Slashdot Mirror


Google Contemplating Removing Chrome 'Close Other Tabs' and 'Close Tabs to the Right' Options (bleepingcomputer.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Chrome engineers are planning to remove two options from Chrome that allow users to quickly close a large number of tabs with just a few clicks. The options, named "Close other tabs" and "Close tabs to the right" reside in the menu that appears when a user right-clicks on a Chrome tab. According to an issue on the Chromium project spotted yesterday by a Reddit user, Google engineers planned to remove to menu options for many years even before opening the Chromium issue, dated itself to July 31, 2015. After several years of inactivity and no decision, things started to move again in September 2016, when usage statistics confirmed that Chrome users rarely used the two options they initially wanted to remove. Seeing no new discussions past this point, Chromium engineers assigned the issue in February, meaning engineers are getting ready to remove the two menu options it in future Chromium builds.

266 comments

  1. And the print option? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When are they going to remove the Print option from the context menu? I'd bet usage data shows this getting clicked all the time but every single one of those clicks was from someone who wanted to press Search. It's the most useless feature around.

    1. Re:And the print option? by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Errm, there is no search option in the context menu, so why would people be clicking print in the context menu when they want to search?

    2. Re:And the print option? by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 2

      Quite often I want to "print" a page to PDF. But I suppose, to me it's a moot point as long as we still have the keyboard shortcuts that I rely on instead. I didn't even know where in the context menu Find and Print are located. For find, I'm going to be typing what I want to find anyway, so I might as well use the keyboard shortcut to start the search.

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    3. Re:And the print option? by Cigarra · · Score: 2

      Of course there is, but it's in the context menu for text selection. Quite useful for looking up name or specific phrases from a page you're reading.

      --
      I don't have a sig.
    4. Re:And the print option? by Yalius · · Score: 2

      Totally off-topic here, but I just want to say that I appreciate you using the phrase "moot point" as opposed to "mute point." Such a rare thing to see someone use the phrase correctly. Kudos.

    5. Re:And the print option? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You should of written koudou's.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:And the print option? by lucm · · Score: 1

      Your spelling it wrong.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    7. Re: And the print option? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no reason to remove anything, to hide clutter, hide some items unless shift is down. Windows explorer has done this since 2000.

    8. Re:And the print option? by Jethro99 · · Score: 1

      rong actually.

  2. I use them quite a lot by Harold+Halloway · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As someone who tends to open new links in a new tab and who ends up with a dozen or so open, I've always found those options to be very useful, especially the 'Close Tabs to the Right' one. I'm not sure why Google would want to get rid of them - the options hardly seem like a security risk or a burden on processor or RAM resources. I'll miss them if they do disappear.

    1. Re:I use them quite a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone will write an extension to add them back.

    2. Re:I use them quite a lot by Harold+Halloway · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that will be the case.

    3. Re:I use them quite a lot by smelch · · Score: 2

      As somebody who is constantly having Visual Studio open new tabs in chrome, Close tabs to the right is fantastic.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    4. Re:I use them quite a lot by uberdilligaff · · Score: 2

      Exactly right. Google something, right-click-open-in-new-tab a bunch of interesting looking sites, then easily close them all down when you're finished. I use these very useful features multiple times every day. Please don't kill them.

      --
      Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain. --Friederich Schiller
    5. Re:I use them quite a lot by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      You could also just say: "Noooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

    6. Re:I use them quite a lot by joelgrimes · · Score: 4, Informative

      Close other tabs is fairly trivial to replace. Just drag the tab out and kill the original window. I'll miss close-to-the-right.

    7. Re:I use them quite a lot by wrp103 · · Score: 1

      Exactly right. Google something, right-click-open-in-new-tab a bunch of interesting looking sites, then easily close them all down when you're finished. I use these very useful features multiple times every day. Please don't kill them.

      That is exactly what I do, several times a day, so I would miss that feature. What is the motivation for the change?

      Actually, if somebody writes an extension to put them back, it would be the best of both worlds. Those of us who use the feature will have it available, while those who don't use it will be running a leaner browser. (not sure how much leaner, though. ;^)

    8. Re:I use them quite a lot by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure why Google would want to get rid of them

      Because everyone is all about "minimalism!!!" these days, and Chrome is the poster child of this. I'm actually surprised these features have lasted this long, or even got in there in the first place.

      Go back 15 years and look at the UIs we used to have: we have far more features than today. Now everything needs to be designed to run on a small tablet screen and operated with your thumbs.

    9. Re:I use them quite a lot by CanEHdian · · Score: 1

      Let me guess... you're an intermediate to advanced user and do not let Google spy on you. Yeah, then they won't see how/what gets used by that class of users. Just Grandma going on facebook to see her grandchildren.

      --
      When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
    10. Re:I use them quite a lot by Frobnicator · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The story says the engineers found it was used rarely, citing that as the reason for removal.

      However, doing something rarely does not mean it is used never, nor does it mean removal is appropriate.

      I rarely use a fire extinguisher, yet I keep one in my kitchen and my vehicle. I rarely use my window shutters, but I'm absolutely glad the house has them as they can save a fortune during a storm. I rarely print documents, but I still maintain a printer.

      Just because it is rarely used does not mean it isn't useful, nor does it mean it should be removed.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    11. Re:I use them quite a lot by Altrag · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In TFA, it even has a ranking of several features. Close to the right is used more than say, Mute Tab.

      And they're still keeping "bookmark all tabs", a feature with 1/10th the usage of Close to the right.

      Makes you wonder if someone in the "feature"-assigning group is on Microsoft's payroll. Chrome and FF keep removing features and getting slower while MS at least is trying to make a useful browser (pretty unsuccessfully so far but hey if all they have to do is wait for the competition to implode, they'll still win at the end of the day!)

    12. Re:I use them quite a lot by aknowles · · Score: 5, Informative

      Close tabs to the right can be achieved by clicking the first tab, shift clicking the last and then control-w (or -w on mac) since I found out about this (from reading the bug report at https://bugs.chromium.org/p/ch...) I'm less upset about the menu items going away.

    13. Re:I use them quite a lot by joelgrimes · · Score: 1

      That's helpful. Thank you.

    14. Re:I use them quite a lot by Frobnicator · · Score: 1

      Actually, if somebody writes an extension to put them back, it would be the best of both worlds.

      The features are not available in the APIs, so no extension can re-implement it.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    15. Re:I use them quite a lot by antek9 · · Score: 1

      In that case Google better put them into the API. These functions clearly are available under Firefox, I'm using an add-on that puts them (among many more, e.g. Close Left Tabs, Mute Tab, Duplicate Tab and so on) into the context menu, it's called Tab Mix Plus. I use these functions all the time and have no idea why Google would want to cripple Chrome even more.

      --
      A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
      Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
    16. Re:I use them quite a lot by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      You could also just say: "Noooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

      When asked to use Chrome? Absolutely!

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    17. Re:I use them quite a lot by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Dammit, that means Chromefox will lose them too. I don't really care what Chrome does since I only use it for printing, but everything they do ends up being done to Chromefox as well.

    18. Re:I use them quite a lot by xQx · · Score: 1

      You've raised great points.

      Let's start a change.org partition asking Google to remove:

      - Bookmark all tabs
      - Mute tab
      - Unmute tab
      - Close tabs to the right
      - Close other tabs

      Clearly, they do nothing but clutter the interface for about 95% of users.

    19. Re:I use them quite a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know a lot of programmers who rarely use their dicks. I don't think they're jumping up and down to remove them, though.

    20. Re:I use them quite a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure that will be the case.

      Actually, it won't. That is not exposed to extension-writers with the API.

      Here is the "bug", and the person who is closing off discussion is pkasting@chromium.org, who I am sure would love his inbox full of everyone's heartfelt responses.

    21. Re:I use them quite a lot by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      This is what I do too. It's essentially HOW I BROWSE, not just something I do on an infrequent basis. :/

    22. Re:I use them quite a lot by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I was surprised when the "close tabs to the right" feature appeared in Firefox, Chrome AND Opera in essentially the same form. The guiding principle these browser designers follow is MAKE IT DIFFERENT JUST BECAUSE. Let's be honest here, none of them are really following a trial of features and time-testing them. It's just GUI fad after fad after fad. They're sh*tcanning the close tabs feature so they can proudly claim to be different again.

    23. Re:I use them quite a lot by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I think there's a lot of truth here. We see it in so many other stupid UI fads too, especially the whole flat-UI trend that's been going on for 4-5 years now I think. These designers are all part of a big cargo cult, not experts putting real thought and feedback data into their design decisions.

