Slashdot Mirror


Laptops Could Be Banned From Checked Bags on Planes Due To Fire Risk (cnn.com)

Readers share a report: Laptops could be banned from checked baggage on planes due to a fire risk under a proposal being recommended by an international air safety panel. According to a report, an overheating laptop battery could cause a significant fire in a cargo hold that fire fighting equipment aboard the plane would not be able to extinguish. That could "lead to the loss of the aircraft," according to the proposal. The ban will be considered by the International Civil Aviation Organization, a United Nations organization, at its meeting this month. Even if the organization endorses the proposal from its Dangerous Goods Panel, which is making the recommendation, it would be up to regulators in individual nations to pass rules to enforce it. The U.S. FAA has no comment on the proposal. But it is represented on the panel that is supporting the ban, and its research on the risk of fires from laptops is included in the proposal.

177 comments

  1. Remove the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How much do you want to bet you won't be allowed to remove the battery and take that in your carry on and stow the laptop in checked baggage?

    1. Re:Remove the battery? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 5, Funny

      You insensitive clod! You can't remove batteries from Apple products!

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    2. Re:Remove the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much do you want to bet you won't be allowed to remove the battery and take that in your carry on and stow the laptop in checked baggage?

      I would not be surprising, in fact it would be the simplest approach. Otherwise they'd have to check every checked laptop to see if the battery were installed.

    3. Re:Remove the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Who the hell checks a laptop anyway?

    4. Re:Remove the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, they would have to start hiring people smart enough to know what a battery is, I don't see that happening.

    5. Re:Remove the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You already forgot the rule of US for the 7? countries where you can't take the laptop as a carry on?

    6. Re:Remove the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding! Every laptop I've seen that got checked never survived.

    7. Re:Remove the battery? by Luthair · · Score: 2

      How do you know that Jimbo the Baggage Handler's new laptop isn't working?

    8. Re:Remove the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to those countries you have much bigger problems than not having a laptop

    9. Re:Remove the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't surprise me as it makes for confusion: did she or didn't she .. I thought you meant .. oh - *that* battery .. and so on.

    10. Re:Remove the battery? by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      Yeah, first they made you put your laptop into your checked baggage, now they're going to prohibit it? I wish they would make up their mind already.

      But I agree, checked luggage is a bad idea, better in the cabin where the crew can fight the fire. (Cabin crew is trained and equipped to do so, at least in my company).

    11. Re:Remove the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You can't remove batteries from Apple products!

      Sure you can!
      Once.
      With a hammer.

    12. Re:Remove the battery? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Depends on the product.
      My ca. 2004 12" G4 PowerBok had super easy exchangeable batteries.
      Don't really know when they changed that ...

      https://www.macworld.com/artic...

      I don't use it often, but it runs fine with Mac OS X 10.4 (Panther)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    13. Re:Remove the battery? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I wish they would make up their mind already.

      My theory is the bureaucrats in charge don't have a mind, so can't make it up. Joking aside, I really do believe we have people who don't know what they are doing setting policies.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    14. Re: Remove the battery? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I believe he was referring to checking in the game of Hockey.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    15. Re:Remove the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the amount of laptop models with removable batteries is decreasing rather fast these days.

    16. Re:Remove the battery? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      That's precisely how I discard old iPhones.

      I hit them with a sledge hammer.

      The battery gets HOT.

      I throw the beat uo phone in a bucket of water for a few days.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    17. Re:Remove the battery? by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

      I really do believe we have people who don't know what they are doing setting policies.

      So, what does it take to get a job setting policy? and is it worth it? or is the job so lousy (pay, people) that a reasonable person would much rather work somewhere else?

      Garbage in, garbage out.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    18. Re:Remove the battery? by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      That's not the only reason: checked luggage is handled worse than UPS packages. Why would you put your $500-3000 laptop in your checked baggage where the gorillas will toss it around and abuse it? That's even more likely to cause a problem leading to a battery fire, but why would someone be stupid enough to trust their expensive laptop to the baggage handlers?

    19. Re:Remove the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dubai was on that list. What is the trouble with travelling there exactly?

    20. Re: Remove the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those batteries are lithium ion and can explode if you hit them with a hammer or pierce them. Remove the battery before you smash the phoneâ(TM)s circuitry and boards.

    21. Re: Remove the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Checked a brand new laptop about 10 years ago. The airline lost my luggage and it was delivered a couple of days later, sans laptop which was stolen by TSA, the airline, or the luggage delivery service. Never again. Not to mention they are completely untrustworthy to not mess with devices. Always encrypt your computers and phones. https://ssd.eff.org/

    22. Re: Remove the battery? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Where's the fun in that?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    23. Re: Remove the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Slavery for one.

    24. Re:Remove the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who is forced to by US and UK's recent policies not to allow laptops in cabin baggage.

    25. Re:Remove the battery? by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      yeah, I wouldn't deliberately expose lithium to water

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    26. Re: Remove the battery? by pollarda · · Score: 0

      Works for Hillary. That is how she and her associates disposed of their government property phones while under subpoena. As Secretary of State, she surely used the most advanced security techniques available.

    27. Re:Remove the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea how glad I am that someone brought that up so early in the comments. It's the simplest solution to the problem but the one the bureaucrats will have the most trouble with.

      Keep thinking.

    28. Re:Remove the battery? by blindseer · · Score: 0

      Hilary Clinton? Is that you?

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    29. Re:Remove the battery? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      So, what does it take to get a job setting policy?

      influential friends.

      and is it worth it? or is the job so lousy (pay, people) that a reasonable person would much rather work somewhere else?

      well there is the a lot of job security. and if you're high enough up to be making decisions you can get a the idiot nephews of powerful people hired to start working the system to your advantage. but realistically if you have other skills or interests or scruples you should probably go for a more traditional career.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    30. Re: Remove the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. I didn't realize there was anyone left who would still cling to the email thing while several of Trump's people AND TRUMP continue to do the same thing.

      You might as well still be screaming "Yemen"--wait, sorry, "Benghazi".

