Where you see free market in the USA I am not exactly sure, USA government is fully controlling businesses in USA with regulations and it is setting prices at the very least for each one half of every transaction by manipulating the interest rates (price of money itself).
How about identifying your exact physical location with an attack done over a phone/skype/whatever call, with the command sent through the speaker to the microphone that tells the robot to navigate to a particular site and purchase a particular product, then cancel the purchase... The address may already be passed as part of the order, now you know the person's precise physical location; next steps are anybody's guess...
So, Java, the language (and do you include the JVM into 'Java') is a piece of shit because many people tried hard to build frameworks (many shitty frameworks at that) on top of it?
My systems run on Java and we use no frameworks at all, only tier separation standard, no auto-magic, I like it exactly that way and it works as it is supposed to.
Actually it is massively under engineered and massively more expensive than it should be for what it does. It is under engineered because there were no constrains on the budget and so nobody thought twice when they needed to slap yet another expensive part on top of another expensive part to do what it does
I really don't care if FB tracks me or not that much, I don't have a personal profile there and I generally avoid taking pictures in any settings. More importantly I don't trust any government so I never cooperate with it, so there is never any real census information on me, that's my problem - the government, not FB. If FB uses census information to approximate my whereabouts it's off by a few hundreds miles.
As long as there is a single human that needs to be hired to operate any business the automation process must not stop. If I had a clothing manufacturing business I would absolutely want to reduce reliance on any form of human labour to the lowest possible number. Actually no matter what the business is the idea is to hire as few people as possible, the ideal situation is to have your own business and to hire absolutely nobody to do all the work. 1 human is too expensive, 17 humans is insanely expensive, but it is especially expensive when there are governments standing over the shoulders of the businesses telling them how they must hire and how they can or cannot fire people.
As long as there are governments meddling in the affairs of businesses hiring even one person is crazy and expensive.
Exactly so don't you want governments to use all publicly available data to ensure they only audit the people who need auditing rather than wasting both their time and other's auditing people who have filled in their returns honestly?
- no, I want the government not to collect any income or wealth related taxes in the first place and then there will be no tax cheating or avoiding or evading or whatever that people do in a completely rational desire not to have their money stolen from them. It is theft, any form of income tax is theft, so is any form of capital tax.
All government involvement in business, in money, in insurance is what creates all problems. Government should not be regulating any part of any business. Interstate commerce regulation has been subverted to regulate businesses, when in reality the regulation of interstate commerce regulation was given to the feds as a power to prevent States from creating barriers to commerce. The feds would stop a State from creating monopolies and from destroying commerce. Regulating businesses was not the goal nor should it ever be a goal.
Do some physical projects with them, simple logic gates, flip flops, adders, those are fun too and you don't need to explain code syntax, you can dive directly into addressing. I think I would have liked that as a kid. The way I got into it was because my grandmother bought me an adventure book, where to progress through the book I had to solve puzzles and write algorithms as code and debug through input/output on paper to decode parts of pages, next page jumps, things like that. It was good but I think I would have enjoyed building some simple logic stuff from simplest parts as well.
I guess I have been away from any form of Microsoft OS for such a long time it is completely amazing to me that there are people and companies out there that actually rely on antivirus software in the first place. I wouldn't trust any antivirus software provided by any company at all but I seriously would never trust any form of antivirus software coming from anybody in the former Soviet block (anti-virus software, which by definition requires highest level of trust on your computer). I am completely and fully amazed that people actually have to trust and they do trust companies such as Kaspersky to run their computers. I use a GNU/Linux distribution and OpenBSD for my computing, that's all I will say about that.
I have been sayingthis*forever* (it seems like forever). All of these people were telling me how wrong I was (just look at those threads, and those are but a tiny subset of all the discussions I had on this topic on this site and other places).
Browsers have been treating self signed certificates worse than HTTP where it came to security of forms and of information passing from client to server and server to client. The responses were invariably these: but *self signed* means it's not secure. Idiotic responses to the argument that a browser should not treat a self signed certificate worse than no certificate at all, especially given that it is possible to ensure safety with self signed certificates if the client has the fingerprint available. But even absence of a fingerprint never made a page with a self signed certificate less secure than a page with no certificate at all, but that's how the browsers all positioned it and prevented many people from rolling out their self signed certs.
The Internet needs to be encrypted and self signed certs are an important step in that direction and anything that spooks the clients away from them (more than from an HTTP site even) is counterproductive.
and you shouldn't be able to raise taxes 'on the rich'. Everybody must be equal before law, nobody should have a privileged position of watching others pay taxes while they themselves are not paying the same rate.
Everybody should be paying exactly the same income and property tax, which should be exactly precisely 0. Zero is the only correct and fair income and wealth tax, everything else is immoral and illegal theft and must be fought against with every breath and every second of every day.
Oh, no, USA is not Communist. It just gives a horrible name to Free Market Capitalism by destroying individual freedoms. USA is Collectivist, anti-individual freedom, a Statist system, however the ideology that pushes the masses is Communist in its most negative way. Communist propaganda has done amazing things to destroy the very nature of what USA is supposed to be - a country of Free People not Ruled by any form of government, not ruled at all but Free *from* government.
