Why? As long as the car knows the limits of the abilities, it's a tier above human drivers. That's Volvo's goal: not to be able to work in every possible condition, but to pull safely off the road when it can't. That's enough to allow the human to stop paying attention.
Automated cars just need to become as good as an average human who is paying attention, awake, and sober. That will make them better than 80% of the cars on the road. Good enough for mass use at that point.
Some businesses might...but with HIPAA laws, banking laws and lawyers, the security of "in the cloud" no matter how secure, might put some people off on this.
It doesn't matter how secure it is, it matters how secure the auditors say it is. A startup will do quite poorly by this measure, while the companies with years of good lobbying will have arranged things so that it's fine.
These aren't taxes on activities that happened in America. If they decided to incorporate in e.g. the Caymans, they'd still owe US tax on US activities, just like today, but they wouldn't owe US tax on stuff made, shipped, and consumed in Europe, like they do today.
The GOP establishment is not conservative. Hasn't been for 20 years. The Dem establishment isn't liberal. Hasn't been for 20 years. They're two faces of the same party, who's only agenda is protecting the financial interest of their donors.
But I take it that's not news to you, so your question seems odd.
I just don't feel the need to own everything in the world to be happy.
How's your retirement savings going? How would if be if the government took it on a whim? That's the ehart of conservatism in America - a government without the power to fuck you.
the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness
Conservatives give more to charity, and all of progressivism is the search for moral superiority. But I bet that quote was from the 80s (or before), the era of televangelists, before the parties swapped the role of moral scold.
You have the worst case of Trump Derangement Syndrome of anyone on/., just so you know. For your own mental health, become less emotionally involved in all this before you have a breakdown.
That partizan nonsense if falling for political theater. Both parties equally fuck over the average citizen to give more money to their donors. Not business in general - no pay, no play. Their used to be a bigger distinction between the two, if just which businesses they fought for. But that distinction has largely vanished, and the donors mostly give to both parties.
You basic premise is just wrong. The establishment uniparty is neither fascist nor socialist - they just don't care. They care about enriching their donors. They care about growing the power of the state to enrich their donors.
Don't confuse fee-for-advice financial planners with the crooks at full-service brokerages. You describe the later, but most people (even near retirement) don't have the wealth to attract those sharks.
Actual financial planners, or just plain old-school investment advice, has you mostly out of stocks at retirement. I can't vouch for "keep your age as a percentage in bonds", but it's very common advice.
, I want stop complaining about Trump. He's neither a conservative nor Republican,
He's not establishment conservative nor Republican. He's very much channeling the political will of the American working class, plus those of us fed up with the corruptness and political theater of the "establishment-media complex".
Establishment Republicans, Democrats, and the old-school media (but I repeat myself) are all utterly dismissive of a very large chunk of voters in this democracy, talking down to them, calling them ignorant and racist, and in general saying "let them eat cake". A sentiment frequently repeated by Slashdot posters, I might add.
Fuck that. Trump may be far from my ideal candidate, much like Bernie was, but the vast hatred for him by the establishment, and all the self-described elite who think they're just better people than those working class brutes, demonstrates he's a "good enough" choice. I'm not a big Trump fan, but I loath the modern hipster-pseudo-intellectual progressive crowd, so: you go Trump, kick some ass.
I don't know a single gen Z that is conservative, not a single one, and I live in the middle of the red-state midwest.
It's quite rare for kids to be conservative. Rarer now that schools have become progressive indoctrination facilities. People tend to become conservative around 30, once they have a job, a family, a mortgage, and generally become stakeholders in the country.
The mainstream of the Dems and GOP is the same party - the Deep State. They have the same goals - protect the financial interests of large donors (most of which donate to both parties, of course). They stage these pretend-fights to give have of the entirely corrupt crowd cover on any given vote.
The Dems won the toss, and got cover for this enriching of donors. It means little.
Both parties have outsiders trying to overturn the Deep State. You can see the old-school media is 100% onboard with the uniparty by how they treat the likes of Trump and Bernie.
Trump and Bernie aren't faking. They desire actual change to this whole fucked-up corrupt system. Don't fall for the extreme-izing, the other-ing of these guys. They both have a lot of support from mainstream America. And stop being taken in by political theater.
2 seats in a theatre. With a 75 foot screen and high-tech sound.
I like the experience of watching a movie at home better than in the theater. I have a plenty big screen and like my sound system. I also have better snacks and no one talking turning the movie.
$30 to watch a newish movie in your own home is terrible value when compared to literally every other in-home viewing option. This will interest some folks, but I suspect not very many.
I think you'll find that people with good home theater set-ups, and people for whom $30 doesn't even register as an expense overlap considerably. Not everyone is a broke student, after all.
However, there is an important distinction to be made between a media company
That's the exact point the SCOTUS considered and rejected. What about political blogs? Just in general, if you give the government the power to decide which corporation is and is not in some special category when it comes to free speech, you've ended free speech. Surely you can see that? If we trusted the government not to abuse its power, we wouldn't need a constitution in the first place.
Slashdot Mirror
Why? As long as the car knows the limits of the abilities, it's a tier above human drivers. That's Volvo's goal: not to be able to work in every possible condition, but to pull safely off the road when it can't. That's enough to allow the human to stop paying attention.
Automated cars just need to become as good as an average human who is paying attention, awake, and sober. That will make them better than 80% of the cars on the road. Good enough for mass use at that point.
Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
Well, if you discover the answer to that for Tom "Barbara" Hudson, let us know. :)
Geez, would you guys just get a room!
Some businesses might...but with HIPAA laws, banking laws and lawyers, the security of "in the cloud" no matter how secure, might put some people off on this.