    31. Re:Remove the battery? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Whatev, but I'm intrigued by your sig:

      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.

      What are you armed with? Unless you have a fighter jet, a tank, carpet bombs, aircraft carriers, drones, and arms of that magnitude, you're not going after the government.

      That kinda reduces adversarial population to peer group.

      A more realistic grok is:

      I am armed because you are armed.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    32. Re: Remove the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if by "explode", you mean they can pop and catch on fire. It's not a real explosion. Just wear glasses.

    33. Re:Remove the battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lithium METAL reacts to water violently, but lithium ION may not. Otherwise, the calcium in your bones will be reacting with the water in your blood as well.

      The OP was right. A good way to extinguish the flames and minimise the danger of lithium battery fires is to submerge the whole thing in water. It stops the neighbouring cells from overheating and continuing a chain reaction.

      https://youtu.be/vS6KA_Si-m8?t=190

    34. Re:Remove the battery? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Odd. I'm sure I could remove the battery from the last Apple product I owned. So, they've changed the design in the last decade or so?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    35. Re:Remove the battery? by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      Otherwise, the calcium in your bones will be reacting with the water in your blood as well.

      Damn, that just makes my blood boil.

    36. Re:Remove the battery? by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

      Most insightful. 'tis how shit happens.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
  2. Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't the FAA (or was it the DHS) planning on banning laptops in carry on?

    Oh, I guess they regained sanity:
    http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-laptop-ban-20170720-story.html

    1. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't the FAA (or was it the DHS) planning on banning laptops in carry on?

      Oh, I guess they regained sanity:
      http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-laptop-ban-20170720-story.html

      No. they temporarily banned them entirely, no just carry on.

  3. Maybe a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make sense - laptops have not shown to be completely reliable.

  4. if laptop batteries are too dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then tablet and phone batteries must be too... as phones get larger and larger batteries, laptop batteries have been shrinking. some laptops actually have smaller batteries than the typical smartphone these days.

    and don't forget standalone power packs. those cheap chinese pieces of shit (often with no or counterfeit regulatory approvals) are much larger than any of these, and are disasters in the making.

    1. Re:if laptop batteries are too dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      ya, BS rule banning laptops as carry-ons. It might be to separate you from your laptop so TSA can scan its contents before putting it in the cargo hold.

    2. Re:if laptop batteries are too dangerous by mikael · · Score: 1

      The UK was proposing that anyone flying should be able to deposit their carry on luggage ie laptops and smartphones for security checks while the passengers go through duty free and do a bit of shopping. then pick the items afterwards.

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  5. Aren't they already? by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 2

    I was going though some of the rules and guidelines on american flights(I can't remember if it was FAA or other) because I was carrying some hobby camera equipment(*). And it stated that the batteries were not allowed in checked. So I was puzzled when I heard about the ban on laptops in carry-on.

    (*) I did the stupid thing and asking at checkin about a controller for a camera slider/dolly I had in my luggage that had 8 regular AA batteries and I had to open my luggage to uncover it at put it in carry-on. And some of my rechargeable battery banks just about reached the maximum allow capacity.

    1. Re:Aren't they already? by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1

      Aren't they already?

      No.

      https://www.tsa.gov/travel/sec...

      See page 21 -- that stupid TSA website sucks.

      I

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    2. Re:Aren't they already? by Kjella · · Score: 3, Informative

      And it stated that the batteries were not allowed in checked.

      Loose Li-Ion batteries aren't allowed in checked luggage, but since laptop batteries are attached and below 100Wh they're okay.

      A Li-Ion battery cannot be transported in the hold unless attached to a camera or the equipment it is intended to power. The attached battery must not exceed 100Wh in capacity. Spare Li-Ion batteries must be transported in your carry-on luggage. An individual may take on-board, in carry-on luggage, an unspecified number of Li-Ion batteries that have capacities of 100Wh or less (as the operator and state variations allow). Li-Ion batteries that have capacities greater than 100Wh, but less than 160Wh, are restricted to 2 items per person, in carry-on luggage. For example, a crew of 3 people can share the allowance between them and take a total 6 batteries (2 each) in this capacity range. Li-Ion batteries that have capacities greater than 160Wh are forbidden from civil aircraft, unless a state exemption has been obtained (i.e. CAA/FAA operator).

      Now 100Wh is for big cinema rigs and such, a normal DSLR battery is maybe 10-15Wh. I suppose they could be a dick if you have a spare or two but really it would just be to be dicks.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Aren't they already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A laptop battery has half the energy, in Joules, as a hand grenade.

    4. Re:Aren't they already? by Malc · · Score: 1

      Really screwed if you fly through these eight countries:
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...

    5. Re:Aren't they already? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And it stated that the batteries were not allowed in checked. So I was puzzled when I heard about the ban on laptops in carry-on.

      Loose batteries aren't allowed to be checked and must be brought in carry-on due to the short circuit risk they present. Batteries inside devices, even large ones are fine.

    6. Re:Aren't they already? by Xylantiel · · Score: 1

      Good info. I would say it doesn't seem like much of a stretch for laptop batteries to become required to carry-on. Looking around it appears that just lowering that 100Wh limit for attached checked batteries to 50Wh would cause some of the bigger ones to be required to be carried on.

    7. Re:Aren't they already? by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      Yep, read about all those restrictions. Makes air travel impossible in some situations.

      Have been contemplating building an emergency communications portable radio station. Doing it with a relatively high power radio, like 100 watts, requires a big battery that is also a lightweight battery. The only thing that looks to fill that bill is a lithium battery, but since it would be something _I_ built rather than something manufactured, it would be deemed "loose" batteries as well as being about 10X over 100 wh. Just can't fly with that at all, either carry-on or checked.

