Slashdot Mirror


Science Gifts For Kids?

beernutmark writes "I have two science-loving kids ages 7 and 9. My youngest knew Neil deGrasse Tyson's name at age 4. With the holidays coming up, I am looking to get them some quality science-related tools. Two items on the list are a quality microscope and/or a real rock-hounding kit. I am looking for any other gift suggestions for this year or future years (or even for younger kids for other readers) and hints on good sources."

368 comments

  1. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Think Geek

    1. Re:Anonymous Coward by Munk · · Score: 1

      Definitely agree with ThinkGeek. They have great stuff. I just ordered 3 things from them yesterday for various kids that I have to buy for (including my own).

    2. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would have to agree. They have a very nice USB microscope that would allow your kids to take pictures and even movies of what they see. It's much more interactive than an ordinary microscope.

      Matt

    3. Re:Anonymous Coward by TheCycoONE · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree Think Geek is a good place to go for ideas, but once you've found something check the websites of the neighborhood box stores. I've often found that I can find the same thing at Canadian Tire or some other shop for a lot less money and no wait.

    4. Re:Anonymous Coward by buswolley · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      By kids, you mean your friends? Right? jk

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    5. Re:Anonymous Coward by arogier · · Score: 4, Informative

      What ever kit or instruments you procure them for Christmas, accompany it with a good notebook and some durable pens. The experiment is the cool stuff, but the recording of the story of how you explain the consequences it the real value you can bring to early explorations of science. A real lab notebook with numbered and permanently bound pages for your young scientist to record their adventures, possibly from a university bookstore with a university logo on it may do something to increase its appeal. Comparisons to a Captain's log might help your sell, but saying its like a diary might hurt your case.

    6. Re:Anonymous Coward by beernutmark · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ha. Nope they are mine (or at least I am told so). We tried natural parenting and then...

    7. Re:Anonymous Coward by andyring · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I had earlier versions of these:

      http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId=3814337#

      as a kid and learned a ton. Loved those kits!

    8. Re:Anonymous Coward by eepoke · · Score: 1

      Along the same lines, Snap Circuits are a little easier to work with, though less capable. I also had earlier versions of your link, and absolutely loved them.

    9. Re:Anonymous Coward by inflamed · · Score: 1

      Wrong. I am a scientist and hate writing in my note book. I much prefer digital multimedia documentation of my experiments.

    10. Re:Anonymous Coward by tool462 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I was using these kits around that age.

      Depending on how advanced and ambitious they are, they have some like that one but with microcontrollers as well.

      There's also ready-made robotics kits like Lego Mindstorms and Boe Bot http://www.parallax.com/tabid/411/Default.aspx

    11. Re:Anonymous Coward by inKubus · · Score: 1

      The place in my signature has some cool stuff, you don't have a ton of time to online order stuff however. Get on it! ;)

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    12. Re:Anonymous Coward by arogier · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are reasons to prefer digital and multimedia methods of presentation and documentation, but for starting out handwriting and drawing are simpler than generating complex multimedia documentation and models. Perhaps my suggestion of a notebooks was limiting, but I stand by it in terms of a potentially useful tool for cultivating experiences that promote a scientific ethic of test, observe, record, and document. At the time I posted the original comment suggestions concerning documentation were lacking.

    13. Re:Anonymous Coward by garnkelflax · · Score: 1

      I love those things. I saved my money from mowing lawns and bought the 200 in 1 project kit from Radio Shack back around 1981 or 1982. I still have some very large breadboards, my 1950's heathkit oscope, and a bazillion ICs, and components. One of the breadboards still has an audio digitizer I built for my Amiga back in the early 90's. I bought one of the more recent radio shack kits with the built in breadboard for my kids about 5 years ago. But when they were 8 and 9 they had trouble with pushing the wires into the breadboard. I hunted ebay and found a few of the same vintage model that I had with the good old spring terminals. I bought two of them so I would have a backup. The kids drag it out about once a month and build something. They still don't touch the new one. The old one has the typical complement of resistors, capacitors, transistors, relay, transformers, great manual etc... and a 7400 nand and 7476 Dual JK flip flop. Searching on the web, some are trying to sell them as hard-to-find with an $80+ USD price tag. But ebay still has them with $10 bids.

    14. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best low cost microscopes and telescopes can be found on the Goodwill Auction site:
      http://www.shopgoodwill.com/

    15. Re:Anonymous Coward by cetialphav · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is for a kid, not a professional scientist. Pen and paper was good enough for Newton, so I'm sure it will work out fine for the kinds of experiments a kid will likely do. Even for many professionals, a notebook is very valuable. Archaeologists are known to have problems using software to accurately represent stratigraphic data and they often just draw things out by hand.

      Pen and paper are still used by many professionals so I see no reason to make a kid jump through hoops to learn a word processor or spreadsheet when he can just write the stuff down.

    16. Re:Anonymous Coward by samkass · · Score: 1

      Snap Circuits appear to be the modern equivalent of those old Radio Shack spring-and-wire kits you could buy in the 70's.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    17. Re:Anonymous Coward by SleepingWaterBear · · Score: 1

      What ever kit or instruments you procure them for Christmas, accompany it with a good notebook and some durable pens. The experiment is the cool stuff, but the recording of the story of how you explain the consequences it the real value you can bring to early explorations of science. A real lab notebook with numbered and permanently bound pages for your young scientist to record their adventures, possibly from a university bookstore with a university logo on it may do something to increase its appeal. Comparisons to a Captain's log might help your sell, but saying its like a diary might hurt your case.

      I'm going to disagree here. While careful documentation of your work is essential for a scientist, I think it's the wrong thing to emphasize. If you stress the boring side of science, you're likely to discourage interest in the subject matter, and in any case, having a kid just imitate scientists without an understanding of why they do things is no way to teach the scientific mindset.

      Scientists record their work because it makes practical sense given their goals. If the result of an experiment depends on careful measurement and analysis of data, the scientists will diligently record the data he needs, and explicitly write out his analysis so as to avoid error. However, most science kits for kids focus on exciting immediately visible results of the sort which a scientist would have no reason to document except for the purpose of publication. When my fake volcano explodes, what exactly am I supposed to record anyway? Making a child mimic the 'scientific method' in this case sends a very confusing message about what science is and how it works. Most children will miss the point, and the more clever children will be confused wondering why they're doing it.

      If you really want to teach scientific thought you should start by focusing on exciting experiments that capture the imagination. You should emphasize understanding why things happen instead of cataloguing what happens. If the experiment is supposed to demonstrate some principle, don't have the kid write down what he saw, talk it through with him. Ask him why he thinks it works the way it does, and use questions to help him guess the right answer. Ask him how he'd confirm his guesses with more experiments. Documentation should fall out as a natural necessity rather than as a ritual followed dogmatically.

    18. Re:Anonymous Coward by beernutmark · · Score: 1

      I had forgotten how much fun I used to have with my radio shack kit. Making the crystal radio blew my mind.

      Those snap circuits look to have all the fun with less of the broken/lost parts.

      Thanks to everyone who suggested them!

    19. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thinkgeek.com is the coolest thing ever

    20. Re:Anonymous Coward by wiggums66 · · Score: 1

      http://www.thinkgeek.com/brain/gift_finder.cgi That would be it for me too...I just got all of my Christmas shopping done with one stop...ThinkGeek...Love it!

    21. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I actually had the Think Geek USB microscope and it was awful. I tried to use it for a pond water class. Couldn't see much of anything. Edmund Scientific has a much nicer USB/projection microscope. It's a bit pricier, but not much considering the quality. The toys at scientificsonline.com are awesome!

    22. Re:Anonymous Coward by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      When I was nine, I hated my future brother-in-law Until he gave me one of these. It was the best present I ever received and I played with it for years. I forgave my brother-in-law

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    23. Re:Anonymous Coward by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

      Goodwill has an online auction site and regularly has microscopes listed. You see a lot of department-store quality stuff, but occasionally a great deal comes up. I got a 400x stereo microscope for $50.

      Failing that, the new Bioic Eye (Wal Mart, $100) has selectable magnification levels.

      -ellie

    24. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "notebook and some durable pens"
      Where do you see a "computer"? Just so you do not get too confused, search 'paper notebook' ...

    25. Re:Anonymous Coward by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Some parents pressure a child into a career by pressuring them in high school/college.

      Smart parents (like mine) corrupt you before you're old enough realize it with Radio Shack electronics kits. :)

      In my case, they were the various spring-based N-in-1 kits. I see from other posts that the newer ones are harder for little kids to work with.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  2. Telescope by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they Dig astronomy that is

    1. Re:Telescope by middlemen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And if you have a hot neighbor as well ;)

    2. Re:Telescope by global_diffusion · · Score: 1

      Yes. This is perfect. You get the magic of the stars, planets and moon, as well as the fun of optics. This is a gift that will be used for years. Mod Parent Up!!!

    3. Re:Telescope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Seconding the telescope option. But don't do it if you're getting them a crappy one - it's easy to get discouraged with garbage. Do some research and don't get sucked in by marketing ploys advertising 99999999x magnification or whatever. Get a decent reflector with a useable aperture and good eyepieces.

      And yes, IAAA (I am an astronomer).

    4. Re:Telescope by beernutmark · · Score: 1

      Agree about the quality telescope. In fact we already have a 10" Orion Dob that we love.

      The point about quality is what really made me think about posting to /. A family member recently purchased a p.o.s. microscope which the oldest was super excited about but was used for exactly 1 hour before being put on the shelf never to be used again. I couldn't see s**t though it myself.

    5. Re:Telescope by atomistic · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you get a telescope for them, be sure to make it a decent reflector. One of the biggest ways people go wrong getting into stargazing is by getting a cheap telescope that is worse than a pair of binoculars. Not only is the result blurry, but you can't get enough light to see the fainter objects that are the most interesting. Contact your local astronomical society for a good deal on a used scope. You might even be able to get a mount for a digital camera so your kids can photograph what they see and send it to relatives or post online. A photo they take of the moon or Jupiter will really make them smile and be encouraged. If you get REALLY into it, you can check out some of the amateur research requests on AAVSO. :) But little steps at first.

    6. Re:Telescope by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Telescopes are a lot more fun if you know enough about the sky to find your way around (although these days, with so many high-tech telescopes that have "go to", that's not quite so important as it was.)

      Nevertheless, if you're going to eventualy get a telescope, start out by getting a planisphere and maybe a book on learning the constellations, and then promise "I'll get you a telescope as soon as you can go outside at night and identify fifteen constellations, and name fifteen bright stars."

      Oh, yes-- and if you live in a city, forget it completely. Buy a good pair of binoculars to look at the moon instead. (Which, actually, is also a lot of fun).

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    7. Re:Telescope by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 1

      Exactly right. Of course that doesn't necessarily mean it has to be expensive. A big (~10") Dobsonian like the one someone else mentioned is nice.

      Personally, what I have is a 5" newtonian, the Celestron AstroMaster 130EQ, $180 on Telescopes.com, that I really love, even though I have access to a massive 16" Meade monster for my job. Its small enough to carry easily, but big enough to give you pretty good views of planets, clusters, some of the brighter nebulae, and affordable even on a grad student's stipend. It won't show you as much as a big Dobsonian, but its on a manual equatorial mount, so its a lot better for learning how to find your way around the sky. Also, you can expand it to use the RA motor drive ($40) and a CCD to do astronomical imaging (either use a DSLR or some $300 passively cooled CCDs) -- not as accessible to beginners, but potentially more rewarding in the long run.

      Definitely go with a manual mount though, theres something rewarding about finding what you're looking for yourself over just punching things into a keypad. Its cheaper too, so you can get more aperture for the money.

    8. Re:Telescope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get the magic of the stars, planets and moon, as well as the fun of optics.

      http://www.snpp.com/episodes/2F11.html

      Skinner: Now, this morning we're going to be mapping a small square of sky that's thought to be empty. It's my hope that it's not.

      Bart: So what am I supposed to do exactly?

      Skinner: Just write down my findings as I give them to you. Six hours nineteen minutes right ascension, fourteen degrees twenty-two minutes declination: no sighting.

      Bart: [bored] Mm hmm.

      Skinner: Six hours nineteen minutes right ascension, fourteen degrees twenty-three minutes declination: no sighting.

      Bart: Mm hmm.

      [later]

      Skinner: Six hours nineteen minutes right ascension, fourteen degrees fifty-eight minutes declination: no sighting.

    9. Re:Telescope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the only problem is the cheap drugstore/costco/walmart ones are terrible, and often suck so much they put people off of astronomy.

    10. Re:Telescope by drainbramage · · Score: 1

      I picked up a couple of Meade telescopes over the last few years.
      They have all kinds of self guiding ones available, cameras, etc.
      I've been tempted to pick up one of the Solar telescopes.
      Prices from very affordable to holy cow.
      No association, just a fan.

      --
      No brain, no pain.
    11. Re:Telescope by Nathrael · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This post being modded Insightful instead of Funny can teach us a *lot* about Slashdot users :P .

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
    12. Re:Telescope by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      I like the idea of a telescope, but there are some caveats.

      Off the top, I'd tend to recommend it for kids that are a bit older than the seven- to nine-year-olds in the original question. Much of astronomy requires a certain amount of patience - waiting for your eyes to get dark adapted, learning the locations of stars and constellations, finding objects to look at, using Heavens Above, etc.

      I'll echo what some others have already pointed out -- a cheap plastic Wal-Mart MAGNIFIES STARS TWO THOUSAND TIMES!!! special is a recipe for frustration and heartache. What matters is aperture (diameter of the main lens or mirrors - the amount of light you collect goes up with the square of the diameter) and quality optics. A crappy mount or tripod means images that jiggle and difficult pointing.

