NFL and NBA both have live streaming services. There are some geographic constraints, but I would be amazed to look back in time and see myself not watching live games on either when I know I did
"Etched in copper, plated with gold, and sealed in aluminum cases...."
Seems like the New Yorker wrote a super long unnecessary article when the Slashdot summary only needed part of a sentence! Par for the course (for both).
I agree it's more official than a private acct on a platform. He's using it as a bully pulpit as POTUS. That said, there were plenty of time, manner and place restrictions available to the government on all sorts of media platforms. I cannot call Trump right now and guarantee myself a time to talk with him. That would be absurd and I doubt anyone would disagree.
With Twitter he can't actually prevent anyone from seeing public tweets -- after all they can easily just open an incognito window or create a new Twitter handle -- but he can dictate who interacts with him. And once again, any number of restrictions apply to how we can interact with the President day in and day out.
I am a bit surprised Twitter has not come up with an option to block people but still let them read your tweets. If the case does go against Trump's administration, then it would not surprise me to see this option play out. This is one of the very few things I've agreed with Trump on and man it makes me feel dirtier (than normal).
As a Mac user, I could not care less about FavIcons in Safari, partly because I don't use them and mostly because other, better options exist for web browsing on OSX (Chrome, Opera, FF, et al). Icons make the tabs easier to identify, but to me the title typically does too.
One thing I will never understand is the people who open 50+ tabs in a single window and then complain about legibility. I don't understand leaving that many tabs open, but if you're going to come back hours later to do so you might as well stash them in a new window and minimize it.
This article could also be called: "Paging Captain Obvious"
Companies seem have learned to not promote internally or give raises when raises are probably overdue, either via merit or that particular job market nice salary rising overall. That's not every company but even companies that paid me well hemmed and hawed when it came to promotions AND salary increase. It's usually just simpler to leave.
What the fuck are you talking about? Do you think the company is that gigantically stupid? They are. I mean they threw a pokemon Go event, but people who get paid for more than you knew the logistics required to pull it off, or at least the basics.
I'm sitting in Chicago as we speak. Our high was 30+ C and was stickier than a middle school football practice.
I lived in Germany in '03. I remember the French surgeon general (?) being recalled from vacation because of old people dying. Y'all just lack A/C. Miles ahead in proper building which cools though
Spain is roughly on the same latitude as the northern half of the US. Spain can get hot no doubt, but to think that the US doesn't or is cooler is pretty naiive or foolish.
As a german speaker, one of them *is* a german word and the rest are cobbled together german words that make no sense as a compound word OR they sound very german.
Just like there are Amazon, Google, Netflix, Apple providing entertainment for a fixed fee. There are training sites that do the same. Lynda is merely one of them.
But that's not what I meant either. I meant having physical access to the actual "box" itself. Getting onto the boat is a chunk of the battle but the ability to physically compromise the box is the most important part. Gonna be kind of hard to do that with 24 x 7 shifts running, no?
That's because you no literally nothing about long term asset procurement, fixed asset operation, military equipment, non-networked computer security, or physical access prevention.
How small do you think these "farms" are? They are selling produce for an entire store, which is probably going to be frequented by thousands of people a week.
If I had a dollar for every time I migrated a client off of home built solutions or poorly implemented OTS application suites, I'd have a lot of money. If a company can implement an OTS by themselves, it's generally because they have great developers, infrastructure engineers, solid architects, buy-in from management, great PMs, and a limited integration/federation scope.
With the push to the cloud, you can alleviate the need for infrastructure guys and some developers. However you still need a ton of competency internally to get the projects up and completed. Companies bring in consultants because they can usually deliver a team who builds that kind of solution year round for many clients. I've worked with most members of my team for 3+ years, from PM to PC to developer. We deliver this day in and day out. Most clients have plenty of people capable of being on our team but they generally have no experience with the platform in question and are missing key cogs from a delivery team. They'll have awesome developers and admins only to have lackluster process owners and non-existent project management or vice versa. A lot of companies have to hire additional people to implement these projects internally. If you have homegrown apps with no admin and you centralize them into a Salesforce, Remedy, et al, you're going to need to develop someone to maintain them full time.
tl,dr; the reason companies are often willing to hire consultants is because they can't provide *everything* necessary to implement the project, merely some or most and it's less expensive in the long term than hiring to fix it
Slashdot Mirror
Thanks captain obvious
NFL and NBA both have live streaming services. There are some geographic constraints, but I would be amazed to look back in time and see myself not watching live games on either when I know I did
"Etched in copper, plated with gold, and sealed in aluminum cases...."
Seems like the New Yorker wrote a super long unnecessary article when the Slashdot summary only needed part of a sentence! Par for the course (for both).