      So, haven't made up my mind to do it at all yet, and if so, do it with lithium and just never fly with it - drive to the areas of the emergency like Florida and Texas this year, or forget about it. Definitely couldn't get to Puerto Rico with such a setup - can't drive the 1 KwH Li-ion batteries in the trunk of my car. Can't physically hump a lead-acid battery that big all over the place, and would cost a fortune to fly it because of the weight PLUS having it arbitrarily denied boarding on the whim of a TSA agent in Portland, Oregon for another lead-acid "sealed", "non-spillable" which means complying with the rules, but just couldn't take it "because he said so." Had to abandon it at the gate. Fortunately it wasn't very expensive. The Li-ion battery for this radio box is in the $1200 range... so no subjecting it to whims of TSA.

      Flying sucks nowadays y'know? Have been driving where I want to go for the last 5 years. Sold a 3 year old Subaru WRX a couple years ago, that I used to avoid flying, with 124,000 miles on the odometer. Yep, 41,300 miles a year. What happens when your destination is often west of the Mississippi and you live in Virginia.

    8. Re: Aren't they already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But it releases it a hell of a lot slower.

    9. Re:Aren't they already? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Looking around it appears that just lowering that 100Wh limit for attached checked batteries to 50Wh would cause some of the bigger ones to be required to be carried on.

      It's been a while since I needed to shop for a laptop battery. And you reminded me that it's been several weeks since I ran mine down - in progress now. It's just 28Wh. Quite a stretch to a 50 or 100Wh battery - you'd need one of those not-exactly-portable dual-monitor laptop gaming rigs to push that limit.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    10. Re:Aren't they already? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Makes air travel impossible in some situations.

      [...]Just can't fly with that at all, either carry-on or checked.

      Of course you can fly with it. You just need to go through the procedures for shipping dangerous goods. Your logistics officer can give you the details. The paperwork normally only takes a week or two. It might take longer to get you a seat on a cargo plane, but that's a very long way from "impossible" too.

      Land-freight the batteries where they need to go. Sea-freight as necessary. If you're in some sort of emergency response system - well that's why you pre-position equipment in predictable disaster zones - like the Gulf Coast of America.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  6. This should effect zero people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you check a piece of electronics in your luggage, you may as well just throw it in the dumpster.

    1. Re:This should effect zero people. by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      Yep. It might survive in a Pelican case, which are all hideously expensive and heavy, but otherwise, yeah, they'll get beat up...

  7. This is not a good solution by mysidia · · Score: 1

    It is important to be able to travel with your cell phone and laptop on either checked or carry-on luggage as you need; these are somewhat indispensable items for many.

    The concept of "banning them " from modes of travel is patently absurd and unacceptable.

    If the risk is too high by some measure (I seriously doubt it, considering people have successfully been flying with laptops for 20 years), then find ways of mitigating it or allowing people to bring their laptops without causing an undue or excessive burden for travelers --- even if that means the laptop has to be packed in a special kind of hardened bag and pressurized with an inert gas at the luggage station, Or (more on a limb) that the laptop needs a new battery tech or safety cert.

    1. Re:This is not a good solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is important to be able to travel with your cell phone and laptop on either checked or carry-on luggage as you need; these are somewhat indispensable items for many.

      The concept of "banning them " from modes of travel is patently absurd and unacceptable.

      So, then you agree with the solution of only banning them from checked luggage as stated in the title?

    2. Re:This is not a good solution by pr0fessor · · Score: 2

      I have to question how many laptop fires have there been and how many have caused the loss of an entire aircraft. If this was an issue I'm sure it wold have been all over the news and everyone would already be talking about how to make laptops safe.

    3. Re:This is not a good solution by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      I have to question how many laptop fires have there been and how many have caused the loss of an entire aircraft. If this was an issue I'm sure it wold have been all over the news and everyone would already be talking about how to make laptops safe.

      Well, if you google 'laptop fire' you can see they do happen. We don't want to wait till a plane goes down because of one to address the risk. It is a low probability, but a very real one. It makes sense to not put them in checked baggage where a fire cannot be noticed and dealt with quickly, whereas in the cabin it can be.

    4. Re:This is not a good solution by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      If they are turned off and checked in baggage then the chance of them catching fire is minimal, fires usually occur while they are being charged.

    5. Re:This is not a good solution by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      No,
      fires occur when you close your laptop, but it fails to go into sleep mode, for some reason it does calculations, it is in a protective coverage, and you insisted to put it into a suitcase with cloth above and below it, for protection.

      That is the main reason for overheating ... if it is getting hot enough to start a fire is another issue.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re:This is not a good solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, but that isn't going to sell their angle. They will avoid facts like that and talk about the Note 7 or anything else that will persuade them to go through with the ban.

      I'm shocked no one is talking about the fact that TSA checkpoints can read everything on your laptop / phone and the only way to currently circumvent this is to place your laptop in ... *gasp* ... checked luggage.

      It isn't everywhere that does this ...yet, and can be argued that it's for good reason.

      But my money's on that they want to make it hard as hell for you to transfer your computer with you in a way they can't scan it.

    7. Re:This is not a good solution by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      ... find ways of mitigating it or allowing people to bring their laptops without causing an undue or excessive burden for travelers --- even if that means the laptop has to be packed in a special kind of hardened bag and pressurized with an inert gas at the luggage station.

      Or, they could just reserve planes only for those carrying laptops, and those passengers sign a risk waiver. Any empty seats on those flights might be occupied by non-laptop-carriers who also sign a waiver. More administrative overhead to be sure, but I suspect there would be very few people who would refuse to take a flight with a cargo hold full of laptops if it meant getting to their destination sooner and/or cheaper.

      This strikes me as a tempest in a teapot - either that, or there's some nefarious ulterior motive I haven't yet figured out. The whole thing smells so much like bullshit that at the very least it's spent a lot of time in close proximity to a whole herd of the beasts.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    8. Re:This is not a good solution by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      No, fires occur when you close your laptop, but it fails to go into sleep mode, for some reason it does calculations, it is in a protective coverage, and you insisted to put it into a suitcase with cloth above and below it, for protection.

      That is the main reason for overheating ... if it is getting hot enough to start a fire is another issue.

