabby system?
Well I think there is an argument of even what system they were using.
It seems to me that the government decided to impose an unnatural monopoly, to make a few people really rich, so that they would have the incentive to protect the system. Yes, the government did impose a monopoly, but it also failed to put in any other real regulations, instead trusting to the enlightened self interest of a bunch of rich "fat cats". Instead the fat cats decided that since they already had the monopoly that they did not need to do anything to keep their cheques rolling in. So like so many things nowadays, it really is the failure of the bastard child of both capitalism and socialism. It failed because it contained none of the checks and balances of either system.
The freedom of movement is a right. It absolutely is the governments responsibility to ensure that regardless of your color, religion, or economic situation you are allowed to go downtown, get to a hospital, or your job.
And that is not something that AirBB invented. that is just generic survey taking etiquette. Psychology has known how completely useless the results of any and all surveys are if you show any summery or even individual results before the completion of said survey, for a long time now.
"This was designed to be a learning tool for students and hobbyists, not a set top multimedia box."
If that was true it would not have anywhere near the specs it has. It has on the order of 2000 times the power of a student learning device. And Other for profit boards are available at the same price with over double the specs. Enough specs to actually function decently.
Typically the point of a corporation is for the corporate assets and bank account to grow. Not for it is break even at the end of the year. What you are talking about is typically how a non-profit runs. A non-profit does not necessarily have to increasing its assets of bank balance year after year, instead it often balances the budget and pays as much in salaries as it takes in.
I am completely against any sort of tax system where the government does this.
If you do not like the corporations using loopholes in your laws close or heavily tax the loop holes. But don't just randomly throw a tax at people. The government should not have the power to randomly tax anyone it wants, any amount, at any length of notice it wants to give. If these assets should be taxed, then tax them annually.
No one really cares about such a little incident. No one is going to go through the hassle of changing providers because some minimum wage employee was a little rude while not even talking to customers.
Well, there are some arguments about it in theory. There are legitimate points to be made. And one universal truth is that there is loads of areas to be improved in how our legal system handles and defines crimes. But, no one personally is sympathetic to them, it is all theoretical.
And I really do not see where you are coming from. How does it create demand? Are there Pedophiles making a killing off of ads or subscriptions? I sort of get the impression it is more about enthusiastic individuals who do it because that is what they love, and they get a thrill of video taping and posting it. They are not some sort of business man or entertainer, who are just in it for the money or applause.
Best viewed with IE is at least in some way not something the web designer arbitrarily decided. Particularly back in the day, loads of web programming only worked well on the browser it was specifically designed for. Using another could create a worst user experience. This is goign out of your way to make third party apps not work, and banning the user of said apps.
You are the one making allegations without proof, and not even providing enough information to look up the evidence you apparently saw. If you are interested in Zoe Quinn, follow her twitter, read her old tweets, come to your own conclusions.
Slashdot Mirror
Well the crime is a personal extrapolation from the more recent studies that have found that individuals with higher T were statistically correlated with being more generous, having more friends, and being more friendly.
In fact almost all violent crimes are committed by Black males who in fact have even higher T statistically than males in general. But males and black males specifically do not commit crimes because of high T, we know this because of a series of studies that link it to higher cooperation, friendliness, and generosity.
That is because low T causes depression, and depressed people, while often angry, are to lazy to do anything. I have yet to see any decent studies that actually link anger, or antisocial behavior, to T. And quite a few of the more recent ones have found both this lack of a correlation and a correlation with T and friendliness, ect. T causing violent crimes is just a myth kept alive out of bigotry, because they want a science-y term to use to explain why these men are all so violent and inferior to them. These same people probably want to say that it decreases intelligence as well.
That is a pretty narrow study group to try and say plaything about general exercise. Not only is running not the same as any other exercise, who knows what sort of things people who "ran faster than 11 km/h for more than 4 hours a week" took, injected, ate.
Even if we ignore the taking steroids angle, sometimes these exercise freaks eat salads after running 60 miles, when they should be downing 5 pound steaks.
Once you start taking testosterone, you usually end up dependent on it for life. That means not just applying it every day, it means more frequent checkups, monitoring for side effects ...
So I guess now we can now understand why the medical community has taken to it in such a big way. It is like there perfect drug, from a pusher standpoint.
But, I guess, it can lead to a cyclical relationship on its own, without the supplement. Theoretically, at least, the boost of testosterone could cause the taker to get off their ass and start with the health stuff; And start producing their own.
