Oh look, here on page 13, "You hereby agree to the NSA spying on you without any legal notification of any kind."
sp: Phone Company is in compliance with Federal legislation including the Stop Criminals act, the Stop Terrorist act and any act involving you bending over. Please consult applicable laws in your area.
From the billions of dollars of public good that is Google Maps to their true lack of evil, from their sucessful attempts to make the world a better place to the way they treat their employees, Google is truly great.
ALL HAIL GOOGLE. ALL HAIL GOOGLE. ALL HAIL GOOGLE.
Yes! It has no utility! Like that ultra expensive Hadron Colider! Or theoretical physics! Or the first electron microsope! Or playing around with lightning and carbon!
In all seriousness, this is the first step on the road to a computer that can Feed Me Information Directly! yipeeeeee!
Robots will always be more expensive to build/run/maintain than people./i>
uh.. no. If a robot cost more for the same result, the company would not be using it.
Until you can create a robot that costs less than $1 a day to run and maintain (lots of people in the world live on that) you're not going to see robots replacing people at low-skilled, labor-intensive manual tasks.
uh... no. As a county's economy improves, its birth rate goes down. It would be foolish to project the number of people willing to work for a dollar any further than 15 years, and that's for the whole world. India and China are experiencing wage growth right now. When the person costs more than the robot, the robot will be used.
In other words, it's cheaper to buy and pay maintenance on a robot welder to build cars than to pay a union worker, but it's cheaper to hire some high-school dropout to dig ditches than to buy and maintain a ditch-digging robot.
Do you maintain that stance while non-unionized Japan is the world leader in robots? Do you maintain it knowing that they got that way by building cars? Do you maintain it knowing that in China and India cars are made by robots? High school dropouts will only dig ditches as long as a ditch-digging robot costs less.
I remember when Hewlett Packard was a trusted name in printing. Their HP 9871A was an industry revolution and every printer they made was build to last. Then some time in the late '90s I bought an HP printer and IT WAS A DOG. The damn thing couldn't print on a straight line, was made of thin, thin plastic, had cartridges that cost more than the damn printer... and all my years of loyalty to the HP name went whooooooooshhhhh. That was about the time they started making computers.
...ruin it for the peaceful protesters... Bullshit. If cause for arrest cannot be found for each person than arresting that person is a crime. "someone may commit a crime so lets round them all up" is the primary tactic of a police state.
I have another example too! I made this free database program and they wouldn't buy it either! Of course the only guy who knows how to set up my program wanted a seven digit income, none of their people are trained, and there is some assembly required but damnit, my program had a much lower retail price! They're ripping themselves off by not using it!
While military technology has been one of the primary leaders of general technology for thousands of years, it would be nice if there could be more non-military leaps.
Could this technique be used for general astronamy as well, making use of temporary increases in gravitational lensing? I know that gravitational lensing is being made use of, but I bet there are fluctuations that have, until now, been seen only as a limitation.
Their profits ony rose 13% in the first quarter! And they're not the number one company in the world for laying out cash for child care anymore! And my foi gras was.03 cm under standard size! waaaaaaa!
Okay, one of you people that claim piracy is always okay, riddle me this. If this person profited by selling a piece of software that took money, time, and labor to make, how did he not deny someone the money they should have made? And don't pretend that the people who bought these systems thought the games were so cool they had to go out and buy a copy.
This is not giving a copy to your friend, this is a direct theft of value from the software writers. Call it "copyright violation" or call it "selling someone's work without paying them for it" this was wrong.
The mistake you're making is failing to diferentiate between surveilance for limited use and wide-spread surveilance. With limited-use surveilance, it is possible to investigate each case of abnormal behavior.
Rather than solving the problem, removing the AI takes a step back in product evolution. The infamous They will have to do one of three things: Outlaw any unusual behavior, Investigate every abnormal behavior, or Ignore some abnormal behavior. The first two of these are different because in a police state, it is not necessary to investigate as long as it can be claimed that a crime was committed.
Option 1, outlawing abnormal behavior, would only be possible with the most brainwashed citizens: Once everyone has a close family member who has been harrassed, the government becomes increasingly unpopular. Option 2, essentially having a real person watch every case of abnormal behavior, is too expensive for monitoring a large group. Option 3 is impossible without the AI.
e r
i n a
s o a c
t u n t
h g d c e
i h a h r
s s t r d a s
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 ?
I hate the lameness filter. I hate the lameness filter. I hate the lameness fil1er. I hate the lameness fi2ter. I hate the lameness fi3ter. I hate the lameness fi4ter. I hate the lameness fil1er. I hate the lameness fi2ter. I hate the lameness fi3ter. I hate the lameness fi4ter. I hate the lameness filter. I hate the lameness filter. I hate the lameness fil1er. I hate the lameness fi2ter. I hate the lameness fi3ter. I hate the lameness fi4ter. I hate the lameness fil5er. I hate the lameness fi6ter. I hate the lameness fi7ter. I hate the lameness fi8ter. I hate the lameness fi9ter. I hate the lameness fil0ter. I hate the lameness fil1er. I hate the lameness fi2ter. I hate the lameness fi3ter. I hate the lameness fi4ter. I hate the lameness fil1er. I hate the lameness fi2ter. I hate the lameness fi3ter. I hate the lameness fi4ter. Is that enough standard characters you bastard?