    24. Re:I use them quite a lot by mcswell · · Score: 2

      Google doesn't care about you, you're the exception to their statistics. I'm the exception to some of their other statistics, and they don't care about me either. For example, I actually used the '+' to indicate in Google Search that I want a particular term to actually appear in the results. They say you can use double quotes, but (a) that isn't as convenient, and (b) double quotes mean something else, particularly when used to group words into a phrase.

      You can also see Google's (non-)response to users in forums when the users complained about changes to Google News and Google Maps. The company simply ignored the users, even though the outcry was quite vociferous.

      Of course Google isn't alone in this. Microsoft Office's obligatory use of the Ribbon made some of us mad, and they just ignored us. (Unlike LibreOffice, which recently added a ribbon, but kept the menus--which are actually the reason I use LO instead of MsOffice at home.) And Adobe has introduced the worst UI I've ever seen in their recent versions of Acrobat. Only when the outcry becomes tumultuous do these companies seem to listen--the reversion of Windows10 to something more like (if still not as good as) the Windows7 interface is a rare example.

    25. Re:I use them quite a lot by mcswell · · Score: 1

      Amen, brother, preach it! http://www.atlasobscura.com/pl...

    26. Re:I use them quite a lot by kuzb · · Score: 1

      I too don't understand this applesque move. It costs them nothing to keep the features. I use these two options a lot to clean up unused tabs quickly.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    27. Re: I use them quite a lot by p91paul · · Score: 2

      Be prepared to lose all that, Firefox is breaking this kind of extensions in favor of Chrome-like ones...

    28. Re:I use them quite a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the motivation for the change?

      Wild guess: limit the amount of code to maintain.

    29. Re:I use them quite a lot by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Except the use of a feature does not relate to its importance. There are many ways to close multiple tabs quickly or in batch or split Windows and close Windows of tabs.

      There are only 2 ways to bookmark all your tabs and one is really slow.

    30. Re:I use them quite a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use opera 12.18 , not "risk or a burden on processor or RAM resources."

    31. Re: I use them quite a lot by Frobnicator · · Score: 1

      There's a Demotivator poster for that. Or maybe this one is more likely.

      Either way, it is clearly not what the customers on /. want.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    32. Re:I use them quite a lot by strikethree · · Score: 1

      The story says the engineers found it was used rarely, citing that as the reason for removal.

      This bothers me. Is Chrome sending "telemetry"? I do not recall agreeing to send telemetry to Google.

      What about Chromium? Who would Chromium be sending the data to? If it is sending data by default, why?

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    33. Re:I use them quite a lot by Radiophobic · · Score: 1

      You can select groups of tabs and drag them to a new window, much in the same way.

    34. Re:I use them quite a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had no idea you could select tabs like that - super tip!

      I wonder whether the people who use those options are techy people who have also disabled telemetry.

    35. Re: I use them quite a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would I do that on my Win8 tablet?

    36. Re:I use them quite a lot by persicom · · Score: 1

      Just sent my email

    37. Re:I use them quite a lot by toddestan · · Score: 1

      You're using a browser that's created by the world's largest advertising company. Why do you think they would even create a browser? Why do you think Chrome is bundled with so many other installers that try to trick you into installing it? Of course it's spying on you.

      It really amazes me that anyone actually uses Chrome.

  3. What I want back by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Vertical tabs.

    --
    They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
    1. Re:What I want back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Vivaldi is what you want then.

    2. Re:What I want back by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Remember the good old days, when software companies added features that the user base wanted? It's true - many moons ago, the great software companies wanted to please their users, instead of their "designers". It was a grand old time.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:What I want back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than 3 months of Chrome history.

    4. Re:What I want back by lucm · · Score: 1

      The current menu is breaking the Designer Dogma, which mandates to never have more than 5 options. These menu items have to go.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    5. Re:What I want back by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The good old days of menus which filled up an entire screen with shit most people never use? Yeah i remember the bad old days. Those days computers were considered complicated, users of computers were considered nerds, and rightly so for the bloody degree or certifications you need to show you were able to use one.

    6. Re:What I want back by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      That's weird. Neither I, nor most other kids had too many issues with learning them. I didn't have anybody to teach me either. Older people just don't want to have to learn new things. One of our users told one of our technicians (who is in her late fifties) that she was 51 and too old to learn how to use two monitors.

    7. Re:What I want back by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      Or the TabCenter center plugin, which is part of Mozilla's TestPilot program.

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
    8. Re:What I want back by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      I am 49 and finally had the kit to do dual monitors last year. Won't go back if I had a choice.

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
    9. Re:What I want back by lgw · · Score: 1

      Not one of us! Not one of us! *screeches and points*

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re:What I want back by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That's weird. Neither I, nor most other kids had too many issues with learning them.

      Congratulations, you should write that on a certificate. In the mean time we have dramatically shifted the level of involvement of the population with computers. Maybe not everyone is as gifted as you. Well given you're on slashdot, a special interest forum for the technically minded I can almost assure you that your own personal experience is in no way representative of the people who now use computers.

  4. Huh? I use these all the time. by bfwebster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't be the only person who uses these on a regular basis.

    Unless...I am.

    Mind. Blown.

    No, seriously. Is usage that rare? Because I do use these a lot. ..bruce..

    --
    Bruce F. Webster (brucefwebster.com)
    1. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      You are not alone. I use them frequently

    2. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

      It's fucking stupid. It's rarely needed function that is rarely used. IT'S STILL NEEDED. Clearing cookies is rarely needed as well, but they're not going to remove that (yet, I'm sure they'll say something like "keep your cookies in the cloud")

      I'm sure the real reasoning behind this is to pad their usage stats. Chrome users spend 25% more time on your website and spend $fake_dollars more!

    3. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      I just select the tabs that I want to close in gang (either with shift or ctrl/cmd) and then close them either with ctrl/cmd-w or a right click. For me it would be very rare that I want to close all but a single tab.

      But I admit that I'm weird. I still can't completely let go of Firefox because of Tree Style Tabs. Tabs on the top is madness! :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a counterpoint I didn't even know they were there. Crazy right? Now that this has brought them to my attention I may find a use for them, just in time for them to disappear.

    5. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by gweilo8888 · · Score: 1

      Nope, not crazy in the least. I've been using Chrome as my daily driver since it first came out (like, literally the first day it was released to the public), and I work online so I spend upwards of 8-10 hours per day in my browser. Had no idea these features existed, wouldn't have used them if I did, won't use them now and won't miss them in the least, though.

    6. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. I don't have a particular opinion on the removal or not, because it's easier to flick around with your left hand anyway. These hotkeys aren't really exotic or fringe, they're pretty core, a tick away from copy and paste.

    7. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 0

      Seriously, that's fucking gay. Close the window to close tabs. Seriously?

    8. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Nope, not crazy in the least. I've been using Chrome as my daily driver since it first came out (like, literally the first day it was released to the public), and I work online so I spend upwards of 8-10 hours per day in my browser. Had no idea these features existed, wouldn't have used them if I did, won't use them now and won't miss them in the least, though.

      I found them before, but the correct option I would be looking for is "Close tabs to the left". Those are the older tabs. I've moved on, my attention is on the new thing and I want the others to go away. The "Close tabs to the right" has never been useful to me. Why not add the left option? There's plenty of space.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    9. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by EvilSS · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can't be the only person who uses these on a regular basis.

      Unless...I am.

      According to their telemetry, yes, you are the only one.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    10. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Use it all the time.... google some code related thing, open a half dozen tabs, read them then want to repeat, go back to google tab then close all tabs to the right.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    11. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      IT'S STILL NEEDED

      Nope. It's WANTED. Not needed. There's many ways to close tabs.

      Clearing cookies is rarely needed as well

      This IS needed. It is a form of user protection. There's no other option to clear cookies other than this.

      I'm sure the real reasoning behind this is to pad their usage stats.

      I'm sure the reason for this is removing a rarely used option that there's no point in maintaining the code in the menu for, or in the underlying system.

    12. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use 'close other tabs' all the time, typically in the following situation:

      I've been opening tabs and reading/working all day. At some point I'll open a new tab (personal/entertainment) and close all the stuff I've been working on the entire day so I can focus on that one new tab .

      Captcha: Fellatio

    13. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by InfectedPacket · · Score: 1

      I'm quite sure it wouldn't be hard for someone knowledgeable in developing Google extensions to create one to add these 2 options back. Seems like the steps here could do the trick.

      --
      @cyberrecce
    14. Re: Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure that everyone that's using it isn't sending usage statistics to Google, so they'll never know.

    15. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by urbanriot · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking when I read this post. I can't comprehend that most power users *aren't* using this function. I would stop using a browser entirely if it dropped 'close other tabs' but closing tabs to the right is a fundamental aspect of my work-related browsing.