      Another point to bear in mind is that (in much of the northern hemisphere mid-latitudes, at least) you're going to be in the dead of winter. It's going to be cold, overcast, and wet or snowy for much of the next few months. Consider the challenges of manipulating telescope components and assembling tripods while wearing gloves. If you do give a telescope to a loved one, do be considerate of their personal comfort. Freeze the kids once and you may snuff out any further interest in astronomical observation.

      Finally, consider that a telescope may not need to be the first thing on the list. A smaller spotting scope, monocular, or pair of binoculars can introduce a lot of astronomical sights, and often offer good-quality optics and rugged construction at much more reasonable prices. The surface of the moon is fascinating even with a low-powered scope, and any good pair of binoculars will reveal the Galilean moons of Jupiter. Binoculars and small spotting scopes can often be mounted on a conventional camera tripod or even be hand-held; this makes it much easier to pick them up and go outside on a whim. They're also useful for watching everything from wildlife to baseball games -- meaning that even if you don't manage to kindle interest in astronomy, the gift still can still be put to good use. ~~~~

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    13. Re:Telescope by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Or if you're not sure, an inexpensive but quite usable one like the Celestron dobsonian FirstScope:

      http://www.celestron.com/c3/product.php?ProdID=568

      It's cheap enough for me to get one for my nephew for xmas and I don't have to worry that he might not use it.

    14. Re:Telescope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hot neighbor = binoculars

      Hot neighbor 8 doors down = telescope

    15. Re:Telescope by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

      I second what you wrote. To the original author: You'll need to have your expectations in order when you buy a telescope. And stay far, far away from the Chinese junk; it's borderline worthless. Some tips are below. First, your viewing expectations:

      Binoculars (~$100):
      * Moon: Great. Almost like in books or photographs.
      * Planets: Points of light. You will probably see the Galilean moons around Jupiter. You probably won't see Saturn's rings, but you might.
      * Galaxies and globular clusters: The brightest galaxies and globular clusters will look like fuzzy blurs on the starfield.
      * Open clusters: The brightest open clusters, such as the Pleiades, will have a number of stars visible within. Don't expect much from others.
      * Nebulae: Don't expect to see any but the brightest of them, and expect those to be in black and white, with no real detail of relevance.

      Low-end, 4-6" telescope (~$350):
      * Moon: Wonderful. Better than books and photographs.
      * Planets: Points of light. You will see the Galilean moons around Jupiter. If you're *very* lucky, you might see cloud bands. You will likely see Saturn's rings, but no real detail. You can get enhanced planet detail by stacking photographs (you'll need a webcam or DSLR and an appropriate mount)
      * Galaxies and globular clusters: The brightest galaxies and globular clusters will look like fuzzy blurs on the starfield. You can get greater detail if you hook up a camera and do long exposures (with tracking) or stacking of photos. You'll need a webcam or DSLR and an appropriate mount for this.
      * Open clusters: Like binoculars, but more stars.
      * Nebulae: Don't expect to see any but the brightest of them, and expect those to be in black and white, with relatively little detail. Color and detail can be greatly enhanced by long exposures (with tracking) or stacking of photos. You'll need a webcam or DSLR and an appropriate mount for this.

      High-end, 8-12" telescope (~$1000 or more). Assuming good viewing conditions:
      * Moon: Wonderful. Better than books and photographs.
      * Planets: Mercury and Venus are points of light. You might make out Mars' polar ice caps. You will see the Galilean moons around Jupiter, as well as cloud bands. You will see Saturn's rings, and perhaps some detail on them. Uranus and Neptune are dim points of light. Greater detail can come from stacking of images (you'll need a webcam or DSLR and an appropriate mount)
      * Galaxies and globular clusters: The brightest galaxies and globular clusters will *still* look like fuzzy blurs on the starfield, although on some globular clusters, you may see some individual stars. You can get much greater detail if you hook up a camera and do long exposures (with tracking) or stacking of photos. You'll need a webcam or DSLR and an appropriate mount for this.
      * Open clusters: Like a smaller telescope, but even more stars.
      * Nebulae: Only expect to see those that are at least fairly bright, and expect those to be in black and white, with relatively little detail. Color and detail can be dramatically enhanced by long exposures (with tracking) or stacking of photos. You'll need a webcam or DSLR and an appropriate mount for this.

      In short: No matter what you get, as far as consumer products go, the moon is great, while planets, galaxies, globular clusters, open clusters, and nebulae are generally disappointing unless you do long exposures and/or stacking to enhance them. But going with a better scope with a bigger aperture will let you see more detail with your bare eyes.

      General tips:
      * You may not even have given this a second thought, but think strongly about the physical size of what you buy. A pair of binoculars is a nothing task to grab and toss into the car to head out of town and go stargazing. A 50lb, 8-foot long Newtonian? Not so much. A big, heavy object will discourage you from using it. If

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
    16. Re:Telescope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Galileoscope is a low-cost telescope. Anyone who calls it high-quality has never seen one in person. Yes,I bought two of them and assembled both with my son. If you can't afford more (as in the developing world, which is what it was intended for), it's adequate, but no more than that. You would do (a lot) better to buy a pair of binoculars from Wal-Mart. Don't underestimate what you can see with binocs, or even with naked eye at a dark site. A telescope is useless without a tripod mount, and due to stupid design errors, a Galileoscope can't be mounted to a standard tripod. It has the right thread, but it's too deep. Nor is it easy at all to focus (you can't sell a $15-$20 telescope with worm gears, I guess).

    17. Re:Telescope by Rei · · Score: 1

      One thing worth considering about autotrackers that don't have a GPS is that you have to know a whole slew of bright starts to be able to reliably align them. "Center telescope on Deneb.... Center telescope on Alkaid...." etc. It's only if your scope contains a GPS that you don't have to know the night sky.

      Also, objects moving out of view with a manual scope is rather annoying, IMHO, especially if you're trying to show something to someone else.

      On the other hand, setting up a scope to track can take some time, so if you're only planning to be out for a few minutes, it's usually not worth the time for autotracking.

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
    18. Re:Telescope by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 1

      In my experience even the ones with GPS require you to still know a bit -- the whole align by centering on the bright star thing never works as well as you'd like, at least in my experience. Magnetic anomalies, mount misalignments, or whatever else sometimes leave me wondering what star it is in the first place... this is particularly frustrating because Meade Autostar doesn't actually tell you what star it is you're looking for. My experience with the Meade 16" I work with has made me a little jaded on GOTO systems.

      As far as dealing with sidereal tracking, while annoying, its not as bad on a manual equatorial mount as on an Alt-Az, because you can simply tell them to use the RA knob to keep it in view. On something with as wide a field of view as a 5" or 6" f/5 like the one I pointed out, the movement isn't too fast. This is more likely to be a bigger problem on big Dobsonian. Also, you can get a RA drive for that particular Celestron, which helps the issue.

      I guess really in the end it comes down to a combination of factors -- budget, knowledgability of the parent, what you're hoping to see, patience of the kids, whether you expect to expand to more complex things like astrophotography, etc. etc.

    19. Re:Telescope by uassholes · · Score: 1

      I have one. For $20 it's excellent. Not much light gathering power, but the eyepiece comes close to my better ones. Good for the moon, and I can see a cloud band on Jupiter with the Barlow. Yes, a quality focuser would be nice to have but the thing is 20 dollars.
      For my four year old it's fine.

    20. Re:Telescope by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      Not just /.ers.

      I live in an area with a lot of lakes on top of each other. Lots of primary and second homes on the lakes. Over the years I've been in hundreds of these homes for work. It is amazing how many telescopes there are. Oddly most of them are pointing across the lake towards a pier or house window instead of towards the sky. I've looked through enough of them to find that they're focused very nicely on piers, windows and sunbathers.

      And I'll note that a freckle on the inner thigh can look mighty big!

    21. Re:Telescope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And this post being modded Insightful instead of Funny shows us they are not ashamed.

    22. Re:Telescope by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      I got an 8" reflecting telescope for $350 Canadian, and that's when our dollar was worth closer to $0.80 USD. Surely you can get one of this size for well less than $1000. That is, unless you buy one from a department store. You need to go to a specialty or online store if you don't want to be fleeced.

    23. Re:Telescope by myrrdyn · · Score: 1

      Venus as point of light with a 8" telescope ??? I can see Venus phases without problems using my 4.5" newtonian telescope.

      --
      Elen sìla lùmenn' omentielvo
    24. Re:Telescope by Rei · · Score: 1

      By that I meant that you won't see any cloud detail. Yes, you can see phases even with binoculars sometimes.

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
    25. Re:Telescope by Rei · · Score: 1

      Perhaps a 8" piece of Chinese junk for $350, but not a quality scope that will actually let you make use of the full resolution you'd normally be able to get from a 8". Heck, even reasonably good eyepieces alone cost $30-$60 each, and you'd want at least three or so.

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
    26. Re:Telescope by mlush · · Score: 1

      Thats pretty good guide I'd just add that there are some quality budget scopes out there. Celestron firstscope ($100) and the Galileoscope($20 though this excludes the tripod)

      That said if I were buying for a young astronomer I'd get them binoculars. Because a) there compact and generate little bedroom clutter and b) they can be used for Terrestrial observation ;-)

    27. Re:Telescope by smchris · · Score: 1

      In the process of reading the Backyard Astronomer's Guide, which I've been led to believe is a recognized beginner's bible. They address that in a panel: "What's the best telescope for my child...Don't buy a telescope at all." and "If they can't point to Saturn, how will they aim a telescope at it?"

      In other words, successful use of a telescope not only requires that the telescope be good quality but that the user is in the process of acquiring a body of knowledge that is rather steep for a child unless they are a savant already motivated in the area. They are also unlikely to have realistic expectations. Photographs will have led them to believe that planets should look _much_ larger and nebula shouldn't just be black and white.

      Sky charts and good binoculars could be an opportunity for family time building a foundation for learning the sky. Good binoculars, particularly coupled with a tripod, will discern the Galilean moons and a fair number of deep sky objects. They recommend that a person could pick up a pair of Celestron Outland 8x42 binoculars for as little as $100.

  3. Try sparkfun.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    they have some cool kits.

    1. Re:Try sparkfun.com by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Second this. I'm an older guy and getting back into dinking with electronics by playing with sparkfun stuff. My first kit should be at home when I get there. Can't wait :)

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    2. Re:Try sparkfun.com by drainbramage · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I read that as "drinking with electronics".
      Nothing better than blackjack and diodes.

      --
      No brain, no pain.
    3. Re:Try sparkfun.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're also having that $100 giveaway soon. A bit late for the holidays, but put January 7th on the calendar! http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/news.php?id=305

  4. Get 'Em a Dead Cat in a Box by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe they'll grow up to be Quantum Physicists.

    ...or really, really disturbed...

    1. Re:Get 'Em a Dead Cat in a Box by zygotic+mitosis · · Score: 1

      The point is that a live cat is put into the box...

    2. Re:Get 'Em a Dead Cat in a Box by jank1887 · · Score: 1

      I fail to understand your usage of the word 'or' in that context.

    3. Re:Get 'Em a Dead Cat in a Box by tool462 · · Score: 1

      And to be clear, that does NOT have to be an exclusive or.

    4. Re:Get 'Em a Dead Cat in a Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...entrapped in a mechanism created by the killer from "Saw" that kills the cat once they open the box.

    5. Re:Get 'Em a Dead Cat in a Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would that not be an (un)dead cat in a box?

    6. Re:Get 'Em a Dead Cat in a Box by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they'll grow up to be Quantum Physicists. ...or really, really disturbed...

      You say that like they are mutually-exclusive.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    7. Re:Get 'Em a Dead Cat in a Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or both... (from experience)

    8. Re:Get 'Em a Dead Cat in a Box by ihaveamo · · Score: 1

      I think you are missing the poin, they will be Quantum Physicists AND really disturbed, AT THE SAME TIME!

  5. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  6. Lots of things by spribyl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Try

    Think Geek
    American Science and surplus.
    HobbyTron(Ramsey)

    Some gifts
    Lego
          Mind Storms.
        Any thing with gears and wheels.
    Lincoln logs
    Erector Sets

    1. Re:Lots of things by v1 · · Score: 1

      while browsing for those links I also found Exploratorium (Perplexus looks good)

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:Lots of things by jank1887 · · Score: 1

      Tinker Toys. Nothing beats the How a Differential Gear works youtube video, demonstrated with Tinker Toys. 'http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4JhruinbWc

      Just remember, while the kids can play with science, they can learn to do things with engineering. teach them to play with making things work.

    3. Re:Lots of things by dnahelicase · · Score: 1

      get a spykee robot (erector set) if you can get one on woot.com for a 100 bucks. It's complicated, fun, and works if they just want to put something electronic/multimedia/fun together... and then if they get interested they can program it

    4. Re:Lots of things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lincoln logs were great... when I was 5. I liked them after that, but I don't think I'd be too thrilled with getting them as a gift.

    5. Re:Lots of things by netruner · · Score: 1

      If they're into chemistry - you can try looking at the local homebrew store - they usually have a kit for making root beer or something like that.

      --



      DISCLAIMER: This post was not checked for speling and grammar- if you complain- you're a whiner
    6. Re:Lots of things by snappyjack · · Score: 1

      You can't beat Lego Technics in terms of structural toys. They have, in my opinion, the very best 'complexity of what I can build/how hard they are to use' ratio there is, which seems like exactly what your kids want. My roommate just used them for his final project in a grad-level dynamics course to build one of these (not full-size, of course): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=par9zbTSN58

    7. Re:Lots of things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kit for making root beer:

      1) squeeze commercial fountain drink syrup into dispensing container
      2) dilute with water to correct ratio
      3) connect CO2 cylinder

    8. Re:Lots of things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Science fiction for kids -- books by Robert Heinlein, for example.

