And thus the American frontier was closed forever. Having a family gathering in park just outside of town that happens to be wooded and have a small lake? $450 for six hours of indemnity covering no more than twelve people. Cant pay it? Stay out of the park.
The National Parks are America's greatest natural treasures, but they come with the downside of the unpredictability of nature and the inherent hazards thereof. Regulate medicine, regulate markets, but let wilderness be wilderness. Park Rangers should hand out copies of Nash's "Wilderness and the American Mind" the way Gideons hand out the Bible to hotels.
As gas station's branding says nothing as to what company actually pumped and refined the oil into gasoline and other products. All of it passes on commodity markets and gets traded and homogenized and sold in lots.
Given the technical savvy of the judiciary in general, I think such a name for a torrent tracker if it hosted the same content as the pirate bay would more likely endanger Linux ISO's than protect the torrent tracker.
Alright, there was some degree of amphiboly in my wording. The meaning intended was that Microsoft is not abandoning flash, but with the HTML 5 video tag it is only allowing the H.264 codec to play.
Exactly why I'm running a cheap touchscreen Nokia powered by Symbian. It is a great communications tool and personal organizer, and the plan it runs on is inexpensive. It won't win any beauty contests nor will this particular phone offer stellar performance as a portable entertainment device.
Differing needs fuel demand for different devices. Its why Blackberry will be around for the foreseeable future, why KIN will probably take a lot of the market feature phones held, and that simple candybar and flip phones still exist.
Most ads are pay per click, and advertisers seem to prefer paying for people to actually go to their site. Pay for impression ads on do still exist on the internet. Pepsi and Gillette don't really need to get you to their site in the way that an online store does. Big brands paying for awareness are among advertisers who will pay per impression.
The problem is that to continue to do business revenue must be greater than expenses. The question is how well prepared is the New York Times to balance subscription revenue and advertising revenue.
Over time the questions are will the limited free views satisfy light to moderate readers and how long can they sustain a population of subscribing heavy and local readers.
My prognostication is that Gawker Media in the next year starts going after some of the audience that reads the times for its editorial and higher brow coverage, probably opening another New York blog or sub blog.
Even with the printed newspaper I was under the impression that advertisers were still the most relevant revenue stream. News has always been about selling advertisements. The issue is the rapid expansion in venues in which are open to advertisers. Conde Nast has the same problem.
There are reasons to prefer digital and multimedia methods of presentation and documentation, but for starting out handwriting and drawing are simpler than generating complex multimedia documentation and models. Perhaps my suggestion of a notebooks was limiting, but I stand by it in terms of a potentially useful tool for cultivating experiences that promote a scientific ethic of test, observe, record, and document. At the time I posted the original comment suggestions concerning documentation were lacking.
What ever kit or instruments you procure them for Christmas, accompany it with a good notebook and some durable pens. The experiment is the cool stuff, but the recording of the story of how you explain the consequences it the real value you can bring to early explorations of science.
A real lab notebook with numbered and permanently bound pages for your young scientist to record their adventures, possibly from a university bookstore with a university logo on it may do something to increase its appeal. Comparisons to a Captain's log might help your sell, but saying its like a diary might hurt your case.
I'm afraid that allowing educators the rights to distribute their works would do more to encourage open access educational materials than would assigning the rights of the materials to the educational institutions. A few educators distributing their materials freely seems as though it would lead to more quality free (as in speech) material than consigning the material's distribution to the institutions and counting on the schools to open materials assigned to them
A large number of professors work at public universities and manage to retain rights to the works that they produce. While I generally favor open access to information, part of what makes open access possible is that the creators have the right to distribute their work as they may. If work produced by educators of all scopes is a work for hire, then rather than being up to the work's creators to distribute their employing institution would have rights to distribute their works.
Institutional rights to employee works would fundamentally change the nature of academic publishing and the flow of educational materials.
Fundamentally education is about cultivating experiences. Whether in a university or in a primary school the person in the room drawing a check is there to engage the students in an experience that hopefully benefits the students. Whatever materials the educator employs to contribute to or supplement the educational experience are distinct from the educator's mission of cultivating experience. Teaching style is a very personal thing that varies greatly among different educators. When an educator produces any materials on their own to assist them in their mission of education it is largely a sign that they are working to maximize the quality of educational experience that they can provide their students. Rather than providing a disincentive to doing this by claiming their products as mere works for hire, it should be encouraged by continuing to recognize supplementary educational material produced by educators as works to which they are entitled to have rights.
I have to wonder what happens if God forbid someone was to cite one of these texts and attribute a quote to a copy which may be materially different to another copy of the same text. Is each copy to be treated as its own addition?
If someone wants their TI-89 to operate under the rule that 2+2=5 or that pi=3, it is only righteous for them to do math as their whims dictate. Peforming non-arithmetic addition should be something someone only needs to switch the operating system to accomplish. Asking someone to create chips to accomplish the task sets the bar for prank calculators artificially high.
Slashdot Mirror
And thus the American frontier was closed forever. Having a family gathering in park just outside of town that happens to be wooded and have a small lake? $450 for six hours of indemnity covering no more than twelve people. Cant pay it? Stay out of the park.
The National Parks are America's greatest natural treasures, but they come with the downside of the unpredictability of nature and the inherent hazards thereof. Regulate medicine, regulate markets, but let wilderness be wilderness. Park Rangers should hand out copies of Nash's "Wilderness and the American Mind" the way Gideons hand out the Bible to hotels.
