I'm pretty sure the Bill of Rights covers firearm ownership but I cannot find where it mentioned travel.
Currently a cap and ball or flintlock muzzleloader is not regulated at all. There is no waiting period. No background checks. Not even in the People's Republic of Kalifornia. So it looks like your whole muzzleloader idea is already perfectly implemented.
I would prefer air travel if we were all just packed into sedation chambers. it's a miserable way to spend several hours and we'd all be safer and could fit more people in the flight if we were packed tightly and unconscious. A catheter is probably less invasive than the full body scans we've been getting.
I pack my laptop in the middle of my suitcase. I've never had any damage. And in some cases I'm required to check my laptop as baggage and am not allowed to carry it in cabin.
Examples include: * if my laptop is fully discharged and I cannot boot it for the TSA agent. * if I am travel to a country where I cannot bring a laptop in cabin for security/safety reasons. * if the carry on is limited and I am forced to check my carry on at the gate. if given the choice between my laptop bag and my medication, I'm going to check my laptop.
certainly all the rules and requirements can be adjusted to somehow let us travel with laptops. but every day it seems like the processes are changed and end up being more convoluted and harder for travelers to comply with.
If I don't have a phone and laptop on my destination, the aircraft might as well never have taken off. I don't need to take useless unproductive trips. I'd be better off taking a 1 week trip by train or ship than a 8 hour trip by plane if it means I can accomplish something at my destination. It's not so much a matter of preference as it is a condition for travel.
My theory is the bureaucrats in charge don't have a mind, so can't make it up. Joking aside, I really do believe we have people who don't know what they are doing setting policies.
People have bought food and gas using my stolen identity (from a state I've never visited). So in person fraud does happen. I also had someone buy a TV from Target with my card, but I don't know if it was an online or in store purchase (those details were not given to me).
Foreigners visiting the US have to go inside to pay for gas because our gas pumps required the billing ZIP code when paying by credit card. So be aware and pick the less sketchy looking places to fill up because you're going to be forced to go inside to pay.
I used to work in an iron foundry making car parts. We tested our material in house and attach our QC logs to information we gave to our customers. I'm sure some customers were satisfied with that and started building cars and tractors out of them. But we occasionally would have customers that asked questions and we'd have to show them how we do our tests (lab tour) so I think at least some of them were reading the reports.
Testing is costly and sometimes difficult to do in-house, depending on the nature of the testing. But there is usually the option of a third party to perform the testing for you. The other problem is you might get initial samples that are correct, but later shipments may be sub-standard. It's usually not economical to test every bit of material you purchase, especially if the testing is destructive. It should be possible to test randomly or test batches in order to detect discrepancies early rather than having questionable material in your supply chain for 10 years.
Yes, if they repeatedly refused to fix it. And few of Linux's bugs are remote exploits, where almost all of JavaScript bugs are RE due to the nature of how it is used.
Architecturally it's a bad idea. So not only can we blame the language, we can blame a whole class of languages. Not just the implementations. Requiring a programming language in order to present a document and allowing that language to make requests to other servers when there is no establishment of trust is the fundamental flaw here. On top of that, a language design that makes it difficult to analyze to prove behavior or security is another aspect of design failure that point at the core language.
I can't prove the earlier post's claim that "[the problem of JavaScript security is] one that's very commonly exploited." But it does seem that there are many well known security issues with popular implementations of JavaScript.
Yes, we're making volcanoes in the geological record in order to scam you out of your paycheck. But when an oil company chose to boost octane with tetraethyl lead because it was more profitable people like you didn't ask too many questions.
It was originally a 60 Hz field rate, but it was altered to 59.94 Hz to make space for color bursts. I omitted a lot of other unrelated details too. Do you need to talk about those unmentioned aspects as well?
Old TVs still had resolution, measured in lines. The lines happened to be varying intensity, but you still only could see a few hundred lines per frame. (525 total, 483 active, and around 435 visible)
Slashdot Mirror
I'm pretty sure the Bill of Rights covers firearm ownership but I cannot find where it mentioned travel.
Currently a cap and ball or flintlock muzzleloader is not regulated at all. There is no waiting period. No background checks. Not even in the People's Republic of Kalifornia. So it looks like your whole muzzleloader idea is already perfectly implemented.
And you'll do it with a smile if you want to travel. Nobody says you have an inalienable right to travel by aircraft.
