I convert the PDF form to PNG using ImageMagick, then I draw my content into the PNG using Gimp, finally converting the PNG back to PDF via Gimp's print to file.
If encryption technology is to blame to hide the planning of such an attack, then the other technologies used to execute the attack deserves a similar blame.
Code is good when the data structures clearly model the problem domain.
The algorithmic code / control flow then follows naturally and is easier understandable.
Does this mean when I'm listening via headphones and I turn my head that an accoustical source will stay in the same absolute direction, or does it stay in the same direction relative to my (turning) head which is today's headphone experience?
I wouldn't be surprised if the more idiosyncratic tactile experience of reading a physical book positively affects the reader's ability to memorize the content.
But won't telling the patient "the facts" diminish the placebo effect?
What would maximize the placebo effect?
Is using the placebo effect always bad practice?
Typically no two software engineers agree on a solution.
Business introduces additional constraints and decisions.
Younger folks want to reinvent the wheel.
Etc.
...is the future.
It's more just: No observers of an infraction, no problem, regardless of the letter of the law.
I'd just add a reputation based moderation system to supress malice.
Why not let them conduct this "experiment"?
The results will be useful as a negative example.
And just make sure the people responsible are not forgotten.
I convert the PDF form to PNG using ImageMagick, then I draw my content into the PNG using Gimp, finally converting the PNG back to PDF via Gimp's print to file.
Ocean? I said terrain.
How about shaping terrain to guide tornadoes on a specific path?
Filters->Artistic->Rembrandt ???
This should then also apply to, let's say, manufacturers of cars used by enemies, right? After all, cars usually do give "aid and comfort".
If encryption technology is to blame to hide the planning of such an attack, then the other technologies used to execute the attack deserves a similar blame.
Time to service your sextant and brush up on your celestial navigation skills.
It's impossible to know what the ultimate observer is.
...and no money.
Code is good when the data structures clearly model the problem domain. The algorithmic code / control flow then follows naturally and is easier understandable.
Let me fully understand it... What happens when I'm listening via headphones and I turn my head? Will the sound stay in the same absolute direction?
Does this mean when I'm listening via headphones and I turn my head that an accoustical source will stay in the same absolute direction, or does it stay in the same direction relative to my (turning) head which is today's headphone experience?
This approach should be used to reduce the necessary bandwidth in video conferencing situations!
from the outside, I don't care.
...to keep the many in check.
I wouldn't be surprised if the more idiosyncratic tactile experience of reading a physical book positively affects the reader's ability to memorize the content.
Just as a thought experiment, imagine your parents (or whatever "loved ones" you value) being in one of these 20 cities...
...it's about remembering to not serve out this piece of information.
Even if machines eventually acquire a form of consciousness, how would *we* know?
Who would believe a machine's claim to be conscious?
But won't telling the patient "the facts" diminish the placebo effect?
What would maximize the placebo effect?
Is using the placebo effect always bad practice?
Typically no two software engineers agree on a solution.
Business introduces additional constraints and decisions.
Younger folks want to reinvent the wheel.
Etc.
With text you can develop muscle memory (muscle macros) which can be applied without concious thinking while expressing abstract ideas.
...is the future.
It's more just: No observers of an infraction, no problem, regardless of the letter of the law.
I'd just add a reputation based moderation system to supress malice.
Why not let them conduct this "experiment"?
The results will be useful as a negative example.
And just make sure the people responsible are not forgotten.
Dealing with established cultures working with outdated technologies and trying to drive change.