Slashdot Mirror


Cold Sore Virus May Be Alzheimer's Smoking Gun

Science Daily is reporting that the virus behind cold sores has been found to be a major cause of the insoluble protein plaques found in the brains of Alzheimer's disease sufferers. Researchers believe the herpes simplex virus is a significant factor in developing the debilitating disease and could be treated by antiviral agents such as acyclovir, which is already used to treat cold sores and other diseases caused by the herpes virus. Another future possibility is vaccination against the virus to prevent the development of Alzheimer's in the first place. The research was just published in the Journal of Pathology (abstract).

285 comments

  1. I may have herpes but at least I don't have herpes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just lost my train of thought.

  2. Strange... by Der+Huhn+Teufel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man my mouth hurts but I don't remember why.

    1. Re:Strange... by MarkRose · · Score: 3, Funny

      You coded in brainfuck without a condom and got cerebral herpes, obviously.

      --
      Be relentless!
    2. Re:Strange... by TeXMaster · · Score: 1

      That's why he whistles on it, you insensitve clod!

      That should probably read âoeyou insensitive coldâ.

      --
      "I'm never quite so stupid as when I'm being smart" (Linus van Pelt)
    3. Re:Strange... by etnoy · · Score: 1

      That's why he whistles on it, you insensitve clod!

      That should probably read âoeyou insensitive coldâ.

      That should probably read "you insensitive cold!"

      --
      Quantum hacker.
    4. Re:Strange... by KermodeBear · · Score: 0, Redundant

      For those who don't know, the above comment is in reference to the programming language Brainfuck.

      --
      Love sees no species.
    5. Re:Strange... by ChrisMP1 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the information, Sherlock.

      --
      <sig>&nbsp;</sig>
    6. Re:Strange... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      For those that don't know Sherlock (full name Sherlock Holmes) was an investigative detective from stores by Arthur Conan Doyle found here Sherlock Holmes

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    7. Re:Strange... by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't happen to be from the Terrace area, would you?

      --
      Be relentless!
    8. Re:Strange... by SeattleGameboy · · Score: 1

      Yes, Abercrombie & Fitch used to be Abercrombie, Fitch, and Doyle...

    9. Re:Strange... by TeXMaster · · Score: 1

      That's why he whistles on it, you insensitve clod!

      That should probably read âoeyou insensitive coldâ.

      That should probably read "you insensitive cold!"

      True. Also, /. should support UTF-8.

      --
      "I'm never quite so stupid as when I'm being smart" (Linus van Pelt)
  3. What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Alzheimers runs in families, which is particularly worrisome for me since I have it on both sides of my family. If it is caused by a virus, then why is it passed down in genes? Are some people more sucseptible to this virus, thus there is a gene for vulnerabilty to this virus, instead of a gene for Alzheimers??

    1. Re:What about heredity? by compro01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or "virus only does this to people with gene X".

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:What about heredity? by BeanThere · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the article: "The team had discovered much earlier that the virus is present in brains of many elderly people and that in those people with a specific genetic factor, there is a high risk of developing Alzheimer's disease."

    3. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you live together as a family even for the most briefest of time, wouldn't you think the virus could be transmitted easily?

      Also if your mom has it, there are lots of fluids passed between one another during the pregnancy and childbirth. And if your father had it, he would have infected your mother when he impregnated her.

    4. Re:What about heredity? by Courageous · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're an AC so prolly won't see this response, but Herpes infection is endemic. I believe that 90% of all adults are infected with the virus that causes Herpes. I know this is confusing, because of the confusion with genital herpes, which can be caused by at least two variants of the Herpes virus.

      C//

    5. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another possibility is that the virus is more likely to trigger the Alzheimer's response in people with certain genetic factors. Either way, reducing the prevalence of herpes in the population will help.

    6. Re:What about heredity? by spectecjr · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes. There's a gene called APOE-1. If you have a specific form of that gene, you're more susceptible.

      Also, herpes immunity varies from person to person. Babies without any of the immunity typically die shortly after birth. Your immunity varies depending on a specific combination of genes.

      I've been researching this stuff for a while... Inferring results from about 500 different medical papers I've read, Herpes viruses are responsible for:

      Alzheimer's Disease
      Type-II Diabetes
      High Cholesterol, including high HDL and high triglyceride levels
      Heart disease, including atherosclerosis (aka arteriosclerosis)
      Cancer of the gallbladder (cholangiocarcinoma)
      Colon cancer
      Crohn's disease
      Multiple sclerosis
      Rheumatoid arthritis
      Arthritis
      Osteoporosis
      Multiple myeloma
      Glioblastoma multiforme
      Bipolar disorder
      Schizophrenia
      Hodkin's Disease
      Lymphoma
      Breast Cancer
      Kaposi's Sarcoma

      http://www.accidentalscientist.com/2008/01/public-enemy-1-herpes-viruses-as.html

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    7. Re:What about heredity? by similar_name · · Score: 5, Informative

      I believe that 90% of all adults are infected with the virus that causes Herpes.

      Yep, Herpes comes in at least 8 varieties in humans and over 80 in the animal kingdom. So if you've ever had chicken pox...

      "Chickenpox is a highly communicable disease caused by the varicella virus, a member of the herpes virus family"

      New York State Department of Health

    8. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the original article is true, my guess is that it runs in families because parents pass the virus onto their children. Parents kiss their kids, share glasses with them, etc. so it seems like it would be fairly easy to pass the virus onto them too.

    9. Re:What about heredity? by Burnhard · · Score: 1

      That's true. Some of us may be carriers but never show symptoms (I've never had a cold-sore but am pretty certain I must have been exposed by now!). None of my grandparents have had Alzheimer's, but one of them currently has Vascular Dementia, which is also common but unrelated.

    10. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you have been exposed doesn't mean you are a carrier. You're exposed to lots of viruses all the time and most often your body fights them off immediately or they don't even get into you in the first place. Our bodies are tougher than what some people seem to think (why else do you think we have survived this long).

    11. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's the great thing about statistics, if 90% of adults have it then a 100% of all people will die with it and some prematurely. Unless there's a factor that stands out the numbers can be spun to back most agendas. Unless they find that Alzheimer's is rare to nonextistent in people that don't have the herpes virus then it's hard to confirm anything when 90% of the population has it. Even then given the fact everyone for the most part are exposed to it an immunity to herpes might also protect you from other conditions that cause Alzheimer's. Odds are we'll never know unless some one comes up with an antiviral that will kill herpes.

    12. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you live together as a family even for the most briefest of time, wouldn't you think the virus could be transmitted easily?

      Also if your mom has it, there are lots of fluids passed between one another during the pregnancy and childbirth. And if your father had it, he would have infected your mother when he impregnated her.

      A lot of fluids? No. There is a reason that only 25% of children born from HIV infected mothers also are infected by HIV. In fact, the probability of being infected with HIV is higher from breastfeeding than it is from gestation and birth. Study human biology buddy. The placenta develops for a reason.

    13. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Babies without any of the immunity typically die shortly after birth

      Not exactly. All babies are born with immature immune systems, and those that are infected at birth do very badly.

      Better re-read your 500 papers.

    14. Re:What about heredity? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Is Epstein-Barr a herpes virus? Because that is the only virus I have ever heard has had any link identified to Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    15. Re:What about heredity? by KermodeBear · · Score: 1

      I read your posts and found them to be very interesting and informative. I'd like to see more, when you have the time to write them. Thanks.

      --
      Love sees no species.
    16. Re:What about heredity? by Khaed · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, it is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epstein-Barr

      "The Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), also called Human herpesvirus 4 (HHV-4), is a virus of the herpes family (which includes Herpes simplex virus), and is one of the most common viruses in humans."

      The herpes family of viruses is certainly one of the most "successful." It's everywhere.

    17. Re:What about heredity? by reverius · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    18. Re:What about heredity? by osu-neko · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Rule of thumb: When someone is trying to explain the "cause" of something, and they have mentioned less than a dozen different things, they're oversimplifying.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    19. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From this source, http://www.herpes.com/hsv1-2.html

      80-90% of people age 50 have HSV1.

      From the story above, 90% of those with Alzheimer's have HSV1.

      What is the average age of people with Alzheimer's? 65 or so?
      Plus HSV1 resides in nerve cells.

      I don't know about you, but I don't think finding HSV1 in 90% of those with Alzheimer's is really any different than what would be expected in the general population around age 65.

    20. Re:What about heredity? by repapetilto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From your part 3: Apparently HPV does its magic by interfering with the expression of gene P52, a factor in cell death (apoptosis)... Most likely you meant p53, just sayin.

    21. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The virus is passed at birth from mother to child.

    22. Re:What about heredity? by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      HSV I and HSV II (cold sores and herpes) are actually passed extremely easily by skin-to-skin contact. Condoms are not actually that great a way to protect against them. So they are very easy (well, cold sores anyway) to get from someone in your family even if you don't have sex with any of them.

      It's estimated that between 60% and 80% of the US population has HSV I.

      There is apparently also an additional genetic factor.

    23. Re:What about heredity? by lbbros · · Score: 2, Informative

      Alzheimer's Disease is what is being called a "multi-factorial" disease. That means that there isn't a single source of the disease, but rather a combination of them. In this case, the presence of the herpes virus is one of such factors. I've read and researched a bit myself on the subject during the course of my scientific career: there are loads of papers that try to link particular genetic patterns to susceptibility to AD, but aside for APOE (mentioned by another poster) and some familial forms (which are a minorty among AD cases), the findings are often hard to reproduce, or even inconsistent among them. BTW, regarding the herpes virus: you don't quite eradicate it when you get a cold sore and treat it, because in fact it usually lies in a dormant state after the acute phase (IIRC, I haven't touched virology in a long time and I may be totally incorrect) and factors such as stress or other events can "awaken" it again, causing the recurrences in cold sores and other herpes-related infections.

      --
      A CC-licensed illustrated horror novel
    24. Re:What about heredity? by TerranFury · · Score: 5, Informative

      I believe that 90% of all adults are infected with the virus that causes Herpes. I know this is confusing, because of the confusion with genital herpes,

      There are two types of herpes simplex virus: HSV-1 and HSV-2. Historically, HSV-1 has been called "oral herpes" and HSV-2 "genital herpes." But in fact, either can infect either location -- or other locations -- and both cause similar symptoms. (In industrialized nations, particularly among college students, most new cases of genital herpes are actually HSV-1. Ah, fellatio!)

      Statistics: 50% of adults are seropositive for HSV-1. 25% of adults are seropositive for HSV-2.

    25. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Please note that a virus transcripts its genetic material into the host cell's genetic sequence in order to reproduce. There is a very high probability that sometimes transcripted viral DNA or RNA sequences can remain dormant. Some biologists go so far as to even suggest that a significant portion of our DNA structure is caused by this phenomenon.

      Herpes virii remain dormant while transcripted into a nerve cell's DNA, and are brought out of this dormancy whenever the host's immune system is compromised (ie, cold or flu, hence the likage of this outbreak with the cold or flu that the person suffered from in the first place, naming the herpes labiolis as a "cold sore"). It would not be a far stretch to discover that this could be a moer systemic infection, rather than localized to just the region of outbreak, and that, over time, the entier nervous system could be affected.

    26. Re:What about heredity? by endothermicnuke · · Score: 1

      HSV-1 is transmitted by shared towels, utensils and kissing on the lips. That's why even children can get HSV-1.

    27. Re:What about heredity? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know another great thing about statistics? People who know what they're doing can also use them to make meaningful calculations about the way things work in the real world. 90% vs 10% is an unbalanced sample, sure, but there are more than enough people in that 10% to make it a large enough sample size to calculate a meaningful odds ratio.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    28. Re:What about heredity? by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      also, regarding the following:

      "2. With the sheer number of cells in the human body, late-stage diseases such as cancer should always occur in childhood
      Your body contains billions upon billions of cells, all replicating, all exposed to free radicals. Except during breastfeeding, your food supply doesn't change much through adulthood. Antioxidants, vitamins, etc, which protect cells should always affect you the same way - you shouldn't need more protection as you get older. It's a limited supply, that needs to be replenished regularly.
      If you're going to see problems with replication, or other random malfunctions, then they should be as likely when you're young as when you get older. If you're going to get them when you're older, you should get them at the end of puberty if there's any magic involved in still being a child."