China is also not Communist, it is more Capitalist than USA for sure, but it gives a good name to Communism.
In this very story there are enough replies that offer Communist 'solutions' to the problems created by people who would rather see Communism than Free Market Capitalism in USA.
of-course since the government doesn't actually have any housing, doesn't produce or own anything what you are proposing is forceful nationalization of all resource, 'raskulachivanie', commisarial positions and totalitarian control of the collectivist government, abolition of individual rights.
Do you actually believe that this hasn't been tried before? What gives the you the idea that this time it will be different?
I disagree. The wealthy 10% should not give up any amount of their wealth to any form of Danegeld blackmail, they should fight the poor who are attacking them and destroy them if they must. The smart way of doing it would be with chemical and genetic weapons until there are finally robots that can take care of this pest problem (and I see this as a pest control problem, nothing else).
What are you yapping about? USA has been on the Communist path since the early 1900th, and certainly a gigantic number of ideas under FDR, Hoover, Kennedy, Obama, Clinton, Carter, Ford, Johnson, Truman, Eisenhower, shit even Nixon, Reagan and the Bushes were collectivist in nature. Collectivism bordering on subconscious and conscious ideas of Communism is what brought USA down.
Where do you see drivel? USA has been divided for quite some time now.
For example I am on the side of individual freedoms, anti-collectivism, anti-socialism, anti-fascism, anti-communism, anti-religion, anti-government, anti-income-and-wealth-taxation. I am pro-individual, pro-humanist, pro-choices, pro-free market, pro-voluntarism.
My position is unchangeable and is incompatible with most positions in USA and I will not compromise on them because there is nothing about freedom that should be compromised on.
On the other hand there are people whose ideas are the polar opposite of mine and we are divided and incompatible and I really do not need them and they really do not need me around either. I do not tolerate collectivism and they do not tolerate freedom.
Wrong, the alternative to one welfare scheme is not another welfare scheme, it is freedom from collectivism and from psychopaths like you that want to rule via the force of violence.
Slashdot Mirror
If it helps to take out the collectivist then I am all for it.
Where you see free market in the USA I am not exactly sure, USA government is fully controlling businesses in USA with regulations and it is setting prices at the very least for each one half of every transaction by manipulating the interest rates (price of money itself).
That is my problem to solve, but I made the message clear. Use drugs of any kind at work and we part ways immediately.
As an employer of 12 developers I would fire any one of them immediately if I learned of similar behaviour. That's the extent of my tolerance.
Meteorologist Jennifer Lawrence says Hurricanes are caused by Trump and his supporters and since she is in movies people must listen to her.
So how many people actually like that stupid 'feature'? I hate it, it is horrible.
How about identifying your exact physical location with an attack done over a phone/skype/whatever call, with the command sent through the speaker to the microphone that tells the robot to navigate to a particular site and purchase a particular product, then cancel the purchase... The address may already be passed as part of the order, now you know the person's precise physical location; next steps are anybody's guess...
So, Java, the language (and do you include the JVM into 'Java') is a piece of shit because many people tried hard to build frameworks (many shitty frameworks at that) on top of it?
My systems run on Java and we use no frameworks at all, only tier separation standard, no auto-magic, I like it exactly that way and it works as it is supposed to.
Actually it is massively under engineered and massively more expensive than it should be for what it does. It is under engineered because there were no constrains on the budget and so nobody thought twice when they needed to slap yet another expensive part on top of another expensive part to do what it does
I really don't care if FB tracks me or not that much, I don't have a personal profile there and I generally avoid taking pictures in any settings. More importantly I don't trust any government so I never cooperate with it, so there is never any real census information on me, that's my problem - the government, not FB. If FB uses census information to approximate my whereabouts it's off by a few hundreds miles.
As long as there is a single human that needs to be hired to operate any business the automation process must not stop. If I had a clothing manufacturing business I would absolutely want to reduce reliance on any form of human labour to the lowest possible number. Actually no matter what the business is the idea is to hire as few people as possible, the ideal situation is to have your own business and to hire absolutely nobody to do all the work. 1 human is too expensive, 17 humans is insanely expensive, but it is especially expensive when there are governments standing over the shoulders of the businesses telling them how they must hire and how they can or cannot fire people.
As long as there are governments meddling in the affairs of businesses hiring even one person is crazy and expensive.
Exactly so don't you want governments to use all publicly available data to ensure they only audit the people who need auditing rather than wasting both their time and other's auditing people who have filled in their returns honestly?
- no, I want the government not to collect any income or wealth related taxes in the first place and then there will be no tax cheating or avoiding or evading or whatever that people do in a completely rational desire not to have their money stolen from them. It is theft, any form of income tax is theft, so is any form of capital tax.
All government involvement in business, in money, in insurance is what creates all problems. Government should not be regulating any part of any business. Interstate commerce regulation has been subverted to regulate businesses, when in reality the regulation of interstate commerce regulation was given to the feds as a power to prevent States from creating barriers to commerce. The feds would stop a State from creating monopolies and from destroying commerce. Regulating businesses was not the goal nor should it ever be a goal.