    16. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most people correct the first letter of a misspelled word by DELETING EVERYTHING UP DO THAT POINT. usage is rare because they HAD NO IDEA THEY COULD USE THOSE.

    17. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i use firefox which has the same menuitmes. I didn't know about them lol. TBH I close down the whole app, I browse too much anyway.

    18. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by swillden · · Score: 1

      It's fucking stupid. It's rarely needed function that is rarely used. IT'S STILL NEEDED.

      I use "close tabs to right" all the time[1], myself, so I hope this doesn't go away. That said, I disagree with your idea that if something is rarely used it should be kept. Your other example (clearing cookies) is a bad one because there is no other way to do that, but in this case tabs can be -- and generally are -- closed one at a time, and in fact Chrome is careful to move the tabs around so that the close button for the next tab is under your cursor when you close one. This means that "close to the right" can also be done by moving your mouse to the "x" on the first tab to remove, then tapping the mouse button rapidly until all of them are gone. Unless you have more than the 20-30 tabs that I typically have open, that's really not so terrible. Plus, as others in this thread have pointed out, you can multi-select tabs then batch close them that way. There are other reasonably-good ways to achieve the goal, so if this is one is rarely used, there's no way to argue that it's actually necessary.

      As for why to remove it... features cost. Every feature you keep in a product is a feature that has to be maintained and tested. Development and testing resources are not infinite -- not even at Google -- and the accumulated burden of lots of old and rarely-used features gradually slows progress on new features, security fixes, etc. It makes a great deal of sense to remove features that aren't used much and which have more often-used alternatives.

      [1] My normal browsing style is to open every link in a new tab, and to use Ctrl-W to go "back". So my tab bar ends up being a breadcrumb trail of my path through a web site, and when I'm done with something I close the "site" with "close tabs to right". I also keep a couple of pinned tabs (email and calendar, in that order), so when I want to close "everything" I've been doing, I "close tabs to right" on the calendar tab.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    19. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      I use Chrome daily and never knew it was an option. But then again I'm not of those hoarders who has hundreds of tabs open.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    20. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by bengoerz · · Score: 1

      I am one of those hoarders who has hundreds of tabs open, and I never knew this was an option.

      To close many tabs at once, I just moused-over the leftmost one and center-click rapidly until they are all closed.

    21. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if people know that this is even an option.

    22. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by swillden · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the real reasoning behind this is to pad their usage stats. Chrome users spend 25% more time on your website and spend $fake_dollars more!

      Padding usage stats in this way would be a bad idea for Google, because it would appear to sites that Chrome users spend more time on their sites... but spend less per unit of time (because no one buys from an idle background tab), making the Chrome user base appear to be less desirable than the user base of other browsers.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    23. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      I have used close-to-right only once, a long time ago. Here are two similar things I currently often do:

      1. Close all -- just click the little close box. Saves a few clicks over the close all tabs.

      2. Close all but one -- grab the tab and pull it out into another window, then alt-tab back and click the close box on the previous window.

      Easy, faster, and completely intuitive.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    24. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Until I saw this article, I've never realized there was a close tabs to the right. I knew there was a close other tabs, but I don't think I've ever used it.

    25. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use them every fucking day. I organize my tabs so my important, always open apps (email, gmail (for hangouts. fuck that new shit), social media, and everything that opens to the right is stuff I go through during the day. If it's something I need to reference later, I drag it to the left and once I'm done, I close all to the right. I hate having more than 10+ tabs open usually (but it happens).

    26. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't really get why I'd need to use them. I usually just ctrl-W my way around the tabs

      I'm a single window person myself though. Very rarely do I open a second window.

    27. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't use these options in chrome/chromium at all. never. not once.

      i use them *every single day* in firefox though. here's hoping they don't copy this change.

    28. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is ... metrics, power users turn off metrics usage

    29. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Lyrael · · Score: 1

      Ditto. Kind of mad to be finding out about these just as they're getting ready to remove it!

    30. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Ginguin · · Score: 1

      I did not know this was an option, but I immediately fell in love with it. Thank you, MightyYar!

      --
      "Anything you say can and will be used against you in a targeted advertisement" - Adam Harvey
    31. Re: Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure that everyone that's using it isn't sending usage statistics to Google, so they'll never know.

      That's what this is really about. They are going to start pulling features that they know people use, but which are primarily used by the people Smart enough not to feed usage stats back to Google. It's all a plan to get people to turn on usage tracking.

      Basically it's a "Oh, you like that feature? It'd be a shame if something.... happened... to it."

    32. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Among the power user crowd it may be well used but if one can opt out of such statistics or sending usage data to google it may not even be getting communicated to them, viva la privacy.

    33. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by capebretonsux · · Score: 1

      2. Close all but one -- grab the tab and pull it out into another window, then alt-tab back and click the close box on the previous window.

      As opposed to 'right-click, close other tabs'? Not easier, and not faster, sorry.

      Close to the right I've never used, however, but I can see how it'd be useful. My chromebook is slowly becoming more and more irritating to use, the worst offender being the constant tab reloading whenever I switch tabs back and forth with no option to turn it off. Memory usage has rarely ever been a concern, but it keeps dumping them as soon as I switch tabs anyways. Irritating. Makes me wonder who tests new changes in regards to usability.

    34. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did not even notice there was a context menu when you right click tabs :)

    35. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use both of these, but especially Close Tabs to Right, every. single. day. It's rare that I don't have 8-10 tabs open, especially when I've been looking for something like equipment reviews, or a solution to some problem. I just right-click to Open Link in New Tab, and then scoot through tabs until I've found what I want or I've learned enough. It's very handy to be able to wipe all those tabs out with a single click.

      Please, Google Engineers, re-consider. Don't just go by raw statistics; consider your most savvy users, the ones who are using all of the awesome power you've built into your browser engine.

    36. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      According to their telemetry, yes, you are the only one.

      Odds are, people who use advanced features are more likely to turn data harvesting off. Thus making those metrics questionable. Then again, anyone who is opposed to being monitored is not part of the Google's target audience.

    37. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by kfh227 · · Score: 1

      Usage is probably rare. But holy crap. Is it ever useful when you need it. I'd imagine that the software design is object oriented enough that this should not be causing bugs at all. Why on earth remove it?

    38. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do I; clearly the goog is on some other agenda.

    39. Re: Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I usually start in the middle of my tabs and work outwards, so I'd like to close them in an inwards direction to keep me focused on my original task.

    40. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usage is probably rare by the kind of users that don't turn off sending usage statistics and crash reports to Google.

      For myself I've never used close to the right, but close other tabs...everyday, multiple times.

    41. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by hey! · · Score: 1

      This gets down to something that used to be a common UI design principle before software became so feature-ful it became impractical: manifest interface.

      The idea of a manifest interface (which also is a principle in language and API design) is that if the software has a capability you should be able to see it. You shouldn't have to root around to stumble upon it. Tabs follow this principle; there's enough visual and behavioral cues to suggest that you need to click on a tab. The little "x" in the tab also follows this principle.

      But context menus you access by right-clicking break this rule, which means that there may be millions of people laboriously clicking on "x" after "x", unaware that they can make all the extraneous tabs in their browser disappear with just two clicks.

      This, by the way, is why Macintoshes were designed with one button on the mouse. But even Mac UI designers couldn't get by with just single and double-click, so you have option-click too, bit by in large you could operate most programs without it.

      Anyhow, to make sure people know about this kind of feature, your program is going to have to watch their behavior and suggest they try right clicking. But that way lies Clippy...

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    42. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT'S STILL NEEDED

      Nope. It's WANTED. Not needed. There's many ways to close tabs.

      Sure, it's wanted, but then again so is the option to close a single tab. You could just make do with close windows.

      But all of those features are needed for certain people's workflows, and there's little reason to do away with them.

    43. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by lannocc · · Score: 1

      This IS needed. It is a form of user protection. There's no other option to clear cookies other than this.

      Not true. You can still navigate to the cookie store on disk and delete the cookies there. So by your logic, having it in a menu is just a convenience feature, something WANTED but "NOT NEEDED". Even browsing the Internet in a graphical browser can be extrapolated to a mere convenience. If I'm not mistaken, convenience is part of the whole reason we use computers.

    44. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This means that "close to the right" can also be done by moving your mouse to the "x" on the first tab to remove, then tapping the mouse button rapidly until all of them are gone. Unless you have more than the 20-30 tabs that I typically have open, that's really not so terrible.

      It's also good for wearing out your mouse button even faster, annoying your co-workers, and for slower machines having to waste time while chrome tries to reload all of those pages from disk / the net while you are closing them.

      (Hint, one good reason for a "close all but some" button is memory management. Doing it that way allows you to close all of those tabs without having the rendering engine try to render each one all over again.)

