Well knowing how uncomfortable geeks are supposed to be around women why not cast porn stars for all the female roles. It would not be like real life but it could encourage more people to the world of Geekdom. Besides Howard Stern had a ton of porn stars in his movie and it was a huge hit.
Well I have never "bitch slapped" or cut off ears of any person but I find that a good slap to the computer is always refreshing. As for cutting off the ears, I have gutted several computers to various degrees.
But in the end I agree that Quentin is not a good pick. I think that a directorial debut of John Whorfin and shitface (it is only a nickname) would make for one great movie.
Well, I have watched numerous Bond movies (my email address bondowine@yahoo.com is a obvious knock-off). Sure Bond gets all the cool cars but they are not always austin martins. The only thing that is consistant in the Bond movies is that it is implied that he screws at least one gorgeous chick. A lot of people, myself included would take the job if nothing else for that one consistant thing. As for the secret message it is simply says "Bill Gates is God."
I do not mean that Bill Gates likes big boys in any sexual way but I think that he is drawn to bigger people as his protector. I realize that Gates is not a huge guy but his better friends are monsters, Allan and Balmer.
Perhaps, Gates sees Microsoft headed into trouble and feels that the bigger Balmer would be better at defending Microsoft. If I did better at pysch I could go on.
Nothing is said about themes for our gnome, kde, sawmill, enlightenment, etc. ..
Just so you know, sawmill has a ton of aqua themes. Even sawmill's main author has a aqua theme going. I think that aqua themes showed up for sawmill first, anyone out there that can prove me wrong?
I do not know what is worst, your category or the poor sap that nominated Bill Gates solely because he does not have a open source award yet. Appearantly, open source awards are hard to buy at any monatery price.
Well, such a award I feel is needed perhaps not so much for the prize but for the community. These awards mention people and projects that I have never heard of before and therefore bring the spotlight to projects that would not recieve it otherwise. I really do not think it is some much about winning but about getting noticed or whatever.
Besides, some people are doing this for a living and are deserving of creditentials. I really hope that all the awards that Miguel has been recieving lately benefit his company.
Interesting point but just because it is a bottom layer piece of software does not mean it is not good. Do you realize that the famed linux kernel is just a bottom layer piece of software?
It was on topic. I did not know if BeOS used XFree86 or not and it was more or less a inquiry. I have sinced learned that BeOS does not use XFree. Sorry-- it really was meant to be relevant.
Us nerds sometimes only see, the computer. Perhaps it is a curse or perhaps it is a gift. I had to laugh the other day when/. announced that this weeks interview was with a nobel prize winning scientists and the first question ended up being what his favorite OS was.
Can you think of a good open source man with out computer connections though?
Well I use mostly BeOS but when I venture into FreeBSD and use X it is all sawmill. My dealings with Sawmill are that it that it can be configured to act and look a whole lot like Enlightenment but without the bloat.
As for John Harper, the guy is great. He is everything that is good about open source. John is pretty dedicated on having a new release weekly and is constantly fixing those nasty bugs. John is very active in the sawmill mailing-list and always has a quick answer to email.
I realize you really do not mean what you say because you are running some kind of text generator but please be original and make the stuff up yourself. This is supposed to be about XFree86 which you are not even close to talking about. If you went out on some mild tangent then it would be better understood but you are just weak.
By the way, metawronka you really ought to get a webpage. I see you doing much good with one of those free geocity pages.
I heard that IBM has a secret project that is aimed at making very highly skilled robots. Rumor has it that IBM's previous attempts at such a robot resulted in a rather violent machine which is known to favor taking off peoples head in rather unpleasant ways. Those violent robots are supposed to of signed a big movie contract and going to make their debate in the next Bond movie. Perhaps IBM next try will not result in so much bleedshed since it appears that they will be using linux but BeOS would be better.
What ever happened to the old standby- a red rider bb gun? Sure a large mass of you might actually shoot your eye out but who cares about one more visually challegened geek? I sure don't.
I am a professional drug smuggler and would not want my product to get sucked up by mistake. I seem to be able to keep the place pretty clean with my own nose. Is there a drug smuggling toy vacuum coming out?
Well knowing how uncomfortable geeks are supposed to be around women why not cast porn stars for all the female roles. It would not be like real life but it could encourage more people to the world of Geekdom. Besides Howard Stern had a ton of porn stars in his movie and it was a huge hit.
Oh my god- I would hate to see the seen in Pulp Geeks where the one geek is ass fucked by the other.
hemos
cmdrtaco
Well I have never "bitch slapped" or cut off ears of any person but I find that a good slap to the computer is always refreshing. As for cutting off the ears, I have gutted several computers to various degrees.