    9. Re:Lots of things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sad but true.

    10. Re:Lots of things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly that's not too far off. Most root beer "recipes" aren't much more than buy extract, toss in water, sugar, and some kind of ale yeast. Wait. Compared to hobbyist beer making, it sucks.

    11. Re:Lots of things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A nuke from space tis the only way to be sure.

    12. Re:Lots of things by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      Thx for the link, that was really cool.

    13. Re:Lots of things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Burma Shave.

  7. This is a dangerous question here by jimbobborg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'd suggest some large caliber firearms, but I don't think you'll go for that. How about a real chemistry set? Add some extras that don't come with the kit. Or an electronics kit. Or do they still make those? Bah, just buy them guns. They'll be better off when the zombies come.

  8. A few are good... by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 3, Informative

    legos are good for modular design, infinite re-use--but you might stay away from the technical or specialty sets, as they tend to be more problematic and less re-usable; capsuela is good for basic gears and so on, and modularity; We also played with BASIC a bit at that age, IIRC. Oh, and Rocky's boots. You must get rocky's boots. Digital Logic for kids.

    Some of these may have modern equivalents...

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    1. Re:A few are good... by tepples · · Score: 1

      Oh, and Rocky's boots. You must get rocky's boots. Digital Logic for kids.

      That's available only for long-outdated platforms. You might have a better chance of getting Widget Workshop or KLogic running.

    2. Re:A few are good... by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      legos ... stay away from the technical ... sets, as they tend to be more problematic and less re-usable;

      Nonsense. The Technic range is mostly standard parts, plus a few specialty parts in each kit. They're fantastically reusable, only limited by the kid's imagination and (for larger creations) your budget.

  9. Bacteria kit by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

    Think Geek has a bacteria science kit that I thought looked fun. More for the >12 group. Particularly good if you are trying to get them to wash up more.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Bacteria kit by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      Alternatively some yeast cultures and growth medium (and hops). You will have to dispose of the used growth medium yourself. ;)

    2. Re:Bacteria kit by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      Most teenagers already have bacteria kits -- their bedrooms.

  10. Kid's love uranium! by ZuchinniOne · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can buy it here

    You could help them build a processing plant to purify it and then eventually have your own little nuclear reactor. All the other kids in the neighborhood will be soooo jealous!

    1. Re:Kid's love uranium! by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      All the other kids in the neighborhood will be soooo jealous!

      And Irradiated!

    2. Re:Kid's love uranium! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True dat! That gift's the bomb!

    3. Re:Kid's love uranium! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That plus the year's supply of fertilizer bought for the wife's garden will make for the best Christmas ever!

    4. Re:Kid's love uranium! by Temujin_12 · · Score: 1

      You can buy it here

      You could help them build a processing plant to purify it and then eventually have your own little nuclear reactor. All the other kids in the neighborhood will be soooo jealous!

      I'd first check with your neighborhood's nuclear proliferation by-laws. Buying uranium may risk sanctions from the other neighborhood kids who already have uranium. Your kids will no longer be able to play or share toys with the other kids in the neighborhood and will be ostracized.

      --
      Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
    5. Re:Kid's love uranium! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i hear that's how Iran got started

    6. Re:Kid's love uranium! by ddxexex · · Score: 0

      I find it interesting that they're already sold out on all but the medium radiation level ore. I wonder if any /.ers are going to have a radiating glow on their face when they open up their presents this christmas...

    7. Re:Kid's love uranium! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A call has been placed. Expect a visit from DHS sometime soon.

    8. Re:Kid's love uranium! by antirelic · · Score: 1

      I know! I know!

      For Christmas, we can give our kids the source code to the climate models that the UN and various other global entities use to predict "global warming".

      Also, if there is any good will left after releasing the source code, perhaps you can all release "ALL" the "RAW" data from all sensors and perhaps the hard drives where data was "dumped" so we can recover data forensically.

      Merry Christmas!

      --
      20th century Marxism is not progress...
    9. Re:Kid's love uranium! by angrytuna · · Score: 1

      Looks like he had better hurry. All the high radiation level stuff is already sold out.
      ...
      Am I the only one who's a little disturbed by that?

      --

      It is a solemn thought: dead, the noblest man's meat is inferior to pork.

    10. Re:Kid's love uranium! by 3dr · · Score: 1

      Yes, they'll be glowing green with envy.

  11. Growing up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I was always a fan of the sciences. I remember my first science experiment kit, complete with book showing how to set up various experiments and explaining why they were important.

    But the one thing I always wanted was a telescope. What is more cool than observing the heavens? And kids don't necessarily need to look at stars when we have the moon right there for easy observations. Not to mention, its a tool that everyone can use together... think of it as another thing to use on a family night!

    1. Re:Growing up... by jimbobborg · · Score: 0, Troll

      Especially for watching the hot neighbor undress. Real family fun there!

    2. Re:Growing up... by rwa2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't just go out and get a telescope without a good book to go with it.

      I've been using one of David Levy's books with my kids... something similar to:
      David Levy's Guide to the Night Sky
      that I found in the bargain bin some time ago. It has great introduction and background, plus points of interest to look for in every constellation. Much better than the rudimentary charts that come packaged with most telescopes.

      Also, it recommends first starting with a good pair of binoculars before moving on to telescopes. Which are also more practical for virtually any other kind of natural sciences pursuit as well.

    3. Re:Growing up... by beernutmark · · Score: 1

      Although we already have them, two of the coolest astronomy books for kids are by H.A. Rey. (Wrote Curious George with his wife Margret). The Stars and Find the Constellations.

    4. Re:Growing up... by DieByWire · · Score: 1

      Don't just go out and get a telescope without a good book to go with it. I've been using one of David Levy's books with my kids... something similar to: David Levy's Guide to the Night Sky

      Chet Raymo's "365 Starry Nights" is another great choice.

      --
      Never shake hands with a man you meet in a fertility clinic.
    5. Re:Growing up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a continuation of this thought, anything without some possibility of sustained interest is not worth it.

      My parents gave me all the generic "sciencey kid gifts" when I was younger - microscope, telescope, circuitry kit - but I never played with them to any extent because I couldn't DO anything with them. A microscope is worthless without something to study or a good way of learning how to use it (this is where the books come in.)

      The best christmas present I ever got was actually picked out of the trash on christmas day. We got a new computer, and the old one was going to be thrown away, but I asked my parents if I could take it and play with it instead. That was something where I could get the satisfaction of making it work. I never really did anything with it besides tinker around and play with DOS/Windows 3.1, but that's all I wanted to do.

      My suggestion would be to find an old computer (486, Pentium, etc, a laptop would be more fun too) and give it to your kids to be *their* computer, and let them open it up and figure it out and learn how to fit the monitor plug into the video card the right way. They can't hurt it, so let them have the joy of finding the BIOS settings and playing around. Suggestions of DR-DOS or Linux maybe, Commander Keen never gets old. And if it's a laptop, it also conveys a sense of adulthood. I know I took my old notebook around on vacations and would pop it out when my uncles and aunts were doing work on theirs; it made me feel like a very important ten-year-old.

    6. Re:Growing up... by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Also, do use this lovely resource, if you get a good 'scope.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    7. Re:Growing up... by lazyforker · · Score: 1

      There's an app for that: I bought Starmap for my iPhone - it's pretty good to start with. Shows constellations, planets and some other interesting things in the sky - and uses the GPS and clock to give a nice view of the sky. The 3GS version uses the compass to help orient yourself. A lot cheaper than a telescope, more portable, less setup, and therefore it's not a big deal if the child displays zero interest. Their eyes are also probably better than yours so they will see a lot more anyway. If they show any interest then maybe get a pair of binoculars - the massive improvement is also fairly low cost, portable, no setup, easy to use, multipurpose etc.

  12. Actually that's not his name by somersault · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd never heard of him, but apparently his name is actually "Neil deGrasse Tyson".

    And knowing the names of scientists is more to do with history than actual science.

    [/complaining]

    --
    which is totally what she said
    1. Re:Actually that's not his name by wizardforce · · Score: 1

      He's a fairly popular astrophysicist who makes fairly regular appearances on the History channel's "Universe" series and has been on the Colbert Report more than any other guest. He's also the director of the Hayden Planetarium and was one of the most vocal supporters of the position that Pluto should not be classified as a planet. He is also a member of the Commission on the Future of the United States Aerospace Industry

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    2. Re:Actually that's not his name by beernutmark · · Score: 1

      Yea, I left off the e in deGrasse in my initial submission. Whoops. Hopefully he will forgive.

      The reason the kids knew him was from watching Nova Science Now religiously. A great program that needs more episodes a year!

    3. Re:Actually that's not his name by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Insightful

      watching Nova Science Now religiously

      Now that's irony!

    4. Re:Actually that's not his name by Knara · · Score: 1

      He's essentially evolving slowly into the new Sagan, in a way. He is personable, funny and can boil complex scientific concepts down to street level. Pretty cool. The little bit where he wouldn't leave the Green Room on The Daily Show (or Conan O'Brien?) until he got done with his Rubik's Cube was hilarious.

    5. Re:Actually that's not his name by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      He's the host of Nova Science Now on PBS. Actually, I find him to be annoying and not that bright, but his appeal is that he is the perfect everyman, that is, someone that anyone can relate to regardless of gender or ethnicity. I doubt his abilities to do real science, but he makes a good spokesman.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    6. Re:Actually that's not his name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the point is that he's a present-day educator and advocate for science , not that he's a historically important figure.

    7. Re:Actually that's not his name by NotPeteMcCabe · · Score: 1

      As a teacher I have to disagree: knowing the names of scientists is for many students the first step towards engaging with the subject. Remember the heirarchy of things people are interested in: 1) themselves 2) other people 3) things.

    8. Re:Actually that's not his name by somersault · · Score: 1

      Sadly I often find "things" more interesting than other people.. but I won't pretend that I'm the gold standard for a well adjusted human being.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    9. Re:Actually that's not his name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carl Sagan tried to recruit him to attend Cornell... he eventually got his Ph.D. in astrophysics from Columbia. Among other accomplishments I'm betting he's a decent scientist.

  13. I had a much cruder version of this 30 years ago: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  14. Give US some hints, dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just the word "science" is very very broad. If you want actual usable suggestion, I suggest you let us know what areas of science your kids actually like? Plants (botony)? Stars (astronomy)? Meth-labs (chemistry)? etc ... get the point?

  15. Some ideas by fliptout · · Score: 3, Informative

    A crystal radio kit. A Radio Shack 101 experiments in one. A basic Stamp kit. Mindstorms. A chemistry set. Magnets. Rocket kit.

    Even something more technical that a parent or grandparent would enjoy doing as a project together with the kid. I've got fond memories of designing circuits with my father, building things with my grandfather, etc.

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    1. Re:Some ideas by ikedasquid · · Score: 1

      I had a Radio Shack 60 in 1 when I was 10. That thing changed my life! I literally played with it every day for years. Anecdotal evidence warning: I'm a electrical eng now. I don't think they are as straightforward now as they were back in the early 90s, regardless I have a 5 year old niece that will get one when she turns 9. Anyhow if you do go that route, RS also has a cheap book about basic electricity and electronics that is great for kids - the author's name is F. Mimms. It looks hand-written but it's super simple and has some circuits in it WITH explanations of how they work. Also, science picture encyclopedias are pretty inexpensive.

    2. Re:Some ideas by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I had the 50-in-one kit back in the long ago. It had explanations of the circuits. I remember the manual saying something about forward biassing the transistor, or some such thing. I was too young to understand at the time, and my attention was drawn away to the 75-in-one kit I got later, and the 200-in-one which followed that one. Now that I want to get back into electronics, I dug up the manuals for the kits. Sadly, as time went on, the explanations of how the circuits worked got dumbed down. I can't find the manual for the old 50-in-one kit.
      br> The Mimms books are good, but books by themselves aren't as good as a really good kit. Maybe if you coupled the Mimms book with the parts needed to actually do the circuits. Hmmm...

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:Some ideas by Xacid · · Score: 1

      Stamps!?

    4. Re:Some ideas by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      I also had the same kits, and I'm also an EE.

      OMGWTF correlation. (Yes, I know that p is two)

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  16. Makershed Kit by odin84gk · · Score: 4, Informative

    Chemistry Kits:
    http://www.makershed.com/SearchResults.asp?Cat=89

    Electronics Kits
    http://www.makershed.com/SearchResults.asp?Cat=49

    Sorry to make it look like spam, but I'm a fan of the "Make" site.

    1. Re:Makershed Kit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll second the recommendation for Maker Shed. Their Science Room section has a lot of stuff suitable for pre-teens. My first recommendation would be either a good quality basic microscope set and/or one of the excellent Thames & Kosmos chemistry sets.

      Binoculars or a telescope are also good ideas. Orion Telescope and Binocular carries a good range of both at decent prices.

    2. Re:Makershed Kit by wsuverkropp · · Score: 1

      The MAKE people have lots of cool, real science kits. Biology, chemistry kits, electronics....Highly recommended.

    3. Re:Makershed Kit by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      Holy cats! Those chemical kits ("Core Chemicals Bundle" and "Supplemental Chemicals Kit") are incredible. You'd spend many, many times more trying to order them piecemeal from one of the few dealers who'll still sell to individuals. And a lot of the other prices make me feel like I'm looking at a science catalog from my adolescence, back when science kit was at least borderline affordable.

      Thanks for the link!

