The solution to this "problem" is to write a new virus especially for the IE (ok, that's the usual case, I know), which changes the ident string of this browser to something M$ blocks... I would like to see the end user face while trying to access the M$N pages with this patched IE and geting the reply: Only displayable with the IE!
DMCA is a USA law and can't be broken in Russia. And _if_ in Russia ther would exist a similar law he could only be charged in Russia, not in the USA...
OK, I know, that this is a very subective way to see it, but never the less:
IMHO M$ has proven in many way, that inovation is not their big thing. I don't belive, that ever M$ will change. Before I by something from M$ I by anything else. I don't trust any standard set up by M$... and so on.
I simply don't trust... and I know, that this is not a technical point of view, but never the less I think that this is important.
My guess is that KDE and GNOME both aspire to be more than just window managers. Gnome is not a windowmanager, and AFAIK KDE isn't either (never the less, KDE comes with a windowmanager kwm).
Better: If you can't handle this responsibility, I will sue you!
The solution to this "problem" is to write a new virus especially for the IE (ok, that's the usual case, I know), which changes the ident string of this browser to something M$ blocks ... I would like to see the end user face while trying to access the M$N pages with this patched IE and geting the reply: Only displayable with the IE!
> First - the 'crime' occured in another country.
DMCA is a USA law and can't be broken in Russia. And _if_ in Russia ther would exist a similar law he could only be charged in Russia, not in the USA...
OK, I know, that this is a very subective way to see it, but never the less:
IMHO M$ has proven in many way, that inovation is not their big thing. I don't belive, that ever M$ will change. Before I by something from M$ I by anything else. I don't trust any standard set up by M$ ... and so on.
I simply don't trust ... and I know, that this is not a technical point of view, but never the less I think that this is important.
MartinHere is an other one (but not 100 percent uptime, since it is my private box, but anyway :-)
An other mirror...
My guess is that KDE and GNOME both aspire to be more than just window managers. Gnome is not a windowmanager, and AFAIK KDE isn't either (never the less, KDE comes with a windowmanager kwm).
Potato uses OpenSSH as the default SSH client, ssh -V reports: SSH Version OpenSSH-1.2, protocol version 1.5. Compiled with SSL. Martin