      As for why to remove it... features cost. Every feature you keep in a product is a feature that has to be maintained and tested. Development and testing resources are not infinite -- not even at Google -- and the accumulated burden of lots of old and rarely-used features gradually slows progress on new features, security fixes, etc. It makes a great deal of sense to remove features that aren't used much and which have more often-used alternatives.

      The code to do something like this is (assuming any sane coding scheme):

      void closeTabsToRightOf(tabOffset) {
                  tabs = getTabArray();
                  if (tabOffset < tabs.size()) {
                                  for (x = tabOffset; x < tabs.size(); x++)
                                  {
                                                tabs[x].close();
                                  }
                  }
                  return;
      }

      Are you really going to tell me that code is going to change so much that it can't be maintained? Hell, that's probably implemented as a inline callback function for the code that creates the menu it's on. Even if they eliminate the menu, that would be trivial to move elsewhere. Your statement is BS. Even if they massively overcomplicated it, that's still not a good enough reason to completely eliminate the feature. (If anything that means they have MASSIVE amounts of code clean up to do elsewhere so you may as well fix this too.)

      I'm tired of all of this "Developer knows best" crap. Screwing up your end user's workflow on a whim, is not going to give you points. It's going to create animosity. Keep that up, and you will face the same reality that Firefox is currently. I.e. Complete loss of market share when a better alternative comes along. Think that won't happen? Animosity creates motivation to do something about it or go elsewhere. Given enough of a push people will create an alternative if one doesn't exist. Given an even bigger push, and people will do without if an alternative doesn't exist.

    45. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by lucm · · Score: 1

      To close many tabs at once, I just moused-over the leftmost one and center-click rapidly until they are all closed.

      Don't they change size after a while? You must have ninja skills.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    46. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess Google should have added telemetry then.

    47. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might not be faster but it might be more intuitive to users. When asked, most people wouldn't be able to tell the right click tab related menu entries while they are used to be able to undock a tab to a separate window on most apps. I also do the drag then close the previous window. It's not that I am stupid or wants to loose time but it is consistent with the way many other apps do and thus is intuitive. I don't even think of it.

    48. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is there's no other way to do it from the software.
      Good that we got that cleared up.

      Please apply a bit of thought to your posts.

    49. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by bbleeker · · Score: 1

      I've never used either of them.

    50. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will be removed because People did not use it enough.

    51. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuucccccccckkkkkkk! I didn't even know they existed! I'll be using them now until they remove them. :(

    52. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      @bfwebster

      Hi this is you from elsewhere in the multiverse.

      We (I, you) are the only person to ever use this feature.

      Google statistics do not consider however that in the multiverse there are an infinite number of us (I, you, we) using this feature.

      Silly folks think its only one instance!

    53. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone who uses them turns off telemetry, so they have no idea we use them.

    54. Re:Huh? I use these all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most users probably just manually close each tab they don't want open.

  5. Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I mean, who closes tabs anyway. I have over 300 open right now.

    1. Re:Good! by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      I mean, who closes tabs anyway. I have over 300 open right now.

      I actually close tabs fairly often, but that hasn't stopped me from having in excess of 700 open at once, on too many occasions for me to contemplate. I guess I really need to learn to let go. Or not... :)

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    2. Re:Good! by Altrag · · Score: 1

      How? :P.. I have a bit over 200 on any normal day and I had to get The Great Suspender in order to keep memory usage sane -- on my 32gb system.

  6. A fascinatingly slownews day... by mi · · Score: 0

    One of the web-browsers out there is to have a minor change to its GUI... How fascinating...

    A particularly slownewsday? I wish it were...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  7. that does it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Edge, here I come...

  8. NOOOOOOOOOO!!!! by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

    That's actually a feature I tend to use quite often, especially when researching something - when I finally find the page that (best) tells me what I want to know, I can get rid of all the others that led me there. What exactly is the horrible horrible overhead that the maintainers have to put up with to keep these features in the main branch?

    Meanwhile, another thing that drives me crazy is that Chrome will close a window with 19 active tabs without a single complaint. At least Firefox will ASK if you want to close a window with multiple tabs. But in Chrome, a single brainfart/mouso will cost you bigly.

    1. Re:NOOOOOOOOOO!!!! by Guidii · · Score: 2

      If you're not in incognito mode, you should be able to press Ctrl-Shift-T to reopen the last closed tab. If you closed a window, all of the tabs come back.

  9. Re:don't remove menu items by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remove Nazis instead.

  10. And instead by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    put the "reopen the last closed tab" into the command bar.

    Yes, I know there's a keyboard command. But just as certain is that the moment I accidentally close a tab, I won't remember it because I don't need it THAT often.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:And instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ctrl+T is intuitive enough, thence try remembering that shift is often meant to be a "reverse" modifier (eg ctrl+tab moves to next tab, add shift for Previous) so the reverse of a future tab is the past tab

      Not that I care if it's also in the menus wherever.

  11. Now that I know the feature exists... by kiphat · · Score: 1

    I'll surely use it until it's removed.

  12. Features? Look Elsewhere by xession · · Score: 2

    Anyone still using Chrome should have long since resolved to using a mostly featureless browser. If you are looking for features, you probably should be looking more at using Palemoon or another browser maintained by another small group. Once a browser seems to hit critical appeal, features start getting stripped out because your grandparents might fuck something up.

    1. Re:Features? Look Elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's what I call "New Coke Syndrome".

      When a product becomes very popular and widely used, the people who work on the product have a problem. They can't just stop working on it. They can't stop going to work and just say "we're number one, so there's no need to do anything. Send me my paycheck.".

      And so they keep working. Adding new features, removing old features. Making all sorts of "improvements" that in reality actually make the product worse. It happened to Windows. It happened to Firefox. And now it is apparently happening to Chrome.

    2. Re:Features? Look Elsewhere by H3lldr0p · · Score: 1

      There may be some edge cases for the uninformed but almost everything taken out of Chrome has an impact on the bottom line for Alphabet.

      Stripped out options for not automatically running javascript, html5 video, and made it more difficult to monitor locally stored data. I'm waiting for them to get rid of extensions so we can't have our ad & tracker blockers running.

    3. Re:Features? Look Elsewhere by swb · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about this yesterday in a similar way, how once a product's core functionality reaches a certain level you reach a point in its life cycle where as a user you're at risk of significant instability.

      Inevitably the desire to add new features to justify additional licensing fees will lead to the "need" to rewrite or significantly restructure the core functionality and they never get that right the first time, often plunging products back to levels of instability not seen in many versions. And often not fixed for a long time, either, as feature bloat dilutes engineering resources and product managers and marketing fall on their sword to preserve the new version.

      I sometimes wonder if a strategy to deal with this wouldn't be planning on switching to a rising competitor, even if it meant suffering a competitor's marginally lower stability. The idea being that the competitor hasn't hit a functionality & stability plateau yet and will be mostly increasing stability first and functionality second.

    4. Re:Features? Look Elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop calling it Alphabet. It's "GOOGLE". Stop pandering to their obvious tax scam.

    5. Re:Features? Look Elsewhere by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, they can't block me using my Pi-hole though.

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
  13. Tab Rows by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    How about they enable multiple tab rows first?

  14. Wrong reasoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "usage statistics confirmed that Chrome users rarely used the two options"

    The features are useful when you have accumulated a large number of open tabs and need to clean up. This means it may not be needed too often, depending on the user's usage habits. However, it doesn't mean that the feature is not useful when you need it.

    I think the features are rarely used at least partly because many users simply are not aware of it.

    1. Re:Wrong reasoning by jeremyp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The flaw in the logic is that "rarely use" is not the same as "would be fine if it didn't exist". The reasons for removing the feature look bogus to me in that they seem to satisfy an aesthetic quality that the developers want rather than provide any benefit to the users of the browser.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  15. Re:don't remove menu items by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

    "I wish it were as simple as deprecating islam"

    I don't. Along with similar concepts. And Islam isn't a thing.

  16. If it ain't broke... by jenningsthecat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Assuming that those options aren't problems from the code maintenance or security points of view, and if users haven't complained about them, then why remove them? I'm sure some people use them; in Pale Moon I have Tab Mix Plus set up to handle tabs in a way that most users would never even think of, and honestly, I'd be lost without it.

    I know it's heresy to suggest that Chrome might actually be configurable to suit individual needs and tastes; that said, why can't they they just have a preferences setting to show or hide those items? There's a difference between taking the lowest common denominator into account, and catering exclusively to it; and I'm tired of features being stripped away from both software and hardware because the average non-demanding user isn't sufficiently sophisticated to make use of them.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:If it ain't broke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If it ain't broke..."

      Haha. You mean "If it ain't broke..." as in "if it ain't broke, fix it until it is"?