  17. Electronics Set by emandres · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This isn't exactly astronomy related like Niel deGrass Tyson's stuff, but when I was a kid I got an electronics set, complete with a bread-board, several LED's, a rheostat, heaps and heaps of resistors and capacitors, and several other things having to do with digital and analog circuitry. That was one of the best Christmas presents I ever got, and still from time to time wish I had it to pull out and tinker with. I remember one time I probably could have burned the house down had I not smelled the melting plastic on the set. What happened was that I had learned at school how to make an electromagnet out of a battery, a coil of wire, and a nail. Well, I did the same thing with the set when I got home, but then left it on for about an hour. As you well may know, connecting the two terminals of a battery without any resistor can cause the batteries to overheat, and most likely rupture. I think I probably caught the thing just before the batteries broke, because they were very hot. Anyway, I'm rambling, but you get the idea: I learned to love tinkering with electronics as a kid, and now am majoring in Computer Science.

    --
    The only way to tell the difference between a hamster and a gerbil is that the hamster has more white meat.
    1. Re:Electronics Set by Again · · Score: 1

      This isn't exactly astronomy related like Niel deGrass Tyson's stuff, but when I was a kid I got an electronics set, complete with a bread-board, several LED's, a rheostat, heaps and heaps of resistors and capacitors, and several other things having to do with digital and analog circuitry. That was one of the best Christmas presents I ever got, and still from time to time wish I had it to pull out and tinker with. I remember one time I probably could have burned the house down had I not smelled the melting plastic on the set. What happened was that I had learned at school how to make an electromagnet out of a battery, a coil of wire, and a nail. Well, I did the same thing with the set when I got home, but then left it on for about an hour. As you well may know, connecting the two terminals of a battery without any resistor can cause the batteries to overheat, and most likely rupture. I think I probably caught the thing just before the batteries broke, because they were very hot. Anyway, I'm rambling, but you get the idea: I learned to love tinkering with electronics as a kid, and now am majoring in Computer Science.

      So that's what happened. I exploded a battery when I was a kid. Luckily no fire started and I wasn't in the room so I was safe. Of course, that battery that exploded was just a small watch battery but it made a pretty loud sound considering.

    2. Re:Electronics Set by Zerth · · Score: 1

      You think that's bad, when I was a kid I ran out of wire and mistook some solid-core solder for wire when doing the same thing.

      Fortunately, my dad asked my why on earth I was wrapping solder around a nail before I hooked up the terminals, so I didn't get my first nasty solder burn until a few years later.

  18. newtons laws are still good for practical purposes by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    Get one of them a pan balance. learn about mass, density, gravity. Compare quantities of things. I'll bet it gets a fair amount of use.

    --
    Nullius in verba
  19. buy them a bunch of smoke detectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    and challenge them to make a working breeder reactor. I hear they do that sort of thing in the boy scouts.

  20. Rubber vagina and a dildo by middlemen · · Score: 1, Funny

    Teaching the reproductive system is one of the most enjoyable experiences not to forget learning experiences. I know I enjoyed learning about the vagina and what my penis could do. ;)

    1. Re:Rubber vagina and a dildo by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

      "Kids, I want you to be nice on the remainder of the trip to grandmas. And quit comparing your father's penis to your disturbingly large purple dildo".

    2. Re:Rubber vagina and a dildo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barney toys aren't what they used to be.

  21. Telescope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Galileoscope is a high-quality, low-cost telescope kit developed for the International Year of Astronomy 2009 by a team of leading astronomers, optical engineers, and science educators. No matter where you live, with this easy-to-assemble, 50-mm (2-inch) diameter, 25- to 50-power achromatic refractor, you can see the celestial wonders that Galileo Galilei first glimpsed 400 years ago

    priced at U.S. $20 each plus shipping

    https://www.galileoscope.org/

  22. knowledge = danger by TheMeuge · · Score: 1

    Didn't you know, you can't have a real chemistry set anymore. Only terrorists would want to buy them. Are you trying to raise terrorists?

    If you give them electronics, you're obviously trying to raise evil hackers.

    If you give them a popular science biology book and some fruit flies to play with, obviously you're equipping them for making biological weapons.

    Instead, you should get them a Nintendo and sit them in front of the TV like the good little sheep they should become.

    1. Re:knowledge = danger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll have to show your post to my wife. She thinks I'm delusional because I feel the same way you do.
      How are kids supposed to get interested in science if they have to wait until college to do
      anything remotely interesting? We've come a long way from the days when Oliver Sacks was a kid (Uncle Tungsten: Memories of a Chemical Boyhood).

    2. Re:knowledge = danger by Aeros · · Score: 1

      dont they have an electronics or chemistry video game that kids can play with? That way they get all the benefit of playing video games without having to get actual hands on time with the product! That way if they blow something up or electrocute themselves they get a new player.

  23. Science toys/projects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  24. After the Microscope and Rock Kit... by jqweezy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Get them self defense classes.

    1. Re:After the Microscope and Rock Kit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Get them self defense classes."

      Just what they want, two hours a week where the bigger kids are PRAISED for beating them up.

  25. For Physics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A chronometer (stopwatch), Rangefinder (meter stick), and mass balance (scale) can help you do practically any laboratory for Newtonian Physics.

    1. Re:For Physics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A kid could save up their allowance and get the watch or the meter stick, but a decent scale is Mom and Dad money. However, shelling out for a decent scale enables chemistry fun as well.

    2. Re:For Physics... by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      My local kitchen store sells a digital scale with 1-gram resolution and 5kg (!) capacity for US$30, and several places will sell you a digital scale with 0.01g resolution and 200g capacity for around the same price. (I was very surprised and pleased to find this out.)

  26. Snap Circuits by CognitiveFusion · · Score: 5, Informative

    Snap Circuit Kits make good introductions to electronics. Think circuitry LEGOs.

    http://www.elenco.com/snapcircuits.html

    --
    Fools ignore complexity; pragmatists suffer it; experts avoid it; geniuses remove it. ~A. Perlis
    1. Re:Snap Circuits by CambodiaSam · · Score: 4, Informative

      Completely Agree. My son has a set and loves it. It's far superior to the Radio Shack 200-in-1 kit that I had as a kid. Those used wires and springs, and were a total pain. This new set is a heck of a lot easier and just as entertaining.

    2. Re:Snap Circuits by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Maybe. I remember my Radio Shack kit. When I got the AM radio to work, that was pure childhood magic. Eventually I cannibalized the kit for parts to build my own things.

  27. Get them a box with no cat by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe they'll grow up to be Quantum Physicists.

    Goddammit, the deadness of a dead cat can be determined classically. Like with a stick, say.

    Way to kill the kids' dreams.

    Actually, the way physics has gotten so fucking esoteric, Schrodinger's cat is passe. What you do is get them a box with no cat in it. Then they can argue about whether there is a parallel box in the next county that does have a cat in it, or whether there is currently a dark, unobservable cat in the box. Or whether there is actually a box at all, or if we've invented the whole thing.

    Before you know it, they'll come up with something so dumb they'll be offered tenure.

    1. Re:Get them a box with no cat by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Before you know it, they'll come up with something so dumb they'll be offered tenure.

      That the cat is a lie?

    2. Re:Get them a box with no cat by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Or you could speculate on what kind of cat you'd get from the quantum froth if you chopped the box in half with a black hole.

      If you got the anti-cat of the virtual pair, would you call it a dog?

    3. Re:Get them a box with no cat by frogzilla · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of interesting physics that isn't particle whacking.

    4. Re:Get them a box with no cat by KnownIssues · · Score: 1

      Or get them a box for their Sim and watch the Sim wonder if there's a creator who put the box there.

    5. Re:Get them a box with no cat by ascari · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cat in box is sooo last paradigm. I'd say give them a dog in a box. Then they go "WTF?" and that's how all real important science begins with a complete break with tradition.

    6. Re:Get them a box with no cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noooooooo!!!!
      What if they take the "dark-side" approach and then start
      arguing in favor of a religious explanation for the
      absence of a cat? I think you are playing with fire here.

  28. Nintendo = danger by tepples · · Score: 1

    Instead, you should get them a Nintendo and sit them in front of the TV like the good little sheep they should become.

    Get them a Nintendo console and you may turn them into copyright infringers. Eventually, they'll want to cheat at the games, which leads to homebrew, which (in the console makers' opinion) leads to piracy.

    1. Re:Nintendo = danger by jimbobborg · · Score: 1

      So it seems firearms are a safer bet? Hey, they can learn physics and chemistry at the same time!

    2. Re:Nintendo = danger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention biology when things go awry!

    3. Re:Nintendo = danger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, if they're lucky, basic first aid, too!

    4. Re:Nintendo = danger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And one day they may want to try installing openBSD, and all hope of their future will be lost.

    5. Re:Nintendo = danger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And according to Fox News, playing with hand guns teaches your kids about the Constitution and a respect for the founding fathers.

    6. Re:Nintendo = danger by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      You mean natural selection?

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    7. Re:Nintendo = danger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to Fox News, Sarah Palin is fit to hold the office of President.

    8. Re:Nintendo = danger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theo, is that you?

  29. Do they still make those "electronic project kits" by Knara · · Score: 1

    Because I had one of those Radio Shack 150-in-one project kits and I played with that for years. I can't claim that it helped me in my digital logic and system design class, but still...

  30. HST by jockeys · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've had good luck and good service from http://www.hometrainingtools.com/ Home Science Tools. I got presents for my nephews there this year, they have all sorts of fun kits and things, (including a very nice rockhound kit) and the prices seemed pretty competitive. Even ordering last week I got the stuff pretty quickly.

    Disclaimer: I am not affiliated in any way, just a satisfied customer.

    --

    In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    1. Re:HST by EricWright · · Score: 1

      Ooh, THAT HST... And here I thought you were suggesting he buy the Hubble Space Telescope for his kids.

      On second thought...

  31. My fav sciency gifts as a kid: by InsertWittyNameHere · · Score: 1

    Some of my favs, in no particular order:
    1) Chemistry set
    2) Electronics set
    3) Rocket kit (build and launch)
    4) RC Plane kit (build and fly)
    5) One really cool gift was a big kit with a toolbox, various wood, paint, and a book of all the different things you can build. Things like a wooden clock (it included the electronics part, you just built the face and painted it). A bird house.

    Check out http://scientificsonline.com/ for more ideas

  32. Mythbusters experiment sets by bpfinn · · Score: 1

    The Mythbusters exerpiment sets look like fun to me, but if your kids already know NdGT, the sets might be a little below their level.

  33. Help them get started with electronics+programming by compumike · · Score: 5, Informative

    Whatever you do, find something where there's real teaching and interactivity and creative thinking going on -- not just polishing some rocks or a step-by-step Lego project. And furthermore, interacting with your child while they're using whatever science gift you pick is also extremely valuable.

    Ages 7 and 9 may be a bit young... but we know that 11-year olds do well with getting introduced to electronics and programming, and the interaction that it offers with the physical world through various sensors and actuators. In our experience at NerdKits electronics kits, our youngest customers tend to learn the fastest, because they are the most fearless! They're able to try building something, get something wrong, but just keep working at it until they succeed. Our various free video tutorials help teach various electronics and programming concepts as well.

    Here's an 11-year-old's NerdKits "Kid Review" in Make Magazine, or a reading by the author of the review.

    Challenge them a bit -- with a bit of guidance, they're capable of taking on more than you might think!

  34. Smart Ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Give them what I'm giving my kids this year, a slide rule. They'l love it!

    1. Re:Smart Ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A slide rule is the poor man's Curta.

  35. American Science & Surplus by molo · · Score: 1
    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
  36. Look for simplicity by melansp · · Score: 1

    If you spent time explaining the history and mathematics behind certain concepts, something as simple as... - Wooden Tower of Hanoi - Rubik's Cube - Pegopolis - Sudoku, Kakuro, ... puzzle books

  37. Eyeclops bionic eye by nizo · · Score: 2, Informative

    A decent microscope that you plug into your TV. The kids have had theirs for a year and still play with it all the time.

    1. Re:Eyeclops bionic eye by atomistic · · Score: 1

      Even better than TVs are computers! USB microscopes are pretty awesome, and laptops, unlike TVs, are portable. Plus, you can do more with the video once it's on a computer. Something like this: http://www.amazon.com/Digital-USB-Microscope-Video-Camera/dp/B0011E0IYW

    2. Re:Eyeclops bionic eye by NotPeteMcCabe · · Score: 1

      Second the recommendation of eyeclops. A great toy for kids and adults. The new version is even better than the one I have.

  38. Uh, ask them? by snarfies · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why are you asking Slashdot? Have you tried, like, asking THEM? I know you're nerds and all, but geez.

    1. Re:Uh, ask them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes kids don't really know what they want. Some of my favorite presents as a kid were things that I didn't ask for.

    2. Re:Uh, ask them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you asking Slashdot? Have you tried, like, asking THEM? I know you're nerds and all, but geez.

      No need to be rude. It's actually quite normal to ask people for advice on gift buying. And if you want to surprise the recipient, you do not ask them what they want. And if you're wanting to get a young child a science-themed gift, asking them may not be helpful. Young children may not even be aware yet of all the tools involved in science that they could receive as gifts. This is a great topic! Thanks for posting scuttlemonkey

  39. Re:Help them get started with electronics+programm by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

    Mod this up - I completely agree.

    Even if they are too young to grasp the idea of programming, getting them going with electric motors and such circuitry you find in various toys, (Lego Technic comes to mind) will go a long way in leading them down pretty useful skills in the future.

  40. Don't overthink this by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Swiss army knife
    Magnifying glass.
    Soldering iron.

    1. Re:Don't overthink this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Swiss army knife
      Magnifying glass.
      Soldering iron.

      duct tape -- for aspiring McGyvers everywhere.

    2. Re:Don't overthink this by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Except that Swiss army knives are RAZOR SHARP, at least when new and genuine. I got my first one at 9 and nearly removed the end of my finger. I'd wait until maybe 11 or 12 for that particular item. I understand Scouts hand them out at 8, but only after ritualistic training and prep. Perhaps a reasonably-sized lock-blade would be a better choice.

