Slashdot Mirror


Research In Motion To Be Sold, Possibly To Samsung

New submitter ve6ay writes "The talk of the tech world over the past day is that RIM, struggling mightily in these last months, was in talks to be bought either partially or wholly by Samsung. Sources at the Boy Genius Report indicate that while RIM may be trying to sell, it is asking way too much for itself."

218 comments

  1. Old news is old by MrHanky · · Score: 5, Informative

    Old news is even denied by Samsung.

    1. Re:Old news is old by A+Big+Gnu+Thrush · · Score: 3, Funny

      SOPA blackout would have saved Soulskill some embarrassment.

    2. Re:Old news is old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Samsung is even denying merging Tzen with Bada. All of that to make a great confusion.

    3. Re:Old news is old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear me... is it that easy nowadays to influence stock prices? I hate to sound like a conspiracy theorist - but seriously:

      1. Buy RIM shares
      2. Post some anonymous rumour on tech blog, watch share price jump.
      3. Sell RIM shares.
      4. PROFIT!

    4. Re:Old news is old by MrHanky · · Score: 2

      He would probably post it tomorrow anyway.

    5. Re:Old news is old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dear me... is it that easy nowadays to influence stock prices? I hate to sound like a conspiracy theorist - but seriously:

      1. Buy RIM shares
      2. Post some anonymous rumour on tech blog, watch share price jump.
      3. Sell RIM shares.
      4. PROFIT!

      Technically speaking, a Conspiracy is three or more people who are in collusion with each other to commit an illegal act.
      So if you're doing it all by yourself, it's not Conspiracy by definition, regardless of the legality.

      But yeah, it works pretty well. At least, it works well if you're a day-trader.

    6. Re:Old news is old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      He would probably post it tomorrow anyway.

      According to Slashdot's dupe policy, he is obligated to.

    7. Re:Old news is old by deniable · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, it's a pump-n-dump RIM job.

      Um, rim shot.

    8. Re:Old news is old by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Maybe Samsung was confusing Bada with RIM?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    9. Re:Old news is old by NatasRevol · · Score: 2, Funny

      I prefer this:

      1. Wait until RIM shares get boost.
      2. Buy RIM puts.
      3. Wait until RIM rumors disproved.
      4. Sell RIM puts, i.e. profit!

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    10. Re:Old news is old by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      hrhrhrhr

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    11. Re:Old news is old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Hanky forgets the golden rule of corporate PR. Deny everything until it happens.

    12. Re:Old news is old by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Down 2.2% today at time of writing this, so it failed.

    13. Re:Old news is old by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      A conspiracy can consist of only two people.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    14. Re:Old news is old by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      Seriously, do the /. editors read more than just the submitted posts feed? http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/17/samsung-not-buying-rim/

    15. Re:Old news is old by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 2

      BGR has a history of posting false rumors about RIM. I'm not sure why anyone is surprised that this turned out the same. The only surprising thing was that anyone believed them in the first place (and many major media names did).

    16. Re:Old news is old by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      You can do 2 with the profits from AC's number four and get them on the way up and down.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    17. Re:Old news is old by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. If someone wanted to dump a whole lot of stock in very short order, it likely succeeded quite well. (And judging by the volume of RIMM share transactions since the rumor came out, that seems not-too-unlikely...)

      It doesn't have to jump for long to be profitable to someone.

    18. Re:Old news is old by Xeranar · · Score: 1

      It's called pump & dumping and it is a crime but you need to prove it.

    19. Re:Old news is old by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      I don't know why they'd want it either, seeing as they're heavily invested in Android, also have Bada, and have god knows how many no-name smart phone OSs on their low end devices. What would they want to buy a company for when their only appreciable asset is their (struggling) smart phone OS?

      If someone does by RIM (and I can see it happening), my money is on one of the gadget-makers without a successful smart phone brand already. I could see one of the PC manufacturers going for it, such as Dell, Lenovo, Asus, etc.

    20. Re:Old news is old by domatic · · Score: 1

      I think the wheels just fell off the bus.

    21. Re:Old news is old by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      What would they want to buy a company for when their only appreciable asset is their (struggling) smart phone OS?

      Patents. That's just about all there is to tech these days.

    22. Re:Old news is old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends on where you option purchases and execution points were. =)

    23. Re:Old news is old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing can do that, not even SOPA.

  2. you're a day late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Was a rumor and nothing more. This has been debunked by samsung.

  3. Too late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Too late. by Phil06 · · Score: 5, Funny

      RIM should try HP, they're suckers for stuff like this

      --
      "...and yet, I blame society" Duke - Repo Man
    2. Re:Too late. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      The LA Angels have also shown a penchant towards overpaying the past couple of years. If RIM could figure out some marginal baseball tie-in, they might be able to sucker Moreno into meeting their asking price.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  4. W7VOA tweeted about this hours ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://twitter.com/#!/W7VOA/status/159449502166691841

    Steve Herman @W7VOA

    Samsung Electronics denying RIM takeover speculation. #Blackbery #Korea

  5. Getting old by firex726 · · Score: 1

    And to think, it was not too long ago that a Blackberry was "the phone to own".

    1. Re:Getting old by Massacrifice · · Score: 1, Funny

      And to think, it was not too long ago that a Blackberry was "the phone to own".

      Now it's the phone to get 0wned!

      --
      -- Home is where you eat your heart out.
    2. Re:Getting old by GNious · · Score: 1

      According to our management, it still is!
      (Unless you are said management, then the only right phone is the iPhone)

    3. Re:Getting old by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      It is still very much the phone of choice for teenage rioters in England. That's probably not good for its image in the premium market.

  6. Is it still possible? by neokushan · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't think this rumour of samsung buying out RIM is true, but it's worth noting that RIM's share price took a dive when Samsung denied it, theoretically that could have been a clever move by the big S to make the purchase cheaper.

    Frankly, though, I don't think RIM has anything of value to offer Samsung.

    --
    +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    1. Re:Is it still possible? by Locke2005 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Frankly, though, I don't think RIM has anything of value to offer Samsung.

      Well, except for the prospect of offering "RIM jobs" to attract new engineers, no, it doesn't.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Is it still possible? by delinear · · Score: 1

      It does seem a little odd. Also, the suggestion of Samsung distancing itself from the Android eco-system (in the BGR article) is the opposite of what I want from a phone manufacturer. I have the Galaxy Nexus, and the pairing of Samsung's phone design and Android ICS is very slick. If anything, I'd say there's a big shiny niche in the market for the first manufacturer to decide to offer vanilla ICS on all their handsets instead of adding their own UI over the top.

    3. Re:Is it still possible? by neokushan · · Score: 2

      Plus, Samsung has their own mobile OS (BADA), as well as what's left of Nokia's Meego (Tizen). They certainly don't need BlackberryOS on top of that.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    4. Re:Is it still possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, though, I don't think RIM has anything of value to offer Samsung.

      Maybe not, but at the right price, it's one less competitor in the market place.

      Samsung has had it's sights set on total domination of the smartphone market for quite some time now.

    5. Re:Is it still possible? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Unless they want the patents that come with it

    6. Re:Is it still possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to SEC rules, if they speak publicly about the acquisition (like denying it) but then actually do buy RIM, they have violated regulations and may be sanctioned. By denying the rumor, they have created a legally enforceable disincentive for going after RIM.

  7. Why isn't /. dark today? by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Seems like it should go without saying..

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    1. Re:Why isn't /. dark today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because that would be pointless. Your average /.er already knows (hopefully!) about SOPA.

      As it is the Wikipedia blackout is circumvented easily enough with a quick tap of the esc key.

    2. Re:Why isn't /. dark today? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia's blackout is circumvented by NoScript.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    3. Re:Why isn't /. dark today? by luther349 · · Score: 1

      black out youtube that will make some noise.

    4. Re:Why isn't /. dark today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One doesn't need NoScript.

      Firefox>view>page style>no style

    5. Re:Why isn't /. dark today? by deniable · · Score: 1

      Everybody here already knows. The masses don't come here. Shut down something they care about like Wikipedia or Facebook. Hell, shut down Farmville for an hour and it will be bigger than shutting down Slashdot for a week.

    6. Re:Why isn't /. dark today? by fermion · · Score: 1
      Mass market web sites going dark or doing other things to raise awareness is useful because many if not most are not aware of the far reaching implications, one of which is the probable increase in costs for many websites to the point they may have shut down. By shutting down today, these sites are expressing these consequences in a concrete fashion that may result in some backlash to the small number of person who support draconian measures to protect even fewer interests, to the point where support is no longer viable. In fact the bill is effectively dead, but will come back if the climate changes after november and the persons who fight for the elite at the expense of the pesants have control of government.