What's the % of female users on Slashdot, seriously?
What you wrote has no fucking bearing or relation to anything I wrote.
So I guess I'd say try harder, but I doubt it would make any difference.
Is this a serious question?
I agree it's more official than a private acct on a platform. He's using it as a bully pulpit as POTUS. That said, there were plenty of time, manner and place restrictions available to the government on all sorts of media platforms. I cannot call Trump right now and guarantee myself a time to talk with him. That would be absurd and I doubt anyone would disagree.
With Twitter he can't actually prevent anyone from seeing public tweets -- after all they can easily just open an incognito window or create a new Twitter handle -- but he can dictate who interacts with him. And once again, any number of restrictions apply to how we can interact with the President day in and day out.
I am a bit surprised Twitter has not come up with an option to block people but still let them read your tweets. If the case does go against Trump's administration, then it would not surprise me to see this option play out. This is one of the very few things I've agreed with Trump on and man it makes me feel dirtier (than normal).
It would seem like it to me.
You would be wrong
As a Mac user, I could not care less about FavIcons in Safari, partly because I don't use them and mostly because other, better options exist for web browsing on OSX (Chrome, Opera, FF, et al). Icons make the tabs easier to identify, but to me the title typically does too.
One thing I will never understand is the people who open 50+ tabs in a single window and then complain about legibility. I don't understand leaving that many tabs open, but if you're going to come back hours later to do so you might as well stash them in a new window and minimize it.
I am guessing you have a very very limited subset of experience with 20-something Americans.
This article could also be called: "Paging Captain Obvious"
Companies seem have learned to not promote internally or give raises when raises are probably overdue, either via merit or that particular job market nice salary rising overall. That's not every company but even companies that paid me well hemmed and hawed when it came to promotions AND salary increase. It's usually just simpler to leave.
It's basically a non-issue.
http://www.rand.org/content/da...
What the fuck are you talking about? Do you think the company is that gigantically stupid? They are. I mean they threw a pokemon Go event, but people who get paid for more than you knew the logistics required to pull it off, or at least the basics.
You, OTOH, just no. Stop
I'm sitting in Chicago as we speak. Our high was 30+ C and was stickier than a middle school football practice.
I lived in Germany in '03. I remember the French surgeon general (?) being recalled from vacation because of old people dying. Y'all just lack A/C. Miles ahead in proper building which cools though
Spain is roughly on the same latitude as the northern half of the US. Spain can get hot no doubt, but to think that the US doesn't or is cooler is pretty naiive or foolish.
As a german speaker, one of them *is* a german word and the rest are cobbled together german words that make no sense as a compound word OR they sound very german.
If you've already turned your work in, then what are you going to copy?
Just like there are Amazon, Google, Netflix, Apple providing entertainment for a fixed fee. There are training sites that do the same. Lynda is merely one of them.
Yep things sure have come around in 28 years!
But that's not what I meant either. I meant having physical access to the actual "box" itself. Getting onto the boat is a chunk of the battle but the ability to physically compromise the box is the most important part. Gonna be kind of hard to do that with 24 x 7 shifts running, no?
That's because you no literally nothing about long term asset procurement, fixed asset operation, military equipment, non-networked computer security, or physical access prevention.
Other than that, I completely agree with you.
How small do you think these "farms" are? They are selling produce for an entire store, which is probably going to be frequented by thousands of people a week.
As an older millenial, they are very uncommon.
Most domestic planes do not have power or usb ports.
If I had a dollar for every time I migrated a client off of home built solutions or poorly implemented OTS application suites, I'd have a lot of money. If a company can implement an OTS by themselves, it's generally because they have great developers, infrastructure engineers, solid architects, buy-in from management, great PMs, and a limited integration/federation scope.
With the push to the cloud, you can alleviate the need for infrastructure guys and some developers. However you still need a ton of competency internally to get the projects up and completed. Companies bring in consultants because they can usually deliver a team who builds that kind of solution year round for many clients. I've worked with most members of my team for 3+ years, from PM to PC to developer. We deliver this day in and day out. Most clients have plenty of people capable of being on our team but they generally have no experience with the platform in question and are missing key cogs from a delivery team. They'll have awesome developers and admins only to have lackluster process owners and non-existent project management or vice versa. A lot of companies have to hire additional people to implement these projects internally. If you have homegrown apps with no admin and you centralize them into a Salesforce, Remedy, et al, you're going to need to develop someone to maintain them full time.
tl,dr; the reason companies are often willing to hire consultants is because they can't provide *everything* necessary to implement the project, merely some or most and it's less expensive in the long term than hiring to fix it