      I'm not trying to be an alarmist. All three of the items listed have dangers. Its only that the first takes nearly no effort to warrant a trip to the emergency room.

    3. Re:Don't overthink this by Xacid · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the rope! :) I had a blast "inventing" my own science as a kid. However, I did get into rockets in middle school so that was pretty slick. In elementary school I was more concerned about making friends and not getting yelled at by mom for not doing my homework. Just wait until high school, then those kids end of being focused on something *entirely* different. :p

    4. Re:Don't overthink this by iroll · · Score: 1

      THIS!
      I would add:
        - Cheap balsa gliders
        - Lego Technics!!
        - and a book like The American Boy's Handy Book--it'll get them into more of the "good kind" of trouble than any hundreds of dollars on toys.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    5. Re:Don't overthink this by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      That is an awesome book. I should have remembered that one.

    6. Re:Don't overthink this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First aid kit.

    7. Re:Don't overthink this by devotedlhasa · · Score: 1

      Razor blades
      Matches
      Gun Powder

    8. Re:Don't overthink this by gknoy · · Score: 1

      I agree. Single locking blade >>> Swiss Army Knife.

      The tools are fun but ultimately nearly useless. Your kid'll be using the knife blade MUCH more. The locking blade is also much safer -- I had my folding knife blade close on my finger once. There are many ways a knife is useful to a kid. (Cutting rope, duct-tape, branches ...)

      Of course, you have to make sure that your community is someplace that won't flip out about kids with knives, and also you have to (these days) instill the fear of Major Punishment if they bring a knife to school. *shudder*. I did that by accident several times in second and third grade, and while that may have been mostly harmless, it's now a gigantic can of Peril for all even tangentially involved.

      Everything in a Swiss Army knife is Less Useful than real tools:
      - scissors
      - pen
      - toothpick
      - pliers
      - saw ... all of those are tools that you likely already have available to them, and are tools which if they really need, are much less frustrating to use than the items in a Swiss Army knife.

    9. Re:Don't overthink this by Squidlips · · Score: 1

      Lead-free solder, of course!

    10. Re:Don't overthink this by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Except that Swiss army knives are RAZOR SHARP, at least when new and genuine. I got my first one at 9 and nearly removed the end of my finger.

      Any knife should be razor sharp, and not just when new. If it isn't, then either it's a crap blade or it has been poorly maintained. Either way, a dull knife is actually much more dangerous than a sharp one since you have to put so much more force behind it to make it cut.

      My sister and I both got Swiss Army knives at age 5. I don't recall having any serious incidents with mine, but my sister cut herself pretty good the first day she had hers. It healed though. I haven't exactly given my daughter a knife, but she appropriated the utility knife out of my tool box for her crafts at age 7.

      I'm not a big fan of the theory that kids should never get hurt. There are certain lessons that they need to learn, and yet lack the cognitive ability to do so without a certain amount of pain (physical or mental). Things like "fire is hot" and "knives are sharp" tend to go in one ear and out the other until they get burned or cut.

      With a little bit of supervision in those first few hours, I see no problem giving a knife to a kid that young. You may be right about a locking blade, though. I've had Swiss Army knives try to close on me before.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  41. Re:Do they still make those "electronic project ki by compumike · · Score: 1

    I too had one of those as a kid -- the ones where you follow the book to connect the various spring terminals! While I might be able to go back and learn some more from it now, I can't really say I learned much from it at the time. It was very much focused on just following the step-by-step directions, with little emphasis on creativity / customization / concepts. So after finishing my Masters in EECS from MIT, I decided to build my own electronics kits for the "digital generation", with a tremendous focus on creativity / customization / concepts. Check us out :-)

  42. You'll never know which by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until you look.

  43. Not plastic by goober · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't fall for anything made of plastic that says "Educational!" on the package. Science toys don't teach kids anything. Parents do! Look for something that you can do and learn together. Steer towards gifts that have wider applications, e.g. don't get a telescope, get binoculars! Don't get a microscope, get a hand magnifying glass! Don't get a nature DVD, get a bird book!

    1. Re:Not plastic by atomistic · · Score: 1

      Steer towards gifts that have wider applications, e.g. don't get a telescope, get binoculars! Don't get a microscope, get a hand magnifying glass! Don't get a nature DVD, get a bird book!

      I would tend to agree with avoiding "educational" products. However, getting a decent microscope, especially a USB one so you have your computer screen to look at instead of the tiny little eyepiece, is WAY cooler than a magnifying glass.

      If you want to assemble a portable "field science" kit, I definitely agree:

      Magnifying glass
      Binoculars
      A nice, bound, notebook with good pens
      A butterfly net
      Bird/insect identification book
      Star chart
      Good science coaching (that's where you come in)

    2. Re:Not plastic by Xacid · · Score: 1

      I always loved projects that gave me an excuse to learn stuff from my dad. These times were few and far between but worth every minute. I'd say that's more valuable than what any kit could offer. In other words - I like where you're going with this. :)

  44. EE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they're interested in electronics, those 120-in-1 kits that they used to sell at radio shack (and now sell at jameco and digikey) are invaluable.

  45. Too late by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

    Seriously you are asking this question after Thanksgiving?

    All the good stuff is sold out already.

  46. Re:Do they still make those "electronic project ki by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    They sure do, but they're much nicer now. My 9- and 8-year-old kids get the kit out, unprompted, to build stuff pretty often.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  47. Here Comes Science by Brett+Diamond · · Score: 2, Informative

    You should check out They Might Be Giants' newest album "Here Comes Science" (a CD/DVD combo, available at Amazon for $13).

  48. Re:newtons laws are still good for practical purpo by CodeHog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And if things don't work out in the science field, they can use it to weigh their drugs.

    --
    Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
  49. Great evolution-related toys by LawnBoy · · Score: 1
  50. Chemistry Set! by BobMcD · · Score: 1
  51. Basic Lab Glassware Set by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are some cheap and solid sets around to help them begin setting up their first chemistry lab. It should provide a lot of fun, and it will spare your kitchen from basic scientific shenanigans.

  52. The old 50 in 1 or 100 in 1 Electronics kit by lunchlady55 · · Score: 1

    It sparked my interest in all things electronic.

  53. microscope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A microscope is a good gift but be prepared to spend $250 to $300 for a real student model. When I was a kid I had a metal toy microscope that was made in Germany. It really worked but they don't make those any more. The plastic things sold in toy stores are junk. Plastic wiggles too much. Mine even came with a mechanical slide stage, a necessity if you want to chase Paramecium around the slide. One of those will cost $40.

  54. scitoys.com by e3m4n · · Score: 0

    http://scitoys.com/ lots of great activities and kits here

  55. Simple, Fun, Clean by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    A 7 year old should enjoy classic bits like gyroscope, prism, and magnets. The Levitron and ROMP (random oscillating magnetic pendulum) are inexpensive and fun.

  56. Na plus a book by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    Let's give all 12 year olds 1 lb of sodium metal, plus a short book explaining it.

    The average IQ of our country's kids would double in one week!

    1. Re:Na plus a book by EricWright · · Score: 1

      Because 90% of the kids would kill themselves tossing the entire lb of Na into their bathtub?

    2. Re:Na plus a book by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I would just be happy if people uderstood why the statment:
      "The average IQ of our country's kids would double..."

      Makes no god damn sense.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Na plus a book by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      My point is that the dimmer kids would be removed from the gene pool due to hydrogen gas explosion. So the average IQ would go up, due to the remaining kids being (on average) smarter.

    4. Re:Na plus a book by Redwing · · Score: 1

      An IQ of 100 is always average by definition.

      --
      Raisinettes are my raison d'etre
    5. Re:Na plus a book by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      An IQ of 100 is always average by definition.

      Okay, sure. But is it defined to be the average over all American kids, or of some larger population?

      If it's over some larger population, than my original point is still valid.

    6. Re:Na plus a book by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      I think you've got it backwards. The kids who would kill themselves are the ones who are (a) smart enough to have read and understood the book, and (b) interested enough to ask "what happens if..."

      In other words, you've killed off the ones most likely to push science and technology forward, and preserved the ones that are either too timid to take risks or too dumb to read.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  57. how about by parallel_prankster · · Score: 1

    subscription to slashdot ? that science enough for ya ?

  58. maybe a robot kit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that way they will have at least one friend

  59. Definitely a Chemistry Set by Auction_God · · Score: 1

    You can still get a reasonable chemistry set on e-bay. Any new ones don't have much more than litmus paper, baking powder, and other non-toxic stuff. You can find cooler stuff just digging around under the kitchen sink!

  60. A Magazine? by mim · · Score: 1

    Engage the mind and the rest will follow. I loved Omni Magazine when I was a kid, but not sure if anything now comes quite close...maybe Popular Science or Wired, which might be a bit much unless your kids are precocious readers, but still wouldn't incorporate the full-spectrum of topics that Omni covered including really good sci-fi (not syfy!) and an amazing selection of original artwork.

  61. I can't believe nobody has suggested this so far.. by argyle77 · · Score: 1

    In the spirit of "Uncle Tungsten", get them spectroscopes.

  62. Lego Mindstorms? by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

    Programming and robotics?

    Mentos and a two liter of diet coke.

    A box of baking soda and a bottle of vinegar.

    A model rocket kit at any hobby store.

  63. SZob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suggest Snap Circuits, they are great for the 7-10 year old and with instruction can teach basic electronics. I have also found American Science and Surplus (http://www.sciplus.com/) to have a wide variety really cool stuff but they charge an arm and a leg for shipping.

  64. Sagan's Cosmos by ivoras · · Score: 1

    Give them http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Sagan's_Cosmos DVDs to watch. Greatest science gift for kids ever! (With the possible corollary that if they don't interest them, they are already lost :) ).

    --
    -- Sig down
  65. How about... by thredder · · Score: 1

    ... an ant farm? I was thinking of getting one for my kids this year.

  66. Try aniomagic.com (sewing circuits & ipod remo by nwanua · · Score: 1

    For a unique spin on beginning electronics. It's a very different medium from traditional science kits, but your kids can make usable, wearable electronics while learning about circuits. With the kits, you can sew a simple circuit to a shirt/hat/jacket using conductive thread and a tiny LED (perhaps for the 9-year old). You could also make a small felt accessory to control your iPod. There are a variety of kits, from really easy, to a bit involved.

    Tell them I sent you :-)

  67. Check out the GeekDad blog by OrlandoEsperanto · · Score: 1

    The GeekDad blog from Wired usually has some great sources. In fact they have a holiday buying guide here: http://www.wired.com/geekdad/tag/holiday-gift-guide/ [wired.com].

  68. If it's not an american flag... by pyster · · Score: 1

    pretty sure science is the fast path to gitmo!

  69. Developers, developers, developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their own Linux laptop and some introductory books on languages such as Python.

    Before turning 18, my daughters have to know how to cook, how to program a computer, how to shoot, and speak good English (not our native language).
    In the world they will be in, these are likely to be required core skills.

  70. A screw driver by SolarStorm · · Score: 1

    Seriously! Cause once they start taking things appart, they will learn LOTS!

  71. Electronics (and Chemestry) by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

    I bought my then-eight-year-old an electronics kit last year for Christmas. He really didn't touch it much until summer, when school let out. Then he had a blast all summer making various alarms, sensors, light sequencers... ...this year I think I'll go for a chem kit.

    Oh, and a linux-based notebook isn't too bad either. He is currently using an old one of mine to learn typing by using TuxType (http://tux4kids.alioth.debian.org/tuxtype/index.php) and doing math on Tux Math.

  72. Try Edmund Scientific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of science-based toys, kits, etc.

    http://scientificsonline.com/

  73. A video to add to the list: Cosmos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Carl Sagan's Cosmos is an excellent inspirational documentary for the real world child.

  74. Golden Book Of Chemistry Experiments by cain · · Score: 1

    Golden Book Of Chemistry Experiments. The wikipedia page has links for PDFs.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Golden_Book_of_Chemistry_Experiments

  75. The Best Present Ever - by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    Get a copy of this PDF 'goldenchem.pdf' print it on good paper and have it bound. You may be able to find an original copy of the book but not likely. Just remember when ever they open the book and try the struff, don't hover.

  76. Re:Help them get started with electronics+programm by gzsfrk · · Score: 1

    Count me as another vote for Nerdkits. I -so- wish that I had gotten mine when I was a teenager. But even having just gotten started as an old codger in my 30s, I'm amazed at how much I've learned from the amazing kit and instructional videos that the Nerdkits team has put together. Trust me--if you have a child who is old enough to use the computer by themselves and shows the least interest in programming, inventing, or even just has a tendency to take apart their toys (whether or not they're able to successfully get them back together again), get them a Nerdkit and help them assemble their first few projects. I think you'll be surprised at not only how much you both learn, but at how much fun you'll have as well.

    --
    m@
  77. Snap Circuits by warrior389 · · Score: 1

    These are awesome, and are good for younger kids too!

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=snap+circuits&aq=f&oq=&aqi=g10

  78. Mindware.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recommend Mindware.com. That is where I am planning to get the presents for my children.

  79. Another vote for this one by Mantle · · Score: 1

    I had one of these growing up too and it was one of my favourite toys. There are lots of opportunities to experiment by modifying the suggested experiments with changing resistance values and inputs and outputs.

  80. Electronics kits by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    Between the time I was six to ten years old, I was given a series of electronics kits that I loved and used to pieces (rather literally, at that). The last two in the sequence that I was given were the 200 in 1 kit and the 300 in 1 kit.

    After those, I hit up the local Radio Shacks for breadboards and the like, and Digi-Key when I was a teen. Radio Shack still carries some of the parts.

  81. Some ideas I have for my kids by mmoore · · Score: 1

    I grabbed this for my 9 year old last year last-minute and he loves it: Radio Shack snap kit. (Although I thought the kit I bought him was much bigger than this one). He even went beyond the included instructions and started experimenting with some interesting (and scary) things.