      /. is not a website where many are not aware fo the issue. Those that wish to have already taken action. /. dark will serve no purpose. /. as a place to serve information and coordinate, as it is doing, does. For example, if Wikipedia served pages of links, as /. is, no mass market consumer is going to read it. by going dark, it sends a tangible message.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    7. Re:Why isn't /. dark today? by yanyan · · Score: 1

      Or by simply disabling javascript in the browser.

    8. Re:Why isn't /. dark today? by firex726 · · Score: 1

      It may be easy for us, but what about your parents? or grandparents?
      They're going to be voting on these same congress people, and will also be affected by these laws.

      Which do you think they visit more Wiki/Google or slashdot?

    9. Re:Why isn't /. dark today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kind of funny they still have a daily article for today lol...

  8. An even better plan: by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 4, Insightful

    An article for each senator who supports SOPA, with the corresponding senate.gov link

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    1. Re:An even better plan: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      great idea!

      get started, lemme know when you've got it done, so I can click a link or two to express my dismay.

    2. Re:An even better plan: by evilbessie · · Score: 1

      By SOPA you obviously mean H.R 3261, or something that NO senators support, it being a House bill. The corresponding senate bill is PROTECT IP Act (PIPA), S.968.

  9. Re:CENSORED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I came here to say this. Sad to see what Slashdot has become.

  10. Re:CENSORED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best thing to do is to move all servers outside the US. That's the only way to fix the problem. These blackouts aren't going to accomplish anything.

  11. Re:CENSORED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [This message was removed pursuant to the Stop Online Piracy Act due to an accusation of copyright infringement by Research in Motion]

  12. jim & mike are in their own reality by almitchell · · Score: 1

    But maybe Nokia and RIM could both salvage something if they merged. Not that Jim & Mike can grasp the reality in front of them.

    --
    Baseless self confidence kills more people each year than bathtubs.
  13. Somebody end its misery already! by rahulreddy1986007 · · Score: 1

    This company has seen more than its fair share of dismal performances. Can RIM RIP atleast now?

  14. Re:CENSORED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You'd need to move the primary DNS servers outside the US, too, because that's where they're going to start blocking.

  15. The sooner RIM dies.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. the sooner I can stop wasting time dealing with their crappy back end, documentation and "Blackberry Enterprise Server compatible" data plans that are nothing more than a rip-off mechanism for telcos.

    1. Re:The sooner RIM dies.. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      While their proprietary data method generally sucks, it's not always a ripoff... In particular, their data roaming charges tend to be lower than standard data plans.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  16. The US President's Blackberry by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I were the US president, I wouldn't want my Blackberry to be at the mercy of a South Korean corporation. It's risky enough for a Canadian corp to be running such a sensitive device, but if it's going to be foreign (and so not entirely subject to US laws, and obviously having a national interest that sometimes competes with America's), Canadian is about the least risky. Especially after decades of integration with sensitive US operations, including the space arm on the NASA shuttles. But South Korea is not nearly as reliable, given its understandably different national interests and lower integration with US law. Not to mention the higher stakes in S. Korea with its insane nuke-armed neighbor changing kings and looking for new terms in their permanent war backed by the US.

    In any case President Me would rather have an Android phone, with an OS my spooks could inspect with a fine toothed comb, than a closed OS - whether foreign made or not. I wouldn't want Steve Jobs' ghost having secret access to my top-secret iPhone messages, especially when there are so many laws and lawsuits Apple could use my help "fixing". Even just tracking my location through a commercial datacenter seems a breach of national security.

    The US has such a large military, and budget to match, that I'd expect the White House to come with our own government smartphones on a secure network. There's no reason my phone couldn't use a gateway device carried by my entourage that goes over a secure military satellite network, even if the gateway is too big for me to carry myself. I don't carry the nuke football, either. But I could carry a civilian smartphone, battery out, in case I was separated from my entourage and as a last resort had to make a call on a public network.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:The US President's Blackberry by AzN_DJ · · Score: 1

      I think that relying on everything being American is a stupid level of patriotism. There are other people in the world you know?? Who gives a damn where something is manufactured? Having a phone in the US is probably more susceptible to Carrier IQ than most other places in the world.

    2. Re:The US President's Blackberry by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about the network, not just where the phone is manufactured. I gave the reasons why it matters in terms of different national laws, not patriotism. You're not even reading what I wrote.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:The US President's Blackberry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #1. President doesn't use this phone for secret communication
      #2. See #1

      So what's the problem?

    4. Re:The US President's Blackberry by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it's especially fucking stupid when the company will sell your info anyways if you're in foreign territory. then using bb is fuuucking stupid if you want privacy.

      "ooh they're foreign they'll add some magic spy chip that uses no electricity yet transmits constantly at 9gbps omg magic haxors" doesn't make much sense either. ..and in the case you were teh prezidente.. well, how about just not messaging shady shit, if you're planning surprise war you're already over your authority in most countries even if you're the president. you want to exchange shady info and plans, do it face to face. it's not like you could trust your spooks anyways.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:The US President's Blackberry by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      If I were the president I wouldn't want to carry two phones. Or have any of my conversations tappable by someone not in my spook department.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  17. I claim copyright! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've already thought up news stories about other companies being bought and sold. You're infringing on my rights!

    I'll have this place shut down.

  18. Re:CENSORED by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Right, 'cause the Chinese people don't have any problem accessing servers blocked by the government, do they?
    Sorry, the "best thing to do" is pass laws guaranteeing freedom on the net, instead of blocking freedom. While simultaneously working on a network of anonymous encrypting proxies, I guess. Content owners do have right to implement technical measures to protect their property rights, but in the absence of government intervention, I believe the freetards can implement technical measures guaranteeing freedom of speech at a much faster rate.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  19. Stock Prices? That's your kicker? by RobinEggs · · Score: 1

    The whole slew of articles depends on inference, rumors, and anonymous sources. Par for the course.

    The most ignorant moment, however, comes in the itworld article, when they claim that stock movements are giving credence to the rumors: RIM went up by 6.7%.

    That's what happens for rumors, even crazy ones: stock prices go up. Credible rumors, however, would produce more action than that. Actual plans in the works, actual offers on the table, would create much, much more: the same article talks about Yahoo! rejecting $31 dollars a share at a time when they were valued at ~$19. RIM couldn't expect anywhere near the same premium, but nevertheless buyouts frequently come with some gravy, and a credible rumor could easily prompt the pure speculators, and even many sane investors, to push the stock up 20% or more. RIM went up a lousy 6.7%.

    In other words, this isn't a credible rumor and even most speculators aren't seriously believing this talk yet. Call us when the stock goes up 15% or more, not to mention when you get a source with an actual name or some details.

  20. I don't understand what went wrong by billcarson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't see at what point Blackberry failed? They started out as a messenger aimed at the corporate world, with reliability, uptime and ease of use as their selling points. They still offer that. The business world still has a need for this type of communication. What went wrong? I think it is a pity to see a motivated company like this go down.

    1. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by psergiu · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They failed at: reliability, uptime and ease of use
      Real life example:
      - Today i just missed a rescheduled meeting because my BlackBerry failed to ring the alarm (usually happens after too many days with no reboot);
      - Had about 4 half-day to full-day outages in the last month;
      - BES server upgrade caused ~15% of the Blackberry users in my department to lose access for around 3 days and then they had to reformat their devices to be able to receive mail again.

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    2. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      (Posting AC because I'm at work)

      I don't see at what point Blackberry failed?

      What? Really? I can tell you the exact moment their downfall began. It's when the iPhone was announced and they decided they didn't have to adapt. Every other major phone maker quickly shifted gears, to one degree or another, except RIM. And RIM has been failing ever since. It's only recently that the downward fall has accelerated to this staggering degree but it all began the instant the iPhone was announced.

    3. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see at what point Blackberry failed?
      They started out as a messenger aimed at the corporate world, with reliability, uptime and ease of use as their selling points.
      They still offer that. The business world still has a need for this type of communication. What went wrong?
      I think it is a pity to see a motivated company like this go down.

      RIM became damaged goods. They lost their reputation as a secure corporate messenger when they decided to give corporate secrets away to any oppressive government that asked. Throw a couple of service blackouts into the mix and now no one trusts them.