    2. Re:If it ain't broke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, in programming, the expression is "if it ain't broke, make it bigger in another language, then rely on real engineers to make faster CPUs".

    3. Re:If it ain't broke... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Removing features is what made Firefox great. Firefox became a well-known piece of utter shit when it had added feature after feature and bloated to an enormous, complicated hulk of options lost in hundreds of options. Then alternate browsers came along with their slimmed-down feature sets, and people moved.

      Chrome is ditching menu items few people use. It might not die of featuritis.

    4. Re:If it ain't broke... by nightfire-unique · · Score: 2

      So, here's what happens:

      As a product improves, it gathers users. This is a mark of continuing success.

      Features are added, and users rejoyce.

      At some point, the product plateaus. There are no new users coming in, and people start getting nervous.

      A UI designer is introduced to the product.

      "There's a whole market of learning-disabled children and moderately senile elderly folks we've been ignoring this whole time! They get confused by all of this rich functionality. Burn it to the ground!"

      ... and they do. They onboard a bunch of users who were formerly confused by features like "close all tabs," while their core fanbase deserts the product. But that fact doesn't become known for some time.

      Rinse, repeat. Bitter much? Nah.

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    5. Re:If it ain't broke... by swillden · · Score: 1

      Assuming that those options aren't problems from the code maintenance or security points of view

      All options are problems from a code maintenance and testing point of view. Every feature has an ongoing cost. If the cost exceeds the benefit, which is almost certainly the case if the feature is very little-used and there are other more often-used and roughly equally-convenient/effective ways to accomplish the same thing, then the feature should be removed.

      That said, I use close-to-right all the time and hope it doesn't get axed. OTOH, another poster pointed out that it's also possible to multi-select then use Ctrl-W to close the selected tabs, which is almost as convenient when close-to-right is what I want, and also handles other cases where I want to batch close but close-to-right isn't what I want, so I won't be too annoyed if close-to-right is removed.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:If it ain't broke... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Define broke. Complicated interfaces are broken from a usability point of view. Interfaces that aren't the same between systems are broken from a usability point of view.

    7. Re:If it ain't broke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same reason they've """""redesigned""""" the chrome://settings/passwords page, to make it barely usable as a password manager, but shiny and material: because fuck you, that's why. Someone's boredom and need to fill monthly reports is millions' pain.

      Not only out of two input fields now present on the page, the focus is by default on the useless one (settings search instead of password search), the "remove" option does not prompt for confirmation anymore and displaying the password from the manager requires four separate clicks in two different dialogs, instead of previous one click. Everything """""neatly""""" packed so that on a 1920x1080 display it takes up barely 1/3 of full window width.

  17. What the hell is wrong with developers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should never remove features from software. Some users are using those features that you think are useless. You can hide features, or make them more difficult to mistakenly activate, but removal is moronic.

    Close all Tabs and Close Tabs to the Right are features I use all the time in FireFox. I refuse to use spyware like Chrome. Google has proven they are unable to Do No Evil.

  18. Now that I know about them... by InfiniteBlaze · · Score: 1

    I'll probably use them a LOT. I often end up with 40+ tabs open from thinking I'll come back to something. Here's hoping they change their minds.

  19. This is bad... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    How can I keep up with replies to my Slashdot comments if I can't quickly closed out the tabs I've already looked at?

  20. Google is an ostrich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The people who use these features, like me, are the same people who turn off telemetry back to Google, so Google thinks no one uses the features.

  21. Re:don't remove menu items by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And Islam isn't a thing.

    Please say that publicly in Malaysia. Please. Pretty please :-)

  22. BLAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use close tabs to the right ALL THE TIME.

  23. Re:don't remove menu items by bobdehnhardt · · Score: 1

    As with anyone else, that just makes them mad.

  24. Don't remove, fill out remaining options by MiniMike · · Score: 5, Funny

    Those two options are so useful, but I've been waiting for them to fill in the obvious remaining choices:
    - Close tabs to the left
    - Close this tab and tabs to the right/left (this is two options)
    - Close odd numbered tabs
    - Close tabs I don't want my Boss/Mom to see (shortcut keys: Ctrl+Ctrl+Ctrl+Ctrl)
    - Close tabs with numbers in the Fibonacci sequence
    - Close tabs with pages originating in travel ban countries
    - Close tabs except those with numbers on my lucky number list (default values will be provided)

    1. Re:Don't remove, fill out remaining options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      - Close tabs that don't link to the current tab
      - Close tabs that aren't linked from the current tab
      - Close tabs unvisited for more than 35 minutes
      - Close tabs unlikely to be visited in the next 8 minutes
      - Close tabs arrived at through Google
      - Close tabs arrived at through 4chan
      - Close tabs arrived at via Bookmark
      - Close tabs arrived at via in-page hyperlink
      - Close tabs randomly over a period of 90 minutes
      - Invert next close tabs command

      Hey, this is fun!

    2. Re:Don't remove, fill out remaining options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "- Close tabs except those with numbers on my lucky number list (default values will be provided)"
      What are the default values?

    3. Re:Don't remove, fill out remaining options by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Actually, some of those could actually be pretty useful. An option to close tabs unvisited in the past x minutes would be particularly nice to have (where x is a user-configured value).

      I suspect, however, that this kind of functionality can be added via plugin extensions to the browser, and may not need to be in the browser code.

    4. Re:Don't remove, fill out remaining options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the Unclose companions.

  25. Re: don't remove menu items by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's un-American...

  26. good thing I don't use Chrome by mad7777 · · Score: 2

    Google takes their users to be a bunch of moronic infants. Why remove a feature? Ever?? Especially one that has been working fine for years. Oh right... because you don't want to confuse and upset the fragile minds of your users, you can barely manage to use one button on mouse. OK, so that's not for me.

    --
    Might makes right irrelevant.
    1. Re:good thing I don't use Chrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or they actually care about maintaining minimum bloat.

  27. Usage statistics by Exitar · · Score: 2

    Probably made by the same people that decided to shut down google reader.

    1. Re:Usage statistics by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      I was pissed for a long time after that. However, Inoreader is so good that I shelled out for a yearly subscription to try to keep them around. What's your reader now?

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    2. Re:Usage statistics by kav2k · · Score: 1

      The Old Reader. Liked it well enough to become the maintainer of their Chrome extension.

    3. Re:Usage statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >What's your reader now?

      https://www.commafeed.com

      Lean UI, OSS and you can also run it yourself quite easily.

    4. Re:Usage statistics by Exitar · · Score: 1

      I use Feedly.

  28. never understood removing features by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Removing features simply because they're not used by everyone every single day never made sense to me. Even if it is something only a very small percentage of users use, so what? It's not like you have to write that code again every time you compile. It just sits there minding its own business. Leave it alone and mind your own business. It doesn't affect any other work, so why remove it? To save a few bytes of memory? We all have nine zillion memories now. Who cares? Some people use it. And if more people knew about it they'd probably use it, too.

    Most people power on their machine, use the web browser, and office apps. That doesn't mean it would be beneficial to stop making all other programs just because most people don't use them. Same thing.

    1. Re:never understood removing features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody needs "Show controls" anyway.

    2. Re:never understood removing features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Removing features simply because they're not used by everyone every single day

      who are you arguing with? nobody said that

    3. Re:never understood removing features by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 1

      "when usage statistics confirmed that Chrome users rarely used the two options"

      Duh.

    4. Re:never understood removing features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Make a plugin

    5. Re:never understood removing features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Chrome users rarely used the two options"

      used by everyone every single day

      but of course these statements are IDENTICAL!

      in a terribly damaged brain

    6. Re:never understood removing features by nightfire-unique · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Narcissism. There are droves of trendy fashionista UI designers that like "clean" "simple" interfaces, and think to themselves:

      "I don't need this functionality. So let's get rid of it. Fuck everyone else."

      I swear it's that simple.

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    7. Re:never understood removing features by Kjella · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Removing features simply because they're not used by everyone every single day never made sense to me. Even if it is something only a very small percentage of users use, so what?

      Because a lot of people get confused by too much information and too many options. And contrary to nerds they won't simply dismiss what they don't need they tend to avoid it saying it's too difficult. I'm not surprised if Google has analyzed that they'll lose 0.1% tech savvy users and gain 0.2% computer newbies instead. A case study: My online bank.

      They used to have rather information dense pages and complex filters and dialogs with lots of cross links to related functions. I loved it, you had pretty much everything you wanted to see, do or go to at your fingertips. My parents, well they used it because I used it and having free support was more valuable than trying some other bank. They redesigned, far more simple pages. Far more hierarchies and less directly accessible functions. I hated it, at the time I mostly blamed it on designing for cell phones and tablets not big computer monitors.