    This year, he's getting this book: We dare you

    Also saw one of these on woot the other day, but missed out. Still thinking about getting him one though: Excalibur Space Navigator

  82. a towel by godrik · · Score: 1

    Where ever you go a towel is useful. Don't forget your towel.

  83. Re:Help them get started with electronics+programm by cstec · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...Ages 7 and 9 may be a bit young... but we know that 11-year olds do well with getting introduced to electronics and programming

    11?!? What the Hell are you talking about?

    My 8 yr old has worked for years in BASIC and the Mindstorm's awful visual environment, has passed SnapCircuits (which rock) and starting raw wiring comps. Even my 5 year old is starting to work in Logo. Sure, they're quick, but statistically speaking I bet most of the kids of Slashdot readers are!

    Don't ever assume something's too hard. Throw them in the deep end and see what happens, you'll be surprised, and you can always give 'em a hand if they're drowing. Expect a lot and you'll get a lot.

  84. books, books, books by pz · · Score: 1

    The majority of out-of-field science that I know (I'm a professional neuroscientist), I learned reading books while in grade school.

    I still remember many of the images and wonderment from those books. I must have spent hours and hours studying them. I *loved* those books.

    These days, the equivalent are published by DK. They are horrible by comparison (everything is dumbed down to bite-sized paragraphs rather than presented in long-form that helps build concentration), but perhaps better than nothing.

    I have also head universal praise about David Macaulay's books (some of which are the aforementioned DK volumes) like "Underground", "Castle", "City", "Cathedral", and so forth, that go into the mechanisms of buildings and infrastructure.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  85. a quality calculator? by StandardDeviant · · Score: 1

    A decent quality scientific calculator and enough training with it that they can start using to discover the joys of solving problems. I think I had my first solar powered scientific calc when I was about ten. A handful of years later in high school I moved up to a more complicated graphing model. I'm sad to say I don't have the original calculator but I still have the latter. It served me well through high school, college admissions exams, and then a bachelors degree in the sciences. Of course these days I write boring but comparatively lucrative line of business web apps, so the most complicated math I ever have reason to do can be done with gcalctool in simple mode. ;) I still feel a bit of a rush when I look at my old calc though; we had such times together. :D

    I won't get into the emacs-vs-vi wars of TI/HP/whatever, but get them a solid useful tool that can be used for most any science endeavor and you'll have done them a favor, imho.

    (And yeah this might not be appropriate for the 7 year old, but I'd wager the 9 year old is mature enough or on the cusp of it...)

    1. Re:a quality calculator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, just get them a TI-89, or a Voyage 200, they'll be set for life past college with that thing. I love my 89, best calculator I've ever used and it makes multivariable calc oh-so-easy

  86. Classics by vekrander · · Score: 1

    Oh boy, reminds me of when I was young. Legos are great. If they have any sort of video gaming system the game of tetris is sure to enhance their visual/spacial recognition as well. I went straight down this path when I was younger:

    Year By Year Starting at age 7:
    Tetris
    Legos
    Microscope
    Telescope
    Crystal Growing Set
    Rock/Geology Set
    Chemestry Set
    Lego Mindstorms (Legos + mechanics + rudimentary system of programming = awesome!)
    Model Rockets/Model Airplanes
    .
    .
    .

    Age 21:
    GPS

    22:
    New Suit because I need to go get a job (in Engineering)

    As far as places to go, my parents had to get those things at toy stores/hobby shops because they were not as well acquainted with the series of tubes. Nowadays there's thinkgeek, newegg, buy.com, amazon.com the latter ones being more generic. For the budding teenage computer engineer heavy into microelectronics, try sparkfun. Best of luck!

  87. Best present we ever got... by mrjb · · Score: 1

    Batteries, wires, pushbuttons, little (incandescent) lightbulbs etc. I think it was officially meant for dolls houses, but it sure was great fun.

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  88. Lots for every budget., even free by syousef · · Score: 2, Informative

    For the microscope, get them interested with a "toy" one for about $30 and if they find that fun, move on to a more serious unit for $300 and up.

    Binoculars. I've been happier with binocs I picked up for $25 than I have been with a pair I bought for $150. Once you start spending over $50, you're best to do your research and buy a pair around the $200-$300 from a reputable brand. 7x50 is best for astronomy. Anything over 10x isn't suitable to hand hold. Zoom binocs are more fragile.

    Telescope. DO NOT pick up a department store telescope. Start them off with a dobsonian. (Good for everything but deep sky photography). What counts most in a telescope for deep sky observing is diameter. 8" is a good compromise. These days you can larger telescopes that collapse so you might be able to go up to about 12" but price increases with size. Make sure it fits in your car.

    Hiking GPS. One that does mapping. I'm partial to Garmin.

    Camera. Often overlooked, it can be used for a wide variety of things. Low power microscopy, bird identification. Something that does PASM. Ideally something that has decent macro and has at least 10x zoom. You can pick up brand new cameras that fit this description for around $200. They won't match much more expensive camera, but they do well. Next step up is an SLR.

    Radio scanner. Becoming less of a good idea as transmissions are moving towards encryption. But still an excellent tool for plane spotting. Take s snapshot with a good zoom camera and you'll be able to look up the plane's registration in a publicly available database which will give you make, model, owner etc.

    Chem sets might be disappearing but electronics kits that teach the basics are still around.

    For younger ages a good mechano set isn't a bad place to start learning basic engineering principles.

    Kites and remote control aircraft are excellent for teaching about aerodynamics. Anyone can fly a small kite but if you want to learn to fly r/c aircraft be sure to join a club and do it right or you'll waste time and money and have frustrated kids. Best idea these is to start on a simulator.

    Never forget the value of a good book or documentary. Carl Sagan's Cosmos is a little bit dated but still excellent. Universe. Walking with Dinosaurs....lots of good science stuff available. Your kids don't need to be cartoon and fairytale drones. You can set up one day a week to watch a series. If it's available for free on TV all the better.

    Check out some of the excellent scientific software around. Some of the most amazing stuff is free. From planetarium software to math software, it's all there if you're willing to spend time learning and teaching with it. Don't discount web sites as well. I can think of a couple of incredible web sites including NASA and Hubblesite. There's a lot of stuff that's out of copyright but still relevant. I just downloaded some out of copyright birding books the other day. Check out open library. There may even be value in university level Open Course Ware depending on the subject (but remember your kids don't know calculus so keep math topics light).

    If there's a local library, get your kids a library card and take them there when you can.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Lots for every budget., even free by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      James Burke's Connections series are excellent.

      Also don't forget the books. Henry Reed, The Great Brain, and Mad Scientists Club
      are all excellent series of tales about adventure, independence and using your noodle.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    2. Re:Lots for every budget., even free by rajanala83 · · Score: 1

      Not On-Topic but needs to be mentioned: "Check out some of the excellent scientific software around.": Thank heavens for primer3! free and usable; but nothing kids will need.

  89. A big rubber fist by Aan+Cocks · · Score: 0

    and a homeless guy to pracise with.

  90. Edmund Scientific by jbarr · · Score: 1

    As a kid decades back, I LOVED paging through Edmund Scientific catalogs.

    Now, as an adult, go visit their site: http://scientificsonline.com/

    If you can't find anything there, you're not looking hard enough!

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  91. Particle Zoo by Epeeist · · Score: 1

    Not really tools, but a lot of fun - http://www.particlezoo.net/

  92. The best science gift is... by venkateshkumar99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your Time. Don't just give them the kit (any kit) and leave it at that. Sit with them and YOU start making stuff with them looking and get them more involved as you go along. I remember my first geek activity. It was when I was 4-5 years old . My father took apart an antique clock apart and cleaned it and later asking me to do small things to do. That is what got me hooked to DIY. Later when I was about 7-8 years old my mom used to read short Sci-Fi stories to me and that's what got me hooked into reading. Spend time with your kids, they will be far more involved with whatever you do. As for the kits, anything from Chemistry kits to making models are equally simulating the important thing is getting started at an early age.

  93. Model Rocket kit by gawaino · · Score: 0

    Maybe your kids aren't quite old enough, but you could help them. I think I made my first successful rocket at age 10.

  94. musical instrument by f3r · · Score: 1

    Buy them musical instruments, perfect complement for the mind growth of a protoscientist.

  95. Science Kits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Edmund Scientific (http://scientificsonline.com/) has some pretty cool stuff for all ages. Heck, I'm 20 and I want most of the stuff on the site.

    They have a big selection of decently priced telescopes and other things, among kits, solar panels, and all kinds of stuff.

  96. Re:Do they still make those "electronic project ki by Knara · · Score: 1

    Heh, yeah. Mine was so old the most "advanced" bit was a very small solar panel on it. I was quite enamored of the fact that you could make the little lightbulb turn on and off just by putting your thumb over the panel.

  97. Check Playschool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They just released "My First Nuke" junior scientist kit. It even comes with little blast goggles.

  98. Science Kits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  99. Measurement devices by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Stethoscopes, scales, rulers, measuring cups.

    Other good things:

    Model rockets - If they are young they can help you build and then they can launch.
    Magnets, lots of basic magnets.

    A Place they don't ahve to worry about making a mess so they can make experiments fail.

    Encouragement in doing stuff, and you doing it with them.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  100. Re:Do they still make those "electronic project ki by Knara · · Score: 1

    May more advanced than the one I got, that's for sure. There's no springs at the terminals or anything!!

  101. How about owl pellets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our local science shop gets owl pellets in. They're sterile, easy to dissect, and generally contain at least one, maybe two, skeletons of some little forest creature. When she turned 7, my daughter was given two owl pellets to dissect and said they were the best birthday present ever! (Get some metal tweezers, too. The blunt plastic ones aren't generally good enough for fine work.) Look! It's a mouse! No, it can't be, look at the front teeth. Maybe it's a vole!

    1. Re:How about owl pellets? by narcc · · Score: 1

      Only on Slashdot would someone seriously recommend owl poop and partially digested rodents as an appropriate gift for an 8-year-old.

  102. BuckyBalls by thtrgremlin · · Score: 1

    Endless fun. Something simple, yet capable of demonstrating all kind of strange things. Really forces one to use their imagination. Best demonstration of how something simple can be used to do more complex things, like byte code, but less esoteric, and doesn't require any kind of reference text.

    --
    Want Big Business out of government? Take away the incentive and start by getting government out of big business!
  103. A good place to look by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    A good place to look would be http://scientificsonline.com/ AKA Edumund Scientific corp. They have just about every kind of science gift. I've ordered from them before and can recommend them.

  104. You din't nee chemstry sets by geekoid · · Score: 1

    if you can gt to a store. There are a lot of fun and safe chemicals you can get at the grocery store to experiment with.

    Speaking of which, cooking is science.

    Finally, LET THEM MAKE MISTAKES.
    For example. When doing the diet coke and mentos experiment, let them do it on there own. Just watch. They may get sprayed with soda, but so what?

    And laugh with them and teach them that failure is an option.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  105. Hide and Seek by phorm · · Score: 1

    But the other kids will whoop their butts at hide-and-seek. It's pretty hard to miss the glowing kid hiding behind the hedge.

    1. Re:Hide and Seek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what you did there

  106. How about a Giant Fresnel Lens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/21/1936210

    Not exactly the cheapest of 'toys', and lots of parental supervision needed, but showing the kids exactly how much energy we're getting from the sun should build both a healthy respect for the overhead furnace and a strong desire to melt/incinerate lots of kipple. Win-win!

    But seriously, effective harnessing of solar energy is one of the hottest (Sorry!) topics in modern days, and studying how different materials react to heat in different ways can be a great introduction to physics or chemistry.

  107. Two Gotos by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    1. Goto Alan Boyle's Cosmic Log over at MSNBC. He asked and got answered the very same question.

    2. My answer to him: Goto model rockets. A starter kit with a launcher and motors. A couple more kits of the same kind. One for the other kid, the other for you (getting you involved will be a recurring theme). Build them and fly them together. The small one in the starter kits can be flown from very small areas. If they enjoy it and want more, buy some more motors (mail order or local hobby shop), locate your closest NAR chapter http://www.nar.org/NARseclist.php find out when their organized launch is, and take the kids. Let them fly with the members and see some of the other rockets and higher powered motors. If they respond positively, join the chapter with them and make it a regular thing. Also, when you and they are ready to commit, you can get a family membership from NAR. BTW, there's not only a lot more manufacturers selling kits now, there are even some selling retro reproductions of some of the oldest kits, just in case you or someone you know was a rocketer back in the day and is feeling nostalgic.

    NAR #28965

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  108. Galileoscope by knarf · · Score: 1

    You can give them a telescope. Both of them, for their own. For $20 (plus shipping) per telescope which is of course a plus, especially given that they might decide that stargazing is not their thing. Then again, they might get hooked.

    Have a look at the Galileoscope site for an idea of what you'd get. Or maybe I should say have a look at the Google-cached version as the site seems to be unavailable right now.

    I do not have one of these so I can only go by what the site says so read the small print before you order...

    --
    --frank[at]unternet.org
    1. Re:Galileoscope by bongk · · Score: 1

      I agree with the few posts here that the Galileoscope is a fun kit to assemble and learn about a telescope, but I'm afraid a lot of kids could get disappointed and turned-off to astronomy if its the only telescope they have available for observing. Even with a good camera tripod it is difficult to use to find objects and keep still enough to get a good view. The optics are good, but relatively small and the focus mechanism is not as good as most telescopes.

      I definitely agree with the posts above that recommend a good quality reflector. The Celestron firstscope is around $50 and will give you a much better view and experience than the Galileoscope. If you want to get bigger there are tons of 4" reflectors out there of varying quality.