    4. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Bert64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They were revolutionary in their day, but now everyone offers email on their phones...

      They failed to move with the times, so now while they still offer the same features everyone else offers something more and RIM devices are now perceived as dated and boring.

      Their products are tied to Microsoft (BES requires windows and is primarily tied to exchange), who released a competitor in the form of activesync and bundle it for free with exchange, rim cannot possibly be cheaper because if you have everything you need to run a blackberry server you also have activesync, and likely also have an MS sales rep in your ear.

      They try to lock you in to their products (you need a blackberry server, a blackberry handset and a blackberry specific data plan), but aren't big enough to get away with this strategy... Even MS Activesync is more open, there are multiple implementations on both the client and server end, and they work with standard carrier data plans.

      They route traffic through their servers, creating an additional single point of failure. With a standard data plan the traffic is routed by the telco to your server via the Internet... With RIM the data is routed by the telco to rim via the internet, who they route it back to you via the internet... If RIM has an outage (and they have had several recently) then you are dead in the water... If your internet connection or telco suffers an outage you have the ability to change provider with minimal fuss, if RIM has an outage you have to migrate away from blackberry to another manufacturer which means changing your server infrastructure and replacing handsets.

      The non enterprise (ie consumer oriented) blackberry service is intentionally crippled.

      It is becoming more common for employees to provide their own phones rather than using company supplied ones, not many people want to buy a blackberry for their own use (partly due to the crippled consumer level service).

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    5. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Well one problem was, to qout a common cliche, "It's the interface stupid!"
      e.g.
      The fonts on the BB are crap.
      i.e.
      The whole UI design suffers the same problem as the UI on the PS3 - it looks like it was designed by an engineer instead of the sexy UI of the iPhone or XBox360 :-/

      Sexy devices sell. RIM completely under estimated the importance of having a clean, easy, consistent UI - the iPhone showed everybody you don't need to be stuck with shitty UIs on a phone - and sexy sells.

    6. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by billcarson · · Score: 1

      They indeed provide a very closed and locked product, but that should not be a problem for the business world? I think most companies just want a product which has proven itself, is compatible with their legacy systems and will be supported for a long time. The fact that the whole 'supply chain' (if I can call it that way) is controlled by RIM is not really a minus at that point; it was moreover the reason why BB's had faster email and web response times than the competition. Most of the people on /. criticize RIM for not having the same open policy towards developers for their system, and not 'being like the iphone'. I personally don't see how those two factors would influence their sales in the corporate world. Games and silly applications are not what managers are waiting for, and useful applications will find their way on the device (eventually, when they passed the 'hype' stage).

    7. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, now I am happy with my Symbian phone. The music player crashes all the time, but at least the calendar and the alarm clock always did their job.

    8. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Zerbey · · Score: 3

      They failed because they refused to innovate, expecting that they would continue on customer loyalty alone. It hasn't happened.

    9. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by flanders123 · · Score: 1

      I think a huge reason (outside of obvious issues like UI and outages), is Android's / IOS's ability to connect DIRECTLY to your company's Exchange Servers essentially FOR FREE. I say essentially free, as there is some Exchange setup required, but the cost is one-time and small. Not only is this setup less costly, it is also more architecturally sound as it eliminates the Blackberry service's "middleman" between your device and your company's mail server.

      This completely undermines BB's business model.

    10. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      How the f** can they screw up an alarm clock? It happened to me too. It just blew my mind.

      I swapped my Blackberry 9700 for a Nokia C3. The Nokia does half as much, but I was sick of wasting my time with my unreliable POS Blackberry. The C3 was supposed to be temporary, it's not perfect, but I'm getting good at working around its quirks.

    11. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet RIM are still growing in sales total, just not in percentage of the smartphone market.
      There are more BlackBerry users today than there were 12 months ago.

    12. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Lucky_Norseman · · Score: 1

      Connecting directly to exchange is much simpler.....
      If you only want email. With BB you can also have the phone on your intraweb and access all the internal systems without exposing them on the internet.

    13. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by ckaminski · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The EPIC FAIL that was the Storm. That's the moment of failure. That they COULD turn the ship mid-course. But they turned it TOWARDS the whirlpool, not towards the beach with bikini-clad volleyball players.

      Sad.

    14. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by phorm · · Score: 1

      Android did that too. When the phone would go to "deep" sleep, the time wasn't flipping over for the alarm app. I slept in late once, turned on my phone, and watched the clock flip from 9:00pm to 7:30am then ring the alarm.

      It was fixed in later versions of Android.

    15. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by nine-times · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yup. I do IT support, and we support blackberries, iPhones, Android phones, etc. From my point of view, here's the breakdown:

      Blackberry: People tell us they buy them because they're super-reliable business phones with lots of security features, but no one uses those security features and we get constant complaints about devices crashing, email not sending, and email not downloading. It's a headache to troubleshoot because of the weirdness of the setup-- resending service books, deactivating/reactivating phones is a hassle. Then every once in a while, every Blackberry in the world stops working because RIM essentially engineered a single point of failure for no apparent reason.

      Android: Generally hard to support because there are so many models and they might be very different. How do you set up [x] on phone [y]? I don't know. I have to look it up because who knows which version of Android is installed or what UI customizations the manufacturer put on top of them? Most likely, I won't find good online instructions, so I'll need to get the phone in my hands and fiddle with it myself before I can say how to do anything with it. Other than that, they're kind of mostly fine. Some are good, but some are crap.

      iPhone: If you don't have a specific reason to get a different kind of smartphone, just get an iPhone. They work. They're stable. There's a lot of development for the platform, and lots of things are well supported. I get very few complaints that aren't something obscure (e.g. why can't I sync Exchange public folders to my iPhone?), and most people are ultimately happy with them, even when they didn't think they would be ahead of time. I can tell you how to set up your email on an iPhone without looking it up, because it's the same on every iPhone and iPad. Email doesn't mysteriously stop syncing-- if it stopped syncing, you probably don't have reception or a Wifi connection. It's almost that simple.

    16. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      At least you have an alarm that actually works with the phone off. Neither ios or android does this.

    17. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      Your Blackberry experience matches mine, but the settings menu for Androids is exactly the same across all models. Load the settings app, go to accounts and sync, then press add account. I don't know of an Android phone that doesn't have this exact series of buttons.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    18. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try updating - had a blackberry for 6 years, never had any problems like that. And just because your tech cant upgrade a server properly, does not mean that it is a BlackBerry issue....

    19. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by nine-times · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not all Android phones even have the same physical buttons along the bottom of the screen, and they're in different order sometimes. The procedure that you have to use to get to a list of applications can be different from one phone to another. Older Androids didn't even have Exchange support, though there's a generation of Android models where the manufacturer added in Exchange support before Google did, which I believe also leads to other possible variations in options.

      Now I'm not saying it's bad, but it's not all simple and uniform. A lot of people I support aren't that tech savvy, and I need to give them instructions that are exact, i.e. "Press this button, scroll down halfway through the page until you see something labelled [whatever]. The third option on the next menu will be [whatever]..." If the placement in the list is different or the label is different, you may as well be speaking German.

      And I don't say this because I'm intimately familiar with every model of Android, but I've had the experience of looking at an Android phone and saying, "OK, click this button, scroll down and look for an option that says [whatever]," and having the person on the other end go, "There is no option called [whatever]." Because they had a different model and the settings had been reorganized someplace else.

    20. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Bert64 · · Score: 2

      Businesses should care about closed and locked products, being locked into a single supplier is extremely bad for business long term and making your business depend on something which doesn't have a second source is an extremely bad practice.

      Also in my experience, having both iphone and android for personal use and a work supplied blackberry, is that both web and email are considerably slower on the blackberry as well as both web/mail clients on the blackberry being extremely basic.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    21. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by vakuona · · Score: 2

      I don't know about that. I took my BB out of the country, and switched it off, because I would otherwise incur stupidly steep data charges. I had a daily alarm turned on though...

      First thing was the stupid phone woke up while I was in the plane. Now, that is probably not a big deal, but it turned itself on to ring the alarm. Old phone ued to only ring the alarm, but the blackberry has to turn everything on to ring the alarm. Ridiculous.

      At the time I convinced myself that I had forgotten to turn the damn phone off, so I turned it off again. Very next day it woke up again. To ring the alarm, and proceeded to download my new emails and generally do the shit I had wanted to stop it doing by turning the phone off.