      ---I don't follow this logic at all. Even if the rate of cancer-inducing mutations/epigenetic changes is constant the incidence of cancer should rise exponentially in relation to age since more and more of those mutations will have occurred as time passed.

    29. Re:What about heredity? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      There could be multiple causes.

      I.E. Some viruses may be among the possible causes. There may be other causes, of course, even if one is discovered, it is difficult to rule out the possibility that other things may be causing or have caused the same disease.

      Genetics may make you more or less susceptible to a virus also.

    30. Re:What about heredity? by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

      Maybe .. herpes is passed down?

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    31. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just in: family members, who spend lots of time in each others' presence, might share pathogens. More details at 11

    32. Re:What about heredity? by Anachragnome · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was just relating this post to my wife when she said "I wonder, if all that is true, if it is possible the vaccinations we all receive for chickenpox might actually be the root cause of all these diseases".

      Then I made another realization. Many of these diseases seem to be more prevalent then they have been in the past, that is to say that a higher percentage of the population are afflicted with these conditions then they used to be. Could the increase in these diseases correspond to the increases in vaccinating the public?

      Holy smokes. Are we inadvertently introducing a weakness to all these other diseases?

    33. Re:What about heredity? by rivetgeek · · Score: 1

      It's possible that it only seems to run in families because families tend to share drinks or other objects. There could also be a hereditary gene that increases susceptibility to this particular disease but that it requires the herpes virus to trigger it

    34. Re:What about heredity? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Many of the diseases that are more common now affect relatively old people. If you have a disease that rarely kills anyone under the age of 40, you will have seen a marked increase in it over the last hundred years or so.

      Several forms of cancer are good examples of this. They are a lot more prevalent now than a century ago because few people lived long enough to develop them to a fatal degree. When comparing infection statistics, also compare age ranges. If diseases are more common in the 30-40 age range than they were, then you might want to worry.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    35. Re:What about heredity? by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that make it pandemic? Endemic is something specific to a confined location or population.

    36. Re:What about heredity? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Well, if your mom and dad both gets cold sores, odds are you do too.

      Even if you're not symptomatic, you might still have the virus.

      Hmm. Maybe you are symptomatic, but the sores are in your brain instead of on your lips.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    37. Re:What about heredity? by Jorophose · · Score: 4, Funny

      But House only does it with four!

    38. Re:What about heredity? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I think he was refering to a population of one, the infected person,

      In epidemiology, an infection is said to be endemic (from Greek en- in or within + demos people) in a population when that infection is maintained in the population without the need for external inputs Endemic (epidemiology)

      Such as the infected remains infected without symptoms which may periodicaly reocure without addition external exposure to the HSV.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    39. Re:What about heredity? by iago12345 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Its true currently an average of 50% of adults are seropositive for HSV1, but as an individual statistics state 80% - 85% of people over the age of 60 are infected, so odds are slim you will avoid being inflicted with the HSV1 virus (cold sores)before you die. However with the advances being made in understanding the virus' ability to reactivate and stay hidden, drugs will most likely be developed within the next ten years that destroy the virus' ability to replicate making it almost entirely non-contagious, and within twenty years we'll have a technique/drug that will be capable of killing it where it hides in the trigeminal ganglion located in the brain, which extends to the face/lips. However newer research is indicating that not just HSV1, but a large host of viruses previously thought to be harmless (such as other members of the HSV family Cytomegalovirus & Epstein-Barr virus) eventually cause build up of plaque in the brain causing cognitive decline, particularly combined with the ApoE4 gene variation, which I believe this study linking HSV1 & Alzheimer's is referring to. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/541533 http://genome.wellcome.ac.uk/doc_WTX038956.html

    40. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, seriously? You actually have to ask?

      The difference between a virus and bacteria is that bacteria are actual separate entities from your bodies own cells. The way in which a virus works is to inject its own - fake - genetic code (DNA, or actually, RNA, the blueprint used by cells to create DNA) into your bodies cells. This is why viral infections are so much harder to fight than bacterial infections - you must kill your own cells containing the bad RNA to destroy the virus. The treatment for cancer, which is caused by mutations in the so-called "onco gene" (hence oncology, oncoligist, etc.) works along the same basis, except with cancer the problem is so widespread, even when detected early, pills can't effectively kill it faster than it spreads, hence we have kemo and radiation therapy.

      Either way, if your parents have or have had herpes, then yes, it can be passed down genetically. Herpes simplex is easy to live with for many, many years without even knowing you have it or displaying any obvious symptoms in some people, so your parents could have it, and it being a virus, pass it down to you.

    41. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but only in Arkansas.

    42. Re:What about heredity? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      So if you've been screwing them all you most definitely have it by now, huh?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    43. Re:What about heredity? by Strep · · Score: 1

      A factor in being a successful virus is that it shouldn't kill off its host too quickly or at all.

    44. Re:What about heredity? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      TFA mentioned that there was a large amount of HSV1 DNA in the specific lesions and less found elsewhere, not conclusive proof in it's self but highly suggestive.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    45. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The placenta develops for a reason.

      To reduce the risk of overpopulation by encouraging men never to have sex ever ever again?

    46. Re:What about heredity? by schon · · Score: 0, Troll

      Many of the diseases that are more common now affect relatively old people. If you have a disease that rarely kills anyone under the age of 40, you will have seen a marked increase in it over the last hundred years or so.

      Why is that exactly? Are you one of those people who failed math and therefore doesn't understand the difference between median and mean?

      Several forms of cancer are good examples of this. They are a lot more prevalent now than a century ago because few people lived long enough to develop them to a fatal degree.

      Yup, looks like you failed math alright.

      Allow me to ask you some questions:

      Assume 50% of a population dies before they turn 2 years old. Assume the other 50% die at age 60. What is the average (mean) life exepctancy?

      Now, 100 years later, only 1% die before they turn two, and 99% die at age 60. What is the average (mean) life expectancy?

      Now, if your "magic" age is 40, and the only contributing factor is age, what percentage of the adult population (in each instance) will contract cancer?

      If you get different answers for each group, you still fail, and need to go back to the beginning.

    47. Re:What about heredity? by Rayban · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's not Lupus.

      --
      æeee!
    48. Re:What about heredity? by Ironica · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow, that's a really interesting list. Partly because many of those items are *also* linked to autoimmune responses to gluten in the human diet. In particular, diabetes (Types I and II), Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, Rheumatoid arthritis, and colon cancer have been clinically confirmed to my knowledge; I also know of people with MS and Crohn's who find that going gluten-free improved their condition a great deal.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    49. Re:What about heredity? by dr80085 · · Score: 1

      The cause of Alzheimers is not understood very well at all. There are however many factors which appear to make one more likely to develop the disease. Being infected with the herpes virus that causes cold sores is one of these. If you get cold sores, your risk of developing Alzheimers is not that much increased, and anyway, there's not much you can do about it. If you don't get cold sores, of course don't go out of your way to catch them. However, I'd say the cold sores themselves are much more of a worry/hassle than an increased risk of Alzheimers.

    50. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > I've been researching this stuff for a while... Inferring results
      > from about 500 different medical papers I've read, Herpes viruses
      > are responsible for:
      > ...
      > Multiple sclerosis
      > ...

      As a person who gets cold sores and has also been diagnosed with MS, I
      always sort of wondered if there was any sort of causative relationship
      between the two, with the herpes virus somehow being a common factor.

      As long as I can remember, I used to always suffer from
      frequent, big, and painful cold sores. When I was 20, I started
      getting MS symptoms. When I was on Avonex, I was still experiencing
      bouts of optic neuritis with gradually increasing
      scotoma, and I still got cold sores.

      The optic neuritis and increasing scotoma stopped cold in their tracks
      when I switched medications to Rebif... as did my cold sores. Of
      course, it could simply be a coincidence, but I would be interested in
      getting a more informed opinion on the matter (maybe even a study, but
      from what I understand it is not easy to come by the cash for random
      studies like this when it comes to MS). Some publications I have found
      that I find interesting include:

      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7553233?dopt=Abstract

      http://jvi.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/JVI.01649-07v1

      Of course, I want to see something more rigorous and objective (i.e.,
      not my own anecdotal confirmation bias) to justify my conjectured link
      between the two.

    51. Re:What about heredity? by Ironica · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Holy smokes. Are we inadvertently introducing a weakness to all these other diseases?

      That's one of the main considerations of families who opt to selectively vaccinate or not vaccinate at all. While many (but not ALL) of the vaccinations on the CDC schedule have proven effectiveness in combating disease, there is *no* clinical evidence that the existing schedule (starting at two months of age with four shots, which carry a combined punch of 13 different disease strains) has any benefit over a schedule which starts later or goes slower.

      To run with varicella as one example, scientists have already speculated that the recent surge in shingles diagnoses is related to the varicella vaccination. The speculation is that our immune systems get a "refresher course" in supressing the varicella virus each time we come in contact with it... but now that most kids are vaccinated, it's really rare to come in contact with it, so it's easier for the virus to reappear as shingles in adults who had chicken pox as children.

      There's also not much known about what's going to happen throughout adulthood to kids who are vaccinated from it. The vaccine loses effectiveness after 10-12 years in most people, which means that kids become susceptible again at the beginning of the teen years... when the virus switches from "annoying as heck" to "possibly causing permanent damage to fertility."

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    52. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When children are particularly young, mothers often kiss their kids. If the mother has oral herpes, you might expect the kids to get it too. In such a case it would have little to do with genes.

    53. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you know any folks who have Shingles, it is also caused by the same Herpes virus that causes chicken pox.

    54. Re:What about heredity? by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't believe that would appreciably increase your chances. So, it would depend more on whether or not they had it if you had sex or not.

    55. Re:What about heredity? by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      If there's one thing I have learned about science, it is that there's never an either-or in biology and related subjects. Everything is a matter of degree. Biological systems are analog and full of control loops.
      So, I'll bet the answer is that there's some susceptibility to plaque buildup (several mutations that affect the structure of beta amyloid and related proteins as well as the garbage collection by glia cells) and some to herpes infections (immune system status in general.) The more of both you have the earlier you'll get it. And, OBTW, nutrition seems to have something to do with it too. Junk food bad, caffeine good, which makes me think that we're looking at low level inflammatory processes like in atherosclerosis.

    56. Re:What about heredity? by spectecjr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ---I don't follow this logic at all. Even if the rate of cancer-inducing mutations/epigenetic changes is constant the incidence of cancer should rise exponentially in relation to age since more and more of those mutations will have occurred as time passed.

      Mainly that the rate of cell division actually drops significantly as you get older. As my GP says, fetal cells replicate so fast that they're pretty much just happy bouncing baby tumors. So if mutations are the cause of it all, surely those mutations should occur more frequently when cell division is at its highest?

      If it's cell division and the consequent errors which cause it, then surely skin cancer, colon cancer and bone marrow cancer should be the most frequent? (After all, these cells all divide continuously). However, breast cancer and prostate cancer are more common. (Prostate cancer has been shown to have some connection to a mouse-xenotropic retrovirus in some studies; it's amazing what we can find now we have the tech to find viral particles directly in tissue samples using virion assays).

      Similarly, if it's just replication errors which are the issue, then consider how many cells are in the human body. Surely those replication errors should be much more prevalent.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    57. Re:What about heredity? by spectecjr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From your part 3: Apparently HPV does its magic by interfering with the expression of gene P52, a factor in cell death (apoptosis)... Most likely you meant p53, just sayin.

      I understand where you're coming from, but p52 is also an apoptosis mediator.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    58. Re:What about heredity? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      HSV I and HSV II (cold sores and herpes) are actually passed extremely easily by skin-to-skin contact. Condoms are not actually that great a way to protect against them.

      Hah, so cunnilingus with give you brain rot* with or without a dental dam.

      So all you suckers that used 'em are screwed too.

      * Assuming you have the gene that makes you susceptible

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    59. Re:What about heredity? by spectecjr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow, that's a really interesting list. Partly because many of those items are *also* linked to autoimmune responses to gluten in the human diet. In particular, diabetes (Types I and II), Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, Rheumatoid arthritis, and colon cancer have been clinically confirmed to my knowledge; I also know of people with MS and Crohn's who find that going gluten-free improved their condition a great deal.