I don't see it. The rich successful people already have decent T, T supplements are for the ones too pathetic to accomplish anything to begin with. It is not like .001 gram of T will cost you thousands of dollars. And since, at least, natural T leads to reduced violence and crime, I see no reason to believe that unnatural T would do anything but make people even less violent.
but sadly all of them involve at least a little moving, so I guess everyone will have to continue taking supplements.
In a regulated taxi service you have rules and regulations to adhere to in order to maintain your taxi cab license, so you follow those rules.
Which is why we have Uber, because the cabby system in 99% of the world, including the US is a complete joke riddled with corruption and just generally bad service. Should we not have save, clean, accessible public transit? Yes, that is why Uber sprang into being, even though it is strictly outlawed, because there is a great demand that is not being filled. They are not perfect, but they very well might be better than existing systems, and possibly they will shake up the system enough to fix the problems with the existing legal cabby system. There is no doubt that Uber is Sketchy, what is in doubt is are they any more sketchy than the cabby system?
Well I think there is an argument of even what system they were using.
It seems to me that the government decided to impose an unnatural monopoly, to make a few people really rich, so that they would have the incentive to protect the system. Yes, the government did impose a monopoly, but it also failed to put in any other real regulations, instead trusting to the enlightened self interest of a bunch of rich "fat cats". Instead the fat cats decided that since they already had the monopoly that they did not need to do anything to keep their cheques rolling in. So like so many things nowadays, it really is the failure of the bastard child of both capitalism and socialism. It failed because it contained none of the checks and balances of either system.
The freedom of movement is a right. It absolutely is the governments responsibility to ensure that regardless of your color, religion, or economic situation you are allowed to go downtown, get to a hospital, or your job. And that is not something that AirBB invented. that is just generic survey taking etiquette. Psychology has known how completely useless the results of any and all surveys are if you show any summery or even individual results before the completion of said survey, for a long time now.
But can it handle HEVC?
"This was designed to be a learning tool for students and hobbyists, not a set top multimedia box." If that was true it would not have anywhere near the specs it has. It has on the order of 2000 times the power of a student learning device. And Other for profit boards are available at the same price with over double the specs. Enough specs to actually function decently.
Typically the point of a corporation is for the corporate assets and bank account to grow. Not for it is break even at the end of the year. What you are talking about is typically how a non-profit runs. A non-profit does not necessarily have to increasing its assets of bank balance year after year, instead it often balances the budget and pays as much in salaries as it takes in.
I am completely against any sort of tax system where the government does this. If you do not like the corporations using loopholes in your laws close or heavily tax the loop holes. But don't just randomly throw a tax at people. The government should not have the power to randomly tax anyone it wants, any amount, at any length of notice it wants to give. If these assets should be taxed, then tax them annually.
This is the "Pew" Research Center. They cannot be that well respected.
No one really cares about such a little incident. No one is going to go through the hassle of changing providers because some minimum wage employee was a little rude while not even talking to customers.
The best thing to happen to the Wheel of Time series was Robert Jordan's death.
It is a seesaw between reducing supply and letting all poor people freeze to death because they cannot economically compete with the rich.
If we cannot break your encryption, we can always break your knees.
they have to get a warrant.
Hahaha, how naive you are.
Well, there are some arguments about it in theory. There are legitimate points to be made. And one universal truth is that there is loads of areas to be improved in how our legal system handles and defines crimes. But, no one personally is sympathetic to them, it is all theoretical.
And I really do not see where you are coming from. How does it create demand? Are there Pedophiles making a killing off of ads or subscriptions? I sort of get the impression it is more about enthusiastic individuals who do it because that is what they love, and they get a thrill of video taping and posting it. They are not some sort of business man or entertainer, who are just in it for the money or applause.
Well that is the benefit of being Anonymous, 0 accountability.
I don't buy it for a second.
"sympathetic"? No one is sympathetic to pedophiles.
But the issue is not accessing system memory, it is how you market it.
Best viewed with IE is at least in some way not something the web designer arbitrarily decided. Particularly back in the day, loads of web programming only worked well on the browser it was specifically designed for. Using another could create a worst user experience. This is goign out of your way to make third party apps not work, and banning the user of said apps.
It worked out pretty well for all those mns messenger apps, including one that used the same name.
You are the one making allegations without proof, and not even providing enough information to look up the evidence you apparently saw. If you are interested in Zoe Quinn, follow her twitter, read her old tweets, come to your own conclusions.