Also there are some frame rate issues, I notice FPS lagging on some occasions. Strange because Burnout looked better and didn't have these problems. The visuals aren't the only thing that affect FPS. There's also AI, physics, and other things like that behind the visuals. I'm very sure GTA IV has more of those things than Burnout ever will.
Usually the arrow keys work fine for me for scrolling larger amounts, because I can just hold the key down until it gets to where I want to stop. It seems to me that using arrow keys to scroll is simpler because you just push a button with no other movement involved. I have a mouse with a scroll wheel and I use the arrow keys to scroll, all because it's less work to me.
If I could use that scrolling on my pocketpc's touchscreen though, I would certainly use it.
But in the years and years that I've used arrow keys to scroll, I've never once thought "Damn! If only I could scroll only one pixel at a time rather than this still-small fixed amount!"
I can see where some people would like it, but to me, it's nothing special.
I can scroll with one finger; it's called arrow keys. I've been using nothing but the down arrow to scroll down this page. Also, I've seen laptops with trackpads that have a small area to the edge that does nothing but scroll by touch (though only vertical scrolling).
From the limited amount of time playing with trackpads that I've had (don't like them, prefer the nub thingy, whatever the hell the correct term is), once you put another finger on the pad, it ignores the first one and moves the mouse to the second one. It might not work all that well, but someone could possibly make something that recognizes that the mouse just moved slightly to the side and assume it's from a second finger.
If I'm paying for what they advertise as unlimited bandwidth then I should receive nothing less than unlimited bandwidth. That means no limits period. If the ISP can't manage to provide what they advertise then they need to change the ads.
I'm guessing they just sort of chase the target and shoot, which would get too boring and predictable. Take out the autonomous and get some remote controls on them and these things would sure as hell be more entertaining than sawblades and hammers.
I'm at work right now, and I've installed Firefox, a bunch of extensions, AntiVir to replace the nonexistant antivirus that wasn't installed, Spybot, and Miranda IM.
Exactly how am I posing an increased risk to the network here?
I'll stick with my simple and basic looking P180. It can be just as super as this toy with the same hardware, and it doesn't look like a crazy plastic turd.
From the concept mockup picture, it looks like at least the video cards are supposed to be at the top in a mostly open place. I can't really tell from the picture of the actual product, but I should hope they stuck with that.
Probably can be written in PHP or python. But the way I see it, the scripts themselves are the vulnerabilities in most websites. So if they can hack a site using script vulnerabilities, what's to stop them from hacking this script as well?
Slashdot Mirror
Usually the arrow keys work fine for me for scrolling larger amounts, because I can just hold the key down until it gets to where I want to stop. It seems to me that using arrow keys to scroll is simpler because you just push a button with no other movement involved. I have a mouse with a scroll wheel and I use the arrow keys to scroll, all because it's less work to me.
If I could use that scrolling on my pocketpc's touchscreen though, I would certainly use it.
But in the years and years that I've used arrow keys to scroll, I've never once thought "Damn! If only I could scroll only one pixel at a time rather than this still-small fixed amount!" I can see where some people would like it, but to me, it's nothing special.
I can scroll with one finger; it's called arrow keys. I've been using nothing but the down arrow to scroll down this page. Also, I've seen laptops with trackpads that have a small area to the edge that does nothing but scroll by touch (though only vertical scrolling).
From the limited amount of time playing with trackpads that I've had (don't like them, prefer the nub thingy, whatever the hell the correct term is), once you put another finger on the pad, it ignores the first one and moves the mouse to the second one. It might not work all that well, but someone could possibly make something that recognizes that the mouse just moved slightly to the side and assume it's from a second finger.
If I'm paying for what they advertise as unlimited bandwidth then I should receive nothing less than unlimited bandwidth. That means no limits period. If the ISP can't manage to provide what they advertise then they need to change the ads.
Not my problem. I pay for the bandwidth too and it's not my fault that the ISP can't handle providing all of what they advertise.
I'm guessing they just sort of chase the target and shoot, which would get too boring and predictable. Take out the autonomous and get some remote controls on them and these things would sure as hell be more entertaining than sawblades and hammers.
I'm at work right now, and I've installed Firefox, a bunch of extensions, AntiVir to replace the nonexistant antivirus that wasn't installed, Spybot, and Miranda IM.
Exactly how am I posing an increased risk to the network here?
I'll stick with my simple and basic looking P180. It can be just as super as this toy with the same hardware, and it doesn't look like a crazy plastic turd.
From the concept mockup picture, it looks like at least the video cards are supposed to be at the top in a mostly open place. I can't really tell from the picture of the actual product, but I should hope they stuck with that.
Probably can be written in PHP or python. But the way I see it, the scripts themselves are the vulnerabilities in most websites. So if they can hack a site using script vulnerabilities, what's to stop them from hacking this script as well?