Slashdot Mirror


User: dr80085

dr80085's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
10
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 10

  1. Re:He will just have to.. on False Fact On Wikipedia Proves Itself · · Score: 1

    When I first read the title that's just what I thought he'd gone and done...

  2. Re:stupid idea on Security Checkpoints Predict What You Will Do · · Score: 1

    Also, any checkpoint will provide a crowd of unsecured people waiting to enter - perfect for a terrorist to attack.

  3. Re:Does that mean.... on Australian Judge Rules Simpsons Cartoon Rip-off Is Child Porn · · Score: 1

    Likewise ;) I thought I was all over the olympics. Bring 'em on! And the T-shirts!

  4. Re:Simpsons Movie on Australian Judge Rules Simpsons Cartoon Rip-off Is Child Porn · · Score: 1

    Even children's books with cartoons of high art containing rude bits are not allowed in the USA.
    http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/0,1518,493856,00.html

  5. Re:I wouldn't hold my breath on Time To Discuss Drug Prohibition? · · Score: 1

    The war on drugs makes a lot of money for a lot people on both sides of the law.

    This is the reason those in power on both sides want it to continue ad infinitum, not unlike the war on terror. It's up to us who have a valuable little to gain to fight against the incumbents who have a _lot_ to lose, and so will fight nail and tooth.

    From the post:

    Some opponents of prohibition pointed to Al Capone and increasing crime, violence and corruption. Others were troubled by the labeling of tens of millions of Americans as criminals, overflowing prisons, and the consequent broadening of disrespect for the law. Americans were disquieted by dangerous expansions of federal police powers, encroachments on individual liberties, increasing government expenditure devoted to enforcing the prohibition laws, and the billions in forgone tax revenues. And still others were disturbed by the specter of so many citizens blinded, paralyzed and killed by poisonous moonshine and industrial alcohol.

  6. Re:Um, it's not pornography on UK ISPs Are Censoring Wikipedia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is all quite reminiscent of the recent hoo-haa concerning Australian photographer Bill Henson's photographs of girls.

    http://www.roslynoxley9.com.au/artists/18/Bill_Henson/
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Henson
    http://www.billhenson.net.au/

    The worrying thing is that the Prime Minister Kevin Rudd thought they were despicable, without actually seeing them.
    Doesn't bode so well for Australia...

  7. Re:Let's have a closer look on UK ISPs Are Censoring Wikipedia · · Score: 1

    The censorship is especially ridiculous when the first section of the article discusses the history of the choice of cover art, the concerns the band members had with the image (and indeed the lyrics themselves), and what they claim is the true meaning of the lyrics "Time is the virgin killer".

  8. Re:What about heredity? on Cold Sore Virus May Be Alzheimer's Smoking Gun · · Score: 1

    The cause of Alzheimers is not understood very well at all. There are however many factors which appear to make one more likely to develop the disease. Being infected with the herpes virus that causes cold sores is one of these. If you get cold sores, your risk of developing Alzheimers is not that much increased, and anyway, there's not much you can do about it. If you don't get cold sores, of course don't go out of your way to catch them. However, I'd say the cold sores themselves are much more of a worry/hassle than an increased risk of Alzheimers.

  9. Re:Protest site on Wiretapping Law Sparks Rage In Sweden · · Score: 1

    "integritetsintrång"
    "invasion of privacy"

    "utredningsbegäran"
    "investigation request"

    "åsiktsregistrering"
    "personal opinion database"
  10. Re:Trying to regulate every little thing is stupid on Climate Change Finally Impacts Important Industry · · Score: 1

    Seriously, that line of reasoning will kill braincells of rational people trying to follow it. It's the same thing as saying that because the current global ecosystem is unable to sustain the current population of white rhinos, what we should do is "humanely" drop their population to 10% of today's so that they can each have plenty of resources. That is rather different. White rhinos are not using their environment unsustainably, but humans clearly are. I'm sure if rhinos could burn fuel to make their lives more pleasant in the short term they would, but they don't seem to have cottoned on to that one yet.