Now one statistician has taken this art to new heights by predicting the content of the soon-to-be published novels in the Song of Ice and Fire series by George R R Martin.
soon-to-be published novels in the Song of Ice and Fire series by George R R Martin.
Societies with very low salt intake have low blood pressure
correlation
Societies with high salt intake have high blood pressure
correlation
Lowering an individual's salt intake lowers blood pressure.
If you are referring to an actual intervention study, I'd love to see it. For 99% of people eating a standard American diet, lowering salt intake will inevitably involve cutting out a bunch of processed, pre-packaged crap from their diet. Most likely if there was a reduction in blood pressure it was because of the sugar or trans fat that was inadvertently cut out along with the salt.
I just did a quick search and couldn't find any numbers. I wonder how many people annually are blinded by lasik, vs how many people are blinded by accidentally stabbing themselves in the eye with their glasses. It could very well be that lasik is less risky than wearing glasses.
They usually get me laptops for work, and I've never had one last more than a year or so, usually with frequent heat related video card crashes for the last few months. Current one is an ASUS G73 series. It's generally pretty good but frequently has video corruption/bad rendering issues in certain CAD programs. I suspect that laptops in general just aren't up to doing much more than websurfing/email/MSWord.
BTW never had an apple computer and I never plan to.
Having an offline backup isn't 20/20 hindsight, it's the absolute basics of the basics.
This is equal to saying that wearing scantily clad clothing means a woman deserves to get raped.
It's more like saying that a guy who dies in a car accident because he was street racing while drunk, high, and not wearing a seatbelt got what he deserved.
Ugh, my 24 ESR is going away in just one more release? I thought I solved this firefox update problem for myself by going to ESR but I guess it was just a (very) short term bandaid...
What exactly is it about this tech that makes it "good enough" for citizen gun owners, but not suitable for police use? I can't think of any possible reasoning that doesn't boil down to essentially "civilians shouldn't have guns anyway".
Does "the diets recommended by the FDA and ADA (diabetes association) are about as close as you can get to a diet specifically designed to cause heart disease and diabetes, and the people responsible know this, but the recommendations aren't changed because the agencies get too much lobbying money from the grain and sugar industries" count as a conspiracy theory?
I'm 100% open to the idea of creationism, no more or less than any other idea. I just need a little more evidence (more than zero) before I accept your assertion that the guy who created it will throw me in a lake of fire for all eternity because I masturbated or touched another man's peepee.
The point is, Amazon should have designed the Kindle from the beginning such that it was impossible for them to delete anything without the user's permission. This isn't a matter of law, it's a matter of my device doing what I want it to do.
Amazon can't delete "content" from my kindle, because it has never seen an internet connection. It has never seen an internet connection because I don't like the idea that amazon can delete my books. As a side effect, I can't buy ebooks from Amazon.
To get me back into their ebook ecosystem, Amazon would have to modify the kindle such that they are technologically incapable of deleting my books, even if compelled to do so by law.
Nothing we're talking about here is affecting EVERYONE. It's affecting the population as a whole, on a STATISTICAL level. That doesn't imply anything whatsoever about any given individual.
That statement is true in the most pedantic, literal way possible. It's also completely and utterly useless to someone trying to lose weight, since nobody knows what their calories burned number is or how it will change in response to a change in diet or exercise (or climate, or stress, or sleep, or illness, or monthly hormonal changes, or literally anything else).
Yes, you're correct that you can look at literally 100% of people who lost weight and say "they ate less than they burned!!", but that doesn't mean that telling a fat person to "eat less than they burn" is in any way helpful, since the only way to determine how much you burn is to keep track of your calories in and how much weight you've lost over a particular time period, then calculate your burn rate after the fact.
It's like someone asking you how they can make money, and you tell them "It's simple math, you just have to buy low and sell high, you fucking retard!"
You can't apply laissez faire, cutthroat free market principles, such as "It's their service, they can do whatever they want" unless you're actually in a free market situation.
For internet access, you can start by eliminating all local monopolies and providing equal right-of-way to anyone who wants to lay new infrastructure, or at least requiring (and rigorously auditing (this part is important)) that infrastructure owners provide equal access and equal customer service to competitors.
It's not a free market situation unless I can choose between Comacast, TWC, AT&T, Verizon, DSL Extreme, and Jimmy-Joe's Old Fashioned Internet Access all at the same address.
Slashdot Mirror
This isn't about Commander Keen and you know it.
Google is simply betting on Duke, as smart people always do.
Now one statistician has taken this art to new heights by predicting the content of the soon-to-be published novels in the Song of Ice and Fire series by George R R Martin.
soon-to-be published novels in the Song of Ice and Fire series by George R R Martin.
soon-to-be published
soon
better re-check that model bro.
What if I need a real computer that I can use while walking around and holding it in one hand?
"Real computer" here means "I can copy the binary off my desktop computer and it will run".
Societies with very low salt intake have low blood pressure
correlation
Societies with high salt intake have high blood pressure
correlation
Lowering an individual's salt intake lowers blood pressure.
If you are referring to an actual intervention study, I'd love to see it. For 99% of people eating a standard American diet, lowering salt intake will inevitably involve cutting out a bunch of processed, pre-packaged crap from their diet. Most likely if there was a reduction in blood pressure it was because of the sugar or trans fat that was inadvertently cut out along with the salt.