      Bottom line, if I turn off my phone, I don't want the alarm going. If I need the alarm, I will keep the phone on.

    22. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by vakuona · · Score: 1

      Except RIM and Nokia. RIM was still seeing sales growth, although their market share has taken a bettering. Nokia saw smartphone sales haemorrhage. It took them 4 years to bring out a product that is anywhere near competitive. It's proper facepalm failure.

    23. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by vakuona · · Score: 1

      Except that companies are now offering their employees a choice of smartphone. My company allows me to choose between iPhone, Blackberry, Nokia and Samsung. I unfortunately got a BB just before this change of policy and am stuck with it.

    24. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Apple managed to screw it up in iOS too. Its weird how smartphones have the dumbest bugs.

    25. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also (used to) do IT support and found nearly exactly the same thing as Nine-times.

      I'm not a huge fan of apple, but they seemed to be the most stable phones, also they felt... more solid, sturdier.
      BBs, compared even to the android devices I worked with just *feel* cheap and nasty, the few times I had to work with a BB server were.. less than fun.

      I was a massive fan of android and if I buy a new phone it will probably be a galaxy, but when I ran into strange little problems, like having to reboot the phone when going between wifi and 3G or it wouldn't active synch, suddenly not syncing contacts etc. - something inside me died a little.
      and yes, the differences between the handsets was a big annoyance for me too. active synch is called something different on different handsets.
       

    26. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, Nokia phones do stuff iphones will never do. Nokia was just confused as to what the market wanted.

      Did they want multiple bluetooth profiles so they could do all sorts of neat stuff with their device like turn it into a hotspot, mouse, webcam, etc? No.

      Did they want video messages? Did they want to skype with the device? No.

      Did they want an awesome camera to take photos? No.

      Did they want good battery life? No.

      Did they want a sturdy device that wouldn't break if dropped? No.

      Do they want the device to be a "computer in your pocket"? No.

      Do they want an unlocked device like the rest of the world, so that they can finally take back control from the carriers? No.

      Did they just want something pretty with no deep menus that just make the user feel stupid? Yes.

      Can I use it to Facebook? Yes.

      And that is why the iphone kicked Nokia's ass. The US market is weird, that's for sure.

    27. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by acoustix · · Score: 1

      So, you complain about BES (which has a free version) being tied to Microsoft and then pimp ActiveSync, which is also tied to Microsoft? Of course, ActiveSync doesn't even do everything that BES does so it's not an apples to apples comparison.

      How is BIS (the consumer version) crippled? It does everything that BES does EXCEPT tie into BES. Why would a consumer need enterprise functionality? What consumer uses IT policies?

      Even though BB "locks" me into some additional costs, it is by far the easiest platform to manage and to conform to company policies.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    28. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      And their profits are a third what they were 12 months ago.

      It's amazing what "sales" you get when you nearly give your phone away. Just amazing.

    29. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by mkremer · · Score: 1

      Problem with that statement is this is not exclusive to BB.

      I have this on my iPhone right now with VPN in my company and IT is working on this for the Droid Pro as well.

    30. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Apple screwed up some timezone rule changes in a few parts of the world. That's a wee bit different than having alarms routinely screw up if the device hasn't been rebooted in the last few days.

    31. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPhone: [cut-some lyric story about ...] iPhone and iPad. Email doesn't mysteriously stop syncing-- if it stopped syncing, you probably don't have reception or a Wifi connection. It's almost that simple.

      Exactly that is the most likely cause on the other mentioned devices, too.

      Further, most androids are very simular in many ways. the all have app market and settings are like identical especially on same version. What does make some mess and headaches is the stuff telcoms put on it. Nothing dell or hp wouldn't do, typically the big names that feel that urge to brand themselves. But that stuff doesnt change the android underneath, no more than the background image does. Proof of the pudding: apps typically work on all devices.

      So to my opinion, you are severly excaggeration the standardization of Iphone as advantage over android. Android is standard. It has version, just like iOS. apart that, its standard and the 'moved buttons' thingy plain fud.

    32. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That's a feature? When I turn my phone off I'd like it to stay off, thanks.

    33. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      It takes about ten seconds to set up VPN on an iPhone. I'm sure Android is the same.

      I suppose with RIM all THAT traffic has to go through them as well?

    34. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RIM will probably be a case study taught in MBA courses someday. RIM had proprietary technology. A company ran Blackberry server on the back end. When new emails came in for users, the server sent an SMS message to the Blackberry device. This way, the device didn't have to make data connections all day checking for mail. This gave Blackberries a huge advantage in battery life and reliability, because SMS messages were much more reliable than cell data connectivity in the late 90's/early 00's.

      Once they succeeded in the market, they assumed they no longer needed to compete since their customers were locked in. They started producing crappier and crappier devices, because their customers had to buy them, or else use a device with poor battery life, less reliable email, etc.

      However, battery technology and cell data connectivity technology improved over the years to the point that it erased RIM's advantage. Once that happened, RIM was way behind the curve, since they had spent many years scratching their rear instead of improving their OS and hardware. Now, no one wants their devices, so they are going to go out of business because they can't fix their problems before their revenue dries up.

      Not many people see this history, they only see that Blackberry seems to be going out of business "suddenly". RIM's failure actually started 5 years ago, if not longer. Unfortunately, the CEO was probably rewarded for all those years, since the company was more profitable in the short term since they were (hopefully) making big profits by saving money on R&D and such. It is not unusuall for large corporations to reward executives for running a company into the ground, right up until they fire them for when they realize what's happening. But the boards never see their own complicity in the failure.

    35. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RIM failed because when they started to sell consumers they still believed that they are corporate market company. It is the same as Microsoft still believes that Windows is for business users only and looses customers who just need free app store software, web browser and very generic pre-installed applications.
      Microsoft started to lose its platform when almost everybody shifted to web applications development instead of Windows and it failed second time when apple introduced application store having free and super low cost applications. Microsoft still believes that primary PC market is Microsoft office and business automation software.

      Now RIM is hammering last nail into its coffin via forcing all developers to learn brand new QNX system. They all gonna shift to any other OS. RIM has no chance anymore.

      I worked with Koreans in LG Electronics for 6 years, I think they (Sumsung) would teach RIM employees to complete work on time :-) Karma rules!

    36. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by epiphani · · Score: 1

      Good lord, are you an idiot? Have you never seen the "airplane mode" or "data off" or "full shutdown" options?

      --
      .
    37. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they turned it TOWARDS the whirlpool, not towards the beach with bikini-clad volleyball players.

      In their defense, nothing in that statement necessarily indicates that those bikini-clad volleyball players were female and not morbidly obese.

    38. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by cbope · · Score: 1

      And I recall that even the mighty iPhone had problems with the clock/reminders/alarm at the 2012 year turnover, requiring an iOS update to fix, which is NOT available for older devices. How nice of you Apple...

    39. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      There are free implementations of activesync such as z-push (http://z-push.sourceforge.net), and activesync is supported by Android, iOS and WebOS, not just windows mobile.
      There is no free implementation of the blackberry protocols, you are stuck with their server and their handset, no alternatives.

      I successfully host activesync on a linux server, and access it using an android handset... no microsoft at all.

      When last I used BIS...

      You cannot remote wipe your phone (any consumer would need such a feature if their phone was stolen).

      Internet access was restrictive, it only allowed certain services so i couldn't ssh without having a separate data plan in addition to the blackberry one, similarly im
      services are limited - i could use gtalk/aim etc, but couldn't connect to my own jabber service unless i ran it on port 443. With bes, all connections are tunneled out through the server.

      Email support is lousy, you can only configure it to poll your imap server every 15 minutes and you have to give your user/pass to rim and/or the telco.

      You cannot sync your calendar or contacts at all.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    40. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Every other major phone maker quickly shifted gears, to one degree or another, except RIM."

      Every other major maker apart from RIM and Nokia. Nokia eventually shifted gears, after the opposition had lapped them. They've gone from being by far the biggest mobile company in the world to an also-ran that probably still produces the highest volume of dumb phones, but has a tiny share of the massively growing smart phone market.

    41. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me it's gotten to the point where if they can't bring their Android phone to me, and they can't do it themselves with the server settings, I tell them that they must purchase Touchdown for me to support them. For the extra time I would be billing them to try to figure out what phone/OS they are running (they always reply that their phone is a "Droid"), it's far more cost/time efficient for them to buy a $15 app that is uniform on every device.

      I recommend all my customers get iPhones/iPads. I love my Android devices, but I hate supporting them for other people.