As gas station's branding says nothing as to what company actually pumped and refined the oil into gasoline and other products. All of it passes on commodity markets and gets traded and homogenized and sold in lots.
Given the technical savvy of the judiciary in general, I think such a name for a torrent tracker if it hosted the same content as the pirate bay would more likely endanger Linux ISO's than protect the torrent tracker.
Alright, there was some degree of amphiboly in my wording. The meaning intended was that Microsoft is not abandoning flash, but with the HTML 5 video tag it is only allowing the H.264 codec to play.
This says nothing about abandoning flash, just only allowing H.264 video with a video tag.
I'm pretty sure Microsoft still has the rights to the Halo franchise and is pushing Halo development after Halo Reach to 343 Industries.
Exactly why I'm running a cheap touchscreen Nokia powered by Symbian. It is a great communications tool and personal organizer, and the plan it runs on is inexpensive. It won't win any beauty contests nor will this particular phone offer stellar performance as a portable entertainment device.
Differing needs fuel demand for different devices. Its why Blackberry will be around for the foreseeable future, why KIN will probably take a lot of the market feature phones held, and that simple candybar and flip phones still exist.
And tritium is used in sealed glass capsules as a source of illumination in consumer products like Luminox watches.
I liked the article from a while back that proposed Thorium as the fuel of the future much better.
Facebook isn't the social, its a simulation of the social. Hell, it might even be a simulacra of a simulation.
I doubt it will have to see a judge. Some staffer will make an apology and maybe get canned, then some underling's slip up turns into a talking point.
Most ads are pay per click, and advertisers seem to prefer paying for people to actually go to their site. Pay for impression ads on do still exist on the internet. Pepsi and Gillette don't really need to get you to their site in the way that an online store does. Big brands paying for awareness are among advertisers who will pay per impression.
The problem is that to continue to do business revenue must be greater than expenses. The question is how well prepared is the New York Times to balance subscription revenue and advertising revenue.
Over time the questions are will the limited free views satisfy light to moderate readers and how long can they sustain a population of subscribing heavy and local readers.
My prognostication is that Gawker Media in the next year starts going after some of the audience that reads the times for its editorial and higher brow coverage, probably opening another New York blog or sub blog.
Even with the printed newspaper I was under the impression that advertisers were still the most relevant revenue stream. News has always been about selling advertisements. The issue is the rapid expansion in venues in which are open to advertisers. Conde Nast has the same problem.
There are reasons to prefer digital and multimedia methods of presentation and documentation, but for starting out handwriting and drawing are simpler than generating complex multimedia documentation and models. Perhaps my suggestion of a notebooks was limiting, but I stand by it in terms of a potentially useful tool for cultivating experiences that promote a scientific ethic of test, observe, record, and document. At the time I posted the original comment suggestions concerning documentation were lacking.
What ever kit or instruments you procure them for Christmas, accompany it with a good notebook and some durable pens. The experiment is the cool stuff, but the recording of the story of how you explain the consequences it the real value you can bring to early explorations of science. A real lab notebook with numbered and permanently bound pages for your young scientist to record their adventures, possibly from a university bookstore with a university logo on it may do something to increase its appeal. Comparisons to a Captain's log might help your sell, but saying its like a diary might hurt your case.
I really don't know what is more sad, regulating internet speech for political reasons or doing the same for commercial reasons.
I'm afraid that allowing educators the rights to distribute their works would do more to encourage open access educational materials than would assigning the rights of the materials to the educational institutions. A few educators distributing their materials freely seems as though it would lead to more quality free (as in speech) material than consigning the material's distribution to the institutions and counting on the schools to open materials assigned to them
A large number of professors work at public universities and manage to retain rights to the works that they produce. While I generally favor open access to information, part of what makes open access possible is that the creators have the right to distribute their work as they may. If work produced by educators of all scopes is a work for hire, then rather than being up to the work's creators to distribute their employing institution would have rights to distribute their works. Institutional rights to employee works would fundamentally change the nature of academic publishing and the flow of educational materials. Fundamentally education is about cultivating experiences. Whether in a university or in a primary school the person in the room drawing a check is there to engage the students in an experience that hopefully benefits the students. Whatever materials the educator employs to contribute to or supplement the educational experience are distinct from the educator's mission of cultivating experience. Teaching style is a very personal thing that varies greatly among different educators. When an educator produces any materials on their own to assist them in their mission of education it is largely a sign that they are working to maximize the quality of educational experience that they can provide their students. Rather than providing a disincentive to doing this by claiming their products as mere works for hire, it should be encouraged by continuing to recognize supplementary educational material produced by educators as works to which they are entitled to have rights.
Merely contributing to the abundance of existing implementations of the technique described in the patent.
I have to wonder what happens if God forbid someone was to cite one of these texts and attribute a quote to a copy which may be materially different to another copy of the same text. Is each copy to be treated as its own addition?
If someone wants their TI-89 to operate under the rule that 2+2=5 or that pi=3, it is only righteous for them to do math as their whims dictate. Peforming non-arithmetic addition should be something someone only needs to switch the operating system to accomplish. Asking someone to create chips to accomplish the task sets the bar for prank calculators artificially high.
There is no freedom if everything is criminal.
But wouldn't an arms race be good for the economy?
I have to wonder if there might be a way to get spam filters to recognize machine translations.
Its both.Photoshop erodes women's confidence in their looks, so when you add sufficient beer they look like covergirls.