      I've got an idea about that... You might want to check and see if there's also any connection to peanut allergies and those conditions, reason being that both wheat germ and peanuts have a high arginine-lysine ratio, which encourages herpes replication.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    60. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an AC so prolly won't see this response, but Herpes infection is endemic.

      There is nothing about being "AC" that prevents one from seeing a response. In point of fact, a bookmark - easily deleted and only visited at my convenience - is less annoying than a string of emails.

    61. Re:What about heredity? by repapetilto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But cells with "good" DNA can divide all they want without causing cancer, since they will only do so when the proper signal to do so is present. As you age more and more of your cells will have errors in their DNA (for the reason stated above) that cause them to divide irrespective of whatever external or internal signals to divide or kill themselves. These mutations aren't necessarily the result of faulty DNA replication but can be caused by environmental factors damaging the DNA in a way that isn't repaired correctly which, if it happens at the wrong spot(s), results in altered expression of genes involved in regulating cell proliferation or apoptosis, thus allowing that cell to become cancerous. So what I'm saying is that replication errors aren't the only cause of changes to DNA sequence (your viral theory is an example of this...).

      Also the logic behind thinking that more innately proliferative cells are more prone to cancer is also two-fold in that the more times a cell divides the more replications the original DNA will have undergone thus allowing more chances for error (what you seemed to be thinking about) but also DNA packed tightly in heterochromatin is less available to react with whatever chemicals are around to alter it. S-phase DNA is necessarily more exposed to whatever random chemicals are floating around in the nucleus and, throughout the cell cycle, highly-proliferative cells will have those cell division/apoptosis regulating genes more exposed so that they can be easily accessed for transcription and since those genes are normally more active fewer mutations may be unnecessary before you end up with a cell that just grows out of control. Those obviously aren't the only factors though, since, as you say, how often a cell ends up with cancerous progeny isn't necessarily related to how often it normally divides. Maybe it has something to do with accessibility of those tissues to carcinogens or that the ability of the body to detect the faulty cell and/or mount an effective immune response differs by tissue...I don't know, maybe someone has studied it.

      Anyway I guess what I'm saying is it doesn't make sense to conclude that cells that divide more become cancerous more often and therefore we should see the same incidence of cancer regardless of age, which is not what happens. Further I don't see how that conclusion supports a viral theory of cancer over chemically induced cancer (oxidative stress, carcinogens). I don't think theres anyone in the know who claims that the primary cause of cancers is errors during DNA replication. I'm obviously ready to entertain the idea that most tumors are the result of viral infection (or else I wouldn't have read what you had to say) but that point you were making still doesn't seem logical to me.

    62. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you heard about the British child that died days after receiving an MMR shot? I imagine you did.

      Did you hear that the the Coroner investigated and found the cause of death was not the vaccination? I bet you didn't.

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/dec/06/bad-science-mmr-vaccine

    63. Re:What about heredity? by spectecjr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From what I've been seeing, MS is more likely to be varicella zoster related than HSV1 related, however, your continued susceptibility to cold sores (most people stop getting them after a bout in their teens) may indicate a genetic susceptibility to herpres viridae.

      Here's the paper I found on varicella zoster & MS:
      http://archneur.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/61/4/529

      They're very similar viruses, and the treatment is nearly identical, so I wouldn't be surprised if treatment for one would affect the other.

      Looking into Rebif a bit more, it's an interferon. Other studies have shown that supplementation with interferons help considerably (in people with active HSV infections, typically blood interferon levels are low for one or more types of interferon; alpha, beta & gamma). Supplementing with interferons will work; I would try getting your doc to put you on valcyclovir as well and start eating a high lysine, low-arginine diet - or at least supplementing with lysine. See if it helps. Worst case, at least you won't get cold sore outbreaks :)

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    64. Re:What about heredity? by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      Well all I know about p52 is from reading one paragraph online describing it as part of a DNA damage detecting complex, and the wikipedia article on HSV says theres a gene that codes for a ubiquitin ligase with p53 as a substrate. So I guess...whats you're source?

    65. Re:What about heredity? by h3llfish · · Score: 1

      Colloquially, herpes means HSV II. Most people know that this definition is incorrect or at best incomplete, but not many can tell you why. Misinformation, rumor, and conjecture abound on this most sensitive of topics.

      Few people realize that the orally transmitted version know as "mono" (the one that 90 percent of adults has) is another critter from the same family.

    66. Re:What about heredity? by spectecjr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Interestingly, if you get HSV-1 before you get HSV-2, it gives you a degree of immunity to HSV-2. :)

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    67. Re:What about heredity? by cripkd · · Score: 1

      Ah, fellatio!

      I see. So you never please your lady, do you?

      --
      Curiously yours, crip.
    68. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A large fraction of people infected with herpes simplex virus got it from their parents. It is remarkably easy for a kid to pick up the disease from a used glass or a parent wiping the kid's nose after scratching a lip.

      Once you have the virus, you develop an immune response to it and are less likely to pick it up from another source.

      This mimics a genetic transmission pathway, but yes there are going to be variations in susceptibility based on genes.

    69. Re:What about heredity? by Tatarize · · Score: 1

      Yes. In fact, those kinds of interactions are trivial. Individuals who are homozygous for CCR5 delta-32 do not tend to suffer from a vast array of different very fatal diseases, in a rare number of cases. This is certainly genetic.

      The reason for this is that delta-32s are immune to HIV and HIV eats up the immune system causing a collapse and allowing a secondary set of infections take hold and inflict death. That isn't genetic.

      Acne is caused by a bacteria and yet runs in families as well. 1 factor = 1 disease is a poor way of looking at things in pathology.

      If there were a gene for Alzheimers that directly coded for the disease it would get weeded out rather quickly. The truth is far more complex and figuring it out is a major step in curing it.

      --

      It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
    70. Re:What about heredity? by Ramze · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Your post is rather smug, yet you fail to explain your reasoning. If the grandparent post is incorrect, why not explain why he or she is wrong rather than acting condescending without supporting your argument that the poster is incorrect? The core of the grandparent's post seems correct. Many diseases do not develop major symptoms or even show up at all until old age -- some because of the time they take to progress far enough for symptoms to be noticed, some because they are simply age-related diseases. It makes sense to me that as peoples' life spans increase, there would be a larger percentage of older people, thus a larger percentage of age-related diseases. The GP did say hundreds of years -- and life expectancy worldwide just a hundred years ago was only 40. Now it is 66.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_expectancy http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/lifexpec.htm http://www.efmoody.com/estate/lifeexpectancy.html

      That's not to say that I completely agree with the grandparent poster. Medical science has progressed a lot during the past 100 years as well and medical screenings and diagnosis have improved to the point where we may be seeing more cases because we are simply better at screening and diagnosing illnesses where as a hundred years ago, many people may have died from illnesses that went unnoticed and their deaths were decided to be because of old age. Also misdiagnosis was likely common because so many diseases have similar symptoms and without today's medical labs to do testing, it's quite possible many patients were misdiagnosed before modern analysis was prevalent.

    71. Re:What about heredity? by Saysys · · Score: 1

      That is a bad rule of thumb: Using more than about 8 to 10 things to try to explain the central cause of something goes beyond the limits of most reasonable multivariate statistics. If you go much beyond that then you probably need to collapse some constructs into each other.

      There is a point where "causes" hit a level of covariance that they are no longer statistically sound.

      To put it simply, age is a good factor to take into account which tends to change right-along with things like "bone density" and "ear hair" all of which, taken by themselves, will vary with each other and destroy the usefulness of your statistical analysis.

    72. Re:What about heredity? by Dorceon · · Score: 1

      Lately it's not Guillain-Barré either.

      --
      What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
    73. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is caused by a virus, then why is it passed down in genes?

      It is passed down all right, but it doesn't mean it was passed down in genes.

      Once you get infected, you have it for life. Occasionally (when sores surface) you can transfer it to your household members, your kids, who get chickenpox and afterwards can develop herpes.

    74. Re:What about heredity? by EMN13 · · Score: 1

      The distribution of ages in the population has shifted towards older ages. It's pretty continuous, so for any age (except 0), you'll find that the percentage of people at least that old has risen.

      Sure, there are some weird bumps here and there depending on where you live, but nothing which would vindicate your position.

    75. Re:What about heredity? by v(*_*)vvvv · · Score: 1

      Also perhaps herpes simplex virus can pass easily from parents to their children even if it isn't genetic. Much like diet and exercise habits influencing weight and blood sugar trends within families, and even AIDS which isn't genetic but will transfer easily without intervention.

    76. Re:What about heredity? by meridian · · Score: 1

      Herpes can be passed to the child while it is still in the womb from the mother. This was reported on sciencedaily some time ago. I am too lazy to look for the link sorry.

      --
      meridian at tha.net
    77. Re:What about heredity? by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      Now, if your "magic" age is 40, and the only contributing factor is age, what percentage of the adult population (in each instance) will contract cancer?

      If you get different answers for each group, you still fail, and need to go back to the beginning.

      Allow me to ask your questions back at you, slightly adjusted to allow for the GP's point:

      Assume 50% of a population dies before they turn 2 years old. Assume the other 50% die at age 60. What is the average (mean) life exepctancy?

      Now, 100 years later, only 1% die before they turn two, and 99% die at age 80. What is the average (mean) life expectancy?

      Now, if your "magic" age is 70, and the only contributing factor is age, what percentage of the adult population (in each instance) will contract cancer?

    78. Re:What about heredity? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      P52, P53, whatever it takes.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    79. Re:What about heredity? by NameNoname · · Score: 1

      I think my brain just exploded. Scary stuff. Thanks, I think.

      Forced vaccinations are such an outrageous invasion of the human body. Man, I'm steaming just thinking about this...What is next, they use the vaccination excuse to inject us with an RFID chip?

    80. Re:What about heredity? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't forget Herpes Simplex 10, which is what Eddie Murphy's character 'Ramon' had in Beverly Hills Cop: [from imdb.com]:

      "Tell Victor that Ramon - -the fella he met about a week ago? - -tell him that Ramon went to the clinic today, and I found out that I have, um, herpes simplex 10, and I think Victor should go check himself out with his physician to make sure everything is fine before things start falling off on the man."

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    81. Re:What about heredity? by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      I'd heard the figure at about 70%. The genital figure is about 20%. We like to make jokes about genital herpes but the truth is it is symptomatically the same as oral. The only difference is that the HSV2 virus prefers the genital area. Keep in mind, however, that some people have HSV1 (oral) on their genitals and visa-versa. We stigmatize genital herpes as an STD and oral herpes as a "cold sore" to make it more palatable (pardon the pun) but the truth is those with herpes outnumber those without.

      Some research shows that the virus may help combat other viruses.

    82. Re:What about heredity? by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      I'm more inclined to believe that the herpes simplex virus, being mild, easily transmitted and having the ability to "hibernate" has been spreading through your family.

      Ever had a cold sore? Your mom? Your dad?

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    83. Re:What about heredity? by jeremiahbell · · Score: 1

      The cold sore virus can be passed in the womb from mother to child. Genetic factors also play a role, but you could get the double wammy: The genetics and the virus.

      --
      "Where have all the good people gone?" - Jack Johnson
    84. Re:What about heredity? by chooks · · Score: 1

      Yes. There's a gene called APOE-1.

      It's actually APOE-e4 (according to the abstract of TFA).

      --
      -- The Genesis project? What's that?
    85. Re:What about heredity? by T.E.D. · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was just relating this post to my wife when she said "I wonder, if all that is true, if it is possible the vaccinations we all receive for chickenpox might actually be the root cause of all these diseases".

      Errr...no. The chickenpox vaccine has only been licensed in the US since 1995. Almost no Aldsheimers sufferers have had that vaccine. If there were any effct from it, you wouldn't see it in most diseases associated with aging for a few decades yet.

    86. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The herpes virus can rewrite your DNA, thus making the virus genetic.

      This just proves Stevenson right. The Nam Shoc of Enki did bring about the fall of Babel by adding a virus to the water supply which gave alzheimers to the population. Re-read Snow Crash.