    42. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by acoustix · · Score: 1

      BlackBerry Server Express - care to change that statement about no free implementation of BB protocols?

      RIM also has BlackBerry Protect, which for BIS/BES plans is a great way to remotely lock or completely wipe the device. Strike two.

      I didn't have any problems using telnet/ssh clients regardless of BES/BIS. I didn't use jabber so I can't speak to that. With BES the administrator can decide if all connectivity must go through BES. By default, the user can decide. For example - users can download Opera Mini which uses straight TCP/IP connectivity.

      Email support works just fine. You can even run a BIS plan on BESX. BIS has been able to sync contacts and calendar just fine for some time now.

      Just because it's different from activesync doesn't mean that it doesn't work.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    43. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by vakuona · · Score: 1

      I don't read the phone manual. I turned the bloody thing off. I didn't need it in airplane mode. I wanted it off. I didn't want it on data off, I wanted the damn thing off. I didn't want to just leave wifi. I wanted to have it completely off.

      My iPhone stays off when I turn it off. Why can't my BlackBerry?

    44. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      this is a wild idea, but maybe you could have paused the alarm before turning it off. You can pause the alarm in the clock app without actually deleting the alarm itself.

    45. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      just disable the alarm before turning it off

    46. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Or just don't turn it off if you've got an alarm you want to go off....

    47. Re:I don't understand what went wrong by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      and waste battery, shortening battery life by charging or electricity by using the charger, and remembering to turn on airplane mode so mails and such don't wake me up?

      why can every os but ios , android (don't know about wp7) do this properly?

  21. sic transit gloria mundi by mapkinase · · Score: 5, Funny

    RIM joins a long range of former tech prom queens and class presidents that did not make it:

    Palm, altavista, NeXT, digg, motorola, SGI, Sun, Spice Girls.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:sic transit gloria mundi by Swampash · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Dunno if I'd include NeXT in that list. It was bought out by a bigger richer company that wanted its technology and IP, and I'm posting using that technology right now.

    2. Re:sic transit gloria mundi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You could say the same thing about Sun.

    3. Re:sic transit gloria mundi by mapkinase · · Score: 5, Funny

      You are missing the point. I am using the energy and aminoacids from the Shith kebob I ate this morning. It does not make the chicken successful.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    4. Re:sic transit gloria mundi by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I really wouldn't include Altavista and Digg in this list. The rest of those companies had real physical products. Altavista and Digg just set up websites. Some others you might want to add to the list are DEC, Commodore, Tandy, and 3DFX

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:sic transit gloria mundi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the point you're trying to make, I know, but chicken and cattle must be one of the safest species around. Want to ensure the survival of your species? Be tasty to humans!

    6. Re:sic transit gloria mundi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Osborne and Eagle Computers?

    7. Re:sic transit gloria mundi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the awesomest metaphor I've ever read in the history of anything (and I'm not even being sarcastic though I know it sounds like it)

    8. Re:sic transit gloria mundi by BigZee · · Score: 1

      I would. NeXT were going no where, even with Steve Jobs still at the helm. It needed someone like Apple to take it on.

    9. Re:sic transit gloria mundi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The old joke is that NeXT bought Apple---while officially it was the other way around, within a matter of months all of the top people at Apple were from NeXT. Some have described it as an exceedingly creative leveraged buyout of Apple.

    10. Re:sic transit gloria mundi by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Dunno if I'd include NeXT in that list. It was bought out by a bigger richer company that wanted its technology and IP, and I'm posting using that technology right now.

      Actually, I'm surprised Apple didn't make a move. RIM's got a few good patents in their portfolio. One of their biggest is the keyboard patent (yes, the thumb board is patented, which is why the thumbboard on blackberries just feels a LOT better than any other thumbboard around. Too bad that the stuff around the keyboard sucks, though).

      Besides that, though, there are other nice patents RIM holds, mostly FRAND ones, but those are valuable in the sense that Apple can wave those around when other FRAND patent holders demand access to Apple's non-FRAND patents instead of direct cash licensing. (Yes, Apple's been trying to license those 3G patents, and the patent holders have refused to take the money, wanting Apple's patents instead)

    11. Re:sic transit gloria mundi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Actually, I'm surprised Apple didn't make a move. RIM's got a few good patents in their portfolio.

      Unless you've patented fire or the wheel, nobody's handful patents are worth the $12 billion that the RIM CEO apparently think their company is worth.

    12. Re:sic transit gloria mundi by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod-points. That's funny but it's also brilliantly insightful (well, once I read it in context, GP was hidden at first which made it...odd).

    13. Re:sic transit gloria mundi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think 12 billion is an overvalue once you consider what most tech companies that don't anywhere near RIM's install base have sold for lately.

    14. Re:sic transit gloria mundi by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

      If after breakfast, you had suddenly developed feathers, a beak, and the uncontrollable urge to peck at the ground, the chicken might be feeling a certain sense of satisfaction from its coop in Chicken Heaven.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    15. Re:sic transit gloria mundi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree completely - when I see a cow, I just feel sorry for the aurochs.

    16. Re:sic transit gloria mundi by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      NeXT was a not overly successful company that got sold to Apple (or rather bought Apple for a negative price) for it's technology and that technology and most if not all of that technology is prominently featured in currently products. SUN was a big successful company that stopped being successful, was headed for the abyss and got bought out of the bargain bin.

    17. Re:sic transit gloria mundi by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Has Apple bought any of them? Oh right, they're all being bought up by desperate companies who screw up everything they touch (HP), companies that don't actually know much about tech and have their own history of screwing up (Goldman Sachs), or the innocent public.

      Apple seems to be going for little hardware companies that have exactly what they want and growing their own install base. Not to mention I sincerely doubt Apple wants the headache of administering and transitioning RIM and all of it's customers.

    18. Re:sic transit gloria mundi by Truedat · · Score: 0

      Wasn't android "eaten" by google and it is wildly successful? I agree though that NeXT was going nowhere before it's purchase by Apple.

  22. Raising Awareness? by Comboman · · Score: 1

    The purpose of the blackout is raise awareness for the SOPA/PIPA issue among the general public who use websites like Wikipedia and Google but due to a lack of coverage in the mainstream press haven't heard much about the proposed legislation. I doubt any reader of Slashdot isn't already keenly aware of this issue.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:Raising Awareness? by Splab · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Also, I wholeheartedly believe it's the wrong aproach. The US really needs a legal overhaul - SOPA, PIPA and CIPA should be approved, put them through and let people live under this regime for 3-4 months, then people will start to notice how truly wrong the world has become.

      A single day of black out will make people think "oh, but it's not my fight really". Make it stick, force people to jump through hoops to get their youtube and lolcat fix; then action will be taken and it will be swift.

    2. Re:Raising Awareness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "then people will start to notice how truly wrong the world has become"

      I don't believe this to be a realistic expectation. People will take it because they have lost the ability for critical thought. They just do what they are told to do.

      (posting as AC because i'm at work)

    3. Re:Raising Awareness? by ThiagoHP · · Score: 1

      The US really needs a legal overhaul - SOPA, PIPA and CIPA should be approved, put them through and let people live under this regime for 3-4 months, then people will start to notice how truly wrong the world has become.

      My guess would be 3 or 4 years, or, more probably, 30 or 40.

    4. Re:Raising Awareness? by cbope · · Score: 1

      I think you are grossly overestimating Joe Sixpack. Look at the continuous rollback of freedoms and rights since 9/11... it's been what... oh wait, more than 10 years now for fuck's sake! The masses in the US still don't see it coming, and seem willing to continue to let legislation pass that further restricts their freedoms and rights and puts more and more control in the hands of businesses and their paid-for lackeys in Congress and politics in general.

      The black hole is looming and the speed at which the US is heading for it is increasing by the day.

  23. If they are bought by Samsung and expand... by ikarys · · Score: 1, Funny

    there might be a recruitment company cold calling for RIM jobs.

    1. Re:If they are bought by Samsung and expand... by deniable · · Score: 1

      You know where you can stick your RIM jobs.

  24. Re:CENSORED by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

    The Chinese people are generally dissuaded

    Contents owners do have the right to implement technical measures to protect their property rights, but only to extent it is legal (Sony root kit), and why do they want the right to shut down an entire domain, not hosted in the USA, for infringing *Civil* laws that might not even apply in the country where the server is hosted ...?

    i.e. why should I in one country, be prevented in accessing a server in another country, that hosts files that are legal to distribute in both, by a company in third country who has no jurisdiction in either country ...?!