Do some physical projects with them, simple logic gates, flip flops, adders, those are fun too and you don't need to explain code syntax, you can dive directly into addressing. I think I would have liked that as a kid. The way I got into it was because my grandmother bought me an adventure book, where to progress through the book I had to solve puzzles and write algorithms as code and debug through input/output on paper to decode parts of pages, next page jumps, things like that. It was good but I think I would have enjoyed building some simple logic stuff from simplest parts as well.
I guess I have been away from any form of Microsoft OS for such a long time it is completely amazing to me that there are people and companies out there that actually rely on antivirus software in the first place. I wouldn't trust any antivirus software provided by any company at all but I seriously would never trust any form of antivirus software coming from anybody in the former Soviet block (anti-virus software, which by definition requires highest level of trust on your computer). I am completely and fully amazed that people actually have to trust and they do trust companies such as Kaspersky to run their computers. I use a GNU/Linux distribution and OpenBSD for my computing, that's all I will say about that.
I have been saying this *forever* (it seems like forever). All of these people were telling me how wrong I was (just look at those threads, and those are but a tiny subset of all the discussions I had on this topic on this site and other places).
Browsers have been treating self signed certificates worse than HTTP where it came to security of forms and of information passing from client to server and server to client. The responses were invariably these: but *self signed* means it's not secure. Idiotic responses to the argument that a browser should not treat a self signed certificate worse than no certificate at all, especially given that it is possible to ensure safety with self signed certificates if the client has the fingerprint available. But even absence of a fingerprint never made a page with a self signed certificate less secure than a page with no certificate at all, but that's how the browsers all positioned it and prevented many people from rolling out their self signed certs.
The Internet needs to be encrypted and self signed certs are an important step in that direction and anything that spooks the clients away from them (more than from an HTTP site even) is counterproductive.
Oh, wow, and you know what? Washington residents cross to Oregon for sales tax free purchases as well.
Guess what, people do not want to pay taxes and rightly so and they should avoid and evade them everywhere and they do.
and you shouldn't be able to raise taxes 'on the rich'. Everybody must be equal before law, nobody should have a privileged position of watching others pay taxes while they themselves are not paying the same rate.
Everybody should be paying exactly the same income and property tax, which should be exactly precisely 0. Zero is the only correct and fair income and wealth tax, everything else is immoral and illegal theft and must be fought against with every breath and every second of every day.
You are a traitor.
- you are a dummy.
Oh, no, USA is not Communist. It just gives a horrible name to Free Market Capitalism by destroying individual freedoms. USA is Collectivist, anti-individual freedom, a Statist system, however the ideology that pushes the masses is Communist in its most negative way. Communist propaganda has done amazing things to destroy the very nature of what USA is supposed to be - a country of Free People not Ruled by any form of government, not ruled at all but Free *from* government.
China is also not Communist, it is more Capitalist than USA for sure, but it gives a good name to Communism.
In this very story there are enough replies that offer Communist 'solutions' to the problems created by people who would rather see Communism than Free Market Capitalism in USA.
Communism is a disgusting ugly concept that is incompatible with human desire for individual freedom and this horrible concept is being pushed forward by the weak minded and the psychotic.
of-course since the government doesn't actually have any housing, doesn't produce or own anything what you are proposing is forceful nationalization of all resource, 'raskulachivanie', commisarial positions and totalitarian control of the collectivist government, abolition of individual rights.
Do you actually believe that this hasn't been tried before? What gives the you the idea that this time it will be different?
I disagree. The wealthy 10% should not give up any amount of their wealth to any form of Danegeld blackmail, they should fight the poor who are attacking them and destroy them if they must. The smart way of doing it would be with chemical and genetic weapons until there are finally robots that can take care of this pest problem (and I see this as a pest control problem, nothing else).
What are you yapping about? USA has been on the Communist path since the early 1900th, and certainly a gigantic number of ideas under FDR, Hoover, Kennedy, Obama, Clinton, Carter, Ford, Johnson, Truman, Eisenhower, shit even Nixon, Reagan and the Bushes were collectivist in nature. Collectivism bordering on subconscious and conscious ideas of Communism is what brought USA down.
Where do you see drivel? USA has been divided for quite some time now.
For example I am on the side of individual freedoms, anti-collectivism, anti-socialism, anti-fascism, anti-communism, anti-religion, anti-government, anti-income-and-wealth-taxation. I am pro-individual, pro-humanist, pro-choices, pro-free market, pro-voluntarism.
My position is unchangeable and is incompatible with most positions in USA and I will not compromise on them because there is nothing about freedom that should be compromised on.
On the other hand there are people whose ideas are the polar opposite of mine and we are divided and incompatible and I really do not need them and they really do not need me around either. I do not tolerate collectivism and they do not tolerate freedom.
Wrong, the alternative to one welfare scheme is not another welfare scheme, it is freedom from collectivism and from psychopaths like you that want to rule via the force of violence.