Adding multiple inheritance to PHP
on
PHP 5.4 Released
·
· Score: -1, Flamebait
PHP is like a poo someone took on your carpet. But then they feel that wasn't enough and ejaculate on their poo or in the case of PHP add multiple inheritance.
Of all the things that should be fixed in PHP the lack of inheritance was not one of those things.
My machine is fully capable of having 20 tabs open but that just seems completely stupid. There's a thing called bookmarks. It allows you to reference a site without loading it.
The internet is open to any machine but that doesn't mean most websites owners or even software developers are going to care about people stuck in the past by over 10 years.
So you expect your machine to stay in the past by 12 years while being able to use current software on it? I just don't get why you should expect people to put effort into making a free product support something that Microsoft doesn't support.
Firefox 3.6 will continue to work on the web. It may not work perfectly but it works so if you want to stay in the past you can but buying an extra 512 meg of ram and putting XP on it is a trivial and cheap task.
So 3.6 is now good with memory? There is nothing 3.6 offers that is better than the current release. Some people just hate change so much and expect the world to cater to their backwards ways. Well, tough luck. There is no reason to stay on firefox 3.6.
If it plays all the same games then it's nothing more than a Windows PC so it has to some how make windows more friendly for consoles while allowing it to be open enough to install Origin on it which rumours say you'll be able to do.
Anyone can apparently make their own hardware which all sounds nice but what's the stop companies from starting a hardware battle to try and either get a power advantage or price advantage and again you don't get any real benefits of the console environment.
They're also dependant on Microsoft for windows who isn't going to be happy if it eats into their 360 market and let\s face it, it'll eat into Microsoft's marketshare more than Nintendo's marketshare.
Valve rarely fucks up but my concern is that this is the first time they will. If it can play all my existing games then it's a windows PC dressed up as a console. At worst that means you get all the hassle of PC gaming with the lock down of console gaming. At best it's just a windows PC in a customised case.
Either way I can't see the point of it. Steam works fine as is on HDTVs. If people want to do that they can do it already.
What is stopping you from creating your own "steam box" now? Valve is developing a big screen mode for the whole purpose of being about to build your own steam box. But as someone who already uses Steam on a 40" HDTV it works fine as is imo.
I think there are going to be a lot of kids that are butt hurt when they lose access to all their Xbox / PS3 DLC shortly after the next generation systems come out.
I think it's the high dependence on gas and the refusal to pay anything but the minimum that causes the spikes. Where is the incentive for me, if I were a gas company, not to fuck you over? What are you going to do about it? Vote in a republican who claims he can make prices lower only to be bought by me after he gets in? I wish more voters would realise that, as you say, gas prices go up whether or not you vote democrat. The idea that republicans will lower gas prices is laughable.
Plus with a lot of the price being tax in europe the government can easily stabilize prices by removing tax in accordance with actual price rises. They of course don't always do (it'd be a nightmare to adjust it with every rise anyway) but it has happened.
And they should be grateful they've ended up with a public transportation infrastructure so they're not so dependant on cars and effected by huge price spikes in fuel because they have no other option.
I'm sure they'll lose sleep over family not buying a PS4. No one used the feature so they did not to support it and guess what, the PS3 still managed to catch right up to the 360 so it would appear they didn't upset too many people over.
They do need to make a profit but I think the whole raspberry pi process has been a bit of a cock-up I can't say I would have done better but I think they made some poor decisions along the way and the happy attitude didn't help after hearing about delay after delay. I wish them success and I will buy one but the enthusiasm for it has worn off some time ago and I don't mind waiting a couple months for things to die down.
Why should someone be able to clone anyone's software and cause user confusion? From the sounds of it they just don't want it looking the same. I think that's a reasonable request.
It never made that statement because it would have been false. It did have PC talk about 14,000+ Windows viruses which are harmless to Mac so, at best, it implied, Mac is immune to Window's viruses but that's about it.
And the fact is Macs aren't as insecure. Is that because they're unix based or because they're not as popular? It doesn't really, matter, they are generally more secure and generally require user stupidity which no system is invulnerable against and that is why they would never say the Mac is immune to virus threats.
Give the crap that I hear kids spewing on the train or bus his point still applies to teenagers. Some are technically inclined and some are as dim, when it comes to computers, as my parents.
It's open source. Feel free to maintain something no one really cares for and merge Apples stuff back into the Linux stuff. Who the hell print paper these days anyway? That's like expecting someone to apply for a job via a hard copy of your CV and an application form. This isn't 1809. We've moved past that.
I'd hardly consider it a standard when it development died shortly after it became a standard and IE is the only one to implement it.
The flaw has been known since at least 2010 and in fact when it was pointed out that even Microsoft was passing invalid codes on their own support site. Some people get such a hard-on for ripping on Google that they're willing to defend MS as the good guy despite implementing something that was completely broken and never offered any protection.
Google certainly is not perfect but MS is the one that is at fault here and they just look desperate by pointing out that Google (like many people including themselves) have by passed their failed privacy protection.
Slashdot Mirror
PHP is like a poo someone took on your carpet. But then they feel that wasn't enough and ejaculate on their poo or in the case of PHP add multiple inheritance.
Of all the things that should be fixed in PHP the lack of inheritance was not one of those things.