    --
    Puteulanus fenestra mortis
  25. Re:CENSORED by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

    The SOPA subject came on several occasions, and was discussed copiously here on /..
    Adding another SOPA story would do better than a blackout.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  26. Re:CENSORED by deniable · · Score: 1

    No, removing posts is DMCA. SOPA would nuke the domain. Get your stupid laws straight.

  27. Then what are we worried about? by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    I stand corrected. Sweet. If no senators support it what are we worried about? It can't become law without passing the Senate, per my hazy recollections of schoolhouse Rock.

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    1. Re:Then what are we worried about? by brokeninside · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the GP's point. No senators will vote for SOPA because it is a HOUSE bill. Some senators, however, may vote for the corresponding bill (PIPA) in the SENATE.

      Granted, the GP was a bit confusing by talking of senators not supporting SOPA because it is a house bill. Senators support various house bills all the time by lobbying their colleagues in the house to pass this bill or that bill. It's just that, being senators, they don't get to vote on house bills.

    2. Re:Then what are we worried about? by evilbessie · · Score: 1

      To be honest I'm a Brit with only hazy knowledge of US government, and at least in my head support == vote for, this may be a minority view. If I was a US citizen I'd be spamming my representatives right now, as this shit has got to stop, I doubt it will while corporations have so much power.

  28. APPLE should buy RIM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple should buy RIM to capture the Patents and the push email technology. It would be a good merger for Apple.

    1. Re:APPLE should buy RIM by acoustix · · Score: 1

      It would be bad for both companies. Apple has repeatedly said that they don't care about the enterprise. The only thing that Apple would want is the patents.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    2. Re:APPLE should buy RIM by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Patents maybe, the technology probably isn't worth much...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    3. Re:APPLE should buy RIM by MachineShedFred · · Score: 4, Informative

      As someone who works with mobility products in Fortune-50 business, I can tell you that Apple cares quite deeply for the enterprise. They just have a starting point of a consumer device, but with every software release it adds more and more of what enterprise wants. They are asking, enterprise is answering, and Apple is changing their stuff to suit.

      RIM is not, and that's why RIM is dying.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    4. Re:APPLE should buy RIM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing that Apple would want is the patents.

      Apple gets all the patents and fires all the employees. I don't see how this is bad for Apple?

    5. Re:APPLE should buy RIM by fermion · · Score: 1
      I have thought in the past that Apple should by RIM. However, given the problems with infrastructure, I wonder if RIM is worth the money. The value in RIM, after all, at least to the outside casual observer, if the secure enterprise centric proprietary communications. Since the reliability of that infrastructure has been thrown into doubt, anyone who buys the company is going to first have to invest heavily in that. Arguably, rebuilding such infrastructure is not Apple's core competency.

      Rather I would like to see Apple invest in RIM with the understanding that RIM would exclusively build an App for iOS that seamlessly integrates into the RIM proprietary infrastructure. This would have positive effects for both companies. Apple would be able to sell to enterprise using tools that are already familiar, and RIM would have a funding source to cover the substantial fixed costs associated with it's infrastructure. I think there is value to RIM as an independent agent. RIM only needs to expand it's image as primarily a handset manufacturer. It is beyond that. It provide enterprise solutions.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    6. Re:APPLE should buy RIM by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      A better phrasing would be. Apple doesnt focus on the enterprise anymore then they do the general consumer. One ring to rule them all, as it were.

      --
      Good-bye
    7. Re:APPLE should buy RIM by acoustix · · Score: 1

      That is probably a good solution. I do know that RIM is working on a multi-platform server to manage BB, iOS, Android and Windows devices. I'm not sure how long until they release it though.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    8. Re:APPLE should buy RIM by acoustix · · Score: 1

      As someone who works with mobility products in Fortune-50 business, I can tell you that Apple cares quite deeply for the enterprise. They just have a starting point of a consumer device, but with every software release it adds more and more of what enterprise wants. They are asking, enterprise is answering, and Apple is changing their stuff to suit.

      RIM is not, and that's why RIM is dying.

      Is that why Apple stopped selling server hardware? Is that why they don't have anything that can possibly compete with Active Directory?

      Please, Apple's goal is to push their consumer products into the enterprise by using their customers to demand use in business and not providing any tools to manage them. It's been 5 years since the release of the original iPhone. Where's the management tools? Apple simply doesn't care because they don't need to care. They are focused on selling consumer devices that just happen to be used in business. It's actually quite genius - sell the shit out of the consumer product while not really providing support for the enterprise.

      Don't get me wrong - the iPhone is a great device. But I'm tired of everyone acting like it did something new that wasn't available before.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    9. Re:APPLE should buy RIM by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

      Why compete with AD when you can just extend the de facto standard with the attributes you need? Apple published a white paper on exactly how to do that: http://www.inspirednetworks.ca/site/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Modifying_the_Active_Directory_Schema.pdf

      No one was buying Apple server hardware except for very few niche markets, and Apple likes being a company that actually makes money on products. Strange, I know, but that's where it is. There were rare places where an Xserve made sense, and they were brilliant in those places, but the fact remains that you can run tens of thousands of Macs without having a single install of Mac OS X Server in your environment. This is something that should be celebrated, rather than used to deride. It's the opposite of vendor lock-in.

      Re: iOS management tools - Because the world clearly needs even more MDM choices that all do exactly the same thing (what the APIs allow). AirWatch, Good, Motorola MSP, Altiris CMS, FileWave, JAMF, etc. aren't nearly enough. Apple publishes an MDM API (Just like Android, BTW), and lets MDM vendors fight it out for superiority (Just like Google, BTW). If you're a small business that doesn't want to pay for a full-blown MDM, you can get a Mac Mini server and turn on the profile manager service if you want an Apple-provided solution.

      However, enterprise doesn't want an Apple-provided solution for MDM, because they want to manage ALL of their mobile devices from one console - BlackBerry, Android, iOS, WinMo (Yes, it's still out there), WP7, etc. The days of using 18 consoles for 18 different device platforms are over - the world has better tools now.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    10. Re:APPLE should buy RIM by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      Software is killing RIM. The hardware is not the problem.

      I remember too reading on /. that a good portion of their sales are also in Government - particularly military because of all the security and maybe certification it received. So there was talk about the Playbook getting huge orders from the US military. I don't think those ever materialized.

      The Playbook has been a failure. The hardware is awesome (I own one) but the software/OS sucks. I'm hoping 2.0 comes out soon so I can just install Android apps on it.

      As for the BB, I would agree with many other comments. They aren't adapting to market needs for consumer or enterprise. I had one 3 years ago. Happy enough with it. Then I got one of the 9500 series. I feel like bricking it and throwing it away. I'm waiting for my contract to end. There's way too many simple bugs in the OS/apps that they probably won't ever bother to fix.

    11. Re:APPLE should buy RIM by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      RIM "security" is highly overrated. Sure, it was great when e-mail on a phone was a pretty cool (and rare) feature, but now you can get all that security without relying on RIM to keep your secrets just by setting up a VPN server on your LAN.

      Now, getting RIM to let iMessage and BBM interact is worth something, but probably not 12 billion dollars.

  29. Re:Anyone who buys RIM is a fool... by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    I would assume you are buying the patent portfolio and some engineering talent and ditching the rest.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  30. PlayBook OS 2.0 beta changed my view of RIM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I recently bought a PlayBook for $199 and gave it a try. I liked it, but it didn't feel polished. Recently I downloaded and installed the PlayBook OS 2.0 beta and think it feels much more polished. The browser performance is also much better. Now I really like the PlayBook -- even more than my iPad. I especially prefer the form factor. Sure there aren't as many apps for the Playbook, but most apps on iPad are games and duplication. I don't care for games. As long as the apps you need are available on the PlayBook then that is good enough. BlackBerry bridge probably satisfied the email / calendaring needs of users who already own a BlackBerry smartphone, and 2.0 OS will ship with a stand alone email / calendaring application.

    BlackBerry has many loyal fans and a large international market that is helping to fund their operation until BB10 comes out on smartphones (same as PlayBook 2.0 OS). I suspect once BB10 is available on smartphones, BlackBerry fans will have a reason to stay or come back. While I was having my hair cut I overheard a guy talking about his new iPhone and how he regrets switching from BlackBerry. Another guy said he spent so much time learning BB, he doesn't want to have to re-learn everything on iPhone (he must be afraid of technology.) My point is, there are people who actually prefer BlackBerry for whatever reason, no matter what you say to them.