    87. Re:What about heredity? by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Oops... sorry about that. Thanks for the fact-check. (I was mixing up HSV-1 and APOE-4... damn we need easier to remember terminology for this stuff :) )

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    88. Re:What about heredity? by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      The herpes family of viruses is certainly one of the most "successful." It's everywhere.

      To emphasise the point (same article, second paragraph):

      "Epstein-Barr virus occurs worldwide, and most people become infected with EBV sometime during their lives. In the United States, as many as 95% of adults between 35 and 40 years of age have been infected."

    89. Re:What about heredity? by ChrisBerg · · Score: 1

      Pharmaceutical companies pay doctors to publish these fraudulent studies to promote their sale of a very expensive drug like Acyclovir. They're hosing us, just like they've convinced parents to put their kids on Ritalin (attention deficit b.s.) Alzheimers is caused by old age, not viruses. Every MRI that I've seen says the same thing, "Cardiovascular atrophy". Don't use it, like muscle tissue, you'll lose it. Heredity, and longer lives, are major factors that you can't do anything about. What you can do is use your brain. mensunion.org, Paint, write, play music, sculpt, dance, and most important, get cardiovascular stimulating exercise. Best, Chrisberg, RN

    90. Re:What about heredity? by nategoose · · Score: 1

      Do you kiss your mother with that mouth?

    91. Re:What about heredity? by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      "...so it's easier for the virus to reappear as shingles in adults who had chicken pox as children."

      Funny you mention that.

      I had chickenpox as a child as well as an outbreak of shingles about 3 years ago. It also, a year later, progressed into an outbreak that attacked the trigeminal nerve in my face. Felt like someone was squeezing my left eyeball, extracting all the teeth on the left side of my face and was performing a frontal lobotomy on me, without anesthetics. More pain then I have ever felt, and I have felt monumental pain before(I have plenty of stainless steel in me to prove it). I also suspect it is the root cause of a digestive problem I have(one leg of the feedback loop the stomach uses is nervous, the other hormonal).

      My question is this.

      Is the fact that I am rarely externally exposed to the virus in its wild form(due to everyone being vaccinated these days) the cause, or is the initial exposure still at cause?

      Could it be possible that vaccinations are making things worse for people that acquire the virus naturally?

      I intentionally let my kids play in the dirt, macking down on mouthfulls of the stuff if they chose, so that they would have a natural resistance to bacteria(seems to have worked, all growed up and healthy). Could our use of vaccinations be affecting us in a negative manner the same way never being exposed to germs would certainly put one at a disadvantage, once exposed later in life?

    92. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another alternative, of course, is that the virus infects lesions more easily than healthy tissue.

    93. Re:What about heredity? by wildsurf · · Score: 1

      ...which can be caused by at least two variants of the Herpes virus.

      If you have them both, would that be called Herpes Duplex?

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    94. Re:What about heredity? by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      k thanks

    95. Re:What about heredity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That or both sides of your family has herpes.

    96. Re:What about heredity? by Courageous · · Score: 1

      You were correct. I meant pandemic.

      C//

  4. Anti-vaccine crowd? by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's wait until the anti-vaccine douchebags hear about THIS. Doesn't this vaccine turn your prepubescent daughter into a whore?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by Frozentech · · Score: 1

      You're mixing up 'yer virii. HSV vice HPV.

    2. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by pxlmusic · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      regardless, there are still fundie morons who insist the aforementioned assertion. they conveniently forget, or do not know, that it is for their daughters' protection as their future husbands are not likely to enter marriage as virgins.

      --
      "If for any reason you're not satisfied with our service, I hate you."
    3. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by Belial6 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are showing no more understanding of the issue than those you mock. The group of people that are against vaccinations are a separate and only slightly overlapping group to the 'fundies' that you are talking about. Most of the people that refuse immunization do so based on what they believe is the correct MEDICAL choice. Most fundamentalists get their children immunized. Most of the fundamentalists that think HPV vaccination will lead to promiscuous premarital sex by girls, also think that premarital sex by boys is wrong. They are not against immunization, they just want premarital sex to have a heavy toll to try to stop it.

      Calling people morons when you clearly do not understand the issue is kind of ironic.

    4. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by pxlmusic · · Score: 1

      well, perhaps i was overstating. allow me to correct and clarify:

      regarding the religious reasons behind the HPV vaccination, the assumption that their daughters will become instant sluts is unfounded. but i also feel that it's for the good of the women to get the HPV in the event that the man they marry (even if the women are virgins) aren't as pure as their brides.

      --
      "If for any reason you're not satisfied with our service, I hate you."
    5. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by ObiWonKanblomi · · Score: 1

      Or what about those who think immunizing their kids will bring about Autism?

    6. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by c_forq · · Score: 1

      Clarified you are still way off. The "fundies", as you put it, don't think their daughters will become instant sluts, but they see the vaccine as lowering the risk of sex. The lower risk of sex means there is less reason not to engage in pre-material sex. They don't think Jenny will become an instant slut, what they think is Jenny will have fewer reasons to say no to Bill's requests put it in, just a little bit, just to see how it feels.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    7. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by pxlmusic · · Score: 1

      perhaps so, but it doesn't mean that they should put their daughters' future health at risk because she might give into her natural hormonal urges and/or because her boyfriend is persuasive enough.

      i just don't think that their disapproval of sex is enough to warrant the possible future health risk.

      how angry would Jenny if she stayed a virgin but still ended up with cervical cancer because her parents thought it give her an excuse to have sex?

      it's not necessarily on par with the Christian Scientists who refuse modern medicine for their child, but it's not that far behind.

      --
      "If for any reason you're not satisfied with our service, I hate you."
    8. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      You're mixing up 'yer virii. HSV vice HPV.

      Yeah, the difference is in the statistics: While only the majority of people end up with HSV, damn near everybody ends up with HPV.

    9. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by endothermicnuke · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're mixing up 'yer virii. HSV vice HPV.

      Oh for fuck's sake, it's not virii. It's viruses. Please stop using this non-existent term.

    10. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by nog_lorp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, I would say it is the exact same thing, refusing possibly life-saving modern medicine to their children based on unfounded religious beliefs.

      Not to mention, the argument that HPV vaccination will "Lower the perceived risk of engaging in sex" is complete BS. Word wide, throughout history, no teenager in the world has ever thought - "I want to have unprotected sex... but I might get Human PapillomaVirus!" The health related factors that lead to the choice of abstinence are more along the lines of pregnancy, HIV, and genital herpes. The truth is, it is not about prevention it is about punishment. HPV vaccination isn't going to have any affect on decision-making, but it reduces the chance the people will die for screwing around, and religious fundamentalists don't want that.

      Furthermore, even if you believe there is any morality to this argument, it is still baseless due to the fact that sexual contact is not the only way to get a virus, even blood-born ones. If your daughter steps on a used needle in the sand at the beach, and catches HPV, and dies of cervical cancer, what have you achieved? You are responsible for her death. Furthermore, refusal to vaccinate against STDs is tantamount to blaming the victim for rape, as this is a common avenue for infection.

      If it wasn't clear already, I feel strongly that anyone who would advocate against immunizations for 'moral reasons' is morally despicable.

    11. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I want to have unprotected sex... but I might get Human PapillomaVirus!" The health related factors that lead to the choice of abstinence are more along the lines of pregnancy, HIV, and genital herpes.

      Do you realize the HPV is herpes? Did you know the vaccine only protects from HPV-16, 18, 6, and 11. Are you aware these strains cause warts?

    12. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are enough diseases without the vaccine, so it's a bit prematurely to assume she will be more likely to give into it.

      If someday we succeed in erradicating all sexually transmitted infections, she will know that her boyfriend is immune anyway.

    13. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I still think you overstate the rational (a little), but you are at least attacking the group you really want to now. I happen to agree that girls should get the HPV immunization, they should also be getting it BEFORE they are sexually active. I know a lot of people who are not religious that think that they should wait until their daughter is sexually active before getting vaccinated.

    14. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by c_forq · · Score: 1

      Except that the vaccines only protect from 4 strains of herpes, all of which are transmitted by sex (well 11 can be transmitted orally, but is not associated with cervical cancer). Also the vaccination can be administered as late as 26 years old, so your hypothetical case should be able to get the vaccine herself regardless of her parents neglect to do so.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    15. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by pxlmusic · · Score: 1

      exactly.

      these are the same people who advocate abstinence-only education and seem totally oblivious to the teen pregnancy and STD rates that are a direct result of the lack of education these kids have.

      --
      "If for any reason you're not satisfied with our service, I hate you."
    16. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by rivetgeek · · Score: 1

      uh...HPV is NOT herpes. Herpes simplex virus versus Human PapillomaVirus. HSV doesnt even cause the same symptoms. And hpv generally goes away on its own after a couple years

    17. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      Are you aware that you are horribly wrong?

      HPV is in the family Papillomaviridae, Herpes is the family Herpesviridae. HPV is not Herpes. Furthermore, Herpes causes painful sores while wart-causing strains of HPV cause... warts, which are non-painful non-malignant growths. FURTHERMORE, 16 and 18 (and all other carcinogenic forms) do not cause warts or other visible symptoms. Finally, 16 and 18 are responsible for 71% of all cases of cervical cancers, other strains individually causing less than 5% each.

    18. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Look at the originators of the arguments, one is on moral ground and the other is trying to make money. Just makes me go hmmmm....

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    19. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      If your daughter steps on a used needle in the sand at the beach, and catches HPV, and dies of cervical cancer, what have you achieved? You are responsible for her death.

      That is an extremely unlikely scenario.

      I'm willing to bet the possibility of dying due to complications of the HPV immunization is a couple orders of magnitude MORE LIKELY to happen, statistically.

      So, in your judgment, when a parent DOES get their child immunized, but they die due to medical complications, is the parent then also "responsible for her death", or does personal responsibility for unforeseen twists of fate only apply to those whose world view differs from your own?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    20. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by Ironica · · Score: 1

      I still think you overstate the rational (a little), but you are at least attacking the group you really want to now. I happen to agree that girls should get the HPV immunization, they should also be getting it BEFORE they are sexually active. I know a lot of people who are not religious that think that they should wait until their daughter is sexually active before getting vaccinated.

      I'm fortunate in that this is a hypothetical for us, as both our sons are boys... but for my part, I'm not getting my children a shot to prevent something that is really uncommon ANYWAY until it's been more thoroughly tested. There's no good longitudinal information about Gardasil, and there's waaaaaay too much money being spent by the vaccine manufacturers on taking the FDA out to lunch to make me feel like they're doing their conscientious duty in developing lifesaving medication.

      However... I agree that "Oh noes it gives them permission to have SEX!" is a piss-poor reason for not getting the vaccine. They'll have sex with or without permission. The only "clinically-proven" way to delay the loss of virginity is with thorough and explicit sex education.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    21. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Look at the originators of the arguments, one is on moral ground and the other is trying to make money. Just makes me go hmmmm....

      True true... though there's a third faction, those making informed decisions about health after doing research. Our current vaccination policies aren't set up for informed consent. You don't go into a pediatric appointment and hear from the doctor, "Vaccination X is recommended for children of your child's age. It has these benefits [list], and these risks [list]. Do you want to get this shot today?"

      No, you hear "It's time for your X shot! Here, sign this [child's health record on the line for shot X]." Then, after the shot has been administered, "Here's a flyer about the shot." The flyer mentions that this shot has the following potential side effects which are minor... [list of stuff you might otherwise call the doctor about because it might be a serious illness]. It also in rare cases has THESE side effects, which you should call your doctor if they happen..." [list of stuff that gives parents nightmares.]

      Vaccinations are like any other treatment. Patients (or their authorized representatives, i.e. parents) should be informed on the benefits and risks, and then give informed consent or refusal. Blanket refusing on principle is no better than blanket acceptance by default.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    22. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apologii

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    23. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      Of course, this is not a theoretical question for me - I have an 11 YO daughter - of course, her Mom and I (I should say my wife - just to make readers realize we are together) have said "Yep, she gets the vaccine" - it's just the MD wants to wait another 3 months becuase she just had a set of vaccines a few weeks back

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    24. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by nog_lorp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Out of "over 16 million doses of Gardasil given" ... "at least 20 women who received the Gardasil vaccine have died, there is no evidence that deaths or serious outcomes were connected to the shot.[28] Where information was available, the cause of death was explained by other factors."