His average is 21.7 days, with an average score of 1.04 since March, 2007.
He has recieved 6 -1s, 7 0s, 1 1, 5 2s, 0 3s, 1 4, and 3 5s.
The mode is 7, the standard deviation is 3.7 if I calculated it right.
what the real world item will be like then improve the model. Next time you can use the model. With all due respect to the Old School of Engineering, I wouldn't plant a farm using a mule, I wouldn't design a house with an abacus, I wouldn't write software without a compiler, and I wouldn't walk the 30 kilometers to work every day.
Technology is used because it has proven itself to be better for the task. Yes! you will have mistakes and discrepencies. But today's models are only unhelpful when they are misused. For example, the computer modeled piece of electronics someone mentioned did not include modeling the assembly process.
From a spoon to a Boeing 777, everything in the realm of common physics can now be properly and completely modeled on a computer. Building a model by hand is no longer useful than to let you reach out and touch your creation, or to let more tactile learners understand engineering better.
Providing to your opponent before negotiations, interfacing with a laptop, interfacing with a graphing display, interfacing with a network, math tutorials, business how-tos and templates and thats just off the top of my head...
God forbid that a government bureaucrat should do whats best for society, or that a politician should tell his voters, "This is the best priority for these things, and this is why". God forbid the press should actually investigate and make a decision based on something other than sensationalism. God forbid the public should be given information instead of manipulated through fear. They would be ice skating in hell through the year 3000.
Ad-hoc vehicle-to-vehicle connections that can be hacked without vehicles crashing and are: Fast, Prioritizable, ("my brakes are broken" is more important than "I would like to turn left in 50 meters") robust, standardizable, platform independant, extendable, and don't depend on a vehicle ID. What protocol is that?
Slashdot Mirror
Oh look, here on page 13, "You hereby agree to the NSA spying on you without any legal notification of any kind."
sp: Phone Company is in compliance with Federal legislation including the Stop Criminals act, the Stop Terrorist act and any act involving you bending over. Please consult applicable laws in your area.
From the billions of dollars of public good that is Google Maps to their true lack of evil, from their sucessful attempts to make the world a better place to the way they treat their employees, Google is truly great.
ALL HAIL GOOGLE. ALL HAIL GOOGLE. ALL HAIL GOOGLE.
I'm fine, but thanks anyway.
Yes! It has no utility! Like that ultra expensive Hadron Colider! Or theoretical physics! Or the first electron microsope! Or playing around with lightning and carbon!
In all seriousness, this is the first step on the road to a computer that can Feed Me Information Directly! yipeeeeee!
Robots will always be more expensive to build/run/maintain than people./i>
uh.. no. If a robot cost more for the same result, the company would not be using it.
Until you can create a robot that costs less than $1 a day to run and maintain (lots of people in the world live on that) you're not going to see robots replacing people at low-skilled, labor-intensive manual tasks.
uh... no. As a county's economy improves, its birth rate goes down. It would be foolish to project the number of people willing to work for a dollar any further than 15 years, and that's for the whole world. India and China are experiencing wage growth right now. When the person costs more than the robot, the robot will be used.
In other words, it's cheaper to buy and pay maintenance on a robot welder to build cars than to pay a union worker, but it's cheaper to hire some high-school dropout to dig ditches than to buy and maintain a ditch-digging robot.
Do you maintain that stance while non-unionized Japan is the world leader in robots? Do you maintain it knowing that they got that way by building cars? Do you maintain it knowing that in China and India cars are made by robots? High school dropouts will only dig ditches as long as a ditch-digging robot costs less.
I remember when Hewlett Packard was a trusted name in printing. Their HP 9871A was an industry revolution and every printer they made was build to last. Then some time in the late '90s I bought an HP printer and IT WAS A DOG. The damn thing couldn't print on a straight line, was made of thin, thin plastic, had cartridges that cost more than the damn printer... and all my years of loyalty to the HP name went whooooooooshhhhh. That was about the time they started making computers.
...ruin it for the peaceful protesters... Bullshit. If cause for arrest cannot be found for each person than arresting that person is a crime. "someone may commit a crime so lets round them all up" is the primary tactic of a police state.
That's right! they're pissing away money!
I have another example too! I made this free database program and they wouldn't buy it either! Of course the only guy who knows how to set up my program wanted a seven digit income, none of their people are trained, and there is some assembly required but damnit, my program had a
much lower retail price! They're ripping themselves off by not using it!
To what use will this long, long prime be put?