      So, you are saying that is the ONLY way fires start with laptops? I'm not sure how you can be so sure. But, with that said, a not fully latched laptop could open and close with luggage movement.

    9. Re:This is not a good solution by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      I may have misread you post. I don't disagree, just didn't want eliminate other possibilities

    10. Re:This is not a good solution by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      It is not the question of "full latched".

      I had it often enough that a "full latched" laptop did not get into sleep mode.

      No, it is not my only idea that fires start like this, but the parent had the opinion it only can start while charging.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    11. Re:This is not a good solution by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      understood. I misread your post.

    12. Re:This is not a good solution by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Sure if you just closed the lid and stick it in a laptop bag in your suitcase but you shouldn't be putting a running laptop in a bag, asleep or not. This is how you damage a laptop.

      I said usually and not only when charging. It is far more likely that a laptop fire will start when a laptop is powered on and charging. Which is why I said "If they are turned off and checked in baggage then the chance of them catching fire is minimal"

    13. Re:This is not a good solution by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I never switch off my laptops, that is why I have laptops. On the other hand if I'm forced to use a windows laptop it does not seem to be a difference if it boots up wakes up, takes the same absurd amount of time.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    14. Re:This is not a good solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real aim here is to make the regulations impossible to follow, so there is always a valid excuse for ejecting anyone from a flight, arresting them, etc. It is a standard police state tactic, which is to be expected from the fascist leadership we have today.

      #MAGA.

    15. Re:This is not a good solution by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I would rather not bust my laptop open every couple weeks to clean the processor and replace the thermal paste just so I could keep it running while it's in the laptop bag and I'm traveling. I haven't really had an issue with boots times on windows since win 10 and SSD.

    16. Re:This is not a good solution by Xylantiel · · Score: 1

      Seems like making the decision before hundreds of people die is probably better. Even the article summary mentions that they have done actual research to base the recommendations on.

    17. Re:This is not a good solution by countach · · Score: 1

      Will all the people the plane flies over also sign a waiver?

    18. Re: This is not a good solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is far safer to fly than to drive, and much, much safer than that to be on the ground under a plane. You're more likely to die by being impaled on a hangnail than have a plane crash onto you.

    19. Re:This is not a good solution by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well,
      I keep my laptop sleeping, not running ...

      How ever the sleeping can fail, so you have to check beforee you store it if it is really sleeping.

      I doubt there is any need ever to fiddle with thermal paste, unless like in the early 15" first Intel MacBook Pros, where they had a manufacturer fault on the main boards.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    20. Re:This is not a good solution by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      If they are turned off and checked in baggage then the chance of them catching fire is minimal

      Many people don't understand how to turn their laptop off because they didn't RTFM or refuse to RTFM because "it's obvious". And so these various "convenience modes" - sleep, hibernation, whatever they're called get activated, not actually turning the machine off. Turn the laptop off by removing the battery. Slip some sheets of insulator over one or more of the battery contacts before re-installing it. If you install it before reaching your destination.

      Apparently there are some laptops which you can't remove the battery on. That's fine - just ship them with a "not safe for flying" logo installed at the factory or carved into the case.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  8. Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by DatbeDank · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Lithium-Ion batteries are little bombs with the amount of energy they store. As XKCD pointed out, they're trivially easy to explode.

    The only logically safe course of action is to ban all devices containing lithium-ion batteries from flights.

    I knew we were going to reach this point where our desire for safety was going to conflict with our vast desire to be entertained when contained in a tin can flying through the sky!

    So what's it going to be slashdotters? Fly entertained with the risk of being engulfed in a Lithium-Ion fire or be bored senseless and go back to the days of flying with a book?

    I choose entertained, screw going back to the days of flying without electronics!

    1. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      Worst case, I still have my old Nintendo Game Boy in a box in my basement, and I could use that for entertainment on airplanes like I did 25 years ago. It uses very safe alkaline AA batteries. (I even have an lighted frame accessory so that I can make out some of the contents on its indiscernible display.)

    2. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by Ichijo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The only logically safe course of action is to ban all devices containing lithium-ion batteries from flights.

      Including the plane itself?

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    3. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only logically safe course of action is to ban all devices containing lithium-ion batteries from flights.

      They replaced the binders full of paper documents in the cockpits a few years back. I'm sure the crew will be thrilled to return to lugging dead trees around to leaf through. If I have to give up my notebook computer or tablet because the battery is a dense block of energy that has the potential to explode, they have to give up their iPads for exactly the same reason.

    4. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Lithium batteries don't really explode in the way a typical bomb does. They combust, the danger is that they can start a fire rather than cause damage with explosive force.

      So it seems like the answer would be fire suppression in the cabin, rather than a ban, but I suppose if the fire starts in a bag in an overhead locker it might get out of hand before it can be contained manually.

      In any case I doubt there will be a ban because everyone has a phone and many business passengers use laptops in the flight. It would be both impractical and too hard on the bottom line.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Lithium batteries don't really explode in the way a typical bomb does. They combust,
      Uh, Oh! Do you know how a Panzerfaust works, or basically any anti tank weapon? The exact same thing happens if a lith ion battery "explodes". It creates a one yard long flame of super heated metal ions that burn through everything.

      This is a simple one from a very small cell phone battery: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      This one is "exploding" due to overcharging: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      You most definitely don't want explosions like this on a plane.

      During the 90s exploding plane equipment (navigation stuff that had lithium ion batteries build in) was a serious problem.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Also lithium fires can't be put out with water - it just makes them even worse. So the only fire suppression system in a plane that would work on them (other than a bucket of sand) would also suffocate the passengers.

    7. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's part of the problem. People see this as a "bored during flight" issue where life returns back to normal once the plane lands on the ground.

      The problem is, now that I am at my destination (B), how do I use the laptop computer currently sitting on my desk at my original location (A) because I couldn't check it, and I couldn't bring it on carry-on. It will definitely make off-site remote support, travel assistance at remote locations, etc. very difficult when I can't bring my computer with me. Will I need to ship it via alternative means every time? What if it gets delayed / delivered to the wrong address?