It doesn't matter how secure it is, it matters how secure the auditors say it is. A startup will do quite poorly by this measure, while the companies with years of good lobbying will have arranged things so that it's fine.
And how efficient and/or popular is your scripting language douche-nozzle?
Scripting language? I directly edit the memory of a running process with a hex editor to do what I want. Kids these days.
When people ask "What would Jesus do?", they should not forget that flipping over tables and chasing people around with a whip is one of the options.
As long as the targets are bankers, would anyone really complain?
Conservatives didn't vote that way. The GOP did. How is that unclear in any way?
The engine devs are not the language authors. I think the language authors are idiots, too, but not for any reason related to this story.
Yeah, my old Commodore 64 had a blinking cursor, and it somehow managed that remarkable feat with an 8-bit 6510 CPU running at 1MHz!!!
Behold the power of Javascript! It gives a modern PC with 8-16 GHz of total CPU ... less actualy processing power than a Commodore 64.
Well done JS engine guys. Well done.
These aren't taxes on activities that happened in America. If they decided to incorporate in e.g. the Caymans, they'd still owe US tax on US activities, just like today, but they wouldn't owe US tax on stuff made, shipped, and consumed in Europe, like they do today.
It's the tax system that's fucked up here.
The GOP establishment is not conservative. Hasn't been for 20 years. The Dem establishment isn't liberal. Hasn't been for 20 years. They're two faces of the same party, who's only agenda is protecting the financial interest of their donors.
But I take it that's not news to you, so your question seems odd.
I just don't feel the need to own everything in the world to be happy.
How's your retirement savings going? How would if be if the government took it on a whim? That's the ehart of conservatism in America - a government without the power to fuck you.
the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness
Conservatives give more to charity, and all of progressivism is the search for moral superiority. But I bet that quote was from the 80s (or before), the era of televangelists, before the parties swapped the role of moral scold.
You have the worst case of Trump Derangement Syndrome of anyone on /., just so you know. For your own mental health, become less emotionally involved in all this before you have a breakdown.
You should have prefaced that comment with your age. Also "conservative" and the party you vote for are different things.
The oldquote is "If you're under 30 and conservative, you have no heart. If you're over 30 and liberal you have no money."
Look at any parliamentary government in Europe. 37% is about the size of the typical dominant party. 37% is a huge voting block.
That partizan nonsense if falling for political theater. Both parties equally fuck over the average citizen to give more money to their donors. Not business in general - no pay, no play. Their used to be a bigger distinction between the two, if just which businesses they fought for. But that distinction has largely vanished, and the donors mostly give to both parties.
You basic premise is just wrong. The establishment uniparty is neither fascist nor socialist - they just don't care. They care about enriching their donors. They care about growing the power of the state to enrich their donors.
Don't confuse fee-for-advice financial planners with the crooks at full-service brokerages. You describe the later, but most people (even near retirement) don't have the wealth to attract those sharks.
Actual financial planners, or just plain old-school investment advice, has you mostly out of stocks at retirement. I can't vouch for "keep your age as a percentage in bonds", but it's very common advice.
, I want stop complaining about Trump. He's neither a conservative nor Republican,
He's not establishment conservative nor Republican. He's very much channeling the political will of the American working class, plus those of us fed up with the corruptness and political theater of the "establishment-media complex".
Establishment Republicans, Democrats, and the old-school media (but I repeat myself) are all utterly dismissive of a very large chunk of voters in this democracy, talking down to them, calling them ignorant and racist, and in general saying "let them eat cake". A sentiment frequently repeated by Slashdot posters, I might add.
Fuck that. Trump may be far from my ideal candidate, much like Bernie was, but the vast hatred for him by the establishment, and all the self-described elite who think they're just better people than those working class brutes, demonstrates he's a "good enough" choice. I'm not a big Trump fan, but I loath the modern hipster-pseudo-intellectual progressive crowd, so: you go Trump, kick some ass.
I don't know a single gen Z that is conservative, not a single one, and I live in the middle of the red-state midwest.
It's quite rare for kids to be conservative. Rarer now that schools have become progressive indoctrination facilities. People tend to become conservative around 30, once they have a job, a family, a mortgage, and generally become stakeholders in the country.
Stop being taken in by political theater.
The mainstream of the Dems and GOP is the same party - the Deep State. They have the same goals - protect the financial interests of large donors (most of which donate to both parties, of course). They stage these pretend-fights to give have of the entirely corrupt crowd cover on any given vote.
The Dems won the toss, and got cover for this enriching of donors. It means little.
Both parties have outsiders trying to overturn the Deep State. You can see the old-school media is 100% onboard with the uniparty by how they treat the likes of Trump and Bernie.
Trump and Bernie aren't faking. They desire actual change to this whole fucked-up corrupt system. Don't fall for the extreme-izing, the other-ing of these guys. They both have a lot of support from mainstream America. And stop being taken in by political theater.
2 seats in a theatre. With a 75 foot screen and high-tech sound.
I like the experience of watching a movie at home better than in the theater. I have a plenty big screen and like my sound system. I also have better snacks and no one talking turning the movie.
$30 to watch a newish movie in your own home is terrible value when compared to literally every other in-home viewing option. This will interest some folks, but I suspect not very many.
I think you'll find that people with good home theater set-ups, and people for whom $30 doesn't even register as an expense overlap considerably. Not everyone is a broke student, after all.
However, there is an important distinction to be made between a media company
That's the exact point the SCOTUS considered and rejected. What about political blogs? Just in general, if you give the government the power to decide which corporation is and is not in some special category when it comes to free speech, you've ended free speech. Surely you can see that? If we trusted the government not to abuse its power, we wouldn't need a constitution in the first place.
Not one of us! Not one of us! *screeches and points*