Neither Washoe nor any other non-human primate has learnt sign language in any meaningful way -- not anything that stands up to a bit of critical review. They were certainly smart -- smart enough to learn "If I mimic enough of these signs eventually someone will give me a banana". They were also followed around by credulous 'researchers' who were eager to interpret any hand wave as highly significant, and who in fact so credulous that they didn't notice that most of the time the primates were simply mimicking back to them a gesture that they had just made.
If you want an assessment of how close they were to using sign language, ask someone for whom sign language is a first language to take a look. Without exception, native signers are unimpressed.
As far as parrots go, they're not learning to talk, or learning words -- they're learning to imitate sounds. There's no difference, as far as the parrot is concerned, between "polly want a cracker" and a squawk.
There are lyrebirds near where I live which have learnt to make laser sounds from when there was a laser skirmish being run in the bush. Hearing them make laser sounds at each other is amusing, but no-one ever suggests that they have learnt to play laser skirmish from humans and therefore lyrebirds must have the same game-playing abilities as humans.
Google doesn't have a monopoly in e-mail. Not even close. They can - legally and ethically - use their e-mail service to market whatever they want to you. If they want, they can fill your inbox with spam about Google Docs, Google Maps, Android. If you don't like it, go somewhere else.
I'm getting a bit sick of bogus "anti-competitive" stories. Restrictions on this sort of thing only apply *if you're a monopoly*. If you're not, you can do all the cross promotion and bundling you want. Consumers get to decide whether they like it, and whether they want to take their business elsewhere. You're not obliged to 'play fair' with any of your competitors.
What I really want to see in the bill is a comprehensive list of all the words that are banned. While it wouldn't make the bill any more stupid, it would at least make it much more fun to read.
(But wait, then publication of the bill itself would be a felony....oh, fuck it.)
Slashdot Mirror
There's a third E in that but I don't remember what it stands for...
I believe the word, as used by Microsoft France, is "enculer".
that just connects to a dock or cable and viola
Excellent; now I just need a dock connector for my violin and cello and I won't have to carry around that pesky string quartet any more.
3. "Who is the Prime Minister of Australia" - failure - Julia Gillard.
FTFY
Neither Washoe nor any other non-human primate has learnt sign language in any meaningful way -- not anything that stands up to a bit of critical review. They were certainly smart -- smart enough to learn "If I mimic enough of these signs eventually someone will give me a banana". They were also followed around by credulous 'researchers' who were eager to interpret any hand wave as highly significant, and who in fact so credulous that they didn't notice that most of the time the primates were simply mimicking back to them a gesture that they had just made.
If you want an assessment of how close they were to using sign language, ask someone for whom sign language is a first language to take a look. Without exception, native signers are unimpressed.
As far as parrots go, they're not learning to talk, or learning words -- they're learning to imitate sounds. There's no difference, as far as the parrot is concerned, between "polly want a cracker" and a squawk.
There are lyrebirds near where I live which have learnt to make laser sounds from when there was a laser skirmish being run in the bush. Hearing them make laser sounds at each other is amusing, but no-one ever suggests that they have learnt to play laser skirmish from humans and therefore lyrebirds must have the same game-playing abilities as humans.
> Microsoft Word is a professional text processor (like LaTeX).
Someone needs to track you down and slap you upside the head with all 4 volumes of The Art of Computer Programming.
Google doesn't have a monopoly in e-mail. Not even close. They can - legally and ethically - use their e-mail service to market whatever they want to you. If they want, they can fill your inbox with spam about Google Docs, Google Maps, Android. If you don't like it, go somewhere else.
I'm getting a bit sick of bogus "anti-competitive" stories. Restrictions on this sort of thing only apply *if you're a monopoly*. If you're not, you can do all the cross promotion and bundling you want. Consumers get to decide whether they like it, and whether they want to take their business elsewhere. You're not obliged to 'play fair' with any of your competitors.
What he really said was "We will have to improve the parts that are smooth."
Much as I love LaTeX, *no-one* outside academia uses it, and even there only the geekiest academics can be bothered to learn it.
coup de gras
They hit him with a lump of fat?
Or did you mean coup de grâce?
Nothing like pretentiously misusing a foreign term to make you look like a twat. (Or even a con.)
There, FTFY.
What I really want to see in the bill is a comprehensive list of all the words that are banned. While it wouldn't make the bill any more stupid, it would at least make it much more fun to read.
(But wait, then publication of the bill itself would be a felony....oh, fuck it.)