Just in case...I'm not trying to be a dick, btw. This is how science works. Every single thing someone says gets questioned down to the tiniest detail, trying to take into account everything anyone around can think of that might be biasing the results. It means that, to do it right, you have to avoid attaching emotional significance to what you believe. Scientists are also humans though.
Have you considered that willow bark tea may be just as toxic, but no systematic study has been done to test that hypothesis? (i.e. there is a form of funding bias to account for before drawing conclusions about toxicity)
2) Cards - We are NOT targeting Debit cards and nothing below the (Corporate/Amex) level of BoFA/CitiBank/Chase cards. Does this mean we target Classic Cards? No. Other banks? No. We have no intentions of even selling the data we have unlike others who would have profit intentions of using it to make BANK (MILLIONS) in for themselves. We are only doing under $1,000 at a time which helps quite a lot of people in that area. You banks: Need to stop fucking whining and start to up your security.
Yes, this guy has it right. "When does life begin" is a dumb question. If it wasn't, people wouldn't be able to argue about it endlessly. As for whether it's "ok" for a host to kill a half-formed human... probably not. But I'll never be a host, so what do I know.
Huh? Greenhouse gas has something to do with heat capacity? That's a new one. My understanding is that the important thing is the absorption spectrum of the gas.
Most solar radiation is re-emitted from the earth as IR light. The thing to figure out is which gasses contribute to the re-absorption of this form of energy in our atmosphere, and how much for each. Everything else is irrelevant without this factor. E.g., If the energy isn't entering the system in the first place it can't be retained.
After that I suppose you would look at heat capacity effects as well as any effect of cycling through gas and liquid phases, various feedback loops, etc. This is not my field, but your explanation sounds very simplistic and therefore likely fails as a good model of whats going on.
Thats only declared federal funding, state funding is twice that value. There are also tons of indirect costs of the drug war not included in either of those numbers.
Why cant there be a rich country (with lots of bitcoins) where a soda would cost 5 bitcoins, and a poor country (with very few bitcoins) in which a soda would cost 1 bitcoin?
Why couldn't a business make money just because they accepted bitcoin?
Slashdot Mirror
Why is it easier to make money when you already have a shitload of it?
I honestly can't tell if you meant to answer this in your second sentence or not...
Ahh, I've got a friend visiting costa rica as we speak.
So...where are you going?
What do you think is the cause of the "unrestricted growth of the upper class on the backs of the lower classes"?
Or people could take personal responsibility and incorporate the knowledge of this spying into the purchase decision or flash their phones
What makes you say that?
Ok, then. We are in agreement, except that I find the belief that anything "natural" is better for you by defualt to be much more common.
Just in case...I'm not trying to be a dick, btw. This is how science works. Every single thing someone says gets questioned down to the tiniest detail, trying to take into account everything anyone around can think of that might be biasing the results. It means that, to do it right, you have to avoid attaching emotional significance to what you believe. Scientists are also humans though.
Have you considered that willow bark tea may be just as toxic, but no systematic study has been done to test that hypothesis? (i.e. there is a form of funding bias to account for before drawing conclusions about toxicity)
So LAWFUL=RIGHT?
Don't get tricked... Visa is not a bank.
So what makes you say the tea is less toxic than aspirin?
noone reads the actual press release?
2) Cards - We are NOT targeting Debit cards and nothing below the (Corporate/Amex) level of BoFA/CitiBank/Chase cards. Does this mean we target Classic Cards? No. Other banks? No. We have no intentions of even selling the data we have unlike others who would have profit intentions of using it to make BANK (MILLIONS) in for themselves. We are only doing under $1,000 at a time which helps quite a lot of people in that area. You banks: Need to stop fucking whining and start to up your security.
http://pastebin.com/VKz9U1nu
How do you dose the tea?
Yes, if you paid for it...
Yes, this guy has it right. "When does life begin" is a dumb question. If it wasn't, people wouldn't be able to argue about it endlessly. As for whether it's "ok" for a host to kill a half-formed human... probably not. But I'll never be a host, so what do I know.
Its a good find
I don't see how this excuses Mozilla. In that case they should have seen this coming and prepared for it.
Huh? Greenhouse gas has something to do with heat capacity? That's a new one. My understanding is that the important thing is the absorption spectrum of the gas.
Most solar radiation is re-emitted from the earth as IR light. The thing to figure out is which gasses contribute to the re-absorption of this form of energy in our atmosphere, and how much for each. Everything else is irrelevant without this factor. E.g., If the energy isn't entering the system in the first place it can't be retained.
After that I suppose you would look at heat capacity effects as well as any effect of cycling through gas and liquid phases, various feedback loops, etc. This is not my field, but your explanation sounds very simplistic and therefore likely fails as a good model of whats going on.
Thats only declared federal funding, state funding is twice that value. There are also tons of indirect costs of the drug war not included in either of those numbers.
To the second part, Yes.
Monoculture
They could have just released it for free, im sure fans would have mixed it and done all the work.
Huh?
Why cant there be a rich country (with lots of bitcoins) where a soda would cost 5 bitcoins, and a poor country (with very few bitcoins) in which a soda would cost 1 bitcoin?
Why couldn't a business make money just because they accepted bitcoin?
additional huh to everything else you said.
You just repeated exactly what I said in my second paragraph except less succinctly and you sounded all constipated the whole time.