I just did a quick search and couldn't find any numbers. I wonder how many people annually are blinded by lasik, vs how many people are blinded by accidentally stabbing themselves in the eye with their glasses. It could very well be that lasik is less risky than wearing glasses.
They usually get me laptops for work, and I've never had one last more than a year or so, usually with frequent heat related video card crashes for the last few months. Current one is an ASUS G73 series. It's generally pretty good but frequently has video corruption/bad rendering issues in certain CAD programs. I suspect that laptops in general just aren't up to doing much more than websurfing/email/MSWord.
BTW never had an apple computer and I never plan to.
Having an offline backup isn't 20/20 hindsight, it's the absolute basics of the basics.
This is equal to saying that wearing scantily clad clothing means a woman deserves to get raped.
It's more like saying that a guy who dies in a car accident because he was street racing while drunk, high, and not wearing a seatbelt got what he deserved.
Ugh, my 24 ESR is going away in just one more release? I thought I solved this firefox update problem for myself by going to ESR but I guess it was just a (very) short term bandaid...
What exactly is it about this tech that makes it "good enough" for citizen gun owners, but not suitable for police use? I can't think of any possible reasoning that doesn't boil down to essentially "civilians shouldn't have guns anyway".
I'd need these two conditions:
1. bulletproof (lol) evidence demonstrating that the gun cannot be disabled by a 3rd party by any method that would not also work on a "dumb" gun
2. statistics indicating that the gun is at least as reliable as the most reliable "dumb" gun that exists.
#1 is a logical impossibility, and, as a software developer myself, #2 is somehow even less likely than "impossible".
Easy piracy due to non-invasive DRM
The DRM on video discs has no relation whatsoever on the difficulty of pirating. Here's how you pirate a movie, DVD or Blu-Ray:
1. search TPB
2. download torrent
No DRM involved at all. If anything the higher quality itself makes Blu-ray movies harder to pirate just because the download needs to be bigger.
Does "the diets recommended by the FDA and ADA (diabetes association) are about as close as you can get to a diet specifically designed to cause heart disease and diabetes, and the people responsible know this, but the recommendations aren't changed because the agencies get too much lobbying money from the grain and sugar industries" count as a conspiracy theory?
Grass-fed beef is superior in every way. I don't eat corn or soy, and I don't want my food eating that crap either.
I'm 100% open to the idea of creationism, no more or less than any other idea. I just need a little more evidence (more than zero) before I accept your assertion that the guy who created it will throw me in a lake of fire for all eternity because I masturbated or touched another man's peepee.
The point is, Amazon should have designed the Kindle from the beginning such that it was impossible for them to delete anything without the user's permission. This isn't a matter of law, it's a matter of my device doing what I want it to do.
It wasn't a secret, but it's still bad.
Amazon can't delete "content" from my kindle, because it has never seen an internet connection. It has never seen an internet connection because I don't like the idea that amazon can delete my books. As a side effect, I can't buy ebooks from Amazon.
To get me back into their ebook ecosystem, Amazon would have to modify the kindle such that they are technologically incapable of deleting my books, even if compelled to do so by law.
It's not his company; he hasn't been involved with McAfee the company since 1994.
Those are all grains, not algae. Algae would be much healthier than all that Whole Foods crap.
... but then my motivation to ever help Wikipedia in any way whatsoever was deleted due to "lack of notability".
Nothing we're talking about here is affecting EVERYONE. It's affecting the population as a whole, on a STATISTICAL level. That doesn't imply anything whatsoever about any given individual.
That statement is true in the most pedantic, literal way possible. It's also completely and utterly useless to someone trying to lose weight, since nobody knows what their calories burned number is or how it will change in response to a change in diet or exercise (or climate, or stress, or sleep, or illness, or monthly hormonal changes, or literally anything else).
Yes, you're correct that you can look at literally 100% of people who lost weight and say "they ate less than they burned!!", but that doesn't mean that telling a fat person to "eat less than they burn" is in any way helpful, since the only way to determine how much you burn is to keep track of your calories in and how much weight you've lost over a particular time period, then calculate your burn rate after the fact.
It's like someone asking you how they can make money, and you tell them "It's simple math, you just have to buy low and sell high, you fucking retard!"
If "sugars, fats and salt" are overused, what exactly do you think should be in processed foods? Just protein?
You can't apply laissez faire, cutthroat free market principles, such as "It's their service, they can do whatever they want" unless you're actually in a free market situation.
For internet access, you can start by eliminating all local monopolies and providing equal right-of-way to anyone who wants to lay new infrastructure, or at least requiring (and rigorously auditing (this part is important)) that infrastructure owners provide equal access and equal customer service to competitors.
It's not a free market situation unless I can choose between Comacast, TWC, AT&T, Verizon, DSL Extreme, and Jimmy-Joe's Old Fashioned Internet Access all at the same address.
And the backlash was huge on reddit and slashdot, but almost completely non-existent among the general console game market.
Fixed This For You
That's why you wait at least a year to buy any new console. Well, it's one reason. You also wait so you don't pay five hundred fucking dollars.