      Perhaps the solution is a computer waiting for me at my destination. Does that mean the portable PC / laptop is dead or dying? Or maybe we just have every remote location carry an assortment of replacement batteries...works, as long as the battery is removable from the laptop for travel purposes.

      I think we need new battery technology :)

    8. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, there goes Elon's idea for an all-electric airplane.

    9. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      The amount of lithium in lithium batteries is extremely tiny. Not enough for that to be an issue.

    10. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The exploding luggage problem HAS been solved many years ago... airlines just don't like the solution because it reduces luggage capacity by about 10%.

    11. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the gameboy advanced had had aa batteries

    12. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The take home message from your video is that if someone dedicates the entire weight limit of his carry on allowance to only lithium batteries and then sets it all off in one go, it may burn one or two people and the plane would otherwise land just fine.

      An acceptable risk all around.

    13. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Also lithium fires can't be put out with water - it just makes them even worse. So the only fire suppression system in a plane that would work on them (other than a bucket of sand) would also suffocate the passengers.

      Nope, not even starving the flame of oxygen works.

      The problem is not just one cell venting (with flame). The deal is that reaction generates so much heat that it causes other cells to vent as well to become a runaway reaction. This brought down a UPS plane in 2001 when one battery vented and caused the rest of the batteries to vent as well from the heat . The fire suppression system even had a low pressure option - it vents the cargo hold outside, removing the oxygen. It iddn't put it out.

      Incidentally, water helps only because it cools the cells back down - if you can keep the cells from heating up, you're fine.

    14. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Or it burns a hole into the hull and kills every one.

      Which part of: 'it burns like a bazooka charge' did you miss?

      Lucky you are not working in risk assesment ....

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    15. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1
      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    16. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While a problem, this "hole in the hull" is not actually that big of a deal.

      Proof.

    17. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Or it burns a hole into the hull and kills every one.

      Okay, too many action movies for you. I think it's time you went to bed.

    18. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "Incidentally, water helps only because it cools the cells back down - if you can keep the cells from heating up, you're fine"

      Rubbish. Water and lithium react violently (check out plenty of youtube videos showing this). You might as well chuck petrol on it.

    19. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      No, you should watch the videos again, I posted, or google yourself or read some wikipeedia.
      But it is up to you to underestimate a flame created by burning metals, perhaps google the term 'termite'.

      What do you think why it is already forbidden to carry lith ion batteries in cargo? Because the flight companies consist of idiots?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    20. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Watching a few videos of something that burns and doesn't explode doesn't change anything. I could watch them all day and not feel at risk because, and I can't stress this enough, really I can't, and it doesn't matter how many James Bond films you see, and it doesn't matter how many times you incorrectly use the word bazooka: I feel no risk because burning a hole in the fuselage with thermite or your mythical entire briefcase full of lithium batteries which aren't allowed on the plane anyway WOULD NOT KILL PEOPLE ON A PLANE.

      What do you think why it is already forbidden to carry lith ion batteries in cargo?

      Fire risk in an inaccessible area setting fire to the tinderbox that is the belongings of 300 people. That *could* cause problems for a lot of people through major smoke and fire risk.

      But if it just burnt its way through the fuselage then all you'd experience is a drop of pressure and a controlled and orderly landing at the nearest airport. Whoop de fucking do.

    21. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, water is a great way to put out and prevent lithium BATTERY fire (not to be confused with a lithium METAL fire)

      https://youtu.be/vS6KA_Si-m8?t=190

    22. Re:Banning Lithium-Ion batters on Flights by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Sure, if the water doesn't hit the exposed battery innards.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  9. Here's the solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Store your batteries (or devices) inside explosion- and fire-proof bags.

  10. Umm OK by tylersoze · · Score: 1

    Who the hell checks their laptops anyway? Maybe if it were in a military grade ruggedized container.

    1. Re:Umm OK by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1

      I do. I put the laptop in it's bag and throw that inside my large suitcase along with all my clothes. Never been a problem on SWA. Brings the weight up a bit, but so far that hasn't been an issue on 2 or 3 day work trips.

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    2. Re:Umm OK by OrangeTide · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I pack my laptop in the middle of my suitcase. I've never had any damage. And in some cases I'm required to check my laptop as baggage and am not allowed to carry it in cabin.

      Examples include:
      * if my laptop is fully discharged and I cannot boot it for the TSA agent.
      * if I am travel to a country where I cannot bring a laptop in cabin for security/safety reasons.
      * if the carry on is limited and I am forced to check my carry on at the gate. if given the choice between my laptop bag and my medication, I'm going to check my laptop.

      certainly all the rules and requirements can be adjusted to somehow let us travel with laptops. but every day it seems like the processes are changed and end up being more convoluted and harder for travelers to comply with.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:Umm OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its

    4. Re:Umm OK by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily military-grade. Those are heavy and expensive. I put my laptop in the luggage in a Pelican hard case. It's not too heavy (about 3 pounds) and it's stiff enough that I can stand on top of it without it deforming. That's good enough for me. Has foam padding inside. Never had a problem with a laptop that was inside that case.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
  11. Laptop in checked luggage?! by jdharm · · Score: 2

    Is this a thing? I thought we all quit doing this years ago because it was a guaranteed way to get your laptop stolen.

    1. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, with the US banning them in cabins, and anybody who isn't an idiot refusing the check them .. then what the fuck are we supposed to do?

      Give it a few years ... air travel will require you be naked, shackled, and sedated.

      Air travel has become a bad joke.

      But at least it's a good reason to stay the fuck away from America and all of the bullshit there. That counts for something.

    2. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound very important and authoritative -- not to mention cool -- with your excellent use of profanity! It was also pretty bad ass for you to take that jab at America, too.

      Stay awesome, you! Don't stop being just PERFECT!

      "The fuck are we supposed to do?" Trying reading a goddamn book.

    3. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But at least it's a good reason to stay the fuck away from America

      We're glad not to have you.