    2. Re:Galileoscope by bheerssen · · Score: 1

      I got one of these as a gift for someone. You'll need a tripod, but any standard camera tripod will work. Also, it took about six weeks to deliver, so it may be too late for Christmas. A portion of the proceeds goes to supply identical telescopes to disadvantaged kids.

      The quality seems ok for the price. It's a plastic telescope modelled on the one Galileo used, so don't expect high performance. However, it is useful for teaching some history of science and astronomy (and religion) so that's a bonus. There's a great companion site with lots of educational materials available for download along with detailed assembly instructions. (You will need that.The scope is not trivial to assemble.)

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
  109. Now for something completely different ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On a completely different tact, get them a football/baseball glove/frisbee/etc., then make them go play with the neighborhood kids. Not to say that a few "nerdy toys" aren't fine to get as well, but I would suggest that at this point they are probably best served by socialization and learning to appreciate and enjoy a wide range of activities (both intellectual and physical).

  110. Make Magazine! by Amigan · · Score: 1

    My 13yr old son has found Make Magazine to be wonderful read. Their associated store has some great stuff.

    --
    "Software is the difference between hardware and reality"
  111. Re:Telescope ++ by tkohler · · Score: 2, Informative

    Galileoscopes are $15 and have the added benefit that they are kits. Buy a couple. They are better and cheaper than toy-store variety. The best scope is one that gets used. (https://www.galileoscope.org/) I did a lot of research and a great, low cost, entry level microscope is something called a "My First Lab Duo-Scope Microscope". It sounds fishy but is sturdy, well made and not horrible optically - it runs about $60. Give "The World of the Microscope" book to go along with it. The Eyeclops(http://www.eyeclops.com/) is good for some things too if you have a TV to plug it in to. We buy a lot of equipment from Homesciencetools.com (http://www.hometrainingtools.com/) and American Science Surplus(http://www.sciplus.com/). Then best chemistry sets are the Thames and Kosmos sets. They are the least watered-down sets available now.

  112. Zome by feed_those_kitties · · Score: 1

    I'm a big fan of Zome construction kits. http://www.zometool.com/

  113. Edmund Scientifics by hrvatska · · Score: 1

    Edmund Scientifics offers a tremendous assortment of science tools, kits and toys suitable for kids of all ages. From the time I was in elementary school until high school, most of my wish list came out of their catalog. They will likely have something that will satisfy your budding geeks.

  114. Galileoscope by RandallSmith · · Score: 2, Informative

    I suggest checking out the Galileoscope:
    https://www.galileoscope.org
    a cheap ($20) telescope designed as part of the International Year of Astronomy to meet or exceed the specifications of Galileo's original telescope.

    I've got a number of them -- they're great for kids and adults.

  115. Gifts for children age 9 and up by ae1294 · · Score: 1

    Buy them a nice Laser Pointer...

    http://www.wickedlasers.com/index.php

  116. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What was Neil DeGrasse Tyson's name when he was 4?

  117. Get the kids a stirling engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.ministeam.com/acatalog/Exact_Stirling_Engines.html

    Way cooler than a steam engine.

  118. Science is a big word by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    If I know my nephew he'd be really happy with a book on cloning and a piece of amber with a huge ancient mosquito embedded in it.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  119. Great science stuff for all price and age ranges. by Deth4U · · Score: 1
  120. You can go wrong... by jdharm · · Score: 1

    50 lbs of neodymium magnets. I'm nearly 40 years old and I'b be giddy if someone gave me a gift like that.

    All kinds of things you can do with them...build motors, play with eddy currents, build structures, low tech rail guns, ... big fun.

    1. Re:You can go wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! Keep strong magnets away from little kids.

      See the crushed finger at
      http://magnetnerd.com/Neodymium%20Magnets/Dirks%20Accident.htm?1

  121. Home Chemistry + Microscope Advice by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 1

    You can't buy home chemistry sets in the toy store any more, but this book tells you how to make your own: http://www.amazon.com/Illustrated-Guide-Home-Chemistry-Experiments/dp/0596514921/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1260568406&sr=8-1

    If you get a microscope, don't buy one at the toystore. These are so gimped that kids can't see anything and will quickly lose interest. Look on eBay where in e.g. India you can buy solid professional grade microscopes for $100. Remember most microbes are transparent, so you either need darkfield cover (just a piece of plastic) and/or a small bottle of Methylene Blue solution otherwise they won't see the bacteria. Further suggestions: Hard to see single bacteria so also get a jar (a petri dish is better but anything with a lid is fine) and some agar (to grow bacteria in). Google is your friend.

    Good luck, and kudos to you for getting some toys that will help your kids learn as opposed to the usual crap toy stores are full of these days.

  122. Fischertechnik by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

    They make items from kids to professional engineer grade.

    Expensive, but the don't come apart like Legos and the robtics kit is top notch.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fischertechnik

    --
    Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  123. The Evolution Store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Evolution Store

    http://theevolutionstore.com/

  124. Thermite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A great way to "ignite" interest.

  125. Cambridge BrainBox by dshk · · Score: 1

    I bought the basic kit of Cambridge BrainBox to my son at 5, and this was the most successful gift to date. He played with it for nearly 2 years. He got the advanced kits of the Cambridge BrainBoxand, then later breadboards, discrete components and digital ICs. But it holds out so long time only if you have some knowledge in electronics and you are willing to spend an hour almost each day to help him.

    1. Re:Cambridge BrainBox by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      The Elenco kits came with manuals that included clear wiring instructions, so once I learned how to follow those wiring instructions, it was pretty much self-directed from there. Individually successful or not, my experiments and tweaks with the system held my interest and drew me to greater heights of curiosity, so as an educational tool, those gifts were a complete success.

      Granted, applying 9V directly to an LED with a 1.8V voltage drop and almost no internal resistance is something someone at that age only really learns not to do after they've done it. Well, they learn not to put the 9V directly across the LED. :)

  126. water rocket launcher parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Water rockets are fun and demonstrate several principles of physics.
    Provide your kids with the parts to make a launcher.
    Better yet, let them select a plan off the internet and take them shopping for the parts.
    Damm, why couldn't I have had nerdy parents...

  127. 2D Kits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look at 2D Kits (2DKits.com) - they provide the blinkie kits for kids at the DuckCon Science Fiction convention's "Build a Blinky" session - always extremely popular. My kids learned how to solder at the age of 7 - yours can too! Older, more motivated kids can build various kits from Ramsey Electronics (shortwave radio, FM transmitter, etc.). Hey - we're geeks. What can I say?

  128. real rock-hounding kit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if a "real rock-hounding kit" is typically sold as a package/kit unless they are fairly crummy plastic knock-offs. If you look around you might be able to find a good one.

    If you want the real thing, buy them an Estwing geological hammer directly or from a reseller, but ONLY with good safety glasses and work gloves to go along with the hammer (extra fancy: get the belt holster too). You might want to wait until they are older for safety reasons, because these things can be dangerous, and the safety issues with hammering rocks are not to be taken lightly (we're talking about potentially losing an eye here, and hammering your thumb ain't fun either). They must be old enough and responsible enough to always use the safety glasses. NEVER, EVER, EVER use a regular carpentry hammer for this sort of thing. The type of steel used is too prone to shedding steel shards. I'm fond of the flat-tipped hammers (better for fossils / sedimentary rocks), but depending upon what rocks they find interesting or the type of rock in your neighborhood, the pointed one might be more suitable.

    To complement the hammer you might want to look into a proper hand lens, something else that most geologists carry [I've had no dealings with the guys at those sites, they were just the first ones to pop up in google that had a decent selection]. Starting out, an ordinary magnifying glass is easier for kids to use, but a geologist's hand lens ("loupe") is much more durable and compact, although a bit trickier to use (it is very close range). Don't be fooled by "high power" lenses -- 10x is all you need for most things in the field and more than that is usually horribly distorted.

    7 to 9 is pretty early to start getting the "real" stuff. You might want to get something simpler, safer, and cheaper until they are a bit older, or get things that have multiple uses, such as an ordinary magnifying glass and a decent backpack (good for any kind of outdoor activity). On the plus side, though, even the best-quality "rock-hounding kit" stuff is a whole lot cheaper and durable than a decent microscope usually is.

  129. hmm by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    At the risk of sounding unintentionally harsh...why don't you get them whatever you think they'd most enjoy, rather than pigeonholing them into science toys?

  130. EDMUND SCIENTIFIC ASTROSCAN by AtomicDevice · · Score: 1

    God damn do I want one of those!

    --
    Ze Atomic Device! It iz Ztolen!
  131. Names and such by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    "My youngest knew Neil deGrasse Tyson's name at age 4."

    Well, don't leave me hanging, what was it?

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  132. Rattleback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have not read all the replies, so this may already have been mentioned, but one of the simplest, cheapest, yet most fascinating science toys ever devised is called the rattleback. Here is an Amazon link: http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000GYWYRW/?tag=googhydr-20&hvadid=4229887659&ref=pd_sl_92bxh7j0hj_e
    When spun in one direction, the rattleback will slow to a stop, then reverse direction. Trying to explain how this happens can lead you into some fairly advanced physics. There was an article in Scientific American many years ago (in the old Amateur Scientist column) explaining it.

  133. Other fun sciencey ideas by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    Sodium! Yes, the metal. Kids just don't learn enough about sodium these days...

    Or mercury! Show them how much fun it is to roll a ball of mercury around in their hands, as you teach them about how mercury is a metal, and a liquid at room temperature...

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  134. Re:A wii by GrubLord · · Score: 0

    Science Papa?

    I'm surprised I haven't yet seen a Slashdot article on outraged feminists' reactions to the Science Papa / Cooking Mama gender divide.

  135. On rockhound kits by khallow · · Score: 1

    If you're considering a rockhound kit, it'd probably be better for your kids and you to assemble your own kit. First, there's very few items in such a kit that are genuinely specific to geology, namely, a rock hammer, appropriate guidebook (rocks and minerals, fossils, and geology are the three categories I had when I was a kid), and maybe some identification aids (like some sort of hardness kit). Most of it comes straight from a hardware or camping store (chisels, hand sledge, outdoor gear (maps and compass), safety glasses, gloves, hammer holster, day pack, etc). I also rarely do a bit of gold panning (pans, sluiceboxes, and other placer deposit mining gear can be bought or made).

    A matter, which requires some consideration later on, is whether your kids want to display any of their finds. That might mean a nice glass sided cabinet or something pretty that you'd display on a coffee table. Some minerals are fairly hazardous (asbestos and galena) or delicate (gypsum crystals) and should be stored and displayed with care. I lost a number of nice specimens because I didn't protect them well enough (protip: you need a lot of padding, like feet of it, if you plan to mail gypsum crystals through the US postal service!)

    My thinking with a rockhound kit is that it'd be better to buy only the special items that you can't easily find and help the kids put the rest together themselves. You probably can get a better price overall, better equipment, and the kids will be more familiar with their gear than if they got it in one big pile. There's also the matter of weight. Your kids are going to be carrying this stuff plus possibly a bunch of rock. It can't weigh a lot otherwise you'll be the one carrying it.

    Don't forget the potential from making rockhound tools. I remember making my own screen box (very simple, a wooden frame with a screen bottom that lets dirt go through but retains large objects). That was one of the first things I made by myself and I used it occasionally for many years.

    Whatever you get, it probably would be helpful to get them involved in the setup activities as much as they can contribute. They'll need to be able to setup and use that microscope by themselves or put together their gear for the rockhounding trip, encouraging some self-reliance, and maybe you'll do a little less work as a result.

  136. Parrots by dgriff · · Score: 1

    My youngest knew Neil deGrasse Tyson's name at age 4

    My youngest could name all the engines in Thomas The Tank Engine at age 3.

  137. No, not stamps. by fliptout · · Score: 1

    The BASIC Stamp- microcontrollers for hobbyists.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_stamp

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
  138. It was silly to begin with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cats are conscious beings, and as such qualify as observers. That undermines a key assumption that is critical to the entire thought experiment, and rendering musing about it entirely moot.

    1. Re:It was silly to begin with by MathiasRav · · Score: 1

      Cats are conscious beings, and as such qualify as observers.

      Or are they?

    2. Re:It was silly to begin with by lahvak · · Score: 1

      Cats are conscious beings...

      Live cats are.

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:It was silly to begin with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Observation" isn't about being conscious or alive. It is about being in the range of causal consequences of a event.

  139. A Klein Bottle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they're mathematically inclined or simply onesided - http://www.kleinbottle.com/

  140. a box of corn starch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After they give you that classic WTF look you show them how to mix it with water to make a non-Newtonian fluid.

  141. I totally read the title as... by h8fulgod · · Score: 1

    ...SILENCE gifts for kids.

    --
    l8r, h8ful
  142. Telescope iff not in city by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

    I second that. Where I live there's so much light pollution that the Big Dipper and Orion are faint. The sky looks nearly empty of stars. It's almost shocking how many more stars I can see when far away from the big city.