      That puts it at a 1 in 800,000 ratio, where most cases were not actually linked to the vaccine.

      At one SMALL beach where I live, lifeguards extract over 150 needles per year from the sand, well over 1 every 3 days. I'm willing to bet more than 1 in 800,000 of those needles are `found by accident`, and most of them were used by people with a chronic disease.

    25. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by pcgabe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Word wide, throughout history, no teenager in the world has ever thought - "I want to have (unprotected) sex... but I might get Human PapillomaVirus!"

      Sadly, I had a girl say (almost) those exact words to me recently. I thought she was joking. She wasn't.

      I don't see her anymore.

      --
      Don't put advice in your sig.
    26. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      It's the somewhat recent unacknowledged moral relativism of the religious right.

      XYZ is a Sin.
      Why? Because it's Bad.
      Why? Because sin causes you pain by commiting it.
      Why because of God? No that would be evil if it were God. It's the natural consequences of your actions which he allows to happen.
      What if we remove the natural consequences and make it safe? *Pause* It's a sin so you shouldn't do it.

      Gluttony is not inherently sinful. If our metabolism was setup such that we could eat 30,000 calories a day and be perfectly healthy then we would have no problem with 'extreme' eaters. We're addicted to breathing. But it's healthy. There's nothing which makes any number of activities from smoking to gluttony being made 'consequence free' with sufficient technology.

      The list could go on but the morality of many sins is based upon natural consequences. "Homosexuality is evil because the people who practice it are miserable and shunned by society." You stop shunning homosexuals and any 'natural consequences' evaporates. "AIDS is a natural consequence of immoral and unnatural sexual activity." Or you can get it from your mother at birth. Or married heterosexual couples can get it...

      Every time society attempts to actually make measureable strides in reducing a problem that's viewed as 'sin' the religious steps in and attemps to stop all progress by ensuring that the 'natural consequences' aren't removed from the equation.

      You think the anti-abortion debate is really about the life of the unborn? No. It's another smoke screen to ensure 'natural consequences' remain for an act that they disapprove of. What's the difference between 'murdering' an unborn child from incestual rape and unprotected sex? One of them wasn't concieved in sin by the mother. A true pro-life advocate wouldn't approve of killing a baby under any situation and yet a large number of 'pro-life' advocates do approve of abortions in which the mother is at risk. That's inconsistent.

      While I appreciate the religious factions begrudgingly adopting a more relativistic view of morality to reflect reality. I'm extremely displeased with their efforts to artificially maintain the status quo of consequences.

    27. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Things that make you go hmmmm...." C & C Music Factory

    28. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Morality is relative.

      your Morals are not my morals. Yet it seems the puritans out there are more interested in nailing their morals to everyone's chest than to save lives or improve health.

      People who are truly evil, force their morals on others and cause them to be miserable, sick or even die.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    29. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, cause Texas one of the first states to offer the HPV vaccine is full of anti-vaccine db's.

    30. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 0

      If your daughter steps on a used needle in the sand at the beach, and catches HPV, and dies of cervical cancer, what have you achieved?

      I'll give you a much more likely scenario: your daughter says no but her date won't stop. It's bad enough that she has to live with that, but now she has a fatal disease to go along with it.

      My girls will be vaccinated, not only because of what they might do, but because of what others might.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    31. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by oborseth · · Score: 1

      You have obviously done a bast amount of research on this subject. People like you are scary.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_papillomavirus

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herpes_simplex_virus

    32. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet more than 1 in 800,000 of those needles are `found by accident`, and most of them were used by people with a chronic disease.

      The ratio of people being killed by a vaccine does not directly correspond to the ratio of needles found/not found.

      That 1:800,000 vaccine mortality figure you are using is 'preliminary' at best, with the distinct possibility of a much higher mortality over a longer time period.

      And what you are "willing to bet" is extremely weak evidence.

      Finally, the likelihood that any one of those needles is contaminated with HPV is extremely slim, and transmission is far, far less likely still.

      Still, none of which is relevant to the question asked: When a child dies, at least partially due to the vaccination, are the parents "murders", as they are when the child dies of NOT getting it? Why?

      Your assertion seems to be that it's more likely to die of not getting the vaccine, versus complication due to getting. Of course even that is quite iffy, since there's no way of knowing if those who had been vaccinated, and died, would have been exposed to HPV during their lifetimes. But in any case, at what point does it become murder? 10001:10000? 2:1? 10:1? How good do the odds have to be before you become responsible for a freak accident, either way.

      And on a similar note, how close do the odds have to be, before the cure is worse than the disease, and people who DO give such medication to their children are the murders?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    33. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      Based on the formulation of the vaccine, there is really no reason to believe there is a risk of long-term complications. Also, the 'preliminary' status of that figure should be offset by the fact that there has never been a case where there has been a direct link between the vaccine and death/serious complications.

      Regardless, intent needs to be taken into account when assessing culpability. If a child dies due to their parents' decision to/to not vaccinate them, one could hold them partially responsible if they made the wrong decision from a medical standpoint (or hold responsible anyone who gave them bad medical advice). If a child dies due to their parents decision based on unfounded beliefs in "divine punishment" - then they can certainly be held responsible.

    34. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by ThinkTwicePostOnce · · Score: 1

      There's another reason certain people work so hard to suppress the
      sexual behavior of others, a reason seldom mentioned, but obviously
      true: good old competition to get ones genes into the next generation.

      You can compete by having more sex with more partners and producing
      more babies, and you can compete by preventing other people from
      doing the same thing.

      Slap 'em down-aholics, I like to call them.

      --
      Hide all sigs: Click HELP+Prefs (top), VIEWING (last on right), DISABLE SIGS (3rd on left) and SAVE (hidden at bottom).
    35. Re:Anti-vaccine crowd? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I had a girl say (almost) those exact words to me recently. I thought she was joking. She wasn't.

      She wasn't joking, she was making up a terrible excuse. If it was a great excuse, then you'd have lost something!

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  5. timely article by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    in a few weeks, poor innocent little children will get visits from aunt bertha and grandma marge, and the first thing the strange smelly relatives will do is find the innocent children, exclaim "my how you've grown!" or "aren't you the cutest thing, i could eat you up!" and, approaching the children, who will now be rapt in horror, they will proceed to plant wet sloppy kisses, over the protestations and gyrations of the children sturggling to break free of the bear arm grip

    and, the kids are right to object. they are trying to avoid herpes and alzheimers

    kisses from old relatives is a brain mummifying disease

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:timely article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      in a few weeks, poor innocent little children will get visits from aunt bertha and grandma marge,

      Crap, I've lost to the internet.

      First thing I saw was "Grandma Mage".

      Second thing was "My robe and wizard hat"

    2. Re:timely article by MrMista_B · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not to mention fainty pedophilic. Which kids are good at picking up on.

    3. Re:timely article by maugle · · Score: 1

      They'll be lucky if the perfume doesn't suffocate them first.

    4. Re:timely article by TechwoIf · · Score: 1

      The child can not say no to grandma violating the most sensitive spot of there body. So that means they can not say no to there uncle that what to touch a less sensitive area. For the clueless, parents have been training children they can not say "no" to the uncle that want to rub in between there legs. Now I can educate the parents without mortifying them by using this virus as a excuse. This is a good thing overall.

    5. Re:timely article by TerranFury · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's an issue with this of course. By the time you get older -- say, into your early 20s -- about 50% of the people your own age have oral HSV-1. What do you do, live in fear of contracting the virus? Don't kiss your date good night? Only consider romantic involvement with the 50% of the population that doesn't have HSV-1?

      The problem is that the only way to avoid getting HSV-1 that isn't completely absurd is to just be lucky.

    6. Re:timely article by F'Nok · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's the issue?
      I know a lot of people (myself included) that actively avoid kissing, sharing glasses, etc with people that have cold sores.

    7. Re:timely article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely the kid already has been exposed to herpes from his/her parents and siblings. And kisses from anyone might be brain mummifying disease. Remember most scientific studies are probably wrong.

    8. Re:timely article by Dravik · · Score: 1

      You haven't lost your dragon by any chance?

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    9. Re:timely article by Lazarian · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points right now, I'd mod that up to the sky. If those creepy relatives never slobbered on me and pinched my cheeks until I almost screamed, I'd probably never have gotten the gift of cold sores. I hope they die from ass cancer.

    10. Re:timely article by TerranFury · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's easy to avoid kissing, etc. people who are actively having outbreaks. I avoid that too. But people with HSV are contagious at other times as well. The phrase is "asymptomatic viral shedding" -- and, actually, infected people are shedding more often than they are having outbreaks! So if you rule out people who have HSV-1, and not just those who are currently having an obvious outbreak, then you've ruled out 50% of the population. What do you do, ask a girl "Do you have any history of cold sores?" before you kiss her? It just doesn't seem practical to me.

    11. Re:timely article by kripkenstein · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ah, it's even worse. A person might have no history of symptoms but still be infected, and have asymptomatic shedding. So it makes little sense to inquire about a history, at least as far as asymptomatic shedding is considered (you might inquire for other reasons).

      That said, it still makes sense to avoid sharing food, kissing, etc. people who have active symptoms. The amount of virus particles is much, much higher than asymptomatic shedding in such a case.

      But otherwise, there isn't much you can do.

    12. Re:timely article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry for posting a reply to my own anonymous post like this, but I just realized that I was actually posting what I had been thinking about myself. Didn't mean to seem like a turd myself.

      Peace and love and flowers for everyone.

    13. Re:timely article by Dralnu · · Score: 1

      Spending time with said relatives can lower ones IQ, if many of the ones I've met is any indication. At least with this, you have a reason to be totally lost.

  6. Oh crap! by GomezAdams · · Score: 1

    I had a 'fever blister' about every month when I was a kid. I had better follow up on this. Although we never had any Alzheimers in the family my oldest cousin and her ex-husband both have it. There was never a case in his family either.

    --
    Too lazy to create a sig...
    1. Re:Oh crap! by Gothmolly · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sounds like mom had the ol' pirate mouth.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    2. Re:Oh crap! by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Funny

      did "uncle" gary ask you to suck his meat popsicle, by any chance?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:Oh crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahha

  7. Silver Ions in Solution Kill Viruses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Herpes Zoster and Herpes Simplex viruses are killed with a silver ion concentration of 16ppm or more. Just hold the solution in your mouth for ten minutes, then spit it out. There is no danger of Argyria since most is discarded and very little remains in your blood stream. Estimates are 4 parts per billion, which is far below the 2 grams generally recognized as required for Argyria to show. The little that does remain is eliminated in several days, so it is wise to keep taking the solution as a preventative measure.

    The ions appear to work with the immune system much the same way as other trance elements are needed, like chromium, selenium, and so on. A deficiency of silver will make you more vulnerable to pathological infections, but these disappear as soon as the silver ions are absorbed into the blood stream.

    Most of the solutions sold in health stores is 3 to 5 ppm, which is too weak to do much good. You need about 16 ppm or more. With skill and practise, you can make this yourself for pennies per dose. Please see my web site at http://silversol.net63.net/ for more info.

    1. Re:Silver Ions in Solution Kill Viruses by Metasquares · · Score: 2, Informative

      HSV and VZV take up residency within the nervous system, where they remain indefinitely. Even if your proposed solution does kill an active HSV infection, it will not root out the latent virus, thus the cold sores will continue to periodically recur.

    2. Re:Silver Ions in Solution Kill Viruses by Kagura · · Score: 1

      Most of the solutions sold in health stores is 3 to 5 ppm, which is too weak to do much good. You need about 16 ppm or more.

      Dangit man, you're screwing up my homeopathy business! It's less that means more, not more means more!

    3. Re:Silver Ions in Solution Kill Viruses by Rayban · · Score: 2, Funny

      If homeopathy works, then my distilled water is more powerful than any of their concoctions!