My machine is fully capable of having 20 tabs open but that just seems completely stupid. There's a thing called bookmarks. It allows you to reference a site without loading it.
The internet is open to any machine but that doesn't mean most websites owners or even software developers are going to care about people stuck in the past by over 10 years.
So you expect your machine to stay in the past by 12 years while being able to use current software on it? I just don't get why you should expect people to put effort into making a free product support something that Microsoft doesn't support.
Firefox 3.6 will continue to work on the web. It may not work perfectly but it works so if you want to stay in the past you can but buying an extra 512 meg of ram and putting XP on it is a trivial and cheap task.
So 3.6 is now good with memory? There is nothing 3.6 offers that is better than the current release. Some people just hate change so much and expect the world to cater to their backwards ways. Well, tough luck. There is no reason to stay on firefox 3.6.
If it plays all the same games then it's nothing more than a Windows PC so it has to some how make windows more friendly for consoles while allowing it to be open enough to install Origin on it which rumours say you'll be able to do.
Anyone can apparently make their own hardware which all sounds nice but what's the stop companies from starting a hardware battle to try and either get a power advantage or price advantage and again you don't get any real benefits of the console environment.
They're also dependant on Microsoft for windows who isn't going to be happy if it eats into their 360 market and let\s face it, it'll eat into Microsoft's marketshare more than Nintendo's marketshare.
It'll be, at best, a niche product, imo.
Valve rarely fucks up but my concern is that this is the first time they will. If it can play all my existing games then it's a windows PC dressed up as a console. At worst that means you get all the hassle of PC gaming with the lock down of console gaming. At best it's just a windows PC in a customised case.
Either way I can't see the point of it. Steam works fine as is on HDTVs. If people want to do that they can do it already.
What is stopping you from creating your own "steam box" now? Valve is developing a big screen mode for the whole purpose of being about to build your own steam box. But as someone who already uses Steam on a 40" HDTV it works fine as is imo.
Because there are so many brand new games with tons of mod tools and an open source engines.
lol math is for nerds
I think there are going to be a lot of kids that are butt hurt when they lose access to all their Xbox / PS3 DLC shortly after the next generation systems come out.
I think it's the high dependence on gas and the refusal to pay anything but the minimum that causes the spikes. Where is the incentive for me, if I were a gas company, not to fuck you over? What are you going to do about it? Vote in a republican who claims he can make prices lower only to be bought by me after he gets in? I wish more voters would realise that, as you say, gas prices go up whether or not you vote democrat. The idea that republicans will lower gas prices is laughable.
Plus with a lot of the price being tax in europe the government can easily stabilize prices by removing tax in accordance with actual price rises. They of course don't always do (it'd be a nightmare to adjust it with every rise anyway) but it has happened.
And they should be grateful they've ended up with a public transportation infrastructure so they're not so dependant on cars and effected by huge price spikes in fuel because they have no other option.
At least it's not PHP but I hope they make it clear to people that good programming languages don't have as many flaws as JavaScript does.
I'm sure they'll lose sleep over family not buying a PS4. No one used the feature so they did not to support it and guess what, the PS3 still managed to catch right up to the 360 so it would appear they didn't upset too many people over.
And downtime didn't exist when people ran their own hardware?
They do need to make a profit but I think the whole raspberry pi process has been a bit of a cock-up I can't say I would have done better but I think they made some poor decisions along the way and the happy attitude didn't help after hearing about delay after delay. I wish them success and I will buy one but the enthusiasm for it has worn off some time ago and I don't mind waiting a couple months for things to die down.
Yeah I'm sure RS and Farnell have much more server capacity than Apple.
They generally get away with anything so why not do what you want?
Why should someone be able to clone anyone's software and cause user confusion? From the sounds of it they just don't want it looking the same. I think that's a reasonable request.
It never made that statement because it would have been false. It did have PC talk about 14,000+ Windows viruses which are harmless to Mac so, at best, it implied, Mac is immune to Window's viruses but that's about it.
And the fact is Macs aren't as insecure. Is that because they're unix based or because they're not as popular? It doesn't really, matter, they are generally more secure and generally require user stupidity which no system is invulnerable against and that is why they would never say the Mac is immune to virus threats.
Give the crap that I hear kids spewing on the train or bus his point still applies to teenagers. Some are technically inclined and some are as dim, when it comes to computers, as my parents.
It's open source. Feel free to maintain something no one really cares for and merge Apples stuff back into the Linux stuff. Who the hell print paper these days anyway? That's like expecting someone to apply for a job via a hard copy of your CV and an application form. This isn't 1809. We've moved past that.
Not everyone is cool enough to have a hard-on over such rules every day of the school week.
I'd hardly consider it a standard when it development died shortly after it became a standard and IE is the only one to implement it.
The flaw has been known since at least 2010 and in fact when it was pointed out that even Microsoft was passing invalid codes on their own support site. Some people get such a hard-on for ripping on Google that they're willing to defend MS as the good guy despite implementing something that was completely broken and never offered any protection.
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/17/a-loophole-big-enough-for-a-cookie-to-fit-through/
Google certainly is not perfect but MS is the one that is at fault here and they just look desperate by pointing out that Google (like many people including themselves) have by passed their failed privacy protection.