      But then I saw how my parents liked it much, much better than before. They said it was so much simpler and less confusing to use. Even though they never used but the first two options, it was far simpler to choose from three than eight and the rest hidden under "more options". The transcript page used to have lots of filters, now by default it has account and period, with the period being predefined like "last 30 days" or whole months with custom dates hidden another layer down.

      And it turns out, that's all they really use. if they ever wonder if they did pay the power bill of $100 in the first two weeks of January they wouldn't filter by recipient and amount and date. They'd just scan the monthly statements manually. I'm thinking this and this applies, sure they could learn how to make the computer do more but is is worth it? Considering how little they seem to remember of the basics, I'm thinking neither the investment nor the upkeep is worth it.

      So I can totally understand why, the question is do you have to only cater to my parents. But when push comes to shove, I'll manage to do five clicks instead of two just fine even though I'm slightly annoyed by it. My parents though, for them it makes a real difference. Unless it's really a professional's tool that you work in many hours a day, I'll always survive doing it the slightly harder way like just X'ing out all the tabs or hitting Ctrl-W repeatedly without being a make-or-break deal. It would be nice if we could have a browser by nerds, for nerds though. Maybe it's time for a new Phoenix?

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:never understood removing features by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Removing features simply because they're not used by everyone every single day never made sense to me. Even if it is something only a very small percentage of users use, so what?

      There are costs for keeping features, other than the immediate cost to maintain the software itself. For instance, maybe keeping the feature...
       
      ...forces users to navigate through it or read past it to reach commonly-used features, thus getting in the way
      ...makes the software feel more complicated, decreasing satisfaction for most users
      ...simply distracts most users, wasting the finite amount of attention you get from them
      ...makes the software seem poorly maintained for not dropping support for something perceived as outdated

      Mind you, I'm not espousing any of these (nor am I suggesting the list is exhaustive), but you need to remember that Chrome is not just code. For better or worse, it's a product. As a product, users have certain expectations, and those expectations oftentimes conflict with one another. It's Google's job to sort through the mess of contradictory expectations to make something that satisfies as many users as possible to the greater extent possible (for as cheaply as possible). Apparently they think that dropping these features will do that.

    9. Re:never understood removing features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are slightly risky options which slow novice users down a lot. If you click the wrong entry you might accidentally close a ton of things you weren't trying to close. Since all companies ignores human interaction guidelines nowadays, these users don't know they can undo the closings because there's no longer an Edit -> Undo option. Thus a miss-selection in a menu is a big deal to them. Undo is hidden as a keyboard shortcut, but it may or may not restore the tabs to their original states due to the more dynamic nature of web pages/sites/apps.

      Removing them still lets power users to add them back in through an extension, while keeping novice users safe and reducing their stress levels.

    10. Re:never understood removing features by Altrag · · Score: 2

      There's a HUGE difference between cleaning things up and moving less-used options into submenus and other "hidden" places, vs removing those features entirely.

      Close tabs to the right is already in a menu many people don't even know exist, never mind use. So why are they singling out those two options when there's say, "Bookmark all tabs" on that same menu which by their own stats is used 1/10th as much?

    11. Re:never understood removing features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you could just press the X

    12. Re:never understood removing features by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Because a lot of people get confused by too much information and too many options.

      This is precisely why UI designers exist -- to make a clean UI that makes sense of the zillions of options. That's pretty much the whole reason why menus were invented.

      UX people don't get this. Since making a good UI is hard, their philosophy is to just reduce everything to one, big button.

    13. Re:never understood removing features by strikethree · · Score: 1

      All you are arguing for is that the default view be simple. None of what you are saying necessarily implies that functionality be removed, despite you wording it that way.

      The proper way to handle this situation is to make the default view simple so your dumb parents (your description, not mine) can use the "application" but make sure the functionality that intelligent people need is still accessible, possibly through an "Advanced View" button.

      Are you saying your parents would be forced to click on an "Advanced View" button and use that as the default? Are you saying that the possibility that they might accidentally click on "Advanced View" and never click the "Basic View" button is so high that functionality MUST be removed from everyone?

      Hm. Removing functionality is almost always a bad thing and the excuses you are giving are pathetic at best.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    14. Re:never understood removing features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So have Chrome start in "Simple mode", with a well documented key combination to launch "Real mode", with all options on and visible.

      Problem solved, everyone is happy, nothing needs to be senselessly removed. We're fast approaching a "So simple it's unusable" singularity with this minimalist BS and there's really no defending it.

  29. So where did these usage statistics come from? by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    " when usage statistics confirmed that Chrome users rarely used the two options they initially wanted to remove"

    The bigger issue he is Google is spying on you. Did they bother to ask you to track your usage of Chrome? Seriously, fuck off Google.

    1. Re:So where did these usage statistics come from? by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 1
    2. Re:So where did these usage statistics come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only idiots keep that option on. So they are gathering stats from idiots... Nice

    3. Re:So where did these usage statistics come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't consider that those features might be used extensively by people who bother to turn off usage statistics (and read up on Browser functionality).

    4. Re:So where did these usage statistics come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they did bother. Usage stat collection is opt-in.

    5. Re:So where did these usage statistics come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they did bother. Usage stat collection is opt-in.

      So, everybody with two brain cells to rub together opts out.

      And the fucking UXtards use the skewed-to-the-dumb-half-of-the-bell-curve data they can collect as an excuse to make the UX shittier.

    6. Re:So where did these usage statistics come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says they don't? Maybe they just don't want users who are opposed to data gathering? This is Google after all.

    7. Re:So where did these usage statistics come from? by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      EULA which directs you to their Privacy Policy, which in turn provides for various forms of data collection.

      You're welcome to hate on EULAs all you want, but until the courts have fully come down on one side or the other (and they seem to be leaning more to the valid side,) you should consider this them asking and your using the software to be your agreement.

      I would say if you don't like it just use something else but lets face it, all EULA's are basically the same -- "we own everything and you own nothing, but you still take all of the liability if anything goes wrong. Anything you generate using our software automatically grants us an irrevocable license to use your work at no cost and by the way we can unilaterally change these terms whenever we feel like we're not getting a good enough deal out of it."

    8. Re:So where did these usage statistics come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if you install a browser, made by a company that makes money off spying, what do you expect?

    9. Re:So where did these usage statistics come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Chrome helps Google to gather Data regardless of those settings.

      Keeping the Google Login active is really annoying (not the sync-login).

    10. Re:So where did these usage statistics come from? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      When does that ever pop up? Chrome's installer (at least on Windows) is completely silent.

  30. Close tabs? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Real men let the tabs close themselves. Typically after you get more than 1200 of them open and your computer runs out of all available RAM and the entire OS craps itself and then reboots. THAT's the way manly men close tabs.

    And the really manly manly men then restore the previous chrome session when the computer is back up and running.

    1. Re:Close tabs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And 1199 of those tabs are Yasmin Pires gape porn...

    2. Re:Close tabs? by Altrag · · Score: 1

      I don't know about IE/Edge, but FF and Chrome both save your tabs and restore them after a crash (or at least give you the option to do so.)

      So its not all THAT manly anymore.

  31. + NOOOOOOOOO!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wow! Thats going to blow away my power research pattern.
    Open two pages worth of google results i.e. 20 tabs,
    find the few I need, drag them to the far left and close all tabs to right.
    Owwwch!!!

  32. Firefox conversion progressing as scheduled by achacha · · Score: 1

    I have been slowly transitioning to Firefox, and I use those options often, so this is the kick I needed to just move to Firefox and make that my default browser.

    1. Re:Firefox conversion progressing as scheduled by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Heh. I switched to Chrome because FF was getting shittier and shittier back in the day. Now Chrome is following through. Maybe its time for Opera to return to the spotlight? Or some people have mentioned Palemoon.. never heard of that before but might be worth checking out if Chrome continues down this remove-everything path (how long until they remove tabbed browsing all together and call it a "fresh, new way to browse!"?)

  33. Get rid of the X on the tab while you're at it by junkfish · · Score: 2

    Sheesh, i would prefer if they just got rid of the X on the tab? I inadvertently close tabs I have open because there is an X on each tab. Get rid of it. I will do a Ctl+w if I am done, or just close the entire browser. The X i feel eats up real estate, and is an annoyance.

    1. Re:Get rid of the X on the tab while you're at it by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Ctrl+shift+T is your friend.

      That said, I'm mixed about the X's. Certainly its annoying to hit one accidentally but there's not really any other easy way to close a tab, never mind closing a bunch of tabs (but not enough to warrant rearranging to make Close to the right effective, for example.)

      I mean there's Ctrl+F4 which I use plenty, but we can't expect grandma to be memorizing keyboard commands. And even for my own usage, that requires switching to the tab first and I often find myself closing a bunch of tabs with X that I can identify with just the header text and I don't want to waste the time waiting for the page to redraw (and often even reload) before I can close it.