      --
      æeee!
    4. Re:Silver Ions in Solution Kill Viruses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "HSV and VZV take up residency within the nervous system, where they remain indefinitely. Even if your proposed solution does kill an active HSV infection, it will not root out the latent virus, thus the cold sores will continue to periodically recur."

      This is true. I got Shingles a second time and it was very painful with bleeding sores. But the silver solution I was making at the time was not very strong at only 6 to 8ppm.

      I spent an entire weekend studying the process and learned how to make a much stronger solution, and give the results of my studies in the theory section on my web site: http://silversol.net63.net/theory/cstheory.htm

      I found it is possible to consistently reach just over 20ppm by plotting the conductance of the solution vs time. It rises in a straight line until the ions reach the opposite electrodes, then the curve starts to flatten. This is the point at which you stop the process and pour the solution into a container for storage.

      The process is described starting on the page at http://silversol.net63.net/theory/analysis.htm

      This is the first accurate description of how the the process works published on the web.

      The ions do not stay in the body very long. So it is important to take the solution every day or so, and more often if you feel a cold coming on. It is extremely inexpensive, and very effective. None of my friends who take the solution regularly get sick any more. In fact, they can't even remember the last time they had the flu or a cold sore.

      Regards,

      Mike Monett

    5. Re:Silver Ions in Solution Kill Viruses by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Just a heads up to people interested in this.

      Its homeopathic "science" which is a ridiculous concept.

      Oh, and the people who try this? Their skin turns cobalt blue forever.

      Let the researches find a safe vaccine to Alzheimers. Dont experiment at home with your health.

    6. Re:Silver Ions in Solution Kill Viruses by Kagura · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you crazy? You could die or be seriously disabled by imbibing something that potent.

    7. Re:Silver Ions in Solution Kill Viruses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a heads up to people interested in this.

      "Its homeopathic "science" which is a ridiculous concept."

      Homeopathic means reducing the concentration so it is unmeasurable. The process I describe is the opposite. I show how to increase the concentration to the maximum possible, about 20ppm. This is by definition not homeopathy.

      "Oh, and the people who try this? Their skin turns cobalt blue forever."

      As I described earlier, you hold the solution in your mouth for ten minutes then spit it out. Since most of the ions are discarded, it is not possible to accumulate the required 2 to 5 grams of silver for Argyria to appear.

      Also, the people who turn blue take a compound of silver , such as silver nitrate, silver acetate, mild silver protein, etc. These compounds can contain 5,000 to 50,000 ppm of silver, some of which remains in the body.

      Pure silver ions cannot have such a high concentration since the electrolysis process is self-limiting to around 21ppm.

      Please see "The Theory of Colloidal Silver", http://silversol.net63.net/theory/cstheory.htm; "Why Nobody Makes 45uS CS", http://silversol.net63.net/theory/goodcs.htm; "Analysing the CS Process", http://silversol.net63.net/theory/analysis.htm; and "Finding The Peak of Perfection", http://silversol.net63.net/theory/makecs.htm

      Theses articles whow why it is not possible to generate a high enough concentration of silver ions to cause Arygyria, especially when you spit most of it out at the end of ten minutes.

      "Let the researches find a safe vaccine to Alzheimers. Dont experiment at home with your health."

      You are literally taking the worst risks with this advise.

      There may never be a functional vaccine against Herpes. Silver ions are effective, inexpensive, and available now.

      Vaccines are never completely safe, and the products made by pharmaceutical companies and blessed by the FDA often have very serious side effects that are not described anywhere.

      Silver ions have no side effects. Period. You cannot overdose. There is no interaction with any other drug or pharmaceutical. There are no toxic materials in the solution, only pure distilled water, hydroxide (OH), and silver ions (Ag+).

      The available evidence is that silver is an essential trace element, just like selenium and chromium, and the immune system cannot function properly without it.

      Regards,

      Mike Monett

  8. Sounds like correlation not causation - yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The team discovered that the HSV1 DNA is located very specifically in amyloid plaques: 90% of plaques in Alzheimer's disease sufferers' brains contain HSV1 DNA, and most of the viral DNA is located within amyloid plaques. The team had previously shown that HSV1 infection of nerve-type cells induces deposition of the main component, beta amyloid, of amyloid plaques.

    100% might have been a clincher. If anti-virals help, I might have rto eat my worlds.

    Most people have HSV1. HSV1 DNA locates in the amyloids. So most people expressing the amyloids would have HSV1 DNA in them.

    What's up with the 10% of alzhemier amyloids without the HSV1. It sounds like amyloid metabolism is the problem and HSV1 is along for the ride.

     

    1. Re:Sounds like correlation not causation - yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The HSV theory would explain why it attacks elderly people, which tend to have weaker immunity.

      Even if not the cause, antiviral therapy might prevent or slow down brain damage in AD, if it stops plaque build-up. (and they report good result in preliminary tests).

      Well at least people can start taking antiviral therapy now, as acyclovir is approoved medicament.

    2. Re:Sounds like correlation not causation - yet by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Other studies have shown that HSV1 has a mechanism by which it alters the creation of the amyloid proteins, and also tau proteins in nerve cells - the same two substances which are rife in Alzheimers'.

      The same team that did this study did the study on the protein mechanisms too.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    3. Re:Sounds like correlation not causation - yet by kripkenstein · · Score: 1

      The team discovered that the HSV1 DNA is located very specifically in amyloid plaques: 90% of plaques in Alzheimer's disease sufferers' brains contain HSV1 DNA, and most of the viral DNA is located within amyloid plaques. The team had previously shown that HSV1 infection of nerve-type cells induces deposition of the main component, beta amyloid, of amyloid plaques.

      100% might have been a clincher. If anti-virals help, I might have rto eat my worlds.

      Most people have HSV1. HSV1 DNA locates in the amyloids. So most people expressing the amyloids would have HSV1 DNA in them.

      What's up with the 10% of alzhemier amyloids without the HSV1. It sounds like amyloid metabolism is the problem and HSV1 is along for the ride.

      That's possible. Further research is needed. However, 90% is still suggestive enough to motivate future research, consider for example the case of HPV, which is now well-known to cause cervical cancer (and a few others). The initial results were much the same as these: 90% or thereabouts of tumors contained HPV DNA.

      So this is a promising starting point, but of course only time and future work will tell whether it is an actual causal factor.

    4. Re:Sounds like correlation not causation - yet by lazy+genes · · Score: 0

      The same may be true with Mad Cow.

  9. Is this a dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I don't remember :-(

  10. I wonder... by dexmachina · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With these findings in mind, it would be interesting if someone were to do a study and see if there's a correlation between Alzheimer's incidence and people who have a tendency to get cold sores. Since only 20-40% (according to TFA) of HSV-1 carriers develop cold sores, I wonder if being susceptible to outbreaks indicates a higher risk of developing Alzheimer's later in life. You'd have to correct for all sorts of environment factors, but still, as someone who gets cold sores something awful that would be a very interesting study. Anyways, great article, it's good news if something comes out of this. HSV in its different varieties is already known to be responsible for quite a few diseases so only good can come out of more research into it.

    1. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could also mean the opposite - that body immune systems reacts to herpes better in people with cold sores - so AD could also be less common.

    2. Re:I wonder... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      With these findings in mind, it would be interesting if someone were to do a study and see if there's a correlation between Alzheimer's incidence and people who have a tendency to get cold sores.

      I hope not. The only time I don't have cold sores is if I restrict my intake of acidic foods (oranges, tomatoes, etc)

    3. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFAbstract -- it's a nice piece of observational science which probably does, as most good observational science does, challenge assumptions and open questions. It doesn't really say what the Herpes virus does or how to cure the disease.

    4. Re:I wonder... by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Chapstick. Stay out of the sun (or use sunblock chapstick.)
      Foods high in lysine or lysine suppliments, and if you can, avoid foods with lots of arginine.
      Here is a list of foods to choose and to avoid.
      Abreva is a not-stunningly-expensive OTC that reduces symptom duration.
      If you're having it that often you can probably get prescribed Acyclovir, since there's a chance of Bell's Palsy every time you have an outbreak, and boy does that suck.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    5. Re:I wonder... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Oops, not cold sores. "Aphthous ulcers" (canker sores). For some reason I have always heard the terms used interchangeably. (Your mention of sunblock is what tipped me off.)

    6. Re:I wonder... by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      Thankfully not caused by Hep.

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    7. Re:I wonder... by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      Sigh, way too early in the morning, meant HSV.

      Anyways, try switching to a toothpaste that doesn't contain sodium lauryl sulfate and take a multivitamin. Cleared things up (for the most part) for me.

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  11. Also, they will get cavities by bigtrike · · Score: 1

    Those kisses will also cause caries aka cavities

  12. Can one be tested... by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can one be tested for the herpes simplex virus? I never had an outbreak, but one winter when I was cyclilng in -17C (stupid, yeah, gimme a break, I love cycling) I got a cold sore on the tip of my nose. So now I would like to be able to dismiss the idea I have herpes simplex. But if I have it, I'd like to start a therapy ASAP - I don't want to get Alzheimer's.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Can one be tested... by mrmcwn · · Score: 1

      You can be tested, but it's a virus. No real therapy available.

    2. Re:Can one be tested... by DustyShadow · · Score: 1

      Very unlikely it was a cold sore if it was on your nose. Probably just a bad pimple. There are blood tests available but some give a lot of false positives. Go to an STD clinic if you want to be tested and ask for the IGG test. It is the better one.

    3. Re:Can one be tested... by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is a blood test for it. Chances are it will show positive. Most adults have it.

      --
      Be relentless!
    4. Re:Can one be tested... by maxume · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Any chance it was simply frostbite?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Can one be tested... by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      lead therapy has proven effective.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    6. Re:Can one be tested... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Single large injection to the brain or heart, I assume?

    7. Re:Can one be tested... by blind+biker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, yes it was a frostbite! Is that not the same as a cold sore, then?

      See, this happens because English is not my native tongue. Never lived in an English-speaking country, either. While I do have a reasonably good command of it, there are rare instances where English fools me, just like now.

      Note to self: cold sore != frostbite

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    8. Re:Can one be tested... by maxume · · Score: 1

      I thought it odd that you got one on your nose, from extreme cold. But yeah, cold sores are fever blisters (caused by the herpes simplex virus), and usually occur on the lips.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    9. Re:Can one be tested... by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      Note to self: cold sore != frostbite

      Indeed!

      The phrase "cold sore" is a misnomer that dates back to when people used to think that the sores had something to do with "getting a cold." And people keep using this phrase, I think, because it is a euphemism that lets them pretend that it's somehow "different" from that "other herpes."

      Just do a Google image search for "cold sore." They tend to appear on the lips, outside the mouth. What you are describing sounds completely unrelated.

    10. Re:Can one be tested... by dexmachina · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can see where you would be confused. Actually, cold sore is a much more logical name for frostbite anyways. But yes, indeed cold sore != frostbite. The former's a viral infection and the latter is just damage to the skin caused by the cold. I think cold sores are so named because cold weather (and by extension, having a cold) can cause an outbreak because of the stress it puts on your system. Personally, I find I'm most susceptible to getting a cold sore if there's been a recent big fluctuation in temperature.

    11. Re:Can one be tested... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially effective in pipe form delivered by a crushing blow to the back of the head.

    12. Re:Can one be tested... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      ...one winter when I was cyclilng in -17C (stupid, yeah, gimme a break, I love cycling) I got a cold sore on the tip of my nose.

      Most likely, it was simple frostbite. Cold doesn't give you cold sores, or even make you particularly susceptible to them.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  13. Herpes Simplex... by actionbastard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Might not be the only culprit here. Chicken pox (V. zoster) and Shingles (H. zoster) are related to HSV1 and HSV2. Many people may have had either -or both- of these infections as children or adults and carry the virus in a dormant state in their body. The research does not address these other -possible very prevalent- vectors in AD.

    --
    Sig this!
    1. Re:Herpes Simplex... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my day, parents used to deliberately expose their children to chicken pox and mumps because they're both far more serious if you contract them as an adult (chicken pox can kill adults and mumps can render males sterile)

    2. Re:Herpes Simplex... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      Exactly. There are a wide variety of diseases that are forms of or are related to HSV1/2. Chicken pox and shingles are just two. Additionally, there is viral meningitis, a form of encephalitis, occular herpes, and more.

