On that note, my comment should've read 'browsing history' whenever I wrote 'search history'. Sorry for the mistake because it's an important distinction, but I think in both cases the important part is the opt-in.
But then aren't you just buying audiophile equipment but different one?
I mean, I wouldn't go back to my $50 pair of Sony headphones I picked up at radio-shit 5 years ago after using A700s this entire time. Anyone who can't tell the difference is probably deaf, it's completely absurd to claim there is none.
Realize that there is affordable audiophile equipment and some that is a lot more expensive.
The vast majority of people might just do less weirdo shit on their computer than you? What exactly is wrong with Google having access to my entire search history with my consent? Microsoft Windows has a similar feature where you can turn on performance counters in the OS and aggregated data is then used to make features shaped more like the user wants them.
It's not like they're saying "We'll read your entire search history, tough shit", they're offering people to willingly give them that information, and for the bother, they are compensated with a minor bonus.
The cesspool is you and me. They aren't any more dumb or smart than the individuals that compose them at any given time. Nothing is surprising about this unless you haven't been on the internet for a while.
1) Wait for the updates to come to your phone automatically 2) Start flashing Cyanogenmod the day the phone comes out of support, with a single command needed for the bootloader unlock.
Things you do in public aren't private. More news at 11. Face it, the only thing that Facebook changed about that was exposure. You didn't give a shit before because it wasn't cool back then to hate on Facebook. If you don't want people to know about that stuff, either don't do it, or be a social shut in and prevent people from taking pictures. This applies regardless of the existence of Facebook.
Bundling of Flash is a plus because basically everyone ends up installing it, and by having it in the browser, then theoretically it's kept up to date better for non-technical users. I don't know if there's a way to disable it for the very paranoid though, I'd hope so.
I think he means Firefox 4.0, where a lot of drooling retards didn't realize that just because the version number changed faster didn't mean it was somehow impossible to keep up.
It's open source, where the fuck are they going to put the backdoor? If you're really paranoid, compile it yourself after reading the source code over.
The problem is that just -connecting- can cost an arm and a leg. If you dare start transmitting data (which your phone will do as soon as you are connected), you're going to lose the rest of your members.
This is why people don't really care about the 80K feature. Either you want to connect, or you don't.
Is the Blackberry OS so shit that there is no "Turn off data when roaming" option? Because on real phones what you said just never has a chance to happen.
Of course it's not stupid. It's the whole reason for the feature in the first place. So that 'acceptable' ads can be shown and used to support the websites you visit. They need the money, you know. The reason it's on by default is that the ads are specially screened for their acceptability, and only ads that are deemed not annoying to users are presented.
Compare this to Right-Click -> Mount. Which is also available on some distros of Linux depending on DE and such.
No, two lines of fucking arcane bullshit isn't ease of use. It's nerdy crap.
You're right, I meant the English word Audiophile and not the made up term. I guess he did quote it..
On that note, my comment should've read 'browsing history' whenever I wrote 'search history'. Sorry for the mistake because it's an important distinction, but I think in both cases the important part is the opt-in.
But then aren't you just buying audiophile equipment but different one?
I mean, I wouldn't go back to my $50 pair of Sony headphones I picked up at radio-shit 5 years ago after using A700s this entire time. Anyone who can't tell the difference is probably deaf, it's completely absurd to claim there is none.
Realize that there is affordable audiophile equipment and some that is a lot more expensive.
The vast majority of people might just do less weirdo shit on their computer than you? What exactly is wrong with Google having access to my entire search history with my consent? Microsoft Windows has a similar feature where you can turn on performance counters in the OS and aggregated data is then used to make features shaped more like the user wants them.
It's not like they're saying "We'll read your entire search history, tough shit", they're offering people to willingly give them that information, and for the bother, they are compensated with a minor bonus.
The cesspool is you and me. They aren't any more dumb or smart than the individuals that compose them at any given time. Nothing is surprising about this unless you haven't been on the internet for a while.
Apparently yes, given your reply.
Or if you have a reference phone:
1) Wait for the updates to come to your phone automatically
2) Start flashing Cyanogenmod the day the phone comes out of support, with a single command needed for the bootloader unlock.
Things you do in public aren't private. More news at 11. Face it, the only thing that Facebook changed about that was exposure. You didn't give a shit before because it wasn't cool back then to hate on Facebook. If you don't want people to know about that stuff, either don't do it, or be a social shut in and prevent people from taking pictures. This applies regardless of the existence of Facebook.
Because people are misinformed. Especially paranoids, apparently.
Neither. Who cares? Just get the open source code and compile it. I guess you were too much of a retard to figure that one out huh?
That's just Notepad is a fucking badass and isn't afraid of anything. Open up them locked files, busting a cap in them handles.
Bundling of Flash is a plus because basically everyone ends up installing it, and by having it in the browser, then theoretically it's kept up to date better for non-technical users. I don't know if there's a way to disable it for the very paranoid though, I'd hope so.
Chrome isn't proprietary you fuckerlord, if you don't want Flash bundled, then get the source and unbundle it.
I think he means Firefox 4.0, where a lot of drooling retards didn't realize that just because the version number changed faster didn't mean it was somehow impossible to keep up.
It's open source, where the fuck are they going to put the backdoor? If you're really paranoid, compile it yourself after reading the source code over.
You accidentally added 'never' to that sentence.
Do you also not have a Facebook account and do you refuse to use texts? AKA who gives a shit?
I just read the article and it says nothing about 2.475 miles. Where did you read it?
The accident was listening to Deadmau5.
By committing worse atrocities?
The problem is that just -connecting- can cost an arm and a leg. If you dare start transmitting data (which your phone will do as soon as you are connected), you're going to lose the rest of your members.
This is why people don't really care about the 80K feature. Either you want to connect, or you don't.
Is the Blackberry OS so shit that there is no "Turn off data when roaming" option? Because on real phones what you said just never has a chance to happen.
Of course it's not stupid. It's the whole reason for the feature in the first place. So that 'acceptable' ads can be shown and used to support the websites you visit. They need the money, you know. The reason it's on by default is that the ads are specially screened for their acceptability, and only ads that are deemed not annoying to users are presented.
Maybe you should learn to report bugs. Because hundreds of thousands of people are running the browser with no issues.