    4. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm OK with illiterate people like yourself staying away.

    5. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      then what the fuck are we supposed to do?

      Personally, I ship the laptop (along with anything else that I can't afford to lose) ahead to my destination using a parcel carrier. It's much safer: it pretty much eliminates the risk of theft and nearly guarantees that nothing is going to get lost.

    6. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The fuck are we supposed to do?" Trying reading a goddamn book.

      A lot of us need our laptops to be able to do our jobs once we reach our destinations. A lot of us fly for business reasons, not to go on vacation. The point of us flying is to get somewhere quickly, having to ship our laptops days before our flight is not an option.

    7. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by sdoca · · Score: 1

      Will the ban only apply to passenger planes? What about cargo planes that your laptop is being shipped separately on? Sure, if there's a fire on those planes, not as many people are at risk, but there's still the pilots and whoever the plane may fall out of the sky onto.

    8. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ship the laptop ahead to my destination using a parcel carrier. It's much safer: it pretty much eliminates the risk of theft

      Alternatively, install your OS on a portable SSD or hard drive and borrow a computer at the other end. OS X can run from an external drive. Many Linux distros can be run as "live CD" from USB drives. Even Windows can be installed/copied to an external drive and the system run from that using tools like WinToUSB.

    9. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I think it's only passenger planes -- and even there, they're talking about making exceptions for passenger planes that have upgraded fire suppression systems.

      But this is only a proposal at this point, so who knows what the restrictions would actually be (if they even happen at all).

    10. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      This is one reason why we need more bullet trains.

      And why couldn't you ship your laptop battery ahead of the flight?

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    11. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      How long do you think it takes to ship a package from US to India? As a passenger you're going to beat your package by a few days.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    12. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I would prefer air travel if we were all just packed into sedation chambers. it's a miserable way to spend several hours and we'd all be safer and could fit more people in the flight if we were packed tightly and unconscious. A catheter is probably less invasive than the full body scans we've been getting.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    13. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by stephanruby · · Score: 2

      In some cases, you have no choice anymore.

      Airfare fees are such that everyone brings their stuff as carry-on, so there no longer room for your laptop bag if you're at the end of the line and traveling economy. Plus, because of some rumored terrorist plots, some laptops have already been banned as carry-ons for flights going to and coming back from Muslim countries (except for a couple of countries that have big enough lobbying budgets to influence the US).

    14. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Not if you ship it a few days before you leave.

    15. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      Hopefully in those same few years we'll have the hyperloops up and running. Though with respect to the US, I suppose my hope of that is a bit diminished.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    16. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it'd make for an inconvenient few days prior to leaving... Besides, last I knew the Apple crowd could NOT remove their batteries. It's a handy way to force obsolescence when you don't feel like refreshing your hardware offerings.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    17. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Not if you ship it a few days before you leave.

      So your two-day business trip has you out of commission for, what? Six days? Sounds like that airline just lost a sale.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    18. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Did you know that you can use a laptop with the battery removed?

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    19. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would prefer air travel if we were all just packed into sedation chambers.

      Then you sir, are a coward and a weakling who would impose draconian rule on everyone for your own whiny sense of security. Fuck you and your moral cowardice. A free society is incompatible with the shit you describe, and if you're a big enough idiot to think this in some way preserves your way of life you're too fucking stupid to be allowed to live.

      You may assent be being locked in a sedation chamber for the illusion of safety, but you will have given up your freedom. In which case you can die in your sleep like the coward you are, while pretending that somehow you are getting security in the bargain.

      Go ahead, put on your frilly panties and parade around thinking you live in a free society. But it's assholes like you who will bring ruin to the rest of us.

      Fucking clowns who think shackling all of society for a few hours of safety is helping. The reality is, you're just handing your life over to a government who wishes to control everything you do.

      Pathetic. The abject cowardice of people these days who expect someone to hold their hands and don't much care if fascists are running the show; your solutions are worse than the fucking problem.

    20. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Either I'm a base coward or a pragmatic engineer. The future will judge me more fairly than you have.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    21. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I kind of need my laptop batteries when I'm at home too.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    22. Re:Laptop in checked luggage?! by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      You can use some laptops with the battery removed. Not all are capable of running with the battery removed, due to various types of interesting design choices, including Apple's favorite of 'unremovable battery.'

  12. They aren't already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firstly, who in their right mind would check a laptop. I mean come on. Who the heck would let expensive electronics out of their site at an airport...

    secondly, last time i flew a few months ago i had to declare that there were no lithium ion batteries in my checked bags. They were worried about things like e-cigarettes if i recall the examples of banned items from checked bags..

    Mind you this was in canada, so maybe its different.

    https://www.reddit.com/r/Canad...

    someone else discusses the same thing above.

  13. This IS a good solution by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    It is important to be able to travel with your cell phone and laptop on either checked or carry-on luggage as you need

    It is also important that the plane does not catch fire mid-flight. As an air passenger I tend to rate this higher in importance than your preference to put a laptop in a checked bag. You can still take a laptop with you in carry-on so it's no different from something like a pen-knife which you can only take in checked luggage and not in a carry-on.

    1. Re:This IS a good solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, we do have ways of properly packaging such things so that they will not bring down the plane. However, such ways cost money and would of course present a problem we haven't had to deal with yet: handing a notebook over to the airline to be stowed in a proper container for flight requires them to acknowledge it and give it back to you when your flight is over. Actually holding a corporation accountable for losing and breaking things goes against the American Way (TM, all rights reserved, not applicable in all countries).

    2. Re:This IS a good solution by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      If I don't have a phone and laptop on my destination, the aircraft might as well never have taken off. I don't need to take useless unproductive trips. I'd be better off taking a 1 week trip by train or ship than a 8 hour trip by plane if it means I can accomplish something at my destination. It's not so much a matter of preference as it is a condition for travel.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:This IS a good solution by WheezyJoe · · Score: 2

      Some people need these devices when they arrive. There was a story of band trying to tour the mid-East with their gear, which included iPads and laptops that drive their instruments and display their sheet music. Laptop/tablet ban put a stop to all that.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    4. Re:This IS a good solution by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      There was a story of band trying to tour the mid-East with their gear, which included iPads and laptops that drive their instruments and display their sheet music.