      Finally, this news isn't that exactly that new. They originally discovered a link between Alzheimer's and HSV-1 in the late 70s. This is just the latest study that confirms this.

    3. Re:Herpes Simplex... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nowadays there's a chickenpox and mumps vaccines instead, BTW. Just saying.

    4. Re:Herpes Simplex... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is from the fine article on science daily:

      The team discovered that the HSV1 DNA is located very specifically in amyloid plaques: 90% of plaques in Alzheimer's disease sufferers' brains contain HSV1 DNA, and most of the viral DNA is located within amyloid plaques.

      In addition, one of the related articles (from Jan 2007) goes on to say this: A gene known to be a major risk factor for Alzheimer's disease puts out the welcome mat for the virus that causes cold sores, allowing the virus to be more active in the brain compared to other forms of the gene. ... The work links a form of the ApoE gene known as ApoE-4,... with HSV-1.

      I'm just irked that nobody has tried examining the plaques this way before.

    5. Re:Herpes Simplex... by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      CHickenpox and Shingles are caused by the same virus, in fact the progeny of the viruses that gave someone chicken pox are responsible for shingles(the virus stays in the body for life). Shingles occur usually when the immune system is weakened to the point that the virus can start reproducing without the immune system killing it.

  14. Cause or a side-effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't completely understand from reading TFA, do they think that the herpes virus is the cause, or is it possible that it's just taking advantage of the Alzheimer?

    1. Re:Cause or a side-effect? by rta · · Score: 3, Interesting

      they think it causes it:

      They propose that a weakened immune system allows the virus into the brain.

      There, it causes flare-ups in the brain at various times when the person is stressed etc. Basically, just like the cold sores on your lips.... but in the brain.

      These cause the cells to create this non-soluble plaque stuff which then gets left behind when the cells themselves die.

      The treatment with anti-virals would presumably prevent, or decrease, the number of "flare-ups" in the brain and therefore reduce the rate at which this Alzheimer's inducing plaque is formed.

      (although i'm not clear on whether the damage is caused by the plaques or if the plaques are just a marker of all the cells that have been destroyed and the disease is actually caused by that destruction.)

      if you've had cold sores and paid attention to how they seem to develop one can see how it would be destructive.

      1) You start out perfectly fine.

      2) For whatever reason this virus starts reproducing in some of your cells (highly localized)

      3) a cluster of blisters forms.

      4) After a few days, the "blisters" stop forming and you're left with a moderately significant wound that takes a while to heal.

      Now imagine this happening in your brain... and remember that nerve cells, unlike skin cells, don't really reproduce much (if at all).

      (Incidentally, i'm one of the people for whom Abreva (an OTC medicine) works very well. If I put it on in time it stops the progression in its tracks. HIGHLY recommended.

      now if i could only figure out how to rub it on my brain.....)

  15. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nastiest Alzheimer's joke ever:

    Guy brings his wife to the doctor. Doctor tells him "We screwed up the lab results. She either has AIDS or Alzheimers."

    Guy says "great, what should I do?"

    Doctor says "Drop her off about a mile away from home. If she finds her way home, don't fuck her!"

  16. trollin' trollin' trollin' by pxlmusic · · Score: 1

    this thread really brought out the trolls...

    --
    "If for any reason you're not satisfied with our service, I hate you."
  17. Disco Fever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we know why all those disco people seemed to suffer from brain damage!

  18. SDSU by pieisgood · · Score: 1

    Everyone at SDSU is doomed to have Alzheimer's.

    --
    Eat sleep die
    1. Re:SDSU by ptudor · · Score: 1

      and everyone at UCSD will be studying it

  19. Good News for Slashdot by pragma_x · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is excellent news for most slashdotters since the herpes 'cold-sore' virus is typically transmitted by kissing.

    1. Re:Good News for Slashdot by mkiwi · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is excellent news for most slashdotters since the herpes 'cold-sore' virus is typically transmitted by kissing.

      I said something like that to a doctor once at Mayo clinic. Imagine my surprise when he snapped back, "You can get it from kissing a glass."

    2. Re:Good News for Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why we're smarter than the rest!

    3. Re:Good News for Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only a wet glass that you've recently shared with someone
      Ah, the perils of cooties and backwash. :D

      Most viruses don't last too long in dry, cold environments.
      Dry hands have 10% of the transmission rate as wet hands. Same with utensils, etc.
      Clean them, let them dry, and you should stop -most- of the potential for transmission.

      ... but by the same token, the aerosols from an unrestricted sneeze travel 5 meters. That person sitting behind you in a bus coughing up a lung? He's probably infecting you with antibiotic-resistant TB. Yummy.

      Yet another reason to hate your coworker who sits near you in the cube farm and sneezes themselves hoarse.

    4. Re:Good News for Slashdot by antdude · · Score: 1

      Drats, I still get cold sores since I never kissed before and am still a virgin!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    5. Re:Good News for Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I said something like that to a doctor once at Mayo clinic. Imagine my surprise when he snapped back, "You can get it from kissing a glass."

      An argument for not sending donkeys to med school as well . . .

    6. Re:Good News for Slashdot by Technopaladin · · Score: 1

      I think thats why you should never share Monitors.

    7. Re:Good News for Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who kisses a glass?

  20. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1, Funny

    There's something about jokes that require improbable/impossible setups that just makes them not worth the effort...

  21. Not this homeopathy BS again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, you people claim that it even works over the phone.

  22. Daaammmnnn by Larryish · · Score: 2, Funny

    No wonder the hooker never remembers me.

  23. Not to make pre-marital sex dangerous by alexhmit01 · · Score: 1

    You have a BRAND NEW vaccine, where we don't have long term data on it, that prevents a disease that affects a small percentage of people with a virus... oh, and the only way to get that virus is a behavior that they don't their children to engage in. Given that vaccines always carry SOME risk, however small, it isn't necessarily irrational that they not want their young daughters given it.

    I have a cousin, as secular as they come, that passed on giving it to his daughter that was 10 at the time. He thinks that it's probably a good idea in a few years, but that his non sexually active daughter didn't need to be a guinea pig, and that by the time she was 14 or 15, we'd then have 4-5 years of results, which seemed better than 0.

    That said, vaccinating people "at risk" is BAD public policy, since the ideal vaccination is blanket to wipe out the virus. A 90% effective vaccine with 95% penetration is probably more useful than a 95% vaccination with 30% penetration, because you can eliminate spreading the virus, which generally wipes it out.

    1. Re:Not to make pre-marital sex dangerous by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      I agree with your cousins logic (rather, I find no serious fault with it, though I might not make the same decision). I take issue with the structure of this thread however, as the earlier parent was referring explicitly to religious fundamentalists who make the decision for specific reasons.

      Anyways, I also want to note that more than 95% of people are at risk for infection at some point in life (though not the resultant cancer) - currently "at least 50% of sexually active adults" have HPV.

      I do think, however, that once this vaccine is vetted it should be given to males as well as females.

    2. Re:Not to make pre-marital sex dangerous by pxlmusic · · Score: 1

      "I do think, however, that once this vaccine is vetted it should be given to males as well as females."

      a salient point, to be sure. i tend to be very critical of the very religious, but mostly due to their involvement in politics.

      more specifically, i mean religious organizations, while retaining their tax exempt status, still participating in political areas where they have no business.

      but that's my .02

      --
      "If for any reason you're not satisfied with our service, I hate you."
    3. Re:Not to make pre-marital sex dangerous by jbengt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Blanket vaccination policies didn't quite work in the effort to eliminate smallpox.
      A change to aggressive targeted vaccintaion policies did the trick.

  24. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    What you said reminds me of when I told a friend a stupid joke. He responded by saying, "It sounds like someone just made that up."

  25. So... by elthicko · · Score: 1

    Let me get this straight. If I always wear a condom I won't get Alzheimer's? :p

    1. Re:So... by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      Let me get this straight. If I always wear a condom I won't get Alzheimer's? :p

      I think you'd have to wear a condom over your face, too.

  26. Prevention by rossdee · · Score: 1

    So eould an AntiViral, like Acyclovir help prevent Alzheimers if taken early enough (say in your 40's)

  27. Tapped out by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

    This puts "This Is Spinal Tap" in a whole different light.

  28. Herd immunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That said, vaccinating people "at risk" is BAD public policy, since the ideal vaccination is blanket to wipe out the virus. A 90% effective vaccine with 95% penetration is probably more useful than a 95% vaccination with 30% penetration, because you can eliminate spreading the virus, which generally wipes it out.

    http://www.google.com/search?q=herd+immunity

  29. Researcher Matthew Wozniak by macraig · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If you read TFA, one of this study's researchers is a fellow named Matthew Wozniak. Mere coincidence, or relation to Steve?

    1. Re:Researcher Matthew Wozniak by macraig · · Score: 1

      "Offtopic"? Riiiight... because a question or comment about one of the researchers isn't at all relevant! Genius tends to run in families, so if he is in fact closely related to that other Wozniak, might that not be a minor detail worth knowing? (Which I now figure is less likely, given that I learned he's in the U.K., but nevertheless.)

      The people who voluntarily moderate Slashdot have lost some credibility with me lately; we ought to have some special test to exclude the irrational ones from the privilege. I have seen repeated abuse of "offtopic", "overrated", and especially "troll"; just because you have a violent emotional reaction to someone's comment is NOT a legitimate justification for moderating the comment as "troll". How about we have some sort of collective review of negative moderation, or perhaps a karma penalty for repeated abuse of it?

      If you can't keep your personal emotions out of your supposedly rational decision-making process, then for the sake of the rest of us please keep your grubby hands off the moderating process. Moderating is NOT a tool to make yourself feel better or someone else feel worse.

  30. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by jamesh · · Score: 1, Funny

    No it's true, really. Happened to a friend of a friend of mine. His wife never made it home apparently.

  31. wait, what? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    nambla troll?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  32. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AIDS isn't contagious, the HIV virus is.

  33. There's a reason he didn't get funded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same reason this medical story got headlined on a website moderated by computer geeks. It's called "bad science".

  34. Herpes Neurotropism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    To me this makes some sense (I'll pull up short of being the "that's not surprising" guy). Herpes is the most common cause of viral encephalitis in the United States, and many different members of the herpesvirus family establish latency in neurons. More to the point, and the reason HSV I (and II to a much lesser extent) is a common cause of encephalitis is the fact that it shows predilection for the trigeminal ganglion behind the eye, in close proximity to the cerebrum.

  35. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not to HER home.

    She's happier now, at least for a few minutes at a time.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  36. Why am I not surprised. by davolfman · · Score: 1

    Random transcriptions into our DNA and/or cronic uncured virus's kicking around in our system can have long-term effect? Who'd have thunk? Seriously though I've heard theories that some types of cancer might be the result of viral DNA from some prehistoric plagues leftover in our genome screwing things up. This would sorta be more of the same.

  37. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Nope, I heard that joke several years ago; in fact my wife told it to me, I think she got it from her brother in England.

  38. But it makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More importantly, I suspect, especially in the larger context of our long pre-industrial history, these relatives are giving children an opportunity to build immunity to other common pathogens. If this is in fact a behavior that has been selected for, then it makes sense that the transmission of the herpes virus (which will probably occur anyway after they grow up and have a couple of girl- or boy- friends) was a negative outweighed by the positives. For the majority of our species' history Alzheimer's was a disease with an average age of onset similar to the contemporary life expectancy. Today, while kids probably get their exposure to pathogens mainly through school, I imagine the immune system building process is on the whole more important than an attempt to avoid one recently-evidenced Alzheimer's correlation by seeking an increased level of sterilization in the child's environment. And once again, I don't imagine that contracting herpes as a child or as a young adult could be two drastically different things.

  39. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Don't be a dick. That is PC semantic bullshit. Would you say that "whooping cough" is contagious? Yes you would. Most people would. But, the causative agent of whooping cough is the bacterium Bordetella pertussis; "whooping cough" is a description of symptoms of a pertussis infection, like "acute immune deficiency" is a description of symptoms associated with an HIV infection. Playing with semantics doesn't make AIDS any less contagious.