  34. Re:don't remove menu items by lgw · · Score: 2

    Remove Nazis instead.

    Learn the power of "and".

    I'd like to remove all hateful political ideologies, even those wrapped in religious trappings.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  35. Better idea by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Make it so the thing that asks you if you want to save the password saves the password if you click "yes".

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re: Better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? They just want to know your feelings about saving the password.

  36. This Was My Only Reason for Using Chrome by Maltheus · · Score: 1

    Although I eventually switched back to Firefox, when they finally added this critical feature, the ability to "close all to the right" was the main reason I used Chrome for several years before that. I use it at least 10 times a day. I will never again use a browser without it.

  37. Re:don't remove menu items by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not? Religion is pure idiocy.

  38. Why can't we have a good browser. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are developers always removing features. All we want is a good feature packed browser that the geeks can use and not have too worry about being to hard to use for "normal" users. People write extentions to restore the lost features then the developers cripple the extention API.

  39. only we need is one button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (see title)

  40. Google needs better competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google likes arbitrarily killing things or changing them for unknown reasons. I keep coming back because their search is the most consistent, but will gladly jump ship if I could find something ~80% as good. Already quit using chrome, what a pile of crap. Youtube is also crap (mandatory login, unskippable annoying ads, volume non-uniformity across videos, etc) I wish it had better competitors.

    1. Re:Google needs better competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hear, hear

    2. Re:Google needs better competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see the frustration with randomly killing of useful and popular products, but YouTube login isn't mandatory unless you want to comment or participate with the channels. uBlock Origin makes all ads go away. Video volumes are subjective to the creator. I hear you, though. I, too, wish Vimeo or others were more competitive. But Google does deliver good products. I do pay for some of them, as I have a G Suite account.

  41. Extension by GuB-42 · · Score: 2

    If this feature can be reproduced with a simple extension, no big deal.
    Probably very few people used this feature, so it makes sense to remove it. For those the few who did use it, this is what extensions are for.

    For instance, I like using backspace to go to the previous page. Apparently is pissed some people off so Google removed it. Found an extension to re-enable it, everybody's happy.

  42. Dear engineers... by Grim+Beefer · · Score: 2

    To whom it may concern...

    There's an utterly mind-blowing, revolutionary notion called "customization".

    There are ancient rumors that before the coming of the return of the Great Dark Apple, people that used shit used to have options on how to do so. Ye, let it be known that you can also give users the option to turn on or off certain UI elements instead of just removing them...so it is written in the ancient texts.

  43. No keyboard shortcut, no big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they had keyboard shortcuts, I would use them, but they don't, and I'm not about to lift my hand over to the mouse to right click on a tab.

  44. Re:don't remove menu items by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would that prove once and for all it is a religion of peace?

  45. I could use them on my Firefox by tinkerton · · Score: 1

    That's because the RSS dropdown feeds have an item 'open all' which I click inadvertently and sudddenly I have 10 tabs opening up. So closing everything to the right would be useful then.

    Of course I'd also be happy if that 'open all' option were removed...

  46. UX "expert" logic by jez9999 · · Score: 1

    What's that thing over there on the wall?

    The fire exit?

    Yeah the fire exit. I never see anyone use that ugly thing. Board it up.

    But I've heard of people using it...

    My studies have shown that only 1% of buildings ever use their fire exits! Board it up now and give it a nice white paint job! White is more interesting than color.

  47. Pro Tip by Guidii · · Score: 1

    TL/DR: If you want to close tabs to the right: shift click the rightmost tab, press ctrl-W.

    Ctrl-click on a tab to "select" it, without losing your current selection.
    Shift-click to select select a group of tabs.
    You can drag any set of tabs out of the current browser.

    Enjoy!

  48. Oh as long as your taking requests. by sims+2 · · Score: 1

    Can we move the spell check correction to the context menu option closest to the mouse instead of the one farthest away?

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  49. Re:don't remove menu items by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you'd deport Democrats?

    You mean Republicans, don't you? They are the one that pander to the religious right...

  50. One of the most useful features by cowtamer · · Score: 1

    Honestly, this is one of the features which makes me keep using Chrome. Especially "Close tabs to the right" which allows me to drag the tab where I want and get rid of the stuff I just wanted to take a glance at.

    I really, REALLY hate the trend towards full-screen, single-page browsing with videos enabled by default. It's beginning to feel a lot like "channel surfing"

    1. Re:One of the most useful features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, this is one of the features which makes me keep using Chrome. Especially "Close tabs to the right" which allows me to drag the tab where I want and get rid of the stuff I just wanted to take a glance at.

      Firefox still has the feature for now, so you could always ditch Chrome.

  51. Re:don't remove menu items by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    And leave America without a president?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  52. Very, very useful features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use these two options multiple times per day. I don't see why they feel the need to remove them just because they're not used "frequently" by most users. Does this code need to be touched for every build? Is there a good way for those of us that use this feature to voice our opinions to the Chromium developers?

  53. tab menu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When are we getting ability to add custom menu items to tabs?
    Being able to add items would be hugely useful.

    I've never used any of these since I actively manage tabs with an extension like I'd hope any power users do.
    To my dismay, i see people on here whining, supposed power users crying for an objectively inferior feature being removed.
    Why? You do know Chrome has extensions, right?
    For any purpose these 2 features have, there are vastly superior forms in very simple extensions that make research, work and browsing very easy to manage.
    Whether it is Tree Style Tabs or Tabs Outliner, there are a bunch of useful ones. Many let you suspend instead of close, just in case you find something you don't immediately need but want to check later. (in my case, Tabs Outliner has an x or bin, x suspends, bin closes, AND you can then drag those tabs to ordered lists and add a quick note below / above it)

    Trust me, i don't agree with their reasons, in fact i hate that fuckwit Ben having argued with him plenty of times over the years, but this is just sad.

  54. tabs are pathetic by mspring · · Score: 2

    Tabs are an overly simplistic way to track and manage "views". In browsers and in IDEs I encounter daily a situation where I created too many of them and they loose their meaning to me. I wished there was a better way to organize "views" in a more scalable way, while also preserving the history of their creation. I want to be able to navigate them by keyboard (and mouse).

    1. Re:tabs are pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like tree style tabs? I used to love them in FF.
      There are similar extensions in Chrome but unfortuately they works as a dockable side window and does not get rid of the clusterfuck at the top of the screen.

    2. Re:tabs are pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what TabCandy/Panorama (https://vimeo.com/13560319) was for. Mozilla adopted it, quietly let it rot, abandoned it, and then killed it. A third-party dev (https://github.com/Quicksaver/Tab-Groups) took it upon themself to resurrect it seamlessly, but Mozilla is now killing it again (http://fasezero.com/lastnotice.html) with the move to WebExtensions.

  55. Warm Frog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one seems to care that Chrome is reporting how you do your work back to Google?

    And the frog says "Is it getting warmer in this pot?"

  56. Do they have to though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like seriously, it might not be an option used everyday, but it's damn useful when you open 50 bookmarks by mistake. Does it really bother them that much?

  57. Funny, never noticed them.. by brokenin2 · · Score: 1

    You know, I've been using almost nothing but Chrome for many years (at least 5), and somehow I never really noticed them there..I only read the context menus *for* something that I'm looking for.. I never notice all the other drivel on those context menus...

  58. I've never understood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've never understood this incessant NEED these days to keep reducing user options and control over their own tools and experience. We are devolving into a pool of the lowest (dumbest) common denominator at break neck speed.

    They used to do some hand-waving with excuses about reducing unnecessary cpu load etc etc but every time you see them cutting things that have no negative effect on anything and then adding things which are totally off-mission and DO hit the cpu hard you can see that it's all BS.

    They are treating projects that are meant to cater to many peoples needs as if they (the devs) are the only ones who will ever use them and as such are making permanent changes in the same way users would make personal customization choices for themselves alone. Totally out of context and selfish in the extreme.

  59. uhhhh... by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    It's an option I use daily (on Edge) and would really miss if it were to be removed.

  60. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is already an easy workflow for close other tabs, drag the tag off and close the old window. It's great, if you need two tabs you drank then off and close the rest. Close tabs to right doesn't even have a sensible use case anyway.

  61. That's odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google as a company is all for diversity and minorities, but want to remove a minorily used feature. What gives?

  62. Next up by easyTree · · Score: 1

    Google engineer scratches nose before sipping on coffee.

  63. Selection bias? by wateringcan · · Score: 1

    This is a "power user" feature, and power users tend to switch off analytics. Maybe it looks like the feature is getting used much less than it actually is.