    As for the planisphere, I find Stellarium works fine for that.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  143. a vote for Steve Spangler Science by careysb · · Score: 1
  144. Cool Science Toys! by Kilbanio · · Score: 1

    So many science toys look cool in the store and suck when you actually try them out. The Air Hogs line is a great example of when function unfortunately follows form. So many of their toys look cool but have the aerodynamic qualities of a brick. This is not to say that they have not had some great products over the years. I run a science education company called Mad Science of MN so I buy and test a lot of toys for use as activities in my classes. Here are my suggestions. #1 Lego Mindstorms NXT 2.0 I have been using the mindstorms systems for many years now and they are amazing. You do need to have a minimum of computer knowledge to get them set up so the kids can use it. There are so many things you can do with these sets it is amazing. If they really like it you can get them involved with the FIRST Lego League and they can actually compete building robots. It is a bit expensive but it is worth twice the price. #2 Brain Box Electronics These are the same as the snap circuits mentioned in other posts. They are easy to assemble and the color coded directions are easy to read. This brand is a bit cheaper than the snap circuits. You can short out the batteries so you need a bit of supervision or things could get hot. http://www.amazon.com/Brain-Box-500-Electronic-Learning/dp/B000NBY318 #3 Just about anything from Stephen Spangler Science I love this guy. He knows how to make science fun. His kits often lack the flash of the junk on the shelf at Walmart but they have it where it counts. Get a geyser tube to do the diet coke and mentos fountain. Do it outdoors though or you might need a new ceiling. Check out his other kits and look at the class packs if you want to do an experiment with your kids classes. #4 The OWI Kabuto Mushi and the Robotic Arm Edge I have been using OWI robotic kits for my robotics summer camps for years now. The Kabuto Mushi would be perfect for the 9 year old. It runs around on tracks, with a gripper that can pick up and carry small objects. Best of all it is wirless IR with 8 different channels. The Edge arm is my new favorite. It is expertly designed and easy for younger kids to assemble with some adult help. Both are great parent kid projects and a lot of fun when you are done. Both of these really kick their imaginations into high gear. Check out OWIs other kits as well. Thanks Colin Mad Science of MN

  145. Ferrofluids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get a ferrofluid starter kit - I got one from wondermagnet.com - just a 4oz bottle of ferrofluid, a couple of magnets, and a petri dish. I wish it had been a better kit, and there may be some out there. You'll have to come up with your own experiments, (different shape magnets, elecectromagnets, speaker coils are all good starters). But it's pretty amazing stuff

  146. Rootbeer Kit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about a kit to brew homemade rootbeer or ginger beer? These are fundamentally biological processes that can spark a great discussion and lesson on yeast, biotech etc. And they make something you and your kids can drink!

  147. How about giving them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    these two items:

    Apostol's Calculus Book
    Feynman Lectures on Physics

    That will help...

  148. Robo Rally by Diddlbiker · · Score: 1

    While you're at it, pick up a box with the "Robo Rally" board game. It's great fun to play and forces the players to think and concentrate in a playful way.

  149. Human anatomy models can be cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw some at a department store here in the Netherlands.

    They were very high quality, and very expensive (like ~40 eu for a small one, like an eye), but could be very cool.

    Can't remember the company name, and for that I am sorry.

  150. Edmund Scientific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://scientificsonline.com/

  151. Take them to a trip by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

    And teach them the wonders of nature. Astrology, physics and biology comes to mind in a field trip.

    1. Re:Take them to a trip by mikechant · · Score: 1

      Astrology, physics and biology comes to mind in a field trip.

      Is this a joke, some sort of megatypo, a Freudian slip, or (God save us all) serious?

      (Honestly, it's hard to be sure...)

    2. Re:Take them to a trip by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

      It is a drunktypo. I meant astronomy.

  152. Roller Coaster kit by bassman998 · · Score: 1

    As a kid, I received a kit that had pieces to build marble roller coasters as a Christmas gift. It was great for learning basic physics principles, and I was able to make my own designs and figure out why they did or didn't work. Mine was a Spacewarp kit (which are apparently still available at ThinkGeek), but a Google search shows that some other kits are Skyrail and Rollerscape.

  153. http://www.stevespanglerscience.com/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    http://www.stevespanglerscience.com/

    15 toys under $15... all look good.

    http://getbuckyballs.com/
    or
    http://www.theneocube.com/

    Just bought some for my 13 year old and now my 6 year old want some. Very addictive little toy.

  154. Gyroscope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My 8 year old daughter was fascinated by an old gyroscope at my inlaws. Bought one from Edmund Scientific. You never know what will spark a child's interest in science.

  155. Edmund Scientific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I loved their catalog while I was growing up. Apparently they are now scientificsonline, http://scientificsonline.com/Default.asp?bhcd2=1260574575

  156. electronics kits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a child my dad gave me a Radio Shack 100 in 1 electronics kit. I loved it. Radio shack still have some kits like

    http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId=3814337

    But maybe it would be better to just use Google to find some kits.

  157. rainbow maker by mandalina · · Score: 1

    your kids might be a little mature for this but a rainbow maker might be intresting. I got it for my 5 year old niece recently and she flipped. found a demonstration on youtube, check this out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5rsQwLq0EY

    1. Re:rainbow maker by mikechant · · Score: 1

      These should be prescribed for depressive illness (in addition to any other treatment, not instead!).

      These really lift my spirits when I'm down.

      I've been pleasantly surprized to find that they work really well even in the middle of the UK winter (i.e. today - 12th Dec - they are just finally fading out now, at nearly 3pm).

      Just about any child would love these, and at least some of them will then find the solar panel/gearing system/prism interesting.

  158. K'nex, Wedgits and Legos at that age by fhage · · Score: 1
    My kids got the most from k'nex: http://www.knex.com/ and Wedgits: http://www.wedgits.com/

    Both have excellent building guides, are very educational and fun to play with. Wedgits are great for the younger kids. K'nex roller coasters and ferris wheels would be well used and loved. K'nex teach about structural design, mechanical engineering and assembly. They start with simple, easy to assemble structures and get very complex, taking days to assemble at the high end. We also spent many, many hours building our own designs.

  159. Microscope by pubwvj · · Score: 2, Informative

    Microscope is the best. Decades of fun. They're old enough for a real one but even one of the cheap $25 kiddie scopes open up the world if the little things. Get one that is both optical and digital to connect to the computer. We got a National Optical Model DC-128 and love it.

    Next is a telescope.

  160. Mindstorms!?@ Where have I been... by beernutmark · · Score: 1

    Those Lego Mindstorms NXT's are totally awesome! I spent some time googling them and am blown away at what can be done with them.

    I think that my kids might be ready for them but will probably take the approach of getting them for myself and "letting" them play with it. If their interest grows then we can expand it.

  161. If you're good at science... by valderost · · Score: 1

    Look for science gifts in areas that you know well. This way you can extend the teaching far beyond the instructions by showing the kids all the other things the gift can do. This means that you'll have fun too, and the kids will think you're really smart! You can also toss instructions you happen not to like for some reason.

  162. Opal Science by cmlawson · · Score: 1

    www.OpalScience.com has a great little kit on opal and nanotechnology

  163. Air bottle rocket - 200 feet+ by witherstaff · · Score: 1

    http://nerdsinc.com/ has a few nice bottle rocket launchers. They take a 20 oz or 2 liter plastic bottle, add an air compressor, and away you go. The basic kit is pretty basic but I can say it holds up well to a few 8 year olds launching rockets for hours. Nice, simple, and it works great. Also a fun way to teach aerodynamics by designing fins and nose cones for the bottles.

  164. a usb microscope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would suggest a medium quality USB dissecting microscope - http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/electronic/cc14/ something like that. A nice, high quality scope is great, but a simple usb scope to look at bugs and grains of salt might get a lot of use. They're so simple to use, too.

  165. Organisms by flaznog · · Score: 1

    Bread Baking stuff or Gardening stuff like a small green house.

  166. Geocaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get them a trail GPS and take them geocaching ( http://geocaching.com ) . I started caching with my kids at that age and they love it. It's a great way to get out and spend time with them as well.

  167. Combo by bloobamator · · Score: 1

    Combine electronics and astronomy by having them build their own radio telescope. They can probably McGyver something using a basic Radio Shack kit and a trash can lid or something.

    --
    "Crude and slow, clansman. Your attack was no better than that of a clumsy child."
  168. Visible Man/Woman model. by NealBScott · · Score: 1

    Pretty much any 'visible' see through model. I won't ever forget my visible man nor my Visible combustion engine.

  169. ng by arunabh · · Score: 1

    hi how about National Geographic magazine subscription.

  170. Model Rockets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay I didn't read ALL of the entries above, but with as many as I did read I cannot believe no one suggested model rocketry. You can start small with a ~$35 dollar starter kit and from there, well the sky's the limit.

    http://www.apogeerockets.com/

  171. Re:Not plastic - Get a book! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Science toys don't teach... Parents do!" has some truth in it. In that vein, here's a few books by Martin Gardner that have fun projects to work on together.

      1. Entertaining Science Experiments with Everyday Objects
      2. Science Tricks
      3. Smart Science Tricks
      4. Table Magic (not strictly science but teaches observation and critical thinking while being a lot of fun)

  172. Model Rockets! by Bragador · · Score: 1

    I had so much fun when I discovered these at space camp. It's a great way to play with your kids too! Sure, the fun doesn't last as long as with videogames, but it is fun.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_rocket

  173. Thames and Kosmos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Santa brought my 8yr old son the TK2 microscope ( http://www.thamesandkosmos.com/products/tk2/tk2.html ) last year, and it's perfect for him. It's well built (metal in all the right places), with good clear optics, yet still targeted towards kids. It can be used to view specimens lit from the top or underneath. I think this will last him through junior high, if not beyond. You can find it under $100 too.

    Thames and Kosmos appear to have a good selection of cool looking science kits for kids, but I haven't had any experience with any of the others. They have kits for DNA experiments and fuel cells too. Check out their site - I'm sure something will work for your kids.

  174. ultimate science gift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't overlook the model airplane that I designed:

    http://www.rubber-power.com

    It's called the Squirrel. It can fly hundreds of feet and it's excellent for kids.

    Actually, I'm having better luck with adults as you will see if you look in the gallery at the site.

    Darcy

  175. Thanks! by beernutmark · · Score: 1

    Wow. Thanks for all the great tips /.

    I now have lots of neat stuff bookmarked for years to come.

    Thanks again!

  176. Bash Books by Technician · · Score: 1

    Bash books are a good start. Often how to attack a puzzle goes towards good problem solving. A good set of 3D puzzles is also great. Good mechanical skills is a must along with reasoning in 3D space.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  177. Re:Help them get started with electronics+programm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even 5 year old is able to explore basic concepts. I was able to explain to my daughter (5yrs old) what electric circuit is and how the current flows through a few basic layouts we created together. We used snap circuits (http://www.elenco.com/snapcircuits.html).

  178. More on geology/rockhounding by penguinchris · · Score: 1

    Good suggestions - I was planning on writing something similar when I read that part of the question.

    I'm a geologist and have some more advice regarding this. You have to be careful getting into rockhounding - it is distinctly separate from the science of geology. There's nothing wrong with it, and it's what introduces a lot of geologists to the field, but most rockhounds unfortunately don't know much beyond what looks cool or is most valuable. It can be a good introduction to the classification side of science, but there is a lot more to geology than that.

    Amateur Geologist is probably the best web site to order geology stuff from - it's not just amateur stuff, they carry all the stuff actual geologists use.

    Definitely get basic rock/mineral/fossil identification books - check some out in a local Barnes & Noble or Borders to see what you like, but order this kind of thing online. Check out the selection of stuff on Amateur Geologist - they've got a wide range of good quality stuff. More important than the basic identification books is something specific about the geology where the kid will be looking. Take a look at the "Roadside Geology" series, if they have one for your state. They're very good (if sometimes a bit outdated), written for the layman for the most part, and give you a very good idea of what you're looking at, how it got there, etc. This is where the real science is - figuring out what the rock/mineral/fossil means, not just what it is. You can probably find the books cheaper on Amazon than on Amateur Geologist; I haven't checked.

    You want to get them a good loupe. This is way beyond a kid's magnifying glass (i.e. it's actually useful) and kids (and the college students I teach in geology 101...) will get a big kick out of looking at all kinds of stuff up close. Problem is, to get something that's better than a cheap magnifying glass, you need to spend some money. This is the one I use myself, and it is excellent in quality with a lot of magnification: BelOMO 10x Triplet Loupe - about $30. Be sure to get the lanyard with it - this is something you want the kid to take with them everywhere, but it could be easy to lose. This is *by far* the most important part of any "rock hound kit" and will be the most-used item, because it's useful for all kinds of purposes (not just geology), especially for an inquisitive kid.

    For a rock hammer, again, it's worth it to go for the good stuff. This is the classic hammer you'll see most geologists using (or the leather handled version, which is more expensive) but it's quite large for a kid. They make a smaller version, though, which should be fine. If you're curious about the size and weight of the 22 ounce hammer, Sears and possibly Home Depot carry a bricklayer's hammer by Estwing that is similar in size and weight. Some geologists, particularly paleontologists, use those hammers. They have a flat chisel-like end rather than the pointed tip of the other one. You could definitely get away with giving one of those, but the flat end isn't all that useful. You're much better off getting a chisel that you can hit with the hammer for situations when you might need that kind of thing.

    Don't be tempted by the cheap versions - they may be fine for bricklaying or working with wood, but the rubbery grip on the Estwing hammers is really important. It can hurt a lot to hit a hard rock with a hammer that has a wood or cheap plastic handle.

    Here's a cheap holster for it. This is important so the kid doesn't put the hammer down and forget about it until it's too late, and to make them feel cool because they've got a

    1. Re:More on geology/rockhounding by khallow · · Score: 1

      Excellent advice. And while you're right about rockhounding not being much like geology, it is more like mining engineering. Not a great field for employment right now because most of the action is in the old Third World, but it is fascinating.

  179. DIY circuit boards! by Lorde · · Score: 1

    DIY circuit boards and a book on electronics! Or an Einstein action figure. I know I'd be happy.

  180. Arduino doesnt get a mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew slashdot had lost the FOSS. Just like when the fonz lost his cool.

    Open source hardware and software, thousands of projects, from blinking lights, all the way to 3d part replication.

  181. Give the best for the last 40 years (or more) by Allnighterking · · Score: 1

    A catalog from Edmunds Scientifics A Dream Machine for kids of all ages. http://scientificsonline.com/Default.asp?bhcd2=1260840634

    --

    I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.