  40. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    and herpes isn't contagious; the herpes simplex virus is.

  41. Appalling Indictment Of Medical Research If True by littlewink · · Score: 1

    If true, this should have been spotted by medical researchers years ago. It's not as if the statistical data isn't present - there's tons of it. If true, this once again shows how sucky our medical system is.

  42. correlation != causality by r7 · · Score: 1

    One thing the authors of this study seem to have forgotten is that there could still be other causes of Alzheimer's, and the HSV infection is simply opportunistic, as it is to other types of neural injury.

    1. Re:correlation != causality by spectecjr · · Score: 4, Informative

      You should read the other papers by Wozniak and Itzhaki. They include, for example, studies on how the HSV1 virus in-situ in nerve cells affects the expression of tau and beta-amyloid proteins, causing them to generate the exact types of plaques seen in AD patients.

      They've done a pretty damn compelling job. If they didn't have to dot their i's and cross their t's to the nth degree, I'd have called this one and said it's in the bag years ago.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  43. BHT Supresses Herpes by ottotto · · Score: 2, Informative

    Herpes is part of a family of lipid coated viruses. All such viruses are inhibited (but not cured) by consuming BHT. BHT in capsule and bulk for is available from VRP. For more on this visit their site, vrp.com/. It works for me perfectly. More on this can be found here:http://www.advance-health.com/bht.html.

    1. Re:BHT Supresses Herpes by quixote9 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      BHT stands for butylated hydroxytoluene. I'd be worried about the metabolites of anything that has toluene as a component. Think paint thinner. That stuff is not healthy in any significant quantity. BHT has been used as a food preservative since way back, but that too doesn't mean it's good for you. And it implies it's NOT good for you in any appreciable quantity. The reason things work as preservatives is because they're more or less toxic to living things, like bacteria, but in larger quantities also to larger living things.

      Let someone else be the guinea pig on this....

    2. Re:BHT Supresses Herpes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This comment betrays a profound lack of understanding of chemical nomenclature.

      The fact that BHT has toluene in its name does not make it substantially similar to toluene.

      It's possible to come up with naming for brain compounds like dopamine and serotonin which use toluene as a root. For example: 3,4-dihydroxy-a-aminomethyltoluene is one (obtuse) way to describe dopamine. However, the physiological effects of toluene and dopamine are completely different.

      That said, BHT as a treatment for cold sores sounds like a really stupid idea. Of course, that's par for the course with spam.

    3. Re:BHT Supresses Herpes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This comment betrays a profound lack of understanding of chemical nomenclature.

      The following should be an example of why:

      "Salt is sodium chloride. I'd be worried about the metabolites of anything that has sodium as a component. Sodium is NOT good for you in any appreciable quantity. It's a highly reactive material which spontaneously will burst into flames when it touches water."

      That said, I agree with the parent that BHT for cold sore treatment sounds like a stupid idea.

    4. Re:BHT Supresses Herpes by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

      Somewhere I saw a recipe of how to make a supertoxin ( think nerve gas et al ) out of BHT. It's nice to know a source of the pure stuff. I think the recipe was credible, and it sorta makes sense that something that is supertoxic to food spoilage germs could be altered to make it supertoxic to people.

      --
      ...
    5. Re:BHT Supresses Herpes by quixote9 · · Score: 1

      Well, obviously, I'm going to disagree with your comment. About my profound lack of understanding, that is. "Hydroxy" is just an OH group, "butylated" refers to a couple of 3-carbon compounds attached to the toluene center. I'm not familiar with BHT metabolism, but I'd be willing to bet money that the OH and "butyls" are split off and you'll be dealing with that toluene center at some point.

      You're right that merely having toluene as part of a different and much more complicated molecule does not mean it'll be metabolized in a way that produces the toluene component. But given BHT's structure, I'd bet, as a biologist, that the body is dealing with that breakdown product. Which is why I say let others be the guinea pigs. :/

  44. Enough treatments already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about a cure for something for a change?

    1. Re:Enough treatments already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if they provide a treatment.. Profit

      Cure.. not so much. sad..but true in far too many cases.

    2. Re:Enough treatments already by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      We don't have the tech to destroy latent viruses inside cells. We can stop them replicating. We can't kill them when they're just fragments of RNA sitting inside your cell itself.

      I've got a theory that you could probably initiate replication and nuke the particles as they come out of the cell - presuming that you're not just left with viral particles inside the cell still, and they all come out.

      The trick would be this:
      * Take lots of acyclovir.
      * Take lots of arginine butyrate (to encourage the virus to pop out)
      * Take lots of TNF-alpha (which also encourages the virus to replicate)

      Hopefully this would flush it out of your cells and kill it. However, I'm not certain that it would work; I'm pretty sure you'd still end up with some latent virus.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  45. HIV causes dementia by Frans+Faase · · Score: 1

    Sadly, this joke is incorrect, because recently it has become known that HIV causes damage to the brain even if there are no signs of AIDS. So people, how catch HIV when they young and take their anti-viral medications the rest of their life, and thus prevent AIDS, still risk that they will become dement.

  46. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by vyruss000 · · Score: 1

    Here's a better one:

    What's the good thing about Alzheimer's?

    You keep making new friends!

  47. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by wimme · · Score: 1

    And all those new and exciting shows and movies on TV.

  48. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by expatriot · · Score: 1

    Actually they can't watch TV, except for nature programs that don't have a plot.
    Impossible to follow a drama if you can't remember who the characters are or what they did five minutes ago.

  49. Motivation for Drug Researchers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I briefly dated a girl with herpes, so I've done quite a bit of research about it. One of the things that I found interesting is that because herpes is a nonfatal "nuisance" disease, it doesn't get a lot of attention from drug researchers. And a lot of herpes patients have stories about doctors who don't take seriously the impact of the disease on their quality of life.

    There is a severe stigma to having herpes and those who have it often suffer from fear of rejection far beyond what the stereotypical Slashdot geek has to endure. Add to that the potential guilt of having transmitted it to others and the feeling of victimization of acquiring from a partner who through ignorance or selfishness didn't tell you that they had it. Even if it IS a "nuisance" disease, it carries all the shame and anxiety that come with a serious STD.

    If it is associated with Alzheimer's disease, however, maybe that will serve as stronger motivation to the medical community to find a cure or a vaccination -- sort of how they found a vaccination for the strains of Human Papiloma Virus most frequently implicated in cases of cervical cancer.

    1. Re:Motivation for Drug Researchers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very good point. I also noticed this while researching the difference between HPV and HSV. I've had friends and gfs before with HPV and oral HSV so I get a bit paranoid.

      Well I made the mistake of going to the beach and going into the water with my clothes on. Didn't have a change of clothes so I wore them all day. I picked up Molluscum Contagiosum. It is normal is children (appears on the face/neck IIRC) but in adults it is frequently an STD and appears on the genitals. I assume I got it from some infected person in the water (or from waste dumped in the water). My immune system was pretty screwed from my job at the time (worked with biological media powders). I didn't get it from sex but the stigma was there. The asshole doctor refused to believe my story but treated me anyways (after making me get tested for other STDs first). There's really almost nothing you can do for it aside from liquid nitrogen "burning." No one seems to bother researching it because it isn't fatal. But again, the stigma is there and really made me feel like shit (mentally). My gf at the time and I almost got into fights over where it came from (accusing each other of cheating, etc.) Even after that subsided the lack of sex from fear of transmission was hard to bare.

      I ended up doing research myself and self treated since the douchebag doctor decided to go on a month long vacation in the middle of my treatments and not tell me. If anyone has Molluscum Contagiosum or is interested, check out Goldenseal. It has very promising antiviral properties against a whole slew of afflictions. I brewed it as a tea (about the tip of a teaspoon full per 8 oz water or so, with lots of honey. it is SUPER bitter and tastes like lightning bugs or fireflies smell) and sipped throughout the day. Poured a more concentrated tea of it onto a paper towel and applied it to the blistered area for 15 minutes or so a few times a day. It cleared up in about 5 days. The liquid nitrogen treatment didn't seem to do anything but spread it faster. (Just make sure not to use Goldenseal orally for more than a week or two. It seriously kills pretty much any bacteria or virues in your body, good or bad.)

  50. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Funny

    So we've found Hollywood's target demographic?

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  51. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by peterhoeg · · Score: 1

    Along the same lines, the following joke was told by a relatively senior person in a large international company at his closing address to a group of sales directors at a sales conference in Bangkok, Thailand. A friend of mine was present and swears it was told exactly this way:

    Gentlemen, as we finish tonight a great number of us will be going out after dinner. A word of warning though - half the prostitutes have AIDS and half have tuberculosis, so make sure you pick one who coughs.

  52. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr. Jones went to the doctor. The doctor said to him, "I'm sorry Mr. Jones, but you have Alzheimers, and you have cancer."
    Mr. Jones smiled and replied, "Well, at least I don't have cancer!"

  53. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by Hordeking · · Score: 1

    I just lost my train of thought.

    It's those pesky kids...always putting pennies on the tracks, derailing your train of thought...

    --
    Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
  54. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by Hordeking · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Nope, I heard that joke several years ago; in fact my wife told it to me, I think she got it from her brother in England.

    Yuck. Your wife's sexcapades with her discotheque brother should not be discussed on /. I certainly hope you don't fuck her anymore. :P

    --
    Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
  55. No, wait wait wait... I got one! by Tetsujin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OK, so there was this guy with Alzheimer's, right? And one time some people came to his room. He was very tired, and so he mostly just lay in his bed. When he thought they might be saying something that needed a response he'd say "sure". Mostly, however, he kept quiet.

    After a bit, someone else came in and asked him to eat some crushed-up pills and drink some juice. When presented with the straw for the juice, instead of drinking, he blew some bubbles through the straw - and everybody there got a good laugh.

    I don't have a problem with people who make jokes about Alzheimer's... Nothing should be beyond the scope of humor. But this is a sample of what Alzheimer's is to me.

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  56. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by bandmassa · · Score: 1

    And while he's being a PC semanticist, it's HIV or Human Immuno Virus, but to call it the HIV Virus is to say virus twice.

    --
    "I hope you like Guinness, Sir. I find it a refreshing substitute for, er... food." Col. Jack O'Neil, SG-1
  57. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also have a funny joke:

    A man walked into a bar and asked for a scotch.
    The bartender said "We're out of scotch."
    The man said "Give me a scotch."
    The bartender said "I just said, we're out of scotch!"
    The man said "Give me a scotch."
    The bartender said "Look, how do you spell the Jack in Jack Daniels?"
    The man said "J-A-C-K...Give me a scotch."
    The bartender said "How about the Cap in Captian Morgan?"
    The man said "C-A-P, of course."
    The bartender said "Now how do you spell the fuck in scotch?"
    The man said "There ain't no fuck in scotch."
    The bartender said "I know, that's what I've been trying to tell you, there ain't no fuckin scotch!

    Nice joke, who typed it?
    Huh?
    What am I doing?

  58. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by treeves · · Score: 1

    ...and colds aren't contagious but rhinoviruses are, and tuberculosis isn't contagious but tubercle bacilli are, etc. etc. etc. stupid git.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  59. Re:What about heredity? or why I love ApoE by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Actually, in all our medical genetics research, the only top correlation is with ApoE, which is the hereditary component.

    But, remember, the plaques are merely the result of the filters in your brain failing to function. So, even if this paper (all 8 pages of it) are true, it only means we may have found what causes plaque build up, not that we know what causes Alheimer's disease per se.

    One of the highest correlations in fact, is with cardiovascular damage in the brain, or to the heart, so it's unlikely this is the foundation for a "cure", just a treatment for certain symptoms of the disease.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  60. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by tenton · · Score: 1

    And while he's being a PC semanticist, it's HIV or Human Immuno Virus, but to call it the HIV Virus is to say virus twice.

    Brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department, previously bringing you the ATM machine, PIN number, NIC card and ISBN number.

  61. Must we tell them everything? by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

    Jeez, why don't they just outlaw Herpes? (or Alzheimer's)

  62. Re:I may have herpes but at least I don't have her by theTrueMikeBrown · · Score: 1

    Sad, but true.

    That is why I only watch movies that come out of India