      What kind of "band" on tour doesn't have their set list completely memorized?

    5. Re:This IS a good solution by Langalf · · Score: 1

      What part of "drive their instruments" did you not understand? Even if they knew all their songs without sheet music, if they need computers to run the instruments, and don't have them, their tour is over.

    6. Re: This IS a good solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically they couldn't bring the iPod they play while they wave their hands over the buttons on the mixer.

    7. Re:This IS a good solution by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      What kind of "musicians" need computers to run their instruments? Sounds like they're not actually playing anything themselves, they're just standing there while the computers actually do the work.

      These losers aren't musicians at all.

    8. Re:This IS a good solution by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      If it's one of the genres I'm suspecting it is, the computer is the instrument--for example, trackers are used a lot in quite a few genres and quite a few excellent ones are FOSS--and a lot of the old sound equipment has been replaced by computers, because it turns out that it's easier to haul around a computer than, say, a traditional soundboard which is about the size and sometimes also the weight of a large, solid couch.

      If you're also trying to get your next album ready without having to cut into your touring time--which is a Good Idea because live performances are where musicians currently actually make their money--then you're going to need a laptop along because yes, you can do professional studio work on a computer now. (You can even do it on a 100% FOSS *nix box, if you want to, with excellent results.)

      Basically? If you're big enough that you're on a tour that involves flying places, you're now going to be running a decent chunk of most concerts off computers. You're also going to need music along if you've got any new songs, and/or people who are hired on for just the tour or part of the tour--some bands have to pick up extra people for live performances.

    9. Re:This IS a good solution by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

      What kind of "musicians" need computers to run their instruments? Sounds like they're not actually playing anything themselves, they're just standing there while the computers actually do the work.

      These losers aren't musicians at all.

      I used to think like this. But sequencers are now a fact of life in live music, either because they're all electronic music, or the band is known for recordings that sound fat, fat, fat from adding multiple tracks and they just can't tour with the number of musicians and equipment it would take to replicate it. Both U2 and ZZ Topp are examples of big acts that depend heavily on sequencers when they tour. Try it. Pick your favorite band, watch really carefully and try and match every sound you hear to a dude on stage. Chances are, some sounds are coming out of nowhere. Sequencers, triggered by the drummer or a foot-pedal somewhere. But they might not let you carry 'em on a plane.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
  14. Study Paid for Battery Rental Lobby by mykepredko · · Score: 2

    Seriously, they're very powerful and want to setup kiosks at every Jetway.

    Boarding, return the battery, departing rent a battery.

    They're a hegemony, I tells ya, a HEGEMONY.

    1. Re:Study Paid for Battery Rental Lobby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This assumes that the battery in your laptop is removable. This isn't always the case these days.

  15. BS excuse to steal data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sounds to me like they want everyone to pass through security with their labtops and let the TSA ask for powering them on and getting passwords and decrypting drives (and perhaps sticking in thumb drives and making copies). They can't steal data off a laptop in checked baggage nearly as easily.

    This is nothing but another assault on the 4th amendment.

    1. Re:BS excuse to steal data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you check it in your bag they have just as much or more of a chance to confiscate and hold on to it for as long as they need for "inspection". Oh were sorry your bag got lost, fill out these forms and we will notify you as soon as we locate it, all the while it's been in TSAs possession the entire time. Bag arrives a day or two later after they've been able to image the drive and insert 3 letter agency spying software on it. If its password protected they could just not return it till you agree to decrypt it.

    2. Re:BS excuse to steal data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      simple solution: don't fly anywhere near the TSAs jurisdiction.

      your so called "freedom" in the US is a joke.

  16. TSA will never go for it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not allowing laptops in checked baggage means one less item that the baggage checkers can steal to augment their incomes.

  17. Hang on a sec... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can still bring your laptop with you as a carry-on, isn't this policy then just moving the fire from the luggage compartment to the cabin? Wouldn't a battery fire be a worse thing if it's in the cabin where all the passengers are? Am I missing something here?

    1. Re:Hang on a sec... by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      Easier to detect and deal with a fire, in a pressurized volume accessible by crew than an unobserved, unpressurized one with no access, and hundreds of other bags sitting on and/or around it.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  18. Problem by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    If you remove the battery from your checked-luggage laptop, the baggage hander assigned to stealing your laptop will probably take a big dump in your luggage to teach you a lesson about providing him with incomplete merch.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Problem by mallyn · · Score: 1

      Very eloquently said!!! +5000 code review score! I love you!

      --
      Most Respectfully Yours Mark Allyn Bellingham, Washington
  19. Where do laptops go now? by Taelron · · Score: 2

    Just a couple of months ago wasn't the TSA trying to ban laptops in the cabins of aircraft from different countries? And discussing pushing it to all flights? Sure it wasn't renewed but shows where they want to go So they don't want it in the cabin and now you cant check it... Really trying hard to kill business travel.

  20. What about people that have to do this for work? by haibane · · Score: 0

    So what about people that travel with their laptops for work? I have to have my laptop on me. I guess I'm just going to be expected to print out 100s of pages of presentations each month?

  21. Prediction by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    If this goes through, I would expect it would apply to anything that has a battery within it of X size or capacity.

    Phones, tablets, photo gear, etc. etc.

    The only reason anyone checks a laptop is because the flight crew demands it due to lack of space in the passenger cabin. Be curious how that will play out if the rules state you can't check it at all.

  22. where did your brain go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really trying hard to kill business travel.

    Yes indeed people have traveled for business since the spice traders and now all business travel will come to a total and complete stop because we refuse to turn our commercial airliners into firebombs.

  23. Subject: by ourlovecanlastforeve · · Score: 1

    Alright, so here's the elephant in the room. It's so they can take your laptop and make you put the password in for them.

