High-resolution goggles that don't look retarded and similarly non-retarded motion-sensor gloves would be the best answer (that I can think of, anyway).
It looks kinda like a fat walkman. The idea that this thing can fit current technology (hdd, cpu, etc) is a pretty good indicator that "wearable" computers and other supercool technology isn't too far behind (in usable form, that is).
And yes, I can imagine a beowulf cluster of these.
Coding with the fishes, see
on
Mob Software
·
· Score: 5, Funny
I don't know what he's talking about. There's no mob mentality on the internet. The web is a place where individuals can share unique and sometimes conflicting ideas in a positive manner. To imply that there is any kind of groupthink...
Is it just me, or is it becoming increasingly difficult to find OSS-developers who don't take credit for everything wonderful about their project? The first thing I noticed is that he kept saying "we" and "us", speaking as a group, a community.
I don't use PostgreSQL, but this dude seems like an okay guy. Glad to see that someone out there is still giving credit where credit is due.
"This is the kind of thing every elected official should have politely waved in his or her face by concerned taxpayers"
Huh? Why? I love Linux as much as the next/. geek, but why should we expect any reasonably large government office to be swayed by this? If this were for servers, sure. The admins should have the experience to make a transition pretty smooth. But offices?
I've worked in government offices, I've seen these people first hand. They aren't the most computer-literate bunch, and they are doing well to navigate Windows. Not to say that they couldn't navigate KDE or Gnome, but why spend the time and money to teach them?
Bottom line (and it always comes back to the bottom line) is that it would cost too much to make the transition.
There is nothing inherently evil or illegal about peer-to-peer networking. "P2P" is a bullshit buzzword, and it's sexiness only proves how little anyone (including those in the industry) cares about staying true to defined tech terms.
eBay? But you need a computer to use eBay. Why would anyone go looking for computer parts if they already had a computer? It just doesn't make any sense.
Just an idea, what about thought crimes? If I were involved in some sort of legal battle over a "thought crime", would the DMCA give me leverage? Would assumption of my thought process fall under reverse-engineering?
Not that it would ever hold up in court. Just curious.
Slashdot Mirror
High-resolution goggles that don't look retarded and similarly non-retarded motion-sensor gloves would be the best answer (that I can think of, anyway).
Optional solution: REALLY fast PDA.
It looks kinda like a fat walkman. The idea that this thing can fit current technology (hdd, cpu, etc) is a pretty good indicator that "wearable" computers and other supercool technology isn't too far behind (in usable form, that is).
And yes, I can imagine a beowulf cluster of these.
I don't know what he's talking about. There's no mob mentality on the internet. The web is a place where individuals can share unique and sometimes conflicting ideas in a positive manner. To imply that there is any kind of groupthink...
I just realized where I was. Tra la la.
Not quite. I've had three of four firsts today (logged in). I hit the karma cap, so I wanted to burn a few points and work my way back up.
And yes, I am that bored.
If that's true, just think of the impact it will have on our daily lives. Cats and dogs living together... total anarchy!
My dog had worms. We put it to sleep.
Hmm...
i have karma to burn
Is it just me, or is it becoming increasingly difficult to find OSS-developers who don't take credit for everything wonderful about their project? The first thing I noticed is that he kept saying "we" and "us", speaking as a group, a community.
I don't use PostgreSQL, but this dude seems like an okay guy. Glad to see that someone out there is still giving credit where credit is due.
Way OT here, but I wanted to let you know that the actual quote is:
:)
"Who is driving?! Oh my god, bear is driving, how can that be?!"
Great choice, though
"This is the kind of thing every elected official should have politely waved in his or her face by concerned taxpayers"
/. geek, but why should we expect any reasonably large government office to be swayed by this? If this were for servers, sure. The admins should have the experience to make a transition pretty smooth. But offices?
Huh? Why? I love Linux as much as the next
I've worked in government offices, I've seen these people first hand. They aren't the most computer-literate bunch, and they are doing well to navigate Windows. Not to say that they couldn't navigate KDE or Gnome, but why spend the time and money to teach them?
Bottom line (and it always comes back to the bottom line) is that it would cost too much to make the transition.
Does this really come as that big of a shock? They are spy satellites. I, for one, would be more alarmed if they were being honest about it.
On the other hand, it really does say something about our country. Not only do we not trust our government, apparantly they don't trust us.
just one of these?
I really wish I had mod points right now. This is one of the funniest things I've ever read on /.
-Nastard-
Posting as myself to incourage moderation of parent.
"The sky is falling"
Typical Slashdot.
"File sharing"
Judging by his words, I would not immediatly discount the possibility of a large number of toes.
There is nothing inherently evil or illegal about peer-to-peer networking. "P2P" is a bullshit buzzword, and it's sexiness only proves how little anyone (including those in the industry) cares about staying true to defined tech terms.
...a beowulf cluster of these? Carmack obviously can.
...and they're the only ones.
eBay? But you need a computer to use eBay. Why would anyone go looking for computer parts if they already had a computer? It just doesn't make any sense.
Watch out for those shady "Pentiom Processor" dealers. And never buy a computer from the back of a monster truck. Ever.
Who cares? Gravity sucks.
That, my friend, is the most frightening thing I have heard all day.
Next stop: MegaCorp.
I think the answer is obvious: we all need to supposrt the Free Speech Protection Act.
Just an idea, what about thought crimes? If I were involved in some sort of legal battle over a "thought crime", would the DMCA give me leverage? Would assumption of my thought process fall under reverse-engineering?
Not that it would ever hold up in court. Just curious.