    There could be a money making opportunity here. Everyone in North America is pessimistic about PlayBook and RIM. Write some apps for PlayBook, then when BB10 comes out and BlackBerry fans come back / buy PlayBooks, they will go in the app store and will find only your apps. Of course I'm exaggerating (there are many other apps, but not as many as iPad/Android), but you get the point.

    FYI I am an iPhone user and Android fan. I also have a BlackBerry Bold 9900 from work, and I don't like it. My recent experience with PlayBook changed my opinion of RIM and their future.

    1. Re:PlayBook OS 2.0 beta changed my view of RIM by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Note: if you're a geek in enterprise, you experiment with different technologies.

      There's been many of times I've had a blackberry on my hip, another personal phone in my pocket, and an experimental phone along for the ride.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  31. Bad for the economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about all the RIM jobs?

  32. Re:Anyone who buys RIM is a fool... by Massacrifice · · Score: 1

    And corporate customers too.

    --
    -- Home is where you eat your heart out.
  33. Re:CENSORED by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Any issue that has the ACLU, MoveOn, and the Tea Party Patriots shoulder to shoulder should definitely be paid attention to, and recognized as a universally bad idea.

    If those three organizations can get together on it, surely the rest of us can too?

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  34. from the last linked ot article by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

    "dwarfed by its two superior competitors" Apple and Google. I'll give it to Apple because they actually build products but Google? How much does it matter how large they are they don't make the devices and it isn't either of those companies' only product so it isn't like they are dedicated to the market and that they wouldn't just pump their money elsewhere if it didn't work out.

  35. I Call B$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on the source
    the submitter
    the editor
    even Slashdot deserves better than this.

  36. Re:CENSORED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, simply force *your* opinion down peoples throats. HEY DUDE, WE GOT IT! About two dozens of pages i've visited today removed all content, THATS not the way to get people "to take action", i'm currently more pissed on asswhipes like them than on SOPA, is that what they/you want?!

    STOP FORCE FEEDING US!

  37. Control and SOPA by trolman · · Score: 1

    The MSM owners control this story. The only thing wrong with RIM is lack of MSM funding.

  38. Patents by brucmack · · Score: 2

    RIM may not have a future as an independent company, but they should still be able to fetch a good price. They've got a nice fat patent portfolio, and likely also a nice portfolio of enterprise customers that are too locked-in to be switching from BB anytime soon.

  39. Slashdot's choice of stories is puzzling by walterbyrd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There have been some real news stories, but slashdot won't publish those. Instead slashdot posts stories about rumors - even rumors that have been proved false.

    Can't wait for the next TechGuy Google smear rumor to be published on slashdot.

  40. Re:CENSORED by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    This is the problem everyone has:

    " but only to extent it is legal"

    'Legal' is getting more ridiculous every year. cf copyright.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  41. RIM is adapting, don't kid yourself by 1800maxim · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry but what is RIM not changing? Just about everything? Hardware? Check. Software? Check.

    RIM already has the enterprise market, and it is the most feature-rich mobile enterprise solution. Apple is inching to get there, but they are still a ways off.

    While Apple is inching into enterprise, RIM is inching into consumer. They started at different positions, but attempting to cover both segments. Having said that, RIM will always be enterprise at heart, and apple will always be consumer at heart. Apple isn't known to be a particularly enterprise-oriented solutions provider.

    [this coming from an iPhone user]

    P.S. Ironically, perhaps Apple could fix their iPhone to be more consumer friendly by introducing such basic features as ringer profile management. And when it eventually does build it into the OS, not hail it as the greatest Cupertino invention for a smart phone, but humbly acknowledge its absence as a brain fart.

    1. Re:RIM is adapting, don't kid yourself by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      "While Apple is inching into enterprise, RIM is inching into consumer."

      Well, except that Apple is striding, or at least walking upright, into enterprise and RIM seems to be running away screaming from both its traditional enterprise market AND any inroads they made into the consumer market. Plus they haven't changed what counts: their silly everything-must-go-through-us model that's hurt them badly, both with caving to certain governments and widespread outages. And their software changes... well, they haven't happened yet, and they're way too late. Just last week I watched a law student friend throw his Blackberry against a wall repeatedly because it had locked up, again. The things aren't very reliable software wise, but the hardware certainly is tough!

  42. RIM is already dead by Casca · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They just don't know it yet. I have their latest and greatest 9860 (because I don't have a choice - thanks corporate idiots), and it is a complete and utter piece of shit. The first phone bricked itself within the first week, common problem with this model. The screen is plastic, and feels like it. The touchscreen is horribly inaccurate, making typing on it something dreadful and to be avoided. The on/off button is the entire top of the phone, so when you slip it in a pocket, it is very likely to turn the screen on. It is so under-powered, I'm constantly playing the guessing game of "did I tap the dialog box or not". The "app store" looks like the bargain bin at Blockbuster. Every time I pick this phone up it pisses me off.

    --
    Casca
    1. Re:RIM is already dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. I never knew what all the fuss was about with "smartphones" until I switched from a BlackBerry to a Nexus One 2 years ago. It was night and day. My phone went from being a phone that kind of crappily did e-mail to a useful device. I found it funny that I was constantly told that BlackBerry does e-mail well.... if you get an e-mail with a body over 80K the BlackBerry wouldn't let you view all of it! Ha!

      The only reason RIM is in business at all is that it takes time to change policy at companies that require them.

    2. Re:RIM is already dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's TWO revisions after the original 9800 -- so you can imagine how utterly shitty the original Torch was -- easily the worst phone I've ever had. So I agree - when the "flagship" phone is complete garbage, it's really hard to imagine why anyone would stick with a BB when it comes time for a phone upgrade.

    3. Re:RIM is already dead by Lucky_Norseman · · Score: 1

      if you get an e-mail with a body over 80K the BlackBerry wouldn't let you view all of it! Ha!

      And if you are travelling internationally you will be very happy to come home without facing $10K+ phone bills because your phone auto-downloaded 10M attachments when roaming.

    4. Re:RIM is already dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you get an e-mail with a body over 80K the BlackBerry wouldn't let you view all of it! Ha!

      And if you are travelling internationally you will be very happy to come home without facing $10K+ phone bills because your phone auto-downloaded 10M attachments when roaming.

      Well, the BlackBerry would display a small bit of large e-mails (these were cron job results & SVN check-ins). I would then have to click "More" to ask it to download the entire message. So the defense against auto-download was there. But even when I wanted the full message, 80K was the limit. So even when I knew I wasn't roaming (and had international roaming data anyhow) and couldn't view my entire message.

      I don't miss that phone at all. It was horribly slow, crashed periodically (especially when using the browser). After a crash it would take forever to reboot. It was not an enjoyable experience.

    5. Re:RIM is already dead by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      that's why you have this option for "disable data usage when roaming" duh duh duh duh ..... on real phones, for the real world.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:RIM is already dead by gparent · · Score: 1

      Is the Blackberry OS so shit that there is no "Turn off data when roaming" option? Because on real phones what you said just never has a chance to happen.

    7. Re:RIM is already dead by Casca · · Score: 2

      I almost wish the box had a baggie full of clay in it instead... At least that would be useful.

      --
      Casca
    8. Re:RIM is already dead by Lucky_Norseman · · Score: 2

      BlackBerry too has the option to turn of data when roaming
      But if you turn off data, you are essentially offline.
      With a BlackBerry you can stay online and available and it still won't cost you an arm and a leg.
      Most email are simply a short bit of text with possibly some attachments.
      When I am in another country I get all my normal emails, and most of them I can reply to there and then. If I need to examine the attachments or read a very long mail I can usually wait till I'm back at the hotel with Wifi and read on the laptop.
      80K is a lot of plaintext,. And the limit is actually configurable.

    9. Re:RIM is already dead by gparent · · Score: 1

      The problem is that just -connecting- can cost an arm and a leg. If you dare start transmitting data (which your phone will do as soon as you are connected), you're going to lose the rest of your members.

      This is why people don't really care about the 80K feature. Either you want to connect, or you don't.

    10. Re:RIM is already dead by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The iPhone has a nice little switch to stop it from downloading ANYTHING while roaming. If you do want to go ahead, it downloads a little bit of big messages, and gives you a button to press if you want to see the rest.

  43. Shut it Down by trolman · · Score: 0

    With headlines like this it would have been best to shut down for the day.