    1. Re:Subject: by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      And you'll do it with a smile if you want to travel. Nobody says you have an inalienable right to travel by aircraft.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:Subject: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you'll do it with a smile if you want to travel. Nobody says you have an inalienable right to travel by aircraft.

      You don't even have the inalienable right to walk there while wearing clothes or shoes. Sure, you've got a right to travel. Nothing in there about a right to do it while wearing clothes or shoes or using any mode of travel outside of walking (or possibly swimming) though, Tenderfoot.

    3. Re:Subject: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By that logic, no one said you had an inalienable right to an AR-15 or a pistol but that doesn't stop your bitching. What's wrong with a muzzle loader? Both of these things are rights in the Constitution but as usual, you conservatives pick and choose which ones are "important and inalienable".

    4. Re:Subject: by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the Bill of Rights covers firearm ownership but I cannot find where it mentioned travel.

      Currently a cap and ball or flintlock muzzleloader is not regulated at all. There is no waiting period. No background checks. Not even in the People's Republic of Kalifornia. So it looks like your whole muzzleloader idea is already perfectly implemented.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  24. TSA-certified fire containment bags by kiehlster · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... are in our near future. I don't know why bans are the solution when we have fire containment bags on the markets. Why hasn't TSA decided to certify these things and require passengers to store their laptops in such bags? And if they don't have one, just sell them at the checkpoint for a premium? I'd rather have this than have the peace of mind of my laptop or tablet vanishing into oblivion in the checked luggage system.

    1. Re:TSA-certified fire containment bags by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Why would you check a laptop anyway? I mean unless you wanted it to get stolen of course.

    2. Re:TSA-certified fire containment bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the children on board the flight will be at risk. Terrorists on-board the flight might collect all batteries from passengers and short these batteries with paper clips creating a huge bomb.

      On a serious note, best solution I guess is to just leave the batteries at your origin, just carry your power cables with you and use it at your destination. If you can afford and stock is available, buy a new one at destination, but you can't bring these new batteries on your flight back home too. But you might argue, But but but I have Apple products with soldered batteries, then sorry it sucks to be you.

  25. Already banned in some places. by Chris+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Laptops and lithium batteries are already banned from checked baggage in all flight originating from Japan (and probably other places as well) -- I ran into this a couple of months ago flying back from Japan. There are prominent signs reminding you to ensure that all laptops be in carryon bags only, and all checked baggage is screened (via xray machine) for laptops and spare batteries before being checked.

  26. rental batteries at the airport sounds like plan $ by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    rental batteries at the airport sounds like plan to make big buck$ with no whammies.

  27. Fireproof box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could they install a fireproof box somewhere on the plane and require all batteries, or the whole devices, to be safely locked inside?

    It would vent to the outside, of course. Maybe should be in the otherwise empty tail section.

  28. Might not make it onto the plane anyways by burk3 · · Score: 1

    I always carry-on my laptop/portables/videogame consoles/etc when I am flying. I have heard too many anecdotes about checked electronics straight up getting stolen during an "inspection" of checked baggage and there is basically 0 you can do about it. No idea if this is still a problem, but I don't feel like risking it just to avoid the hassle of having to pull out multiple items into separate bins to get scanned individually.

  29. We'll All Be Completely Safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And no one will want to fly.

    Hwut?

  30. passenger compartment is better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just imagine everyone scrambling to get phones to record it or run away. The luggage compartment could be flooded with an inert gas. That won't extinguish lithium batteries but it would keep it from spreading.

  31. If this becomes a real thing in the US.... by Drakonblayde · · Score: 1

    Then the airlines are going to lose a horrible amount of business. There's no way in hell I'm letting my personal laptop or work laptop out of my possession during travel. I will simply drive (I have to get a rental when I get to the location anyway) or I will take an alternate mode of transportation such as a bus or train. It may take a little longer, and will likely make my employer unhappy, but have to draw the line somewhere.

    1. Re:If this becomes a real thing in the US.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try reading the article before posting angry screeds, doofus.

  32. Surprised they took so long by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2

    Lithium ion batteries store a LOT of energy, and it's not that hard to get them to ignite, at which point they burn VERY hot. Plenty of YouTube videos with lithium ion battery fires. Go watch some before attempting to explain how safe they are on an airliner.

    A bunch of bad people could carry laptops on the same flight, and short out the battery packs with a paper clip. Not very difficult with most batteries. Even Apple products could be modded to make the batteries vulnerable.

    Checked baggage or carry-on, lithium ion batteries are a problem either way. A laptop could serve as it's own timer, with a hardware mod to close a relay and short out the batteries while the damn thing sits in the cargo hold. As an added bonus, nobody can get in while the plane is in flight. Sure, there is a fire suppression system, but I wouldn't bet on it because such fires are difficult to extinguish.

  33. This is what cabin bags are for by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    If I don't have a phone and laptop on my destination, the aircraft might as well never have taken off.

    So put them in your cabin baggage. It's safer AND you are far more likely to have them when you get there since checked bags don't always arrive on time. They are only wanting to ban laptops in checked baggage.

  34. Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modern laptops have proprietary chips built by Intell that never turn off and they probably have a history scrapper via USB some how. When you check, it would be a lot harder to do.

  35. How does that jive with the cabin ban? by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    Isn't there also a ban on electronics in the cabin? So no laptop in carry-on or in checked baggage means no laptop at all. I guess the solution is to FedEx your stuff overnight and hope that it shows up for the business meeting. Too bad AmTrak trains are so slow and infrequent.

  36. The carriers can do it themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why buy your own $500 bag, when a SMART airline can use its own methods to contain fires in cargo holds?
    https://www.newtex.com/nes/fire-containment-covers
    If it's part of the design of the cargo hold, it's not even an additional item.
    It's a no-brainer for the airliner to do this, but far too simple, of course.

  37. PenDrive by NewYork · · Score: 1

    I carry a PenDrive, not Laptop; https://askubuntu.com/question...