Sure, but that (2 companies having similar names) is different than people saying "Apple" is too generic a name for a computer (or record) company would be.
You are aware that Apple Records *defeated* Apple Computer in court over this issue due to the Apple IIgs having a high end professional audio mixing chip (the Ensoniq DOC2, forerunner to the DOC3 used by Gravis for their UltraSound), right?
...or are you one of those ignorant twats that acts like an expert when they aren't?
Surprise, surprise. Rockoon is Trump supporter. Color me shocked. SHOCKED I SAY!
Never was. Never will be.
But you still seem to have a problem with veracity and accuracy. Not surprising from someone that produces logical fallacy after logical fallacy instead of sound reasoning.
Probably you simply lack the free disk space required on your system drive. Its silently waiting for the moment that you have 1 byte more than the threshold.
The process advantage is substantial, it allows Intel to have significantly more transistors for the same power usage.
..except that process advantage not only ends this year, Intel is falling behind this year as TSMC opens ite doors to full production in its 10nm fab.
This doesnt mean AMD gets that fab time (contracts with GloFlo may prevent it), but AMD isnt really Intels competitor. Only in imaginary simpleton land is a cpu design company like AMD a competitor to a semiconductor manufacturer like Intel.
The competitors to Intel are TSMC, GloFlo, Samsung, and Toshiba/Sandisk, At this moment all of these have 14nm, 15nm, or 16nm fabs running, and dont believe the hype that these are not "true #nm" as Intel isnt doing "true 14nm" either. In fact, Intel was the company that invented lying about process node size and the term "Intel Nanometer" is now a thing in the industry (for reference, the "Intel nanometer" was 1.182 nanometres a few years back before their "14nm.")
All of these companies will have 10nm fabs up and running before Intel does. While it wont be publicly saying its lost the lead until it absolutely has to, its actions will continue to be consistent with a company that has lost the lead such as the recent massive layoffs and the numerous recent press releases about some bullshit "cloud strategy."
Use your eyes. Dont listen to what Intel is saying. Look at what Intel is doing. If you have any Intel stock, its time to sell it.
No, it is not the answer. Because no third party ever has any real chance of winning important elections. It is essentially impossible because of the way the system is designed.
Tell that to the Democratic-Republicans, the Whigs, and the Federalists.
Its always been a 2 party system, but it hasn't always been these two parties.
The real collusion against it happening again is the requirement that a candidate get 15% in polling before being allowed in the presidential debates. Most polls dont include 3rd party candidates, therefore a third party candidate cannot get 15% in polls.
They had one until MSNBC took that demographic from them. Now CNN is stuck trying to play middle-of-the-road while still actually being run by lefties.
The lefties that run CNN arent socialists, but they really like the socialist narrative.
Slashdot Mirror
You are right, how could the junior varsity team organize anything....
patients arent being treated at the burning facility
Paper records are far more secure than digital ones
Just treat capital gains as income and pay the tax
Enjoy your empty retirement account.
How about I start treating you with respect when you build your own roads, your own hospital, your own water and sewer pipes,
He did, via taxes.
Thats the rub.. he gets to complain. Those that are a drain on the system don't.
Sure, but that (2 companies having similar names) is different than people saying "Apple" is too generic a name for a computer (or record) company would be.
You are aware that Apple Records *defeated* Apple Computer in court over this issue due to the Apple IIgs having a high end professional audio mixing chip (the Ensoniq DOC2, forerunner to the DOC3 used by Gravis for their UltraSound), right?
...or are you one of those ignorant twats that acts like an expert when they aren't?
PCs have been shipping with IME for several years now. Has this person been living under a rock?
Surprise, surprise. Rockoon is Trump supporter. Color me shocked. SHOCKED I SAY!
Never was. Never will be.
But you still seem to have a problem with veracity and accuracy. Not surprising from someone that produces logical fallacy after logical fallacy instead of sound reasoning.
..nothing to do with Trump, but hey it might fool people into not liking Trump if we say it is...
we are too busy feminizing young boys
Probably you simply lack the free disk space required on your system drive. Its silently waiting for the moment that you have 1 byte more than the threshold.
We do not have a photo realistic 3D simulation that millions of people play at the same time.
Who said that you were a player? You are one of the A.I's.
Let's say you have a computer program with 10,000 lines of code in it..
Why would we say that? Simulations often have very little code. Everything is emergent.
You seem to not understand how a simulation works.
When a simulated entity in your game dies, it doesnt magically become real.
The whole matrix movie was using bad logic anyways. The only entities in it that could have been "real" were the ones that re-spawned.. the agents.
Somebody might turn the simulated universe off?
Just... one... more... turn...
like a license plate stamp.
The process advantage is substantial, it allows Intel to have significantly more transistors for the same power usage.
This doesnt mean AMD gets that fab time (contracts with GloFlo may prevent it), but AMD isnt really Intels competitor. Only in imaginary simpleton land is a cpu design company like AMD a competitor to a semiconductor manufacturer like Intel.
The competitors to Intel are TSMC, GloFlo, Samsung, and Toshiba/Sandisk, At this moment all of these have 14nm, 15nm, or 16nm fabs running, and dont believe the hype that these are not "true #nm" as Intel isnt doing "true 14nm" either. In fact, Intel was the company that invented lying about process node size and the term "Intel Nanometer" is now a thing in the industry (for reference, the "Intel nanometer" was 1.182 nanometres a few years back before their "14nm.")
All of these companies will have 10nm fabs up and running before Intel does. While it wont be publicly saying its lost the lead until it absolutely has to, its actions will continue to be consistent with a company that has lost the lead such as the recent massive layoffs and the numerous recent press releases about some bullshit "cloud strategy."
Use your eyes. Dont listen to what Intel is saying. Look at what Intel is doing. If you have any Intel stock, its time to sell it.
No, it is not the answer. Because no third party ever has any real chance of winning important elections. It is essentially impossible because of the way the system is designed.
Tell that to the Democratic-Republicans, the Whigs, and the Federalists.
Its always been a 2 party system, but it hasn't always been these two parties.
The real collusion against it happening again is the requirement that a candidate get 15% in polling before being allowed in the presidential debates. Most polls dont include 3rd party candidates, therefore a third party candidate cannot get 15% in polls.
which is why we need to simplify legislation in general to say 50 pages max.
And require that all legislation to have a sunset provision with a maximum of 4 years before needing to be re-voted on.
In this case, they apparently took a subset of their results and compared it with radar measurements
One of the claims is that they copied some of the radar measurements verbatim into the WISE results
I'd call that more than hand waving.
Sure, its now dishonest misdirection you ignorant fuck.
In this case the ad hominem comes after the criticism has already been discredited.
Apparently in your world "discredited" means simply claim your are right and then follow it up with attack the opposition with an ad hominem.
Discrediting the criticism requires more than hand waving you ignorant fuck.
The WISE work has been compared to other data by a whole bunch of people
One of the criticisms is that some of the data WISE used was copied from that "other" data that its being compared to.
The defense of the data given that fact is quite circular.
The peer review process doesnt defend against fraud, and it doesnt take a big conspiracy for one guy to lead an entire team astray with bullshit data.
You arent supposed to question scientists anymore.
Soon they will be calling this man a "denier" or other such holocaust-associating bullshit.
They had one until MSNBC took that demographic from them. Now CNN is stuck trying to play middle-of-the-road while still actually being run by lefties.
The lefties that run CNN arent socialists, but they really like the socialist narrative.
1) Your grasp of the facts
2) The actual facts