While military technology has been one of the primary leaders of general technology for thousands of years, it would be nice if there could be more non-military leaps.
Could this technique be used for general astronamy as well, making use of temporary increases in gravitational lensing? I know that gravitational lensing is being made use of, but I bet there are fluctuations that have, until now, been seen only as a limitation.
Really? No Model?
.03 cm under standard size! waaaaaaa!
Their profits ony rose 13% in the first quarter! And they're not the number one company in the world for laying out cash for child care anymore! And my foi gras was
Okay, one of you people that claim piracy is always okay, riddle me this. If this person profited by selling a piece of software that took money, time, and labor to make, how did he not deny someone the money they should have made? And don't pretend that the people who bought these systems thought the games were so cool they had to go out and buy a copy.
This is not giving a copy to your friend, this is a direct theft of value from the software writers. Call it "copyright violation" or call it "selling someone's work without paying them for it" this was wrong.
The mistake you're making is failing to diferentiate between surveilance for limited use and wide-spread surveilance. With limited-use surveilance, it is possible to investigate each case of abnormal behavior.
Rather than solving the problem, removing the AI takes a step back in product evolution. The infamous They will have to do one of three things: Outlaw any unusual behavior, Investigate every abnormal behavior, or Ignore some abnormal behavior. The first two of these are different because in a police state, it is not necessary to investigate as long as it can be claimed that a crime was committed.
Option 1, outlawing abnormal behavior, would only be possible with the most brainwashed citizens: Once everyone has a close family member who has been harrassed, the government becomes increasingly unpopular. Option 2, essentially having a real person watch every case of abnormal behavior, is too expensive for monitoring a large group. Option 3 is impossible without the AI.
test sig: please ignore.
That was a graph until slashdot stole my formatting. At the bottom of the screen you can read "Forgive and forget."
e r
i n a
s o a c
t u n t
h g d c e
i h a h r
s s t r d a s
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 ?
I hate the lameness filter. I hate the lameness filter. I hate the lameness fil1er. I hate the lameness fi2ter. I hate the lameness fi3ter. I hate the lameness fi4ter. I hate the lameness fil1er. I hate the lameness fi2ter. I hate the lameness fi3ter. I hate the lameness fi4ter. I hate the lameness filter. I hate the lameness filter. I hate the lameness fil1er. I hate the lameness fi2ter. I hate the lameness fi3ter. I hate the lameness fi4ter. I hate the lameness fil5er. I hate the lameness fi6ter. I hate the lameness fi7ter. I hate the lameness fi8ter. I hate the lameness fi9ter. I hate the lameness fil0ter. I hate the lameness fil1er. I hate the lameness fi2ter. I hate the lameness fi3ter. I hate the lameness fi4ter. I hate the lameness fil1er. I hate the lameness fi2ter. I hate the lameness fi3ter. I hate the lameness fi4ter. Is that enough standard characters you bastard?
His average is 21.7 days, with an average score of 1.04 since March, 2007. He has recieved 6 -1s, 7 0s, 1 1, 5 2s, 0 3s, 1 4, and 3 5s. The mode is 7, the standard deviation is 3.7 if I calculated it right.
what the real world item will be like then improve the model. Next time you can use the model. With all due respect to the Old School of Engineering, I wouldn't plant a farm using a mule, I wouldn't design a house with an abacus, I wouldn't write software without a compiler, and I wouldn't walk the 30 kilometers to work every day.
Technology is used because it has proven itself to be better for the task. Yes! you will have mistakes and discrepencies. But today's models are only unhelpful when they are misused. For example, the computer modeled piece of electronics someone mentioned did not include modeling the assembly process.
From a spoon to a Boeing 777, everything in the realm of common physics can now be properly and completely modeled on a computer. Building a model by hand is no longer useful than to let you reach out and touch your creation, or to let more tactile learners understand engineering better.
Providing to your opponent before negotiations, interfacing with a laptop, interfacing with a graphing display, interfacing with a network, math tutorials, business how-tos and templates and thats just off the top of my head...
is full of hyperbole, dogma, propaganda, and meaningless blatherings.
God forbid that a government bureaucrat should do whats best for society, or that a politician should tell his voters, "This is the best priority for these things, and this is why". God forbid the press should actually investigate and make a decision based on something other than sensationalism. God forbid the public should be given information instead of manipulated through fear. They would be ice skating in hell through the year 3000.
People actually enter their real information? I just put a password that I know well.
Look further, my miopic friend. It won't always be a human at the wheel.
Ad-hoc vehicle-to-vehicle connections that can be hacked without vehicles crashing and are: Fast, Prioritizable, ("my brakes are broken" is more important than "I would like to turn left in 50 meters") robust, standardizable, platform independant, extendable, and don't depend on a vehicle ID. What protocol is that?
Can anyone tell me the verticle relief?
OH! I get it! like the horrible economic reality that its in my best interests to steal cars as long as I don't get caught