I would prefer air travel if we were all just packed into sedation chambers. it's a miserable way to spend several hours and we'd all be safer and could fit more people in the flight if we were packed tightly and unconscious. A catheter is probably less invasive than the full body scans we've been getting.
How long do you think it takes to ship a package from US to India? As a passenger you're going to beat your package by a few days.
I pack my laptop in the middle of my suitcase. I've never had any damage. And in some cases I'm required to check my laptop as baggage and am not allowed to carry it in cabin.
Examples include:
* if my laptop is fully discharged and I cannot boot it for the TSA agent.
* if I am travel to a country where I cannot bring a laptop in cabin for security/safety reasons.
* if the carry on is limited and I am forced to check my carry on at the gate. if given the choice between my laptop bag and my medication, I'm going to check my laptop.
certainly all the rules and requirements can be adjusted to somehow let us travel with laptops. but every day it seems like the processes are changed and end up being more convoluted and harder for travelers to comply with.
If I don't have a phone and laptop on my destination, the aircraft might as well never have taken off. I don't need to take useless unproductive trips. I'd be better off taking a 1 week trip by train or ship than a 8 hour trip by plane if it means I can accomplish something at my destination. It's not so much a matter of preference as it is a condition for travel.
I wish they would make up their mind already.
My theory is the bureaucrats in charge don't have a mind, so can't make it up. Joking aside, I really do believe we have people who don't know what they are doing setting policies.
I changed all my A's into B's. I didn't want to seem cocky.
People have bought food and gas using my stolen identity (from a state I've never visited). So in person fraud does happen. I also had someone buy a TV from Target with my card, but I don't know if it was an online or in store purchase (those details were not given to me).
Foreigners visiting the US have to go inside to pay for gas because our gas pumps required the billing ZIP code when paying by credit card. So be aware and pick the less sketchy looking places to fill up because you're going to be forced to go inside to pay.
I used to work in an iron foundry making car parts. We tested our material in house and attach our QC logs to information we gave to our customers. I'm sure some customers were satisfied with that and started building cars and tractors out of them. But we occasionally would have customers that asked questions and we'd have to show them how we do our tests (lab tour) so I think at least some of them were reading the reports.
For a car? no. For an airplane, perhaps. If you open a jet airliner you might be entitled to a $30 rebate on your next Boeing or Airbus purchase.
Testing is costly and sometimes difficult to do in-house, depending on the nature of the testing. But there is usually the option of a third party to perform the testing for you.
The other problem is you might get initial samples that are correct, but later shipments may be sub-standard. It's usually not economical to test every bit of material you purchase, especially if the testing is destructive. It should be possible to test randomly or test batches in order to detect discrepancies early rather than having questionable material in your supply chain for 10 years.
For health reasons I only eat vegans.
more than I trust Symantec. With Kaspersky at least the Russian spies won't find my computer bogged down.
Yes, if they repeatedly refused to fix it. And few of Linux's bugs are remote exploits, where almost all of JavaScript bugs are RE due to the nature of how it is used.
Architecturally it's a bad idea. So not only can we blame the language, we can blame a whole class of languages. Not just the implementations. Requiring a programming language in order to present a document and allowing that language to make requests to other servers when there is no establishment of trust is the fundamental flaw here. On top of that, a language design that makes it difficult to analyze to prove behavior or security is another aspect of design failure that point at the core language.
Someone was nice enough to collect a list of JavaScript vulnerabilities. And I also found a list of Proof of Concepts and many of them are for JavaScript and browser. And includes a nice paragraph description for each.
I can't prove the earlier post's claim that "[the problem of JavaScript security is] one that's very commonly exploited."
But it does seem that there are many well known security issues with popular implementations of JavaScript.
And I demand that we stop talking about anything.
Yes, we're making volcanoes in the geological record in order to scam you out of your paycheck. But when an oil company chose to boost octane with tetraethyl lead because it was more profitable people like you didn't ask too many questions.
If half the population dies the first day that food reserve can go for 146 days.
Well excuse me for living in a cave!
Have you tried drinking the blood of your enemies?
It was originally a 60 Hz field rate, but it was altered to 59.94 Hz to make space for color bursts. I omitted a lot of other unrelated details too. Do you need to talk about those unmentioned aspects as well?
Old TVs still had resolution, measured in lines. The lines happened to be varying intensity, but you still only could see a few hundred lines per frame. (525 total, 483 active, and around 435 visible)