  44. Re:CENSORED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *I* came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all outta asses.

  45. Re:CENSORED by Alter_3d · · Score: 1

    No, removing posts is DMCA. SOPA would nuke the domain. Get your stupid laws straight.

    No, SOPA would nuke the domain, then take the hosting companys servers, then dissolve the company, then go to the owners's houses and kick their puppies.

    Wait, what were we talking about?

  46. Call me old fashioned... by Viol8 · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... but...

    "Today i just missed a rescheduled meeting because my BlackBerry failed to ring the alarm"

    You could always try using the memory in your , oh , whats it called, ah yes - brain. Amazingly its worked for humanity for about 2 million years and counting. Give it a try sometime.

    1. Re:Call me old fashioned... by Osgeld · · Score: 2

      some people have more than one thing to remember, and for about 2 million years humanity had to worry about eating and taking a shit, and not much else unless there was a war

    2. Re:Call me old fashioned... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Yes, and we could also manage everything according to our internal clocks instead of relying on those mechanical and digital clocks. But why?

    3. Re:Call me old fashioned... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      some people have more than one thing to remember, and for about 2 million years humanity had to worry about eating and taking a shit

      And bears. You forgot the bears.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Call me old fashioned... by DeanCubed · · Score: 1

      Because when no one had digital clocks, people did not stay up so late thinking that their clock will get them awake. Everyone was up at sunrise because they went to sleep shortly after nightfall (no later than 10PM). They only scheduled meetings for reasonable times when everyone would be awake, like 10AM.

      --
      Born to Play
    5. Re:Call me old fashioned... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Well? Do bears shit in the woods? j/k

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    6. Re:Call me old fashioned... by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      If you can't remember the times and dates for important meetings then you're either senile or you've got learning difficulties.

    7. Re:Call me old fashioned... by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      its called a fucking reminder, not all of us watch every second on the clock 24/7, a little ding to remind you to go to the meeting when your head is down hard at work is nice

      but I guess your some form of superhuman that knows everything at all times...

  47. Bad management killed RIM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I believe RIM is a formerly amazing company suffering from an advanced and fatal case of MBA.

    I always heard that RIM was serious in to business culture. When the company does implode, I bet we'll find that the entire organization was pretty much completely comprised of various levels of middle managers and executives, with very few people getting actual work done.

    RIM's products have severely stagnated and their new OS efforts are pretty much going nowhere. Worse, they can't even seem to port their core messaging functions their new QNX based platform.

    I think that somewhere they fired the core of their technical employees and knowledge workers. I think they've lost too many key assets, and now they're stuck rehashing and re skinning old software on crappy hardware because no one can make it work and some army of bean counters won't pay for serious hardware development. Something is very very rotten in RIM development land.

    I would not be surprised to find that the a lot of the blackberry core messaging functions are implemented in a mysterious binary blob that nobody has the source for anymore.. And that their efforts to implement an emulator/API that works with their new QNX platform have so far failed.That's the only excuse I can imagine for the level of crap coming out of RIM lately.

  48. Re:CENSORED by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    I'm even more pissed off. I've never even been USA, how am I supposed to write to some congressman/senator? They should have at least limited the blackout to USA IP ranges but now every time I go to wikipedia I have to press escape before the page finishes loading.

  49. Re:CENSORED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big deal. It's trivial to set up DNS servers outside the US. Lots of people already use Google's DNS servers (8.8.8.8) rather than their crappy ISP's servers. They'll just start using extra-USA servers if this happens. The only way to stop that is to implement a national firewall, implementing true censorship at the Federal level, and if that happens, then it's time to start breaking out the rifles and picking off politicians left and right.

  50. it's a trap by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    [activate foil hat] But that's exactly what they would say, isn't it?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  51. Supposedly these rumours are not true... by drussell · · Score: 2

    The front page of today's Calgary Herald business section suggests the rumors are not true, Samsung is not interested in RIM:

    http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/Samsung+interested/6012112/story.html

  52. i have 50 bucks in my pocket by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    And even that is too much to offer.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  53. How a Bill Becomes Law by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

    So much is wrong here...

    I think you missed the GP's point. No senators will vote for SOPA because it is a HOUSE bill. Some senators, however, may vote for the corresponding bill (PIPA) in the SENATE.

    PIPA is an alternative bill in the Senate, not the corresponding bill to SOPA. For SOPA to become law, it has to be passed by both houses (same thing for PIPA.)

    If one house passes SOPA and one house passes PIPA, and neither house passes the bill passed by the other house, than neither becomes law (or even goes to the President for signature or veto.)

    Granted, the GP was a bit confusing by talking of senators not supporting SOPA because it is a house bill. Senators support various house bills all the time by lobbying their colleagues in the house to pass this bill or that bill. It's just that, being senators, they don't get to vote on house bills.

    Wrong. They do get to vote on House bills, but only get to do so after the House has passed them. That's how federal laws get made: one house of Congress passes a bill, it goes to the other house, who passes it and sends it to the President, who signs it (or vetoes it, and then has the veto overridden in both houses.)

    A "House bill" or "Senate bill" is just a way of describing where a bill originates. Certain bills (e.g., revenue measures) can only be House bills, but they still need to pass both the House and Senate before they go to the President. If the Senate didn't get to vote on House bills, no revenue measure would ever become law.

  54. Malter Witty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Frankly, though, I don't think RIM has anything of value to offer Samsung.

    Well, except for the prospect of offering "RIM jobs" to attract new engineers, no, it doesn't.

    Tee hee hee! You're a regular comedy god, repeating the same damn stopped-being-funny-long-ago-due-to-overuse joke that appears about RIM in every thread about them.

    And then for good measure you repeated the exact same damn joke later in the same thread so that we could split our sides again just after we'd finished wiping the tears of laughter from our faces from last time.

  55. can't fathom by Frosty-B-Bad · · Score: 1

    All this company has to do is OUTPUT a product they already have in production. I know stuff isnt done overnight but just cut the BS from the projects and ship already. It's painful to watch the decisions of RIM, they have such an iconic name and really nice hardware, just friggin ship OS updates like mad. build interest again. sheesh.. painful...

  56. Rim is not used... by jhon_smith12 · · Score: 1

    The rim card is not use now a days. There are many problem to use rim card for this reason this are banding. On the other hand sim card is more easier . uswebauthority

  57. Isn't that like consolidating losers? by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

    Ignoring the fact the the original article is old and bs anyway....

    Nokia and RIM have nothing to offer each other at the moment. Nokia will probably build up slow and steady based on enterprise services that are part of Windows Phone 7 and also because of tight integration with Windows 8. But Nokia's greatest struggle at the moment is not tech... the tech is good. It is the fact that Nokia is "The Granny Phone". The biggest problem with that are people like my mother who bought and iPod Touch and can't use it because she has nasty dragon lady nails and she can't grasp the concept of using a touch screen with her fingers. She's the only person I know who would be better off with a resistive touch screen. The point being that the granny phone company is moving to technology too complex for granny.

    RIM is the "We used to be the messaging phone company and now everyone else does that better than us and we just got left behind" company. It's truly amazing how a company who had such a "cool status" turned into a "wow... you still use Blackberry?... you must really be nostalgic huh?" kind of company. Having lived in Europe all thee years, I have to say I have never seen a BlackBerry phone up close. There is one store downtown who sells them, but they also sell everything else. So I pretty much have only heard of them. Same goes for Nokia Smart Phones in recent years.

    If you go to a restaurant downtown in Oslo here, you should be cautious to have an identifying case on it. When you walk through the restaurant, people tend to have their phones on the tables and 3 out of 5 phones are iPhone 4s. Then you have the "don't care who makes it" feature phones. And then you have an occasional android phone. The fact that Nokia can't even sell their phones in a country where it used to be 100% Nokia dominated with an oddball Ericsson phone here and there, is pretty sad.

    I think I might stop by one of the last Nokia shops in town and see what the new phones look like. I love Windows 8 and MetroUI. I am running it on two of the machines on my desk as I type this. My laptop and my tablet. But I think it would annoy me on my phone.

  58. Re:CENSORED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is PIPA (not the new stupid law, just the evil lass down the road. I'd still do her throu)

  59. Interesting Read by ConnectingEurope.net · · Score: 1

    Hi Like your post. When you get 5 why not go over to my Business Telecom website www.connectingeurope.net I would really appreciate your comments. Thanks! Iain from ConnectingEurope.net