What if I stated daily that I have not received an NSL.
When I receive an NSL, my daily statements would seize.
This way I would comply with the NSL, but it was obvious that I have received one.
Traffic enforcement should be crowd-sourced, with reputation-based ranking like the Slashdot moderation system.
If there's no one documenting a traffic violation, there's no problem.
The more people are in the vicinity to documenting it, the more expensive it gets for the violator.
Reputation management to maximize honesty.
The system will be fine-tuned as it gains more participants.
Still too many clicks.
Unable to store a successful config and reproduce it with a single hot key.
After long time fiddling with nv-control-dpy and xrandr I have a somewhat working solution, which crashes the X server every time I go from my home config to my office config.
So in your mind what should be the only legitimate sources to draw from for entertainment?
And isn't entertainment a lot about making an audience feel better than their objective reality would actually warrant?
As a sender of a message I regard the message to be in transition until it reaches the recipient *I* intended.
Therefore it should be treated as the interception of a message in transit when the wrong person reads of an end device which is not hers.
Problem is that a good portion of the population won't be able to afford this technology, because their jobs got automated by the very same technology.
Phone should have a "plausible deniability" mode where it appears like a regular, non-secure phone, easily giving up lots of details to any browsing / scanning attempt, while hiding all secure content.
Slashdot Mirror
from heart disease, what will they then die from? And how much will that cost?
Why is the new design wasting so much of horizontal screen real estate? The design should leverage the full browser window!
Why does everything being fun have to be turned into a competion where there's an incentive to cheat?
The same automation technology will have placed so many people out of work who then no longer can afford these cars.
I learned recently that this already exists: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrant_canary
Set up honey pot cars, catch the thieves, charge them for the honey pot expenses and some more: Profit!
Self-financing mechanism to reduce car thefts.
According to this theory, the millenials are a "hero (civic)" type of generation and actually not really authority phobic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generations_(book)#Hero
Just learned this is called a Warrant Canary.
What if I stated daily that I have not received an NSL. When I receive an NSL, my daily statements would seize. This way I would comply with the NSL, but it was obvious that I have received one.
And your point is?
Traffic enforcement should be crowd-sourced, with reputation-based ranking like the Slashdot moderation system. If there's no one documenting a traffic violation, there's no problem. The more people are in the vicinity to documenting it, the more expensive it gets for the violator. Reputation management to maximize honesty. The system will be fine-tuned as it gains more participants.
Once our cars are as "smart" as our phones today, traffic enforcement can be crowd-sourced.
I'd guess not.
Who will buy all the shit, if they don't make money?
Still too many clicks.
Unable to store a successful config and reproduce it with a single hot key.
After long time fiddling with nv-control-dpy and xrandr I have a somewhat working solution, which crashes the X server every time I go from my home config to my office config.
If there's no need for drivers anymore, where will those people who used to be drivers make their living of?
So in your mind what should be the only legitimate sources to draw from for entertainment?
And isn't entertainment a lot about making an audience feel better than their objective reality would actually warrant?
As a cheap way to do email: http://www.sailmail.com/
Besides buying all these gadgets, I'd learn celestial navigation as a backup when all your electronics are getting fried by lightning.
As a sender of a message I regard the message to be in transition until it reaches the recipient *I* intended. Therefore it should be treated as the interception of a message in transit when the wrong person reads of an end device which is not hers.
Problem is that a good portion of the population won't be able to afford this technology, because their jobs got automated by the very same technology.
Is this finally the ansible?
Phone should have a "plausible deniability" mode where it appears like a regular, non-secure phone, easily giving up lots of details to any browsing / scanning attempt, while hiding all secure content.
Still no ansible I guess.
No, that's different. The meter and the pyramids do exist simultaneously.