  64. There is a campaign on to remove ALL the features by joemck · · Score: 1

    Seriously. Can't use backspace to go back. Can't customize much of anything. And now this.

    I get that people click it accidentally, but that's no reason to remove it. Do what they did on Android and have the option, but provide an undo for a few seconds after it's clicked.

  65. bad move google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bad move....the way bookmarks are handled is bad enough but i suffer through.. i may need to rtn to firefox

  66. Duh.. by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    Does is cost extra electricity to keep the 2 options on?

  67. I never use them by xQx · · Score: 1

    As someone who's used Chrome every day for the last five years - I had to right click on the tab to see what menu options this article talking about. I've never used them, never needed them and never known they're there.

    If you use tabbed browsing properly (one window per subject, one tab per page) you would never need to close "all windows but this" or "all windows right of this" - and if you do, how hard is it to tear the primary tab out then close the remaining window with your unneeded tabs.

    It seems usage statistics indicate most users share this view.

    Heading should read: "After collecting usage statistics for almost two years, Chrome developers decide to remove two unnecessary menu options."

    1. Re:I never use them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only time I use the right click menu on tabs is to "Reopen Closed Tabs", and it is always greyed out the first time I open the menu after closing a tab (even if I wait 30s) so I always have to do it twice. I'd have thought bugs like this are more important to work on than removing rarely used menu items in a menu that is only 10 items long so isn't in need of urgent cleanup.

    2. Re:I never use them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words: "I don't use it, so OK".

      Your workaround is more effort than closing all tabs from the menu option.

      Software design by subtraction is getting annoying; it adds nothing, and only serves to disrupt existing workflows.

  68. Re:don't remove menu items by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    No? So what exactly is it?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  69. Close tabs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have generally found it more useful, in all browsers, to close the browser and use the history to open the tabs I want open after reopening the browser.

  70. TreeStyleTabs by labnet · · Score: 1

    Yep. Every time I see a post about Chrome and Tabs, I point out that Firefox is my daily driver because of the TreeStyleTabs plug in.
    Chrome used to have vertical tabs, but some engineer took it out because he thought no one used it (because is was in some hard to find config setting... duh)

    I usually have 40-50 tabs open at once, and there is no way I will do that on a browser not supporting vertical tabs.

    --
    46137
    1. Re:TreeStyleTabs by lucm · · Score: 2

      I usually have 40-50 tabs open at once, and there is no way I will do that on a browser not supporting vertical tabs.

      Tab hoarding is a serious condition and it appears it has started to impact your daily life. Maybe it's time to get help.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  71. Check before close by dohzer · · Score: 1

    99% of the time, I like to go back through the tabs to check they aren't important before closing. It only takes a few extra seconds and can save more than that in pain and annoyance.

  72. News for nerds by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it is still "news for nerds", but I am not sure this can still qualify as "stuff that matters"

  73. Google wants to do it by DougDot · · Score: 1

    It's a stupid idea. Why am I not surprised?

  74. why? by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    Why do companies, particularly Google in this case, remove basic options and features in software as if it is costing them money.

    Google particular seems to shut down small-mid size projects that can be incredibly useful and profitable.

    Two examples:

    1. Google Movie Showtimes...this was great, it was a nationwide very accurate movie showtime page that was a feature on Google...it didn't require much maintenance once it was already built. Also, they still have to have staff working on movie results...except they now use a Netflix-like side scroller that requires a user to click to get more info.

    2. Google Wave...it could have been Slack. Slack is exactly Google Wave only with a polished interface. How much is Slack valued at right now again?

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  75. o rly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    delete full browser)

  76. Static number is one of reason, not the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Chrome Engineer,
    Before you are trying to remove these two awesome functions, please stop using them for one day. Then you should change your mind.

  77. Proof google ux folk have too much free time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or their heads are completely up their....

    Or they don't actually use their own browser?...

    There are four or five main features I use in any browser (depending on perspective, and aside from debugger and the scrollbar):

    - New Tab
    - Address/URL input
    - Close All Tabs
    - Close Tabs to the Right
    - Pin Tab

    It should be obvious the usefulness for anyone that opens more than a few tabs.

    I open lots of tabs, and enter URLs or ctrl click links to open things in a new tab from pages I don't want to leave yet.

    For pages I really don't want to lose my spot on (docs?!) I will pin them usually.

    Right now I have 10~ pinned tabs and maybe 20 total open.

    Sometimes I open so many tabs its just too much, and I cannot pin everything. This usually results in multiple windows of tabs.

    Sometimes I get frustrated with so many windows and tabs open that I decide to reduce most of what I want to stay at to one window, and then open another window for opening and closing tabs i don't care about.

    When reducing the number of tabs open I use one or two methods. Either I close all tabs on my window with all of the pinned tabs (which leaves the pinned tabs in place), or I move the important tabs I want to keep but not pin to the left (in the pinned window) and then use the close all tabs to the right option.

    If google removes this feature I will likely still use chrome (some) for development and testing, but may end up having to use FF or Vivaldi for browsing and tab management.

    And no, bookmarks aren't really a solution for me. I have hundreds of bookmarks, so closing the window and opening bookmarks would just slow me down.

    TLDR;

    Google fire your UX people and hire me, they clearly have run out of useful things to do if chopping one of the more useful features of chrome is the best 'new innovation' they can come up with.

    "but its simpler!" the google UX kid said? Sir, your mind is simpler, and that's why you propose dumb changes. /end rant /begin coffee2

  78. If they do that... by Phoenix · · Score: 1

    ...It'll be the last time I use Chrome.

    They recently took away my ability to hit backspace to go back a page. Now I have to use Alt+another key to do what I took just one to do. I had to install an extension to put that feature back.

    Now mind you, I can understand why most people don't use those features. But then again they're not the same sort of users as I am. As others are. There are people who will open dozens of tabs to compare things or to have multiple sources of information available. Then when it's no longer needed...we close the other tabs and call it a job done.

    For example. I'll look at a dozen sites to provide references for things that I say on discussion forums. Once I'm done with my post and I no longer need those tabs and want to go and look at another discussion topic, I'll "close other tabs" and go on my way.

    I'd hate to have to click over and over and over when there is a simple way to do it.

    The only thing that will keep me with Chrome is if someone creates an extension to put back what Chrome takes away.

    --
    -- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
  79. Security Note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he story says the engineers found it was used rarely, citing that as the reason for removal.

    So Google knows EVERY click you do and every page you visit even the buttons and how often you use them.

    Doesn't anybody else find this creepy? See Google is a perverted peeping Tom watching your every move.

    The reason I DON'T use Chrome.

  80. Re:don't remove menu items by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    We have clear laws on Presidential succession due to the Twenty-Fifth Amendment. Alas, that would give us President Orrin Hatch, which I'm not sure is an improvement. (Mike Pence and Paul Ryan would be ineligible.) I find many of Hatch's positions distasteful but I don't think he qualifies for the other N-word.

  81. Re:don't remove menu items by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

    Is idiocy a thing like all other things?

  82. Re:don't remove menu items by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

    You tell me. If Islam is a thing then it is nothing different than all the other things.

  83. Re:don't remove menu items by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

    Not sure where you're going with that. As for as I can tell, people often consider it an insult if you lower something like that to the level of a thing.

  84. Re:don't remove menu items by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

    Like most religions it can be interpreted as such, and like most religions it can also be interpreted and used as a political tool to motivate hate.

  85. Re:don't remove menu items by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    It would rid the world of an idiot.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  86. Google's mistake: ignores pyramid of users by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    "Odds are, people who use advanced features are more likely to turn data harvesting off. Thus making those metrics questionable. Then again, anyone who is opposed to being monitored is not part of the Google's target audience."

    Sounds likely, AC. But here is Google's mistake. There is a sort of hierarchy or pyramid of users for many application. In rough percentages:
    * 1% of users might become superusers making plugins and doing all sorts of fancy things with an application.
    * 10% of users might become knowledgeable about what you can do with an app and provide support and encouragement for their friends (and also rely on the 1% for support and new features like plugins).
    * 89% as all the rest just use the app and ask the 11% for help.

    If you decide to design your platform for the 89%, you alienate all the people up the pyramid who provide free support and evangelism for the product and who guide the product in new directions. As Eric von Hippel at MIT has done studies showing that most (like 80%) of innovations are customer suggestions; so, you also cut yourself off from customer-led innovation.

    I'm really going to miss "close tabs to the right" which I use frequently (and yes I have telemetry turned off too). If there is not a plugin possible for that, removing that feature is definitely going to reduce my liking of Chrome (which I use on a Chromebook). Now, maybe by itself that one change won't make me abandon Chrome (as if there are many great alternatives with Firefox/Mozilla fiascos) -- but, add up enough of these misguided decisions, and the odds will continue to change.

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.