But in the end I agree that Quentin is not a good pick. I think that a directorial debut of John Whorfin and shitface (it is only a nickname) would make for one great movie.
Well, I have watched numerous Bond movies (my email address bondowine@yahoo.com is a obvious knock-off). Sure Bond gets all the cool cars but they are not always austin martins. The only thing that is consistant in the Bond movies is that it is implied that he screws at least one gorgeous chick. A lot of people, myself included would take the job if nothing else for that one consistant thing. As for the secret message it is simply says "Bill Gates is God."
PLEASE READ WHOLE THING NOT JUST FIRST PARAGRAGH
I do not mean that Bill Gates likes big boys in any sexual way but I think that he is drawn to bigger people as his protector. I realize that Gates is not a huge guy but his better friends are monsters, Allan and Balmer.
Perhaps, Gates sees Microsoft headed into trouble and feels that the bigger Balmer would be better at defending Microsoft. If I did better at pysch I could go on.
It just got back to school and started new classes and found out that I have to watch the matrix for my violent/non-violent lit class.
Nothing is said about themes for our gnome, kde, sawmill, enlightenment, etc. . .
Just so you know, sawmill has a ton of aqua themes. Even sawmill's main author has a aqua theme going. I think that aqua themes showed up for sawmill first, anyone out there that can prove me wrong?
This might be cynical of me but what happened to that installer?
I do not know what is worst, your category or the poor sap that nominated Bill Gates solely because he does not have a open source award yet. Appearantly, open source awards are hard to buy at any monatery price.
Well, such a award I feel is needed perhaps not so much for the prize but for the community. These awards mention people and projects that I have never heard of before and therefore bring the spotlight to projects that would not recieve it otherwise. I really do not think it is some much about winning but about getting noticed or whatever.
Besides, some people are doing this for a living and are deserving of creditentials. I really hope that all the awards that Miguel has been recieving lately benefit his company.
Interesting point but just because it is a bottom layer piece of software does not mean it is not good. Do you realize that the famed linux kernel is just a bottom layer piece of software?
It was on topic. I did not know if BeOS used XFree86 or not and it was more or less a inquiry. I have sinced learned that BeOS does not use XFree. Sorry-- it really was meant to be relevant.
Us nerds sometimes only see, the computer. Perhaps it is a curse or perhaps it is a gift. I had to laugh the other day when /. announced that this weeks interview was with a nobel prize winning scientists and the first question ended up being what his favorite OS was.
Can you think of a good open source man with out computer connections though?
Well I use mostly BeOS but when I venture into FreeBSD and use X it is all sawmill. My dealings with Sawmill are that it that it can be configured to act and look a whole lot like Enlightenment but without the bloat.
As for John Harper, the guy is great. He is everything that is good about open source. John is pretty dedicated on having a new release weekly and is constantly fixing those nasty bugs. John is very active in the sawmill mailing-list and always has a quick answer to email.
VOTE FOR JOHN HARPER
ever wonder how come he does not have one? The answer is because he is not deserving of a open source award!
Is Jolt really that caffienated?
Since VA Linux currently employs both the of the enlightenment gurus (mandrake & raster) what are VA's plans dealing with Enlightenment?
Whoever moderated http://slashdot.org/com ments.pl?sid=00/01/10/0837200&cid=33 is just jealous because their ass is not as yummy as basinger's.
Make some sense.
I realize you really do not mean what you say because you are running some kind of text generator but please be original and make the stuff up yourself. This is supposed to be about XFree86 which you are not even close to talking about. If you went out on some mild tangent then it would be better understood but you are just weak.
By the way, metawronka you really ought to get a webpage. I see you doing much good with one of those free geocity pages.
I heard that IBM has a secret project that is aimed at making very highly skilled robots. Rumor has it that IBM's previous attempts at such a robot resulted in a rather violent machine which is known to favor taking off peoples head in rather unpleasant ways. Those violent robots are supposed to of signed a big movie contract and going to make their debate in the next Bond movie. Perhaps IBM next try will not result in so much bleedshed since it appears that they will be using linux but BeOS would be better.
What ever happened to the old standby- a red rider bb gun? Sure a large mass of you might actually shoot your eye out but who cares about one more visually challegened geek? I sure don't.
I am a professional drug smuggler and would not want my product to get sucked up by mistake. I seem to be able to keep the place pretty clean with my own nose. Is there a drug smuggling toy vacuum coming out?
Altavista is yesterday's technology- it sucks a fat cock.